Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with decompensated cirrhosis

The role of hepatic reserve in the mortality of cirrhotic patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma receiving radiofrequency ablation

Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a curative treatment for early stage small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the long-term prognosis is suboptimal. The major complications in cirrhotic patients are usually related to poor prognosis and include esophageal variceal bleeding, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. This study aimed to evaluate the role of liver reserve on mortality after RFA for early stage HCC among cirrhotic patients, according to the presence of the number of complications. The Taiwan National Health Insurance Database was used to identify 2389 cirrhotic patients with treatment-naïve HCC (<3 cm) undergoing RFA hospitalized between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013. Of these, 594 patients had concurrent or a history of cirrhotic-related complications. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates in the cirrhotic patients with complications were 78.5% and 39.8%, respectively, and those in the patients without complications were 92.7% and 65.9% (P < .001), respectively. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.04, P < .001) and cirrhotic-related complications (HR 2.65, 95% CI 2.22-3.16, P < .001) significantly increased 3-year mortality. The HR of mortality in patients with 1, 2, or 3 complications compared to those without complications were 2.35 (95% CI 1.92-2.88), 3.27 (95% CI 2.48-4.30), and 4.63 (95% CI 2.82-7.62), respectively (all P < .001). In cirrhotic patients with early stage HCC undergoing RFA, poor liver reserve correlates with poor outcome. The presence or history of three cirrhotic-related complications increased 3-year mortality 4-fold.

The importance of liver functional reserve in the non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The aim of any oncological treatment is not just to eliminate the tumour, but to maximise patient survival and quality of life. Since the liver has a vital function, any radical treatment that severely compromises liver function will result in a shortening of life expectancy, rather than a prolongation. Furthermore, even non-severe liver damage may prevent the delivery of further effective therapies. This is particularly important in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as it is associated with underlying cirrhosis in most patients - cirrhosis itself is not only a potentially lethal disease and independent prognostic factor in HCC, but it also makes liver function fragile. Accordingly, some information about liver dysfunction is included in most staging systems for HCC and can be used to guide the selection of treatments that the functional liver reserve can tolerate. Unfortunately, the prediction of functional damage to the liver in the case of antitumor treatments is very challenging and still suboptimal in any given patient. Moreover, while the assessment of functional reserve can now be used to avoid postoperative liver failure in the surgical setting, its use has been less well clarified for non-surgical therapies, which is of particular relevance today, as several lines of effective non-surgical treatments, including systemic therapies, have become available. The present article will a) critically review the implications of the assessment of liver functional reserve in patients with HCC, b) illustrate the available tools to assess liver functional reserve and c) discuss the role of functional assessment for each type of non-surgical therapy for HCC.

Treatment Options for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma have good prognosis and are treated with curative intent. Although this cohort of patients is generally defined by limited tumor burden, good liver function, and preserved functional status, there remains utility in further stratification to optimize overall survival and limit post-operative morbidity and mortality. Transplant, resection, ablation, transarterial radioembolization, and transarterial chemoembolization, either as monotherapy or in combination, may play a crucial role in treating this cohort of patients depending on a multitude of factors. In this section, we review each treatment modality and provide general guidelines for patient selection.

SN, Kulkarni S, Shetty NS, Gupta A, Gupta S. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Expert Consensus Statements for Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Part I

Locoregional therapies play an important role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Percutaneous ablation is one of the most commonly employed nonsurgical methods for treating very early and early HCC. For small HCCs, ablation is potentially curative and competes with surgical resection. The widespread availability and the spectrum of ablative techniques mandate uniform approach among interventional radiologists. Thus, it is desirable to have a consensus regarding various aspects of liver ablation. This article represents a consensus document of the experts from the Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology involved in the care of patients with HCC. The statements are presented in two parts.

Treatment Selection for Early to Intermediate Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Many guidelines and standard therapies have been published for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple options for the treatment of early to intermediate-stage HCC have resulted in several differences between the guidelines. In addition, more than a few non-standard therapies have been used in a real-world clinical setting. Radiofrequency ablation or chemotherapy, including hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and molecular target agents, are sometimes selected for the treatment of intermediate HCC, whereas in many guidelines, the recommended therapy for these patients is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. The present status of these topics is reviewed and summarized.

Prognostic value of enhancement rate by enhanced ultrasound in hepatitis B virus-positive hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation

AIM

To assess the prognostic significance of enhancement rate (ER) measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 253 patients with single primary HCC undergoing preoperative CEUS and RFA were enrolled in this study. The ER were evaluated though pretreatment CEUS. After a mean follow-up of 36.8 ± 10.2 months, the correlation of ER measured by CEUS and survival after RFA was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff ER value to predict survival was determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period for all 253 patients was 36.8 ± 10.2 months, 31.2% of patients had died at endpoint. The optimal cutoff ER value predicting survival was 2.2 dB/s. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with a high ER level had poorer OS (62.8 months vs 48.8 months, P = 0.02) and recurrence-free survival (RFS = 60.2 months vs 47.4 months, P = 0.03) than patients with a low ER level. ER measured by CEUS also been confirmed as independent risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.21-7.25; P < 0.01) and RFS (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-6.21; P < 0.01) in multivariate analysis enrolling gender, BMI, tumor size, antiviral therapy, HBV DNA, histological differentiation, Child-Pugh score and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage.

CONCLUSIONS

ER measured by CEUS was a significant predictive factor for survival after RFA for HCC.

Application of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a standard therapy for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we tried to elucidate the possibility of using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as an alternative treatment of intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

Among 246 patients who were initially diagnosed with intermediate-stage HCC, 76 who were treated with TACE (TACE group) and 91 who were treated with RFA (RFA group) were enrolled in this study. The risk for survival was analyzed with the Cox Proportional Hazard Model, and the survival rates were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

About half (50.6%) of the intermediate-stage HCC patients in the RFA group were diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer substage-B1 (BCLC-B1) compared with only 19.7% of the patients in the TACE group. Survival of the RFA group was longer than that of TACE group in patients with BCLC-B1 and BCLC-B2. In contrast, no difference between groups was observed in patients with BCLC-B3/4. Multivariate analysis revealed that large tumor size (>30 mm, hazard ratio = 1.685, P = 0.043), high des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (>100 mAU/mL, hazard ratio = 1.920, P = 0.012), and TACE group (hazard ratio = 1.896, P = 0.016) were significant risk factors for survival. Overall 3-year survival of the patients in the RFA group (69.5%) was significantly longer than that of patients in the TACE group (51.5%) after propensity score matching (P = 0.032). No significant adverse events were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA was useful for the treatment of less advanced intermediate-stage HCC and could be an alternative to TACE in selected cases.

Is there a survival benefit in interventional radiology for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis?: A multicenter study

AIM

A lack of donors in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a big issue. There is no consensus regarding whether interventional radiology for HCC in patients with Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis will improve prognosis. To elucidate the effectiveness of such treatment, we evaluated the clinical features of affected patients.

METHODS

Patients with naive HCC of Child-Pugh C (n = 236) were enrolled. Two of them were treated with LT after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were used as bridging treatments. After exclusion of a total of three patients who received LT, we evaluated clinical factors related to improved prognosis.

RESULTS

The percentage of all patients with total bilirubin of less than 3 mg/dL was 41.1%. The prognosis of patients who were received treatments (n = 30; ablative therapy 10, TACE 20) was better than non-treated patients (n = 18; mean survival time [MST] 22.2 vs 13.8 months, P = 0.021, respectively) in patients with up to 7 criteria and total bilirubin of less than 3 mg/dL (n = 48). On the other hand, there was no difference in prognosis between those who underwent ablative therapies (n = 10) and those who received TACE (n = 20) (MST 22.2 vs 16.9 months, P = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

Therapy for HCC may prolong survival in patients with naive HCC, with up to 7 criteria and total bilirubin of less than 3 mg/dL.

JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

The Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology was updated in June 2014 at a consensus meeting of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Three important items have been updated: the surveillance and diagnostic algorithm, the treatment algorithm, and the definition of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) failure/refractoriness. The most important update to the diagnostic algorithm is the inclusion of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a first line surveillance/diagnostic tool. Another significant update concerns removal of the term "lipiodol" from the definition of TACE failure/refractoriness.