1
|
Tamura K, Uchino M, Nomura S, Shinji S, Kouzu K, Fujimoto T, Nagayoshi K, Mizuuchi Y, Ohge H, Haji S, Shimizu J, Mohri Y, Yamashita C, Kitagawa Y, Suzuki K, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Yoshida M, Mizuguchi T, Mayumi T, Kitagawa Y, Nakamura M. Updated evidence of the effectiveness and safety of transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:71. [PMID: 38916755 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02942-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a major complication after rectal low anterior resection (LAR). Transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement offers a potential strategy for AL prevention; however, its efficacy and safety remain contentious. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were used to evaluate the influence of TDT subsequent to LAR as part of the revision of the surgical site infection prevention guidelines of the Japanese Society of Surgical Infectious Diseases (PROSPERO registration; CRD42023476655). We searched each database, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBSs) comparing TDT and non-TDT outcomes. The main outcome was AL. Data were independently extracted by three authors and random-effects models were implemented. RESULTS A total of three RCTs and 18 OBSs were included. RCTs reported no significant difference in AL rate between the TDT and non-TDT groups [relative risk (RR): 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-1.15]. OBSs reported that TDT reduced AL risk [odds ratio (OR): 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.64]. In the subgroup excluding diverting stoma (DS), TDT significantly lowered the AL rate in RCTs (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.99) and OBSs (OR: 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62). Reoperation rates were significantly lower in the TDT without DS groups in both RCTs (RR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.94) and OBSs (OR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66). TDT groups exhibited a higher anastomotic bleeding rate only in RCTs (RR: 4.28, 95% CI 2.14-8.54), while shorter hospital stays were observed in RCTs [standard mean difference (SMD): -0.44, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.23] and OBSs (SMD: -0.54, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.11) compared with the non-TDT group. CONCLUSIONS A universal TDT placement cannot be recommended for all rectal LAR patients. Some patients may benefit from TDT, such as patients without DS creation. Further investigation is necessary to identify the specific beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Tamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
| | - M Uchino
- Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - S Nomura
- Department of Surgery, Hayamizu-Park Clinic, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - S Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Kouzu
- Department of Surgery, National Defence Medical College, Saitama, Japan
| | - T Fujimoto
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - K Nagayoshi
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Y Mizuuchi
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - H Ohge
- Department of Infectious Disease, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - S Haji
- Department of Surgery, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - J Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Y Mohri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - C Yamashita
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Y Kitagawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
| | - K Suzuki
- Department of Infectious Disease Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - M Kobayashi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hokushinkai Megumino Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - M Kobayashi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Research and Education Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - M Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - T Mizuguchi
- Department of Nursing, Surgical Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - T Mayumi
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Japan Community Health Care Organization Chukyo Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Y Kitagawa
- School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xia S, Wu W, Ma L, Luo L, Yu L, Li Y. Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1198549. [PMID: 37274258 PMCID: PMC10235681 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer. The use of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) during surgery to prevent AL remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of TDT in reducing AL. Methods Relevant data and studies published from inception until November 1, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to compare the incidence of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer with and without TDT. Results This meta-analysis included 5 RCTs comprising 1385 patients. The results showed that the intraoperative use of TDT could not reduce the incidence of AL after rectal cancer surgery (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.59; p = 0.75). A subgroup analysis of different degrees of AL revealed that TDT did not reduce the incidence of postoperative grade B AL (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67-2.09; p = 0.56) but decreased the incidence of grade C AL (RR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12-0.64; p = 0.003). Further, TDT did not reduce the incidence of AL in patients with rectal cancer and a stoma (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.01-5.71; p = 0.05). Conclusion TDT were ineffective in reducing the overall incidence of AL, but they might be beneficial in reducing the incidence of grade C AL in patients who underwent anterior resection. However, additional multicenter RCTs with larger sample sizes based on unified control standards and TDT indications are warranted to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijun Xia
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wenjiang Wu
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lijuan Ma
- Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Anorectal Hospital, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| | - Lidan Luo
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| | - Linchong Yu
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yue Li
- Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Futian, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Role of transanal drainage tubes in preventing anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:931-939. [PMID: 35915290 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02665-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transanal drainage tube (TDT) is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with low anterior resection (LAR). However, results from different clinical trials are inconsistent, although nearly all meta-analyses agree on the efficacy. In contrast to results of many previous studies, 2 recent independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that the use of TDT does not prevent AL. We performed a meta-analysis including only RCTs to compare patients with TDTs vs. those without TDTs in terms of AL rate. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO/ICTRP from inception until February 14, 2022. RCTs that evaluated the role of TDTs in AL prevention in patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer were included. A meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Data were extracted by two authors independently, and random-effects models were implemented. The main outcome was AL, and the secondary outcome was the grade of AL. RESULTS Three RCTs were included involving a total of 1115 participants (559 patients in the TDT group and 556 in the non-TDT group). No significant difference in the AL rate was detected (RR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-1.15, p = 0.15, I2 = 21%, very low certainty evidence). The incidence of grade C AL was possibly lower in the TDT group (RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-1.01, p = 0.05, very low certainty evidence), while the rate of grade B AL was similar between the two groups (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.08, p = 0.59, very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis suggests that TDTs are not effective in reducing the overall incidence of AL, but possibly have a potential benefit in reducing the occurrence of grade C AL in patients with LAR. Based on the current limited data and existing heterogeneity, the inclusion of larger populations and the identification of more uniform indications for TDT need to be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nishizawa Y, Nishigori H, Tsukada Y, Sasaki T, Tsukamoto S, Kanemitsu Y, Nakano D, Yamaguchi T, Otsuka K, Nakamura T, Shiomi A, Iwasaki N, Tamura H, Wakabayashi M, Nomura S, Ito M. A multicentre confirmatory single-arm trial of the safety and efficacy of a transanal drain for prevention of anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:3196-3204. [PMID: 34379874 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Recent reports have described the use and efficacy of several types of transanal tube (TAT) for preventing anastomotic leakage by reducing intraluminal pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly developed TAT for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. METHOD A multicentre confirmatory single-arm trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new TAT after LAR for rectal cancer. A total of 115 patients were registered in the trial at several cancer centres and other hospitals. All patients initially received reconstruction with a stapled anastomosis, but 18 then underwent creation of a diverting stoma. Of the remaining 97 patients, the first 96 were included in the protocol-defined primary analysis set. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic leakage and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of complications associated with use of the TAT. The TAT was placed during LAR without creating a covering stoma and the drain was removed 4 or 5 days postoperatively. RESULTS The rate of symptomatic leakage was 5.2% (95% confidence interval 1.7-11.7), which was significantly lower than the predetermined threshold value of 15.8% (one-sided p-value 0.0013). Only one patient had Grade 3 rectal bleeding that might have been related to use of the TAT. CONCLUSION This nonrandomized study shows that the TAT appears to be safe and results in lower rates of anastomotic leakage in LAR compared with previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Nishizawa
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hideaki Nishigori
- Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery Division, Shinko Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tsukada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsukamoto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chou-ku, Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chou-ku, Japan
| | - Daisuke Nakano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chou-ku, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chou-ku, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - Koki Otsuka
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan
| | - Takatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Akio Shiomi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Japan
| | - Natsuko Iwasaki
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Hitomi Tamura
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shogo Nomura
- Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao S, Zhang L, Gao F, Wu M, Zheng J, Bai L, Li F, Liu B, Pan Z, Liu J, Du K, Zhou X, Li C, Zhang A, Pu Z, Li Y, Feng B, Tong W. Transanal Drainage Tube Use for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:1151-1158. [PMID: 34613330 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) is crucial for colorectal surgery. Some studies have suggested a positive role of transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) in AL prevention after low anterior resection, but this finding is controversial. Objective To assess the effect of TDTs in AL prevention after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter randomized clinical trial with parallel groups (TDT vs non-TDT) was performed from February 26, 2016, to September 30, 2020. Participants included patients from 7 different hospitals in China who were undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with the double-stapling technique for mid-low rectal cancer; 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study, and 16 were later excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT and non-TDT groups. Interventions A silicone tube was inserted through the anus, and the tip of the tube was placed approximately 5 cm above the anastomosis under laparoscopy at the conclusion of surgery. The tube was fixed with a skin suture and connected to a drainage bag. The TDT was scheduled for removal 3 to 7 days after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the postoperative AL rate within 30 days. Results In total, 576 patients were initially enrolled in this study; 16 of these patients were excluded. Ultimately, 560 patients were randomly divided between the TDT group (n = 280; median age, 61.5 years [IQR, 54.0-68.8 years]; 177 men [63.2%]) and the non-TDT group (n = 280; median age, 62.0 years [IQR, 52.0-69.0 years]; 169 men [60.4%]). Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the TDT and non-TDT groups in AL rates (18 [6.4%] vs 19 [6.8%]; relative risk, 0.947; 95% CI, 0.508-1.766; P = .87) or AL grades (grade B, 14 [5.0%] and grade C, 4 [1.4%] vs grade B, 11 [3.9%] and grade C, 8 [2.9%]; P = .43). In the stratified analysis based on diverting stomas, there was no significant difference in the AL rate between the groups, regardless of whether a diverting stoma was present (without stoma, 12 [5.8%] vs 15 [7.9%], P = .41; and with stoma, 6 [8.3%] vs 4 [4.5%], P = .50). Anal pain was the most common complaint from patients in the TDT group (130 of 280, 46.4%). Accidental early TDT removal occurred in 20 patients (7.1%), and no bleeding or iatrogenic colonic perforations were detected. Conclusions and Relevance The results from this randomized clinical trial indicated that TDTs may not confer any benefit for AL prevention in patients who undergo laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer without preoperative radiotherapy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02686567.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Zhao
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Luyang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Gansu, China
| | - Miao Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Jianyong Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lian Bai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fan Li
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Baohua Liu
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zehui Pan
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of The Chinese People's Liberation Army, Gansu, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia Surgery, Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, China
| | - Kunli Du
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiong Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chunxue Li
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Anping Zhang
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhizhong Pu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Breast Surgery, The People's Hospital of Kaizhou District, Chongqing, China
| | - Yafei Li
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Tong
- Gastric and Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital), Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu Z, Wang Q, Li Z, Ji J. Use of transanal drainage tube to prevent anastomotic leakage: intangible differences between the East and the West. Br J Surg 2021; 108:e121-e122. [PMID: 33793729 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Trans-anal drainage tube is used to reduce the rectal pressure, especially at the anastomotic site and thus to protect the anastomosis. Ideally it serves as and even may replace a diverting stoma. When compared to no treatment, the effectiveness of TDT seems confirmed based on the literature, but it remains uncertain whether TDT can replace the diverting stoma. Despite the insignificant tangible costs of TDT, it seems different cultures put varied weight on the intangible costs such as discomfort and pain to patients after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Q Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Z Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - J Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choy KT, Yang TWW, Heriot A, Warrier SK, Kong JC. Does rectal tube/transanal stent placement after an anterior resection for rectal cancer reduce anastomotic leak? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1123-1132. [PMID: 33515307 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03851-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that either a transanal stent (TAS) or rectal tube (RT) can decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for rectal cancer, in which a diverting stoma may not be required. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review was to investigate the efficacy and safety of RT/TAS in preventing AL after anterior resections. DATA SOURCES An up-to-date systematic review was performed on the available literature between 2000 and 2020 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane Library databases. STUDY SELECTION All studies reporting on anterior resections in adults, comparing transanal tube/stent versus non-tube/stent, were analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome was rates of AL, whereas secondary outcomes compared associated unplanned re-operation for AL and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS Two randomized controlled trials and 13 observational studies were included, with 1714 patients receiving RT/TAS and 1741 patients without. There were 119 (7%) patients with AL in the RT/TAS group compared to 216 (12.3%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.38-0.62, p < 0.001). There were 47 (2.9%) patients with AL complications requiring surgery in the RT/TAS group compared to 132 (8%) patients in the non-RT/TAS group (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.42, p < 0.001) and no significant difference identified with the standardized mean difference (SMD) favouring the RT/TAS group for hospital LOS (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.06, p = 0.115). CONCLUSION The use of RT/TAS post restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer should be considered, given the benefits shown from this meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay T Choy
- Department of Surgery, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
| | - Tze Wei Wilson Yang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph C Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dumble C, Morgan T, Wells CI, Bissett I, O'Grady G. The impact of transanal tube design for preventing anastomotic leak in anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 25:59-68. [PMID: 33125604 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02354-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Placement of a transanal tube (TAT) into the rectum is a strategy used to attempt to prevent anastomotic leak (AL) in anterior resection surgery. There is a wide variation in materials and tube design in devices used as TATs and previous meta-analyses have not considered TAT design in their analyses. This study reviews the impact that design of TAT has on AL rates. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed with the aim of identifying studies evaluating the use of TATs for preventing AL and then defining the design of TATs. Studies were then compared in groups based on TAT design in a meta-analysis to evaluate whether design is an important variable in outcomes. RESULTS Thirty-three studies were included. There was a wide variety of tubes used as TATs. On meta-analysis, catheter-type TATs were associated with a substantially lower rate of AL (OR: 0.46; 95% CI 0.30, 0.68). By contrast, stent-type TATs were not associated with any reduction in the incidence of AL (OR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.50, 2.22). Catheter-type TATs were also associated with substantial reductions in the rate of reoperation (OR: 0.32; 95% CI 0.20, 0.50), whereas stent-type TATs showed no benefit in the rate of reoperation (OR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.37, 1.65). CONCLUSIONS Off-the-shelf catheter-type transanal tubes appeared effective in preventing AL, whereas custom-designed stent-type TATs were not demonstrated to be effective; although high quality evidence is limited. TAT design should be an important consideration in further research of the use of TATs in anterior resection surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dumble
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland Hospital Clinical Support Block, 2 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - T Morgan
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland Hospital Clinical Support Block, 2 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
| | - C I Wells
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland Hospital Clinical Support Block, 2 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - I Bissett
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland Hospital Clinical Support Block, 2 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| | - G O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland Hospital Clinical Support Block, 2 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luo Y, Zhu CK, Wu DQ, Zhou LB, Wang CS. Effect comparison of three different types of transanal drainage tubes after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BMC Surg 2020; 20:166. [PMID: 32711482 PMCID: PMC7382045 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00811-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe early complications after rectal cancer surgery. Many studies and meta-analysis results show that the indentation of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) can prevent and reduce the incidence of AL. However, the size and material of drainage tubes are rarely reported. Herein, we compare the effect of three kinds of TDT and analyze the use of TDT material and size to prevent AL, which may better prevent the occurrence of AL. Methods The clinical data of 182 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed between January 2016 and March 2019. According to the types of indwelling TDT after the operation, they were divided into Fr32 silicone tubes (81 cases), Fr24 silicone tubes (54 cases), Fr24 latex tubes (47 cases). The first drainage, exhaust, defecation, abdominal distension and anastomotic leakage of the patients with three different types of TDT were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the degree of first exhaust, abdominal distension and anastomotic leakage among three different types of TDT; the time of first drainage and defecation of the Fr32 silicone tube was significantly earlier than that of Fr24 silicone tube and Fr24 latex tube. Conclusion The drainage effect of the Fr32 silicone tube is better than that of Fr24 silicone tube and Fr24 latex tube after anterior resection for rectal cancer, Fr32 silicone may better prevent the occurrence of AL, but randomized controlled studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Chang-Kang Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ding-Quan Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Liang-Bi Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Beibei Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Chong-Shu Wang
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Cancer Center, Nanchong Oriental Hospital, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang FG, Yan WM, Yan M, Song MM. Comparison of anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate between transanal tube placement and defunctioning stoma after anterior resection: A network meta-analysis of clinical data. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1301-1309. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Wang FG, Yan WM, Yan M, Song MM. Outcomes of transanal tube placement in anterior resection: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg 2018; 59:1-10. [PMID: 30266662 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, transanal tube placement was reported to be an effective procedure preventing anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. However, this procedure is still controversial owing to inconsistent results found in previous studies. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library from the databases inception up until June 21, 2018. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were evaluated by Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS 1 randomized controlled trial and 9 cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. The randomized controlled trial was proven to be low risk according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. All of the cohort studies proved a high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Patients in transanal tube group had more disadvantageous preoperative demographic characteristics than patients in non-transanal tube group. The anastomotic leak rate was lower in the transanal tube group. Patients in the transanal tube group tended to have lower reoperation rates and shorter hospital stays compared with patients in the non-transanal tube group. CONCLUSION Despite various unfavorable preoperative characteristics, anastomotic leakage after anterior resection was lower in patients who received transanal tube placement compared with the control group. Transanal tube placement may be an alternative procedure of defunctioning stoma. A large sample size, multicenter RCT was needed to prove our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fu-Gang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China; Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Wen-Mao Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China; Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Ming Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mao-Min Song
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen H, Cai HK, Tang YH. An updated meta-analysis of transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leak in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:333-340. [PMID: 30217286 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Transanal drainage tube (TDT) placement is widely used to reduce AL, but its efficacy remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of TDT for prevention of AL, using updated evidence. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating the effectiveness of TDT for prevention of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer were identified by using a predefined search strategy. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled rates of AL, reoperation, anastomotic bleeding and mortality separately. RESULTS One RCT and ten cohort studies which including 1170 cases with TDT and 1262 cases without TDT were considered eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that the TDT group was associated with a significant lower rates of AL (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.31-0.58, P < 0.00001) and reoperation (RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.19-0.45, P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in anastomotic bleeding rate and mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS TDT placement is associated with significant lower rates of AL and reoperation, hence it is likely to be an effective method of preventing and reducing AL after rectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Chen
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan province, China
| | - Hong-Ke Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yun-Hao Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Transanal Tube for the Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2016; 41:267-276. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3758-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
14
|
Yang Y, Shu Y, Su F, Xia L, Duan B, Wu X. Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:1513-1523. [PMID: 27620910 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5193-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal decompression tube (TDT), an alternative intervention believed to have potential equivalent efficacy in reducing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery and lower complication rates compared to protective stoma, was sporadically applied in some medical centers during recent decade. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the TDT in preventing the anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS The studies comparing TDT and non-TDT in rectal cancer were researched up to March 22, 2016 without language preference, in databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and National Clinical Trials Registry. The rates of anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and re-operation were separately calculated and compared between TDT and non-TDT groups using RevMan 5.3. Funnel plots, and Egger's tests were used to evaluate the publication biases of the studies. RESULTS Two prospective randomized controlled trial studies and five observational cohort studies with 833 participants in TDT group and 939 participants in non-TDT group were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that the TDT group had lower anastomotic leakage rate than non-TDT group with significant RR (RR 0.44; 95 % CI 0.29-0.66; P < 0.0001) and heterogeneity (I 2 = 33 %; P = 0.18). So did the re-operation rate, with RR (RR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.07-0.37; P < 0.0001) and heterogeneity among the studies (I 2 = 0 %; P = 0.80). There was no significant difference in anastomotic bleeding rates (RR 1.48; 95 % CI 0.79-2.77; P = 0.22) (I 2 = 58 %; P = 0.09). No publication bias was found by Egger's test (anastomotic leakage rate, Pr > |z| = 0.224; re-operation rate, Pr > |z| = 0.425). CONCLUSIONS TDT might be an efficient and economic intervention in preventing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University/West China Hospital, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ye Shu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fangyu Su
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Lin Xia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Baofeng Duan
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiaoting Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Lane, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|