Whole-Saliva Fluoride Levels and Saturation Indices in 65+ Elderly during Use of Four Different Toothpaste Regimens

Salivary fluoride bioavailability after use of high-fluoride dentifrices with different compositions: A short-term randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the kinetics of salivary F bioavailability after the use of high-fluoride dentifrices with different compositions and their amount of total soluble fluoride (TSF).

METHODS

A short-term clinical randomized trial was performed in which 15 adult participants were randomly allocated into three groups: 5000 ppm F-dentifrice, 5000 ppm F-dentifrice + TCP (tri-calcium phosphate) and 1450 ppm F-dentifrice. Unstimulated saliva was collected at different times: baseline (before toothbrushing), immediately after brushing/water rinsing and at 5, 15 and 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h after brushing. The TSF in dentifrices and saliva samples was analysed using an ion-specific electrode. For statistical analysis, the paired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis were used with Dunn's post-test with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the declared TSF and that found in 5000 ppm F-dentifrice and 1450 ppm F-dentifrice (p ≥ 0.13); however, in the 5000 ppm F-dentifrice + TCP, approximately 500 ppm less TSF was observed (p = 0.0024). The area under the curve (AUC, μg F/ml min-1) of both high-fluoride dentifrices (321.7 ± 84.0 and 223.6 ± 55.1 for the one without and with TCP, respectively) was higher than the conventional one (89.97 ± 15.6) attesting a higher F-bioavailability (p = 0.04). Furthermore, they were able to provide F-salivary levels higher than the baseline for up to 2 h, while this time was 1 h for the 1450 ppm F-dentifrice (p ≤ 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Both high-fluoride dentifrices similarly increased the salivary-F bioavailability in comparison with 1450 ppm F-dentifrice, despite the lower TSF presented by the dentifrice containing TCP.

Salivary fluoride levels after daily brushing with 5000 ppm fluoride toothpaste: A randomised, controlled clinical trial

This study explored salivary fluoride levels following toothbrushing with 5000 and 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste and determined the decline in salivary fluoride levels following the return from 5000 to 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste. The study was a randomised, controlled double-blind parallel clinical trial (n = 24/group) measuring salivary fluoride five times during a 3-week trial phase involving 2×/day use of 5000 or 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste, and five times during an ensuing 2-week wash-out phase where all participants used 1450 ppm toothpaste. Salivary fluoride was measured using a fluoride electrode and data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Baseline salivary fluoride geometric means were 0.014 and 0.016 ppm for the 1450 and 5000 ppm groups, while the values at the end of the trial phase were 0.023 and 0.044 ppm, respectively. During the trial phase, except at baseline, differences between groups were statistically significant. The salivary fluoride levels for the 5000 ppm group remained statistically significantly higher than for the 1450 ppm group only at the first measurement in the wash-out phase (≈30 h after the last 5000 ppm brushing), indicating that higher salivary fluoride levels resulting from use of 5000 ppm are sustained only as long as the brushing habit continues.

Nocturnal Salivary Fluoride Bioavailability After Brushing with a High-fluoride Dentifrice

The use of fluoridated dentifrices is recognized as the main reason for the decline of dental caries and its effect is associated with the bioavailability of fluoride (F) in the oral cavity. High-fluoride dentifrice has been indicated for patients at high risk of caries and management of root lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the bioavailability of F in saliva after the use of high-fluoride dentifrice during the nocturnal period. Fifteen healthy adults participated in this is in vivo and crossover study in which the concentration of F in their saliva was determined after brushing with the tested dentifrices: a conventional (1450 ppm F) or with high-fluoride concentration (5000 ppm F). Before brushing, the participants collected the non-stimulated saliva (baseline), immediately after brushing (time zero) and after 5min, 2h, 4h, and 8h, during the nocturnal period (between 10:00 pm and 06:00 am). The salivary F concentration was determined using a specific F ion electrode. Regarding statistical analysis, a paired t-test was used to compare dentifrices with p fixed at 5%. At baseline, there was no significant difference between groups (p>0.001). Immediately after brushing, both dentifrices increased the F salivary concentration, with the highest concentration reached in time zero; however, the use of 5000 ppm F dentifrice maintained the higher F salivary concentration at all times evaluated (p<0.001), remaining higher until 8 h after brushing. Furthermore, this treatment showed higher F bioavailability in relation to time, evaluated by the area under the curve (p<0.001). Thus, it can be concluded that the high-fluoride dentifrice increased the bioavailability of salivary F during the nocturnal period in comparison with conventional dentifrice.

Dose-Response Effect of Fluoride Dentifrices on De-/Remineralization of Root Dentine in situ

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of fluoride (F) dentifrice with different F concentrations on root dentine de-/remineralization. Ten healthy volunteers took part in this randomized, double-blinded, cross-over, and split-mouth in situ experimental study. During 4 phases of 7 days, they wore a palatal appliance containing 4 bovine dentine blocks (2 sound and 2 with caries) of 4 × 4 × 2 mm. Treatments were performed with silica-based dentifrices containing 0, 700, 1,300, and 5,000 µg F/g (F as NaF). To provide a cariogenic challenge, a 20% sucrose solution was dripped 3 and 8 times daily on the carious-like and sound blocks, respectively. After each experimental phase, the percentage of surface hardness loss (%SHL) or recovery (%SHR) was calculated and the fluoride concentration in the biofilm was determined. The statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test with p at 5%. The relationship between variables was analyzed by linear regression. The results showed a lower %SHL when 5,000 µg F/g dentifrice was used but without a statistically significant difference from the conventional one (1,300 µg F/g). Regarding remineralization and F in biofilms, the high-fluoride dentifrice was expressively superior in mineral replacement on the surface and in the F concentration in the biofilms, respectively, compared to the other 3 products (p < 0.05). Also, a significant linear fit between mineral loss/gain, F in biofilms, and fluoride concentration in the dentifrices could be observed. In conclusion, a dose-response F effect was observed, and the high-fluoride dentifrice was effective in enhancing root dentine remineralization in this short-term in situ study.

Oral health of centenarians and supercentenarians

There are many studies on the homebound and institutionalized elderly; however, few studies focus on centenarians and supercentenarians, i.e., people aged 100 and 110 years, respectively. Due to the demographic changes, the population of centenarians is set to increase more than that of other age groups. Therefore, this article aims to review the available literature regarding how oral health might display in this age group and highlight aspects necessitating further research. Oral health, oral health-related quality of life, saliva, and the oral microbiome were emphasized in this study. Most papers relevant to the research questions were excluded because the mean age of participants was <100 years. Only two papers were found on centenarians' oral health status and saliva and no studies were found focusing on the oral health-related quality of life or oral microbiome. The reviewed studies demonstrate that centenarians presented with good oral mucosal conditions, dental conditions, and general health. The present literature is insufficient to come to a definite conclusion regarding how aging affects the oral health of centenarians and supercentenarians. The limited available research indicates that centenarians display better oral health than other individuals in their respective birth cohorts.

Adjunctive use of fluoride rinsing and brush-on gel increased incipient caries-like lesion remineralization compared with fluoride toothpaste alone in situ

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the remineralizing effect of sodium fluoride (NaF) mouth rinse or NaF gel as an adjunct to NaF dentifrice on incipient caries-like lesions in an in situ cross-over design study, with three sessions of 30 days each. Materials and methods: Orthodontic brackets with artificial demineralized enamel slabs were attached to the upper first molars of 12 participants. A set of 3 test specimens from the same tooth was randomly assigned to each participant and allocated into three 30-day sessions: 1) brushing with 0.22% NaF dentifrice 2 times/day (F dentifrice), 2) brushing with 0.22% NaF dentifrice 2 times/day+ rinsing with 0.05% NaF before bedtime (F mouth rinse), 3) brushing with 0.22% NaF dentifrice 2 times/day + brushing with 1.1% NaF gel before bedtime (F brush-on gel). The mineral gain and lesion depth of the specimens were evaluated by micro-computed tomography. Results: The mean mineral gain from the NaF mouth rinse and the NaF brush-on gel was similar, but greater than that from the NaF dentifrice (p < .05). The NaF brush-on gel yielded the greatest mean depth of remineralization (168 µm), followed by the NaF mouth rinse (144 µm). Both depths were significantly greater than that of the NaF dentifrice (84 µm) (p < .05). Conclusions: Both 0.05% NaF mouth rinse and 1.1% NaF brush-on gel, used at bedtime, increased incipient caries-like lesion remineralization in situ in combination with brushing with NaF dentifrice twice a day.

Fluoride in Saliva and Oral Mucosa after Brushing with 1,450 or 5,000 ppm Fluoride Toothpaste

The aim was to measure and compare fluoride concentrations in oral mucosa and saliva following a single brushing with either 1,450 or 5,000 ppm fluoride toothpaste. Fourteen healthy participants provided saliva and oral mucosa samples in the morning before tooth brushing. Then participants brushed their teeth with 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste, and saliva and mucosa samples were collected after 1, 2, 4, and 6 h. The experiment was repeated 3-7 days later with 5,000 ppm fluoride toothpaste. All samples were analyzed for fluoride using an ion-selective electrode adapted for microanalysis. Pre-brushing fluoride concentrations were higher in mucosa (mean1,450 0.26 ppm and mean5,000 0.20 ppm) than in saliva (mean1,450 0.08 ppm and mean5,000 0.07 ppm). The mean fluoride concentrations increased in both mucosa and saliva following a single brushing with both 1,450 ppm (meanmuc1,450 (1 h) 1.15 ppm, meansal1,450 (1 h) 0.33 ppm) and 5,000 ppm fluoride toothpaste (meanmuc5,000 (1 h) 3.21 ppm and meansal5,000 (1 h) 0.90 ppm). At 6 h, the fluoride concentrations had returned to pre-brushing levels. Across the 6-h sampling period the fluoride concentration in saliva was statistically significantly 1.4 times higher following brushing with 5,000 ppm compared with 1,450 ppm fluoride toothpaste. For mucosa, this ratio was only 1.1 and not statistically significant. In conclusion, the fluoride level in oral buccal mucosa is higher than in saliva and follows the same fluoride clearance pattern as in saliva. Over the initial 6-h period following a single tooth brushing, the ratio of the fluoride concentration in mucosa to that in saliva is independent of the fluoride concentrations in the toothpastes used.

Prevention of dental caries as a non-communicable disease

Today, dental caries is regarded as a preventable non-communicable disease (NCD) that affects a majority of the population across their lifespan. As such, it shares a number of behavioural, socio-economic, and lifestyle factors with other NCDs, such as overweight and diabetes, and should be subjected to a similar model of chronic disease management. Caries prevention has traditionally relied on fluoride exposure, diet control, thorough oral hygiene, and antibacterial measures. Prevention of caries as an NCD does certainly not disqualify these methods, but brings them into a new context. This conference paper provides a brief review on how common preventive measures can interfere with the drivers of dysbiosis and promote the growth of health-associated clusters in the oral microbiome. Besides the established routines of regular toothbrushing with fluoride products, there is an opportunity for additional technologies, based on ecological principles, to address and modify the oral biofilm. Methods to reduce dietary sugar intake, slow down plaque metabolism, and support saliva functions should be further developed and investigated in terms of efficacy, compliance, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, biofilm engineering through pre- and probiotics early in life to support microbial diversity seem promising in order to obtain a sustained caries-preventive effect.

Dentistry and nursing working together to improve oral health care in a long-term care facility

Inadequate oral care in long-term care (LTC) facilities compromises the quality of life of residents. This study assessed oral care knowledge of, and challenges experienced by, nurses and allied nursing staff (ANS) in a LTC facility in Canada. Dentists and nursing staff used the findings to implement strategies for improved care. Using a sequential mixed method design, data on oral care knowledge and practices were collected using self-administered questionnaires (n = 114) and focused groups (n = 39). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. While participants (>80%) felt knowledgeable and confident in providing oral care, they desired improved skills to overcome resistive behavior, communication, and wanted adapted oral care materials. Implemented strategies included skills-acquisition workshop, oral care posters, and oral health champion. Overall, our interprofessional collaboration increased awareness of the need for oral care training, and implemented strategies to help nursing staff overcome barriers in providing care.

Effect of dentifrice containing fTCP, CPP-ACP and fluoride in the prevention of enamel demineralization

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of different fluoride- and calcium- and/or phosphate-containing products on their ability to prevent enamel demineralization under pH cycling conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Enamel bovine specimens were assigned to the following groups: G1-MPP (MI Paste Plus, 0.2% NaF, Recaldent™, GC Corporation Tokyo, Japan); G2-FD (Crest™ Cavity Protection, 0.243% NaF, Procter & Gamble, USA); G3-CLP (Clinpro™ 5000, 1.1% NaF, 3M ESPE, USA); and G4-CO (Control without fluoride, Silica-based dentifrice; Daudt Ltda, Brazil). The specimens were soaked in demineralizing solution for 6 h and remineralizing solution for 18 h alternatively for 10 days. The toothpaste was prepared with deionized water in a 1:3 ratio (w/v) for three minutes daily. The solutions were renewed every 48 h. After cycling, enamel changes were analysed by percentage change of SMH (%SMH) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The %SMH value observed for G3-CLP (2.9 ± 39.2) was higher than that found in G4-CO (-13.0 ± 20.7), G1-MPP (-8.9 ± 20.9) and G2-FD (-3.9 ± 27.1). The %SMH was similar for all treatment groups (one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD; p < .05). The pH, Ca²⁺ and P_total in the remineralization solutions were not different among all groups (Kruskal-Wallis; p < .05). At 24 h, the Ca²⁺ concentration in the demineralization solution was significantly lower in G1-MPP. Ca²⁺ concentration increased in all groups after 48 h, except for G3-CLP. The EDX quantitative analysis showed that the atomic % of elements is lower level at G4-CO.

CONCLUSIONS

The Clinpro™ 5000 demonstrated having the most protective effect against demineralization; however, the % SMH was similar for all groups.

Change of salivary fluoride level with intake of fluoride releasing lozenges: A pilot study

AIM

Long-term, low-level fluoride concentrations in saliva are highly effective in caries prevention and remineralization. The aim of the present two-phased study was to test whether fluoride-releasing lozenges compared to placebo significantly raise salivary fluoride levels above baseline achieved by 1100 ppm fluoride toothpaste in a double-blind, crossover pilot study.

METHODS

In phase 1, a four-arm crossover basic study, four participants used one dissolvable lozenge with .25, 0.5, 1 or 1.5 mg fluoride for 1 hour. In phase 2, the three-arm crossover main study, 11 participants used three lozenges per day for 1 hour for 1 week, establishing long-term salivary fluoride levels dissolving 0 (control), 0.5 and 1.5 mg fluoride lozenges. Saliva was collected at baseline; during lozenge use; 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes later; and early the next morning. Salivary fluoride levels were determined by laboratory diffusion analysis.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 5 minutes after using one lozenge, salivary fluoride levels were above baseline (0.03 ppm), reaching 0.13 ± 0.19 ppm for the 0.25 mg and 0.73 ± 0.75 ppm for the 1.5 mg fluoride lozenge, dropping to baseline after 60 minutes. In phase 2, after 1 week use of 0.5 and 1.5 mg lozenges, respectively, for the 0.5 mg lozenge for 15 minutes and the 1.5 mg lozenge 30 minutes after use, the salivary levels were significantly higher than baseline/control (0.02 ppm). During 1-hour lozenge use, fluoride levels >0.1 ppm were consistently achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoride lozenges achieved elevated salivary fluoride levels during use, but only for short periods after use.

Fluoride in saliva and dental biofilm after 1500 and 5000 ppm fluoride exposure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this randomized, double-blind, crossover study was to measure fluoride in saliva and 7-day-old biofilm fluid and biofilm solids after rinsing three times per day for 3 weeks with 0, 1500, or 5000 ppm fluoride (NaF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the 3-week wash-in/wash-out period, including 1 week of biofilm accumulation, saliva and biofilm samples were collected from 12 participants immediately before (background fluoride), and 10, 30, and 60 min after a single rinse. Biofilm samples were separated into fluid and solids, and samples were analyzed using a fluoride electrode (microanalysis).

RESULTS

The background fluoride concentration was statistically significantly higher in the 5000 compared to the 1500 ppm F rinse group in all three compartments (22.3 and 8.1 μM in saliva, 126.8 and 58.5 μM in biofilm fluid, and 10,940 and 4837 μmol/kg in biofilm solids). The 1-h fluoride accumulation for the 5000 ppm F rinse was higher than for the 1500 ppm F rinse in all three compartments, although not statistically significant for saliva and biofilm solids.

CONCLUSION

Regular exposure to 5000 ppm fluoride elevates background fluoride concentrations in saliva, biofilm fluid, and biofilm solids compared to 1500 ppm fluoride. Increasing the fluoride concentration almost 3.5 times (from 1500 to 5000 ppm) only elevates the background fluoride concentrations in saliva, biofilm fluid, and biofilm solids twofold.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Even though fluoride toothpaste may be diluted by saliva, the results of the present study indicate that use of 5000 ppm fluoride toothpaste might lead to improved caries control.