Biochemical Changes in Anterior Chamber of the Eye in Diabetic Patients-A Review

This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the biochemical changes observed in the anterior chamber of the eye in diabetic patients. The increased levels of inflammatory markers, alterations in antioxidant defense mechanisms, and elevated levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in the aqueous humor (AH) are explored. Additionally, the impact of these biochemical changes on diabetic retinopathy progression, increased intraocular pressure, and cataract formation is discussed. Furthermore, the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of these findings are presented. This study explores potential biomarkers for detecting diabetic eye disease at an early stage and monitoring its progression. An investigation of the targeting of inflammatory and angiogenic pathways as a potential treatment approach and the role of antioxidant agents in managing these biochemical changes is performed.

Phacoemulsification in patients with diabetic macular edema - A real-world data of 75 eyes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of phacoemulsification with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection in patients with cataract and diabetic macular edema (DME) across the grades of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective observational study. The study included 70 patients (75 eyes) with cataract and clinically significant macular edema in diabetics with nonproliferative (61 eyes) or proliferative (14 eyes) DR who underwent phacoemulsification with IVTA. Visual outcome and progression of DME over 3 months were studied in terms of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), respectively.

RESULTS

The case records of 70 patients (75 eyes) were studied. The mean baseline BCVA (n = 75) in the logMAR scale ± SD was 0.92 ± 0.53. 3 weeks after the surgery, the mean BCVA improved to 0.39 ± 0.26 and the mean CMT (n = 40) was 382.57 ± 192.30 compared with the mean preoperative CMT of 480.57 ± 163.25 in the same set (P = 0.01). The mean CMT decreased at 3 weeks in 22 (55% of the eyes). An improvement of ≥2 lines was seen at 3 weeks in 52 (69.33%) eyes and in 49 (65.33%) eyes at 3 months. The mean CMT at 3 months was 445.51 ± 222.99 (n = 70) compared to the preoperative mean CMT of 470.72 ± 176.15 in the same set (P = 0.29). The mean CMT decreased at 3 months in 34 (48.5%) eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Phacoemulsification with IVTA injection improved the mean visual acuity at 3 weeks and 3 months in two-thirds of cases and decreased the mean CMT at 3 weeks in nearly half the numbers.

Does dexamethasone inhibit glucose oxidase: an analysis in kinetics and molecular study

OBJECTIVE

Glucose oxidase is an enzyme that is widely used in biosensors, especially kits for measuring blood sugar. Many diabetics use this type of kit to determine their blood sugar level. Aspergillus niger is the most important source of glucose oxidase for use in biosensors. Diabetes causes secondary diseases in patients for which medications are prescribed to improve them. Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, is one of the drugs prescribed to diabetics to cure some secondary diseases. In this study, the effect of this drug on glucose oxidase was investigated from a kinetic and molecular point of view.

METHODS

In this study, the kinetics of drug binding to the enzyme was measured and the type of inhibition was determined by Lineweaver-Burk plot. The Ki value of the drug was determined by drawing the secondary curve. Using fluorescence spectrophotometry and molecular docking, the binding of the drug to the enzyme was confirmed.

RESULTS

The results showed that the drug inhibits the enzyme non-competitively. Determining the kinetics parameters of the drug-enzyme interaction showed that the drug acts as a potent inhibitor. Study at the molecular level by fluorescence spectrophotometer showed that the drug attachment alters the enzyme conformation to more compaction. In silico results showed that the drug is placed between two helices that are outside the active site and binds to the enzyme by three hydrogen bonds.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of this study is useful because it suggests that in diabetic patients taking dexamethasone, the amount of glucose declared by the kit may not be real due to the inhibition of glucose oxidase.

New Insights into Treating Early and Advanced Stage Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in the working-age population. The disease progresses slowly, and we can roughly differentiate two stages: early-stage (ESDR), in which there are mild retinal lesions and visual acuity is generally preserved, and advanced-stage (ASDR), in which the structural lesions are significant and visual acuity is compromised. At present, there are no specific treatments for ESDR and the current recommended action is to optimize metabolic control and maintain close control of blood pressure. However, in the coming years, it is foreseeable that therapeutic strategies based in neuroprotection will be introduced in the clinical arena. This means that screening aimed at identifying patients in whom neuroprotective treatment might be beneficial will be crucial. Regarding the treatment of ASDR, the current primary course is based on laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of anti-angiogenic factors or corticosteroids. Repeated intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents as the first-line treatment would be replaced by more cost-effective and personalized treatments based on the results of “liquid biopsies” of aqueous humor. Finally, topical administration (i.e., eye drops) of neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic agents will represent a revolution in the treatment of DR in the coming decade. In this article, all these approaches and others will be critically discussed from a holistic perspective.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Systemic Versus Local Steroid Treatment in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: A Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Steroid therapy is known to be effective against granulomatous mastitis. We aimed to compare the efficacy of local versus systemic steroid administration in patients with idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 58 patients who had either local (n = 42) or systemic (n = 16) treatment due to granulomatous mastitis between 2015 and 2019. Recurrence rates were determined as per ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging examinations and the rate of side effects was evaluated as per patient complaints and physical examinations at the end of a 2-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Median doses of 140 mg and 3810 mg were administered to the local and systemic group, respectively. Six (14.3%) patients in the local treatment group and 13 (81.3%) in the systemic treatment group had steroid-related side effects. The local treatment group had significantly fewer side effects than the systemic treatment group (P < 0.001). The recurrence rates were similar in both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Local steroid injection was as effective as systemic steroid therapy. Compared to systemic therapy, local steroid administration can be considered as a new therapeutic protocol with a lower dose and side effect rate.

Steroid Treatment in Macular Edema: A Bibliometric Study and Visualization Analysis

The use of steroids to treat macular edema (ME) is a research hotspot in ophthalmology. We utilized CiteSpace and VOSviewer software to evaluate the Web of Science Core Collection publications and to build visualizing maps to describe the research progress in this topic. There were 3,252 publications for three decades during 1988–2021. The number of studies was low during the first 14 years but has risen consistently in the following two decades. The average publications per year were only 4.8 during 1988–2002, which jumped to 113 per year during 2003–2012, and 227 per year during 2013–2021. These publications came from 83 countries/regions, with the United States, Germany, and Italy leading positions. Most studies were published in Investigative Ophthalmology Visual Science, and Ophthalmology was the most cited journal. We found 9,993 authors, with Bandello F having the most publications and Jonas JB being the most frequently co-cited. According to our research, the most popular keyword is triamcinolone acetonide (TA). Macular edema, diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), dexamethasone (DEX), fluocinolone acetonide (FA), and some other keywords were commonly studied in this field. In conclusion, the bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of steroid hotspots and developmental tendencies in the macular edema study. While anti-VEGF therapy is the first-line treatment for DME and RVO-induced macular edema, steroids implant is a valid option for these DME patients not responding to anti-VEGF therapy and non-DME patients with macular edema. Combined therapy with anti-VEGF and steroid agents is vital for future research.

Diabetic macular edema: Safe and effective treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Taioftal)

Purpose

To suggest the safety and efficacy of preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injectable suspension (Taioftal) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Methods

A prospective clinical study involved 49 patients (49 eyes), that were treated with Taioftal and followed-up for six months. Complete ophthalmic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography, was performed at baseline, and at month 1, 3, 6 after the intravitreal injection. Accurate collection and analysis of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events (AEs) were carried out in order to evaluate visual function and macular morphology before and after treatment

Results

Median BCVA value chosen as comparing statistics was significantly improved at every follow-up time points (gain of 6 letters at month 1, 12 at month 3 –improvement up to 24% at month 3 with stabilization until month 6) compared to baseline, as certified by Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (P<0.05). Median CFT significantly waned at each follow-up times (decrease of about 65 μm at month 1, 155 at month 3 –reduction up to 28% at month 3 keeping good outcome until month 6) compared to baseline (P<0.05). IOP elevation, with no severe increases, was the most common among spotted AEs (median of 23 mmHg at month 1, 20 at month 3).

Conclusion

Intravitreal injection of preservative-free triamcinolone (Taioftal) is an effective, safe and inexpensive drug used to improve visual acuity and reduce central foveal thickness in eyes affected by diabetic macular edema during an average time of 6 months. Temporary, never severe, elevation of IOP is totally manageable with topical medications. No serious vision-threatening complications are related to the use of intravitreal triamcinolone injections.

Macrophage-Like Cell Density Is Increased in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Characterized by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Purpose

To quantitatively characterize macrophage-like cells (MLCs) at the vitreoretinal interface in different severity stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods

The study included 72 eyes of 72 subjects: 18 healthy controls, 22 diabetes mellitus (DM) without DR, 17 nonproliferative DR (NPDR), and 15 proliferative DR (PDR). We obtained repeated (average, 6.5; range, 3-10) macular OCTA scans for each eye. We registered and averaged the 3-µm OCT slab above the vitreoretinal interface to visualize MLCs. Using a semiautomated method, we binarized and quantified MLCs and compared MLC densities among groups. We also evaluated MLC distribution relative to underlying superficial capillary plexus vasculature and quantified MLCs overlying blood vessels within the perivascular 30-µm watershed region and within ischemic zones (defined as >30 µm from the nearest vessel).

Results

MLC density was 2.8- to 3.8-fold higher in PDR compared with all other groups (P < 0.05 for all). MLC density in PDR was most increased in perivascular areas (3.3- to 4.2-fold; P < 0.05 vs. all) and on blood vessels (3.0- to 4.0-fold; P < 0.05 vs. all), and elevated to a lesser extent in ischemic areas (2.3- to 3.4-fold; P < 0.05 vs. all). MLCs were more likely to localize on blood vessels in DM without DR, NPDR, and PDR (P < 0.05 for all), but not healthy eyes.

Conclusions

MLC density was significantly increased in PDR. MLCs clustered on blood vessels in diabetic but not in healthy eyes. Further studies are needed to confirm the origin, identity, and function of MLCs during DR.

Direct and indirect therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine as an add-on for non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in many countries. The current treatment for non-proliferative DR (NPDR) using Western medicine (WM) alone is insufficient. At present, the combination of NPDR treatment with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and WM is universally applied. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TCM as an add-on for NPDR using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Method

Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCM for NPDR treatment along with WM before July 6, 2019, were collected from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Database, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Relevant data were extracted by two reviewers. I² statistics was adopted to appraise heterogeneity. If I² < 50% the fixed-effects model was employed, otherwise a random-effect model was employed. (PROSPERO: CRD42019134947)

Result

Eighteen RCTs (1522 patients) were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed that compared with WM alone, TCM (including Compound Xueshuantong Capsule, Qiming Granule, and others) combined with WM for NPDR could improve the overall effiicacy [n = 1686, RR 1.24 (1.18,1.30), P < 0.00001, I² = 0%], and reduce the influence of risk factors related to NPDR, such as glycated hemoglobin level [n = 360, MD − 0.85 (− 1.28, − 0.41), P = 0.0001, I² = 72%], triglyceride (P < 0.00001), and total cholesterol (P = 0.0008). Moreover, no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Compared with WM alone, TCM + WM could significantly improve NPDR and also reduce the correlation levels of risk factors, such as hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia. However, the small sample included in the study might lead to a publication bias, and therefore, our results should be treated with caution.

A New Approach for Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: review of clinical practice results with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant including vitrectomized eyes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fluocinolone acetonide is a synthetic fluorinated glucocorticoid. It has selective and potent agonist properties by binding to the cytosolic glucocorticoid receptor with high affinity; it is devoid of mineralocorticoid activity. Two extended-release (i.e. lasting up to 3 years) drug delivery systems containing fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) have been approved by the FDA for intravitreal use: Retisert ® (Bausch&Lomb, New Jersey, USA) and Iluvien ® (Alimera Sciences, Atlanta, USA). The former contains 0.59 mg of FAc, which is approved for the treatment of chronic noninfectious posterior segment uveitis. The latter contains a dose of 0.19 mg of FAc and is approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema and here we review the results published in the clinical literature relating to its use in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

RECENT FINDINGS

The 0.19 mg FAc implant (Iluvien®) is a new approved treatment approach for DME. It is a non-biodegradable implant that continuously releases a microdose of FAc into the vitreous cavity for up to three years. It is effective in chronic DME with the added value of decreasing the treatment burden of multiple intravitreal injections. Recently, clinical practice studies are reporting its efficacy and safety profile (intra-ocular pressure rise and cataract), as well as its use in clinical setting not included in clinical trial such as vitrectomized eyes.

SUMMARY

The FAc implant has demonstrated in clinical practice results that mirror the results of the clinical trials efficacy wise. Regarding its safety profile, cataract is a common complication, however, intra-ocular pressure rises may be lower than the ones reported in trials. The implant has shown effectiveness in vitrectomized eyes. An increasing evidence of real-world studies have supported utility of the implant in DME patients. It's extended-release format for up to 3 years benefits to the patient and carer as it means fewer injections and visits to the clinic.

Diabetic retinopathy: new therapeutic perspectives based on pathogenic mechanisms

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of visual impairment and preventable blindness and represents a significant socioeconomic cost for healthcare systems worldwide. In early stages of DR the only therapeutic strategy that physicians can offer is a tight control of the risk factors for DR (mainly blood glucose and blood pressure). The currently available treatments for DR are applicable only at advanced stages of the disease and are associated with significant adverse effects. Therefore, new treatments for the early stages of DR are needed. However, in early stages of DR invasive treatments such as intravitreal injections are too aggressive, and topical treatment seems to be an emerging route. In the present review, therapeutic strategies based on the main pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of DR are reviewed. The main gap in the clinical setting is the treatment of early stages of DR and, therefore, this review emphasizes in this issue by giving an overview of potential druggable targets. By understanding of disease-specific pathogenic mechanisms, biological heterogeneity and progression patterns in early and advanced DR a more personalised approach to patient treatment will be implemented.

Corticosteroid Treatment in Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema is the most common cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus. The pathogenesis of macular edema is complex and multifactorial. For many years, laser photocoagulation has been considered the standard therapy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema; however, few patients achieve significant improvements in visual acuity. Today the intravitreal administration of anti-inflammatory or anti-angiogenic agents together with the use of laser photocoagulation represents the standard of care for the treatment of this complication. The intravitreal route of administration minimizes the systemic side effects of corticosteroids. Steroid-related ocular side effects are elevated intraocular pressure and cataract, while injection-related complications include endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment. In order to reduce the risks and complications, intravitreal implants have been developed recently to provide sustained release of corticosteroids and reduce repeated injections for the management of diabetic macular edema. In this review, the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential of intravitreal corticosteroids in diabetic macular edema are discussed with a review of recent literature.

An eighteen-month follow-up study on the effects of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF therapy

AIM

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implants in subjects affected by diabetic macular edema (DME) resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

METHODS

Thirty-two DME patients were enrolled. A 700 microgram slow release Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex^®) was placed in the vitreous cavity. All patients were followed for 18mo. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) and central macular thickness (CMT) exams were carried out at baseline (T0) and after 1 (T1), 3 (T3), 4 (T4), 6 (T6), 9 (T9), 12 (T12), 15 (T15), and 18mo (T18) post injection.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA showed an effect of treatment on ETDRS (P<0.0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that ETDRS values were significantly increased at T1, T3, T4, T9, and T15 (P<0.001) as compared to baseline value (T0). At T6, T12, and T18, ETDRS values were still statistically higher than baseline (P<0.001 vs T0). However, at these time points, we observed a trend to return to baseline conditions. ANOVA also showed an effect of treatment (P<0.0001). CMT decreased significantly at T1, T3, T4, T9, and T15 (P<0.001). At T6 (P<0.01), T12 and T18 (P<0.001) CMT was also significantly lower than T0 although a trend to return to the baseline conditions was also observed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant is a good option to improve BCVA and CMT in DME patients resistant to anti-VEGF therapy. Our data also show that the use of drugs administered directly into the vitreous allows achieving appropriate and long-lasting concentration at the site of disease without systemic side effects.

Elevated Intraocular Pressure After Intravitreal Steroid Injection in Diabetic Macular Edema: Monitoring and Management

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing use of intravitreal administration of corticosteroids in macular edema, steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) rise is becoming an emergent issue. However, for patients in whom intravitreal steroids are indicated, there are no specific recommendations for IOP monitoring and management after intravitreal administration of corticosteroids.

METHOD

An expert panel of European ophthalmologists reviewed evidence on corticosteroid-induced IOP elevation. The objective of the panel was to propose an algorithm based on available literature and their own experience for the monitoring and management of corticosteroid-induced IOP elevation, with a focus on diabetic patients.

RESULTS

Data from trials including diabetic patients with a rise of IOP after intravitreal steroid administration indicate that IOP-lowering medical treatment is sufficient for a large majority of patients; only a small percentage underwent laser trabeculoplasty or filtering filtration surgery. A 2-step algorithm is proposed that is based on the basal value of IOP and evidence for glaucoma. The first step is a risk stratification before treatment. Patients normotensive at baseline (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg), do not require additional baseline diagnostic tests. However, patients with baseline ocular hypertension (OHT) (IOP > 21 mmHg) should undergo baseline imaging and visual field testing. The second step describes monitoring and treatment after steroid administration. During follow-up, patients developing OHT should have baseline and periodical imaging and visual field testing; IOP-lowering treatment is proposed only if IOP is >25 mmHg or if diagnostic tests suggest developing glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

The management and follow-up of OHT following intravitreal corticosteroid injection is similar to that of primary OHT. If OHT develops, IOP is controlled in a large proportion of patients with standard IOP treatments. The present algorithm was developed to assist ophthalmologists with guiding principles in the management of corticosteroid-induced IOP elevation.

FUNDING

Alimera Sciences Limited.

Basement membrane stiffening promotes retinal endothelial activation associated with diabetes

Endothelial activation is a hallmark of the high-glucose (HG)-induced retinal inflammation associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, precisely how HG induces retinal endothelial activation is not fully understood. We hypothesized that HG-induced up-regulation of lysyl oxidase (LOX), a collagen-cross-linking enzyme, in retinal capillary endothelial cells (ECs) enhances subendothelial basement membrane (BM) stiffness, which, in turn, promotes retinal EC activation. Diabetic C57BL/6 mice exhibiting a 70 and 50% increase in retinal intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression and leukocyte accumulation, respectively, demonstrated a 2-fold increase in the levels of BM collagen IV and LOX, key determinants of capillary BM stiffness. Using atomic force microscopy, we confirmed that HG significantly enhances LOX-dependent subendothelial matrix stiffness in vitro, which correlated with an ∼2.5-fold increase in endothelial ICAM-1 expression, a 4-fold greater monocyte-EC adhesion, and an ∼2-fold alteration in endothelial NO (decrease) and NF-κB activation (increase). Inhibition of LOX-dependent subendothelial matrix stiffening alone suppressed HG-induced retinal EC activation. Finally, using synthetic matrices of tunable stiffness, we demonstrated that subendothelial matrix stiffening is necessary and sufficient to promote EC activation. These findings implicate BM stiffening as a critical determinant of HG-induced retinal EC activation and provide a rationale for examining BM stiffness and underlying mechanotransduction pathways as therapeutic targets for diabetic retinopathy.

New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches for Preventing the Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a severe sight-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus. Retinal laser photocoagulation, antivascular endothelial growth factors, steroid therapy, and pars plana vitrectomy are now used extensively to treat advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy. Currently, diagnostic devices like ultrawide field fundus fluorescein angiography and the improvement of optical coherence tomography have provided quicker and more precise diagnosis of early diabetic retinopathy. Thus, treatment protocols have been modified accordingly. Various types of lasers, including the subthreshold micropulse laser and RPE-targeting laser, and selective targeted photocoagulation may be future alternatives to conventional retinal photocoagulation, with fewer complications. The new developed intravitreal medications and implants have provided more therapeutic options, with promising results.

Nonbiological pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

INTRODUCTION

During the past decade, there have been significant advances in the pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Among the presently available treatment options, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents are the most favored agents due to their efficacy and safety. The index review focuses on nonbiological therapies that have entered in phase 3 clinical trials for DME.

AREAS COVERED

An extensive review of the literature was performed to identify various nonbiological immunotherapies i.e., drugs other than '-mAbs' (monoclonal antibodies including anti-VEGF agents), '-mibs' (proteasome inhibitors), '-NAbs' (nanoparticle albumin-bound), and '-nibs' (small molecule inhibitor/tyrosine kinase inhibitors), among others. Extended-release low-dose corticosteroid devices have been recently approved for the treatment of DME. Other compounds such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibody mimetic proteins, nonbiological growth factor inhibitors, and inhibitors of protein kinase C have been described.

EXPERT OPINION

A number of therapies are under development for the pharmacological management of DME. Due to the rising healthcare costs associated with anti-VEGF agents, a number of alternate treatment options have been explored recently. Some of these agents have reached phase 3 in clinical trials and appear to have a promising role in the management of DME. As further research is conducted, the role of each individual agent will become more defined, alone or in combination therapy.

The Vitreomacular Interface in Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading health concern and a major cause of blindness. DR can be complicated by scar tissue formation, macular edema, and tractional retinal detachment. Optical coherence tomography has found that patients with DR often have diffuse retinal thickening, cystoid macular edema, posterior hyaloid traction, and tractional retinal detachment. Newer imaging techniques can even detect fine tangential folds and serous macular detachment. The interplay of the vitreous and the retina in the progression of DR involves multiple chemokine and other regulatory factors including VEGF. Understanding the cells infiltrating pathologic membranes at the vitreomacular interface has opened up the possibility of new targets for pharmacotherapy. Vitrectomies for DR remain a vital tool to help relieve tension on the macula by removing membranes, improving edema absorption, and eliminating the scaffold for new membrane formation. Newer treatments such as triamcinolone acetonide and VEGF inhibitors have become essential as a rapid way to control DR at the vitreomacular interface, improve macular edema, and reduce retinal neovascularization. These treatments alone, and in conjunction with PRP, help to prevent worsening of the VMI in patients with DR.

What have we learnt about the management of diabetic macular edema in the antivascular endothelial growth factor and corticosteroid era?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the outcomes of the use of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and corticosteroids on the treatment paradigm for diabetic macular edema (DME).

RECENT FINDINGS

Favorable efficacy data along with acceptable long-term safety results of anti-VEGF agents have made them the standard first-line therapy in the management of DME. Level I evidence from large, multicenter clinical trials has established the beneficial role of anti-VEGF agents and intravitreal steroids. In addition, the role of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy has also been recently recognized. However, concerns such as suboptimal response, VEGF resistance, and long-term effects on retinal layers and vasculature have also been highlighted recently.

SUMMARY

The use of anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids has revolutionized the management of DME. Despite the advantages including ease of administration, low incidence of adverse events, and concomitant improvement in retinopathy status, limitations of this therapeutic approach have been recognized. The current review will focus on the lessons learnt in the management of DME in the anti-VEGF and steroid era.

Novel approaches for treating diabetic retinopathy based on recent pathogenic evidence

Diabetic retinopathy remains as a leading cause of blindness in developed countries. Current treatments target late stages of DR when vision has already been significantly affected. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of DR would permit the development of more efficient preventional/interventional strategies against early stages of DR. In this article a critical review of the state of the art of this issue is provided along with a discussion of problems which have yet to be overcome. Neuroprotection as a new approach for the treatment of the early stages of DR has been particularly emphasized. The development and progression of DR is not homogeneous and, apart from blood glucose levels and blood pressure, it depends on genetic factors which remain to be elucidated. In addition, the role of the pathogenic pathways is not the same in all patients. All these factors should be taken into account in the near future when an individualized oriented treatment for DR could become feasible. The new techniques in retinal imaging acquisition, the identification of useful circulating biomarkers and the individualized analysis of biological samples could facilitate the development of early and personalized therapy in the setting of DR. Finally, it should be noted that only a coordinated action among ophthalmologists, diabetologists, basic researchers, experts in pharmaco-economics and health care providers addressed to the design of rational strategies targeting prevention and the early stages of DR will be effective in reducing the burden and improving the clinical outcome of this devastating complication of diabetes.