1
|
Pérez-Blanco A, Seoane JA, Pallás TA, Nieto-Moro M, Calonge RN, de la Fuente A, Martin DE. Uterus Transplantation as a Surgical Innovation. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:367-378. [PMID: 37382845 PMCID: PMC10624705 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10272-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Uterus transplantation (UTx) research has been introduced in several countries, with trials in Sweden and the United States producing successful outcomes. The growing interest in developing UTx trials in other countries, such as Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia, raises important questions regarding the ethics of surgical innovation research in the field of UTx. This paper examines the current state of UTx in the context of the surgical innovation paradigm and IDEAL framework and discusses the ethical challenges faced by those considering the introduction of new trials. We argue that UTx remains an experimental procedure at a relatively early stage of the IDEAL framework, especially in the context of de novo trials, where protocols are likely to deviate from those used previously and where researchers are likely to have limited experience of UTx. We conclude that countries considering the introduction of UTx trials should build on the strengths of the reported outcomes to consolidate the evidence base and shed light on the uncertainties of the procedure. Authorities responsible for the ethical governance of UTx trials are advised to draw on the ethical framework used in the oversight of surgical innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - José-Antonio Seoane
- Philosophy, Constitution and Rationality Research Group, Faculty of Law, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Montserrat Nieto-Moro
- Paediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Dominique E Martin
- Geelong Waurn Ponds Campus, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corrigan N, Brown JM, Emsley R, Jayne DG, Walwyn REA. Surgical trial design for incorporating the effects of learning: what is the current methodological guidance, and is it sufficient? Trials 2023; 24:294. [PMID: 37095568 PMCID: PMC10127059 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07265-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical interventions are complex. Key elements of this complexity are the surgeon and their learning curve. They pose methodological challenges in the design, analysis and interpretation of surgical RCTs. We identify, summarise, and critically examine current guidance about how to incorporate learning curves in the design and analysis of RCTs in surgery. EXAMINING CURRENT GUIDANCE Current guidance presumes that randomisation must be between levels of just one treatment component, and that the evaluation of comparative effectiveness will be made via the average treatment effect (ATE). It considers how learning effects affect the ATE, and suggests solutions which seek to define the target population such that the ATE is a meaningful quantity to guide practice. We argue that these are solutions to a flawed formulation of the problem, and are inadequate for policymaking in this setting. REFORMULATING THE PROBLEM The premise that surgical RCTs are limited to single-component comparisons, evaluated via the ATE, has skewed the methodological discussion. Forcing a multi-component intervention, such as surgery, into the framework of the conventional RCT design ignores its factorial nature. We briefly discuss the multiphase optimisation strategy (MOST), which for a Stage 3 trial would endorse a factorial design. This would provide a wealth of information to inform nuanced policy but would likely be infeasible in this setting. We discuss in more depth the benefits of targeting the ATE conditional on operating surgeon experience (CATE). The value of estimating the CATE for exploring learning effects has been previously recognised, but with discussion limited to analysis methods only. The robustness and precision of such analyses can be ensured via the trial design, and we argue that trial designs targeting CATE represent a clear gap in current guidance. CONCLUSION Trial designs that facilitate robust, precise estimation of the CATE would allow for more nuanced policymaking, leading to patient benefit. No such designs are currently forthcoming. Further research in trial design to facilitate the estimation of the CATE is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Corrigan
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Julia M Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David G Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca E A Walwyn
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ceelen W, Demuytere J, de Hingh I. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Critical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133114. [PMID: 34206563 PMCID: PMC8268659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Patients with cancer of the digestive system or ovarian cancer are at risk of developing peritoneal metastases (PM). In some patients with PM, surgery followed by intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has emerged as a valid treatment option. The addition of hyperthermia is thought to further enhance the efficacy of IP chemotherapy. However, the results of recent clinical trials in large bowel cancer have put into question the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Here, we review the rationale and current results of HIPEC for PM and propose a roadmap to further progress. Abstract With increasing awareness amongst physicians and improved radiological imaging techniques, the peritoneal cavity is increasingly recognized as an important metastatic site in various malignancies. Prognosis of these patients is usually poor as traditional treatment including surgical resection or systemic treatment is relatively ineffective. Intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapeutic agents is thought to be an attractive alternative as this results in high tumor tissue concentrations with limited systemic exposure. The addition of hyperthermia aims to potentiate the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy, resulting in the concept of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases as it was developed about 3 decades ago. With increasing experience, HIPEC has become a safe and accepted treatment offered in many centers around the world. However, standardization of the technique has been poor and results from clinical trials have been equivocal. As a result, the true value of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases remains a matter of debate. The current review aims to provide a critical overview of the theoretical concept and preclinical and clinical study results, to outline areas of persisting uncertainty, and to propose a framework to better define the role of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-9332-6251
| | - Jesse Demuytere
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ignace de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands;
- GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peinemann F, Labeit A. Negative pressure wound therapy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials from 2000 to 2017. J Evid Based Med 2019; 12:125-132. [PMID: 30460777 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) proposes to provide better wound healing than standard wound management. Evidence quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) varies. METHODS We included participants with any kind of wounds and commercial as well as the homemade NPWT system. Comparators were any other wound dressing including variant NPWTs. We included RCTs randomizing patients or wounds in parallel or crossover designs. We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library on January 03, 2018. We assessed the risk of bias according to Cochrane and appropriateness of clinical endpoints according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). RESULTS We included 93 RCTs originating in 30 countries, 70 studies on open wounds and 23 studies on closed wounds. With respect to random sequence generation, we judged an unclear or high risk of bias in 50% (47 of 93) studies. With respect to allocation concealment, we judged an unclear or high risk of bias in 90% (84 of 93). We identified 41% (38 of 93) studies that based their conclusion on not appropriate endpoints. CONCLUSIONS High risk of bias concerning random sequence generation and allocation concealment limited the credibility of the majority of 93 included RCTs on NPWT. A low risk of bias can and should be achieved with both items, and we recommend to align future RCTs to Cochrane. Many primary clinical endpoints were deemed not valid for making inferences on the efficacy of NPWT. We recommend using patient-centered endpoints as requested by the FDA and suggested in the present systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Peinemann
- Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
- FOM University of Applied Science for Economics & Management, Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Labeit
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biological, Medical and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McBride KE, Solomon MJ, Bannon PG, Young JM. Enhancing surgical research at the hospital level: a new model. ANZ J Surg 2018; 87:431-432. [PMID: 28585756 DOI: 10.1111/ans.13949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Revised: 01/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E McBride
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul G Bannon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Baird Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane M Young
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rhodes D, Fogg QA, Lazarus MD. Get SET: aligning anatomy demonstrator programmes with Surgical Education and Training selection criteria. ANZ J Surg 2017; 88:E406-E411. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.14359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Rhodes
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Center for Human Anatomy Education; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Quentin A. Fogg
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Center for Human Anatomy Education; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Michelle D. Lazarus
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Center for Human Anatomy Education; Monash University; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McBride KE, Young JM, Bannon PG, Solomon MJ. Assessing surgical research at the teaching hospital level. ANZ J Surg 2016; 87:70-75. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.13863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E. McBride
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS); Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Jane M. Young
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS); Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe); Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Paul G. Bannon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS); Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- The Baird Institute; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Michael J. Solomon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS); Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe); Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Broekman ML, Carrière ME, Bredenoord AL. Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e3790. [PMID: 27336866 PMCID: PMC4998304 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000003790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 01/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present article was to systematically review the ethics of surgical innovation and introduce the components of the learning health care system to guide future research and debate on surgical innovation.Although the call for evidence-based practice in surgery is increasingly high on the agenda, most surgeons feel that the format of the randomized controlled trial is not suitable for surgery. Innovation in surgery has aspects of, but should be distinguished from both research and clinical care and raises its own ethical challenges.To answer the question "What are the main ethical aspects of surgical innovation?", we systematically searched PubMed and Embase. Papers expressing an opinion, point of view, or position were included, that is, normative ethical papers.We included 59 studies discussing ethical aspects of surgical innovation. These studies discussed 4 major themes: oversight, informed consent, learning curve, and vulnerable patient groups. Although all papers addressed the ethical challenges raised by surgical innovation, surgeons hold no uniform view of surgical innovation, and there is no agreement on the distinction between innovation and research. Even though most agree to some sort of oversight, they offer different alternatives ranging from the formation of new surgical innovation committees to establishing national registries. Most agree that informed consent is necessary for innovative procedures and that surgeons should be adequately trained to assure their competence to tackle the learning curve problem. All papers agree that in case of vulnerable patients, alternatives must be found for the informed consent procedure.We suggest that the concept of the learning health care system might provide guidance for thinking about surgical innovation. The underlying rationale of the learning health care system is to improve the quality of health care by embedding research within clinical care. Two aspects of a learning health care system might particularly enrich the necessary future discussion on surgical innovation: integration of research and practice and a moral emphasis on "learning activities." Future research should evaluate whether the learning health care system and its adjacent moral framework provides ethical guidance for evidence-based surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marike L. Broekman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences
| | - Michelle E. Carrière
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences
| | - Annelien L. Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evrard S. Repenser la recherche clinique en chirurgie oncologique. De l’opéra-comique au contrôle qualité. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:87-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
10
|
Beyer K, Heidecke CD. [Are the measures to ensure patient safety in surgery evidence-based?]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2015; 109:230-4. [PMID: 26189173 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Revised: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Errors occurring in surgical procedures often have serious consequences for the patients. For this reason various measures have been designed over the past few years to ensure a greater level of patient safety in surgery. One such measure is the implementation of the WHO safety checklist in German hospitals. The benefits of this checklist on postoperative complications have been substantiated by evidence from EbM level II studies and meta-analyses. The application of further tools such as the systematic rating of hospitals in terms of defined operative procedures would appear theoretically rational, but has not been demonstrated by studies with a higher level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Beyer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland
| | - Claus-Dieter Heidecke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Abteilung für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|