Use of IMP3 in identification of carcinoma in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas

Research advances of N6-methyladenosine in diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the addition of a methyl group on the N6 position of adenosine and is the most prevalent and abundant epigenetic modification in eukaryote mRNA. m6A marks are added to mRNA by the m6A methyltransferase complex ("writers"), removed by m6A demethylases ("erasers"), and recognized by m6A-binding proteins ("readers"). Recent evidence has shown that the m6A modification plays a crucial role in the pathogenic mechanism and malignant progression of pancreatic cancer, with roles in cell survival, proliferation, migration, invasion, tumor metastasis, and drug resistance.

METHODS

Literature was searched in Pubmed and Web of Science for the following keywords: "N6-methyladenosine", "pancreatic cancer", "epigenetic modification", "immunotherapy".

RESULTS

Among classical m6A regulators, while METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, FTO, YTHDF2, IGF2BP1-3, hnRNPC, and NKAP are upregulated in pancreatic cancer, METTL16 and ALKBH5 are downregulated in pancreatic cancer. m6A modification has been investigated in pancreatic cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dysregulated m6A and its related factors in pancreatic cancer cells and patients indicate their potential values as novel biomarkers in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and targeted therapy.

A Promising Diagnostic Role of Immunohistochemical Expression of Insulin-Like Growth Factor II mRNA Binding Protein 3 (IMP3) in Pancreatic Lesions Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) Cytology

BACKGROUND

Poor prognosis and short survival of patients harboring pancreatic cancer emerge how advanced disease it is. In a trial to achieve the earliest and most accurate diagnosis to manage this progressive disease, we proposed that using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with an adjuvant diagnostic immunohistochemical marker would give better diagnostic results. IMP3 has gained recently wide attention, as many studies found that IMP3 has not only diagnostic but also prognostic role in different types of malignancies.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This prospective work is to assess the diagnostic role of EUS-FNA combined with the immunohistochemical expression of IMP3 on different benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The included pancreatic lesions (n = 140) were obtained by EUS-FNA technique and stained for IMP3 immunohistochemically. Paraffin blocks from patients who underwent excision (n = 92) or core biopsies (n = 48) were performed for confirming diagnosis.

RESULTS

The combined method for diagnosis showed that IMP3 was positive in 78.7%, 91.7%, 100% PAC, mucinous neoplasm with high grade dysplasia, and IPMN with high grade dysplasia, respectively, while almost all benign lesions showed negative IMP3. Also, this method showed sensitivity (78.26%), specificity (95.83%), and accuracy (84.3%).

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA cytology with IMP3 could be a reliable diagnostic tool especially for assessment of malignant pancreatic lesions.

Design of an immunohistochemistry biomarker panel for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Challenges still exist in differentiating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from benign disease. The use of adjuvant testing of tissue biopsies has demonstrated potential diagnostic value. We designed a proof of concept study to first validate four individual immunohistochemistry biomarkers and then combine them into a panel to boost overall diagnostic sensitivity.

METHODS

Malignant and benign pancreas from 27 pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens underwent immunohistochemistry staining with VHL, IMP3, S100A4, S100P. Using ROC curve analysis, threshold criteria for number of cells staining were chosen for each biomarker. Biomarkers were then evaluated as a panel for their ability to discriminate malignant from benign specimens.

RESULTS

Diagnostic sensitivity of VHL, IMP3, S100A4, and S100P were 75.0%, 79.2%, 45.8%, and 0%. When VHL, IMP3, and S100A4 were grouped into a panel, they were able to distinguish cancer from normal tissue with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

The high diagnostic value of an IHC panel consisting of VHL, IMP3, and S100A4 on surgical specimens suggests the need for future prospective studies of these biomarkers on biopsy specimens.

Ancillary Techniques in Cytologic Specimens Obtained from Solid Lesions of the Pancreas: A Review

Advanced methods of molecular characterization have elucidated the genetic, epigenetic, and proteomic alterations associated with the broad spectrum of pancreatic disease, particularly neoplasia. Next-generation sequencing, in particular, has revealed the genomic diversity among pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine and acinar tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, and other pancreatico-biliary neoplasms. Differentiating these entities from one another by morphologic analysis alone may be challenging, especially when examining the small quantities of diagnostic material inherent to cytologic specimens. In order to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic cytomorphology, multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive ancillary tests have been and continue to be developed. Although a great number of such tests have been developed for evaluation of specimens collected from cystic lesions and strictures, ancillary techniques also play a significant role in the evaluation of cytologic specimens obtained from solid lesions of the pancreas. Furthermore, while some tests have been developed to differentiate diagnostic entities from one another, others have been developed to simply identify dysplasia and malignancy. Ancillary studies are particularly important in the subset of cases for which cytomorphologic analysis provides a result that is equivocal or insufficient to guide clinical management. Selection of appropriate ancillary testing modalities requires familiarity with both their methodology and the molecular basis of the pancreatic diseases for which testing is being performed.

Immunohistochemical staining for S100P, SMAD4, and IMP3 on cell block preparations is sensitive and highly specific for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) material is often challenging. An immunohistochemical (IHC) panel may help establish the diagnosis of PDA in cases limited by sample size or ambiguous cytology. S100P, IMP3, and SMAD4 are 3 IHC markers that have shown promise as individual markers for PDA that have never been tested together as a panel. In this study, we evaluated the individual and combined efficacy of S100P, IMP3, and SMAD4 for the detection of PDA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

S100P, IMP3, and SMAD4 IHC staining was performed on cell blocks (CBs) procured from pancreatic EUS-FNA procedures. The cohort included CBs that were diagnostic for PDA (n = 35), suspicious but nondiagnostic for PDA (n = 2), as well as CBs with benign pancreatic ductal epithelium (n = 12) and benign reactive pancreatic ductal epithelium (n = 18). A positive result for IMP3 and S100P was defined as moderate or strong staining of >10% of ductal cells. Complete lack of SMAD4 nuclear staining was considered a positive result-any nuclear SMAD4 staining was considered a negative result.

RESULTS

Two and 3 IHC marker panels were almost always more specific than individual IHC markers. Positivity for at least 2 of 3 IHC markers was a sensitive (91.89%) and highly specific (100%) marker of PDA.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 IHC marker panel composed of S100P, IMP3, and SMAD4 is highly specific for PDA. Future studies should evaluate efficacy in a cohort with more atypical and suspicious cases.

Practical Immunohistochemistry in Neoplastic Pathology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas

CONTEXT

- Immunomarkers with diagnostic, therapeutic, or prognostic values have been increasingly used to maximize the benefits of clinical management of patients with neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas.

OBJECTIVES

- To review the characteristics of immunomarkers that are commonly used in surgical pathology practice for neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas, and to summarize the clinical usefulness of immunomarkers that have been discovered in recent years in these fields.

DATA SOURCES

- Data sources include literature review, authors' research data, and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

- Immunohistochemistry is an indispensable tool for the accurate diagnosis of neoplastic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Useful immunomarkers are available to help distinguish malignant neoplasms from benign conditions, determine organ origins, and subclassify neoplasms that are morphologically and biologically heterogeneous. Specific immunomarkers are also available to help guide patient treatment and assess disease aggressiveness, which are keys to the success of personalized medicine. Pathologists will continue to play a critical role in the discovery, validation, and application of new biomarkers, which will ultimately improve patient care.

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of incidental pancreatic lesions are being detected each year. Accurate characterisation of pancreatic lesions into benign, precancerous, and cancer masses is crucial in deciding whether to use treatment or surveillance. Distinguishing benign lesions from precancerous and cancerous lesions can prevent patients from undergoing unnecessary major surgery. Despite the importance of accurately classifying pancreatic lesions, there is no clear algorithm for management of focal pancreatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities in detecting cancerous and precancerous lesions in people with focal pancreatic lesions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index until 19 July 2016. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include studies reporting cross-sectional information on the index test (CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PET (positron emission tomography), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), EUS elastography, and EUS-guided biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration)) and reference standard (confirmation of the nature of the lesion was obtained by histopathological examination of the entire lesion by surgical excision, or histopathological examination for confirmation of precancer or cancer by biopsy and clinical follow-up of at least six months in people with negative index tests) in people with pancreatic lesions irrespective of language or publication status or whether the data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently searched the references to identify relevant studies and extracted the data. We planned to use the bivariate analysis to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) to compare the tests and assess heterogeneity, but used simpler models (such as univariate random-effects model and univariate fixed-effect model) for combining studies when appropriate because of the sparse data. We were unable to compare the diagnostic performance of the tests using formal statistical methods because of sparse data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies involving a total of 3,196 participants evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various index tests. In these 54 studies, eight different target conditions were identified with different final diagnoses constituting benign, precancerous, and cancerous lesions. None of the studies was of high methodological quality. None of the comparisons in which single studies were included was of sufficiently high methodological quality to warrant highlighting of the results. For differentiation of cancerous lesions from benign or precancerous lesions, we identified only one study per index test. The second analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous versus benign lesions, provided three tests in which meta-analysis could be performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer were: EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.00), specificity 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), specificity 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.74); PET: sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), specificity 0.65 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84). The third analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous lesions from benign lesions, only provided one test (EUS-FNA) in which meta-analysis was performed. EUS-FNA had moderate sensitivity for diagnosing precancerous or cancerous lesions (sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.00) and high specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.00), the extremely wide confidence intervals reflecting the heterogeneity between the studies). The fourth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (dysplasia) provided three tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive carcinoma were: CT: sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97); EUS: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.98); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.66 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.99), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). The fifth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) versus precancerous (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) provided six tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) were: CT: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.47 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.00); EUS-FNA carcinoembryonic antigen 200 ng/mL: sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), specificity 0.51 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81); MRI: sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86), specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.00); PET: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The sixth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided no tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The seventh analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided two tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cancer were: CT: sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) and MRI: sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95), respectively. The eighth analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) or benign lesions provided no test in which meta-analysis was performed.There were no major alterations in the subgroup analysis of cystic pancreatic focal lesions (42 studies; 2086 participants). None of the included studies evaluated EUS elastography or sequential testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to arrive at any firm conclusions because of the differences in the way that study authors classified focal pancreatic lesions into cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions; the inclusion of few studies with wide confidence intervals for each comparison; poor methodological quality in the studies; and heterogeneity in the estimates within comparisons.

The role of S100P and IMP3 in the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the role of the two markers, S100P and IMP3, in differentiating between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and non-neoplastic pancreatic tissue in (fine needle aspiration cytology) FNAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study that included 72 cases presented with pancreatic mass, where endoscopic guided FNAC was taken from pancreatic lesions. The final histopathologic diagnosis was considered the gold standard. Cell blocks were stained with anti S100P, and IMP3. Nuclear immunoreactivity with or without cytoplasmic staining for the first marker, and cytoplasmic staining for the second marker was considered specific. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and total accuracy of the two markers, as well as the combined accuracy of both markers were calculated.

RESULTS

S100P achieved 96.4% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, 98.2% PPV, 87.5% NPV and 95.8% total accuracy, while IMP3 achieved 91.2% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, 96.2% PPV, 72.2% NPV and 90.3% total accuracy for PDA. Both markers showed a total combined accuracy of 89%. S100P showed strong and diffuse staining pattern in most of cases, while the staining pattern for IMP3 was moderate and focal in most of cases.

CONCLUSION

Both markers were sensitive and specific for diagnosis of PDA. The staining pattern for S100P was easier to evaluate than IMP3.

Diagnostic value of IMP3 and mesothelin in differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

The discrimination between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and chronic pancreatitis may be confusing at both clinical and radiologic levels. So, the search for biomarkers able to distinguish both clinical conditions is of great interest.

AIM

This study was undertaken to assess the value of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) and mesothelin to differentiate PDA from non-neoplastic/reactive pancreatic duct epithelium.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for IMP3 and mesothelin was performed on 40 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections of PDA, 20 biopsies of chronic pancreatitis and 10 normal pancreatic tissue obtained from tumor-free surgical margins. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

IMP3 immunoreactivity was observed in 34 of 40 (85%) cases of PDA. The staining reaction was moderate to strong in 30 (75%) cases and diffuse in 26 (65%) cases. Eighteen of 20 (90%) biopsies of chronic pancreatitis were negative for IMP3, while the other two cases (10%) showed weak and focal IMP3 immunoreactivity. On the other hand, mesothelin demonstrated positive immunoreactivity in 30 of 40 (75%) cases of PDA. The staining reaction was moderate to strong in 24 (60%) cases and diffuse in 22 (55%) cases. Sixteen of 20 (80%) biopsies of chronic pancreatitis were negative for mesothelin, while weak and focal mesothelin staining was detected in the other 4 cases. All normal pancreatic tissues were negative for IMP3 and mesothelin expression. IMP3 showed higher sensitivity (85%) and specificity (90%) than mesothelin (75% and 80%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that IMP3 immunostaining has a higher sensitivity and specificity than mesothelin for the diagnosis of PDA. IMP3 and mesothelin may be useful markers in distinguishing neoplastic from reactive lesions of the pancreas in instances where this is impossible by morphology alone in surgical pathology practice.

The involvement of insulin-like growth factor 2 binding protein 3 (IMP3) in pancreatic cancer cell migration, invasion, and adhesion

Background

Over-expression of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) is correlated with poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Previous studies examining other cancer types have implicated IMP3 in the regulation of several cellular functions that are characteristic of tumour cells. However, the role of this oncofetal protein in PDAC progression remained unclear.

Methods

Using siRNA, we examined the effect of IMP3 inhibition on the motility, invasive ability, and matrix adhesion of PDAC cells. In addition, we also evaluated the expression of cytoskeleton-associated genes following IMP depletion.

Results

Knockdown of IMP3 significantly decreased the motility, invasion, and extracellular matrix adhesion of select PDAC cells in vitro. In addition, IMP3-depleted cells exhibited lower levels of CD44 protein and KIF11 mRNA. Moreover, we also observed a reduction in downstream RhoA signaling following IMP3 knockdown, indicating that IMP3 modulates the levels of proteins involved in cytoskeletal organization.

Conclusions

These results suggest that IMP3 facilitates PDAC progression by enhancing the pro-metastatic behaviour of tumour cells.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1251-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Expression of KOC, S100P, mesothelin and MUC1 in pancreatico-biliary adenocarcinomas: development and utility of a potential diagnostic immunohistochemistry panel

BACKGROUND

Pancreatico-biliary adenocarcinomas (PBA) have a poor prognosis. Diagnosis is usually achieved by imaging and/or endoscopy with confirmatory cytology. Cytological interpretation can be difficult especially in the setting of chronic pancreatitis/cholangitis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers could act as an adjunct to cytology to improve the diagnosis. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis and selected KOC, S100P, mesothelin and MUC1 for further validation in PBA resection specimens.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays containing tumour and normal cores in a ratio of 3:2, from 99 surgically resected PBA patients, were used for IHC. IHC was performed on an automated platform using antibodies against KOC, S100P, mesothelin and MUC1. Tissue cores were scored for staining intensity and proportion of tissue stained using a Histoscore method (range, 0-300). Sensitivity and specificity for individual biomarkers, as well as biomarker panels, were determined with different cut-offs for positivity and compared by summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The expression of all four biomarkers was high in PBA versus normal ducts, with a mean Histoscore of 150 vs. 0.4 for KOC, 165 vs. 0.3 for S100P, 115 vs. 0.5 for mesothelin and 200 vs. 14 for MUC1 (p < .0001 for all comparisons). Five cut-offs were carefully chosen for sensitivity/specificity analysis. Four of these cut-offs, namely 5%, 10% or 20% positive cells and Histoscore 20 were identified using ROC curve analysis and the fifth cut-off was moderate-strong staining intensity. Using 20% positive cells as a cut-off achieved higher sensitivity/specificity values: KOC 84%/100%; S100P 83%/100%; mesothelin 88%/92%; and MUC1 89%/63%. Analysis of a panel of KOC, S100P and mesothelin achieved 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity if at least 2 biomarkers were positive for 10% cut-off; and 100% sensitivity and specificity for 20% cut-off.

CONCLUSION

A biomarker panel of KOC, S100P and mesothelin with at least 2 biomarkers positive was found to be an optimum panel with both 10% and 20% cut-offs in resection specimens from patients with PBA.

Oncofetal protein IMP3, a new cancer biomarker

IMP3 is a member of a family of RNA-binding proteins that consists of IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3. These proteins contain 2 RNA recognition motifs and 4 K-homology domains that allow them to bind RNAs strongly and specifically. IMP3 is an oncofetal protein involved in embryogenesis and its expression is associated with a number of malignant neoplasms. IMP3 is associated with aggressive and advanced cancers and is specifically expressed in malignant tumors but is not found in adjacent benign tissues. Moreover, in vitro studies have shown that IMP3 promotes tumor cell proliferation, adhesion, and invasion. This review focuses on the studies of IMP3 expression in different cancers and emphasizes the potential utility of IMP3 in routine surgical pathology practice. We also discuss IMP3 as a prognostic biomarker for cancer patients' outcomes.

Sensitivity of alternative testing for pancreaticobiliary cancer: a 10-y review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Biliary strictures present a diagnostic challenge to differentiate benign disease from hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) malignancies. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cytology is commonly performed in these patients; however, its sensitivity for diagnosis of HPB malignancy is poor (41.6%). Many adjunctive tests have been investigated to improve the sensitivity of HPB biopsies. To determine the best tests available, however, we reviewed the literature and performed a comparative analysis of all recently investigated tests and their sensitivities.

METHODS

A PubMed search identified articles published between 2003 and 2014, describing alternate methods for diagnosing HPB malignancies, reported sensitivity, final pathology, and had data available online. Meta-analysis was conducted for tests with multiple articles. Tests with the highest sensitivity and specificities were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 77 studies were identified. Meta-analysis was performed on the sensitivity of EUS-FNA (74.2%), fluorescence in situ hybridization (54.2%), immunostain of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding Protein 3 (IMP3; 80.4%), IMP3 + cytology (86.4%), K homology domain containing protein overexpressed in cancer (KOC; 85.9%), S100P (77.8%), serum CA19-9 (69.3%), and K-ras mutations (47.0%) to detect malignancy. Ultimately, 12 tests were identified with superior sensitivity (85.3%-100%) and specificities (81.6%-100%) including stricture scrapping, brush sectioning, IMP3 stain + cytology, IMP3+S100A4, bile carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 6 protein (±CA19-9), bile micro RNA (miRNA)-135b, serum miRNA-RNU2-1f, serum miRNA-21 (+CA19-9), peripheral blood mononuclear cells miRNA-27a-3p (+CA19-9), serum miRNA-16 + miRNA-196a (+CA19-9), peripheral blood mononuclear cells mRNAs h-TERT + CK20 + CEA + C-MET.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend immunostaining with a panel of IMP3+KOC + S100A4 + cytology to achieve maximum sensitivity and specificity from HPB biopsies. One biliary protein (carcinoembryonic cell adhesion molecule 6) and several RNAs (bile and blood) offer exceptional sensitivity and specificity and should be tested prospectively in larger populations. Overall, this review identifies several tests to improve the sensitivity of diagnostic algorithms to identify HPB malignancies.

IMP3 RNP safe houses prevent miRNA-directed HMGA2 mRNA decay in cancer and development

The IMP3 RNA-binding protein is associated with metastasis and poor outcome in human cancer. Using solid cancer transcriptome data, we found that IMP3 correlates with HMGA2 mRNA expression. Cytoplasmic IMP3 granules contain HMGA2, and IMP3 dose-dependently increases HMGA2 mRNA. HMGA2 is regulated by let-7, and let-7 antagomiRs make HMGA2 refractory to IMP3. Removal of let-7 target sites eliminates IMP3-dependent stabilization, and IMP3-containing bodies are depleted of Ago1-4 and miRNAs. The relationship between Hmga2 mRNA and IMPs also exists in the developing limb bud, where IMP1-deficient embryos show dose-dependent Hmga2 mRNA downregulation. Finally, IMP3 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) contain other let-7 target mRNAs, including LIN28B, and a global gene set enrichment analysis demonstrates that miRNA-regulated transcripts in general are upregulated following IMP3 induction. We conclude that IMP3 RNPs may function as cytoplasmic safe houses and prevent miRNA-directed mRNA decay of oncogenes during tumor progression.

Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 expression in effusion cytology: a marker for metastatic adenocarcinoma cells and a potential prognostic indicator in gastric adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to identify the diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) in distinguishing metastatic adenocarcinoma cells (MAC) from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC) in effusions. We also investigated the role of IMP3 as a prognostic indicator for patients with malignant effusion.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 156 cell block specimens, including 116 malignant effusions with MAC and 40 benign effusions with RMC, were subjected to immunocytochemical staining for IMP3.

RESULTS

Immunocytochemical studies showed positive staining for IMP3 in 91 of 116 (78.4%) cases of MAC and in 3 of 40 (7.5%) cases of RMC. With regard to distinguishing MAC from RMC, the IMP3 reactivity was found to be 78.4% sensitive and 92.5% specific with a positive predictive value of 96.8% and a negative predictive value of 59.7%. Diffuse IMP3 expression (>25%) in MAC from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that IMP3 is a helpful marker for differentiating MAC from RMC, and that diffuse IMP3 expression is a poor prognostic indicator in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and malignant effusion.

Intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions are a specific feature of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms that distinguish contaminating gastric epithelium

INTRODUCTION

Low-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are challenging to diagnose because of an absence of reliable morphologic or immunohistochemical features to distinguish them from contaminating gastric foveolar epithelium. After noting intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions (ICIs) in some cases of IPMN, we investigated whether ICIs could be used as a specific feature to distinguish IPMN from gastric foveolar epithelium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 61 transduodenal endoscopic fine-needle aspirations of histologically or clinically verified pancreatic IPMNs without high-grade dysplasia from 2005 to 2012 were identified. A control cohort of 24 endoscopic fine-needle aspirations containing gastric epithelium was selected from transgastric specimens of nonpancreatic targets from the same period. Every fragment of mucinous epithelium in the 2 cohorts was examined in alcohol-fixed and cell block sections at high magnification to identify ICIs.

RESULTS

ICIs were observed in 31% (19 of 61) of cases in mucinous epithelial fragments obtained by fine-needle aspirations from low-grade IPMNs. When present, they were seen in about 1% of all cells. No ICIs were identified in the control cohort of 24 patients with normal gastric epithelium (P = 0.001 Fisher exact test). BRAF mutation (V600E) testing was performed on 5 IPMN cases, and was negative in all cases including 2 with and 3 without ICIs. KRAS mutation testing was performed on 9 cases of IPMN cases. Two cases with ICIs tested positive for KRAS mutations. Four cases without ICIs also tested positive, and 3 cases without ICIs tested negative.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs are a specific morphologic feature found in about one third of low-grade IPMNs, but absent in gastric foveolar epithelium. There is no obvious molecular correlate with the presence of ICIs.

Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 predicts a poor prognosis for colorectal adenocarcinoma

Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) has been recently identified as a marker of aggressive behavior in several types of tumors. The aim of the present study was to detect the expression of the IMP3 protein in colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) and to identify a correlation with the clinicopathological features of the disease. IMP3 was evaluated in 186 samples of CRA using immunohistochemical methods. The correlation between IMP3 expression and the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer was evaluated by the χ² and Fisher’s exact tests. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the correlation between IMP3 protein expression and the prognosis of patients with CRA was analyzed using Cox analysis. Of the 186 adjacent normal mucosa (ANM) cases, the 22 that exhibited dysplasia demonstrated weak IMP3 expression and the 164 without dysplasia showed no expression. Of the 186 CRA cases, immunohistochemical staining for IMP3 was observed in 143 cases (76.9%). A comparison of IMP3 expression between the CRA and ANM samples revealed stronger immunohistochemical reactivity in the CRA tissues (P<0.01). High IMP3 expression was associated with differentiation, lymphoid metastasis, TNM stage, Ki-67 labeling index and a poor patient outcome (P<0.05). In the multivariate analysis, IMP3 emerged as an independent predictor of survival. The present study demonstrated that IMP3 is able to promote the aggressiveness of cancer behavior, resulting in a poor prognosis for patients with CRA. Consequently, IMP3 may be regarded as a novel proliferation and prognostic indicator for patients with CRA.

IMP3, NESP55, TTF-1 and CDX2 serve as an immunohistochemical panel in the distinction among small-cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal carcinoid, and pancreatic endocrine tumor metastasized to the liver

Histopathologic distinction among small-cell carcinoma (SCC), pancreatic endocrine tumor (PET), and gastrointestinal carcinoids metastasized to the liver in needle core biopsies can be extremely challenging because of limited material, crush artifact, and lack of detailed clinical history. In this study, a total of 61 surgically resected or biopsied specimens, including 27 SCCs (lung, 17; colon, 1; gallbladder, 2; stomach, 1; and unknown primary, 6), 18 gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors (GICTs) (stomach, 2; small intestine, 14; colon, 2), and 16 PETs were immunohistochemically examined for the expression of IMP3, TTF-1, CDX2, and NESP55 to evaluate their diagnostic value. The results showed that 24 (89%) of 27 SCCs exhibited strong cytoplasmic staining for IMP3 in 60% to 100% of the tumor cells. Eighteen (67%) SCCs were strongly and diffusely positive for TTF-1. In the remaining 9 TTF-1-negative SCCs (including 4 extrapulmonary cases), 7 showed strong and diffuse IMP3 expression. All SCCs were negative for CDX2 except for 1 case of colonic origin that showed strong CDX2 immunoreactivity. All 16 metastatic PETs were positively stained for IMP3 with 12 cases (75%) showing a diffuse and moderate-to-strong staining pattern while they were negative for TTF-1. Six PETs exhibited moderate-to-strong positivity for CDX2 with nuclear staining in 5% to 40% of tumor cells, and 5 showed a varying degree of positivity for NESP55. Three (17%) of 18 metastatic GICTs showed moderate IMP3 staining in 50% to 90% of the tumor cells, whereas CDX2 was expressed in 17 (94%) cases with moderate-to-strong staining in 50% to 100% of tumor cells. No NESP55 immunoreactivity was detected in metastatic SCCs and GICTs. In conclusion, a panel of these 4 markers is useful in segregating among SCC, PET, and GICT to help determine the primary site of hepatic metastasis.

Use of IMP3, S100P, and pVHL immunopanel to aid in the interpretation of bile duct biopsies with atypical histology or suspicious for malignancy

Histologic evaluation of an endoscopic bile duct biopsy for malignancy is a known challenge. Our prior study has shown that the insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA binding protein-3 (IMP3), S100P, and the von Hippel-Lindau gene product (pVHL) are a useful immunopanel for the distinction between adenocarcinoma and benign biliary epithelium. To further evaluate the usefulness of the IMP3, S100P, and pVHL immunopanel to aid in the interpretation of bile duct biopsies, 16 histologically challenging bile duct biopsies that exhibited atypical histology or features suspicious for malignancy were immunohistochemically stained for IMP3, S100P, and pVHL. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for each case. The results showed that in the 11 cases that showed adenocarcinoma during follow-up, the following staining patterns in atypical/suspicious cells in the initial biopsies were observed: IMP3-positive/S100P-positive/pVHL-negative or reduced (n=6), IMP3-negative/S100P-positive/pVHL-negative or reduced (n=4), and IMP3-positive/S100P-negative/pVHL-negative (n=1). In the 5 follow-up-proven benign cases, 2 biopsies showed an IMP3-negative/S100P-positive/pVHL-positive pattern in atypical cells and 1 was negative for all 3 proteins. The remaining 2 biopsies exhibited an IMP3-positive/S100P-positive/pVHL-negative or reduced pattern in atypical cells that were histologically considered dysplastic on retrospective review. These observations reaffirm that bile duct adenocarcinoma frequently shows positive IMP3 and/or S100P staining with reciprocal negative or reduced pVHL expression. This staining pattern can also be seen in dysplastic epithelium in the absence of invasive carcinoma. On the contrary, benign biliary epithelium typically lacks IMP3 immunoreactivity and may retain normal pVHL expression. However, caution should be exercised when using this immunopanel in the interpretation of challenging bile duct biopsies, because S100P and pVHL stains may give rise to variable patterns that can be difficult to interpret.

Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression?

The insulin-like growth factor-2 mRNA-binding proteins 1, 2, and 3 (IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2, IGF2BP3) belong to a conserved family of RNA-binding, oncofetal proteins. Several studies have shown that these proteins act in various important aspects of cell function, such as cell polarization, migration, morphology, metabolism, proliferation and differentiation. In this review, we discuss the IGF2BP family’s role in cancer biology and how this correlates with their proposed functions during embryogenesis. IGF2BPs are mainly expressed in the embryo, in contrast with comparatively lower or negotiable levels in adult tissues. IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 have been found to be re-expressed in several aggressive cancer types. Control of IGF2BPs’ expression is not well understood; however, let-7 microRNAs, β-catenin (CTNNB1) and MYC have been proposed to be involved in their regulation. In contrast to many other RNA-binding proteins, IGF2BPs are almost exclusively observed in the cytoplasm where they associate with target mRNAs in cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes (mRNPs). During development, IGF2BPs are required for proper nerve cell migration and morphological development, presumably involving the control of cytoskeletal remodeling and dynamics, respectively. Likewise, IGF2BPs modulate cell polarization, adhesion and migration in tumor-derived cells. Moreover, they are highly associated with cancer metastasis and the expression of oncogenic factors (KRAS, MYC and MDR1). However, a pro-metastatic role of IGF2BPs remains controversial due to the lack of ‘classical’ in vivo studies. Nonetheless, IGF2BPs could provide valuable targets in cancer treatment with many of their in vivo roles to be fully elucidated.

MicroRNA expression aids the preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate microRNA (miRNA) expression in pancreatic resection specimens and fine needle aspiration biopsies and determine which, if any, miRNAs aid the distinction between benign and malignant pancreatic tumors in limited cytology material.

METHODS

Resection specimens containing adenocarcinoma (n = 17), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (n = 11), and nonneoplastic tissues (n = 15) were evaluated for miR-21, miR-221, miR-100, miR-155, and miR-181b expression by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and a subset of carcinomas and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms was analyzed with miRNA microarrays. Cellblocks containing carcinoma (n = 26) or benign pancreatic lesions (n = 11) from fine needle aspiration biopsies were subjected to qRT-PCR for miR-21, miR-221, miR-181b, miR-196a, and miR-217.

RESULTS

Carcinomas showed higher expression of miR-21, miR-221, miR-155, miR-100, and miR-181b than benign lesions by qRT-PCR, and overexpression of miR-21, miR-221, and miR-181b was confirmed by microarray analysis. Cellblocks containing carcinoma showed higher expression of miR-21, miR-221, and miR-196a than those from benign lesions (P < 0.001, P = 0.009, and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas show differential expression of miRNAs compared to benign pancreatic lesions. A select panel of miRNAs aids the distinction between pancreatic lesions in cytology specimens.

Expression of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 in human esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions

CONTEXT

Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) is an oncofetal protein highly expressed in fetal tissue and malignant tumors but only rarely within adult benign tissues. The expression of IMP3 in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and its precursor lesions including distinctive type Barrett mucosa (BM, intestinal metaplasia) and esophageal columnar dysplasia (ECD) is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the patterns of IMP3 expression in EAC and its precursor lesions.

DESIGN

Samples from 132 cases of EAC, 28 cases of ECD (16 high-grade dysplasia and 12 low-grade dysplasia cases), 28 cases of BM without dysplasia, and 138 cases of nonneoplastic esophageal mucosa without dysplasia or BM within formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue microarray blocks were examined. Tissues were stained with mouse monoclonal anti-IMP3 antibody. The intensity (1-3+) and percent (0%-100%) of positive cytoplasmic and/or membranous IMP3 staining cells were determined.

RESULTS

Most of EAC cases (93 of 132; 70%) showed cytoplasmic and membranous IMP3 staining. Poorly and moderately differentiated EAC showed statistically significant higher IMP3 expression compared with well-differentiated EAC (P < .001). A subset of ECD cases (7 of 28; 25%) was positive for IMP3, including 3 low-grade dysplasia cases (focal 1+ IMP3 staining) and 4 high-grade dysplasia cases (more diffuse 1-2+ IMP3 staining). No IMP3 staining was observed in any nonneoplastic esophageal mucosa and BM tissues without dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that IMP3 may play a role in the carcinogenesis of EAC and has diagnostic utility in differentiating neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions of the esophagus.

Diagnostic utility of IMP3 expression in thyroid neoplasms: a quantitative RT-PCR study

The capability of molecular markers to differentiate between benign and malignant well-differentiated thyroid tumors remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein-3 (IMP3) mRNA expression to distinguish benign from malignant thyroid tumors. RNA samples from 80 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded thyroid tissues, including 22 usual papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), 18 follicular variants of PTC, 5 follicular thyroid carcinomas, 33 follicular adenomas, and 2 hyperplastic nodules, were used for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. IMP3 mRNA expression levels in thyroid tumors were expressed as relative fold change (fold) after normalization with normal thyroid RNA. The results showed that thyroid carcinomas including PTC, follicular variants of PTC, and follicular thyroid carcinomas have significantly higher IMP3 expression levels with 48.3, 35.3, and 43.8 fold, respectively, compared with benign thyroid lesions (2.8 fold). Using the IMP3 expression value of 5 fold as a cutoff point to separate benign and malignant thyroid tumors, IMP3 qRT-PCR analysis had a 91.4% clinical specificity and 86.7% clinical sensitivity for the diagnosis of well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas. Conventional RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analysis for IMP3 in a subset of cases supported the qRT-PCR results. These results indicate that detection of IMP3 mRNA expression levels by qRT-PCR may be a useful molecular marker to assist in the diagnosis of well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas.

S100P, von Hippel-Lindau gene product, and IMP3 serve as a useful immunohistochemical panel in the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on endoscopic bile duct biopsy

Histopathologic distinction between benign and malignant bile duct epithelial lesions on endoscopic biopsies can be extremely challenging because of limited material, crush artifact, and compounding inflammatory and/or reactive changes particularly after stent placement. In this study, a total of 72 endoscopic bile duct biopsies, including 40 adenocarcinomas and 32 benign cases, were immunohistochemically examined for the expression of S100P, von Hippel-Lindau gene product (pVHL), and IMP3 to evaluate their diagnostic value. The results showed that 36 adenocarcinomas (90%) exhibited strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for S100P, of which 30 (83.3%) showed diffuse immunoreactivity. Intermediate to strong cytoplasmic staining for IMP3 was demonstrated in 31 tumors (77.5%) (15 diffuse, 16 focal). Completely negative staining for pVHL was observed in 37 adenocarcinomas. In the remaining 3 tumors, focal (1) or diffuse (2) membranous and cytoplasmic pVHL immunoreactivity was detected. Twenty-eight tumors (70%) showed a S100P+/IMP3+/pVHL- staining pattern, 6 (15%) with a S100P+/IMP3-/pVHL- pattern, and 2 (5%) with a S100P-/IMP3+/pVHL- pattern. All 32 benign biopsies were completely negative for IMP3 with the exception of 2 cases with focal dysplasia where focal immunoreactivity was observed. Thirty benign biopsies (93.8%) were positive for pVHL with a diffuse staining pattern observed in 28 cases (93.3%). Eight benign biopsies (25%) showed focal S100P positivity. Twenty-two benign biopsies (68.8%) displayed a S100P-/IMP3-/pVHL+ staining pattern. In conclusion, an immunohistochemical panel consisting of S100P, pVHL, and IMP3 can be helpful in distinguishing adenocarcinoma from reactive epithelial changes on challenging bile duct biopsies. The findings of focal S100P and/or IMP3 expression with reciprocal loss of pVHL immunoreactivity in a few benign biopsies suggest a use of these markers in the detection of early epithelial dysplasia that may be beyond histologic recognition.

Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) overexpression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma correlates with poor survival

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a lethal disease with a 5-year survival rate of 4% and typically presents in an advanced stage. In this setting, prognostic markers identifying the more agrressive tumors could aid in managment decisions. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3, also known as IMP3 or KOC) is an oncofetal RNA-binding protein that regulates targets such as insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2) and ACTB (beta-actin).

Methods

We evaluated the expression of IGF2BP3 by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray of 127 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with tumor grade 1, 2 and 3 according to WHO criteria, and the prognostic value of IGF2BP3 expression.

Results

IGF2BP3 was found to be selectively overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissues but not in benign pancreatic tissues. Nine (38%) patient samples of tumor grade 1 (n = 24) and 27 (44%) of tumor grade 2 (n = 61) showed expression of IGF2BP3. The highest rate of expression was seen in poorly differentiated specimen (grade 3, n = 42) with 26 (62%) positive samples. Overall survival was found to be significantly shorter in patients with IGF2BP3 expressing tumors (P = 0.024; RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.8).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that IGF2BP3 overexpression identifies a subset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with an extremely poor outcome and supports the rationale for developing therapies to target the IGF pathway in this cancer.

Insulin-like growth factor mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) is differentially expressed in benign and malignant follicular patterned thyroid tumors

Insulin-like growth factor mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) is an mRNA-binding protein that regulates transcription of insulin-like growth factor II affecting cell proliferation during embryogenesis. It is highly expressed in carcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, colon, rectum, kidneys, uterine cervix, lung, and ovary. The purpose of our study was to evaluate IMP3 expression in thyroid follicular lesions, to determine whether it has a role in differentiating among these lesions, and to understand their biological relationships. We immunostained 219 thyroid lesions selected from our surgical pathology archives including 14 hyperplastic colloid nodules (CN), 19 Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), two Graves disease (GD), ten Hürthle cell adenoma (HCA), 20 follicular adenoma (FA), 37 conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), 60 follicular variant of papillary carcinoma (FVPC), 19 Hürthle cell carcinoma (HCC), 32 follicular carcinoma (FC), and six poorly differentiated/anaplastic carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed sections using monoclonal antibody to IMP3. Clinicopathological data were also reviewed. In all cases, residual thyroid tissue, CN, HT, GD, HCA, and FA were completely negative for IMP3 staining. Of the 60 FVPC, 23 tumors (38%) were positive for IMP3, with 13 of these (22%) showing very strong staining (3+). Of the 32 FC, 22 tumors (69%) were positive, with seven (22%) showing very strong staining (3+). Furthermore, 33 out of 37 cases (89%) of PTC were negative for IMP3. In all four PTC cases that did stain positive, staining was weak-moderate (1-2+). Similarly, 15 out of 19 cases (79%) of HCC were negative. No significant correlation was found between pathologic tumor characteristics and IMP3 expression in differentiated follicular pattern thyroid carcinoma. With 100% specificity and 69% sensitivity for FC as compared to FA and 100% specificity for FVPC, again compared to FA, IMP3 has the potential to be diagnostically useful in differentiating malignant and benign follicular pattern thyroid lesions. This study also points to a possible common biological relationship between FC and FVPC that requires further investigation.