Absolute blood volume in hemodialysis patients: why is it relevant, and how to measure it?

Haematocrit monitoring and blood volume estimation during continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Continuous haemoglobin, venous blood oxygen saturation, and haematocrit (Hct) monitoring is currently not applied during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Such Hct monitoring enables estimation of changes in blood volume as percentage change (ΔBV%) from therapy start time and is incorporated into intermittent haemodialysis machines but not CRRT machines despite its potential to optimise fluid management in CRRT patients.

METHODS

To overcome this problem, we used a standalone monitor (CRIT-LINE®IV, Fresenius Medical Care, Concord, USA) with an associated in-line blood chamber (CRIT-LINE®IV Blood Chamber, Fresenius Medical Care, Concord, USA) and designed our own adaptor connection piece (TekMed and Morriset, Melbourne and Brisbane, Australia) to allow these readings at the vascular access outflow and recorded data for estimated Hct and derived ΔBV% during CRRT.

RESULTS

We report on this technique with an illustrative case example and 12 h of CRRT data on the fluid loss rate prescribed, hourly net patient fluid loss (range: 0-308 mL/h), mean arterial pressure, norepinephrine dose (range: 5-14 mcg/min), estimated continuous Hct and ΔBV%, and the otherwise undetected diagnosis of an approximate 15 % decrease in blood volume during the CRRT.

CONCLUSION

We have described a technical CRRT circuit modification that can facilitate a previously unavailable assessment of fluid shifts during CRRT. Further application in clinical trials is now possible.

Effect of absolute blood volume measurement-guided fluid management on the incidence of intradialytic hypotension-associated events: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Ultrafiltration to target weight during haemodialysis is complicated by intradialytic hypotension-associated adverse events (IHAAEs) in 10-30% of dialysis treatments. IHAAEs are caused by critical reductions in absolute blood volume (ABV), due to the interaction of ultrafiltration, refill and compensatory mechanisms. Non-randomised studies have suggested that ABV-guided treatment, using an indicator dilution technique employing the blood volume monitor on the dialysis machine, could reduce the incidence of IHAAEs.

Methods

We performed an open-label randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to adjustment of target weight guided by ABV measurements or standard care. The primary outcome was the change in the incidence of IHAAEs from baseline, defined as the percentage of treatment episodes in a 4-week period where the patient had a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or symptoms of impending hypotension. ABV measurements were compared with anthropomorphometric estimation and the gold standard using isotope dilution.

Results

A total of 56 patients were randomised, of whom 29 were allocated to ABV-guided treatment and 27 to standard care. Overall baseline incidence of IHAAEs was 26.0%. ABV-guided treatment significantly reduced the incidence of IHAAEs compared with standard care, with a mean change from baseline of -9.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) -17.3 to -1.8) versus 2.4% (95% CI -2.3-7.2). The adjusted difference between the groups was 10.5% (95% CI 1.3-19.8; P = .026). ABV measurement had moderate agreement with other methods to estimate blood volume. The sensitivity for the previously suggested threshold of a post-dialysis normalised blood volume of 65 ml/kg was observed to be 74% in this study.

Conclusions

ABV-guided volume management significantly reduced IHAAEs compared with standard care. The clinical relevance of the previously suggested threshold of 65 ml/kg cannot be firmly concluded on the basis of our results. If confirmed in a larger trial, this intervention could potentially change dialysis practice and impact patient care in a clinically meaningful way.

Determinants and reference values for blood volume and total hemoglobin mass in women and men

Blood volume (BV) is an important clinical parameter and is usually reported per kg of body mass (BM). When fat mass is elevated, this underestimates BV/BM. One aim was to study if differences in BV/BM related to sex, age, and fitness would decrease if normalized to lean body mass (LBM). The analysis included 263 women and 319 men (age: 10-93 years, body mass index: 14-41 kg/m2 ) and 107 athletes who underwent assessment of BV and hemoglobin mass (Hbmass ), body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness. BV/BM was 25% lower (70.3 ± 11.3 and 80.3 ± 10.8 mL/kgBM ) in women than men, respectively, whereas BV/LBM was 6% higher in women (110.9 ± 12.5 and 105.3 ± 11.2 mL/kgLBM ). Hbmass /BM was 34% lower (8.9 ± 1.4 and 11.5 ± 11.2 g/kgBM ) in women than in men, respectively, but only 6% lower (14.0 ± 1.5 and 14.9 ± 1.5 g/kgLBM )/LBM. Age did not affect BV. Athlete's BV/BM was 17.2% higher than non-athletes, but decreased to only 2.5% when normalized to LBM. Of the variables analyzed, LBM was the strongest predictor for BV (R2  = .72, p < .001) and Hbmass (R2  = .81, p < .001). These data may only be valid for BV/Hbmass when assessed by CO re-breathing. Hbmass /LBM could be considered a valuable clinical matrix in medical care aiming to normalize blood homeostasis.

Intravascular volumes and the influence on anemia assessed by a carbon monoxide rebreathing method in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Fluid overload is a major challenge in hemodialysis patients and might cause hypervolemia. We speculated that hemodialysis patients reaching dry weight could have undetected hypervolemia and low hemoglobin (Hb) concentration (g/dL) due to hemodilution.

METHODS

The study included hemodialysis patients (n = 22) and matched healthy controls (n = 22). Blood volume, plasma volume, red blood cell volume, and total Hb mass were determined using a carbon monoxide (CO)-rebreathing method in hemodialysis patients reaching dry weight and controls. Blood volume measurements were also obtained by a dual-isotope labeling technique in a subgroup for validation purposes.

FINDINGS

In the hemodialysis group, the median specific blood volume was 89.3 mL/kg (interquartile range [IQR]: 76.7-95.4 mL/kg) and was higher than in the control group (79.9 mL/kg [IQR: 70.4-88.0 mL/kg]; p < 0.037). The median specific plasma volume was 54.7 mL/kg (IQR: 47.1-61.0 mL/kg) and 44.0 mL/kg (IQR: 38.7-49.5 mL/kg) in the hemodialysis and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Hb concentration was lower in hemodialysis patients (p < 0.001), whereas no difference in total Hb mass was observed between groups (p = 0.11). A correlation was found between blood volume measured by the CO-rebreathing test and the dual-isotope labeling technique in the control group (r = 0.83, p = 0.015), but not the hemodialysis group (r = 0.25, p = 0.60).

DISCUSSION

The hemodialysis group had increased specific blood volume at dry weight due to high plasma volume, suggesting a hypervolemic state. However, correlation was not established against the dual-isotope labeling technique underlining that the precision of the CO-rebreathing test should be further validated. The total Hb mass was similar between hemodialysis patients and controls, unlike Hb concentration, which emphasizes that Hb concentration is an inaccurate marker of anemia among hemodialysis patients.

Dynamics of Plasma Refill Rate and Intradialytic Hypotension During Hemodialysis: Retrospective Cohort Study With Causal Methodology

Key Points

Directly studying plasma refill rate (PRR) during hemodialysis (HD) can offer insight into physiologic mechanisms that change throughout HD. PRR at the start and during HD is associated with intradialytic hypotension, independent of ultrafiltration rate. A rising PRR during HD may be an early indicator of compensatory mechanisms for impending circulatory instability.

Background

Attaining the optimal balance between achieving adequate volume removal while preserving organ perfusion is a challenge for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD). Current strategies to guide ultrafiltration are inadequate.

Methods

We developed an approach to calculate the plasma refill rate (PRR) throughout HD using hematocrit and ultrafiltration data in a retrospective cohort of patients receiving maintenance HD at 17 dialysis units from January 2017 to October 2019. We studied whether (1 ) PRR is associated with traditional risk factors for hemodynamic instability using logistic regression, (2 ) low starting PRR is associated with intradialytic hypotension (IDH) using Cox proportional hazard regression, and (3 ) time-varying PRR throughout HD is associated with hypotension using marginal structural modeling.

Results

During 180,319 HD sessions among 2554 patients, PRR had high within-patient and between-patient variability. Female sex and hypoalbuminemia were associated with low PRR at multiple time points during the first hour of HD. Low starting PRR has a higher hazard of IDH, whereas high starting PRR was protective (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.35 versus HR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.85, respectively). However, when accounting for time-varying PRR and time-varying confounders, compared with a moderate PRR, while a consistently low PRR was associated with increased risk of hypotension (odds ratio [OR], 1.09, 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.16), a consistently high PRR had a stronger association with hypotension within the next 15 minutes (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.45).

Conclusions

We present a straightforward technique to quantify plasma refill that could easily integrate with devices that monitor hematocrit during HD. Our study highlights how examining patterns of plasma refill may enhance our understanding of circulatory changes during HD, an important step to understand how current technology might be used to improve hemodynamic instability.

Effect of Intradialytic Aerobic Exercise on Relative Blood Volume in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the relative blood volume because of intradialytic exercise. Twenty patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) were assigned randomly to exercise or control sessions as a first test by simple randomization. All participants were crossed over and participated in both tests. In the exercise test, each patient underwent 30 minutes of exercise using a cycle ergometer from the initiation of HD. The control session consisted of routine HD without exercise. The blood volume (ΔBV) reduction in both types of sessions was calculated from the area under the curve of the ΔBV (ΔBVAUC) from the initiation of HD to the end of exercise (During Ex), from the end of exercise to the end of HD (Post Ex), and during the entire HD session (Whole HD). The ΔBVAUC of Post Ex in the exercise test (44.9 ± 14.3%h) was significantly smaller than that in the control test (50.3 ± 14.3%h) (p < 0.05), although other parameters such as ΔBVAUC either in the entire HD session or during exercise training did not differ significantly between two groups. This result suggests that intradialytic exercise at the beginning of the HD sessions may be altered the ΔBV in the latter part of the session.

The Nephrologist's Role in the Collaborative Multi-Specialist Network Taking Care of Patients with Diabetes on Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Overview

Diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of renal failure in incident dialysis patients in several countries around the world. The quality of life for patients with diabetes in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) treatment is in general poor due to disease complications. Nephrologists have to cope with all these problems because of the “total care model” and strive to improve their patients’ outcome. In this review, an updated overview of the aspects the nephrologist must face in the management of these patients is reported. The conventional marker of glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), is unreliable. HD itself may be responsible for dangerous hypoglycemic events. New methods of glucose control could be used even during dialysis, such as a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The pharmacological control of diabetes is another complex topic. Because of the risk of hypoglycemia, insulin and other medications used to treat diabetes may need dose adjustment. The new class of antidiabetic drugs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors can safely be used in non-insulin-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Nephrologists should take care to improve the hemodynamic tolerance to HD treatment, frequently compromised by the high level of ultrafiltration needed to counter high interdialytic weight gain. Kidney and pancreas transplantation, in selected patients with diabetes, is the best therapy and is the only approach able to free patients from both dialysis and insulin therapy.

Proportional integral feedback control of ultrafiltration rate in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Most hemodialysis patients without residual kidney function accumulate fluid between dialysis session that needs to be removed by ultrafiltration. Ultrafiltration usually results in a decline in relative blood volume (RBV). Recent epidemiological research has identified RBV ranges that were associated with significantly better survival. The objective of this work was to develop an ultrafiltration controller to steer a patient's RBV trajectory into these favorable RBV ranges.

METHODS

We designed a proportional-integral feedback ultrafiltration controller that utilizes signals from a device that reports RBV. The control goal is to attain the RBV trajectory associated with improved patient survival. Additional constraints such as upper and lower bounds of ultrafiltration volume and rate were realized. The controller was evaluated in in silico and ex vivo bench experiments, and in a clinical proof-of-concept study in two maintenance dialysis patients.

RESULTS

In all tests, the ultrafiltration controller performed as expected. In the in silico and ex vivo bench experiments, the controller showed robust reaction toward deliberate disruptive interventions (e.g. signal noise; extreme plasma refill rates). No adverse events were observed in the clinical study.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrafiltration controller can steer RBV trajectories toward desired RBV ranges while obeying to a set of constraints. Prospective studies in hemodialysis patients with diverse clinical characteristics are warranted to further explore the controllers impact on intradialytic hemodynamic stability, quality of life, and long-term outcomes.

Diagnostic accuracy of internal jugular vein ultrasound in quantification of the central venous pressure for hemodialysis patients

Background

Assessment of the central venous pressure (CVP) is an essential hemodynamic parameter for monitoring the dialyzing patients. Our objective of the present study is to investigate the accuracy of CVP measurement by internal jugular vein US in comparison to the direct measurement by the central venous catheters for hemodialysis patients. We included 106 patients; where their CVP was assessed in two different non invasive US methods (CVPni) separately and in combination and the obtained measurements were correlated to the invasive measurements (CVPi) by catheters.

Results

By method 1, there is a highly significant positive correlation between CVPni and CVPi (ρ < 0.001) and a Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.913 n = 93), and by method 2, there is also a highly significant positive correlation between the CVPni and CVPi in both groups (r = 0.832, 95%, n = 106, p < 0.001), 1.935 was the cut-off point for prediction of CVP ≥ 10cmH20. For differentiation between patients with CVP < 10cmH20 and ≥ 10cmH20, the accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy) were 100%, 79.31%, 74.47%, 100%, and 87.10% by method 1, and were 91.11%, 85.48%, 82.00%, 92.98%, and 87.85% by method 2, while the combination of both methods had gained 88.57%, 89.66%, 83.78%, 92.86%, and 89.25%, respectively.

Conclusion

The US offered a reliable and non-invasive tool for monitoring CVP. The present study has a novelty of combining more than one US method and this had reported higher accuracy measures and outperformed the use of a single method.

Absolute blood volume variations and vascular refilling in hemodialysis patients

The imbalance between ultrafiltration volume (UF) and vascular refilling is considered a major cause for intradialytic hypotension. Recent studies report a noninvasive method to estimate vascular refilling (V_REF ) by determining absolute blood volume (ABV). It was the aim of the study to analyze variations in ABV in a group of hemodialysis (HD) patients and examine V_REF . Thirty one stable chronic HD patients were studied, aged 71.07 ± 13.31 years. Dialysis duration and UF requirements were based on physician prescription. V_REF was calculated as: V_REF  = V_UF  - ΔV where ΔV is ABV variation during dialysis treatment. ABV at the beginning of the dialysis was 6.00 ± 2.39 L (92.82 ± 33.17 ml/kg) and at the end 5.38 ± 2.32 L (82.07 ± 31.41 ml/kg). Prescribed UF was 2.64 ± 0.83 L. Mean V_REF was 2.05 ± 0.80 L, with a refilling fraction of 75.75 ± 12.79%. V_REF was strongly correlated with UF volume (r² 0.877), and with pre-dialysis volume overload (r² 0.617). Patients under beta-blocker treatment showed significantly lower F_REF . ABV measurement is an easy and noninvasive method that allows us to study V_REF during HD. We found a strong correlation between V_REF and UF.

Relationship between blood pressure response during hemodialysis and exercise tolerance or heart rate recovery measured using cardio-pulmonary exercise testing in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Background

This study investigated the association between the blood pressure response during hemodialysis (HD) and exercise tolerance or heart rate recovery (HRR) measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX).

Methods

The study enrolled 23 patients who had been undergoing 4-h regular maintenance HD. The maximum workload (Loadpeak), peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), workload and oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (LoadAT and VO2AT, respectively), and HRR were measured with CPX. The average systolic blood pressure during HD (SBPav) was measured, and the number of times the SBP was less than 100 mmHg was determined in the 2-week period after CPX.

Results

The SBPav showed a significant correlation with LoadAT (r = 0.46) and Loadpeak (r = 0.43, p < 0.05). The number of times the SBP was less than 100 mmHg showed a significant correlation with the HRR (r = − 0.44, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Exercise intolerance and HRR in HD patients may be associated with blood pressure instability during HD.

Hemodialysis crossover study using a relative blood volume change-guided ultrafiltration control compared with standard hemodialysis: the BV-UFC study

Background

It has been difficult to sufficiently achieve body-fluid management using blood volume (BV) monitor during hemodialysis (HD) with constant ultrafiltration (UF) rate. Recently, a relative BV change-guided UF control (BV-UFC) system was developed by combining the concepts of an automatic feedback system that could control the UF rate and profile with real- time monitoring of relative changes in BV (%ΔBV). However, this system has limited application in the clinical setting. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to perform the crossover study on HD with BV-UFC compared to standard HD in terms of hemodynamic stability during HD.

Methods

Forty-eight patients entered an 8-week crossover period of standard HD or HD with BV-UFC. Prevalence of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) as a primary outcome and changes in blood pressure (BP), differences in %ΔBV, and achievement of the target ultrafiltration volume as secondary outcomes were compared. IDH was defined as a reduction in systolic BP ≥20 mmHg from the baseline value at 10 min after HD initiation.

Results

No significant differences were found in the prevalence of IDH, frequency of intervention for symptomatic IDH, and achievement of the target ultrafiltration volume between the groups. The %ΔBV was significantly fewer (-12.1 ± 4.8% vs. -14.4 ± 5.2%, p <0.001) in the HD with BV-UFC than that in the standard HD.

Conclusions

HD with BV-UFC did not reduce the prevalence of IDH compared with standard HD. The relief of a relative BV reduction at the end of HD may be beneficial in patients undergoing HD with BV-UFC.

Trial Registration

UMIN, UMIN000024670. Registered on December 1, 2016.

Intravascular albumin loss is strongly associated with plasma volume withdrawal in dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Low circulating albumin closely predicts mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The cause(s) of hypoalbuminemia (hALB) in ESRD patients remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of plasma volume (PV) withdrawal in the reduction of total circulating albumin and essential blood solutes induced by hemodialysis (HD).

METHODS

PV determined with high-precision automated carbon monoxide-rebreathing, total circulating as well as concentration of plasma albumin and electrolytes were assessed prior to and after 4-hour HD in 10 ESRD patients.

FINDINGS

Baseline PV ranged from 3.5 to 6.2 l. After HD, PV was decreased by 689 ± 566 mL (-16%) (P = 0.004). Total circulating albumin was largely reduced after HD (170.8 ± 35.1 vs. 146.1 ± 48.9 g, P = 0.008), while albumin concentration was unaltered. According to a strong linear relationship (r = 0.91, P < 0.001), one-third of total circulating albumin is lost from the intravascular compartment for every liter of PV removed. Similar results were found regarding Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ electrolytes.

DISCUSSION

Total circulating albumin, but not albumin concentration, is substantially reduced by HD in proportion to the amount of PV removed from the circulation. This study highlights the potential contributing role of PV withdrawal to hALB in ESRD patients.

Fluid and hemodynamic management in hemodialysis patients: challenges and opportunities

Fluid volume and hemodynamic management in hemodialysis patients is an essential component of dialysis adequacy. Restoring salt and water homeostasis in hemodialysis patients has been a permanent quest by nephrologists summarized by the ‘dry weight’ probing approach. Although this clinical approach has been associated with benefits on cardiovascular outcome, it is now challenged by recent studies showing that intensity or aggressiveness to remove fluid during intermittent dialysis is associated with cardiovascular stress and potential organ damage. A more precise approach is required to improve cardiovascular outcome in this high-risk population. Fluid status assessment and monitoring rely on four components: clinical assessment, non-invasive instrumental tools (e.g., US, bioimpedance, blood volume monitoring), cardiac biomarkers (e.g. natriuretic peptides), and algorithm and sodium modeling to estimate mass transfer. Optimal management of fluid and sodium imbalance in dialysis patients consist in adjusting salt and fluid removal by dialysis (ultrafiltration, dialysate sodium) and by restricting salt intake and fluid gain between dialysis sessions. Modern technology using biosensors and feedback control tools embarked on dialysis machine, with sophisticated analytics will provide direct handling of sodium and water in a more precise and personalized way. It is envisaged in the near future that these tools will support physician decision making with high potential of improving cardiovascular outcome.

Feedback control of absolute blood volume: A new technical approach in hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The success of automatic feedback control systems to improve hemodynamic stability by preventing relative blood volume from dropping beyond a critical value during dialysis is limited. The aim of this study was to use one of these systems for control of absolute rather than relative blood volume to prevent volume-dependent morbid events.

METHODS

Dialysis was delivered by a machine providing feedback control of ultrafiltration rates, relative blood volume monitoring, and accurate bolus infusion of 240 mL of dialysate to measure absolute blood volume at the beginning of dialysis. Critical relative blood volume required by the control algorithm was calculated from absolute blood volume at the beginning and a critical absolute blood volume of 67 mL/kg.

FINDINGS

In 40 stable patients, ultrafiltration was guided by blood volume using the feedback algorithm of the integrated program. Blood volume was maintained in a narrow range above the prespecified minimal value of 67 mL/kg. At the end of dialysis, absolute blood volume ranged from 67.5 to 72.5 mL/kg (69.4 ± 1.3 mL/kg). No volume-dependent intradialytic morbid event occurred.

DISCUSSION

A feedback control system for relative blood volume-controlled ultrafiltration can be used for control of absolute blood volume. A prescribed target of absolute blood volume can be converted into relative blood volume, and this can subsequently be reached automatically with the integrated feedback system of the dialysis machine. Intradialytic morbid events could be considerably reduced. The whole procedure could be completely automated without altering the hardware of the dialysis device.

Effects of hemodialysis on blood volume, macro- and microvascular function

BACKGROUND

Vascular dysfunction is considered to spur the progression of cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Whether the HD procedure itself contributes to vascular dysfunction remains incompletely investigated. The present study sought to comprehensively assess the effects of HD on arterial and venous function along with concomitant changes in blood volume (BV).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined BV with high-precision, automated carbon monoxide-rebreathing, arterial stiffness using applanation tonometry and intrinsic microvascular function via retinal vessel analysis prior to and after conventional 4-hour HD in fasting-controlled conditions in 10 patients. All HD patients were non-smokers and non-obese (body mass index = 22.8 ± 2.8 m·kg^-2). Hypertension (70%), coronary artery disease (40%) and diabetes mellitus (20%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Prior to HD, all patients presented with hypervolemia (+2208 ± 1213 ml). HD decreased body weight (-1.72 ± 1.25 kg, P = 0.002) and plasma volume (-689 ± 566 ml, P = 0.004), while hematocrit (Hct) was concomitantly increased (+4.8 ± 4.5%, P = 0.009). HD did not affect large elastic artery stiffness, as determined by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (P = 0.448) and carotid distensibility (P = 0.562). In contrast, flicker light-induced retinal venular dilation was reduced by three-fourths after HD (-2.4 ± 1.7%, P = 0.039), in parallel to increased retinal venular diameter (+11.2 ± 4.9 μm, P = 0.002). In regression analyses, a negative association was observed between HD-induced changes in Hct and retinal venular dilation (r ≥ -0.89, P ≤ 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Conventional HD resulting in substantial plasma volume removal do not alter large artery elastic properties, whereas intrinsic microvascular venular dilator function is markedly impaired, an effect directly associated with the increase in hemoconcentration.

Non-invasive hemodynamic profiling of patients undergoing hemodialysis - a multicenter observational cohort study

Background

Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) measurement is currently the main parameter used for monitoring hemodynamics during hemodialysis (HD). Since BP is dependent on cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, knowledge of these parameters throughout the HD treatment would potentially be valuable.

Methods

The use of a novel non-invasive monitoring system for profiling hemodynamic response patterns during HD was explored: a whole-body bio-impedance system was used to assess cardiac index (CI), total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), cardiac power index (CPI) among other parameters in chronic HD patients from 4 medical centers. Measurements were made pre, during and post dialysis. Patients were grouped into 5 hemodynamic profiles based on their main hemodynamic response during dialysis i.e. high TPRI; high CPI; low CPI; low TPRI and those with normal hemodynamics. Comparisons were made between the groups for baseline characteristics and 1-year mortality.

Results

In 144 patients with mean age of 67.3 ± 12.1 years pre-dialysis hemodynamic measurements were within normal limits in 35.4% but only 6.9% overall remained hemodynamically stable during dialysis. Intradialytic BP decreased in 65 (45.1%) in whom, low CPI (47 (72.3%)) and low TPRI (18 (27.7%) were recorded. At 1-year follow-up, mortality rates were highest in patients with low CPI (23.4%) and low TPRI (22.2%).

Conclusions

Non-invasive assessment of patients’ response to HD provides relevant hemodynamic information that exceeds that provided by currently used BP measurements. Use of these online analyses could potentially improve the safety and performance standards of dialysis by guiding appropriate interventions, particularly in responding to hypertension and hypotension.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1542-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hemodialysis-induced changes in hematocrit, hemoglobin and total protein: Implications for relative blood volume monitoring

Background

Relative blood volume (RBV) changes during hemodialysis (HD) are typically estimated based on online measurements of hematocrit, hemoglobin or total blood protein. The aim of this study was to assess changes in the above parameters during HD in order to compare the potential differences in the RBV changes estimated by individual methods.

Methods

25 anuric maintenance HD patients were monitored during a 1-week conventional HD treatment. Blood samples were collected from the arterial dialysis blood line at the beginning and at the end of each HD session. The analysis of blood samples was performed using the hematology analyzer Advia 2120 and clinical chemistry analyzer Advia 1800 (Siemens Healthcare).

Results

During the analyzed 30 HD sessions with ultrafiltration in the range 0.7–4.0 L (2.5 ± 0.8 L) hematocrit (HCT) increased by 9.1 ± 7.0% (mean ± SD), hemoglobin (HGB) increased by 10.6 ± 6.3%, total plasma protein (TPP) increased by 15.6 ± 9.5%, total blood protein (TBP) increased by 10.4 ± 5.8%, red blood cell count (RBC) increased by 10.8 ± 7.1%, while mean corpuscular red cell volume (MCV) decreased by 1.5 ± 1.1% (all changes statistically significant, p < 0.001). HGB increased on average by 1.5% more than HCT (p < 0.001). The difference between HGB and TBP increase was insignificant (p = 0.16).

Conclusions

Tracking HGB or TBP can be treated as equivalent for the purpose of estimating RBV changes during HD. Due to the reduction of MCV, the HCT-based estimate of RBV changes may underestimate the actual blood volume changes.

A feedback system that combines monitoring of systolic blood pressure and relative blood volume in order to prevent hypotensive episodes during dialysis

Hypotensive Episodes (HEs) are one of the most common complications during dialysis. Occurrence of HEs can be reduced by applying physiological closed loop systems that monitor physiological parameter(s) and adjust dialysis related parameter(s). We developed a physiological closed loop control system (PCLCS) that monitors systolic blood pressure (sysBP) and relative blood volume (RBV) and calculates the net fluid removal (nfr) rate during dialysis. The performance of PCLCS was compared in the laboratory to a feedback system that monitors only RBV (BVFS). A laboratory test setup was developed to test the feedback systems. The test setup simulates nfr-rate and refilling of a patient's intravascular fluid. We studied the impact of the feedback systems PCLCS and BVFS on the number of HEs (sysBP < 90 mmHg), on the variance of sysBP and RBV, on pre to post sysBP and RBV and on the achievement of the nfr-volume. PCLCS allowed 80% less HEs than BVFS (p < 0.001). Variance of sysBP and RBV were reduced by 41.8% and by 52% (p < 0.001), respectively, when using PCLCS. There were no differences between pre to post sysBP nor between pre to post RBV when comparing PCLCS to BVFS. The nfr-volume was achieved by both feedback systems.

Individualization of Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis

OBJECTIVES

There are approximately 660 000 end-stage renal disease patients in the USA, with hemodialysis (HD) the primary form of treatment. High ultrafiltration rates (UFRs) are associated with intradialytic hypotension, a complication associated with adverse clinical outcomes including mortality. Individualized UFR profiles could reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.

METHODS

The patient's fluid dynamics during HD is described by a nonlinear model comprising intravascular and interstitial pools, whose parameters are given by the patient's estimated nominal parameter values with uncertainty ranges; the output measurement is hematocrit. We design UFR profiles that minimize the maximal UFR needed to remove a prescribed volume of fluid within a set time, with hematocrit not exceeding a specified time-varying critical profile.

RESULTS

We present a novel approach to design individualized UFR profiles, and give theoretical results guaranteeing that the system remains within a predefined physiologically plausible region and does not exceed a specified time-invariant critical hematocrit level for all parameters in the uncertainty ranges. We test the performance of our design using a real patient data example. The designed UFR maintains the system below a time-varying critical hematocrit profile in the example.

CONCLUSION

Theoretical results and simulations show that our designed UFR profiles can remove the target amount of fluid in a given time period while keeping the hematocrit below a specified critical profile.

SIGNIFICANCE

Individualization of UFR profiles is now feasible using current HD technology and may reduce the incidence of intradialytic hypotension.

Ultrasonographic assessment of the internal jugular vein for the estimation of central venous pressure in hemodialysis patients: A preliminary study

PURPOSE

To investigate a new noninvasive method to assess central venous pressure (CVP) in hemodialysis patients, based on the ultrasonographic measurement of the collapsing point of the internal jugular vein (CVPni).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this preliminary, noninterventional, single center study, we enrolled 22 dialyzed patients with an indwelling jugular catheter. CVPni was compared to the gold-standard invasive measurement of CVP using the central venous catheter (CVPi). Agreement between CVPi and CVPni was assessed by Bland and Altman Method. Correlation was assessed by linear regression.

RESULTS

A strong correlation was observed between CVPi and CVPni (OR = 3.47 [2.96; 4.07], P < .0001). For overloaded patients, the area under the curve for the operating characteristic curve was 0.971 (IC95: 0.915; 1.000). For under-loaded patients, area under the curve was 0.971 (IC95: 0.917; 1.000). The mean bias between intra-individual CVPi and CVPni measures was 0.57 cm H₂ O (SD: 3.1 cm H₂ O).

CONCLUSION

CVPni appears as a noninvasive and reliable technique. Further studies are required to confirm these results and to assess the direct clinical impact of this new method.

Hemodialysis Ultrafiltration Rate Targets Should Be Scaled to Body Surface Area Rather than to Body Weight

The association between higher ultrafiltration rates and poor outcomes in hemodialysis patients has received increased attention, to the point that various regulatory entities are considering adding ultrafiltration rate as a quality measure to be monitored and controlled. Most of the discussion to date has focused on ultrafiltration rate scaled to body weight, or more correctly, body mass (ml/hour per kg). One outcome study suggests that ultrafiltration rate might best be not scaled at all to body size, as modestly higher ultrafiltration rate in very small-size patients may be associated with some survival benefit, probably via increased dietary intake. Outcomes studies also suggest that the risk of exceeding a weight-scaled ultrafiltration target may be magnified in very large patients, and that body weight-scaled ultrafiltration targets in such patients should be set a lower level. Here, we present an analysis, based on physiological hemodynamic arguments, that it would be better to scale ultrafiltration rate to body surface area rather than to body mass. Whatever ultrafiltration rate is scaled to, attempts to restrict ultrafiltration rate by limiting interdialytic weight gain in small, possibly malnourished patients, should be done cautiously, to prevent an inadvertent lowering of intake of calories and dietary protein.

Techniques for assessing fluids status in patients with kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to present current information on techniques for fluid status assessment in patients with kidney disease. The methods can be broadly categorized into biomarkers, ultrasound, blood volume monitoring, and bioimpedance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomarkers including atrial natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide have been shown to provide information about relative changes in fluid status. Ultrasound is applied to measure inferior vena cava indices, pulmonary indicators, and vascular indicators of fluid overload. Relative blood volume monitoring is used to measure change in intravascular fluid during hemodialysis. While in principle appealing, measurement of absolute blood volume has seen limited use to date. Bioimpedance techniques such as vector analysis, whole body, and regional bioimpedance spectroscopy, have shown their ability to estimate fluid status.

SUMMARY

The interpretation of biomarkers is complicated by the presence of cardiac disease. All ultrasound methods have some correlation with fluid status; however, operator dependency limits their routine use. Bioimpedance methods and relative blood volume monitoring are increasingly used to assess fluid status in patients with acute or chronic kidney disease. Measurement of absolute blood volume holds promise for the future.

Estimation of peripheral blood volume and interstitial volume in hemodialysis patients using bioimpedance techniques

This paper describes a method to estimate interstitial fluid volume and peripheral blood volume (BV_P) in hemodialysis (HD) patients using whole body (wBIS) and calf (cBIS) bioimpedance spectroscopy techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the technique. Thirty five HD patients were studied pre and post HD. Extracellular volume (ECV) and total body water (TBW) were measured using wBIS and cBIS. The calf resistances at 5 kHz (R₅) and at 1000 kHz (R₁₀₀₀) respectively reflect ECV and TBW in the calf. A blood pressure cuff was placed over the area of cBIS. Regional and whole body plasma or BV_P and interstitial (V_IT) or total fluid volume are measured at R₅ or R₁₀₀₀ when the cuff was inflated to just above the systolic blood pressure. According to calf normalized resistivity (CNR) post HD, patients were divided into two groups: overhydration (OH, CNR<;18.5, 10^-2*Ωm³/kg) and normal hydration (NH, CNR≥18.5, 10^-2*Ωm³/kg). BV_P was higher in OH than in NH group which can be explained by the low ratio of change in V_IT to ultrafiltration volume in the OH group (0.57±0.23 vs 0.83±0.45 L, p<;0.05). In conclusion, the method could be useful to better understand fluid dynamics during HD.

Comparison of stroke volume measurements during hemodialysis using bioimpedance cardiography and echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Fluid management remains a major challenge of hemodialysis (HD) care, with serious implications for morbidity and mortality. Intradialytic fluid management is typically guided by blood pressure, an indirect resultant of hemodynamics status. Direct measurements of hemodynamic parameters may improve cardiovascular outcomes by providing rational bases for intervention. We compare stroke volume (SV) measurements using a noninvasive, regional biompedance cardiography device (NiCaS) with Doppler echocardiography (Echo) in HD setting.

METHODS

Stroke volumes were simultaneously measured using the devices in 17 patients receiving maintenance HD. Measurements were made during 2 weekly HD treatments, and twice within each HD treatment during the first and last hour of each treatment, for a total of 64 SV measurements. Agreement between devices was assessed using linear regression, a Pearson's correlation coefficient, and a Bland-Altman plot all adjusted for repeated measures within patients.

RESULTS

Echo and NiCaS SV mean and 95% CIs were 58.0 (50.1, 65.8) and 56.7 (49.4, 64.0) mL, respectively. NiCaS SV correlated strongly with Echo SV during the first and last hours of treatments (r = 0.93, P < 0.001 and r = 0.92, P < 0.001, respectively). Linear regression of NiCaS on Echo showed a slope of 0.97, 95% CI (0.91, 1.02) which did not differ from 1, P = 0.20. A Bland-Altman plot and 4-Quadrant plot confirmed that the 2 methods produced comparable measurements.

CONCLUSION

NiCaS SV measurements are similar to and strongly correlated with Echo SV measurements. This suggests that noninvasive NiCaS technology may be a practical method for measuring SV during HD.

Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) before, during and after Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED). A Prospective Study on Feasibility of TPTD and Prediction of Successful Fluid Removal

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients. AKI requires renal replacement therapy (RRT) in up to 10% of patients. Particularly during connection and fluid removal, RRT frequently impairs haemodyamics which impedes recovery from AKI. Therefore, "acute" connection with prefilled tubing and prolonged periods of RRT including sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) has been suggested. Furthermore, advanced haemodynamic monitoring using trans-pulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and pulse contour analysis (PCA) might help to define appropriate fluid removal goals.

OBJECTIVES, METHODS

Since data on TPTD to guide RRT are scarce, we investigated the capabilities of TPTD- and PCA-derived parameters to predict feasibility of fluid removal in 51 SLED-sessions (Genius; Fresenius, Germany; blood-flow 150 mL/min) in 32 patients with PiCCO-monitoring (Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany). Furthermore, we sought to validate the reliability of TPTD during RRT and investigated the impact of "acute" connection and of disconnection with re-transfusion on haemodynamics. TPTDs were performed immediately before and after connection as well as disconnection.

RESULTS

Comparison of cardiac index derived from TPTD (CItd) and PCA (CIpc) before, during and after RRT did not give hints for confounding of TPTD by ongoing RRT. Connection to RRT did not result in relevant changes in haemodynamic parameters including CItd. However, disconnection with re-transfusion of the tubing volume resulted in significant increases in CItd, CIpc, CVP, global end-diastolic volume index GEDVI and cardiac power index CPI. Feasibility of the pre-defined ultrafiltration goal without increasing catecholamines by >10% (primary endpoint) was significantly predicted by baseline CPI (ROC-AUC 0.712; p = 0.010) and CItd (ROC-AUC 0.662; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD is feasible during SLED. "Acute" connection does not substantially impair haemodynamics. Disconnection with re-transfusion increases preload, CI and CPI. The extent of these changes might be used as a "post-RRT volume change" to guide fluid removal during subsequent RRTs. CPI is the most useful marker to guide fluid removal by SLED.

Impact of extracorporeal blood flow rate on blood pressure, pulse rate and cardiac output during haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

If blood pressure (BP) falls during haemodialysis (HD) [intradialytic hypotension (IDH)] a common clinical practice is to reduce the extracorporeal blood flow rate (EBFR). Consequently the efficacy of the HD (Kt/V) is reduced. However, only very limited knowledge on the effect of reducing EBFR on BP exists and data are conflicting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect and the potential mechanism(s) involved by investigating the impact of changes in EBFR on BP, pulse rate (PR) and cardiac output (CO) in HD patients with arteriovenous-fistulas (AV-fistulas).

METHODS

We performed a randomized, crossover trial in 22 haemodynamically stable HD patients with AV-fistula. After a conventional HD session each patient was examined during EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min in random order. After 15 min when steady state was achieved CO, BP and PR were measured at each EFBR, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age was 71 (11) years. Systolic BP was significantly higher at an EBFR of 200 mL/min as compared with 300 mL/min [133 (23) versus 128 (24) mmHg; P < 0.05], but not as compared with 400 mL/min [133 (23) versus 130 (19) mmHg; P = 0.20]. At EBFR of 200, 300 and 400 mL/min diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure, PR and CO remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Our study does not show any consistent trend in BP changes by a reduction in EBFR. Reduction in EBFR if BP falls during IDH is thus not supported. However, none of the patients experienced IDH. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of changes in EBFR on BP during IDH.

A simple and feasible method to determine absolute blood volume in hemodialysis patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

We developed a simple method to determine the absolute blood volume (V) during hemodialysis in everyday clinical practice and examined its relationship with volume overload, clinical relevance, and accuracy.

METHODS

The increase in relative blood volume (RBVpost - RBVpre) measured before and after infusion of 240 ml of ultra-pure dialysate using the bolus function of a commercial online hemodiafiltration machine incorporating a relative blood volume monitor was applied to determine absolute blood volume. The specific blood volume (Vs, blood volume per kg body mass at dry weight, in ml/kg) was compared to volume status as assessed by bioimpedance analysis and clinical criteria.

RESULTS

The blood volume measured in 30 stable hemodialysis patients was 6.51 ± 1.70 l at the beginning, corresponding to a specific blood volume of 80.1 ± 12.8 ml/kg, and dropped to 5.84 ± 1.61 l or 72.0 ± 12.1 ml/kg at the end of the dialysis session, respectively. Specific blood volume correlated with volume status assessed both clinically and by bioimpedance analysis. Intradialytic morbid events occurred only in treatments where specific blood volume fell below 65 ml/kg. The reproducibility of the technique was better than 4% and the in vitro accuracy corresponds to a resolution in Vs of better than 1 ml/kg.

CONCLUSION

Absolute blood volume can be easily measured at the beginning of the dialysis session using the current dialysis technology. Information about V and Vs could be a promising tool to avoid intradialytic morbid events. This technique could be completely automated without altering the hardware of currently available online dialysis devices. Therefore, it is recommended that this technique be integrated into all hemodiafiltration machines.

Changes in volumetric hemodynamic parameters induced by fluid removal on hemodialysis in critically ill patients

Management of volume status is difficult in critically ill patients with renal failure. Volumetric hemodynamic indices are increasingly being used to guide fluid therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU), but are not established to monitor hemodialysis-induced fluid removal in critically ill patients. Using volumetric hemodynamic monitoring, changes in extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) and intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) were measured immediately before and after hemodialysis sessions in 35 ICU patients. Additional hemodynamic and oxygenation related parameters were recorded at the same time, and online relative blood volume (RBV) monitoring was performed during hemodialysis. EVLWI decreased significantly with fluid removal (median 10.0 vs. 9.6 mL/kg, P = 0.001), whereas ITBVI remained stable (median 1012 vs. 1029 mL/m(2) , P = 0.402). Significant changes were also observed in stroke volume variation (median 12.0 vs. 13.0 %, P = 0.012), cardiac index (median 4.2 vs. 3.5 mL/min/m(2) , P = 0.003), mean arterial pressure (median 77 vs. 85.5 mmHg, P = 0.006), norepinephrine dose (median 0.092 vs. 0.114 μg/kg per min, P = 0.043), and hemoglobin values (median 9.5 vs. 10.4 gm/dL, P = 0.036). RBV decreased by 7.8% (median); there was no correlation with either the volumetric measurements or the other hemodynamic parameters recorded. EVLWI reduction with dialysis reflects the removal of excess body fluid, whereas preservation of cardiac preload is indicated by ITBVI stability. Volumetric hemodynamic measurements provide additional information concerning fluid status and are thus potentially useful to guide fluid removal on hemodialysis in critically ill patients.

Clinical hypotension with co-prescription of macrolide antibiotics and calcium-channel blockers in haemodialysis patients: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics inhibit the cytochrome p450 enzyme system, which metabolizes calcium-channel blockers. This may result in a clinically significant interaction, causing hypotension in patients co-prescribed these two drugs. Since these drugs are frequently used in the haemodialysis population, we studied the effect of their co-prescription on actual blood pressure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all haemodialysis patients was conducted to identify patients co-prescribed a macrolide and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. Blood pressure measurements before and during the macrolide co-prescription were abstracted and compared using a student's t test.

RESULTS

We identified 154 haemodialysis patients concurrently prescribed a macrolide antibiotic and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker. There was no significant difference in episodes of intra-dialytic hypotension or actual blood pressure measurements in the period before macrolide co-prescription and the period during macrolide co-prescription.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to hospitalized patients receiving dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, concurrent administration of a macrolide antibiotic for infection did not result in hypotension in haemodialysis outpatients. Further research should be undertaken before a change in clinical practice against their co-prescription is considered.