1
|
Odumegwu JN, Chavez-Yenter D, Goodman MS, Kaphingst KA. Associations between subjective social status and predictors of interest in genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:1201-1212. [PMID: 38700724 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01878-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic testing for gene mutations which elevate risk for breast cancer is particularly important for women diagnosed at a young age. Differences remain in access and utilization to testing across social groups, and research on the predictors of interest in genetic testing for women diagnosed at a young age is limited. METHODS We examined the relationships between subjective social status (SSS) and variables previously identified as possible predictors of genetic testing, including genome sequencing knowledge, genetic worry, cancer worry, health consciousness, decision-making preferences, genetic self-efficacy, genetic-related beliefs, and subjective numeracy, among a cohort of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. RESULTS In this sample (n = 1,076), those who had higher SSS had significantly higher knowledge about the limitations of genome sequencing (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01-1.21) and significantly higher informational norms (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.19-3.14) than those with lower SSS. Similarly, education (OR = 2.75; 95% CI = 1.79-4.22), health status (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.44-3.31) were significant predictors among higher SSS women compared to lower SSS women in our multivariate analysis. Lower SSS women with low self-reported income (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.08-0.20) had lower odds of genetic testing interest. Our results are consistent with some prior research utilizing proxy indicators for socioeconomic status, but our research adds the importance of using a multidimensional indicator such as SSS to examine cancer and genetic testing predictor outcomes. CONCLUSION To develop interventions to improve genetic knowledge, researchers should consider the social status and contexts of women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age (or before 40 years old) to ensure equity in the distribution of genetic testing benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan N Odumegwu
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hay JL, Wu Y, Schofield E, Kaphingst K, Sussman AL, Guest DD, Hunley K, Li Y, Buller D, Berwick M. Exploring the role of cancer fatalism and engagement with skin cancer genetic information in diverse primary care patients. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6331. [PMID: 38546209 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To broaden the currently limited reach of genomic innovations, research is needed to understand how psychosocial and cultural factors influence reactions to genetic testing in diverse subgroups. Cancer fatalism is important in cancer prevention and deserves theoretical and empirical attention in the context of genomics and behavior change. METHODS The current study employed data from a randomized controlled trial (N = 593) offering skin cancer genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in primary care in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. We examined interrelations of cancer fatalism with demographics, general health beliefs, perceived risk, perceived control, sun protection and skin screening behaviors and cancer worry in the skin cancer context stratified across Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity, and examined cancer fatalism as a moderator of intervention effects on study primary outcomes, including 3-month sun protection, cancer worry and perceived risk. RESULTS Cancer fatalism was significantly related to the perception of control over skin cancer risk behaviors (ps ≤ 0.01) and demographics (ethnicity, education, health literacy; ps < 0.05), but not consistently related to general health beliefs or risk perception. Cancer fatalism did not moderate intervention effects on primary outcomes, except those with higher cancer fatalism randomized to intervention had higher levels of 3-month cancer worry (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS These findings will guide future work considering the role of cancer fatalism in use of genomic technologies in the general population. This work anticipates strategies required to address cancer fatalism as translational genomics becomes more commonly available to diverse general population subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Hay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yelena Wu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kim Kaphingst
- Cancer Communication Research, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew L Sussman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Delores D Guest
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Keith Hunley
- Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Marianne Berwick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhong L, Bather JR, Daly BM, Kohlmann WK, Goodman MS, Rothwell E, Kaphingst KA. Investigation of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing and expanded carrier screening among women of reproductive age. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100128. [PMID: 37214524 PMCID: PMC10194195 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To examine cognitive, relational, and social predictors of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing (CPT) and expanded carrier screening (ECS) offered in routine gynecologic care for women of reproductive age. Methods Women between 20 and 35 years old who were currently pregnant or had a prior pregnancy (N = 351) completed an online survey. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant predictors of women's interest in and timing preference for CPT and ECS. Results Most respondents reported high interest in CPT and ECS and preferred to have them when planning for a pregnancy. Perceived importance of genetic information and negative attitude towards uncertainty predicted interest in CPT and ECS in multivariable models. Genetic knowledge predicted preference for CPT or ECS when planning for a pregnancy. Conclusion Educational and decision support tools should be developed to enhance women's knowledge and awareness of CPT and ECS and to provide them with strategies to manage uncertainty. Innovation We examined women's timing preference for CPT and ECS and the impact of partner support and trust with gynecologist. A context-specific attitudes toward uncertainty scale was used to investigate women's particular perceptions of uncertainty in genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingzi Zhong
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Jemar R. Bather
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brianne M. Daly
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Wendy K. Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Melody S. Goodman
- Department of Biostatistics, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Erin Rothwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winskill C, Goodman MS, Daly BM, Elrick A, Mooney R, Espinel W, Kohlmann W, Kaphingst KA. Predictors of Women's Intentions to Communicate Updated Genetic Test Results to Immediate and Extended Family Members. Public Health Genomics 2023; 26:24-34. [PMID: 36642066 PMCID: PMC10015742 DOI: 10.1159/000528522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many individuals who previously received negative genetic test results are eligible for updated testing. This study examined intention to communicate updated genetic test results to relatives in participants who previously received negative genetic test results. METHODS Women with a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer who tested negative for BRCA1/2 before 2013 were enrolled between April 2018 and October 2019. Proportions were calculated to assess intention to communicate updated genetic test results to living immediate family, extended family, and all family. Potential predictors of intentions from the theory of planned behavior (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control) were assessed. The three outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear models with a quasi-binomial probability distribution. RESULTS 110 women completed the baseline assessment prior to updated testing. Participants intended to communicate genetic test results to 90% of immediate family, 51% of extended family, and 66% of all living relatives. Participants with higher subjective norms (aOR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.08-3.57) had higher intentions to communicate genetic test results to extended family, while participants with more positive attitudes (aOR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.60) had higher intentions to communicate to all family. Placing higher importance on genetic information was associated with higher intentions to communicate to immediate family (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.06-1.83). Lower subjective numeracy was associated with higher intentions to communicate to extended family (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.76). CONCLUSION Attitudes and subjective norms were predictors of intention to communicate updated genetic information to at-risk biological relatives, and predictors may vary by degree of relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Winskill
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melody S. Goodman
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brianne M. Daly
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communications, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ryan Mooney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Whitney Espinel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Department of Communications, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of UT, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Interest and Utility of MC1R Testing for Melanoma Risk in Dermatology Patients with a History of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. J Skin Cancer 2022; 2022:4046554. [PMID: 35959144 PMCID: PMC9357806 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4046554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Public access to genetic information is increasing, and community dermatologists may progressively encounter patients interested in genetic testing for melanoma risk. Clarifying potential utility will help plan for this inevitability. We determined interest and uptake of genetic risk feedback based on melanocortin receptor gene (MC1R) variants, immediate (two weeks) responses to risk feedback, and test utility at three months in patients (age ≥ 18, with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer). Participants (N = 50) completed a baseline survey and were invited to consider MC1R testing via the study website. Testing interest and uptake were assessed through registration of test decision, request of a saliva test kit, and kit return (all yes/no). Immediate responses to risk feedback included feedback-relevant thoughts, emotions, communication, and information seeking after result receipt; test utility outcomes included family and physician communication and information seeking. Results indicated good retention at both time points (76%; 74%). Half (48%) logged onto the study website, and of these, most (92%) chose testing and (95%) returned a saliva sample. After two weeks, most (94%) had read all the risk feedback information and distress was low (M = 8.81, 7–28, SD = 2.23). Many (69%) had talked with their family about the results. By three months, most had spoken with family (92%) and physicians (80%) about skin cancer risk. Physician communication was higher (70%) in those tested versus those not tested (40%, p = 0.02). The substantial interest and promising outcomes associated with MC1R genetic testing in dermatology patients inform intervention strategies to enhance benefits and minimize risks of skin cancer genetic testing.
Collapse
|
6
|
Meiser B, Butow P, Davies G, Napier CE, Schlub TE, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Best MC. Psychological predictors of cancer patients' and their relatives' attitudes towards the return of genomic sequencing results. Eur J Med Genet 2022; 65:104516. [PMID: 35487418 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
This study assessed the psychological predictors of attitudes toward the return of germline genomic sequencing results in cancer patients and their biological relatives with a likely genetic basis for their cancer diagnosis, who completed a questionnaire prior to undergoing genomic sequencing. Of 602 probands and relatives, 94% of probands and 89% of relatives thought people would like to be informed about single-gene conditions for which there is prevention or treatment. Amongst relatives, this view was associated with higher perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy. Probands (66%) and relatives (59%) thought people would be interested in learning about single-gene conditions for which there is no prevention or treatment. Amongst probands, this view was associated with lower tolerance of uncertainty and amongst relatives with higher self-efficacy. Probands (92%) and relatives (90%) thought people would like to be informed about polygenic conditions that can have a major impact on health. Amongst probands this view was associated with lower perceived susceptibility of cancer recurrence, and amongst relatives, with higher perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy. Probands (86%) and relatives (86%) thought that people would like to be informed about polygenic conditions that can have a lower impact on health, and this view was associated with a lower perceived susceptibility of recurrence amongst probands. Inconclusion, these findings show that individuals' attitudes about the return of results depend on the perceived utility of different types of tests. Therefore, individuals need to gain a clear understanding of test utility, and appropriate consent processes are required to achieve informed choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, 2032, Australia.
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Grace Davies
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Nicci Bartley
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, 2032, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, 2032, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaphingst KA, Bather JR, Daly BM, Chavez-Yenter D, Vega A, Kohlmann WK. Interest in Cancer Predisposition Testing and Carrier Screening Offered as Part of Routine Healthcare Among an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Young Women. Front Genet 2022; 13:866062. [PMID: 35495140 PMCID: PMC9047995 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Sequencing technologies can inform individuals’ risks for multiple conditions, supporting population-level screening approaches. Prior research examining interest in genetic testing has not generally examined the context of population-based approaches offered in routine healthcare or among ethnically diverse populations. Cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening could be offered broadly to women of reproductive age. This study therefore examined interest in these tests when offered as part of routine care, and predictors of interest, among an ethnically diverse sample of women aged 20–35. We conducted an online English-language survey of 450 women; 39% identified as Latina. We examined predictors of interest for two outcomes, interest in testing in the next year and level of interest, in multivariable logistic regression models and stratified analyses by Latina ethnicity. More than half of respondents reported being interested in cancer predisposition testing (55%) and carrier screening (56%) in the next year; this did not differ by ethnicity. About 26% reported being very interested in cancer predisposition testing and 27% in carrier screening. Latina respondents (32%) were more likely to be very interested in cancer predisposition testing than non-Latina respondents (22%; p < 0.03). In multivariable models, having higher worry about genetic risks, higher genetic knowledge, and higher perceived importance of genetic information were associated with higher interest across multiple models. Predictors of interest were generally similar by ethnicity. Our findings show substantial interest in both cancer predisposition testing and carrier screening among young women as part of routine healthcare with similar interest between Latina and non-Latina women. Efforts to broadly offer such testing could be important in improving access to genetic information. It will be critical to develop tools to help healthcare providers communicate about genetic testing and to address the needs of those who have less prior knowledge about genetics to support informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- *Correspondence: Kimberly A. Kaphingst,
| | - Jemar R. Bather
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brianne M. Daly
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Alexis Vega
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Wendy K. Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Napier CE, Davies G, Butow PN, Schlub TE, Best MC, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Meiser B, Tucker KM, Biesecker BB, Thomas DM, Ballinger ML. Cancer patient knowledge about and behavioral intentions after germline genome sequencing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:707-718. [PMID: 34247865 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Germline genome sequencing (GS) is becoming mainstream in cancer diagnosis and risk management. Identifying knowledge gaps and determinants of health behavior change intentions will enable effective targeting of educational and management strategies to translate genomic findings into improved cancer outcomes. METHODS Probands diagnosed with cancer of likely genetic origin that consented to but not yet undergone GS, and their biological relatives, completed a cross-sectional questionnaire assessing GS knowledge and hypothetical intention to change behaviors. RESULTS Probands (n = 348; 57% university educated) and relatives (n = 213; 38% university educated) had moderate GS knowledge levels, with greater knowledge associated with higher education. Both populations reported high behavioral change intentions, significantly associated with being female (p = 0.01) and greater perceived importance of GS (p < 0.001), and for probands: being from English-speaking households (p = 0.003), higher socio-economic status (p = 0.01) and greater self-efficacy (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Increasing GS knowledge will enable realistic participant expectations surrounding germline GS. Actual behavior change should be monitored to determine whether increased cancer risk knowledge results in altered cancer-related behavior and ultimately, cancer outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Educational resources should target specific populations to ensure informed decision-making and expectation management. Support tools facilitating and maintaining behavioral change may be needed to achieve improved cancer patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Napier
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Grace Davies
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, Australia; University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicci Bartley
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Newborn Screening, Ethics and Disability Studies, RTI International, Washington, DC, USA
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meiser B, Butow P, Davies G, Napier CE, Schlub TE, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Tucker K, Goldstein D, Biesecker BB, Best MC. Psychological predictors of advanced cancer patients' preferences for return of results from comprehensive tumor genomic profiling. Am J Med Genet A 2021; 188:725-734. [PMID: 34755933 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
This study assessed the psychological predictors of preferences for return of comprehensive tumor genomic profiling (CTGP) results in patients with advanced cancers, enrolled in the Molecular Screening and Therapeutics Program. Patients completed a questionnaire prior to undergoing CTGP. Of the 1434 who completed a questionnaire, 96% would like to receive results that can guide treatment for their cancer, and preference for receiving this type of result was associated with lower tolerance of uncertainty. Sixty-four percent would like to receive results that cannot guide treatment, and lower tolerance of uncertainty, self-efficacy, and perceived importance were associated with this preference. Fifty-nine percent would like to receive variants of unknown significance, which was associated with lower tolerance of uncertainty, higher self-efficacy, and perceived importance. Eighty-six percent wanted to receive germline results that could inform family risk. This was associated with higher self-efficacy, perceived importance, and perceived susceptibility. Although most patients wanted to receive all types of results, given the differing patient preferences regarding the return of results depending on the utility of the different types of results, it appears critical to safeguard patient understanding of result utility to achieve informed patient choices. This should be accompanied by appropriate consent processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grace Davies
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicci Bartley
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Megan C Best
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute for Ethics and Society, University of Notre Dame Australia, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dreisiebner S, März S, Mandl T. Information behavior during the Covid-19 crisis in German-speaking countries. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/jd-12-2020-0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the impact of the Covid-19 crisis at the level of individual information behavior among citizens from the German-speaking countries, Austria, Germany and Switzerland.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted among 308 participants gathered through convenience sampling in April and May 2020, focusing on how citizens changed their mix and usage intensity of information sources and according to which criteria they chose them during the Covid-19 crisis. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for testing central tendencies. Effect sizes were considered to support the interpretation.FindingsThe results show first that the Covid-19 crisis has led to an increased demand for reliable information. This goes alongside a significant increased use of public broadcasting, newspapers and information provided by public organizations. Second, the majority (84%) of the participants reported being satisfied with the information supply during the Covid-19 crisis. Participants who were less satisfied with the information supply used reliable sources significantly less frequently, specifically public television, national newspapers and information provided by public organizations. Third, the amount of Covid-19-related information led some participants to a feeling of information overload, which resulted in a reduction of information seeking and media use.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the first to analyze changes of information behavior patterns of individuals during crises in the current information environment, considering the diversity of resources used by individuals.
Collapse
|
11
|
Behavioral and Psychological Outcomes Associated with Skin Cancer Genetic Testing in Albuquerque Primary Care. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164053. [PMID: 34439206 PMCID: PMC8394482 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Genetic information is publicly available but research examining the best use of such information has not engaged diverse members of the public. We examined public reactions to melanoma genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in a study randomizing (like the flip of a coin) 600 diverse primary care patients to a MC1R test offer or usual care. We found that testing did not improve sun protection and skin cancer screening, nor did it lead worry to increase. However, groups less aware of their skin cancer risk, including those who thought their risk was “unlikely” at the start of the study, showed significant improvements in sun protection at three months. In conclusion, testing might be very helpful for certain people who have the most to learn about their risk, who may become motivated to protect themselves from the damaging effects of the sun as a result of skin cancer genetic testing. Abstract Public availability of genetic information is increasing; thus, efforts to improve diversity in basic and translational research in genomics is a top priority. Given the increasing U.S. incidence and mortality of melanoma, and the prevalence of common melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene melanoma risk variants in the general population, we examined genomic testing of MC1R for skin cancer risk in a randomized controlled trial in Albuquerque, New Mexico primary care. Participants were 48% Hispanic and were randomized 5:1 to a MC1R test invitation or usual care. We assessed 3 month sun protection, skin cancer screening, and skin cancer worry outcomes associated with testing, and key effect moderators (e.g., cancer risk perceptions, and skin cancer risk factors). Our findings indicate that the primary outcomes were unchanged by the MC1R test offer, test acceptance, and level of risk feedback. Moderator analyses showed that those with lower risk perception, and those with skin that readily tans, significantly increased their sun protection in response to higher than average risk feedback. Risk feedback did not prompt cancer worry, and average risk feedback did not erode existing sun protection. This study paves the way for the development of tailored strategies to address low skin cancer risk awareness in this understudied context of public health genomics.
Collapse
|
12
|
Banerjee SC, Sussman A, Schofield E, Guest DD, Dailey YS, Schwartz MR, Buller DB, Hunley K, Kaphingst K, Berwick M, Hay JL. "Let's Talk about Skin Cancer": Examining Association between Family Communication about Skin Cancer, Perceived Risk, and Sun Protection Behaviors. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 26:576-585. [PMID: 34612176 PMCID: PMC8513818 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1966686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Family communication about skin cancer risk may motivate protective behaviors. However, it is unclear how widespread such communication might be. In this study, we describe prevalence and patterns (across environmental, personal, and behavioral factors) of family communication about skin cancer across N = 600 diverse (79% female, 48% Hispanic, 44% non-Hispanic White) primary care patients from Albuquerque, New Mexico, a geographical location with year-round sun exposure. Over half reported discussing general cancer (77%) and skin cancer risks (66%) with their families. The most frequent target of skin cancer risk communication included doctors (54%), followed by friends/coworkers (49%), spouse/partner (43%), other family members (38%), sisters (36%), mothers (36%), daughters (33%), sons (32%), father (24%), and brothers (22%). On average, participants reported having talked to three family members about skin cancer risks. The most frequently discussed content of skin cancer risk communication was the use of sun protection (89%), followed by the personal risk of skin cancer (68%), who had skin cancer in the family (60%), family risk of skin cancer (59%), time of sun exposure (57%), and skin cancer screening (57%). A family or personal history of cancer, higher perceived risk, higher health literacy, being non-Hispanic, having higher education or income, and proactive sun protective behavior were associated with greater family communication about general cancer and skin cancer risks. These study findings have implications for interventions that encourage discussions about skin cancer risk, sun protection, and skin cancer screening that lead to adoption of sun-safe behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kim Kaphingst
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Butow P, Davies G, Napier CE, Bartley N, Ballinger ML, Biesecker B, Juraskova I, Meiser B, Schlub T, Thomas DM, Goldstein D, Best MC. Value of whole-genome sequencing to Australian cancer patients and their first-degree relatives participating in a genomic sequencing study. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:96-108. [PMID: 34218500 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Genomic Sequencing (GS) to identify high cancer risk will soon enter clinical practice at significant cost to the health system. This study aimed to quantify perceived value of GS to Australian cancer patients and their first-degree relatives participating in a genomic sequencing study, and factors associated with value. Participants were recruited upon consent to the genomics study. Eligible participants (with cancer of likely genetic etiology, or a first-degree relative) completed a questionnaire prior to GS. Willingness to pay was assessed via hypothetical trade-off scenarios of actionable result return rates of 1%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50%. Of 348 probands and 213 relatives (92% and 93% response rate), 81% would consistently have GS for as little as a 1% actionable return rate. Participants would pay a median of $1,000 for return rates of at least 20% (probands) or 30% (relatives), and $300 for lower return rates. Probands with common cancers and negative attitudes to uncertainty were more likely to have GS; those with higher education were more willing to pay $1,000 and $3,000 for lower return rates. This study found high interest in, but lower willingness to pay for GS in cancer patients and their first-degree relatives, possibly due to inability to pay. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of how individuals in different risk circumstances, trade-off the risks, harms, and benefits of GS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Grace Davies
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicci Bartley
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy Schlub
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mallen AR, Conley CC, Fuzzell L, Ketcher D, Augusto BM, McIntyre M, Barton LV, Townsend MK, Fridley BL, Tworoger SS, Wenham RM, Vadaparampil ST. "I think that a brief conversation from their provider can go a very long way": Patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators of genetic testing after ovarian cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:2663-2677. [PMID: 32975643 PMCID: PMC7981241 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05779-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors impacting genetic counseling/testing among ovarian cancer patients guided by Green and Kreuter's PRECEDE-PROCEED model. METHODS Gynecologic oncology providers (N = 4), genetic counselors (N = 4), and ovarian cancer patients (N = 9) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring participants' knowledge of and experiences with genetic counseling/testing. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis by two independent raters. RESULTS Thematic analysis identified predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors impacting referral for and uptake of genetic counseling/testing. Predisposing factors included participant's knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes related to genetic counseling/testing. Both patients and providers also cited that insurance coverage and out-of-pocket cost are major concerns for ovarian cancer patients considering genetic testing. Finally, both patients and providers emphasized that genetic counseling/testing would provide additional information to an ovarian cancer patient. While providers emphasized that genetic testing results were useful for informing a patient's personal treatment plan, patients emphasized that this knowledge would be beneficial for their family members. CONCLUSION Barriers to genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients exist at multiple levels, including the patient (e.g., knowledge, attitudes), the provider (e.g., workload, availability of services), the institution (e.g., difficulty with referrals/scheduling), and the healthcare system (e.g., insurance/cost). Interventions aiming to increase genetic testing among ovarian cancer patients will likely need to target multiple levels of influence. Future quantitative studies are needed to replicate these results. This line of work will inform specific multilevel intervention strategies that are adaptable to different practice settings, ultimately improving guideline concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrianne R. Mallen
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampa, FL
| | - Claire C. Conley
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Tampa, FL
- Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Washington, DC
| | - Lindsay Fuzzell
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Tampa, FL
| | - Dana Ketcher
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Tampa, FL
| | - Bianca M. Augusto
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Tampa, FL
| | - McKenzie McIntyre
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Mary K. Townsend
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, FL
| | - Brooke L. Fridley
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Robert M. Wenham
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bartley N, Napier CE, Butt Z, Schlub TE, Best MC, Biesecker BB, Ballinger ML, Butow P. Cancer Patient Experience of Uncertainty While Waiting for Genome Sequencing Results. Front Psychol 2021; 12:647502. [PMID: 33967906 PMCID: PMC8100530 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is limited knowledge about cancer patients' experiences of uncertainty while waiting for genome sequencing results, and whether prolonged uncertainty contributes to psychological factors in this context. To investigate uncertainty in patients with a cancer of likely hereditary origin while waiting for genome sequencing results, we collected questionnaire and interview data at baseline, and at three and 12 months follow up (prior to receiving results). Participants (N = 353) had negative attitudes towards uncertainty (M = 4.03, SD 0.68) at baseline, and low levels of uncertainty at three (M = 8.23, SD 7.37) and 12 months (M = 7.95, SD 7.64). Uncertainty about genome sequencing did not change significantly over time [t(210) = 0.660, p = 0.510]. Greater perceived susceptibility for cancer [r(348) = 0.14, p < 0.01], fear of cancer recurrence [r(348) = 0.19, p < 0.01], perceived importance of genome sequencing [r(350) = 0.24, p < 0.01], intention to change behavior if a gene variant indicating risk is found [r(349) = 0.29, p < 0.01], perceived ability to cope with results [r(349) = 0.36, p < 0.01], and satisfaction with decision to have genome sequencing [r(350) = 0.52, p < 0.01] were significantly correlated with negative attitudes towards uncertainty at baseline. Multiple primary cancer diagnoses [B = -2.364 [-4.238, -0.491], p = 0.014], lower perceived ability to cope with results [B = -0.1.881 [-3.403, -0.359], p = 0.016] at baseline, greater anxiety about genome sequencing (avoidance) [B = 0.347 [0.148, 0.546], p = 0.0012] at 3 months, and greater perceived uncertainty about genome sequencing [B = 0.494 [0.267, 0.721] p = 0.000] at 3 months significantly predicted greater perceived uncertainty about genome sequencing at 12 months. Greater perceived uncertainty about genome sequencing at 3 months significantly predicted greater anxiety (avoidance) about genome sequencing at 12 months [B = 0.291 [0.072, 0.509], p = 0.009]. Semi-structured interviews revealed that while participants were motivated to pursue genome sequencing as a strategy to reduce their illness and risk uncertainty, genome sequencing generated additional practical, scientific and personal uncertainties. Some uncertainties were consistently discussed over the 12 months, while others emerged over time. Similarly, some uncertainty coping strategies were consistent over time, while others emerged while patients waited for their genome sequencing results. This study demonstrates the complexity of uncertainty generated by genome sequencing for cancer patients and provides further support for the inter-relationship between uncertainty and anxiety. Helping patients manage their uncertainty may ameliorate psychological morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicci Bartley
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine E Napier
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Zoe Butt
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan C Best
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Institute for Ethics & Society, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lo SN, Smit AK, Espinoza D, Cust AE. The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study randomised controlled trial: statistical analysis plan. Trials 2020; 21:594. [PMID: 32605576 PMCID: PMC7329549 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04351-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study is a randomised controlled trial that aims to evaluate the efficacy of providing information on personal genomic risk of melanoma in reducing ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure, stratified by traditional risk group (low or high phenotypic risk) in the general population. The primary outcome is objectively measured total daily Standard Erythemal Doses at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include UV exposure at specific time periods, self-reported sun protection and skin-examination behaviours, psychosocial outcomes, and ethical considerations surrounding offering genomic testing at a population level. A within-trial and modelled economic evaluation will be undertaken from an Australian health system perspective to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Objective To publish the pre-determined statistical analysis plan (SAP) before database lock and the start of analysis. Methods This SAP describes the data synthesis, analysis principles and statistical procedures for analysing the outcomes from this trial. The SAP was approved after closure of recruitment and before completion of patient follow-up. It outlines the planned primary analyses and a range of subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Health economic outcomes are not included in this plan but will be analysed separately. The SAP will be adhered to for the final data analysis of this trial to avoid potential analysis bias that may arise from knowledge of the outcome data. Results This SAP is consistent with best practice and should enable transparent reporting. Conclusion This SAP has been developed for the Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk Study and will be followed to ensure high-quality standards of internal validity and to minimise analysis bias. Trial registration Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTR N12617000691347. Registered on 15 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serigne N Lo
- The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amelia K Smit
- The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Espinoza
- The University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- The University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Davies G, Butow P, Napier CE, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Meiser B, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Schlub TE, Best MC. Advanced Cancer Patient Knowledge of and Attitudes towards Tumor Molecular Profiling. Transl Oncol 2020; 13:100799. [PMID: 32450551 PMCID: PMC7256320 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Limited research has indicated that despite their overwhelming interest in tumor molecular profiling (MP),1 cancer patients have poor knowledge about MP. The current study aimed to investigate demographic and psychological predictors of knowledge and perceived importance of MP in an advanced cancer patient cohort. Eligible participants had advanced solid cancers of any histological type with sufficient accessible tissue for MP and were enrolled in the Molecular Screening and Therapeutics (MoST) Program. A questionnaire was completed by 1074 participants (91% response rate) after consent, prior to undergoing MP. Overall, participants had poor to moderate knowledge of MP, yet perceived MP to have high importance. Higher education, speaking English at home, and greater satisfaction with the decision to undergo MP were associated with higher knowledge scores. More negative attitudes towards uncertainty, greater self-efficacy to cope with results, and lower perceived likelihood of cancer progression were associated with greater perceived importance of MP. Less educated participants and those who do not speak English at home will need clear explanations, visual aids and ample opportunity to ask questions about MP at the time of their decision-making. Clinicians also need to consider psychological factors relevant to patients' decision to pursue MP. Given the increased awareness of and demand for cancer genomic information and the rapidly changing nature of the actionability of MP, these findings will help inform an important ongoing debate on how to facilitate ethical and informed consent and manage patient expectations about personalized treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Davies
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Phyllis Butow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Christine E Napier
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - Nicci Bartley
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia.
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Megan C Best
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Butow P, Davies G, Napier CE, Schlub T, Best MC, Bartley N, Juraskova I, Meiser B, Ballinger ML, Biesecker B, Goldstein D, Thomas DM. Assessment of the Value of Tumor Variation Profiling Perceived by Patients With Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e204721. [PMID: 32407502 PMCID: PMC7225901 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Use of tumor molecular profiling (MP) is entering routine clinical practice; however, little is known about how much and why patients value MP. OBJECTIVE To examine the perceived value of MP to patients with advanced cancer and factors associated with perceived value. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional survey that included willingness-to-pay trade-off scenarios was administered to participants after consent and before MP. A total of 777 participants (94% response rate) were recruited from the Molecular Screening and Therapeutics Program. Eligible patients had advanced solid cancers of any histologic type, were receiving or had completed their last line of effective therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0 to 3, and had sufficient accessible tissue for MP. The participants were recruited between October 24, 2017, and March 12, 2019, and data analysis was conducted from March 13 to April 14, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Willingness to pay for MP was assessed via hypothetical trade-off scenarios varying in the actionable return rate (1%, 20%, or 40%) and cost (A$0, A$300 [US$210], A$1000 [US $700], A$3000 [US $2100], or A$10 000 [US $7000]). Ordinal regressions were used to explore factors associated with willingness to have and pay for MP. RESULTS Of 777 participants (405 women [52%]; mean [SD] age, 55.47 [14.26] years), 689 patients (89%) would have MP for as little as a 1% actionable return rate. Fifty-six patients (7%) would require at least a 20% return rate and 11 patients (1%) would require at least a 40% return rate. Fifteen patients (2%) consistently chose not to have the test; 6 participants (0.8%) had missing values on this item. Participants were willing to pay a median of A$1000 if the actionable return rate was 1% and A$3000 for an actionable return rate of 20% to 40%. Of 762 individuals who agreed to testing, 482 patients (64%) were consistently unwilling to pay A$10 000, regardless of the actionable return rate. Patients born in Australia or New Zealand were more likely to want MP (eg, participants born in South Asia had an ordered odds for the tipping point of 7.74 [95% CI, 1.67-36.05; P = .009] times higher than Australian- and/or New Zealand-born participants). Patients born in Australia or New Zealand were also more willing to pay A$1000 or A$3000 (eg, participants born in Western Europe had an ordered odds for the tipping point for paying A$1000 of 1.74 [95% CI, 1.01-3.00; P = .048] times higher than Australian- and/or New Zealand-born participants). People with a medical- or science-related occupation and with more negative attitudes toward uncertainty were more likely to pay A$10 000 (eg, A$10 000 tipping point-ordered odds of participants with a medical- or science-related occupation was 0.49 [95% CI, 0.7-0.87; P = .02] times that of participants without a medical- or science-related occupation). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found apparent high interest in but lower willingness to pay for MP among patients with advanced cancer. Ability to pay may limit access to MP. Ongoing societal debate is required to establish the value of MP and whether subsidization is needed to ensure equity of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grace Davies
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine E. Napier
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan C. Best
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Bartley
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney School of Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mandy L. Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - David Goldstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David M. Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hay JL, Meyer White K, Sussman A, Kaphingst K, Guest D, Schofield E, Dailey YT, Robers E, Schwartz MR, Zielaskowski K, Li Y, Buller D, Hunley K, Berwick M. Psychosocial and Cultural Determinants of Interest and Uptake of Skin Cancer Genetic Testing in Diverse Primary Care. Public Health Genomics 2019; 22:58-68. [PMID: 31437847 DOI: 10.1159/000501985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translational research in genomics has limited reach and requires efforts to broaden access and utility in diverse populations. Skin cancer is common and rates are rising, including among Hispanics. Germline variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene are common in the population and confer moderate risk for melanoma and basal cell cancers across skin types. Feedback about MC1R risk status may promote skin cancer risk awareness and risk reduction. AIMS We examined the level of interest in pursuing MC1R testing, and patterns of interest across skin cancer perceived threat and control attitudes, cultural beliefs (family influence on health, health system distrust, cancer fatalism, skin cancer misconceptions), and health literacy. METHODS We used a study website to inform primary care patients in Albuquerque, NM about the benefits and drawbacks of MC1R testing. Website logon, request of a saliva test kit, and return of the test kit (yes vs. no) were primary assessments of study interest and uptake. RESULTS Of 499 participants provided with a test offer, 33% requested and returned the test. Lower family influence on participants' health was an important factor both overall and within ethnicity subgroups, and may indicate that primary care patients interested in skin cancer genetic testing see themselves as proactive health seekers, independent from family encouragement. Lower self-efficacy for skin cancer prevention was also an important characteristic of those who tested. CONCLUSION As evidence for common genetic markers for skin cancer accumulates, these findings suggest characteristics of those most likely to pursue genetic testing for skin cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Hay
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA,
| | | | | | - Kim Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Dolores Guest
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | | | - Erika Robers
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | | | | - Yuelin Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Keith Hunley
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hong SJ, Biesecker B, Ivanovich J, Goodman M, Kaphingst KA. Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:543-557. [PMID: 30675956 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Information-seeking models typically focus on information-seeking behaviors based on individuals' interest in information, because their current level is perceived to be insufficient. In the context of genetic risk information (GRI), however, information insufficiency is difficult to measure and thus can limit understanding of information behavior in the context of GRI. We propose that an individual's need for information might be a more direct and conceptually clearer alternative to predicting their information-seeking behavior. To test this hypothesis, this study investigates the extent to which previously identified factors affecting interest in GRI are also predictors of need for GRI among women diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 40 or younger (N = 1,069). As hypothesized, there was a positive association between interest in and need for GRI. Furthermore, hypothesized factors of numeracy, information orientation, and genetic knowledge were significant predictors of increased interest in and need for GRI. In contrast, hypothesized factors of genetic worry and genetic causal belief predicted increased interest in GRI only, while genetic self-efficacy predicted increased need for GRI only. As hypothesized, BRCA status significantly moderated associations between informational norm and both interest in and need for GRI. Collectively, the findings support inclusion of need for GRI in theoretical information-seeking models in the context of genomic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smit AK, Newson AJ, Morton RL, Kimlin M, Keogh L, Law MH, Kirk J, Dobbinson S, Kanetsky PA, Fenton G, Allen M, Butow P, Dunlop K, Trevena L, Lo S, Savard J, Dawkins H, Wordsworth S, Jenkins M, Mann GJ, Cust AE. The melanoma genomics managing your risk study: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of personal genomic risk information on skin cancer prevention behaviors. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 70:106-116. [PMID: 29802966 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure and improving early detection may reduce melanoma incidence, mortality and health system costs. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of providing information on personal genomic risk of melanoma in reducing UV exposure at 12 months, according to low and high traditional risk. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, participants (target sample = 892) will be recruited from the general population, and randomized (1:1 ratio, intervention versus control). Intervention arm participants provide a saliva sample, receive personalized melanoma genomic risk information, a genetic counselor phone call, and an educational booklet on melanoma prevention. Control arm participants receive only the educational booklet. Eligible participants are aged 18-69 years, have European ancestry and no personal history of melanoma. All participants will complete a questionnaire and wear a UV dosimeter to objectively measure their sun exposure at baseline, 1- and 12-month time-points, except 1-month UV dosimetry will be limited to ~250 participants. The primary outcome is total daily Standard Erythemal Doses at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include objectively measured UV exposure for specific time periods (e.g. midday hours), self-reported sun protection and skin-examination behaviors, psycho-social outcomes, and ethical considerations surrounding offering genomic testing at a population level. A within-trial and modelled economic evaluation will be undertaken from an Australian health system perspective to assess the intervention costs and outcomes. DISCUSSION This trial will inform the clinical and personal utility of introducing genomic testing into the health system for melanoma prevention and early detection at a population-level. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000691347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Michael Kimlin
- University of the Sunshine Coast and Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Matthew H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Locked Bag 2000, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Judy Kirk
- Westmead Clinical School and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dobbinson
- Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Peter A Kanetsky
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - Georgina Fenton
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Martin Allen
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kate Dunlop
- The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Level 5 2c Herbert Street St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Serigne Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Hugh Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Government of Western Australia, Level 3 C Block 189 Royal Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, The University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Best M, Newson AJ, Meiser B, Juraskova I, Goldstein D, Tucker K, Ballinger ML, Hess D, Schlub TE, Biesecker B, Vines R, Vines K, Thomas D, Young MA, Savard J, Jacobs C, Butow P. The PiGeOn project: protocol of a longitudinal study examining psychosocial and ethical issues and outcomes in germline genomic sequencing for cancer. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:454. [PMID: 29685123 PMCID: PMC5914013 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4366-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in genomics offer promise for earlier detection or prevention of cancer, by personalisation of medical care tailored to an individual’s genomic risk status. However genome sequencing can generate an unprecedented volume of results for the patient to process with potential implications for their families and reproductive choices. This paper describes a protocol for a study (PiGeOn) that aims to explore how patients and their blood relatives experience germline genomic sequencing, to help guide the appropriate future implementation of genome sequencing into routine clinical practice. Methods We have designed a mixed-methods, prospective, cohort sub-study of a germline genomic sequencing study that targets adults with cancer suggestive of a genetic aetiology. One thousand probands and 2000 of their blood relatives will undergo germline genomic sequencing as part of the parent study in Sydney, Australia between 2016 and 2020. Test results are expected within12–15 months of recruitment. For the PiGeOn sub-study, participants will be invited to complete surveys at baseline, three months and twelve months after baseline using self-administered questionnaires, to assess the experience of long waits for results (despite being informed that results may not be returned) and expectations of receiving them. Subsets of both probands and blood relatives will be purposively sampled and invited to participate in three semi-structured qualitative interviews (at baseline and each follow-up) to triangulate the data. Ethical themes identified in the data will be used to inform critical revisions of normative ethical concepts or frameworks. Discussion This will be one of the first studies internationally to follow the psychosocial impact on probands and their blood relatives who undergo germline genome sequencing, over time. Study results will inform ongoing ethical debates on issues such as informed consent for genomic sequencing, and informing participants and their relatives of specific results. The study will also provide important outcome data concerning the psychological impact of prolonged waiting for germline genomic sequencing. These data are needed to ensure that when germline genomic sequencing is introduced into standard clinical settings, ethical concepts are embedded, and patients and their relatives are adequately prepared and supported during and after the testing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Best
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Dominique Hess
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Barbara Biesecker
- National Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Richard Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - Kate Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - David Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Genome One, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Best M, Newson AJ, Meiser B, Juraskova I, Goldstein D, Tucker K, Ballinger ML, Hess D, Schlub TE, Biesecker B, Vines R, Vines K, Thomas D, Young MA, Savard J, Jacobs C, Butow P. The PiGeOn project: protocol for a longitudinal study examining psychosocial, behavioural and ethical issues and outcomes in cancer tumour genomic profiling. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:389. [PMID: 29621994 PMCID: PMC5887192 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4310-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic sequencing in cancer (both tumour and germline), and development of therapies targeted to tumour genetic status, hold great promise for improvement of patient outcomes. However, the imminent introduction of genomics into clinical practice calls for better understanding of how patients value, experience, and cope with this novel technology and its often complex results. Here we describe a protocol for a novel mixed-methods, prospective study (PiGeOn) that aims to examine patients’ psychosocial, cognitive, affective and behavioural responses to tumour genomic profiling and to integrate a parallel critical ethical analysis of returning results. Methods This is a cohort sub-study of a parent tumour genomic profiling programme enrolling patients with advanced cancer. One thousand patients will be recruited for the parent study in Sydney, Australia from 2016 to 2019. They will be asked to complete surveys at baseline, three, and five months. Primary outcomes are: knowledge, preferences, attitudes and values. A purposively sampled subset of patients will be asked to participate in three semi-structured interviews (at each time point) to provide deeper data interpretation. Relevant ethical themes will be critically analysed to iteratively develop or refine normative ethical concepts or frameworks currently used in the return of genetic information. Discussion This will be the first Australian study to collect longitudinal data on cancer patients’ experience of tumour genomic profiling. Findings will be used to inform ongoing ethical debates on issues such as how to effectively obtain informed consent for genomic profiling return results, distinguish between research and clinical practice and manage patient expectations. The combination of quantitative and qualitative methods will provide comprehensive and critical data on how patients cope with ‘actionable’ and ‘non-actionable’ results. This information is needed to ensure that when tumour genomic profiling becomes part of routine clinical care, ethical considerations are embedded, and patients are adequately prepared and supported during and after receiving results. Trial registration Not required for this sub-study, parent trial registration ACTRN12616000908437.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Best
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Dominique Hess
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Barbara Biesecker
- The National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, MSC 2073, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Richard Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - Kate Vines
- Rare Cancers, PO Box 440, Bowral, NSW, 2576, Australia
| | - David Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Genome One, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2021, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED - Psychology), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wessel J, Marrero D. Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes in High-Risk Children: the Case for Primordial Prevention. RESEARCH IDEAS AND OUTCOMES 2017. [DOI: 10.3897/rio.3.e20695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
25
|
Hay JL, Berwick M, Zielaskowski K, White KA, Rodríguez VM, Robers E, Guest DD, Sussman A, Talamantes Y, Schwartz MR, Greb J, Bigney J, Kaphingst KA, Hunley K, Buller DB. Implementing an Internet-Delivered Skin Cancer Genetic Testing Intervention to Improve Sun Protection Behavior in a Diverse Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2017; 6:e52. [PMID: 28442450 PMCID: PMC5424125 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Revised: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limited translational genomic research currently exists to guide the availability, comprehension, and appropriate use of personalized genomics in diverse general population subgroups. Melanoma skin cancers are preventable, curable, common in the general population, and disproportionately increasing in Hispanics. Objective Variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene are present in approximately 50% of the population, are major factors in determining sun sensitivity, and confer a 2-to-3-fold increase in melanoma risk in the general population, even in populations with darker skin. Therefore, feedback regarding MC1R risk status may raise risk awareness and protective behavior in the general population. Methods We are conducting a randomized controlled trial examining Internet presentation of the risks and benefits of personalized genomic testing for MC1R gene variants that are associated with increased melanoma risk. We will enroll a total of 885 participants (462 participants are currently enrolled), who will be randomized 6:1 to personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk versus waiting list control. Control participants will be offered testing after outcome assessments. Participants will be balanced across self-reported Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity (n=750 in personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk arm; n=135 in control arm), and will be recruited from a general population cohort in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which is subject to year-round sun exposure. Baseline surveys will be completed in-person with study staff and follow-up measures will be completed via telephone. Results Aim 1 of the trial will examine the personal utility of personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk in terms of short-term (3-month) sun protection and skin screening behaviors, family and physician communication, and melanoma threat and control beliefs (ie, putative mediators of behavior change). We will also examine potential unintended consequences of testing among those who receive average-risk personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk findings, and examine predictors of sun protection at 3 months as the outcome. These findings will be used to develop messages for groups that receive average-risk feedback. Aim 2 will compare rates of test consideration in Hispanics versus non-Hispanics, including consideration of testing pros and cons and registration of a decision to either accept or decline testing. Aim 3 will examine personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk feedback comprehension, recall, satisfaction, and cancer-related distress in those who undergo testing, and whether these outcomes differ by ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic), or sociocultural or demographic factors. Final outcome data collection is anticipated to be complete by October 2017, at which point data analysis will commence. Conclusions This study has important implications for personalized genomics in the context of melanoma risk, and may be broadly applicable as a model for delivery of personalized genomic feedback for other health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Hay
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Kate Zielaskowski
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | | - Erika Robers
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | - Andrew Sussman
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | | | - Jennie Greb
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | - Jessica Bigney
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | - Keith Hunley
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fogel AL, Jaju PD, Li S, Halpern-Felsher B, Tang JY, Sarin KY. Factors influencing and modifying the decision to pursue genetic testing for skin cancer risk. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76:829-835.e1. [PMID: 28087134 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across cancers, the decision to pursue genetic testing is influenced more by subjective than objective factors. However, skin cancer, which is more prevalent, visual, and multifactorial than many other malignancies, may offer different motivations for pursuing such testing. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine factors influencing the decision to receive genetic testing for skin cancer risk. A secondary objective was to assess the impact of priming with health questions on the decision to receive testing. METHODS We distributed anonymous online surveys through ResearchMatch.org to assess participant health, demographics, motivations, and interest in pursuing genetic testing for skin cancer risk. Two surveys with identical questions but different question ordering were used to assess the secondary objective. RESULTS We received 3783 responses (64% response rate), and 85.8% desired testing. Subjective factors, including curiosity, perceptions of skin cancer, and anxiety, were the most statistically significant determinants of the decision to pursue testing (P < .001), followed by history of sun exposure (odds ratio 1.85, P < .01) and history of skin cancer (odds ratio 0.5, P = .01). Age and family history of skin cancer did not influence this decision. Participants increasingly chose testing if first queried about health behaviors (P < .0001). LIMITATIONS The decision to pursue hypothetical testing may differ from in-clinic decision-making. Self-selected, online participants may differ from the general population. Surveys may be subject to response bias. CONCLUSION The decision to pursue genetic testing for skin cancer is primarily determined by subjective factors, such as anxiety and curiosity. Health factors, including skin cancer history, also influenced decision-making. Priming with consideration of objective health factors can increase the desire to pursue testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Fogel
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Prajakta D Jaju
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Shufeng Li
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jean Y Tang
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kavita Y Sarin
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Smit AK, Espinoza D, Newson AJ, Morton RL, Fenton G, Freeman L, Dunlop K, Butow PN, Law MH, Kimlin MG, Keogh LA, Dobbinson SJ, Kirk J, Kanetsky PA, Mann GJ, Cust AE. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Giving Information on Personalized Genomic Risk of Melanoma to the Public. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 26:212-221. [PMID: 27702805 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication of personalized melanoma genomic risk information may improve melanoma prevention behaviors. METHODS We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of communicating personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public and its preliminary impact on behaviors and psychosocial outcomes. One hundred eighteen people aged 22 to 69 years provided a saliva sample and were randomized to the control (nonpersonalized educational materials) or intervention (personalized booklet presenting melanoma genomic risk as absolute and relative risks and a risk category based on variants in 21 genes, telephone-based genetic counseling, and nonpersonalized educational materials). Intention-to-treat analyses overall and by-risk category were conducted using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values. RESULTS Consent to participate was 41%, 99% were successfully genotyped, and 92% completed 3-month follow-up. Intervention participants reported high satisfaction with the personalized booklet (mean = 8.6, SD = 1.6; on a 0-10 scale) and genetic counseling (mean = 8.1, SD = 2.2). No significant behavioral effects at 3-month follow-up were identified between intervention and control groups overall: objectively measured standard erythemal doses per day [-16%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -43% to 24%] and sun protection index (0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.18). There was increased confidence identifying melanoma at 3 months (0.40; 95% CI, 0.10-0.69). Stratified by risk category, effect sizes for intentional tanning and some individual sun protection items appeared stronger for the average-risk group. There were no appreciable group differences in skin cancer-related worry or psychologic distress. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate feasibility and acceptability of providing personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public. IMPACT Genomic risk information has potential as a melanoma prevention strategy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 212-21. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - David Espinoza
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina Fenton
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.,The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lucinda Freeman
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.,The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate Dunlop
- The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael G Kimlin
- The University of the Sunshine Coast and Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Judy Kirk
- Westmead Clinical School, and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter A Kanetsky
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Graham J Mann
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia. .,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Elrick A, Ashida S, Ivanovich J, Lyons S, Biesecker BB, Goodman MS, Kaphingst KA. Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:173-181. [PMID: 27422778 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9995-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Genetic test results have medical implications beyond the patient that extend to biological family members. We examined psychosocial and clinical factors associated with communication of genetic test results within families. Women (N = 1080) diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger completed an online survey; 920 women that reported prior cancer genetic testing were included in analysis. We examined the proportion of immediate family members to whom they communicated genetic test results, and built multivariable regression models to examine clinical and psychosocial variables associated with the proportion score. Participants were most likely to communicate test results to their mother (83 %) and least likely to their son (45 %). Participants who carried a BRCA mutation (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI = 1.06, 1.70), had higher interest in genomic information (OR = 1.55; 95 % CI = 1.26, 1.91) and lower genetic worry (OR = 0.91; 95 % CI = 0.86, 0.96) communicated genetic test results to a greater proportion of their immediate family members. Participants with a BRCA1/2 mutation shared their genetic test results with more male family members (OR = 1.72; 95 % CI = 1.02, 2.89). Our findings suggest that patients with high worry about genetic risks, low interest in genomic information, or receive a negative genetic test result will likely need additional support to encourage family communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Sato Ashida
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Lyons
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kaphingst KA, Blanchard M, Milam L, Pokharel M, Elrick A, Goodman MS. Relationships Between Health Literacy and Genomics-Related Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Importance, and Communication in a Medically Underserved Population. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21 Suppl 1:58-68. [PMID: 27043759 PMCID: PMC5546792 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1144661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The increasing importance of genomic information in clinical care heightens the need to examine how individuals understand, value, and communicate about this information. Based on a conceptual framework of genomics-related health literacy, we examined whether health literacy was related to knowledge, self-efficacy, and perceived importance of genetics and family health history (FHH) and communication about FHH in a medically underserved population. The analytic sample was composed of 624 patients at a primary care clinic in a large urban hospital. About half of the participants (47%) had limited health literacy; 55% had no education beyond high school, and 58% were Black. In multivariable models, limited health literacy was associated with lower genetic knowledge (β = -0.55, SE = 0.10, p < .0001), lower awareness of FHH (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.28, 0.90], p = .020), and greater perceived importance of genetic information (OR = 1.95, 95% CI [1.27, 3.00], p = .0022) but lower perceived importance of FHH information (OR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.26, 0.86], p = .013) and more frequent communication with a doctor about FHH (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.27, 3.23], p = .0032). The findings highlight the importance of considering domains of genomics-related health literacy (e.g., knowledge, oral literacy) in developing educational strategies for genomic information. Health literacy research is essential to avoid increasing disparities in information and health outcomes as genomic information reaches more patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- a Huntsman Cancer Institute , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
- b Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Melvin Blanchard
- c Department of Medicine , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , Missouri , USA
| | - Laurel Milam
- d Division of Public Health Sciences , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , Missouri , USA
| | - Manusheela Pokharel
- b Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Ashley Elrick
- b Department of Communication , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- d Division of Public Health Sciences , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , Missouri , USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhou CF, Ma T, Zhou DC, Shen T, Zhu QX. Association of glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism with the risk of skin cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol Res 2015; 307:505-13. [PMID: 26044055 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-015-1576-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Revised: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association of Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism with the risk of skin cancer. However, the results remain inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the association between the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and skin cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association of GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism with skin cancer risk. Thirteen case-control studies in nine articles, which included a total of 1504 cases and 2243 controls. Overall, we found that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism was not associated with skin cancer risk. Furthermore, subgroup analysis by histological types showed that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism was associated with risks of malignant melanoma under the dominant model (Val/Val + Val/Ile vs. Ile/Ile: OR 1.230, 95 % CI 1.017-1.488, P = 0.033). However, lack of association between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and BCC and SCC risk in all genetic models. Our meta-analysis suggested that the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism might be associated with increased risk of malignant melanoma in Caucasian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Fan Zhou
- Department of Occupational Health and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hovick SR, Kahlor L, Liang MC. Personal cancer knowledge and information seeking through PRISM: the planned risk information seeking model. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2014; 19:511-527. [PMID: 24433251 PMCID: PMC8582150 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.821556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
This study retested PRISM, a model of risk information seeking, and found that it is applicable to the context of cancer risk communication. The study, which used an online sample of 928 U.S. adults, also tested the effect of additional variables on that model and found that the original model better fit the data. Among the strongest predictors of cancer information seeking were seeking-related subjective norms, attitude toward seeking, perceived knowledge insufficiency, and affective risk response. Furthermore, risk perception was a strong predictor of an affective risk response. The authors suggest that, given the robustness across studies, the path between seeking-related subjective norms and seeking intention is ready to be implemented in communication practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelly R Hovick
- a School of Communication, The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Skirton H, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, O'Connor A. Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing? Per Med 2013; 10:673-682. [PMID: 29768754 DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic tests have been offered for over a decade. With the reduction in the cost of sequencing, the options for consumers will increase, with subsequent pressure on health services to interpret data and integrate the results into healthcare management. However, indications are that health professionals are grossly unprepared to deal with requests for support from those who have undertaken direct-to-consumer genetic or genomic tests. While benefits may be derived from patient-driven investigations, distinction needs to be made between the mostly uncertain clinical utility of susceptibility testing and the potential benefits of a reliably interpreted sequencing result. It is essential that we develop strategies, including enhanced professional education, to cope with the potential impact on the health services, rather than ignoring these developments. There may also be implications for the future of genetic counseling, with potential changes in the current paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Skirton
- Applied Health Genetics Research Group, Faculty of Health, Education & Society, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
| | - Leigh Jackson
- Applied Health Genetics Research Group, Faculty of Health, Education & Society, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Lesley Goldsmith
- Applied Health Genetics Research Group, Faculty of Health, Education & Society, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Anita O'Connor
- Applied Health Genetics Research Group, Faculty of Health, Education & Society, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|