1
|
Shi Y, Wang H, Golijanin B, Amin A, Lee J, Sikov M, Hyams E, Pareek G, Carneiro BA, Mega AE, Lagos GG, Wang L, Wang Z, Cheng L. Ductal, intraductal, and cribriform carcinoma of the prostate: Molecular characteristics and clinical management. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:144-154. [PMID: 38485644 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
Prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma accounts for approximately 95% of prostate cancer (CaP) cases. The remaining 5% of histologic subtypes of CaP are known to be more aggressive and have recently garnered substantial attention. These histologic subtypes - namely, prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), and cribriform carcinoma of the prostate (CC-P) - typically exhibit distinct growth characteristics, genomic features, and unique oncologic outcomes. For example, PTEN mutations, which cause uncontrolled cell growth, are frequently present in IDC-P and CC-P. Germline mutations in homologous DNA recombination repair (HRR) genes (e.g., BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2) are discovered in 40% of patients with IDC-P, while only 9% of patients without ductal involvement had a germline mutation. CC-P is associated with deletions in common tumor suppressor genes, including PTEN, TP53, NKX3-1, MAP3K7, RB1, and CHD1. Evidence suggests abiraterone may be superior to docetaxel as a first-line treatment for patients with IDC-P. To address these and other critical pathological attributes, this review examines the molecular pathology, genetics, treatments, and oncologic outcomes associated with CC-P, PDA, and IDC-P with the objective of creating a comprehensive resource with a centralized repository of information on PDA, IDC-P, and CC-P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibo Shi
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hanzhang Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, CT
| | - Borivoj Golijanin
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ali Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery (Urology), Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Health, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Joanne Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery (Urology), Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Health, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Mark Sikov
- Department of Internal Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence RI
| | - Elias Hyams
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Benedito A Carneiro
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI
| | - Anthony E Mega
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI
| | - Galina G Lagos
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI
| | - Lisha Wang
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zhiping Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery (Urology), Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Health, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kawamura H, Nakamura K, Yoshioka Y, Itasaka S, Tomita N, Onishi M, Iwata H, Aizawa T, Kikuchi K, Nagata K, Nakamura K, Nishioka K, Ishiyama H, Ueno S, Kokubo M, Yamazaki H, Watanabe K, Toyoda T, Akimoto T. Radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma of the prostate: an analysis based on the Japanese radiation oncology study group survey. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:146-152. [PMID: 36478251 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical characteristics of prostate ductal carcinoma is still unclear, and treatment strategy has not yet been established due to its rarity. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter survey of radiation therapy for prostate ductal carcinoma in Japan. METHOD Data of patients with ductal carcinoma of the prostate treated with radiation therapy between 1996 and 2018 were extracted from the database of each facility. RESULTS Fifty-two treatment records of 41 patients were collected from nine institutions. The treatment purpose and situations were varied curative intent to palliation. Twenty-eight patients received curative treatments. The median follow-up period of these patients was 68 months. Androgen deprivation therapy was combined with radiation therapy in 26 cases (93%). X-ray and particle irradiation was used. Radiation dose range was 63-78 Gy; 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival and biochemical relapse-free survival were 87.0, 79.3 and 79.3%, respectively. One patient experienced Grade 3 radiation proctitis and one experienced Grade 3 radiation cystitis. There were no Grade 4 or worse adverse events. CONCLUSION Most patient received similar treatment with adenocarcinoma of prostate, and the clinical results were compatible. For more reliable evidence, further studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katsumasa Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yasuo Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Itasaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takuya Aizawa
- Department of Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koyo Kikuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Kenji Nagata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ishikiriseiki Hospital, Higashi-Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyonao Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nishioka
- Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ishiyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shuichi Ueno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masaki Kokubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenta Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Toyoda
- Department of Radiology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate or seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma: An multi-disciplinary team (MDT) case report and literature review. Curr Urol 2022; 16:107-113. [PMID: 36570360 PMCID: PMC9782353 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We introduced a 61-year-old male with ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate who underwent a tortuous diagnosis and treatment. Multi-disciplinary team meetings organized by our hospital have shown great value in the whole process. The patient presented with gross hematuria accompanied by frequent urination initially, and was diagnosed with ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate involving right seminal vesicle gland and urethra by urethroscopy biopsy. The clinical stage of tumor was T3bN0M0. After 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the tumor shrank significantly and the patient underwent a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. But the patient declined to continue chemotherapy postoperatively. After 10 months, the serum prostatic specific antigen increased to 0.05 ng/mL, and multiple metastases were found in the patient's bilateral lungs. However, an unexpected diagnosis of seminal vesicle adenocarcinoma was put forward from another hospital after supplementary pathologic immunohistochemical examination. Then, after careful discussion and demonstration by our multi-disciplinary team experts, we insisted on the diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate and suggested that the original regimen of chemotherapy should be continued. Up-to-date, 14 months after the operation, the patient continues to survive while undergoing ongoing active treatment as recommended.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lawrence MG, Porter LH, Clouston D, Murphy DG, Frydenberg M, Taylor RA, Risbridger GP. Knowing what's growing: Why ductal and intraductal prostate cancer matter. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/533/eaaz0152. [PMID: 32132214 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz0152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy, but only some tumors are lethal. Accurately identifying these tumors will improve clinical practice and instruct research. Aggressive cancers often have distinctive pathologies, including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and ductal adenocarcinoma. Here, we review the importance of these pathologies because they are often overlooked, especially in genomics and preclinical testing. Pathology, genomics, and patient-derived models show that IDC-P and ductal adenocarcinoma accompany multiple markers of poor prognosis. Consequently, "knowing what is growing" will help translate preclinical research to pinpoint and treat high-risk prostate cancer in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell G Lawrence
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Laura H Porter
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | | | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.,Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Department of Urology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia
| | - Renea A Taylor
- Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Gail P Risbridger
- Monash Partners Comprehensive Cancer Consortium, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute Cancer Program, Prostate Cancer Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia. .,Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ranasinghe W, Shapiro DD, Zhang M, Bathala T, Navone N, Thompson TC, Broom B, Aparicio A, Tu SM, Tang C, Davis JW, Pisters L, Chapin BF. Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:337-358. [PMID: 33824525 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00447-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is the most common variant histological subtype of prostate carcinoma and has an aggressive clinical course. DAC is usually characterized and treated as high-risk prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (PAC). However, DAC has a different biology to that of acinar disease, which often poses a challenge for both diagnosis and management. DAC can be difficult to identify using conventional diagnostic modalities such as serum PSA levels and multiparametric MRI, and the optimal management for localized DAC is unknown owing to the rarity of the disease. Following definitive therapy for localized disease with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, the majority of DACs recur with visceral metastases at low PSA levels. Various systemic therapies that have been shown to be effective in high-risk PAC have limited use in treating DAC. Although current understanding of the biology of DAC is limited, genomic analyses have provided insights into the pathology behind its aggressive behaviour and potential future therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weranja Ranasinghe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Daniel D Shapiro
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tharakeswara Bathala
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nora Navone
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy C Thompson
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bradley Broom
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Louis Pisters
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian F Chapin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yahaya JJ. Advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a 71-year old male: A case report and literature review. HUMAN PATHOLOGY: CASE REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ehpc.2020.200431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
7
|
Ranasinghe WKB, Brooks NA, Elsheshtawi MA, Davis JW, Bathala TK, Tang C, Troncoso P, Aparicio A, Tu SM, Pisters LL, Chapin BF. Patterns of metastases of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer 2020; 126:3667-3673. [PMID: 32453443 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to investigate the patterns of metastases in men with metastatic prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) and recurrence patterns after therapy. METHODS All patients with a new diagnosis of DAC with de novo metastases and those with localized disease who developed metastases after treatment and were treated at the study institution from January 2005 to November 2018 were included. All patient and tumor characteristics and outcome data were collected. RESULTS A total of 164 patients (37.7%) had metastatic DAC, including 112 with de novo metastases and 52 who developed metastases after treatment. Men with de novo metastases were found to have a significantly higher median prostate-specific antigen level and International Society of Urological Pathology grade but a lower cT3 and/or T4 classification compared with those with metastases that developed after treatment (all P < .05). Approximately 87% of men with de novo metastases progressed despite multiple systemic therapies, 37.6% required intervention for the palliation of symptoms, and 10.1% responded to systemic therapy and underwent treatment of the primary tumor. Men with de novo metastatic DAC and those who developed metastases after treatment had multiple metastatic sites (including bone and viscera), with higher rates of lung metastases noted in the posttreatment group (23.2% vs 44.2%; P = .01). A total of 45 patients who were treated with curative intent developed metastases at a median of 22 months (range, 0.9-74.8 months) after treatment, at low prostate-specific antigen levels (median, 4.4 ng/mL [interquartile range, 1.7-11.1 ng/mL]). CONCLUSIONS The current study described the metastatic patterns of DAC in both patients with de novo metastatic disease and those who later progress to metastases. Men receiving treatment for DAC with curative intent require stringent long-term follow-up with imaging modalities, including chest imaging given the predilection toward lung metastases noted among these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weranja K B Ranasinghe
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nathan A Brooks
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed A Elsheshtawi
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patricia Troncoso
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shi-Ming Tu
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Louis L Pisters
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian F Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DiIenno N, Edwards DC, McGreen B, Levy J, Zheng H, Foote C, Nordsiek MF, Mapow B, May NR, Amster MI. Locally Metastatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: A Therapeutic and Prognostic Dilemma. Urology 2018; 122:10-12. [PMID: 30171919 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole DiIenno
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel C Edwards
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Urology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Brian McGreen
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Urology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jason Levy
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Urology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Hianqiao Zheng
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher Foote
- Department of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Beth Mapow
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Pathology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Noah R May
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Urology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melanie I Amster
- Hahnemann University Hospital, Department of Urology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|