Factors Influencing the Outcome of Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary (HNCUP)

Background: This study on patients with head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) assesses the impact of surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities and the tumour biology on the oncological outcome. Methods: A total of 80 patients with HNCUP (UICC I−IV) were treated with simultaneous neck dissection followed by adjuvant therapy, between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2020. As the primary objective, the influence of treatment modalities on the overall survival (OS), the disease-specific survival (DSS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) were analysed in terms of cox regression and recursive partitioning. The tumour biology served as secondary objectives. Results: The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 67.7%, (95% CI: 54.2−81.2%), the 5-year DSS was 82.3% (72.1−92.5%) and the 5-year PFS was 72.8% (61.8−83.8%). Cox regression revealed that patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy only had a four times higher risk to die compared to patients receiving chemoradiation therapy (HR = 4.45 (1.40; 14.17), p = 0.012). The development of distant metastases had a significantly negative impact on OS (HR = 8.24 (3.21−21.15), p < 0.001) and DSS (HR = 23.79 (6.32−89.56), p < 0.001). Recursive portioning underlined the negative influence of distant metastases on OS (3.2-fold increase in death probability) and DSS (4.3-fold increase in death probability), while an UICC stage of IVb increased the risk for further progression of the disease by a factor of 2. Conclusions: The presence of distant metastases as well as adjuvant treatment with radiation without concomitant chemotherapy, were among others, significant predictors for the overall survival of HNCUP patients, with distant metastases being the most significant predictor.

Nomogram-Based Prediction of Overall and Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Postoperative Major Salivary Gland Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background : The major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma is a rare head and neck tumor, often accompanied by lymph node metastasis. Even if the patient undergoes surgery, the prognosis remains unsatisfactory. To explore the prognostic factors of postoperative major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma to establish a prognostic risk stratification model to guide clinical practice. Methods: Patients’ information was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2018. Optimal cutoff points were determined using X-tile software, and overall survival and disease-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors affecting the overall survival and disease-specific survival were identified by multivariate analysis, and corresponding 2 nomogram models were constructed. The discriminative ability and calibration of nomograms were evaluated by the Concordance index, area under curves, and calibration plots. Results: A total of 815 patients with postoperative major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. The cutoff values for the number of lymph nodes were 2, and the cutoff values for the lymph node ratio were 0.11 and 0.5, respectively. Age, T stage, tumor size, lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and radiotherapy were prognostic factors for overall survival and disease-specific survival. Nomograms for disease-specific survival and overall survival were established and showed favorable performance with a higher Concordance index and area under curves than that of the tumor–node–metastasis stage and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stage. The calibration plots of 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival also exhibited good consistency. What's more, patients were divided into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups according to the scores calculated by the models. The overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients in the high-risk group were significantly worse than those in the moderate- and low-risk group. Conclusions: Our nomogram integrated clinicopathological features and treatment modality to demonstrate excellent performance in risk stratification and prediction of survival outcomes in patients with major salivary gland squamous cell carcinoma after surgery, with important clinical value.

Prognostic capacity of the lymph node ratio in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Lymph node density or lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the quotient between the total number of positive lymph nodes and the total number of dissected lymph nodes, has demonstrated a prognostic capacity in several tumour models, including patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). The aim of the present study is to analyse the prognostic value of LNR in a wide cohort of patients with HNSCC.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of a cohort of 1,311 patients with HNSCC treated with unilateral or bilateral neck dissections. Of the patients included in the study, 55.0% had lymph node metastases (pN+). We proceeded to calculate the value of the LNR, and its categorization through a recursive partition analysis considering specific survival as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

Three categories were defined according to the value of the LNR with a cut-off point at the values < of .025 and .118. The 5-year specific survival for patients with an LNR less than .025 (n=654, 49.8%) was 87.2%, for patients with a LNR .025-.118 (n=394, 30.1%) it was 51.6%, and for patients with a LNR greater than .188 (n=263, 20.1%) it was 27.3% (P=.0001). According to the results of a multivariate analysis, the LNR significantly related to specific survival.

CONCLUSION

The LNR can be a prognostic variable to be considered in the pathological staging of the lymph nodes.

Patterns of Failure After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Implication of Elective Nodal and Mucosal Dose Coverage

Purpose

We evaluated the geometric and dosimetric-based distribution of mucosal and nodal recurrences in patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to cervical lymph nodes of unknown primary after intensity modulated radiation therapy using validated typology-indicative taxonomy.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the data of 260 patients who were irradiated between 2000 and 2015 and had a median follow-up time for surviving patients of 61 months. The mucosal and nodal recurrences were manually delineated on computed tomography images demonstrating the recurrences. The images were overlaid on the treatment plan using deformable image registration. The locations of the recurrences were determined relative to the original planning target volumes and doses using centroid-based approaches. Subsequently, the pattern of failures were classified into 5 types based on combined spatial and dosimetric criteria: A (central high dose), B (peripheral high dose), C (central elective dose), D (peripheral elective dose), and E (extraneous dose). For patients with type A failure with simultaneous nontype A lesions, the overall pattern of failures was defined as type A.

Results

Thirty-two patients had mucosal or nodal recurrences. The most common clinical nodal stage was N2b (66%). Preradiation therapy neck dissections were performed in 6 patients. The median dose delivered to clinical tumor volume 1 was 66 Gy. The majority (84%) had total/partial pharyngeal mucosa elective irradiation. Twenty-three patients had nodal recurrences, 8 had mucosal recurrences, and 1 had both nodal and mucosal recurrences. Twenty-one patients (91%) had type A nodal failure, and 7 of the mucosal failures (89%) were type C.

Conclusions

The majority of nodal recurrences occurred within the high-dose area, demanding the need for identification of radioresistant areas within malignant nodes. Future studies should focus on either dose escalation of high-risk volumes or novel radiosensitizers.

Diagnosis and Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on the diagnosis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUP).

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, radiology, pathology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2008 through 2019. Outcomes of interest included survival, local and regional disease control, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 100 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Four main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate pathology techniques, and adjuvant therapy.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address preoperative evaluation for patients with a neck mass, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate treatment options in unilateral versus bilateral SCCUP.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Predictors of survival and recurrence after primary surgery for cervical metastasis of unknown primary

PURPOSE

Cervical metastasis from unknown primary (CUP) is commonly classified as an advanced overall stage. P16 or human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in metastatic lymph nodes (LN) might be associated with a favorable survival outcome of CUP. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic values of p16 immuno-positivity in LN and other clinicopathological factors in patients with squamous cell carcinoma CUP (SCCUP).

METHODS

This study involved 83 patients who underwent therapeutic neck dissection and panendoscopic examination and biopsy for suspected CUP. P16 immunostaining and HPV typing in LN were performed in 56 patients. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, primary tumors (PT) were found in 32 (38.6%) patients, mainly (90.6%) in the oropharynx, and not found in 51 (61.4%) patients. The clinicopathological data (except for histological grade) and 5-year OS and DFS rates did not significantly differ between patients with and without PT identification (all P > 0.05). P16 positivity was associated with favorable OS and DFS outcomes in the patients with PT (P < 0.05) but not in those without PT (P > 0.1). Multivariate analyses showed that age (> 60 years) and LN ratio (≥ 0.1) were the independent predictors of OS and DFS outcomes (all P < 0.05). P16 positivity or other factors were not independent factors.

CONCLUSION

Age and LN ratio are significant risk factors of survival and recurrence after primary surgery for SCCUP. Prognostic significance of LN p16 positivity should be further studied.

Diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer with ultrasonic measurement of lymph node volume

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound (US) volume measurement of the cervical lymph nodes for diagnosing nodal metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer using a node-by-node comparison.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients with head and neck cancer from one tertiary university hospital were prospectively enrolled from 2012 to 2017. Patients with histologically proven squamous cell primary tumors in the head and neck region scheduled to undergo a therapeutic neck dissection were eligible. For each patient, 1-4 target lymph nodes were selected from the planned neck dissection levels. Lymph nodes with thickness >20 mm or in a cluster were excluded. Node-by-node comparisons between the pre-operative US assessment, the post-operative actual measurements and histopathological results were performed for all target lymph nodes. Quantitative measurements, such as three diameters, ratios of the three diameters and volume were analyzed in this study. Lymph node volume was calculated using the ellipsoid formula.

RESULTS

Patients comprised 28 men and 6 women with a mean age of 60.0 years (range, 29-80 years) at the time of surgery. In total, 67 target lymph nodes were analyzed in this study and the thickness ranged from 3.9 to 20.0 mm (mean 8.0 mm). There was a strong correlation between the US volume and post-operative actual volume (ρ = 0.87, p < 0.01). The US volume measured 2156 ± 2156 mm³ for the tumor positive nodes, which was significantly greater than the US volume of 512 ± 315 mm³ for tumor negative nodes (p < 0.01). Significant differences between tumor positive and tumor negative nodes were found in five variables (volume, thickness, major axis, minor axis and ratio of minor axis to thickness) for total lymph nodes. To identify predictors of lymph node metastasis, ROC curves of the US variables of target lymph nodes were compared, of which 4 variables were considered acceptable for predicting the lymph node metastasis: volume (AUC 0.86), thickness (AUC 0.86), major axis (AUC 0.79), and minor axis (AUC 0.79) for total lymph nodes. The optimal cut-off level for US volume in total lymph nodes was found to be 1242 mm³, whereby a 62% sensitivity and 98% specificity was reached (likelihood ratio: 25.2).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative ultrasonic volume measurement of the cervical lymph nodes was useful for early detection of cervical nodal metastasis in head and neck cancer.

Human papillomavirus and p16 immunostaining, prevalence and prognosis of squamous carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck region

The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck (SCCUPHN), and prognosis by HPV status of SCCUPHN patients has been difficult to estimate because of the rarity of this subtype. In MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science searches, observational studies and clinical trials that reported survival rates of patients with SCCUPHN by HPV status were identified. Meta-analysis estimated the prevalence and prognosis (overall survival, OS; progression-free survival, PFS) of SCCUPHN by HPV status, and compared them to studies of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) from the same institutions and across continents. In 17 SCCUPHN studies (n = 1,149) and 17 institution-matched OPSCC studies (n = 6,522), the pooled HPV prevalence of SCCUPHN was 49%, which was only 10% (95%CI: 1-19%) lower than OPSCC prevalence in the underlying population. Estimated 5-year OS for HPV-negative SCCUPHN was 44% (95%CI: 36-51%) vs. HPV-positive SCCUPHN of 91% (95%CI: 86-96%); hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 3.25 (95%CI: 2.45-4.31) and PFS was 4.49 (95%CI: 2.88-7.02). HRs by HPV status for OPSCC were similar to that in SCCUPHN. While North American SCCUPHNs had higher HPV prevalence than European SCCUPHNs (OR = 2.68 (95%CI: 1.3-5.6)), HR of OS for HPV-negative vs. HPV-positive patients were similar in both continents (HRs of 3.78-4.09). Prevalence of HPV among SCCUPHN patients were lower than in OPSCC. The survival benefit conferred by being HPV-positive was similar in SCCUPHN as in OPSCCs, independent of continent.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) is increasingly reported as a potential prognostic tool. The purpose of this review was to analyze the available literature on the prognostic significance of LNR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A PubMed internet search was performed and articles meeting selection criteria were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were identified in the literature dealing with the prognostic value of LNR. The published results are variable with a range of cutoff values of LNR associated with prognosis (overall survival [OS] and/or disease-specific survival [DSS]) between 0.02 and 0.20, with an average of 0.09.

CONCLUSION

The LNR is reported to be of value in assessing prognosis in the patients with HNSCC. Although it is easy to calculate and could be considered in the staging of these patients, the currently available evidence in the literature does not yet provide a solid base for implementation.

Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary tumor metastatic to neck nodes: role of elective irradiation

In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) metastases to neck lymph nodes and unknown primary tumor, the role of elective irradiation of uninvolved neck and potential mucosal primary sites is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to review the experience treating SCC of unknown primary metastatic to neck nodes with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in Slovenia between 1995 and 2010 and to determine the importance of the extent of irradiated volume. For this purpose, the nationwide Cancer Registry of Slovenia database was used for identifying patients. 126 patients were identified. Involved-field PORT and extended-field PORT was used in 50 and 76 patients, respectively. At 5 years, locoregional control was 86 %, disease-specific survival 77 %, and overall survival 57 %. In multivariate analysis, the extent of irradiated volume has not been predictive for any outcome under study. Grade ≥3 acute and late radiotherapy-induced toxicities were more frequent in the extended-field PORT group. In conclusion, although not superior, involved-field PORT seems to be a preferred treatment option in SCC of unknown primary metastatic to neck nodes due to significantly reduced toxicity and better prospects for successful salvage.

Resection and reconstruction of giant cervical metastatic cancer using a pectoralis major muscular flap transfer: A prospective study of 16 patients

If not promptly or properly treated, certain cervical metastatic cancers that develop from unknown primary tumors may rapidly grow into giant tumors that can invade the blood vessels, muscle and skin. The present study examined the feasibility and efficacy of radical neck dissection combined with reconstruction using the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for the treatment of giant cervical metastatic cancers that have developed from unknown primary tumors and have invaded the skin. A total of 16 patients who met the inclusion criteria were subjected to radical neck dissection to adequately resect invaded skin, and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap was used to repair the large skin defect created in the cervical region. Following the surgery, the patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap survived in all 16 patients, with no cases of flap necrosis. In addition, no post-operative lymphedema, paresthesia or dysfunction of an upper extremity occurred due to the cutting of a pectoralis major muscle. In 9 cases, patients were satisfied with their post-operative shoulder movement at the donor site; in the remaining 7 cases, patients felt greater weakness in this region following surgery relative to prior to surgery. The 14 male patients were generally satisfied with the post-operative appearance of the donor region, whereas the 2 female patients were dissatisfied with the appearance of this region. Follow-up for 6-53 months after the patients were discharged following surgery and chemotherapy revealed that the recurrence of cervical tumors in 6 cases. Overall, radical neck dissection combined with the use of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstruction is a feasible approach for the treatment of giant cervical metastatic cancers that have developed from unknown primary tumors and have invaded the skin. Post-operative concurrent chemoradiotherapy should be administered to improve the local control rate and patient quality of life, allowing a satisfactory therapeutic efficacy to be achieved.