Optimization of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy evaluated by grip strength measurement

Individualizing Therapy in CIDP: A Mini-Review Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of Ig With SCIg and IVIg

Immunoglobulin (Ig) therapy is a first-line treatment for CIDP, which can be administered intravenously (IVIg) or subcutaneously (SCIg) and is often required long term. The differences between these modes of administration and how they can affect dosing strategies and treatment optimization need to be understood. In general, the efficacy of IVIg and SCIg appear comparable in CIDP, but SCIg may offer some safety and quality of life advantages to some patients. The differences in pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and infusion regimens account for many of the differences between IVIg and SCIg. IVIg is administered as a large bolus every 3–4 weeks resulting in cyclic fluctuations in Ig concentration that have been linked to systemic adverse events (AEs) (potentially caused by high Ig levels) and end of dose “wear-off” effects (potentially caused by low Ig concentration). SCIg is administered as a smaller weekly, or twice weekly, volume resulting in near steady-state Ig levels that have been linked to continuously maintained function and reduced systemic AEs, but an increase in local reactions at the infusion site. The reduced frequency of systemic AEs observed with SCIg is likely related to the avoidance of high Ig concentrations. Some small studies in immune-mediated neuropathies have focused on serum Ig data to evaluate its potential use as a biomarker to aid clinical decision-making. Analyzing dose data may help understand how establishing and monitoring patients' Ig concentration could aid dose optimization and the transition from IVIg to SCIg therapy.

Randomized trial of intravenous immunoglobulin maintenance treatment regimens in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Background and purpose

High peak serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels may not be needed for maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and such high levels may cause side effects. More frequent lower dosing may lead to more stable IgG levels and higher trough levels, which might improve efficacy. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether high frequent low dosage IVIg treatment is more effective than low frequent high dosage IVIg treatment.

Methods

In this randomized placebo‐controlled crossover trial, we included patients with CIDP proven to be IVIg‐dependent and receiving an individually established stable dose and interval of IVIg maintenance treatment. In the control arm, patients received their individual IVIg dose and interval followed by a placebo infusion at half the interval. In the intervention arm, patients received half their individual dose at half the interval. After a wash‐out phase patients crossed over. The primary outcome measure was handgrip strength (assessed using a Martin Vigorimeter). Secondary outcome indicators were health‐related quality of life (36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey), disability (Inflammatory Rasch‐built Overall Disability Scale), fatigue (Rasch‐built Fatigue Severity Scale) and side effects.

Results

Twenty‐five patients were included and were treated at baseline with individually adjusted dosages of IVIg ranging from 20 to 80 g and intervals ranging from 14 to 35 days. Three participants did not complete the trial; the main analysis was therefore based on the 22 patients completing both treatment periods. There was no significant difference in handgrip strength change from baseline between the two treatment regimens (coefficient −2.71, 95% CI −5.4, 0.01). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes or side effects.

Conclusions

More frequent lower dosing does not further improve the efficacy of IVIg in stable IVIg‐dependent CIDP and does not result in fewer side effects.

Dramatic clinical response to ultra-high dose IVIg in otherwise treatment resistant inflammatory neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has short and long-term efficacy in both chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB). There is potential for under and over-treatment if trial regimens are strictly adhered to in clinical practice where titrating dose to clinical response is recommended.

METHODS

We report the response to high-dose IVIg (>2 g/kg/6 weeks) in a subgroup of patients with definite CIDP or MMNCB who were unresponsive to 'usual' dosing. IVIg frequency and dosing was determined for each individual by subjective and objective outcome measures for impairment, grip strength, and activity and participation.

RESULTS

Six patients (three with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), three with MMN) were included. Two patients (one CIDP and one MMNCB) returned to full-time work on fractionated IVIg doses of 5 g/kg/month and 9 g/kg/month. Patient three (CIDP) failed numerous other immunosuppressants but responded to short-term fractionated 4 g/kg/month of IVIg. Patient four has severe, refractory, childhood-onset CIDP, remains stable but dependent currently on 6.9 g/kg/month of IVIg. Patients five and six, both with MMNCB, required short term 4.5-5 g/kg/month to recover significant bilateral hand strength. No IVIg-related adverse events occurred in any individual.

CONCLUSIONS

These six cases demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a treatment approach that includes individualised but evidence-based clinical assessment and, when necessary, high-doses of IVIg to restore patients' strength and ability to participate in activities of daily activities. Careful patient selection is important.

Daily grip strength response to intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic immune neuropathies

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring grip strength at home may detect improvement between intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatments in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies (CINs).

METHODS

Fifteen patients recorded grip strength each day, from one IVIg treatment until the next. We analyzed grip strength changes comparing thresholds of 8 kPa and 14 kPa. "Random" fluctuations of grip strength were distinguished from treatment response by smoothing the data.

RESULTS

"Random" fluctuations of at least 8 kPa occurred in 27% of patients. Smoothed daily grip strength increased by at least 8 kPa above baseline in 11 (73%) patients. Grip strength increased by at least 8 kPa for 3 consecutive days in 9 (60%) patients, and 5-day block mean increased by at least 8 kPa in 10 (67%) patients.

DISCUSSION

Home monitoring of grip strength confirmed treatment response in most patients with CINs on IVIg. To detect improvement in an individual patient, we suggest a threshold of at least 8 kPa on 3 consecutive days or on 5-day block mean.

Individualized immunoglobulin therapy in chronic immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies

Despite the well-recognized importance of immunoglobulin therapy individualization during the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), the pathway to best achieve optimization is unknown. There are many pharmacokinetic and immunobiologic variables that can potentially influence the appropriateness of any individual therapy. Although identification of specific autoantibodies and their targets has only been accomplished in a minority of patients with CIDP, already the diagnostic and treatment implications of specific autoantibody detection are being realized. Individual variability in IgG pharmacokinetic properties including IgG catabolic rates and distribution, as well as the IgG level necessary for disease control also require consideration during the optimization process. For optimization to be successful there must be a measure of treatment response that has a clinically meaningful interpretation. There are currently available well-defined and validated clinical assessment tools and outcome measures that are well suited for this purpose. While there remains much to learn on how best to manipulate immunopathology and immunoglobulin pharmacokinetics in the most favorable way, there currently exists an understanding of these principles to a degree sufficient to begin to develop rational and evidence-based treatment optimization strategies.

Maintenance IV immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) usually start with a standard dosage of 2 g/kg bodyweight. Only a minority of patients has a sustained improvement, and most require ongoing maintenance treatment. Preferred IVIg regimens, however, vary considerably between doctors and at present it is unknown which is optimal. As there are also large differences in IVIg dosage and interval requirements between patients, optimal IVIg maintenance treatment of CIDP is even more complex. The lack of evidence-based guidelines on how IVIg maintenance treatment should be administered may potentially lead to under- or overtreatment of this expensive therapy. We provide an overview of published practical IVIg maintenance treatment regimens, IVIg maintenance schedules used in randomized controlled trials and one based upon our own long-term experience on how this treatment could be given in CIDP.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Immunoglobulin G Maintenance Therapy in Chronic Immune-mediated Neuropathies

The regimen for IVIg maintenance treatment varies considerably between patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. Although it is widely recognized that treatment regimens should be improved, detailed pharmacokinetics (PK) of IVIg have not yet been established. We aimed to determine the PK of IVIg maintenance treatment in patients with clinically stable, treatment-dependent, chronic immune-mediated neuropathy. Patients received a median IVIg dose of 30 g (range, 15-70 g) every 14 days (range, 7-28 days) resulting in high IgG peak levels (median, 25.9 g/L; range, 16.7-41.0 g/L) and trough levels (median, 16.1 g/L; range, 9.7-23.6 g/L). IgG PK parameters, including half-life (median, 23.1 days; range, 11-60 days), were constant during subsequent courses in the same patients, but varied considerably between patients. The IgG levels at 1 week after infusion correlated with grip strength. These results provide insight into the PK of IVIg maintenance treatment in patients with chronic immune-mediated neuropathies.

Measuring disease activity and clinical response during maintenance therapy in CIDP: from ICE trial outcome measures to future clinical biomarkers

Some patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy who respond to initial intravenous immunoglobulin require repeated courses over prolonged periods of time; however, evidence to guide dosage and interval of intravenous immunoglobulin during maintenance therapy is limited. Optimizing treatment requires assessment of underlying disease activity and clinical outcome. Electrophysiological measures of demyelination, and clinical measures using handgrip strength and walking velocity promise to be particularly informative. Major advances in resolution and image processing have expanded clinical applications for ultrasound to include the study of peripheral nerves. Ultrasonography shows promise in diagnosing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and distinguishing it from other conditions, providing first ever insight into gross pathology of peripheral nerves. Ultrasonography may also have a role in monitoring disease activity and treatment response.

What is new in 2015 in dysimmune neuropathies?

This review discusses and summarizes the concept of nodopathies, the diagnostic features, investigations, pathophysiology, and treatment options of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and gives updates on other inflammatory and dysimmune neuropathies such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, sensory neuronopathies, small-fiber-predominant ganglionitis, POEMS syndrome, neuropathies associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. This field of research has contributed to the antigenic characterization of the peripheral motor and sensory functional systems, as well as helping to define immune neuropathic syndromes with widely different clinical presentation, prognosis and response to therapy.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neurologic disorders

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) are often used in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and immunodeficiencies, and it has been estimated that neurologic indications can account for up to 43% of IVIG used in clinical practice. In neurologic clinical practice, IVIG is used for acute therapy of newly diagnosed autoimmune disorders or exacerbations of pre-existing conditions, or as long-term maintenance treatment for chronic disorders. IVIG exerts its effects on humoral and cell-based immunity through multiple pathways, without a single dominant mechanism. Clinical use of IVIG has been supported by guidelines from American Academy of Neurology and European Federation of Neurologic Societies. IVIG is generally recommended for the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in adults, multifocal motor neuropathy and myasthenia gravis, and should be considered as a treatment option for dermatomyositis in adults and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Additional potential indications include stiff person syndrome, multiple sclerosis during pregnancy or while breastfeeding, refractory autoimmune epilepsy, and paraneoplastic disorders. Clinical use of IVIG is mostly safe but few adverse effects may still occur with potentially severe complications, including aseptic meningitis and thromboembolism. In addition to intravenous route (IVIG), subcutaneous immunoglobulins have been used as an alternative treatment option, especially in patients with limited intravenous access. Treatment with IVIG is effective in various autoimmune diseases, but its broader use is constrained by limited supply. This review evaluates the use of immunoglobulins in treatment of neurologic diseases.

Long-term immunoglobulin therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Immunoglobulins are an effective but expensive treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Although the goal is to improve function, use of functional scales to monitor therapy is not widespread. Limited recent evidence suggests that doses lower than those used traditionally may be as effective. There are no proven correlations of effective dose with weight, disease severity, or duration. The clinical course of CIDP is heterogeneous and includes monophasic forms and complete remissions. Careful monitoring of immunoglobulin use is necessary to avoid overtreatment. Definitive evidence for immunoglobulin superiority over steroids is lacking. Although latest trial evidence favors immunoglobulins over steroids, the latter may result in higher remission rates and longer remission periods. This article addresses the appropriateness of first-line, high-dose immunoglobulin treatment for CIDP and reviews important clinical questions regarding the need for long-term therapy protocols, adequate monitoring, treatment withdrawal, and consideration of corticosteroids as an alternative to immunoglobulin therapy.

Is dosing of therapeutic immunoglobulins optimal? A review of a three-decade long debate in europe

The consumption of immunoglobulins (Ig) is increasing due to better recognition of antibody deficiencies, an aging population, and new indications. This review aims to examine the various dosing regimens and research developments in the established and in some of the relevant off-label indications in Europe. The background to the current regulatory settings in Europe is provided as a backdrop for the latest developments in primary and secondary immunodeficiencies and in immunomodulatory indications. In these heterogeneous areas, clinical trials encompassing different routes of administration, varying intervals, and infusion rates are paving the way toward more individualized therapy regimens. In primary antibody deficiencies, adjustments in dosing and intervals will depend on the clinical presentation, effective IgG trough levels and IgG metabolism. Ideally, individual pharmacokinetic profiles in conjunction with the clinical phenotype could lead to highly tailored treatment. In practice, incremental dosage increases are necessary to titrate the optimal dose for more severely ill patients. Higher intravenous doses in these patients also have beneficial immunomodulatory effects beyond mere IgG replacement. Better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of Ig therapy is leading to a move away from simplistic "per kg" dosing. Defective antibody production is common in many secondary immunodeficiencies irrespective of whether the causative factor was lymphoid malignancies (established indications), certain autoimmune disorders, immunosuppressive agents, or biologics. This antibody failure, as shown by test immunization, may be amenable to treatment with replacement Ig therapy. In certain immunomodulatory settings [e.g., idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)], selection of patients for Ig therapy may be enhanced by relevant biomarkers in order to exclude non-responders and thus obtain higher response rates. In this review, the developments in dosing of therapeutic immunoglobulins have been limited to high and some medium priority indications such as ITP, Kawasaki' disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, multifocal motor neuropathy, fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, fetal hemolytic anemia, and dermatological diseases.

Rapid and reversible responses to IVIG in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases suggest mechanisms of action involving competition with functionally important autoantibodies

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases whose pathogenesis is undefined. Many different effects of IVIG have been demonstrated in vitro, but few studies actually identify the mechanism(s) most important in vivo. Doses and treatment intervals are generally chosen empirically. Recent studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy show that some effects of IVIG are readily reversible and highly dependent on the serum IgG level. This suggests that in some autoantibody-mediated neuromuscular diseases, IVIG directly competes with autoantibodies that reversibly interfere with nerve conduction. Mechanisms of action of IVIG which most likely involve direct competition with autoantibodies include: neutralization of autoantibodies by anti-idiotypes, inhibition of complement deposition, and increasing catabolism of pathologic antibodies by saturating FcRn. Indirect immunomodulatory effects are not as likely to involve competition and may not have the same reversibility and dose-dependency. Pharmacodynamic analyses should be informative regarding most relevant mechanism(s) of action of IVIG as well as the role of autoantibodies in the immunopathogenesis of each disease. Better understanding of the role of autoantibodies and of the target(s) of IVIG could lead to more efficient use of this therapy and better patient outcomes.