[Treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorders: recommendations of the revised S3 guidelines on obsessive-compulsive disorders]

In 2022, the first revised version of the S3 guidelines on obsessive-compulsive disorder will be published under the auspices of the German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN). This article contains a summary of the most important recommendations for therapy in a condensed form. There were no major changes in the central basic therapy recommendations compared with the first version of the guidelines, as the evidence base has not fundamentally changed since then. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure and response management is the most effective form of therapy for this clinical picture and therefore the therapy of first choice. Regarding pharmacotherapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the first-line medications. They are indicated when CBT with exposure is not available or has not been effective, when CBT is rejected by the patient and in the patient's personal preference for medication, or to increase the readiness for CBT with exposure. New recommendations include, e.g., the use of Internet therapy, and recommendations for the use of CBT and exposure, e.g., also in group format, including video conferencing if appropriate as well as in intensive format.

Praxisorientierte Forschung in der Psychotherapie

Zusammenfassung. In den letzten Jahrzehnten hat sich durch randomisiert-kontrollierte Studien (RCTs) eine breite Evidenzbasis von Psychotherapie mit mittleren bis großen Effekten für verschiedene psychische Störungen gebildet. Neben der Bestimmung dieser Wirksamkeit („Efficacy“) ebneten Studien zur Wirksamkeit unter alltäglichen Routinebedingungen („Effectiveness“) historisch den Weg zur Entwicklung eines praxisorientierten Forschungsparadigmas. Im Beitrag wird argumentiert, dass im Rahmen dieses Paradigmas praxisbasierte Studien eine wertvolle Ergänzung zu RCTs darstellen, da sie existierende Probleme in der Psychotherapieforschung adressieren können. In der gegenwärtigen praxisorientierten Forschung liefern dabei neue Ansätze aus der personalisierten Medizin und Methoden aus der ‚Computational Psychiatry‘ wichtige Anhaltspunkte zur Optimierung von Effekten in der Psychotherapie. Im Kontext der Personalisierung werden bspw. klinische multivariable Prädiktionsmodelle entwickelt, welche durch Rückmeldeschleifen an Praktiker_innen kurzfristig ein evidenzbasiertes Outcome-Monitoring ermöglicht und langfristig das Praxis-Forschungsnetzwerk in Deutschland stärkt. Am Ende des Beitrags werden zukünftige Richtungen für die praxisorientierte Forschung im Sinne des ‘Precision Mental Health Care’ -Paradigmas abgeleitet und diskutiert.

Determining prognostic variables of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder: effectiveness and its predictors in routine clinical care

The objectives of this study were to investigate the naturalistic effectiveness of routine inpatient treatment for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and to identify predictors of treatment outcome. A routinely collected data set of 1,596 OCD inpatients (M = 33.9 years, SD = 11.7; 60.4% female) having received evidence-based psychotherapy based on the cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in five German psychotherapeutic clinics was analyzed. Effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated for several outcome variables to determine effectiveness. Predictor analyses were performed on a subsample (N = 514; M = 34.3 years, SD = 12.2; 60.3% female). For this purpose, the number of potential predictors was reduced using factor analysis, followed by multiple regression analysis to identify robust predictors. Effect sizes of various outcome variables could be classified as large (g = 1.34 of OCD-symptom change). Predictors of changes in OCD and depressive symptoms were symptom severity at admission and general psychopathological distress. In addition, patients with higher social support and more washing compulsions benefited more from treatment. Subgroup analyses showed a distinct predictor profile of changes in compulsions and obsessions. The results indicate that an evidence-based psychotherapy program for OCD can be effectively implemented in routine inpatient care. In addition to well-established predictors, social support, and washing compulsions in particular were identified as important positive predictors. Specific predictor profiles for changes in obsessions and compulsions are discussed.

Die Rolle von Verhaltensexperimenten in der Behandlung von Zwangsstörungen: Ein Update zur effektiven Gestaltung und Durchführung in der Praxis

Das Ziel des Artikels ist es, den neuesten Stand zum effektiven Einsatz von Verhaltensexperimenten im Rahmen der Psychotherapie für Zwangsstörungen darzulegen. Dazu werden im ersten Teil die evidenzbasierten Psychotherapien zur Behandlung von Zwangsstörungen vorgestellt sowie die Probleme bei der Implementierung dieser Verfahren aufgezeigt. Dabei zeigt sich, dass trotz der guten Evidenzlage die Verfahren zu selten eingesetzt werden und so die Forschungs-Praxis-Lücke fördern. Im Anschluss werden die zugrundeliegenden Rationale zur Durchführung von Verhaltensexperimenten erläutert, in Bezug zu aktuellen Forschungsarbeiten gestellt und damit die Bedeutung von Verhaltensexperimenten in der Therapie von Zwangsstörungen unterstrichen. Daraus werden Empfehlungen für die effektive Umsetzung von Verhaltensexperimenten in der Praxis abgeleitet. Die Funktionsanalyse der zwangsspezifischen Symptomatik stellt das zentrale Element im Rahmen der Behandlung von Zwangsstörungen dar. Dabei müssen die Verhaltensexperimente an die individuell befürchtete Konsequenz bei Unterlassen von Ritualen und Sicherheitsverhalten (d.h. die furchtbasierte Überzeugung) ausgerichtet sein, um eine maximale Erwartungsverletzung zu ermöglichen. Klinische Fallbeispiele werden skizziert, anhand deren effektive Verhaltensexperimente anschaulich und praxisnah dargestellt werden. Abschließend werden noch Hinweise, Tipps und Fallstricke für Praktiker zur Durchführung von effektiven Verhaltensexperimenten beleuchtet und die Grenzen von Verhaltensexperimenten benannt.

The Metacognitive Training for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A pilot study

More than 50% of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not receive first-line psychological treatment such as cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention. To narrow this treatment gap, there is an urgent need for therapies that are easy to disseminate and highly accepted by patients. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Group Training for OCD (MCT-OCD). Fifty patients with OCD participated in the MCT-OCD for 4 weeks during their inpatient stay in a single-arm pilot trial. Patients were assessed before and after the intervention and filled out an online survey 6 months after post assessment. Results showed a decrease in obsessive compulsive symptoms according to the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (primary outcome) from baseline to post assessment with a large effect size. Symptom reduction remained stable over 6 months and was positively correlated with appraisal ratings of the training. The reduction in frequency of obsessive compulsive symptoms, distress due to obsessive compulsive symptoms, cognitive biases, and depressive symptoms remained stable over 6 months after the intervention. Our findings tentatively imply that the MCT-OCD is a promising treatment for OCD patients. A randomized controlled trial is thus warranted to further clarify the efficacy of the MCT-OCD. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00012531), date of registration: 16.06.2017.

Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A high number of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not receive cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention, which is the most effective treatment for OCD. Therefore, Metacognitive Training for OCD (MCT-OCD) was developed, which is a structured group therapy aiming at the modification of dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases, beliefs and coping styles. It can be administered by less trained personnel, thus may reach a higher number of patients. An uncontrolled pilot study (MCT-OCD pilot version) provided first evidence that the training is highly accepted by patients; OC symptoms decreased with a high effect size (η2partial = 0.50). The aim of the present study is to address the shortcomings of the pilot study (e.g., no control group) and to assess the efficacy of the revised version of the MCT-OCD in the framework of a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Eighty patients with OCD will be recruited. After a blinded assessment at baseline (-t1), patients will be randomly assigned either to the intervention group (MCT-OCD; n = 40) or to a care as usual control group (n = 40). The MCT-OCD aims to enhance patients' metacognitive competence in eight modules by addressing dysfunctional (meta-)cognitive biases and beliefs associated with OCD (e.g., intolerance of uncertainty). After 8 weeks, patients will be invited to a post assessment (t1), and then they will receive a follow-up online questionnaire 3 months following t1 (t2). The primary outcome is the Y-BOCS total score, and the secondary outcomes include the HDRS, OCI-R, OBQ-44, MCQ-30, WHOQOL-BREF, BDI-II, and subjective appraisal ratings of the MCT-OCD. We expect that OC symptoms will decrease more in the intervention group compared with the care as usual control group from -t1 to t1 and that treatment gains will be maintained until t2.

DISCUSSION

The planned study is the first to investigate the MCT-OCD, a promising new treatment, in a randomized controlled trial. The MCT-OCD may help to overcome existing treatment barriers for patients with OCD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Registry for Clinical Studies ( DRKS00013539 ), 22.02.2018.

"Phobie à deux" and other reasons why clinicians do not apply exposure with response prevention in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Meta-analyses suggest that exposure with response prevention (ERP) is the most efficacious treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and treatment guidelines for the disorder accordingly recommend ERP. Despite this, many therapists, including those with a cognitive-behavioral therapeutic background, do not perform ERP in patients with OCD. The present study aimed to elucidate the reasons why. German therapists (N = 216) completed an anonymous online survey, the newly developed Reasons for Not Performing Exposure in OCD Scale (REPEX), that inquired whether, to what extent, and how they perform ERP in the treatment of OCD. We also asked their reasons for not applying ERP in the past. Most therapists considered ERP an efficient treatment for OCD. Marked differences emerged between physicians and psychologists, however. The former used exposure less often and for a shorter period, preferred in sensu to in vivo exposure, and conducted exposure less often in the personal environment of the patient than did psychologists. Both groups were familiar with clinical guidelines to a similar extent. A factor analysis of the REPEX scale revealed five factors. Patient lack of motivation, preference for exposure to be self-help as well as alleged organizational difficulties were endorsed most often. The latter was correlated with the age of the therapist and was far more often affirmed by physicians. Fear of side effects was named by a subgroup of clinicians; in the context of patient ambivalence, this may foster "phobie à deux". Unlike prior research, lack of expertise was rarely identified as a reason not to use ERP. Recommendations for improving adherence to guidelines are discussed.