1
|
Abdalla A, Cohn JA, Simhan J. Unraveling the Complexities of Uretero-Enteric Strictures: A Modern Review. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:287-297. [PMID: 39138815 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01222-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review article is to provide a contemporary overview of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture (UAS) management and outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS In this article, we will review the most recent studies investigating UAS and evaluate etiology, potential risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and management options, along with personal insight gained from our experience with managing this challenging reconstructive complication. Benign UAS is a relatively common long-term complication of intestinal urinary diversion, affecting approximately 1 in 10 patients. It is thought to be caused by ureteral tissue ischemia and fibrosis at the anastomotic site. Risk factors appear to include any that increase the likelihood of leak or ischemia; it is not clear if anastomotic approach impacts risk for stricture as well. Management options are varied and include endourologic, open, and robotic approaches. Endoscopic approaches may be less morbid but are considerably less effective than reconstruction performed after a period of ureteral rest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Abdalla
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19141, USA
| | - Joshua A Cohn
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - J Simhan
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mirto BF, Barone B, Balsamo R, Abate M, Caputo VF, Sciarra A, Calogero A, Romano L, Napolitano L, Sciorio C, Lucarelli G, Lasorsa F, Ferro M, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Manfredi C, Tătaru S, Pradere B, Imbimbo C, Crocetto F. Early and late post-procedural complications in different orthotopic neobladder surgical approaches: A systematic review. Surg Oncol 2024; 55:102090. [PMID: 38917777 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BCa) represents the second most common malignancy of the genitourinary tract. The major risk factors include age, gender, smoking attitude, and occupational exposure, while the exact etiopathogenesis is still uncertain. Patients diagnosed with a BCa showing invasion of the muscle layer below the submucosa must undergo radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion (UD). Many different surgical approaches to UD have been developed. Packaging an orthotopic neobladder (ON) with a bowel tract represents the gold standard when certain patient selection criteria are satisfied. Using PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review assessing early (within 90 days) and late (beyond 90 days) post-procedural complications of different ON surgical approaches. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify papers starting from 2012 using dedicated keywords ("neobladder", "orthotopic neobladder", "complications'' and "outcomes"). A total of 27 articles were found to satisfy the inclusion criteria and selected. Although the ON is a safe procedure that guarantees the patient the best quality of life (QoL), it is not free from risks. Many complications could occur during and after the surgical time which imposes the necessity of strict follow-up and careful checks over time, which should be properly discussed with patients before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benito Fabio Mirto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology Unit, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, Caserta, Via Ferdinando Palasciano, 81100, Caserta, Italy.
| | | | - Marco Abate
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Francesco Caputo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonella Sciarra
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, NA, Italy
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Romano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine Sciorio
- Urology Unit, Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, ASST, Lecco, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology & Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Emergency & Organ Transplantation - Urology, Andrology & Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO)-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122, Foggia, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and of General and Specialist Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80121, Naples, Italy
| | - Sabin Tătaru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1030, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31130, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Z, Zheng B, Hu Y, Li H, Qin X, Hu X, Wang S, Wang H, Zhang P, Wo Q, Sun L, Mou Y, Liu F, Cui J, Zhang D. The cause analysis of benign uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1070141. [PMID: 36582808 PMCID: PMC9792835 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1070141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Benign uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture (UIAS) is a major complication following radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution, and it can occur in combination with other complications. But risk factors for patients with UIAS have not been well described. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed 198 patients treated with RC for bladder cancer from 2014 to 2019 at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. Patient demographic and clinical variables were examined to determine the risk factors associated with UIAS by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 180 patients into the group standards and in all 360 uretero-ileal anastomoses. Among the above cases, 22 patients developed UIAS, including 10 cases of left UIAS, nine cases of right UIAS, and three cases of bilateral UIAS. There was no difference in demographic, operative, or perioperative variables between patients with and without UIAS. In a multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender, age, surgical methods, and underlying diseases, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion (HR = 0.144, P <0.01), postoperative urinary tract infection (HR = 3.624, P <0.01), and extracorporeal bladder anastomosis (HR = 3.395, P = 0.02) significantly increased the risk of UIAS. Conclusions In our experience, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative urinary tract infection, and extracorporeal neobladder anastomoses increased the risk of UIAS after radical cystectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution surgery. Further studies with larger samples are necessary to validate this result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenghong Liu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bin Zheng
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuqi Hu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haichang Li
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaowen Qin
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuanhan Hu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Heng Wang
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pu Zhang
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qijun Wo
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Sun
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yixuan Mou
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianxin Cui
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China,*Correspondence: Jianxin Cui, ; ; Dahong Zhang,
| | - Dahong Zhang
- Urology and Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Jianxin Cui, ; ; Dahong Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fasanella D, Marchioni M, Domanico L, Franzini C, Inferrera A, Schips L, Greco F. Neobladder "Function": Tips and Tricks for Surgery and Postoperative Management. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12081193. [PMID: 36013372 PMCID: PMC9409805 DOI: 10.3390/life12081193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Orthotopic neobladder (ONB) reconstruction is a continent urinary diversion procedure increasingly used in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer following radical cystectomy (RC). It represents a valid alternative to the ileal duct in suitable patients who do not prefer a stoma and are motivated to undergo adequate training of the neobladder. Careful patient selection, taking into account the absolute and relative contraindications for ONB as well as an adequate recovery protocol after surgery are integral to the success of this procedure and the oncological and functional outcomes. The objective of this review is to summarize the current data on RC with ONB in terms of patient selection, preoperative preparation, surgical techniques and functional (continence and sexual activity) and oncological outcomes, with particular attention to the management of complications and the impact on quality of life (QoL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Fasanella
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Luigi Domanico
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia Franzini
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonino Inferrera
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Urology Unit, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti, SS Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesco Greco
- Urology Unit, Centro Salute Uomo, Via Palma il Vecchio 4a, 24122 Bergamo, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3317918535
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee CU, Lee JH, Lee DH, Song W. Feasibility and Safety of Stentless Uretero-Intestinal Anastomosis in Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Orthotopic Neobladder. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225372. [PMID: 34830652 PMCID: PMC8624446 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the feasibility and safety of stentless uretero-intestinal anastomosis (UIA) during radical cystectomy (RC) with an ileal orthotopic neobladder. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 403 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer between August 2014 and December 2018. The primary objective was to study the effect of stentless UIA on uretero-intestinal anastomosis stricture (UIAS), and the secondary objective was to evaluate the association between stentless UIA and other complications, including paralytic ileus, febrile urinary tract infection (UTI), and urine leakage. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate UIAS-free survival, and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to identify factors associated with the risk of UIAS. Results: Among 403 patients with 790 renal units, UIAS was identified in 39 (9.7%) patients and 53 (6.7%) renal units. Forty-four (83.0%) patients with UIAS were diagnosed within 6 months. The 1- and 2-year overall UIAS-free rates were 93.9% and 92.7%, respectively. Paralytic ileus was identified in 105 (26.1%) patients and resolved with supportive treatment. Febrile UTI occurred in 57 patients (14.1%). However, there was no leak of the UIA. Conclusions: Stentless UIA during RC with an ileal orthotopic neobladder is a feasible and safe surgical option. Further prospective randomized trials are required to determine the clinical usefulness of stentless UIA during RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (J.H.L.)
| | - Jong Hoon Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (J.H.L.)
| | - Dong Hyeon Lee
- Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul 07985, Korea;
| | - Wan Song
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea; (C.U.L.); (J.H.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-3410-3559
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peng YL, Ning K, Wu ZS, Li ZY, Deng MH, Xiong LB, Yu CP, Zhang ZL, Liu ZW, Lu HM, Zhou FJ. Ureteral stents cannot decrease the incidence of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture and leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2021; 93:106058. [PMID: 34416355 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ileal conduit and ileal orthotopic neobladder were the most popular methods for urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Stenting the anastomosis of ileo-ureter or ureter-neobladder was a common practice. However, it is still controversial if ureteral stents could prevent complications such as ureteroileal anastomosis stricture (UIAS) and ureteroileal anastomosis leakage (UIAL) after ureteral anastomosis. OBJECTIVES This study aims to investigate the role of the ureteral stent in preventing UIAS and UIAL. DATA SOURCES We systematically searched the related studies in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Cohort studies that identified the use of stent and the incidence of UIAS or UIAL were recorded. DATA SYNTHESIS Comparative meta-analysis was conducted on four cohort studies for comparison of UIAS and UIAL between the stented and nonstented groups. Besides, eleven studies which reported the events of UIAS and UIAL were used for meta-analysis of single proportion. RESULTS A total of 11 studies were qualified for analysis. Comparative meta-analysis identified that the incidence of UIAS was higher in the stented group than that in the nonstented group, but this did not reach a significant difference (odds ratio [OR]: 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-3.05; P = 0.12). Besides, there was no difference in the incidences of UIAL between the stented and the nonstented groups. On meta-analysis of single proportion, the incidence of UIAS was 7% (95% CI: 3%-10%) in the stented group and 3% (95% CI: 1%-6%) in the nonstented group. The UIAL rate was 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) in stented patients and 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%) in nonstented patients. CONCLUSION Stenting the ureteroileal anastomosis resulted in a higher incidence of UIAS. There is no evidence to support ureteral stents could prevent the occurrence of UIAL after urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Lu Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Kang Ning
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ze-Shen Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhi-Yong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Min-Hua Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Long-Bin Xiong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Chun-Ping Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhi-Ling Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhuo-Wei Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Hui-Ming Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.
| | - Fang-Jian Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tafuri A, Presicce F, Sebben M, Cattaneo F, Rizzetto R, Ferrara F, Bondurri A, Veltri M, Barbierato M, Pata F, Forni C, Roveron G, Rizzo G, Parini D. Surgical management of urinary diversion and stomas in adults: multidisciplinary Italian panel guidelines. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 74:265-280. [PMID: 34114787 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04379-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary stomas represent a worldwide medical and social problem. Data from literature about stoma management are extensive, but inhomogeneous. No guidelines exist about this topic. So, clear and comprehensive clinical guidelines based on evidence-based data and best practice are needed. This article aims to elaborate guidelines for practice management of urinary stomas in adults. METHODS Experts guided review of the literature was performed in PubMed, National Guideline Clearing-house and other databases (updated March 31, 2018). The research included guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized clinical trials, cohort studies and case reports. Five main topics were identified: "stoma preparation", "stoma creation", "stoma complications", "stoma care" and "stoma reversal". The systematic review was performed for each topic and studies were evaluated according to the GRADE system, AGREE II tool. Recommendations were elaborated in the form of statements with an established grade of recommendation for each statement. For low level of scientific evidence statements a consensus conference composed by expert members of the major Italian scientific societies in the field of stoma management and care was performed. RESULTS After discussing, correcting, validating, or eliminating the statements by the experts, the final version of the guidelines with definitive recommendations was elaborated and prepared for publication. This manuscript is focused on statements about surgical management of urinary stomas. These guidelines include recommendations for adult patients only, articles published in English or Italian and with complete text available. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines represent the first Italian guidelines about urinary stoma multidisciplinary management with the aim to assist urologists and stoma specialized nurses during the urinary stoma management and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy - .,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy -
| | | | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria IRCCS, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Cattaneo
- Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ferrara
- Department of Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Bondurri
- Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Veltri
- General Surgery Unit, San Jacopo Hospital, Pistoia, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Pata
- General Surgery Unit, N. Giannettasio Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristiana Forni
- Nursing and Allied Profession Research Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Roveron
- Ostomy and Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Centre, S. Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rizzo
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Parini
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kobayashi K, Goel A, Coelho MP, Medina Perez M, Klumpp M, Tewari SO, Appleton-Figueira T, Pinter DJ, Shapiro O, Jawed M. Complications of Ileal Conduits after Radical Cystectomy: Interventional Radiologic Management. Radiographics 2020; 41:249-267. [PMID: 33306453 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Since their introduction into clinical practice in the 1950s, ileal conduits have been the most common type of urinary diversion used after radical cystectomy worldwide. Although ileal conduits are technically simpler to construct than other forms of urinary diversion, a variety of complications can occur in the early and late postoperative periods. Early complications include urine leakage, urinary obstruction, postoperative fluid collection (eg, urinoma, hematoma, lymphocele, or abscess), and fistula formation. Late complications include ureteroileal anastomotic stricture, stomal stenosis, conduit stenosis, and urolithiasis. Although not directly related to ileal conduits, ureteroarterial fistula can occur in patients with an ileal conduit. Interventional radiologists can play a pivotal role in diagnosis and management of these complications by performing image-guided minimally invasive procedures. In this article, the authors review the surgical anatomy of an ileal conduit and the underlying pathophysiology of and diagnostic workup for complications related to ileal conduits. The authors also discuss and illustrate current approaches to interventional radiologic management of these complications, with emphasis on a collaborative approach with urologists or endourologists to best preserve patients' renal function and maintain their quality of life. ©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiro Kobayashi
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Atin Goel
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Marlon P Coelho
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Mariangeles Medina Perez
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Matthew Klumpp
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Sanjit O Tewari
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Tomas Appleton-Figueira
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - David J Pinter
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Oleg Shapiro
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| | - Mohammed Jawed
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.K., A.G., M.P.C., M.M.P., M.K., S.O.T., T.A.F., D.J.P., M.J.), and Urology (O.S.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Predictors of Benign Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures After Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion. Urology 2020; 144:225-229. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Pfister D, Niegisch G. [Bladder cancer - complications related to urinary diversion]. Aktuelle Urol 2020; 51:456-462. [PMID: 32462641 DOI: 10.1055/a-1134-6642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Even today, radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is one of the most complicated procedures in uro-oncology. Particularly in the long-term course, but also perioperatively, problems caused by urinary diversion play a significant role.Perioperatively, gastrointestinal problems such as an ileus, but also infections and early complications of the different anastomoses are most important. While ileus and perioperative infections can usually be treated conservatively, failure of the intestinal or ureteroileal anastomoses require regular surgical revisions.In the long-term follow-up, scarring can lead to chronic obstruction of urinary flow and, in the case of continental urinary diversions, to stone formation. These complications, as well as parastomal hernias in patients with poor conduits, may require further therapy. Functional bowel disorders may impair patients' quality of life significantly.Improved preoperative preparation and accompanying measures during the inpatient stay can significantly reduce non-surgical complications.Cystectomy with therapy-associated morbidity is a classical example of when surgery must be performed at specialised centers to reduce complications perioperatively as well as in follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pfister
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, Roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie Universitätsklinik Köln
| | - Günter Niegisch
- Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Medizinische Fakultät, Klinik für Urologie, Düsseldorf
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Intraoperative Ureteral Stent Use at Radical Cystectomy is Associated with Higher 30-Day Complication Rates. J Urol 2020; 205:483-490. [PMID: 33238829 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical cystectomy/urinary diversion is a high risk procedure. Intraoperative stents are commonly utilized to decrease ureteroenteric anastomosis related complications. Institutionally some surgeons routinely use intraoperative stents while others do not, providing an opportunity to compare complication differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS We queried a prospective database of 283 patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial evaluating 30-day perioperative complications with goal directed fluid therapy following open radical cystectomy/urinary diversion between 2014 and 2018. Ureteroenteric anastomosis specific complications (ureteral obstruction, urinary leak, urinary infections/sepsis and intra-abdominal abscess) were compared between groups (intraoperative stent vs nonintraoperative stent group) using Fisher exact test and quantified using logistic regression. RESULTS The nonintraoperative stent group (77 of 283 patients, 27%) was older (median 72 vs 69 years) and was more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (53% vs 40%), have baseline renal insufficiency (43% vs 30%) and undergo an ileal conduit (92% vs 53%). However, despite higher comorbidity, the nonintraoperative stent group had a significantly lower rate of ureteroenteric anastomosis complications (14% vs 32%, p=0.004). Since continent diversions may be associated with higher complications, the nonintraoperative stent group with ileal conduit was also compared to intraoperative stent cohorts with ileal conduit, and ureteroenteric anastomosis complications remained lower in the nonintraoperative stent group (14% vs 28%, p=0.043). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly increased odds of urinary complications with intraoperative stent use (OR 3.55, 95% CI 2.93-4.31; p <0.0001). Importantly there was no obstruction and only 1 leak (1.3%) in the nonintraoperative stent group. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to conventional belief, we found intraoperative stent use in radical cystectomy/urinary diversion was associated with significantly higher infectious complications and urgent care visits, and significantly increased the odds of 30-day ureteroenteric anastomosis associated complications.
Collapse
|
12
|
Oh JJ, Lee S, Ku JH, Kwon TG, Kim TH, Jeon SH, Lee SH, Nam JK, Kim WS, Jeong BC, Lee JY, Hong SH, Rha KH, Han WK, Ham WS, Lee YG, Lee YS, Park SY, Yoon YE, Kang SG, Kang SH. Oncological outcome according to attainment of pentafecta after robot-assisted radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer included in the multicentre KORARC database. BJU Int 2020; 127:182-189. [PMID: 32682331 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the oncological significance of a robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC)-related pentafecta in patients with bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the KORARC database, which includes data from 12 centres, data from 730 patients who underwent RARC between April 2007 and May 2019 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Pentafecta was achieved if patients met all of the following criteria: (i) negative soft tissue surgical margin; (ii) ≥16 lymph nodes removed; (iii) no major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5) within 90 days; (iv) no clinical recurrence within the first 12 months; and (v) no ureteroenteric stricture. Patients were divided into two groups according to pentafecta attainment, and a comparison of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using multivariate Cox proportional analysis was then carried out. RESULTS Of the 730 patients included in this analysis, 208 (28.5%) attained the RARC pentafecta; the remaining 522 (71.5%) did not. The mean age of the patients was 64.67 years, 85.1% were men, 53.6% received a conduit, 37.7% received orthotopic neobladders and the total complication rate was 57.8%. Those who attained the pentafecta received more neobladders (P = 0.039), were more likely to be treated with the intracorporeal technique (P < 0.001), had longer operating times (P = 0.020) and had longer console time (P = 0.021) compared with those who did not attain the pentafecta. Over a mean of 31.1 months of follow-up, the pentafecta attainment group had significantly higher OS and CSS rates compared with the non-attainment group (10-year OS 70.4% vs 58.1%, respectively [P = 0.016]; 10-year CSS 87.8% vs 70.0%, respectively [P = 0.036]). Multivariate analysis showed that the RARC pentafecta was a significant predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio 0.561; P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS Patients who attained the RARC pentafecta had significantly better survival outcomes compared with those who did not. These criteria could be used to standardize assessment of the surgical quality of RARC. In the future, a similar study using an independent cohort is warranted to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Jin Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangchul Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Gyun Kwon
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Tae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seung Hyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyup Lee
- Department of Urology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Kil Nam
- Department of Urology, Busan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Wan Seok Kim
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Youl Lee
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Koon Ho Rha
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Kyu Han
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Sik Ham
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Goo Lee
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Seong Lee
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Sung Yul Park
- Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Eun Yoon
- Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Gu Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Ho Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laporte GA, Zanini LAG, Zanvettor PH, Oliveira AF, Bernado E, Lissa F, Coelho MJP, Ribeiro R, Araujo RLC, Barrozo AJJ, da Costa AF, de Barros Júnior AP, Lopes A, Santos APM, Azevedo BRB, Sarmento BJQ, Marins CAM, Loureiro CMB, Galhardo CAV, Gatelli CN, Quadros CA, Pinto CV, Uchôa DNAO, Martins DRS, Doria-Filho E, Ribeiro EKMA, Pinto ERF, Dos Santos EAS, Gozi FAM, Nascimento FC, Fernandes FG, Gomes FKL, Nascimento GJS, Cucolicchio GO, Ritt GF, de Oliveira GG, Ayala GP, Guimarães GC, Ianaze GC, Gobetti GA, Medeiros GM, Güth GZ, Neto HFC, Figueiredo HF, Simões JC, Ferrari JC, Furtado JPR, Vieira LJ, Pereira LF, de Almeida LCF, Tayeh MRA, Figueiredo PHM, Pereira RSAV, Macedo RO, Sacramento RMM, Cardoso RM, Zanatto RM, Martinho RAM, Araújo RG, Pinheiro RN, Reis RJ, Goiânia SBS, Costa SRP, Foiato TF, Silva TC, Carneiro VCG, Oliveira VR, Casteleins WA. Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Oncologic Surgery for pelvic exenteration in the treatment of cervical cancer. J Surg Oncol 2019; 121:718-729. [PMID: 31777095 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The primary treatment for locally advanced cases of cervical cancer is chemoradiation followed by high-dose brachytherapy. When this treatment fails, pelvic exenteration (PE) is an option in some cases. This study aimed to develop recommendations for the best management of patients with cervical cancer undergoing salvage PE. METHODS A questionnaire was administered to all members of the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology. Of them, 68 surgeons participated in the study and were divided into 10 working groups. A literature review of studies retrieved from the National Library of Medicine database was carried out on topics chosen by the participants. These topics were indications for curative and palliative PE, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of tumor resectability, access routes and surgical techniques, PE classification, urinary, vaginal, intestinal, and pelvic floor reconstructions, and postoperative follow-up. To define the level of evidence and strength of each recommendation, an adapted version of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Health Service rating system was used. RESULTS Most conducts and management strategies reviewed were strongly recommended by the participants. CONCLUSIONS Guidelines outlining strategies for PE in the treatment of persistent or relapsed cervical cancer were developed and are based on the best evidence available in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Enio Bernado
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fernando Lissa
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Andre Lopes
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cláudio V Pinto
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Eric R F Pinto
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gunther P Ayala
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Gustavo Z Güth
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - João C Simões
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - José C Ferrari
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Lucas F Pereira
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Ramon O Macedo
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rosilene J Reis
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Tyrone C Silva
- Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Population-based Study of Ureteroenteric Strictures After Open and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy. Urology 2019; 135:57-65. [PMID: 31618656 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate differences in the incidence of benign ureteroenteric stricture, we compared stricture rates of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. METHODS We identified 332 RARC and 1449 ORC performed between 2009 and 2014 to determine stricture rates at 6, 12, and 24 months following surgery. We defined ureteroenteric stricture as the need for procedural intervention. Additionally, we compared the incidence of stricture diagnosis. Multivariable proportional hazards regression was performed to determine factors associated with stricture development. RESULTS The incidence of ureteroenteric stricture at 6 and 12 months was higher for RARC vs ORC at 12.1% vs 7.0% (P < .01) and 15.0% vs 9.5% (P = .01), respectively. RARC vs ORC stricture incidence at 2 years did not differ significantly at 14.6% vs 11.4% (P = .29). Similarly, the stricture diagnosis rates were significantly lower following ORC at 6, 12, and 24 months (P < .05). In adjusted analysis, RARC (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.23-2.19) and preoperative hydronephrosis (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.17-1.94) were associated with the development of stricture. Higher hospital volume was associated with a lower risk of stricture (HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.26-0.63). CONCLUSION RARC is associated with a higher rate of ureteroenteric stricture diagnosis and intervention on a population-based level that is mitigated by higher hospital volume. A significant study limitation is inability to differentiate extracorporeal vs intracorporeal diversion. However, a stricture complication compounds the financial burden of care and efforts must be pursued to improve this surgical outcome.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Mochizuki T, Kawahara T, Iwamoto G, Kuroda S, Yao M, Uemura H. The Use of a Metal Stent in the Treatment of Ureteral Stricture in a Patient Who Had Undergone Radical Cystectomy with the Creation of an Ileal Conduit. Case Rep Oncol 2018; 11:159-163. [PMID: 29681815 PMCID: PMC5903133 DOI: 10.1159/000487588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately 9.2% of patients who undergo radical cystectomy are reported to develop ureteral stricture as a result of both benign and malignant conditions. A metallic stent is a continuous, unfenestrated all-metal double-pigtail ureteric stent with no end or side holes. The patient was a 74-year-old man who underwent radial cystectomy with the creation of an ileal conduit due to advanced bladder cancer 7 years previously. Although he had no radiographic recurrence, he developed bilateral hydronephrosis. We herein report the first case of a patient with ureteral stricture after radial cystectomy with the creation of an ileal conduit who was successfully treated by the insertion of a metal stent by a combined antegrade and retrograde approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Mochizuki
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawahara
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Genta Iwamoto
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shinnosuke Kuroda
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yao
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.,Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Urinary diversion (UD) with an intestinal segment has significant risks of short- and long-term complications. With modern reporting criteria, understanding of the true prevalence and spectrum of these complications has improved. Methods to minimize early postoperative complications include enhanced recovery pathways, restricted intraoperative fluid protocols, and referral to high-volume centers. With long-term follow-up after UD, the risk of complications steadily rises. Late surgical complications include ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures, urolithiasis, and stomal issues. Patients with UDs require close surveillance to monitor for anatomic, infectious, and metabolic complications and surgeons who perform UD should be aware of the risk and timing of postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
18
|
Tan WP, Whelan P, Deane LA. Intentional Omission of Ureteral Stents During Robotic-assisted Intracorporeal Ureteroenteric Anastomosis: Is It Safe and Feasible? Urology 2017; 102:116-120. [PMID: 28111222 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the surgical technique we used to perform a stentless intracorporeal ureteroenteric anastomosis and to determine the outcomes in this initial series. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients undergoing robotic-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion with stentless ureteroenteric anastomosis between March 2014 and July 2016. Diversions were performed at the time of either robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy for bladder cancer or urinary diversion for other indications. RESULTS A total of 10 patients underwent implantation of 20 ureters into the intestine via a robotic-assisted approach with intentional omission of stents. Median body mass index was 29.57 (first quartile 23.68, third quartile 34.69). Median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 (range 2-3). Seven patients had intracorporeal ileal conduit reconstruction and 3 patients had an intracorporeal neobladder creation. There were no patients who developed a stricture of the ureter nor did any patient develop a leak at the ureteroenteric anastomosis. All patients had normal serum creatinine at least 4 weeks after surgery, and all patients had follow-up computed tomography of the kidneys, which were normal. The median follow-up was 8 months (first quartile = 3 months, third quartile = 17 months). CONCLUSION Robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion with intentional omission of ureteral stents is a safe and feasible option when establishing continuity of the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Phin Tan
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
| | - Patrick Whelan
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Leslie A Deane
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kingo PS, Rasmussen TM, Nørregaard R, Borre M, Høyer S, Jensen JB. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open cystectomy and effect of carbon dioxide-pneumoperitoneum on histopathological findings in ureteroenteric anastomoses: results from an experimental randomized porcine study. Scand J Urol 2016; 51:50-56. [PMID: 27809635 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1247294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the histopathology of ureteroenteric anastomoses (UEAs) after radical cystectomy (RC) with an ileal conduit in a porcine model using different surgical techniques. The study also evaluated the potential anti-inflammatory effect of preoperative carbon dioxide-pneumoperitoneum (CO2P). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty female Danish Landrace pigs were randomized to four groups: three intervention groups [open surgery ± prior CO2P and robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy (RALC)], all subjected to RC and an ileal conduit, and one control group. After euthanization, UEAs were harvested and histopathologically evaluated. RESULTS Five pigs were excluded from the study owing to postoperative complications. Operating room time and clamping of the right and left ureters were significantly longer in the robotic than in the open groups (p < .01). Inflammatory infiltration grade of the left ureter was significantly higher in RALC (p = .032). No statistically significant difference was observed between the open groups receiving prior CO2P or not. CONCLUSIONS Results showed a statistically significant higher inflammatory infiltration grade of the left ureter in RALC, emphasizing the importance of using meticulous techniques when mobilizing the left ureter using the robot. It was not possible to conclude with certainty whether CO2P could constitute an anti-inflammatory agent for local inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Skjold Kingo
- a Department of Urology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.,b Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | | - Rikke Nørregaard
- b Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- a Department of Urology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark.,b Department of Clinical Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Søren Høyer
- c Department of Pathology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Baten E, Akand M, Floyd MS, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Albersen M, Everaerts W, Van Poppel H, Van Der Aa F, Joniau S. Evaluation of conservative approach in the management of ureteroenteric strictures following radical cystectomy with Bricker ileal conduit: a single-center experience. Scand J Urol 2016; 50:439-444. [PMID: 27686879 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1232307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and treatment options for ureteroenteric strictures (UES) following radical cystectomy (RC) and ileal conduit (IC) formation, and specifically to comment on the conservative management of UES in asymptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS The datasheets were reviewed of 304 consecutive patients who were treated with an RC and IC between January 2001 and May 2011 in a Belgian tertiary center and who followed a strict follow-up protocol. Long-term treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (7.2%) were diagnosed with UES (affecting 27 ureters in total), when a new-onset hydroureteronephrosis or increase of the pre-existing hydroureteronephrosis was detected by ultrasound or computed tomography. A retrograde loopogram was then performed to confirm the UES. The mean follow-up time was 33 months. A decline in renal function, the presence of flank pain and urinary tract infections were indications for interventional treatment. Six patients underwent double-J stent placement, two patients received percutaneous nephrostomies as a definitive treatment and two patients underwent ureterointestinal reimplantation. Asymptomatic patients with a UES and a favorable renal function were conservatively managed. They remained asymptomatic during follow-up and required no active treatment. CONCLUSIONS No clinical variable was independently associated with an increased risk of UES. These long-term data suggest that a selected patient population of asymptomatic patients with good renal function at the time of UES diagnosis can be safely managed conservatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evert Baten
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Murat Akand
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.,b Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Selcuk University , Konya , Turkey
| | - Michael S Floyd
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Maarten Albersen
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Hendrik Van Poppel
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Frank Van Der Aa
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- a Department of Urology, School of Medicine , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven , Leuven , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion is the gold-standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of urinary diversion and is associated with serious sequelae that lead to total or partial loss of kidney function, infectious complications, and the need for additional procedures. Although the exact aetiology of benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures is unclear, they most likely occur secondary to ischaemia at the anastomotic region. Diagnosis can be achieved using retrograde contrast studies, CT scan or MAG3 renography. Open revision remains the gold-standard treatment for ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures; however, endourological techniques are being increasingly used and, in select patients, might be the optimal approach.
Collapse
|
22
|
Richards KA, Cohn JA, Large MC, Bales GT, Smith ND, Steinberg GD. The effect of length of ureteral resection on benign ureterointestinal stricture rate in ileal conduit or ileal neobladder urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2014; 33:65.e1-8. [PMID: 25023788 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of the length of the ureter resected and other clinical variables on ureterointestinal anastomotic (UIA) stricture rate following radical cystectomy and ileal segment urinary diversion. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 519 consecutive patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit or ileal orthotopic neobladder diversion from January 2007 to August 2012. The length of the ureter resected was defined as the length of the ureter in the cystectomy specimen plus the length of the distal ureter submitted for pathologic analysis. The primary end point was the risk of UIA stricture formation, assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS A total of 463 patients met the inclusion criteria with complete data. Median follow-up was 459 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 211-927). Median time to stricture formation was 235 (IQR: 134-352) and 232 days (IQR: 132-351) on the right and the left ureter, respectively. Overall stricture rate per ureter was 5.9% on the right vs. 10.0% on the left (P = 0.03). There was no difference in demographic, operative, or perioperative variables between patients with and without UIA strictures. On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, anastomosis technique (running vs. interrupted), and length of ureter resected, only a Clavien complication≥III (hazard ratio = 2.11, 1.01-4.40) and urine leak (hazard ratio = 3.37, 1.08-10.46) significantly predicted for left- and right-sided stricture formation, respectively. The length of the ureter resected did not predict UIA stricture formation on either side. CONCLUSIONS The etiology of benign UIA strictures following ileal urinary diversion is likely multifactorial. Our data suggest that a complicated postoperative course and urine leak are risk factors for UIA stricture formation. The length of the distal ureter resected did not significantly affect stricture rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle A Richards
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
| | - Joshua A Cohn
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael C Large
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Urology of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gregory T Bales
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Norm D Smith
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The Impact of Running versus Interrupted Anastomosis on Ureterointestinal Stricture Rate after Radical Cystectomy. J Urol 2013; 190:923-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
24
|
|
25
|
Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Froehner M, Zastrow S, Leike S, Koch R, Wirth MP. Systematic assessment of complications and outcome of radical cystectomy undertaken with curative intent in patients with comorbidity and over 75 years of age. Urol Int 2013; 90:195-201. [PMID: 23363612 DOI: 10.1159/000345790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the complications, survival and oncological outcome of patients ≥75 years of age after radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between April 1993 and August 2010, 765 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy at one high-volume center. Of these, 70 patients were ≥75 years of age. All 70 patients had at least one severe systemic comorbidity with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3. Primary endpoints of this retrospective study were overall and recurrence-free survival with a mean follow-up of 22 months (1-159). Perioperative parameters such as need for blood transfusions, hospital stay, mortality, short- and long-term complications were also assessed. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Perioperative complications occurred in 23/70 patients (33%) with a 30-day mortality rate of 1.4%. 16/70 patients (23%) developed late complications requiring hospitalization. Within 30 days of surgery, according to the Clavien-Dindo grading, 27% had no complications, 3% grade 1, 49% grade 2, 14% grade 3, 6% grade 4 and 1.4% grade 5 complications. Within 31-90 days after surgery, 76% had grade 1 complications, 3% grade 2, 6% grade 3, 9% grade 4 and 6% grade 4 complications. The calculated 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 30 and 25%, respectively, with a recurrence-free survival rate of 52% at 5 and 42% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS Radical cystectomy is an appropriate and effective treatment for comorbid elderly patients. The oncological long-term outcome is the same as in younger patients while overall survival is comparatively lower. Mortality and complication-related morbidity are comparable to those in younger patients with modern perioperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Novotny
- Department of Urology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany. vladimir.novotny @ uniklinikum-dresden.de
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Weingärtner K. [Uretero-intestinal anastomosis: Achilles heel of urinary diversion using bowel segments]. Urologe A 2012; 51:956-64. [PMID: 22772494 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2909-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
A well-functioning uretero-intestinal anastomosis is essential for the preservation of kidney function following urinary diversion using bowel segments. In incontinent forms of urinary diversions, such as ileal conduits, the ureters are usually implanted in a refluxive manner, whereas there is still controversy about the ideal implantation technique in continent orthotopic or heterotopic reservoirs (i.e. refluxive versus anti-refluxive). Current techniques of refluxive and antirefluxive uretero-intestinal anastomosis, their indications, typical perioperative and postoperative complications and management are discussed. Irradiated or preoperatively dilated ureters show a higher complication rate in terms of postoperative dilatation and obstruction. Early revision of the implantation site and ureteral reimplantation yield more favorable outcomes and long-term results than a minor invasive endourological treatment. As ureteral stenosis may occur more than 15 years after urinary diversion, regular follow-up including sonographic evaluation of the upper urinary tract to detect hydronephrosis is mandatory. In this setting a diuretic renogram with MAG-III is a helpful tool to determine split renal function and to discriminate urodynamic relevant dilatation of the upper urinary tract from clinical situations requiring only observation, while dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scans provide valuable information about renal scarring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Weingärtner
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Klinikum Bamberg, Buger Straße 80, 96049 Bamberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|