Unmet therapeutic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis

A Deficiency in the Cytokine TNFSF14/LIGHT Limits Inflammation and Remodeling in Murine Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 allergic disease, with esophageal tissue remodeling as the mechanism behind clinical dysphagia and strictures. IL-13 is thought to be a central driver of disease, but other inflammatory factors, such as IFNs and TNF superfamily members, have been hypothesized to play a role in disease pathogenesis. We recently found that the cytokine TNFSF14/LIGHT is upregulated in the esophagus of patients with EoE and that LIGHT promotes inflammatory activity in esophageal fibroblasts. However, the global effects of LIGHT on EoE pathogenesis in vivo remain unknown. We investigated the impact of a LIGHT deficiency in a murine model of EoE driven by house dust mite allergen. Chronic intranasal challenge with house dust mite promoted esophageal eosinophilia and increased CD4+ T cell numbers and IL-13 and CCL11 production in wild-type mice. Esophageal remodeling was reflected by submucosal collagen accumulation, increased muscle density, and greater numbers of fibroblasts. LIGHT-/- mice displayed normal esophageal eosinophilia, but exhibited reduced frequencies of CD4 T cells, IL-13 expression, submucosal collagen, and muscle density and a decrease in esophageal accumulation of fibroblasts. In vitro, LIGHT increased division of human esophageal fibroblasts and selectively enhanced IL-13-mediated expression of a subset of inflammatory and fibrotic genes. These results show that LIGHT contributes to various features of murine EoE, impacting the accumulation of CD4 T cells, IL-13 production, fibroblast proliferation, and esophagus remodeling. These findings suggest that LIGHT may be, to our knowledge, a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of EoE.

An Update on Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Etiological Factors, Coexisting Diseases, and Complications

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated clinicopathological condition characterized by esophageal infiltration with eosinophils resulting in chronic inflammation and stricture.

SUMMARY

The recent increase in the incidence of EoE and the characteristic presentation of symptoms with difficulty swallowing and food bolus impaction has raised key concerns of clinicians as well as researchers. EoE often presents with dysphagia, food impaction, nausea, regurgitation or vomiting, and decreased appetite. It is more common in males, affecting both adults and children. The causative manner of this condition is complex and multifactorial. Throughout recent years, researchers have made a significant contribution to understanding the pathogenesis of EoE, genetic background, natural history, work on allergy, and standardization in the evaluation of disease activity. There is relatively high prevalence of EoE among the population, emphasizing the importance of this disease. Key messages: Esophageal involvement with eosinophils may be manifested as isolated or with coexisting conditions and should be taken into consideration in the differential diagnosis. This study aimed to provide gastroenterologists with novel insights into the evaluation of esophageal involvement with eosinophils and to pay special attention to the etiological factors, coexisting clinical diseases, and complications.

Evaluation of long-term course in children with eosinophilic esophagitis reveals distinct histologic patterns and clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and increasingly prevalent antigen-driven disease. There is a paucity of information on long-term course in children.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand the longitudinal trajectory of pediatric EoE during routine clinical care.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled children into an EoE database and reviewed their medical and pathologic records over 13 years.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2015, 146 children with EoE seen for their first visit at our center had 2 or more years of follow-up and 3 or more endoscopies over an average follow-up period of 5.13 years (range, 2-13 years). Longitudinal eosinophilic inflammation during treatment demonstrated 3 patterns over time. Children with less than 15 eosinophils/high-power field (hpf) for greater than 75% of their follow-up period were termed continuous responders (CRs). Children with waxing and waning inflammation of less than 15 eosinophils/hpf for less than 75% but 25% or more of the follow-up period were termed intermittent responders (IRs). Nonresponders (NRs) were defined as having less than 15 eosinophils/hpf for less than 25% of their follow-up. Fifty-nine (40%) of 146 patients were CRs, 65 (45%) of 146 were IRs, and 22 (15%) of 146 were NRs. CRs differed from IRs and NRs on the parameter of male/female ratio (1:1 in CRs, 4:1 in IRs, and 6:1 in NRs; P < .001) and in their initial response to any therapy, including proton pump inhibitors (P < .001). Endoscopic severity correlated with esophageal eosinophilia (r = 0.73, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, female sex and initial therapeutic response to medications or elimination diet were associated with long-term control of esophageal eosinophilia.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term pediatric EoE followed 3 different longitudinal trajectories of inflammation. The long-term histologic groups differed significantly in biological sex and initial therapeutic response.

The New Paradigms in Clinical Research: From Early Access Programs to the Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Unmet Medical Needs

Despite several innovative medicines gaining worldwide approval in recent years, there are still therapeutic areas for which unsatisfied therapeutic needs persist. For example, high unmet clinical need was observed in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hemophilia, as well as in specific age groups, such as the pediatric population. Given the urgent need to improve the therapy of clinical conditions for which unmet clinical need is established, clinical testing, and approval of new medicines are increasingly being carried out through accelerated authorization procedures. Starting from 1992, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have supported the so-called Early Access Programs (EAPs). Such procedures, which can be based on incomplete clinical data, allow an accelerated marketing authorization for innovative medicines. The growth in pharmaceutical research has also resulted in the development of novel therapeutic approaches, such as biotech drugs and advanced therapy medicinal products, including new monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of asthma, antisense oligonucleotides for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy, and new anticancer drugs that act on genetic biomarkers rather than any specific type of cancer. Even though EAPs and novel therapeutic approaches have brought huge benefits for public health, their implementation is limited by several challenges, including the high risk of safety-related label changes for medicines authorized through the accelerated procedure, the high costs, and the reimbursement and access concerns. In this context, regulatory agencies should provide the best conditions for the implementation of the described new tools.

New developments in patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases presented at the CEGIR/TIGERS Symposium at the 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Meeting

The Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases and the International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers organized a day-long symposium at the recent 2018 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, which was coupled for the first time with the World Allergy Organization meeting to create an international platform. The symposium featured experts in many facets of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, including allergy, immunology, gastroenterology, pathology, and nutrition, and was a well-attended event. The basic science, genetics, cellular immunology, and clinical features of the diseases, with a focus on epithelial, eosinophil, and mast cell responses, as well as current and emerging treatment options, were reviewed. Here we briefly review some of the highlights of the material presented at the meeting.

Systematic review of histological remission criteria in eosinophilic esophagitis

Elemental diets, dietary elimination, and steroid therapies are the most common therapies in the clinical trials for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Histological findings (usually reported as eosinophils per microscopic high‐powered field [hpf]) remain the most common end‐point used to define response. Yet, the threshold for defining “response” and “remission” are ill‐defined among consensus guidelines and may vary from study to study. We conducted a systematic literature review of articles on eosinophilic esophagitis, published between January 2007 and November 2017, considering histological remission as the primary outcome. We abstracted treatment information and definitions of histological remission or response. A comparison of definitions of histological remission across and within institutions was performed. A total of 61 articles were included in this review, with approximately 60% of the studies published from centers in the United States. Histological definitions of remission of EoE ranged from 0 to ≤20 eosinophils/hpf. The most stringent criteria, ranging from 0 to ≤5 eosinophils/hpf, were commonly used in interventional trial studies that examined the effects of new treatments. We found remarkable variability in definitions between studies, treatment types, and regions. Age or epidemiological distribution of study subjects did not influence the criteria for histological remission. Clinical and histological improvements are important measures of the effects of treatment. Histological findings, the most objective measure of treatment, should provide an optimal method for comparing the effectiveness of various treatments. Yet, our findings suggest a lack of consistent remission criteria in published studies. Considering these inconsistencies, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of various treatments.

Alignment of parent- and child-reported outcomes and histology in eosinophilic esophagitis across multiple CEGIR sites

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome metrics for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have been developed and validated but not used in a multicenter pediatric population or systematically aligned with histology.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand (1) the potential of caregiver report to predict patient self-reported symptoms and (2) the correlation of patient-reported outcome domains with histology.

METHODS

Patients with EoE (n = 310) and their parents participating in the Consortium of Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Disease Researchers (CEGIR) observational clinical trial were queried for baseline patient symptoms and quality of life (QOL) by using the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score, version 2 (PEESSv2.0), and the Pediatric QOL EoE module (PedsQL-EoE), and biopsy specimens were analyzed by using the EoE Histology Scoring System.

RESULTS

PEESSv2.0 parental and child reports aligned across all domains (r = 0.68-0.73, P < .001). PedsQL-EoE reports correlated between parents and children across ages and multiple domains (r = 0.48-0.79, P < .001). There was a tight correlation between symptoms on PEESSv2.0 and their effects on QOL both on self-report and parental report (P < .001). Self-reported symptoms on PEESSv2.0 (positively) and PedsQL-EoE (inversely) showed a weak correlation with proximal, but not distal, peak eosinophil counts and features and architectural tissue changes on the EoE Histology Scoring System (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of children with EoE aged 3 to 18 years accurately reflected their children's disease symptoms and QOL. Self- and parent-reported symptoms correlate with proximal esophageal histology. Our data suggest that parental report in young children can function as an adequate marker for self-reported symptoms and that self-reported symptoms can reflect changes in tissue histology in the proximal esophagus. These findings should be considered during clinical trials for drug development.

Pathophysiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an emerging disease that is distinguished from gastroesophageal reflux disease by the expression of a unique esophageal transcriptome and the interplay of early life environmental factors with distinct genetic susceptibility elements at 5q22 (TSLP) and 2p23 (CAPN14). Rare genetic syndromes have uncovered the contribution of barrier disruption, mediated in part by defective desmosomes and dysregulated transforming growth factor beta production and signaling, to eosinophilic esophagitis pathophysiology. Experimental modeling has defined a cooperative role of activated eosinophils, mast cells, and the cytokines IL-5 and IL-13, mediated by allergic sensitization to multiple foods. Understanding these processes is opening the way to better treatment based on disrupting allergic inflammatory and type 2 cytokine-mediated responses, including anti-cytokine therapeutics and dietary therapy.

Pharmacological treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, in the absence of other known causes of eosinophilia.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical management of EGIDs is challenging, as there are currently limited therapeutic options available. The most common EGID is eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and rarer forms are eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and eosinophilic colitis. Clinical presentation depends on the affected GI site. Recently duodenal eosinophilia has been recognized to commonly be present in patients with functional dyspepsia. This review will provide an overview of the pathogenesis and therapeutic management of EGIDs, with particular focus on the pharmacological strategies for these conditions. Expert commentary: Despite the considerable progress made in understanding the pathogenesis of EGIDs, there is still an urgent need for the development of specific and effective therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic management protocols are required that are based on rigorous clinical investigation in large prospective controlled trials to better understand the risks, benefits and limitations of each therapy. More well-defined and consistent end-points are also required to assess treatment outcomes, as there has been variability between patient reported outcomes, clinical outcomes, and histological outcomes in the studies to date.

Ultrathin unsedated transnasal gastroscopy in monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Ultrathin unsedated transnasal gastroscopy (UTEG) has a number of advantages applicable to eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and has not been evaluated for this condition.

AIM

The aim of the study is to determine the feasibility of UTEG in patients with EoE and the acceptability of histological specimens obtained at biopsy.

METHOD

All patients with a diagnosis of EoE presenting to the outpatients department of two hospitals (Box Hill Hospital and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne Australia) were asked to participate in the study. UTEG was performed on consenting individuals. Feasibility was determined by the success of nasal intubaton, patient perception according to post procedural survey, and adequacy of esophageal biopsies was assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six consecutive patients with EoE were offered UTEG, and 24 agreed to participate in the study. Seventy-four UTEGs were performed over a period of 26 months (September 2012 to December 2014). Nineteen patients had repeat procedures. Successful nasal intubation occurred in 97% (72 of 74 procedures), and 21 of 24 (86%) described high satisfaction with the procedure and minimal discomfort, and would choose UTEG for future procedures. Mean duration was 5 min. Adverse events of epistaxis (three cases) and vomiting of liquid contents during the procedure (two cases) were recorded, cardiorespiratory parameters remaining normal in all patients. All completed procedures produced adequate histological samples.

CONCLUSION

In those who decide to undergo UTEG, it is a safe and well-tolerated procedure.