Assessment of the Correlation between Endoscopic Activity and Histological Activity in Ulcerative Colitis Patients

Advanced technology for assessment of endoscopic and histological activity in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Advanced endoscopic technologies led to significant progress in the definition of endoscopic remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) and correlate better with histological changes, compared with standard endoscopy. However, while studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of endoscope technologies individually, there are currently limited data comparing between technologies. As such, the aim of this systematic review was to pool data from the existing literature and compare the correlations between endoscopy and histologic disease activity scores across endoscope technologies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase until February 2021 for eligible studies reporting the correlation between endoscopy and histology activity scores in UC. Studies were grouped by endoscope technology as standard-definition white light (SD-WLE), high-definition white light (HD-WLE) or electronic virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) and comparisons made between these groups.

RESULTS

A total of N = 27 studies were identified, of which N = 12 were included in a meta-analysis of correlations between endoscopic and histological activity scores. Combining these studies identified considerable heterogeneity (I ²: 89-93%) and returned a pooled correlation coefficient (ρ) for the SD-WLE group of 0.74, which did not differ significantly from HD-WLE (ρ: 0.65, p = 0.521) or VCE (ρ: 0.70, p = 0.801). In addition, N = 4 studies reported the accuracy of endoscopic activity scores on WLE and VCE to diagnose histological remission. Pooling these found significantly higher accuracy for VCE, compared with WLE [risk ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.19, p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Activity scores assessed using endoscopy are strongly correlated with activity on histology regardless of endoscopic technology. VCE seems to be more accurate in predicting histological remission than WLE. However, given the heterogeneity between the included studies, head-to-head trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE suggests performing segmental biopsies (at least two from each segment), which should be placed in different specimen containers (ileum, cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and rectum) in patients with clinical and endoscopic signs of colitis.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends taking two biopsies from the right hemicolon (ascending and transverse colon) and, in a separate container, two biopsies from the left hemicolon (descending and sigmoid colon) when microscopic colitis is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends pancolonic dye-based chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies of any visible lesions during surveillance endoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 4: ESGE suggests that, in high risk patients with a history of colonic neoplasia, tubular-appearing colon, strictures, ongoing therapy-refractory inflammation, or primary sclerosing cholangitis, chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies can be combined with four-quadrant non-targeted biopsies every 10 cm along the colon. Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, if pouch surveillance for dysplasia is performed, visible abnormalities should be biopsied, with at least two biopsies systematically taken from each of the afferent ileal loop, the efferent blind loop, the pouch, and the anorectal cuff.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends that, in patients with known ulcerative colitis and endoscopic signs of inflammation, at least two biopsies be obtained from the worst affected areas for the assessment of activity or the presence of cytomegalovirus; for those with no evident endoscopic signs of inflammation, advanced imaging technologies may be useful in identifying areas for targeted biopsies to assess histologic remission if this would have therapeutic consequences. Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 7: ESGE suggests not biopsying endoscopically visible inflammation or normal-appearing mucosa to assess disease activity in known Crohn's disease.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that adequately assessed colorectal polyps that are judged to be premalignant should be fully excised rather than biopsied.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends that, where endoscopically feasible, potentially malignant colorectal polyps should be excised en bloc rather than being biopsied. If the endoscopist cannot confidently perform en bloc excision at that time, careful representative images (rather than biopsies) should be taken of the potential focus of cancer, and the patient should be rescheduled or referred to an expert center.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends that, in malignant lesions not amenable to endoscopic excision owing to deep invasion, six carefully targeted biopsies should be taken from the potential focus of cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

The endoscopic diagnosis of mucosal healing and deep remission in inflammatory bowel disease

The therapeutic goal in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients has shifted from controlling the clinical activity alone to managing other associated problems. The concept of mucosal healing (MH) and deep remission (DR) are advocated and regarded as new therapeutic goals in IBD. However, the definition of MH still remains controversial. It is unclear whether or not the histological structures or functional factors should be included in the definition of DR in addition to clinical remission and MH. The classifications of white-light imaging (e.g. Mayo endoscopic subscore, UCEIS, CD Endoscopic Index of Severity, simple Endoscopic Score-CD) have been proposed and are now widely used to assess the severity as well as the MH of inflammation in IBD. In ulcerative colitis, magnifying chromoendoscopy has been shown to be useful to assess the MH of inflammation while other types of image-enhanced endoscopy, such as narrow-band imaging, have not. Endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) are also applied to assess the activity in IBD. These endoscopic procedures can estimate MH with more precision through observing the details of superficial structures, such as crypt openings. In addition, CLE can partially assess the mucosal function by detecting fluorescence leakage. Molecular imaging can possibly detect the molecules associated with inflammation, intestinal regeneration and differentiation, and various functions including the intestinal barrier and mucus secretion. These novel procedures may improve the diagnosis strategy of DR through the assessment of DR-associated factors such as the histological structures and functional factors in the near future.

Relationship between Mayo endoscopic score and histological scores in ulcerative colitis: A prospective study

Background

The Mayo endoscopic score (MES) remains the most commonly used index in clinical practice, as well as in various clinical trials. Recently, two validated histological indices (Nancy Index [NI] and Robert Histological Index [RHI]) have been developed for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aim to study the relationship between MES with NI, RHI, and the established Geboes Index (GI) in patients with UC.

Methods

This was a prospective single‐center study. MES was documented from the most involved area. Biopsy was taken from the same area and reported by a single gastrointestinal histopathologist who was blinded to the endoscopic score. Histological activity was reported using GI, NI, and RHI. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient using SPSS version 23.

Results

Median age of patients with UC (n = 96) was 36 years. Seventeen patients were in endoscopic remission (MES 0/1). Correlation coefficient between MES and GI/NI/RHI was only weak to moderate (rho = 0.381/0.389/0.442, respectively; P < 0.001 for all three correlations). In patients with endoscopic mucosal healing (n = 17), the agreement coefficient between MES and GI/RHI was weak (κ = 0.253/0.336, respectively; P = 0.001 for both agreements). However, there was no significant agreement coefficient between MES and NI (P = 0.573).

Conclusion

MES moderately correlated with histological scores. RHI had the best correlation with MES among all histological indices. Endoscopic mucosal healing is not strongly correlated with histological healing. Histological examination should be performed even in patients with mucosal healing to detect ongoing histological activity.

Hyaluronan Accelerates Intestinal Mucosal Healing through Interaction with TSG-6

Hyaluronan (HA) has proven to be beneficial in the treatment of several diseases. Recently, it has been shown that the local application of HA (IBD98E) improves endoscopic and clinical outcomes in subjects with active distal ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the mechanisms by which this polysaccharide exerts its beneficial effects are unclear. Here, we demonstrated that HA treatment in vitro and in vivo improved mucosal healing by accelerating intestinal epithelial regeneration. Indeed, mice treated with HA showed a faster recovery from colitis and reduced endoscopic signs of mucosal inflammation compared to those receiving saline. Furthermore, histological analysis revealed less ulcerated mucosa in mice treated with HA, characterized by re-epithelialized areas. TSG-6, the secreted product of TNF-stimulated gene-6, is an HA-binding protein shown previously to have tissue-protective properties and promote wound healing. Mucosal levels of TSG-6 increased in UC patients compared to the healthy controls and also after wounding in mice. TSG-6 deletion prevented the beneficial properties of HA in mucosal wound repair, suggesting that the interaction of HA with TSG-6 is crucial for intestinal epithelial regeneration. Overall these results are consistent with HA having a therapeutic effect via the promotion of mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: Expanding horizon

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases has witnessed paradigm shift from 5-aminosalicylic acid and glucocorticoids to various immunosuppressant and biological agents. Targets of therapy have also been changed drastically from symptomatic improvement to mucosal, histological healing, and recently transmural healing. Mucosal healing is associated with reduced need of steroid therapy, hospitalization, and surgery. However, whether mucosal healing alters the natural history of disease remains to be proven. Though assessment of mucosal healing is traditionally done by endoscopic examination, newer tests like fecal calprotectin, capsule endoscopy, and magnetic resonance enterography have also shown promising results. Various immunosuppressants and biologicals are the main therapy being used to achieve mucosal healing. This review focuses on the need for achieving mucosal healing, its long-term benefits, various methods and algorithm for diagnosis, and achievement of mucosal healing.