The Role of Radiotherapy in Acromegaly

Acromegaly in humans and cats: Pathophysiological, clinical and management resemblances and differences

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a disorder associated with excessive levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). In general, GH/IGF-1 excess leads to morphologic craniofacial and acral changes as well as cardiometabolic complications, but the phenotypic changes and clinical presentation of acromegaly differ across species. Here, we review the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of acromegaly in humans and cats, and we provide a systematic comparison between this disease across these different species.

DESIGN

A comprehensive literature review of pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of acromegaly in humans and in cats was performed.

RESULTS

Acromegaly is associated with prominent craniofacial changes in both species: frontal bossing, enlarged nose, ears and lips, and protuberant cheekbones are typically encountered in humans, whereas increased width of the head and skull enlargement are commonly found in cats. Malocclusion, prognathism, dental diastema and upper airway obstruction by soft tissue enlargement are reported in both species, as well as continuous growth and widening of extremities resulting in osteoarticular compromise. Increase of articular joint cartilage thickness, vertebral fractures and spine malalignment is more evident in humans, while arthropathy and spondylosis deformans may also occur in cats. Generalized organomegaly is equally observed in both species. Other similarities between humans and cats with acromegaly include heart failure, ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, and an overall increased cardiometabolic risk. In GH-secreting pituitary tumours, local compressive effects and behavioral changes are mostly observed in humans, but also present in cats. Cutis verticis gyrata and skin tags are exclusively found in humans, while palmigrade/plantigrade stance may occur in some acromegalic cats. Serum IGF-1 is used for acromegaly diagnosis in both species, but an oral glucose tolerance test with GH measurement is only useful in humans, as glucose load does not inhibit GH secretion in cats. Imaging studies are regularly performed in both species after biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly. Hypophysectomy is the first line treatment for humans and cats, although not always available in veterinary medicine.

CONCLUSION

Acromegaly in humans and cats has substantial similarities, as a result of common pathophysiological mechanisms, however species-specific features may be found.

Assessment of multimodal treatment options in recurrent and persistent acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In patients with acromegaly, secondary treatment options in cases of hormonal non-remission or tumor progression include repeat transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), radiation-based treatment (RT), or medical therapy (MT). In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of various second-line treatment options for acromegaly.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guideline, a systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases from conception to the end of 2022. Outcomes of interest included hormonal remission rate, complications, and mortality associated with each treatment modality for refractory acromegaly.

RESULTS

A total of 79 studies including 3,208 refractory acromegaly patients (44.90% males) were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 43.89 years. There was a statistically significant difference between various therapeutic modalities in terms of remission rate, with MT offering the highest remission rate (62.55%), followed by RT (50.15%) and TSS (37.39%). Subgroup analysis of radiotherapeutic and medical modalities did not show a significant difference in remission rate between different kinds of sub-modalities in each treatment approach. Recurrence following secondary treatment was not different in patients treated with reoperation TSS compared to other modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of persistent and recurrent acromegaly optimally requires a multimodal approach. In different scenarios of refractory acromegaly based on previous treatment, secondary treatments may vary in terms of remission rate and complications. Medical agents provide considerable effectiveness as a second-line therapy for recurrent or persistent disease. In selected cases, however, reoperation still provides an opportunity for cure or freedom from medications. The findings of this study may help clinicians to prioritize varying options involved in this multifaceted decision-making process.

Unravelling pituitary tumours in medically treated patients with acromegaly: the impact of systematic MRI reassessment

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, the primary tumor is usually found during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland. A remnant tumor after surgery is, however, harder to depict. When a tumor is missed, the remaining option is usually lifelong pharmacological treatment.

PURPOSE

To identify tumors by reassessment of all available MRI scans in pharmacologically treated patients, operated or not, and to compare our results with the routine MRI reports.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with acromegaly and managed at a tertiary care center between 2005 and 2021 and currently on pharmacological treatment were included. MRI scans were evaluated in a standardized manner and classified independently by a radiologist and an endocrinologist into "certain," "suspected," or "no tumor." In case of disagreement, consensus was achieved with a senior neuroradiologist. The results were compared using the clinical radiologists' routine MRI reports.

RESULTS

We identified certain and suspected tumors in 29/74 and 36/74 patients, respectively. No tumor was identified in nine patients. In five of these, no MRI contrast agent was given. Discrepancy between our results and the routine MRI reports was found in 31/74 patients (P = 0.01). In 22 patients, the routine reports described no tumor while we identified certain tumors in 2/22 patients and suspected tumors in 13/22 patients.

CONCLUSION

In most patients with pharmacologically treated acromegaly, we identified a certain or suspected pituitary tumor. These findings were more frequent compared to the routine MRI reports. Based on our results, patients will be considered for a change in long-term treatment modality.

Approach to the Patient With Treatment-resistant Acromegaly

Although most tumors in patients with acromegaly are benign and are cured or controlled by surgery and/or first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands therapy, some can behave more aggressively and are resistant to these standard therapies. Acromegaly, if left untreated, is a rare and chronic disorder, commonly caused by a GH-producing pituitary adenoma and is associated with significant comorbidities and an increased mortality. Transsphenoidal surgery is considered the mainstay of acromegaly management, but medical therapy has an increasingly important role. However, disease activity is not fully controlled in a significant number of patients treated with surgery and/or high-dose first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand monotherapy. In these circumstances, therefore, repeated surgery, second-line medical therapy, and radiotherapy, alone or combined as multimodal therapeutic strategies should be considered, in a patient-centered perspective.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a disease characterized by elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Surgery is the only curative treatment, while medical therapies are administered life-long. To date, almost 30% of patients treated with the currently available medical therapies do not achieve biochemical control.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on new drugs in development for acromegaly. In detail, we provide an overview of the new molecules designed to improve disease control rate (such as novel somotostatin receptor ligands and antisense oligonucleotides), as well as the new formulations of existing medications aiming to improve patients' compliance (e.g. oral or long-acting subcutaneous octreotide).

EXPERT OPINION

The constant progresses in the medical treatment of acromegaly could lead to an individualized therapy based on tumor, as well as patient's characteristics. Besides disease control, patient's need represents a major target of medical treatment in chronic diseases such as acromegaly, in order to improve compliance to therapy and patients' quality of life.

Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) normalization with long-term multimodality therapy in a pituitary center and to assess changes over time.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly (N = 409), with ≥1 year of data after surgery and at least 2 subsequent clinic visits were included in long-term analysis (N = 266). Biochemical data, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic interventions were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, mean [standard deviation] age was 43.4 [14.3] years, body mass index was 28.5 (24.9-32.1) kg/m2 (median, interquartile range), serum IGF-1 index (IGF-1 level/upper limit of normal) was 2.3 [1.7-3.1], and 80.5% had macroadenomas. Patients with transsphenoidal surgery after 2006 were older [46.6 ± 14.3 vs 40.0 ± 13.4 years; P < 0.001]. Age and tumor size correlated inversely. Overall (N = 266), 93.2% achieved a normal IGF-1 level during 9.9 [5.0-15.0] years with multimodality therapy. The interval to first normal IGF-1 level following failed surgical remission was shorter after 2006: 14.0 (95% confidence interval, 10.0-20.0) versus 27.5 (22.0-36.0) months (P = 0.002). Radiation therapy and second surgery were rarer after 2006: 28 (22%) versus 62 (47.0%); P < 0.001 and 12 (9.4%) versus 28 (21.2%); P = 0.010, respectively. Age at diagnosis increased over time periods, possibly reflecting increased detection of acromegaly in older patients with milder disease. Male gender, older age, smaller tumor and lower IGF-1 index at diagnosis predicted long-term sustained IGF-1 control after surgery without adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of patients with acromegaly can be biochemically controlled with multimodality therapy in the current era. Radiotherapy and repeat pituitary surgery became less frequently utilized over time. Long-term postoperative IGF-1 control without use of adjuvant therapies has improved.

The position of combined medical treatment in acromegaly

Advances in combination medical treatment have offer new perspectives for acromegaly patients with persistent disease activity despite receiving the available medical monotherapies. The outcomes of combination medical treatment may reflect both additive and synergistic effects. This review focuses on combination medical treatment and its current position in acromegaly, based on clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined medical treatment(s) and our own experiences with combination therapy. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):646-52.

How to Position Pasireotide LAR Treatment in Acromegaly

CONTEXT

Pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) is a somatostatin multireceptor ligand, and in the current consensus criteria pasireotide LAR is considered the second-line medical treatment for acromegaly. We present in this article our recommendations to define the position of pasireotide LAR in the treatment of acromegaly and provide recommendations for the management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Our recommendations are based on our experiences with the pasireotide LAR and pegvisomant (PEGV) combination study and the available basic or clinical articles published in peer-reviewed international journals on pasireotide LAR and acromegaly.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In accordance with the current consensus criteria, we recommend pasireotide LAR monotherapy as a second-line therapy in young patients who show tumor growth during first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy and in patients who show tumor growth during PEGV therapy. In addition, we recommend pasireotide LAR monotherapy in patients with headache not responsive to first-generation SRL therapy and in patients who experience side effects or are intolerant to PEGV monotherapy. In contrast to the current consensus criteria, we recommend considering combination therapy with pasireotide LAR and PEGV as third-line treatment in patients without diabetes at low PEGV dosages (≤80 mg/week) and in patients with tumor growth or symptoms of active acromegaly during first-generation SRL and PEGV combination therapy. With respect to pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia, we recommend a more liberal strategy of blood glucose monitoring during pasireotide treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the current consensus criteria, we recommend a more reluctant use of pasireotide LAR therapy for the treatment of acromegaly.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is characterized by increased release of growth hormone and, consequently, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1), most often by a pituitary adenoma. Prolonged exposure to excess hormone leads to progressive somatic disfigurement and a wide range of systemic manifestations that are associated with increased mortality. Although considered a rare disease, recent studies have reported an increased incidence of acromegaly owing to better disease awareness, improved diagnostic tools and perhaps a real increase in prevalence. Acromegaly treatment approaches, which include surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy, have changed considerably over time owing to improved surgical procedures, development of new radiotherapy techniques and availability of new medical therapies. The optimal use of these treatments will reduce mortality in patients with acromegaly to levels in the general population. Medical therapy is currently an important treatment option and can even be the first-line treatment in patients with acromegaly who will not benefit from or are not suitable for first-line neurosurgical treatment. Pharmacological treatments include somatostatin receptor ligands (such as octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide), dopamine agonists and the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In this Primer, we review the main aspects of acromegaly, including scientific advances that underlie expanding knowledge of disease pathogenesis, improvements in disease management and new medical therapies that are available and in development to improve disease control.

Malaysian Consensus Statement for the Diagnosis and Management of Acromegaly

In Malaysia, acromegaly is under-recognised with only 10-15% of the expected number of cases from prevalence estimates, having been diagnosed and managed in established endocrine centres with access to multidisciplinary care. This is mainly due to lack of awareness and standardised approach in diagnosing this disease resulting in delay in diagnosis and management with suboptimal treatment outcomes. This first Malaysian consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly addresses these issues and is based on current best practices and latest available evidence so as to reduce the disease burden on acromegaly patients managed in the Malaysian healthcare system.

Machine Learning-Based Radiomics Predicts Radiotherapeutic Response in Patients With Acromegaly

Background: Prediction of radiotherapeutic response before radiotherapy could help determine individual treatment strategies for patients with acromegaly. Objective: To develop and validate a machine-learning-based multiparametric MRI radiomics model to non-invasively predict radiotherapeutic response in patients with acromegaly. Methods: This retrospective study included 57 acromegaly patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy between January 2008 and January 2016. Manual lesion segmentation and radiomics analysis were performed on each pituitary adenoma, and 1561 radiomics features were extracted from each sequence. A radiomics signature was built with a support vector machine using leave-one-out cross-validation for feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to select appropriate clinicopathological features to construct a clinical model, which was then combined with the radiomics signature to construct a radiomics model. The performance of this radiomic model was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and its calibration, discriminating ability, clinical usefulness. Results: At 3-years after radiotherapy, 25 patients had achieved remission and 32 patients had not. The clinical model incorporating seven clinical features had an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.86 for predicting radiotherapeutic response, and performed better than any single clinical feature. The radiomics signature constructed with six radiomics features had a significantly higher AUC of 0.92. The radiomics model showed good discrimination abilities and calibration, with an AUC of 0.96. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the radiomics model. Conclusion: Using pre-radiotherapy clinical and MRI data, we developed a radiomics model with favorable performance for individualized non-invasive prediction of radiotherapeutic response, which may help in identifying acromegaly patients who are likely to benefit from radiotherapy.

Pegvisomant Treatment in Acromegaly

Historically, medical treatment of acromegaly has mainly been used as an adjuvant therapy after surgery. In the last decades, an increased range of medical therapy options has been available. Somatostatin analogues have become the cornerstones of medical treatment in acromegaly and are even seen as a primary treatment in a selected group of acromegaly patients. The most recent medical treatment available for acromegaly patients is pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. To date, it is the most effective medical treatment, but it is costly. Pegvisomant is used as monotherapy and combined with somatostatin analogues. In this article, we review clinical studies and cohorts that have documented the efficacy of pegvisomant monotherapy and combined therapy and give a concise overview of associated side effects.

Quality of Life in Acromegaly

Available disease-specific questionnaires like the Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire have confirmed that quality of life (QoL) is impaired in acromegaly, especially in active disease. Successful therapy improves QoL, but it may not normalize completely even after endocrine cure; furthermore, there is not always a correlation between growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 and subjective health perception of QoL. Appearance is the dimension most affected and has the highest impact on the patient's QoL. Worse QoL is associated with the presence of musculoskeletal pain, headache (if only medical therapy, not surgery, has been provided), having required treatment with radiotherapy, being older, of female gender, with a longer disease duration, coexisting diabetes mellitus, a higher BMI or becoming GH deficient after treatment for acromegaly.

MEN1, MEN4, and Carney Complex: Pathology and Molecular Genetics

Pituitary adenomas are a common feature of a subset of endocrine neoplasia syndromes, which have otherwise highly variable disease manifestations. We provide here a review of the clinical features and human molecular genetics of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1 and 4 (MEN1 and MEN4, respectively) and Carney complex (CNC). MEN1, MEN4, and CNC are hereditary autosomal dominant syndromes that can present with pituitary adenomas. MEN1 is caused by inactivating mutations in the MEN1 gene, whose product menin is involved in multiple intracellular pathways contributing to transcriptional control and cell proliferation. MEN1 clinical features include primary hyperparathyroidism, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and prolactinomas as well as other pituitary adenomas. A subset of patients with pituitary adenomas and other MEN1 features have mutations in the CDKN1B gene; their disease has been called MEN4. Inactivating mutations in the type 1α regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (PKA; the PRKAR1A gene), that lead to dysregulation and activation of the PKA pathway, are the main genetic cause of CNC, which is clinically characterised by primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, spotty skin pigmentation (lentigines), cardiac and other myxomas and acromegaly due to somatotropinomas or somatotrope hyperplasia.

Treatment Factors That Influence Mortality in Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare condition characterized by excessive secretion of growth hormone (GH), which is almost always due to a pituitary adenoma. Acromegaly is associated with significant morbidity such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, cardiomyopathy, obstructive sleep apnoea, malignancy and musculoskeletal abnormalities. Acromegaly has also been associated with increased mortality in several retrospective studies. This review will focus on the epidemiological data relating to mortality rates in acromegaly, the relationship between acromegaly and malignancy, the role of GH and insulin-like growth factor-I in assessing the risk of future mortality, and the impact of radiotherapy and hypopituitarism on mortality.

Bone and Joint Disorders in Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a chronic, progressive disease caused by a growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma, resulting in elevated GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 concentrations. Following appropriate therapy (surgery, radiotherapy and/or medical treatment), many systemic GH-induced comorbid conditions improve considerably. Unfortunately, despite biochemical control, acromegaly patients suffer from a high prevalence of late manifestations of transient GH excess, significantly impairing their quality of life. In this overview article, we summarize the pathophysiology, diagnosis, clinical picture, disease course and management of skeletal complications of acromegaly, focusing on vertebral fractures and arthropathy.

Cardiovascular Disease and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Acromegaly

Treatment goals in acromegaly include symptom relief, tumour control and reversal of the excess morbidity and mortality associated with the disorder. Cardiovascular complications include concentric biventricular hypertrophy and cardiomyopathy, hypertension, valvular heart disease and arrhythmias, while metabolic disturbance (insulin resistance/diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia) further increases the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Sleep-disordered breathing (in the form of sleep apnoea) is also common in patients with acromegaly and may exacerbate cardiovascular dysfunction, in addition to contributing to impaired quality of life. Accordingly, and in keeping with evidence that cardiorespiratory complications in acromegaly are not automatically reversed/ameliorated simply through the attainment of 'safe' growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, recent guidelines have emphasised the need not only to achieve stringent biochemical control, but also to identify and independently treat these comorbidities. It is important, therefore, that patients with acromegaly are systematically screened at diagnosis, and periodically thereafter, for the common cardiovascular and respiratory manifestations and that biochemical targets do not become the only treatment goal.

Medical Treatment of Acromegaly with Dopamine Agonists or Somatostatin Analogs

Treatment of acromegaly aims to correct (or prevent) tumor compression of surrounding tissues by excising the disease-causing lesion and reduce growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 levels to normal values. When surgery (the usual first-line treatment) fails to correct GH/IGF-1 hypersecretion, medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs; particularly cabergoline) or somatostatin analogs (SAs) can be used. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is helpful in patients who are totally or partially resistant to SAs and can be given in association with both SAs and/or DAs. Thanks to this multistep therapeutic strategy, adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most patients, giving them normal life expectancy. Comorbidities associated with acromegaly generally improve after treatment, but persistent sequelae may nonetheless impair quality of life.

Novel Techniques in the Surgical Treatment of Acromegaly: Applications and Efficacy

Since the establishment of transsphenoidal microsurgery as the operative treatment of choice in most patients with acromegaly 40 years ago, a few novel technical developments have evolved. Their application, utility and efficacy will be briefly discussed in this review article, based on an analysis of published results and the authors' personal experience. The endoscope was additionally used to search for residual tumours in locations which could not be visualised with the operating microscope. In many centres it has by now fully replaced the operating microscope. Extended endoscopic operations hardly have limits in respect to accessible pathology. Overall, the results and complications reported from microsurgical and endoscopic series are comparable. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging allows depicting the completeness of a tumour resection. While in many patients additional tumour resections are performed on the basis of intraoperative imaging, the improvements in hormonal remission rates reported are less impressive. Neuronavigation uses imaging data to improve the surgeon's orientation, and it is certainly a major asset to the inexperienced. In high-caseload centres it is mainly appreciated in anatomical variants and reoperations. While the Doppler probe is a valuable and easily affordable gadget to avoid vascular arterial injury, intraoperative ultrasound imaging of tumour extension has a much poorer resolution than magnetic resonance imaging and is thus not widely implemented. The clinical value of intraoperative growth hormone measurements is controversially discussed. In summary, the application of modern technology has only led to a minor improvement of results, but it has widened the spectrum of accessible pathologies and increased the safety of the procedures for the patient. It is expected that outcomes will continue to improve as novel techniques and concepts are being developed.