Subcortical hemorrhage caused by cerebral amyloid angiopathy compared with hypertensive hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Most published reports on lobular hemorrhage in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) include patients diagnosed only by imaging studies. This study analyzed patients with subcortical hemorrhage histologically diagnosed as CAA or non-CAA (hypertensive).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study analyzing data from 100 craniotomy cases. Tissue of hematoma cavity wall was collected for histological investigation in hematoma removal by surgery in patients with subcortical hemorrhage. Statistical analyses of blood pressure, hematoma location and volume, outcome, and mortality was performed in CAA and non-CAA groups.

RESULTS

There were 47 CAA and 53 non-CAA cases, and average age was significantly older in the CAA group (p < 0.01). Blood pressure was significantly lower (p < 0.01) but hematoma volume was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the CAA group. Rebleeding occurred in two CAA cases and one non-CAA case, but no re-operations were required. Average score of modified Rankin Scale, which is used to measure the degree of disability in patients who have had a stroke, at three months after surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (CAA: 3.94 ± 1.28, non-CAA: 3.58 ± 1.50). There were seven deaths in the CAA and six in the non-CAA group, and intraventricular hemorrhage highly complicated in the death cases in both groups. In the CAA group, average age of the fatal cases was significantly older than that of the surviving cases (p < 0.05) and six cases demonstrated dementia before onset of hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical removal of a subcortical hemorrhage caused by CAA is not contraindicated. However, age > 80 years, complication with intraventricular hemorrhage, hematoma volume ≥ 50 ml, and dementia before onset of hemorrhage contribute to high mortality, and craniotomy should be carefully considered for such patients. A limitation of this study is that comparison between CAA and non-CAA groups was performed in the patients with only surgically indicated ICH, and does not evaluate entire ICH cases with CAA. However, this study appropriately compared pathologically diagnosed CAA and non-CAA in patients with moderate to severe lobular ICH with surgical indications.

Intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients with a prior intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis

Background:

The history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) is considered a contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Objective: This study aimed at comparing the safety of IVT among patients with and without a history of ICrH.

Methods:

We performed a systematic review of the literature. Data regarding all AIS patients with prior ICrH who received IVT were retrieved. Meta-analysis was performed to compare the rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sHT), death within 90 days, and favorable and unfavorable 90-day functional outcomes based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) among stroke patients with and without prior ICrH.

Results:

Out of 13,032 reviewed records, 7 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Quantitative synthesis of data regarding the rate of sHT (5068 patients) revealed no significant difference between the two groups [odds ratio, OR: 1.55 (0.77, 3.12); p = 0.22]. However, a significantly higher risk of death within 90 days [OR: 3.91 (2.16, 7.08); p < 0.00001] and a significantly higher 90-day poor functional outcomes (mRS, 4–6) [OR: 1.57 (1.07, 2.30); p = 0.02] were observed among patients with prior ICrH. Likewise, the percentage of 90-day good functional outcomes (mRS, 0–1) was lower in the prior ICrH group [OR: 0.54 (0.35, 0.84); p = 0.06]. Subgroup analyses in patients with a history of ICrH (based on both patients’ medical history and imaging confirmation) revealed no significant between-group differences in rates of sHT. Also, sensitivity analysis consisting of only studies using standard-dose IVT showed no difference in sHT rates and 90-day outcomes between the two groups. There was no evidence of heterogeneity (I² >50%) among included studies.

Conclusion:

The results of this study indicated that prior history of ICrH does not increase the risk of sHT post-IVT, but it is associated with a higher risk of death and poor functional outcomes in 90 days.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is labelled as a contraindication for the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) based on expert opinion. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the benefits and risks of IV-tPA in this population. Recent small retrospective cohort studies reporting its off-label use suggest it may be beneficial. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on IV-tPA use in AIS patients with and without previous ICH. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2021. Outcomes measured included symptomatic ICH (sICH), 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and 3-month mortality. We included seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 5760 AIS patients who had received IV-tPA, of which 134 had previous ICH. There was no significant difference in the odds of sICH (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.78-3.15, p = 0.21) and 3-month mRS (mRS 0-1: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.65, p = 0.52; mRS 0-2: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.36-3.15, p = 0.90) between patients with and without previous ICH. There was a trend towards higher 3-month mortality in patients with previous ICH (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98-2.91, p = 0.06), although this did not reach statistical significance. The use of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH was not associated with an increased risk of sICH or disability at 3 months. Further larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA use in this population.

Previous chronic symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebral hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

Identifying previous chronic cerebral hemorrhage (PCH), especially asymptomatic cases in patients with ischemic stroke, is essential for proper antithrombotic management. The study aimed to further clarify the prevalence of PCH and the associated factors in patients with acute ischemic stroke using multi-modal neuroimaging including susceptibility-weighted MR imaging (SWI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of 382 patients with acute ischemic stroke. All patients underwent 3.0-T MRI for cranial SWI, 1.5-T or 3.0-T conventional cranial MRI, and cranial CT. Patients found with PCH were matched 1:4 with patients without PCH. Clinical manifestation, computed tomography, conventional cranial MRI, and cranial SWI were used to determine PCH. Clinical and neuroimaging findings between the patients with symptomatic vs. asymptomatic PCH were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (36/382, 9.4%) were determined to have had a PCH. Of these 36 patients, 17 (17/36, 47.2%, or 17/382, 4.5%) had asymptomatic PCH. Multivariable analysis showed that serum total cholesterol (OR = 0.510, 95%CI 0.312-0.832, P = 0.007), cerebral microbleeds (OR = 6.251, 95%CI 2.220-17.601, P = 0.001), and antithrombotic drugs history (OR = 3.213, 95%CI 1.018-10.145, P = 0.047) were independently associated with PCH. Asymptomatic PCH had similar clinical and neuroimaging characteristics with symptomatic PCH.

CONCLUSION

PCH is not uncommon in acute ischemic stroke patients. Total serum cholesterol, cerebral microbleeds on SWI, and history of antithrombotic drugs were independently associated with PCH in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Asymptomatic PCH, which is easier to be missed and has similar characteristics with symptomatic PCH, should draw much attention.

Should we exclude acute stroke patients with previous intracerebral hemorrhage from receiving intravenous thrombolysis?

Background

Current guidelines have contraindicated history of intracerebral hemorrhage for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

Aim

This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for patients who had previous intracerebral hemorrhage on history or initial brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

Using a prospective multicenter stroke registry database, we identified acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 h of onset. Previous intracerebral hemorrhage was defined as having a clinical history or evidence of old intracerebral hemorrhage on initial brain magnetic resonance imaging. Associations of previous intracerebral hemorrhage with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation during hospitalization and functional outcome and mortality at discharge and three months were analyzed.

Results

Among 1495 patients who were treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, 73 (4.9%) had previous intracerebral hemorrhage; 9 on history only, 61 on magnetic resonance imaging only and 3 on both. Of those 1495 patients, 71 (4.7%) experienced symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation; 6.8% in patients with previous intracerebral hemorrhage and 4.6% in those without previous intracerebral hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that previous intracerebral hemorrhage did not significantly increase the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.39–2.96) mortality, and most of functional outcome measures

Conclusions

Previous intracerebral hemorrhage may neither increase the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation nor alter major clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. This study suggests reconsideration of prior history of intracerebral hemorrhage as an exclusion criterion for intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration in acute ischemic stroke.