1
|
Jhamb M, Weltman MR, Devaraj SM, Lavenburg LMU, Han Z, Alghwiri AA, Fischer GS, Rollman BL, Nolin TD, Yabes JG. Electronic Health Record Population Health Management for Chronic Kidney Disease Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:737-747. [PMID: 38619824 PMCID: PMC11019443 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Importance Large gaps in clinical care in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) lead to poor outcomes. Objective To compare the effectiveness of an electronic health record-based population health management intervention vs usual care for reducing CKD progression and improving evidence-based care in high-risk CKD. Design, Setting, and Participants The Kidney Coordinated Health Management Partnership (Kidney CHAMP) was a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial conducted between May 2019 and July 2022 in 101 primary care practices in Western Pennsylvania. It included patients aged 18 to 85 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 with high risk of CKD progression and no outpatient nephrology encounter within the previous 12 months. Interventions Multifaceted intervention for CKD comanagement with primary care clinicians included a nephrology electronic consultation, pharmacist-led medication management, and CKD education for patients. The usual care group received CKD care from primary care clinicians as usual. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to 40% or greater reduction in eGFR or end-stage kidney disease. Results Among 1596 patients (754 intervention [47.2%]; 842 control [52.8%]) with a mean (SD) age of 74 (9) years, 928 (58%) were female, 127 (8%) were Black, 9 (0.6%) were Hispanic, and the mean (SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 36.8 (7.9) mL/min/1.73m2. Over a median follow-up of 17.0 months, there was no significant difference in rate of primary outcome between the 2 arms (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.38; P = .82). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker exposure was more frequent in intervention arm compared with the control group (rate ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes of hypertension control and exposure to unsafe medications or adverse events between the arms. Several COVID-19-related issues contributed to null findings in the study. Conclusion and Relevance In this study, among patients with moderate-risk to high-risk CKD, a multifaceted electronic health record-based population health management intervention resulted in more exposure days to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers but did not reduce risk of CKD progression or hypertension control vs usual care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03832595.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Jhamb
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Melanie R. Weltman
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan M. Devaraj
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Linda-Marie Ustaris Lavenburg
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhuoheng Han
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alaa A. Alghwiri
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Gary S. Fischer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bruce L. Rollman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas D. Nolin
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan G. Yabes
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Center for Research on Heath Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buttafuoco KA, Mokshagundam S, Henricks A, Shore S, Brown A, Prescott LS. Impact of electronic medical record utilization on obesity screening and intervention for obese patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:830-839. [PMID: 38519088 PMCID: PMC11187359 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence of obesity documented within the electronic medical record problem list. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with obesity and endometrial cancer receiving care from January 2018 to March 2021 at a single institution. Obesity intervention was defined as receipt of at least one of the following: referral to weight loss clinic, referral to a nutritionist, completion of obesity intervention tab, or documentation of weight loss counseling. Our secondary objectives were to (1) identify the prevalence of completed obesity interventions, (2) identify the number of patients who have achieved weight loss since their initial visit, and (3) identify covariates associated with presence of obesity on problem list, completion of obesity interventions, and weight loss. RESULTS We identified 372 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of eligible patients, 202 (54%) had obesity documented on their problem list and 171 (46%) completed at least one obesity intervention. Within our cohort, 195 (52%) patients achieved weight loss from diagnosis or initial clinical encounter at our institution to most recent clinical encounter with median weight loss of 3.9 kg (IQR 1.5-8.0). In the multivariable logistic regressions, patients with obesity on the problem list were approximately twice as likely to have completion of obesity intervention (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.09, 3.35, p=0.024). Although presence of obesity on the problem list was not associated with weight loss, completion of health maintenance obesity intervention tab in the electronic medical record (Epic) was associated with weight loss (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11, 6.89, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Only half of obese endometrial cancer patients had documentation of obesity within the electronic medical record problem list. The electronic medical record could be leveraged to achieve compliance with weight loss interventions. Further investigation on how the electronic medical record can be optimized to help patients achieve weight loss is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anna Henricks
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Summer Shore
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Alaina Brown
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Lauren Shore Prescott
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams P. Retaining Race in Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Treatment. Cureus 2023; 15:e45054. [PMID: 37701164 PMCID: PMC10495104 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The best overall measure of kidney function is glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as commonly estimated from serum creatinine concentrations (eGFRcr) using formulas that correct for the higher average creatinine concentrations in Blacks. After two decades of use, these formulas have come under scrutiny for estimating GFR differently in Blacks and non-Blacks. Discussions of whether to include race (Black vs. non-Black) in the calculation of eGFRcr fail to acknowledge that the original race-based eGFRcr provided the same CKD treatment recommendations for Blacks and non-Blacks based on directly (exogenously) measured GFR. Nevertheless, the National Kidney Foundation and the American Society of Nephrology Task Force on Reassessing the Inclusion of Race in Diagnosing Kidney Disease removed race in CKD treatment guidelines and pushed for the immediate adoption of a race-free eGFRcr formula by physicians and clinical laboratories. This formula is projected to negate CKD in 5.51 million White and other non-Black adults and reclassify CKD to less severe stages in another 4.59 million non-Blacks, in order to expand treatment eligibility to 434,000 Blacks not previously diagnosed and to 584,000 Blacks previously diagnosed with less severe CKD. This review examines: 1) the validity of the arguments for removing the original race correction, and 2) the performance of the proposed replacement formula. Excluding race in the derivation of eGFRcr changed the statistical bias from +3.7 to -3.6 ml/min/1.73m2 in Blacks and from +0.5 to +3.9 in non-Blacks, i.e., promoting CKD diagnosis in Blacks at the cost of restricting diagnosis in non-Blacks. By doing so, the revised eGFRcr greatly exaggerates the purported racial disparity in CKD burden. Claims that the revised formulas identify heretofore undiagnosed CKD in Blacks are not supported when studies that used kidney failure replacement therapy and mortality are interpreted as proxies for baseline CKD. Alternatively, a race-stratified eGFRcr (i.e., separate equations for Blacks and non-Blacks) would provide the least biased eGFRcr for both Blacks and non-Blacks and the best medical treatment for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Williams
- Life Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jhamb M, Weltman MR, Yabes JG, Kamat S, Devaraj SM, Fischer GS, Rollman BL, Nolin TD, Abdel-Kader K. Electronic health record based population health management to optimize care in CKD: Design of the Kidney Coordinated HeAlth Management Partnership (K-CHAMP) trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 131:107269. [PMID: 37348600 PMCID: PMC10529809 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Primary care physicians (PCPs) provide the majority of medical care to patients with non-dialysis dependent CKD. However, PCPs report numerous limitations to providing expert CKD care, including poor patient education, inadequate diagnostic evaluation, suboptimal use of medications, and time limitations. The Kidney Coordinated HeAlth Management Partnership (Kidney CHAMP) trial is a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel centralized electronic health records (EHR)-delivered population health management (PHM) strategy for high-risk CKD patients on patient care, safety, and other outcomes of interest to patients, providers, and payors. Over a 42-month period, the trial will compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention that combines early identification of high-risk patients, timely nephrology guidance, pharmacist-led medication management services, and CKD patient education to usual care and enroll 1650 high-risk CKD patients from 100 primary care practices. The primary outcome will be ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end stage kidney disease. Key secondary outcomes will include blood pressure, renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors use, and exposure to potentially unsafe medications. If successful, our treatment approach could improve CKD care delivery and safety, resource allocation, and adoption of evidence-based CKD guideline-concordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Jhamb
- Renal and Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
| | - Melanie R Weltman
- Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Jonathan G Yabes
- Center for Research on Heath Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Sanjana Kamat
- Renal and Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Susan M Devaraj
- Renal and Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Gary S Fischer
- Department of Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Bruce L Rollman
- Center for Research on Heath Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Thomas D Nolin
- Renal and Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Khaled Abdel-Kader
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rylee TL, Copenhaver D, Drake C, Joseph J. A Cross-Sectional Study of the Characteristics Associated With Chronic Pain Documentation on the Problem List. J Healthc Qual 2023; 45:200-208. [PMID: 37010320 DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chronic pain is often elusive because of its specific diagnosis and complex presentation, making it challenging for healthcare providers to develop safe and effective treatment plans. Experts recommend a multifaceted approach to managing chronic pain that requires interdisciplinary communication and coordination. Studies have found that patients with a complete problem list receive better follow-up care. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with chronic pain documentation in the problem list. This study included 126 clinics and 12,803 patients 18 years or older with a chronic pain diagnosis within 6 months before or during the study period. The findings revealed that 46.4% of the participants were older than 60 years, 68.3% were female, and 52.1% had chronic pain documented on their problem list. Chi-square tests revealed significant differences in demographics between those who did and did not have chronic pain documented on their problem list, with 55.2% of individuals younger than 60 years having chronic pain documented on their problem list, 55.0% of female patients, 60.3% of Black non-Hispanic people, and 64.8% of migraine sufferers. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, sex, race/ethnicity, diagnosis type, and opioid prescriptions were significant predictors of chronic pain documentation on the problem list.
Collapse
|
6
|
Oliva-Damaso N, Delanaye P, Oliva-Damaso E, Payan J, Glassock RJ. Risk-based versus GFR threshold criteria for nephrology referral in chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 2022; 15:1996-2005. [PMID: 36325015 PMCID: PMC9613424 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure are global health problems associated with morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs, with unequal access to kidney replacement therapy between countries. The diversity of guidelines concerning referral from primary care to a specialist nephrologist determines different outcomes around the world among patients with CKD where several guidelines recommend referral when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 regardless of age. Additionally, fixed non-age-adapted diagnostic criteria for CKD that do not distinguish correctly between normal kidney senescence and true kidney disease can lead to overdiagnosis of CKD in the elderly and underdiagnosis of CKD in young patients and contributes to the unfair referral of CKD patients to a kidney specialist. Non-age-adapted recommendations contribute to unnecessary referral in the very elderly with a mild disease where the risk of death consistently exceeds the risk of progression to kidney failure and ignore the possibility of effective interventions of a young patient with long life expectancy. The opportunity of mitigating CKD progression and cardiovascular complications in young patients with early stages of CKD is a task entrusted to primary care providers who are possibly unable to optimally accomplish guideline-directed medical therapy for this purpose. The shortage in the nephrology workforce has classically led to focused referral on advanced CKD stages preparing for kidney replacement, but the need for hasty referral to a nephrologist because of the urgent requirement for kidney replacement therapy in advanced CKD is still observed and changes are required to move toward reducing the kidney failure burden. The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) is a novel tool that can guide wiser nephrology referrals and impact patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nestor Oliva-Damaso
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Malaga, Spain
| | - Pierre Delanaye
- Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, University of Liege, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman, ULgCHU, Liege, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Apheresis, Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Elena Oliva-Damaso
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Doctor Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Juan Payan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Malaga, Spain
| | - Richard J Glassock
- Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heintzman J, Kaufmann J, Bailey S, Lucas J, Suglia SF, Puro J, Giebultowicz S, Ezekiel-Herrera D, Marino M. Asthma Ambulatory Care Quality in Foreign-Born Latino Children in the United States. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22:647-656. [PMID: 34688905 PMCID: PMC10602714 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Foreign-born Latino children in the United States (US) have poor asthma outcomes, but the role of routine care utilization in these outcomes is unclear. Our objective was to compare select ambulatory care utilization measures for asthma between foreign-born Latino, US-born Latino, and non-Hispanic white children. METHODS Using a multistate network of clinics with a linked electronic health record, we compared the International Classification of Disease (ICD)-coded asthma diagnosis among those with respiratory symptoms, electronic health records documentation of diagnosis, prescriptions, and influenza vaccination of foreign-born and US-born Latino children, and non-Hispanic white children over a 10+ year study period. We also examined outcomes by country of birth in children from Mexico, Cuba, and Guatemala. RESULTS Among our study population (n = 155,902), 134,570 were non-Hispanic white, 19,143 were US-born Latino, and 2189 were foreign-born Latino. Among those with suspicious respiratory symptoms, there was no difference between these groups in the predicted probability of an ICD-coded asthma diagnosis. US-born Latino children with asthma were less likely to have asthma documented on their problem list, more likely to have an albuterol prescription, and less likely to have an inhaled steroid prescribed. All Latino children had higher rates of influenza vaccination than non-Hispanic white children. CONCLUSIONS In a national network, there were few disparities between Latino (US- and foreign-born) children and non-Hispanic white comparators in many common asthma care services, except some measures in US-born Latino children. Providers should understand that their US-born Latino children may be at elevated risk for not receiving adequate asthma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Heintzman
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore; OCHIN Inc. (J Heintzman, J Puro, and S Giebultowicz), Portland, Ore.
| | - Jorge Kaufmann
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore
| | - Steffani Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore
| | - Jennifer Lucas
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore
| | - Shakira F Suglia
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health (SF Suglia), Atlanta, Ga
| | - Jon Puro
- OCHIN Inc. (J Heintzman, J Puro, and S Giebultowicz), Portland, Ore
| | | | - David Ezekiel-Herrera
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore
| | - Miguel Marino
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University (J Heintzman, J Kaufmann, S Bailey, J Lucas, and D Ezekiel-Herrera), Portland, Ore; Biostatistics Group, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health (M Marino), Portland, Ore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chu CD, Powe NR, McCulloch CE, Crews DC, Han Y, Bragg-Gresham JL, Saran R, Koyama A, Burrows NR, Tuot DS. Trends in Chronic Kidney Disease Care in the US by Race and Ethnicity, 2012-2019. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2127014. [PMID: 34570204 PMCID: PMC8477264 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Significant racial and ethnic disparities in chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and outcomes are well documented, as is low use of guideline-recommended CKD care. Objective To examine guideline-recommended CKD care delivery by race and ethnicity in a large, diverse population. Design, Setting, and Participants In this serial cross-sectional study, adult patients with CKD that did not require dialysis, defined as a persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or a urine albumin-creatinine ratio of 30 mg/g or higher for at least 90 days, were identified in 2-year cross-sections from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. Data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a national data set of administrative and electronic health record data for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients, were used. Exposures The independent variables were race and ethnicity, as reported in linked electronic health records. Main Outcomes and Measures On the basis of guideline-recommended CKD care, the study examined care delivery process measures (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker prescription for albuminuria, statin prescription, albuminuria testing, nephrology care for CKD stage 4 or higher, and avoidance of chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription) and care delivery outcome measures (blood pressure and diabetes control). Results A total of 452 238 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 74.0 [10.2] years; 262 089 [58.0%] female; a total of 7573 [1.7%] Asian, 49 970 [11.0%] Black, 15 540 [3.4%] Hispanic, and 379 155 [83.8%] White). Performance on process measures was higher among Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients compared with White patients for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker use (79.8% for Asian patients, 76.7% for Black patients, and 79.9% for Hispanic patients compared with 72.3% for White patients in 2018-2019), statin use (72.6% for Asian patients, 69.1% for Black patients, and 74.1% for Hispanic patients compared with 61.5% for White patients), nephrology care (64.8% for Asian patients, 72.9% for Black patients, and 69.4% for Hispanic patients compared with 58.3% for White patients), and albuminuria testing (53.9% for Asian patients, 41.0% for Black patients, and 52.6% for Hispanic patients compared with 30.7% for White patients). Achievement of blood pressure control to less than 140/90 mm Hg was similar or lower among Asian (71.8%), Black (63.3%), and Hispanic (69.8%) patients compared with White patients (72.9%). Achievement of diabetes control with hemoglobin A1c less than 7.0% was 50.1% in Asian patients, 49.3% in Black patients, and 46.0% in Hispanic patients compared with 50.3% for White patients. Conclusions and Relevance Higher performance on CKD care process measures among Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients suggests that differences in medication prescription and diagnostic testing are unlikely to fully explain known disparities in CKD progression and kidney failure. Improving care delivery processes alone may be inadequate for reducing these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi D. Chu
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco
- OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, Minnesota
| | - Neil R. Powe
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Medicine, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Charles E. McCulloch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Deidra C. Crews
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Johns Hopkins Center for Health Equity, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yun Han
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Rajiv Saran
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Alain Koyama
- Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nilka R. Burrows
- Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Delphine S. Tuot
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Medicine, Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lucas JA, Marino M, Fankhauser K, Bazemore A, Giebultowicz S, Cowburn S, Kaufmann J, Ezekiel-Herrera D, Heintzman J. Role of social deprivation on asthma care quality among a cohort of children in US community health centres. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045131. [PMID: 34162640 PMCID: PMC8230996 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Social deprivation is associated with worse asthma outcomes. The Social Deprivation Index is a composite measure of social determinants of health used to identify neighbourhood-level disadvantage in healthcare. Our objective was to determine if higher neighbourhood-level social deprivation is associated with documented asthma care quality measures among children treated at community health centres (CHCs). METHODS SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, OUTCOME MEASURES We used data from CHCs in 15 states in the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network (ADVANCE). The sample included 34 266 children with asthma from 2008 to 2017, aged 3-17 living in neighbourhoods with differing levels of social deprivation measured using quartiles of the Social Deprivation Index score. We conducted logistic regression to examine the odds of problem list documentation of asthma and asthma severity, and negative binomial regression for rates of albuterol, inhaled steroid and oral steroid prescription adjusted for patient-level covariates. RESULTS Children from the most deprived neighbourhoods had increased rates of albuterol (rate ratio (RR)=1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32) compared with those in the least deprived neighbourhoods, while the point estimate for inhaled steroids was higher, but fell just short of significance at the alpha=0.05 level (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.34). We did not observe community-level differences in problem list documentation of asthma or asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS Higher neighbourhood-level social deprivation was associated with more albuterol and inhaled steroid prescriptions among children with asthma, while problem list documentation of asthma and asthma severity varied little across neighbourhoods with differing deprivation scores. While the homogeneity of the CHC safety net setting studied may mitigate variation in diagnosis and documentation of asthma, enhanced clinician awareness of differences in community risk could help target paediatric patients at risk of lower quality asthma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Lucas
- Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Miguel Marino
- Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katie Fankhauser
- Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jorge Kaufmann
- Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - John Heintzman
- Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- OCHIN, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Datar M, Ramakrishnan S, Montgomery E, Coca SG, Vassalotti JA, Goss T. A qualitative study documenting unmet needs in the management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in the primary care setting. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:930. [PMID: 34001084 PMCID: PMC8127260 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10959-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A majority of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) patients receive medical care in the primary care setting, making it an important opportunity to improve patient management. There is limited evidence evaluating whether primary care physicians (PCPs) are equipped to effectively manage these patients in routine clinical practice. The present study was undertaken to identify gaps in primary care and unmet needs in the diagnosis and monitoring of DKD in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients among PCPs. METHODS This was a qualitative analysis based on 30-45-min interviews with PCPs treating T2D patients. PCPs were recruited via email and were board-certified, in practice for more than 3 years, spent most of their time in direct clinical care, and provided care for more than three T2D patients in a week. Descriptive data analysis was conducted to identify and examine themes that were generated by interviews. Two reviewers evaluated interview data to identify themes and developed consensus on the priority themes identified. RESULTS A total of 16 PCPs satisfying the inclusion criteria were recruited for qualitative interviews. Although the PCPs recognized kidney disease as an important comorbidity in T2D patients, testing for kidney disease was not consistently top of mind, with 56% reportedly performing kidney function testing in their T2D patients. PCPs most frequently reported using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) alone to monitor and stage DKD; only 25% PCPs reported testing for albuminuria. Most PCPs incorrectly believed that a majority of DKD patients are diagnosed in early stages. Also, early stages of DKD emerged as ambiguous areas of decision-making, wherein treatments prescribed greatly varied among PCPs. Lastly, early and accurate risk stratification of DKD patients emerged as the most important unmet need; which, if it could be overcome, was consistently identified by PCPs as a key to monitoring, appropriate nephrologist referrals, and intervening to improve outcomes in patients with DKD. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights important unmet needs in T2D DKD testing, staging, and stratification in the PCP setting that limit effective patient care. Health systems and insurers in the U.S. should prioritize the review and approval of new strategies that can improve DKD staging and risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Steven G Coca
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph A Vassalotti
- National Kidney Foundation, Inc., New York, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Goss
- Boston Healthcare Associates, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naranjo FS, Sang Y, Ballew SH, Stempniewicz N, Dunning SC, Levey AS, Coresh J, Grams ME. Estimating Kidney Failure Risk Using Electronic Medical Records. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:415-424. [PMID: 35369014 PMCID: PMC8786004 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0005592020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background The four-variable kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) is a well-validated tool for patients with GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and incorporates age, sex, GFR, and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) to forecast individual risk of kidney failure. Implementing the KFRE in electronic medical records is challenging, however, due to low ACR testing in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine, when ACR is missing, whether to impute ACR from protein-to-creatinine ratio (PCR) or dipstick protein for use in the four-variable KFRE, or to use the three-variable KFRE, which does not require ACR. Methods Using electronic health records from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, patients with eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were categorized on the basis of the availability of ACR testing within the previous 3 years. For patients missing ACR, we extracted urine PCR and dipstick protein results, comparing the discrimination of the three-variable KFRE (age, sex, GFR) with the four-variable KFRE estimated using imputed ACR from PCR and dipstick protein levels. Results There were 976,299 patients in 39 health care organizations; 59% were women, the mean age was 72 years, and mean eGFR was 47 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The proportion with ACR testing was 19% within the previous 3 years. An additional 2% had an available PCR and 36% had a dipstick protein; the remaining 43% had no form of albuminuria testing. The four-variable KFRE had significantly better discrimination than the three-variable KFRE among patients with ACR testing, PCR testing, and urine dipstick protein levels, even with imputed ACR for the latter two groups. Calibration of the four-variable KFRE was acceptable in each group, but the three-variable equation showed systematic bias in the groups that lacked ACR or PCR testing. Conclusions Implementation of the KFRE in electronic medical records should incorporate ACR, even if only imputed from PCR or urine dipstick protein levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe S. Naranjo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yingying Sang
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland,OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Shoshana H. Ballew
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Andrew S. Levey
- Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Josef Coresh
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Morgan E. Grams
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sofue T, Nakagawa N, Kanda E, Nagasu H, Matsushita K, Nangaku M, Maruyama S, Wada T, Terada Y, Yamagata K, Narita I, Yanagita M, Sugiyama H, Shigematsu T, Ito T, Tamura K, Isaka Y, Okada H, Tsuruya K, Yokoyama H, Nakashima N, Kataoka H, Ohe K, Okada M, Kashihara N. Prevalences of hyperuricemia and electrolyte abnormalities in patients with chronic kidney disease in Japan: A nationwide, cross-sectional cohort study using data from the Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Database (J-CKD-DB). PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240402. [PMID: 33057377 PMCID: PMC7561156 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Database (J-CKD-DB) is a nationwide clinical database of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on electronic health records. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalences of hyperuricemia and electrolyte abnormalities in Japanese patients with CKD. METHODS In total, 35,508 adult outpatients with estimated glomerular filtration rates of 5-60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in seven university hospitals were included this analysis. The proportions of patients with CKD stages G3b, G4, and G5 were 23.5%, 7.6%, and 3.1%, respectively. RESULTS Logistic regression analysis showed that prevalence of hyperuricemia was associated with CKD stages G3b (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.12 [1.90-2.37]), G4 (4.57 [3.92-5.32]), and G5 (2.25 [1.80-2.80]). The respective prevalences of hyponatremia, hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and narrower difference between serum sodium and chloride concentrations were elevated in patients with CKD stages G3b, G4, and G5, compared with those prevalences in patients with CKD stage G3a. The prevalences of hyperkalemia were 8.3% and 11.6% in patients with CKD stages G4 and G5, respectively. In patients with CKD stage G5, the proportions of patients with optimal ranges of serum uric acid, potassium, corrected calcium, and phosphate were 49.6%, 73.5%, 81.9%, and 56.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We determined the prevalences of hyperuricemia and electrolyte abnormalities in Japanese patients with CKD using data from a nationwide cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Sofue
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Cardiorenal and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakagawa
- Division of Cardiology, Nephrology, Respiratory and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Eiichiro Kanda
- Medical Science, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hajime Nagasu
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Matsushita
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Masaomi Nangaku
- Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Maruyama
- Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Wada
- Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yoshio Terada
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Yamagata
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ichiei Narita
- Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Motoko Yanagita
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Sugiyama
- Department of Human Resource Development of Dialysis Therapy for Kidney Disease, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Takafumi Ito
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan
| | - Kouichi Tamura
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Isaka
- Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Okada
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Tsuruya
- Department of Integrated Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yokoyama
- Department of Nephrology, Kanazawa Medical University School of Medicine, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakashima
- Medical Information Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiromi Kataoka
- Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ohe
- Department of Healthcare Information Management, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihoko Okada
- Institute of Health Data Infrastructure for All, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kashihara
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liao N, Kasick R, Allen K, Bode R, Macias C, Lee J, Ramachandran S, Erdem G. Pediatric Inpatient Problem List Review and Accuracy Improvement. Hosp Pediatr 2020; 10:941-948. [PMID: 33051244 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The problem list (PL) is a meaningful use-incentivized criterion for electronic health record documentation. Inconsistent use or inaccuracy of the PL can create communication gaps among providers, potentially leading to diagnostic delays and serious safety events. The objective of the study was to increase the rate of PL review by attending physicians for inpatients discharged from hospital pediatrics and infectious disease services from a baseline of 70% to 80% by June 2018 and to sustain the rate for 6 months. The secondary aim was to improve PL accuracy by decreasing the rate of duplicate codes and red code diagnoses that should resolve before discharge from a baseline of 12% and 11%, respectively, to 5% and sustaining the rate for 6 months. METHODS A quality improvement team used the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement. We tracked duplicate codes and red codes as surrogate markers of PL quality. Rates of PL review and PL quality were analyzed monthly via statistical process control charts (p-charts) with 3-σ control limits to identify special cause variation. RESULTS PL review improved from a baseline of 70% to 90%, and the change was sustained for 1 year. PL quality improved as duplicate codes at the time of discharge decreased from 12% to 6% and as red codes decreased from a baseline of 11% to 6%. CONCLUSIONS The PL is an important communication tool that is underused. By engaging and educating stakeholders, incentivizing compliance, standardizing PL management, leveraging electronic health record enhancements, and providing physician feedback, we improved PL meaningful use and quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Liao
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and .,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rena Kasick
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and.,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Karen Allen
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and.,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ryan Bode
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and.,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Jennifer Lee
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and
| | | | - Guliz Erdem
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and.,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Asthma Care Quality, Language, and Ethnicity in a Multi-State Network of Low-Income Children. J Am Board Fam Med 2020; 33:707-715. [PMID: 32989065 PMCID: PMC8682951 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior research has documented disparities in asthma outcomes between Latino children and non-Hispanic whites, but little research directly examines the care provided to Latino children over time in clinical settings. METHODS We utilized an electronic health record-based dataset to study basic asthma care utilization (timely diagnosis documentation and medication prescription) between Latino (Spanish preferring and English preferring) and Non-Hispanic white children over a 13-year study period. RESULTS In our study population (n = 37,614), Latino children were more likely to have Medicaid, be low income, and be obese than non-Hispanic white children. Latinos (Spanish preferring and English preferring) had lower odds than non-Hispanic whites of having their asthma recorded on their problem list on the first day the diagnosis was noted (odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.89 Spanish preferring; OR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.99 English preferring). Spanish-preferring Latinos had higher odds of ever receiving a prescription for albuterol (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.52), inhaled corticosteroids (OR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.09), or oral steroids (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.04) than non-Hispanic whites. Among those with any prescription, Spanish-preferring Latinos had higher rates of albuterol prescriptions compared with non-Hispanic whites (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.0; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS In a multi-state network of clinics, Latino children were less likely to have their asthma entered on their problem list the first day it was noted than non-Hispanic white children, but otherwise did not receive inferior care to non-Hispanic white children in other measures. Further research can examine other parts of the asthma care continuum to better understand asthma disparities.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sofue T, Nakagawa N, Kanda E, Nagasu H, Matsushita K, Nangaku M, Maruyama S, Wada T, Terada Y, Yamagata K, Narita I, Yanagita M, Sugiyama H, Shigematsu T, Ito T, Tamura K, Isaka Y, Okada H, Tsuruya K, Yokoyama H, Nakashima N, Kataoka H, Ohe K, Okada M, Kashihara N. Prevalence of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease in Japan: A nationwide, cross-sectional cohort study using data from the Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Database (J-CKD-DB). PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236132. [PMID: 32687544 PMCID: PMC7371174 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japan Chronic Kidney Disease Database (J-CKD-DB) is a nationwide clinical database of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on electronic health records. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of anemia and the utilization rate of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in Japanese patients with CKD. METHODS In total, 31,082 adult outpatients with estimated glomerular filtration rates of 5-60 ml/min/1.73 m2 in seven university hospitals were included this analysis. The proportions of patients with CKD stages G3b, G4, and G5 were 23.5%, 7.6%, and 3.1%, respectively. RESULTS The mean (standard deviation) hemoglobin level of male patients was 13.6 (1.9) g/dl, which was significantly higher than the mean hemoglobin level of female patients (12.4 (1.6) g/dl). The mean (standard deviation) hemoglobin levels were 11.4 (2.1) g/dl in patients with CKD stage G4 and 11.2 (1.8) g/dl in patients with CKD stage G5. The prevalences of anemia were 40.1% in patients with CKD stage G4 and 60.3% in patients with CKD stage G5. Logistic regression analysis showed that diagnoses of CKD stage G3b (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.32 [2.09-2.58]), G4 (5.50 [4.80-6.31]), and G5 (9.75 [8.13-11.7]) were associated with increased prevalence of anemia. The utilization rates of ESAs were 7.9% in patients with CKD stage G4 and 22.4% in patients with CKD stage G5. CONCLUSIONS We determined the prevalence of anemia and utilization rate of ESAs in Japanese patients with CKD using data from a nationwide cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Sofue
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Cardiorenal and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
- * E-mail:
| | - Naoki Nakagawa
- Division of Cardiology, Nephrology, Respiratory and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan
| | - Eiichiro Kanda
- Medical Science, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hajime Nagasu
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Matsushita
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Masaomi Nangaku
- Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Maruyama
- Division of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Wada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Nephrology and Laboratory Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yoshio Terada
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Yamagata
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ichiei Narita
- Division of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Motoko Yanagita
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Sugiyama
- Department of Human Resource Development of Dialysis Therapy for Kidney Disease, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takashi Shigematsu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Ito
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan
| | - Kouichi Tamura
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Isaka
- Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Okada
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Tsuruya
- Department of Integrated Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yokoyama
- Department of Nephrology, Kanazawa Medical University School of Medicine, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakashima
- Department of Advanced Information Technology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiromi Kataoka
- Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ohe
- Department of Healthcare Information Management, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihoko Okada
- Institute of Health Data Infrastructure for All, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kashihara
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hounkpatin HO, Fraser SDS, Honney R, Dreyer G, Brettle A, Roderick PJ. Ethnic minority disparities in progression and mortality of pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic scoping review. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:217. [PMID: 32517714 PMCID: PMC7282112 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01852-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are a growing number of studies on ethnic differences in progression and mortality for pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD), but this literature has yet to be synthesised, particularly for studies on mortality. Methods This scoping review synthesized existing literature on ethnic differences in progression and mortality for adults with pre-dialysis CKD, explored factors contributing to these differences, and identified gaps in the literature. A comprehensive search strategy using search terms for ethnicity and CKD was taken to identify potentially relevant studies. Nine databases were searched from 1992 to June 2017, with an updated search in February 2020. Results 8059 articles were identified and screened. Fifty-five studies (2 systematic review, 7 non-systematic reviews, and 46 individual studies) were included in this review. Most were US studies and compared African-American/Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian populations, and fewer studies assessed outcomes for Hispanics and Asians. Most studies reported higher risk of CKD progression in Afro-Caribbean/African-Americans, Hispanics, and Asians, lower risk of mortality for Asians, and mixed findings on risk of mortality for Afro-Caribbean/African-Americans and Hispanics, compared to Caucasians. Biological factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease contributed to increased risk of progression for ethnic minorities but did not increase risk of mortality in these groups. Conclusions Higher rates of renal replacement therapy among ethnic minorities may be partly due to increased risk of progression and reduced mortality in these groups. The review identifies gaps in the literature and highlights a need for a more structured approach by researchers that would allow higher confidence in single studies and better harmonization of data across studies to advance our understanding of CKD progression and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda O Hounkpatin
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, South Academic Block, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Room AC18 Level C, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Simon D S Fraser
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, South Academic Block, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Room AC18 Level C, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Rory Honney
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, South Academic Block, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Room AC18 Level C, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Gavin Dreyer
- Department of Nephrology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Brettle
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work and Social Sciences, University of Salford, Rm 1.47, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road, Salford, M6 6PU, UK
| | - Paul J Roderick
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, South Academic Block, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Room AC18 Level C, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Diamantidis CJ, Hale SL, Wang V, Smith VA, Scholle SH, Maciejewski ML. Lab-based and diagnosis-based chronic kidney disease recognition and staging concordance. BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:357. [PMID: 31521124 PMCID: PMC6744668 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1551-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often under-recognized and poorly documented via diagnoses, but the extent of under-recognition is not well understood among Medicare beneficiaries. The current study used claims-based diagnosis and lab data to examine patient factors associated with clinically recognized CKD and CKD stage concordance between claims- and lab-based sources in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS In a cohort of fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries with CKD based on 2011 labs, we examined the proportion with clinically recognized CKD via diagnoses and factors associated with clinical recognition in logistic regression. In the subset of beneficiaries with CKD stage identified from both labs and diagnoses, we examined concordance in CKD stage from both sources, and factors independently associated with CKD stage concordance in logistic regression. RESULTS Among the subset of 206,036 beneficiaries with lab-based CKD, only 11.8% (n = 24,286) had clinically recognized CKD via diagnoses. Clinical recognition was more likely for beneficiaries who had higher CKD stages, were non-elderly, were Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black, lived in core metropolitan areas, had multiple chronic conditions or outpatient visits in 2010, or saw a nephrologist. In the subset of 18,749 beneficiaries with CKD stage identified from both labs and diagnoses, 70.0% had concordant CKD stage, which was more likely if beneficiaries were older adults, male, lived in micropolitan areas instead of non-core areas, or saw a nephrologist. CONCLUSIONS There is significant under-diagnosis of CKD in Medicare FFS beneficiaries, which can be addressed with the availability of lab results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa J. Diamantidis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Sarah L. Hale
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Valerie A. Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | | | - Matthew L. Maciejewski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Orenstein EW, Ferro DF, Bonafide CP, Landrigan CP, Gillespie S, Muthu N. Hidden health IT hazards: a qualitative analysis of clinically meaningful documentation discrepancies at transfer out of the pediatric intensive care unit. JAMIA Open 2019; 2:392-398. [PMID: 31984372 PMCID: PMC6951953 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The risk of medical errors increases upon transfer out of the intensive care unit (ICU). Discrepancies in the documented care plan between notes at the time of transfer may contribute to communication errors. We sought to determine the frequency of clinically meaningful discrepancies in the documented care plan for patients transferred from the pediatric ICU to the medical wards and identified risk factors. Materials and Methods Two physician reviewers independently compared the transfer note and handoff document of 50 randomly selected transfers. Clinically meaningful discrepancies in the care plan between these two documents were identified using a coding procedure adapted from healthcare failure mode and effects analysis. We assessed the influence of risk factors via multivariable regression. Results We identified 34 clinically meaningful discrepancies in 50 patient transfers. Fourteen transfers (28%) had ≥1 discrepancy, and ≥2 were present in 7 transfers (14%). The most common discrepancy categories were differences in situational awareness notifications and documented current therapy. Transfers with handoff document length in the top quartile had 10.6 (95% CI: 1.2-90.2) times more predicted discrepancies than transfers with handoff length in the bottom quartile. Patients receiving more medications in the 24 hours prior to transfer had higher discrepancy counts, with each additional medication increasing the predicted number of discrepancies by 17% (95% CI: 6%-29%). Conclusion Clinically meaningful discrepancies in the documented care plan pose legitimate safety concerns and are common at the time of transfer out of the ICU among complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan W Orenstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Daria F Ferro
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher P Bonafide
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher P Landrigan
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott Gillespie
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Naveen Muthu
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smits KP, Sidorenkov G, van Ittersum FJ, Waanders F, Bilo HJ, Navis GJ, Denig P. Prescribing quality in secondary care patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025784. [PMID: 31326925 PMCID: PMC6661701 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Insight in the prescribing quality for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in secondary care is limited. The aim of this study is to assess the prescribing quality in secondary care patients with CKD stages 3-5 and possible differences in quality between CKD stages. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING Data were collected at two university (n=569 and n=845) and one non-university nephrology outpatient clinic (n=1718) in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Between March 2015 and August 2016, data were collected from patients with stages 3a-5 CKD seen at the clinics. Blood pressure measurements, laboratory measurements and prescription data were extracted from medical records. For each prescribing quality indicator, patients with incomplete data required for calculation were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES Potentially appropriate prescribing of antihypertensives, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, statins, phosphate binders and potentially inappropriate prescribing according to prevailing guidelines was assessed using prescribing quality indicators. Χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to test for differences in prescribing quality. RESULTS RAAS inhibitors alone or in combination with diuretics (57% or 52%, respectively) and statins (42%) were prescribed less often than phosphate binders (72%) or antihypertensives (94%) when indicated. Active vitamin D was relatively often prescribed when potentially not indicated (19%). Patients with high CKD stages were less likely to receive RAAS inhibitors but more likely to receive statins when indicated than stage 3 CKD patients. They also received more active vitamin D and erythropoietin-stimulating agents when potentially not indicated. CONCLUSIONS Priority areas for improvement of prescribing in CKD outpatients include potential underprescribing of RAAS inhibitors and statins, and potential overprescribing of active vitamin D. CKD stage should be taken into account when assessing prescribing quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Pj Smits
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Grigory Sidorenkov
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Waanders
- Department of Nephrology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Jg Bilo
- Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjan J Navis
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Khoong EC, Karliner L, Lo L, Stebbins M, Robinson A, Pathak S, Santoyo-Olsson J, Scherzer R, Peralta CA. A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System to Improve Chronic Kidney Disease Management in Primary Care: Design, Rationale, and Implementation Experience. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e14022. [PMID: 31199334 PMCID: PMC6594214 DOI: 10.2196/14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is based on laboratory results easily extracted from electronic health records; therefore, CKD identification and management is an ideal area for targeted electronic decision support efforts. Early CKD management frequently occurs in primary care settings where primary care providers (PCPs) may not implement all the best practices to prevent CKD-related complications. Few previous studies have employed randomized trials to assess a CKD electronic clinical decision support system (eCDSS) that provided recommendations to PCPs tailored to each patient based on laboratory results. Objective The aim of this study was to report the trial design and implementation experience of a CKD eCDSS in primary care. Methods This was a 3-arm pragmatic cluster-randomized trial at an academic general internal medicine practice. Eligible patients had 2 previous estimated-glomerular-filtration-rates by serum creatinine (eGFRCr) <60 mL/min/1.73m2 at least 90 days apart. Randomization occurred at the PCP level. For patients of PCPs in either of the 2 intervention arms, the research team ordered triple-marker testing (serum creatinine, serum cystatin-c, and urine albumin-creatinine-ratio) at the beginning of the study period, to be completed when acquiring labs for regular clinical care. The eCDSS launched for PCPs and patients in the intervention arms during a regular PCP visit subsequent to completing the triple-marker testing. The eCDSS delivered individualized guidance on cardiovascular risk-reduction, potassium and proteinuria management, and patient education. Patients in the eCDSS+ arm also received a pharmacist phone call to reinforce CKD-related education. The primary clinical outcome is blood pressure change from baseline at 6 months after the end of the trial, and the main secondary outcome is provider awareness of CKD diagnosis. We also collected process, patient-centered, and implementation outcomes. Results A multidisciplinary team (primary care internist, nephrologists, pharmacist, and informaticist) designed the eCDSS to integrate into the current clinical workflow. All 81 PCPs contacted agreed to participate and were randomized. Of 995 patients initially eligible by eGFRCr, 413 were excluded per protocol and 58 opted out or withdrew, resulting in 524 patient participants (188 usual care; 165 eCDSS; and 171 eCDSS+). During the 12-month intervention period, 53.0% (178/336) of intervention patient participants completed triple-marker labs. Among these, 138/178 (77.5%) had a PCP appointment after the triple-marker labs resulted; the eCDSS was opened for 73.9% (102/138), with orders or education signed for 81.4% (83/102). Conclusions Successful integration of an eCDSS into primary care workflows and high eCDSS utilization rates at eligible visits suggest this tailored electronic approach is feasible and has the potential to improve guideline-concordant CKD care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02925962; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02925962 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/78qpx1mjR) International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/14022
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine C Khoong
- Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Leah Karliner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lowell Lo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Marilyn Stebbins
- School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Robinson
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sarita Pathak
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Rebecca Scherzer
- Kidney Health Research Collaborative, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Carmen A Peralta
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Kidney Health Research Collaborative, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.,Cricket Health, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Frigaard M, Rubinsky A, Lowell L, Malkina A, Karliner L, Kohn M, Peralta CA. Validating laboratory defined chronic kidney disease in the electronic health record for patients in primary care. BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:3. [PMID: 30606109 PMCID: PMC6318865 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1156-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR) data is increasingly used to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). EHR queries used to capture CKD status, identify comorbid conditions, measure awareness by providers, and track adherence to guideline-concordant processes of care have not been validated. METHODS We extracted EHR data for primary-care patients with two eGFRcreat 15-59 mL/min/1.73 m^2 at least 90 days apart. Two nephrologists manually reviewed a random sample of 50 charts to determine CKD status, associated comorbidities, and physician awareness of CKD. We also assessed the documentation of a CKD diagnosis with guideline-driven care. RESULTS Complete data were available on 1767 patients with query-defined CKD of whom 822 (47%) had a CKD diagnosis in their chart. Manual chart review confirmed the CKD diagnosis in 34 or 50 (68%) patients. Agreement between the reviewers and the EHR diagnoses on the presence of comorbidities was good (κ > 0.70, p < 0.05), except for congestive heart failure, (κ = 0.45, p < 0.05). Reviewers felt the providers were aware of CKD in 23 of 34 (68%) of the confirmed CKD cases. A CKD diagnosis was associated with higher odds of guideline-driven care including CKD-specific laboratory tests and prescriptions for statins. After adjustment, CKD diagnosis documentation was not significantly associated with ACE/ARB prescription. CONCLUSIONS Identifying CKD status by historical eGFRs overestimates disease prevalence. A CKD diagnosis in the patient chart was a reasonable surrogate for provider awareness of disease status, but CKD awareness remains relatively low. CKD in the patient chart was associated with higher rates of albuminuria testing and use of statins, but not use of ACE/ARB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Frigaard
- Kidney health research collaborative (KHRC), University of California, 4150 Clement St. Building 2, Room 145, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
| | - Anna Rubinsky
- Kidney health research collaborative (KHRC), University of California, 4150 Clement St. Building 2, Room 145, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
| | - Lo Lowell
- Nephrology and Hypertension at Parnassus, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
| | - Anna Malkina
- Nephrology and Hypertension at Parnassus, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
| | - Leah Karliner
- Nephrology and Hypertension at Parnassus, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
| | - Michael Kohn
- Nephrology and Hypertension at Parnassus, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
| | - Carmen A Peralta
- Nephrology and Hypertension at Parnassus, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94122 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Green JA, Ephraim PL, Hill-Briggs FF, Browne T, Strigo TS, Hauer CL, Stametz RA, Darer JD, Patel UD, Lang-Lindsey K, Bankes BL, Bolden SA, Danielson P, Ruff S, Schmidt L, Swoboda A, Woods P, Vinson B, Littlewood D, Jackson G, Pendergast JF, St Clair Russell J, Collins K, Norfolk E, Bucaloiu ID, Kethireddy S, Collins C, Davis D, dePrisco J, Malloy D, Diamantidis CJ, Fulmer S, Martin J, Schatell D, Tangri N, Sees A, Siegrist C, Breed J, Medley A, Graboski E, Billet J, Hackenberg M, Singer D, Stewart S, Alkon A, Bhavsar NA, Lewis-Boyer L, Martz C, Yule C, Greer RC, Saunders M, Cameron B, Boulware LE. Putting patients at the center of kidney care transitions: PREPARE NOW, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 73:98-110. [PMID: 30218818 PMCID: PMC6679594 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Care for patients transitioning from chronic kidney disease to kidney failure often falls short of meeting patients' needs. The PREPARE NOW study is a cluster randomized controlled trial studying the effectiveness of a pragmatic health system intervention, 'Patient Centered Kidney Transition Care,' a multi-component health system intervention designed to improve patients' preparation for kidney failure treatment. Patient-Centered Kidney Transition Care provides a suite of new electronic health information tools (including a disease registry and risk prediction tools) to help providers recognize patients in need of Kidney Transitions Care and focus their attention on patients' values and treatment preferences. Patient-Centered Kidney Transition Care also adds a 'Kidney Transitions Specialist' to the nephrology health care team to facilitate patients' self-management empowerment, shared-decision making, psychosocial support, care navigation, and health care team communication. The PREPARE NOW study is conducted among eight [8] outpatient nephrology clinics at Geisinger, a large integrated health system in rural Pennsylvania. Four randomly selected nephrology clinics employ the Patient Centered Kidney Transitions Care intervention while four clinics employ usual nephrology care. To assess intervention effectiveness, patient reported, biomedical, and health system outcomes are collected annually over a period of 36 months via telephone questionnaires and electronic health records. The PREPARE NOW Study may provide needed evidence on the effectiveness of patient-centered health system interventions to improve nephrology patients' experiences, capabilities, and clinical outcomes, and it will guide the implementation of similar interventions elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02722382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Green
- Department of Nephrology, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, PA, USA; Kidney Health Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - P L Ephraim
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - F F Hill-Briggs
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - T Browne
- College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | - T S Strigo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - C L Hauer
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - R A Stametz
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - J D Darer
- Decision Support Siemens Healthineers Malvern, PA, USA.
| | - U D Patel
- Division of Nephrology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.
| | - K Lang-Lindsey
- Department of Social Work, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL, USA.
| | - B L Bankes
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Bloomsburg, PA, USA
| | - S A Bolden
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - P Danielson
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Portland, OR, USA
| | - S Ruff
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Mooresville, NC, USA
| | - L Schmidt
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Liberty, Illinois, USA
| | - A Swoboda
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Edgewater, MD, USA
| | - P Woods
- Patient stakeholder co-author, Hartsdale, New York, NY, USA
| | - B Vinson
- Quality Insights Renal Network 5, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - D Littlewood
- The Care Centered Collaborative, Pennsylvania Medical Society, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
| | - G Jackson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - J F Pendergast
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - J St Clair Russell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - K Collins
- Patient Services, National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
| | - E Norfolk
- Department of Nephrology, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - I D Bucaloiu
- Department of Nephrology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - S Kethireddy
- Critical Care Medicine, Northeast Georgia Health System, Gainesville, GA, USA
| | - C Collins
- Adult Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - D Davis
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - J dePrisco
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - D Malloy
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - C J Diamantidis
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Nephrology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - S Fulmer
- Geisinger Health Plan, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - J Martin
- Program Development, National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
| | - D Schatell
- Medical Education Institute, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - N Tangri
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, 66 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada; Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Seven Oaks General Hospital, 2300 Mcphillips St, Winnipeg, MB R2V 3M3, Canada.
| | - A Sees
- Anthem, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - C Siegrist
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - J Breed
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - A Medley
- Geisinger Health Plan, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - E Graboski
- Kidney Health Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - J Billet
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - M Hackenberg
- Center for Clinical Innovation, Institute for Advanced Application, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - D Singer
- Renal Physicians Association, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | - S Stewart
- Council of Nephrology Social Workers, National Kidney Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
| | - A Alkon
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - N A Bhavsar
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - L Lewis-Boyer
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - C Martz
- Geisinger Health Plan, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - C Yule
- Kidney Health Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.
| | - R C Greer
- Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - M Saunders
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - B Cameron
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - L E Boulware
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sim JJ, Batech M, Danforth KN, Rutkowski MP, Jacobsen SJ, Kanter MH. End-Stage Renal Disease Outcomes among the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Creatinine Safety Program (Creatinine SureNet): Opportunities to Reflect and Improve. Perm J 2017; 21:16-143. [PMID: 28241912 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/16-143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) creatinine safety program (Creatinine SureNet) identifies and outreaches to thousands of people annually who may have had a missed diagnosis for chronic kidney disease (CKD). We sought to determine the value of this outpatient program and evaluate opportunities for improvement. METHODS Longitudinal cohort study (February 2010 through December 2015) of KPSC members captured into the creatinine safety program who were characterized using demographics, laboratory results, and different estimations of glomerular filtration rate. Age- and sex-adjusted rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were compared with those in the overall KPSC population. RESULTS Among 12,394 individuals, 83 (0.7%) reached ESRD. The age- and sex-adjusted relative risk of ESRD was 2.7 times higher compared with the KPSC general population during the same period (94.7 vs 35.4 per 100,000 person-years; p < 0.001). Screening with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (vs Modification Diet in Renal Diseases) equation would capture 44% fewer individuals and have a higher predictive value for CKD. Of those who had repeated creatinine measurements, only 13% had a urine study performed (32% among patients with confirmed CKD). CONCLUSION Our study found a higher incidence of ESRD among individuals captured into the KPSC creatinine safety program. If the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation were used, fewer people would have been captured while improving the accuracy for diagnosing CKD. Urine testing was low even among patients with confirmed CKD. Our findings demonstrate the importance of a creatinine safety net program in an integrated health system but also suggest opportunities to improve CKD care and screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Sim
- Nephrologist at the Los Angeles Medical Center in CA.
| | - Michael Batech
- Biostatistician in the Department of Research and Evaluation for Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena.
| | - Kim N Danforth
- Research Scientist in the Department of Research and Evaluation for Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena. E- mail:
| | - Mark P Rutkowski
- Nephrologist at the Baldwin Park Medical Center in Baldwin Park, CA.
| | - Steven J Jacobsen
- Director of Research in the Department of Research and Evaluation for Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena.
| | - Michael H Kanter
- Medical Director for Quality and Clinical Analysis for the Southern California Permanente Medical Group in Pasadena.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martin S, Wagner J, Lupulescu-Mann N, Ramsey K, Cohen A, Graven P, Weiskopf NG, Dorr DA. Comparison of EHR-based diagnosis documentation locations to a gold standard for risk stratification in patients with multiple chronic conditions. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8:794-809. [PMID: 28765864 PMCID: PMC6220706 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2016-12-ra-0210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure variation among four different Electronic Health Record (EHR) system documentation locations versus 'gold standard' manual chart review for risk stratification in patients with multiple chronic illnesses. METHODS Adults seen in primary care with EHR evidence of at least one of 13 conditions were included. EHRs were manually reviewed to determine presence of active diagnoses, and risk scores were calculated using three different methodologies and five EHR documentation locations. Claims data were used to assess cost and utilization for the following year. Descriptive and diagnostic statistics were calculated for each EHR location. Criterion validity testing compared the gold standard verified diagnoses versus other EHR locations and risk scores in predicting future cost and utilization. RESULTS Nine hundred patients had 2,179 probable diagnoses. About 70% of the diagnoses from the EHR were verified by gold standard. For a subset of patients having baseline and prediction year data (n=750), modeling showed that the gold standard was the best predictor of outcomes on average for a subset of patients that had these data. However, combining all data sources together had nearly equivalent performance for prediction as the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS EHR data locations were inaccurate 30% of the time, leading to improvement in overall modeling from a gold standard from chart review for individual diagnoses. However, the impact on identification of the highest risk patients was minor, and combining data from different EHR locations was equivalent to gold standard performance. The reviewer's ability to identify a diagnosis as correct was influenced by a variety of factors, including completeness, temporality, and perceived accuracy of chart data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David A Dorr
- David A. Dorr, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., MDYMICE, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mendu ML, Waikar SS, Rao SK. Kidney Disease Population Health Management in the Era of Accountable Care: A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing Care Across the CKD Spectrum. Am J Kidney Dis 2017; 70:122-131. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
26
|
Peralta CA, Frigaard M, Rubinsky AD, Rolon L, Lo L, Voora S, Seal K, Tuot D, Chao S, Lui K, Chiao P, Powe N, Shlipak M. Implementation of a pragmatic randomized trial of screening for chronic kidney disease to improve care among non-diabetic hypertensive veterans. BMC Nephrol 2017; 18:132. [PMID: 28399844 PMCID: PMC5389143 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0541-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) can improve the care of persons at high risk for complications remains uncertain. We describe the design and early implementation experience of a pilot, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial to evaluate the feasibility, implementation, and effectiveness of a "triple marker" CKD screening program (creatinine, cystatin C and albumin to creatinine ratio) for improving care among hypertensive veterans seen in primary care at one Veterans Administration Hospital. METHODS/DESIGN Non-diabetic hypertensive veterans age 18-80 without known CKD were randomized in clusters determined by primary care provider (unit of randomization) into three arms. Usual care will be compared with two incrementally intensified treatment strategies: (1) screen for CKD followed by patient and provider education or (2) screen-educate plus a clinical pharmacist-led CKD and BP management program. The primary clinical outcome is systolic blood pressure (BP) change from baseline. Secondary clinical outcome is BP control. The primary process outcomes is triple marker screening (across three arms), and secondary process outcomes include use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (ACE/ARB) overall and in persons with albuminuria, CKD recognition by PCP, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and NSAID education by PCP. The design uses the Veterans Health Administration electronic health record (EHR) to identify participants, deliver the interventions and ascertain study outcomes. Assessment of the program implementation will use the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Study duration is 12 months. RESULTS A total of 1,819 patients have been randomized within 41 provider clusters. The median age (interquartile range) is 68 years (61-72), and 99% of participants are male. Approximately 16% are Black, and 5% Hispanic. In the first 6 months of the trial, 434 triple marker screening tests have been ordered, and 217(50%) have been tested. A total of 48 new CKD cases have been identified among those tested, for a preliminary yield of 22%. CONCLUSION We have successfully implemented a pragmatic protocol that uses the EHR to identify and characterize eligible participants, deliver the intervention, and ascertain study outcomes with high rates of participation by providers and patients. Results from this study can guide design of pragmatic trials in the field of CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01978951 ; Date or Registration: 1/17/2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen A Peralta
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
| | - Martin Frigaard
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Anna D Rubinsky
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Leticia Rolon
- University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA
| | - Lowell Lo
- University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA
| | - Santhi Voora
- University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Ave, UC Hall, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Karen Seal
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Delphine Tuot
- San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave, SFGH 100, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| | - Shirley Chao
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Kimberly Lui
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Phillip Chiao
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Neil Powe
- San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Ave, SFGH 100, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA
| | - Michael Shlipak
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., 111A1, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jung HY, Unruh MA, Vest JR, Casalino LP, Kern LM, Grinspan ZM, Bao Y, Kaushal R. Physician Participation in Meaningful Use and Quality of Care for Medicare Fee-for-Service Enrollees. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 65:608-613. [DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Young Jung
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Mark Aaron Unruh
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Joshua R. Vest
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Management; Indiana University; Indianapolis Indiana
| | - Lawrence P. Casalino
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Lisa M. Kern
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Zachary M. Grinspan
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Yuhua Bao
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | - Rainu Kaushal
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research; Weill Cornell Medical College; New York New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen CC, Chang CH, Peng YC, Poon SK, Huang SC, Li YCJ. Effect of implementation of a coded problem list entry subsystem. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2016; 134:1-9. [PMID: 27480728 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/25/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Complete patient problem lists may improve the quality of care. To improve the completeness of the lists at our institution, we implemented the coded problem list entry subsystem (CPLES) in our electronic medical record system. Subsequently, physicians used the CPLES instead of handwritten notes to document coded problem lists and progress notes. We evaluated the effect of implementing the CPLES on the completeness of problem lists. METHODS We compared the completeness of coded problem lists input after CPLES implementation with that of problem lists handwritten before CPLES implementation and determined the differences. Moreover, the efficiency and usability of the CPLES were evaluated. RESULTS The efficiency and usability of CPLES were acceptable. However, the completeness of problem lists was reduced after CPLES implementation. The possible reasons for this reduction, namely system usability, efficacy, incentives, leadership, and education, were crucial for successful CPLES implementation and are discussed in the text. CONCLUSION CPLES implementation reduced the completeness of problem lists. Institutions may learn from our experience and carefully implement their own coded problem list systems to avoid this consequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; College of Medicine Science and Technology, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Chun Peng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sek-Kwong Poon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Che Huang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chuan Jack Li
- College of Medicine Science and Technology, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Dermatology, Taipei Medical University-Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saunders MR, Vela MB. Determinants and Outcomes of Nephrology Care. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31:596. [PMID: 26902241 PMCID: PMC4870424 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3634-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Milda R Saunders
- Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 So. Maryland Ave, MC 5000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Monica B Vela
- General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Parvez S, Abdel-Kader K, Pankratz VS, Song MK, Unruh M. Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Surrounding Conservative Management for Patients with Advanced CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:812-820. [PMID: 27084874 PMCID: PMC4858478 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.07180715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite the potential benefits of conservative management, providers rarely discuss it as a viable treatment option for patients with advanced CKD. This survey was to describe the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of nephrologists and primary care providers regarding conservative management for patients with advanced CKD in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We developed a questionnaire on the basis of a literature review to include items assessing knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices of conservative management for patients with advanced CKD. Potential participants were identified using the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We then conducted a web-based survey between April and May of 2015. RESULTS In total, 431 (67.6% nephrologists and 32.4% primary care providers) providers completed the survey for a crude response rate of 2.7%. The respondents were generally white, men, and in their 30s and 40s. Most primary care provider (83.5%) and nephrology (78.2%) respondents reported that they were likely to discuss conservative management with their older patients with advanced CKD. Self-reported number of patients managed conservatively was >11 patients for 30.6% of nephrologists and 49.2% of primary care providers. Nephrologists were more likely to endorse difficulty determining whether a patient with CKD would benefit from conservative management (52.8% versus 36.2% of primary care providers), whereas primary care providers were more likely to endorse limited information on effectiveness (49.6% versus 24.5% of nephrologists) and difficulty determining eligibility for conservative management (42.5% versus 14.3% of nephrologists). There were also significant differences in knowledge between the groups, with primary care providers reporting more uncertainty about relative survival rates with conservative management compared with different patient groups. CONCLUSIONS Both nephrologists and primary care providers reported being comfortable with discussing conservative management with their patients. However, both provider groups identified lack of United States data on outcomes of conservative management and characteristics of patients who would benefit from conservative management as barriers to recommending conservative management in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanah Parvez
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Khaled Abdel-Kader
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt Center for Kidney Disease, Nashville, Tennessee; and
| | - V. Shane Pankratz
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Mi-Kyung Song
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark Unruh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|