A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Examining the Use of Brain Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy versus Craniotomy for the Treatment of High-Grade Tumors in or near Areas of Eloquence: An Examination of the Extent of Resection and Major Complication Rates Associated with Each Type of Surgery

Current status and research progress of minimally invasive treatment of glioma

Glioma has a high malignant degree and poor prognosis, which seriously affects the prognosis of patients. Traditional treatment methods mainly include craniotomy tumor resection, postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although above methods have achieved remarkable curative effect, they still have certain limitations and adverse reactions. With the introduction of the concept of minimally invasive surgery and its clinical application as well as the development and progress of imaging technology, minimally invasive treatment of glioma has become a research hotspot in the field of neuromedicine, including photothermal treatment, photodynamic therapy, laser-induced thermal theraphy and TT-Fields of tumor. These therapeutic methods possess the advantages of precision, minimally invasive, quick recovery and significant curative effect, and have been widely used in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to introduce the progress of minimally invasive treatment of glioma in recent years and the achievements and prospects for the future.

Focus on current and emerging treatment options for glioma: A comprehensive review

This comprehensive review delves into the current updates and challenges associated with the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG), the predominant primary tumors in the central nervous system. With a general incidence rate of 5.81 per 100000, gliomas pose a significant global concern, necessitating advancements in treatment techniques to reduce mortality and morbidity. This review places a particular focus on immunotherapies, discussing promising agents such as Zotiraciclib and Lerapolturev. Zotiraciclib, a CDK9 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in glioblastoma treatment in preclinical and clinical studies, showing its potential as a therapeutic breakthrough. Lerapolturev, a viral immunotherapy, induces inflammation in glioblastoma and displays positive outcomes in both adult and pediatric patients. Exploration of immunotherapy extends to Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and Entrectinib, revealing the challenges and variabilities in patient responses. Despite promising preclinical data, the monoclonal antibody Depatuxizumab has proven ineffective in glioblastoma treatment, emphasizing the critical need to understand resistance mechanisms. The review also covers the success of radiation therapy in pediatric LGG, with evolving techniques, such as proton therapy, showing potential improvements in patient quality of life. Surgical treatment is discussed in the context of achieving a balance between preserving the patient's quality of life and attaining gross total resection, with the extent of surgical resection significantly influencing the survival outcomes. In addition to advancements in cancer vaccine development, this review highlights the evolving landscape of LGG treatment, emphasizing a shift toward personalized and targeted therapies. Ongoing research is essential for refining strategies and enhancing outcomes in the management of LGG.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as adjunct for planning laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) near eloquent structures

LITT is a minimally-invasive laser ablation technique used to treat a wide variety of intracranial lesions. Difficulties performing intraoperative mapping have limited its adoption for lesions in/near eloquent regions. In this institutional case series, we demonstrate the utility of fMRI-adjunct planning for LITT near language or motor areas. Six out of 7 patients proceeded with LITT after fMRI-based tractography determined adequate safety margins for ablation. All underwent successful ablation without new or worsening postoperative symptoms requiring adjuvant corticosteroids, including those with preexisting deficits. fMRI is an easily accessible adjunct which may potentially reduce chances of complications in LITT near eloquent structures.

Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.

Gold Nanostars Obviate Limitations to Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) for the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors

PURPOSE

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an effective minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors. Our group produced plasmonics-active gold nanostars (GNS) designed to preferentially accumulate within intracranial tumors and amplify the ablative capacity of LITT.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The impact of GNS on LITT coverage capacity was tested in ex vivo models using clinical LITT equipment and agarose gel-based phantoms of control and GNS-infused central "tumors." In vivo accumulation of GNS and amplification of ablation were tested in murine intracranial and extracranial tumor models followed by intravenous GNS injection, PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), histopathology, and laser ablation.

RESULTS

Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the potential of GNS to accelerate and specify thermal distributions. In ex vivo cuboid tumor phantoms, the GNS-infused phantom heated 5.5× faster than the control. In a split-cylinder tumor phantom, the GNS-infused border heated 2× faster and the surrounding area was exposed to 30% lower temperatures, with margin conformation observed in a model of irregular GNS distribution. In vivo, GNS preferentially accumulated within intracranial tumors on PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, and ICP-MS at 24 and 72 hours and significantly expedited and increased the maximal temperature achieved in laser ablation compared with control.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence for use of GNS to improve the efficiency and potentially safety of LITT. The in vivo data support selective accumulation within intracranial tumors and amplification of laser ablation, and the GNS-infused phantom experiments demonstrate increased rates of heating, heat contouring to tumor borders, and decreased heating of surrounding regions representing normal structures.

Robotic Instruments Inside the MRI Bore: Key Concepts and Evolving Paradigms in Imaging-enhanced Cranial Neurosurgery

Intraoperative MRI has been increasingly used to robotically deliver electrodes and catheters into the human brain using a linear trajectory with great clinical success. Current cranial MR guided robotics do not allow for continuous real-time imaging during the procedure because most surgical instruments are not MR-conditional. MRI guided robotic cranial surgery can achieve its full potential if all the traditional advantages of robotics (such as tremor-filtering, precision motion scaling, etc.) can be incorporated with the neurosurgeon physically present in the MRI bore or working remotely through controlled robotic arms. The technological limitations of design optimization, choice of sensing, kinematic modeling, physical constraints, and real-time control had hampered early developments in this emerging field, but continued research and development in these areas over time has granted neurosurgeons far greater confidence in using cranial robotic techniques. This article elucidates the role of MR-guided robotic procedures using clinical devices like NeuroBlate and Clearpoint that have several thousands of cases operated in a "linear cranial trajectory" and planned clinical trials, such as LAANTERN for MR guided robotics in cranial neurosurgery using LITT and MR-guided putaminal delivery of AAV2 GDNF in Parkinson's disease. The next logical improvisation would be a steerable curvilinear trajectory in cranial robotics with added DOFs and distal tip dexterity to the neurosurgical tools. Similarly, the novel concept of robotic actuators that are powered, imaged, and controlled by the MRI itself is discussed in this article, with its potential for seamless cranial neurosurgery.

Supratotal Surgical Resection for Low-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review

Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are optimally treated with up-front maximal safe surgical resection, typically defined as maximizing the extent of tumor resection while minimizing neurologic risks of surgery. Supratotal resection of LGG may improve outcomes beyond gross total resection by removing tumor cells invading beyond the tumor border as defined on MRI. However, the evidence regarding supratotal resection of LGG, in terms of impact on clinical outcomes, such as overall survival and neurologic morbidities, remains unclear. Authors independently searched the PubMed, Medline, Ovid, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases for studies evaluating overall survival, time to progression, seizure outcomes, and postoperative neurologic and medical complications of supratotal resection/FLAIRectomy of WHO-defined LGGs. Papers in languages other than English, lacking full-text availability, evaluating supratotal resection of WHO-defined high-grade gliomas only, and nonhuman studies were excluded. After literature search, reference screening, and initial exclusions, 65 studies were screened for relevancy, of which 23 were evaluated via full-text review, and 10 were ultimately included in the final evidence review. Studies were evaluated for quality using the MINORS criteria. After data extraction, a total of 1301 LGG patients were included in the analysis, with 377 (29.0%) undergoing supratotal resection. The main measured outcomes were extent of resection, pre- and postoperative neurological deficits, seizure control, adjuvant treatment, neuropsychological outcomes, ability to return to work, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall, low- to moderate-quality evidence was supportive of aggressive, functional boundary-based resection of LGGs due to improvements in progression-free survival and seizure control. The published literature provides a moderate amount of low-quality evidence supporting supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries for low-grade glioma. Among patients included in this analysis, the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits was low, and nearly all patients recovered within 3 to 6 months after surgery. Notably, the surgical centers represented in this analysis have significant experience in glioma surgery in general, and supratotal resection specifically. In this setting, supratotal surgical resection along functional boundaries appears to be appropriate for both symptomatic and asymptomatic low-grade glioma patients. Larger clinical studies are needed to better define the role of supratotal resection in LGG.

The Evolution of Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Gliomas

Laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) has evolved over the past two decades to treat a number of intracranial pathologies. Although it initially emerged as a salvage treatment of surgically inoperable tumors or recurrent lesions that had exhausted more conventional treatments, it is now being used as a primary, first-line treatment in certain instances with outcomes comparable to traditional surgical resection. The authors discuss the evolution of LITT in the treatment of gliomas and future directions, which may further enhance the efficacy of this procedure.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors that are challenging to treat via traditional methods; however, its safety and efficacy are not yet well validated in the literature. The objectives of the study were to assess the available evidence of the indications and adverse events (AEs) of LITT and 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival in the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October 2021. Comparative and descriptive studies, except for case reports, were included in the meta-analysis. Separate analyses by tumor type (high-grade gliomas, including World Health Organization grade 4 astrocytomas [which include glioblastomas] as a specific subgroup; low-grade gliomas; and brain metastases) were conducted. Pooled effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated via random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 826 patients for meta-analysis. There were 829 lesions in total, of which 361 were classified as high-grade gliomas, 116 as low-grade gliomas, 337 as metastatic brain tumors, and 15 as nonglial tumors. Indications for offering LITT included deep/inaccessible tumor (12 studies), salvage therapy after failed radiosurgery (9), failures of ≥2 treatment options (3), in pediatric patients (4), patient preference (1); indications were nonspecific in 12 studies. Pooled incidence of all (minor or major) procedure-related AEs was 30% (95% CI, 27%-40%) for all tumors. Pooled incidence of neurologic deficits (minor or major) was 16% (12%-22%); postprocedural edema 14% (8%-22%); seizure 6% (4%-9%); hematoma 20% (14%-29%); deep vein thrombosis 19% (11%-30%); hydrocephalus 8% (5%-12%); and wound infection 5% (3%-7%). One-year progression-free survival was 18.6% (11.3%-29.0%) in high-grade gliomas, 16.9% (11.6%-24.0%) among the grade 4 astrocytomas; and 51.2% (36.7%-65.5%) in brain metastases. One-year overall survival was 43.0% (36.0%-50.0%) in high-grade glioma, 45.9% (95% CI, 37.9%-54%) in grade 4 astrocytomas; 93.0% (42.3%-100%) in low-grade gliomas, and 56.3% (47.0%-65.3%) in brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

New neurologic deficits and postprocedural edema were the most reported AEs after LITT, albeit mostly transient. This meta-analysis provides the best statistical estimates of progression and survival outcomes based on the available information. LITT is generally a safe procedure for selected patients, and future well-designed comparative studies on its outcomes versus the current standard of care should be performed.

[High-intensity laser therapy in clinical medicine: scientometric analysis of evidence of effectiveness]

INTRODUCTION

High-intensity laser technologies are widely used in modern restorative medicine, and indications for their use are expanding annually. These technologies are effective, potentially safe methods of treating many diseases. with pronounced therapeutic effects.

PURPOSE OF RESEARCH

Analysis of scientific evidence of the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with various diseases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive scientometric analysis of evidence-based studies of the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity laser therapy methods was carried out according to electronic databases (Google scholar, PEDro, PubMed, Cochrane DATABASE) for the period from 2006 to 2021.

RESULTS

High-intensity laser therapy has a wide range of significantly pronounced therapeutic effects. and it is an effective method of treating patients with various diseases. Various technologies and methods of its application are widely used in various fields of clinical medicine. Individually developed therapy protocols are needed, with optimal exposure parameters for each patient, intervals between procedures.

CONCLUSION

It is advisable to develop more reliable and standard evaluation criteria, regular generalization and analysis of existing evidence, careful planning and implementation of further large-scale randomized controlled trials to study the effects of high-intensity laser radiation both as a single effect and as part of combinations with other treatment methods. The effectiveness of combination therapy requires further analysis in the course of conducting new benign clinical trials.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques in patients with intractable epilepsy with CT-guided stereotactic cryoablation as a superior alternative: a systematic review

Background

Stereotactic cryoablation is a minimally invasive surgical technique that has been used to treat disorders of the brain in the past; however, in current practice, it is primarily used for the treatment of liver, kidney, lung, prostate, and breast neoplasms. In this paper, currently used surgical methods to treat medically refractory seizure disorder are reviewed, and a case is made for the use of stereotactic cryoablation.

Main body

Anterior temporal lobectomy is the gold standard for temporal. There are also several variations of this procedure. Since this is a resective surgery, it can result in neurological defects. To obviate this problem, minimally invasive surgical techniques such as radio frequency ablation and laser interstitial thermal therapy are currently being used for intracranial targets. Cryoablation offers certain advantages over thermal ablations. Cryoablation studies in brain, renal, breast, and other neoplasms have shown that cryoablation has superior abilities to monitor the ablation zone in real time via computerized tomography imaging and also has the capability to create lesions of both smaller and larger sizes. This allows for safer and more effective tumor destruction.

Short conclusion

Based on the review, the authors conclude that further investigation of the use of stereotactic cryoablation in patients with medically intractable epilepsy is needed.

Anti-Fn14-Conjugated Prussian Blue Nanoparticles as a Targeted Photothermal Therapy Agent for Glioblastoma

Prussian blue nanoparticles (PBNPs) are effective photothermal therapy (PTT) agents: they absorb near-infrared radiation and reemit it as heat via phonon-phonon relaxations that, in the presence of tumors, can induce thermal and immunogenic cell death. However, in the context of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, the off-target effects of PTT have the potential to result in injury to healthy CNS tissue. Motivated by this need for targeted PTT agents for CNS tumors, we present a PBNP formulation that targets fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14)-expressing glioblastoma cell lines. We conjugated an antibody targeting Fn14, a receptor abundantly expressed on many glioblastomas but near absent on healthy CNS tissue, to PBNPs (aFn14-PBNPs). We measured the attachment efficiency of aFn14 onto PBNPs, the size and stability of aFn14-PBNPs, and the ability of aFn14-PBNPs to induce thermal and immunogenic cell death and target and treat glioblastoma tumor cells in vitro. aFn14 remained stably conjugated to the PBNPs for at least 21 days. Further, PTT with aFn14-PBNPs induced thermal and immunogenic cell death in glioblastoma tumor cells. However, in a targeted treatment assay, PTT was only effective in killing glioblastoma tumor cells when using aFn14-PBNPs, not when using PBNPs alone. Our methodology is novel in its targeting moiety, tumor application, and combination with PTT. To the best of our knowledge, PBNPs have not been investigated as a targeted PTT agent in glioblastoma via conjugation to aFn14. Our results demonstrate a novel and effective method for delivering targeted PTT to aFn14-expressing tumor cells via aFn14 conjugation to PBNPs.

Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors

Background:

Repeat craniotomy in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors carries significant morbidity and can delay adjuvant treatments. Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent disease has been described and could benefit patients with limited cytoreductive options. We aim to describe the indications, safety, and efficacy of repeat LITT for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors.

Methods:

Patients undergoing repeat ablations for the same lesion were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed 13 patients treated with 29 total LITT ablations.

Results:

Eleven patients were treated for glioblastoma (GBM), while two had brain metastases. Eleven patients had LITT performed only 2 times, while three patients underwent three total iterations of LITT for disease recurrence. Median length of stay after the 1^st ablation was 2 days, while the median length of stay after the 2^nd ablation was 1 day. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 1^st LITT was 11 days. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 2^nd LITT was 28 days. Four patients after the 1^st and 2^nd LITT sustained deficits persisting through 30-day follow-up. The median progression-free survival among the GBM patients from the first ablation was 6.0 months, 3.2 months from the 2^nd ablation, and 2.1 months from the 3^rd ablation.

Conclusion:

Recurrent tumors, especially GBM, can be safely treated using repeat LITT when surgery cannot be effectively performed. Our results indicate that patients tolerate the procedure well and have a meaningful survival given the salvage nature of the procedure.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment.

QUESTION

Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery.

LEVEL III

Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Grade 2/3 IDH1/2 Mutant Gliomas: A Preliminary Report and Literature Review

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has become an increasingly utilized alternative to surgical resection for the treatment of glioma in patients. However, treatment outcomes in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) mutant glioma, specifically, have not been reported. The objective of this study was to characterize a single institution’s cohort of IDH1/2 mutant grade 2/3 glioma patients treated with LITT. We collected data on patient presentation, radiographic features, tumor molecular profile, complications, and outcomes. We calculated progression-free survival (PFS) and tested factors for significant association with longer PFS. Overall, 22.7% of our cohort experienced progression at a median follow up of 1.8 years. The three- and five-year estimates of PFS were 72.5% and 54.4%, respectively. This is the first study to characterize outcomes in patients with IDH1/2 mutant glioma after LITT. Our results suggest that LITT is an effective treatment option for IDH1/2 mutant glioma.

Advances in local therapy for glioblastoma - taking the fight to the tumour

Despite advances in neurosurgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, glioblastoma remains one of the most treatment-resistant CNS malignancies, and the tumour inevitably recurs. The majority of recurrences appear in or near the resection cavity, usually within the area that received the highest dose of radiation. Many new therapies focus on combatting these local recurrences by implementing treatments directly in or near the tumour bed. In this Review, we discuss the latest developments in local therapy for glioblastoma, focusing on recent preclinical and clinical trials. The approaches that we discuss include novel intraoperative techniques, various treatments of the surgical cavity, stereotactic injections directly into the tumour, and new developments in convection-enhanced delivery and intra-arterial treatments.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have advanced the treatment of metastatic diseases to the spine. The objective of this review is to describe clinical outcomes, benefits, and complications of these techniques.

METHODS

All relevant clinical studies describing the role of MIS, computer-assisted navigation (CAN), robot-assisted (RA) procedures, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in the treatment of metastatic spine diseases were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE, and relevant article bibliographies.

RESULTS

For MIS articles, we filtered 1480 results and identified 26 studies. For CAN, we searched 464 articles to identify 18 articles for review. For RA, we searched 321 results to identify 7 studies for review. For LITT, we identified 21 articles for review.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS for the treatment of spine metastasis has significant potential benefits in reducing surgical site infections, hospital stay, and blood loss without compromising instrument accuracy or overall outcomes. Overall, MIS and its adjuncts have the potential to reduce the risks involved in the treatment of patients with metastatic disease to the spinal column without compromising the benefits of decompression and stabilization of the spine.

Airway Management with Leksell Frame in situ with or without Frontal Bar: A Mannequin Study

BACKGROUND

The use of stereotactic headframes for neurosurgical procedures requiring targeted localization continues to grow with new advancements in technology and treatment modalities. A configuration of the Leksell stereotactic G frame with a straight front bar, useful in epilepsy and laser cases, almost completely obscures oral access and presents a significant airway challenge for the anesthetist. Although previous papers have suggested that the entire headframe should be removed during an airway emergency, we describe a novel method to remove only the front bar.

METHODS

We performed an observational mannequin study. Anesthesia personnel from a single center were asked to intubate a mannequin with the Leksell frame fully in situ and again with the front bar removed. In addition, the time to remove the entire frame versus only the front bar was investigated.

RESULTS

Eighteen anesthesia personnel participated in the study as well as four neurosurgeons. The average time to intubate the mannequin in the frame was 23.5 (11.4) seconds and with the front bar removed, 10.9 (2.5) seconds (p < 0.001). The average time taken to remove just the front bar by the neurosurgeons was 35.4 (7.3) seconds compared to an average of 83.3 (18.6) seconds to remove the headframe entirely (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that intubating with the Leksell front bar in situ is possible with videolaryngoscopy under an ideal situation. More importantly, the removal of just the front bar is a simpler more streamlined approach requiring statistically less time to secure an airway.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

A Cohort Study on Prognostic Factors for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Success in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a promising approach for cytoreduction of deep-seated gliomas. However, parameters contributing to treatment success remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify extent of ablation (EOA) and time to chemotherapy (TTC) as predictors of improved overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) and suggest laser parameters to achieve optimal EOA.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and survival data were collected retrospectively from 20 patients undergoing LITT for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). EOA was calculated through magnetic resonance imaging-based volumetric analysis. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used to examine the relationship between EOA with OS and PFS accounting for covariates (age, isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutation, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylation). The effect of laser thermodynamic parameters (power, energy, time) on EOA was identified through linear regression.

RESULTS

Median OS and PFS for the entire cohort were 36.2 and 3.5 mo respectively. Patient's with >70% EOA had significantly improved PFS compared to ≤70% EOA (5.2 vs 2.3 mo, P = .01) and trended toward improved OS (36.2 vs 11 mo, P = .07) on univariate and multivariate analysis. Total laser power was a significant predictor for increased EOA when accounting for preoperative lesion volume (P = .001). Chemotherapy within 16 d of surgery significantly predicted improved PFS compared to delaying chemotherapy (9.4 vs 3.1 mo, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Increased EOA was a predictor of improved PFS with evidence of a trend toward improved OS in LITT treatment of nGBM. A strategy favoring higher laser power during tumor ablation may achieve optimal EOA. Early transition to chemotherapy after LITT improves PFS.

Pattern of technology diffusion in the adoption of stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in neuro-oncology

PURPOSE

Understanding factors that influence technology diffusion is central to clinical translation of novel therapies. We characterized the pattern of adoption for laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), also known as stereotactic laser ablation (SLA), in neuro-oncology using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

We identified patients age ≥ 18 in the NIS (2012-2018) with a diagnosis of primary or metastatic brain tumor that underwent LITT or craniotomy. We compared characteristics and outcomes for patients that underwent these procedures.

RESULTS

LITT utilization increased ~ 400% relative to craniotomy during the study period. Despite this increase, the total number of LITT procedures performed for brain tumor was < 1% of craniotomy. After adjusting for this time trend, LITT patients were less likely to have > 2 comorbidities (OR 0.64, CI₉₅ 0.51-0.79) or to be older (OR 0.92, CI₉₅ 0.86-0.99) and more likely to be female (OR 1.35, CI₉₅ 1.08-1.69), Caucasian compared to Black (OR 1.94, CI₉₅ 1.12-3.36), and covered by private insurance compared to Medicare or Medicaid (OR 1.38, CI₉₅ 1.09-1.74). LITT hospital stays were 50% shorter than craniotomy (IRR 0.52, CI₉₅ 0.45-0.61). However, charges related to the procedures were comparable between LITT and craniotomy ($1397 greater for LITT, CI₉₅ $-5790 to $8584).

CONCLUSION

For neuro-oncology indications, LITT utilization increased ~ 400% relative to craniotomy. Relative to craniotomy-treated patients, LITT-treated patients were likelier to be young, female, non-Black race, covered by private insurance, or with < 2 comorbidities. While the total hospital charges were comparable, LITT was associated with a shorter hospitalization relative to craniotomy.

Laser thermal therapy in the management of high-grade gliomas

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive therapy that have been used for brain tumors, epilepsy, chronic pain, and other spine pathologies. This therapy is performed under imaging and stereotactic guidance to precisely direct the probe and ablate the area of interest using real-time magnetic resonance (MR) thermography. LITT has gained popularity as a treatment for glioma because of its minimally invasive nature, small skin incision, repeatability, shorter hospital stay, and the possibility of receiving adjuvant therapy shortly after surgery instead of several weeks as required after open surgical resection. Several reports have demonstrated the usefulness of LITT in the treatment of newly-diagnosed and recurrent gliomas. In this review, we will summarize the recent evidence of this therapy in the field of glioma surgery and the future perspectives of the use of LITT combined with other treatment strategies for this devastating disease.

Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue Using Robotic NeuroBlate System (LAANTERN): 12-Month Outcomes and Quality of Life After Brain Tumor Ablation

BACKGROUND

Laser Ablation of Abnormal Neurological Tissue using Robotic NeuroBlate System (LAANTERN) is an ongoing multicenter prospective NeuroBlate (Monteris Medical) LITT (laser interstitial thermal therapy) registry collecting real-world outcomes and quality-of-life (QoL) data.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 12-mo outcomes from all subjects undergoing LITT for intracranial tumors/neoplasms.

METHODS

Demographics, intraprocedural data, adverse events, QoL, hospitalizations, health economics, and survival data are collected; standard data management and monitoring occur.

RESULTS

A total of 14 centers enrolled 223 subjects; the median follow-up was 223 d. There were 119 (53.4%) females and 104 (46.6%) males. The median age was 54.3 yr (range 3-86) and 72.6% had at least 1 baseline comorbidity. The median baseline Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 90. Of the ablated tumors, 131 were primary and 92 were metastatic. Most patients with primary tumors had high-grade gliomas (80.9%). Patients with metastatic cancer had recurrence (50.6%) or radiation necrosis (40%). The median postprocedure hospital stay was 33.4 h (12.7-733.4). The 1-yr estimated survival rate was 73%, and this was not impacted by disease etiology. Patient-reported QoL as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain was stabilized postprocedure. KPS declined by an average of 5.7 to 10.5 points postprocedure; however, 50.5% had stabilized/improved KPS at 6 mo. There were no significant differences in KPS or QoL between patients with metastatic vs primary tumors.

CONCLUSION

Results from the ongoing LAANTERN registry demonstrate that LITT stabilizes and improves QoL from baseline levels in a malignant brain tumor patient population with high rates of comorbidities. Overall survival was better than anticipated for a real-world registry and comparative to published literature.

Current Role of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is gaining popularity in the treatment of both primary and secondary intracranial tumors. The goal of LITT is to deliver thermal energy in a predictable, controlled, and minimally invasive fashion. It can be particularly valuable in patients with recurrent tumors who, due to previous radiation or surgery, may have a potentially higher risk of wound breakdown or infection with repeat craniotomy. Deep-seated lesions that are often inaccessible through open approaches (thalamus, hypothalamus, mesial basal temporal lobe, brainstem) may also be suitable targets. The experience and data published thus far on this modality is limited but growing. This review highlights the use of LITT as a primary treatment method in a variety of intracranial tumors, as well as its application as an adjunct to established surgical techniques.

Stereotactic Laser Ablation of Glioblastoma

The previous decade has seen an expansion in the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for a variety of pathologies. LITT has been used to treat both newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), especially in deep-seated, difficult-to-access lesions where open resection is otherwise infeasible or in patients who would not tolerate craniotomy. This review aims to describe the current state of the technology and operative technique, as well as summarize the outcomes data and future research regarding LITT as a treatment of GBM.

A novel online calculator predicting short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with metastatic brain tumors

Purpose

Establishing predictors of hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge deposition, and total hospital charges is essential to providing high-quality, value-based care. Though previous research has investigated these outcomes for patients with metastatic brain tumors, there are currently no tools that synthesize such research findings and allow for prediction of these outcomes on a patient-by-patient basis. The present study sought to develop a prediction calculator that uses patient demographic and clinical information to predict extended hospital length of stay, non-routine discharge disposition, and high total hospital charges for patients with metastatic brain tumors.

Methods

Patients undergoing surgery for metastatic brain tumors at a single academic institution were analyzed (2017–2019). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of extended LOS (> 7 days), non-routine discharge, and high total hospital charges (> $ 46,082.63). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. C-statistics and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test were used to assess model discrimination and calibration, respectively.

Results

A total of 235 patients were included in our analysis, with a mean age of 62.74 years. The majority of patients were female (52.3%) and Caucasian (76.6%). Our models predicting extended LOS, non-routine discharge, and high hospital charges had optimism-corrected c-statistics > 0.7, and all three models demonstrated adequate calibration (p > 0.05). The final models are available as an online calculator (https://neurooncsurgery.shinyapps.io/brain_mets_calculator/).

Conclusions

Our models predicting postoperative outcomes allow for individualized risk-estimation for patients following surgery for metastatic brain tumors. Our results may be useful in helping clinicians to provide resource-conscious, high-value care.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy in neuro-oncology applications

Background:

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for multiple intracranial pathologies that are of growing interest to neurosurgeons and their patients and is emerging as an effective alternative to standard of care open surgery in the neurosurgical armamentarium. This option was initially considered for those patients with medical comorbidities and lesion-specific characteristics that confer excessively high risk for resection through a standard craniotomy approach but indications are changing.

Methods:

The PubMed database was searched for studies in the English literature on LITT for the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors, meningiomas, as well as for radiation necrosis (RN) in previously irradiated brain tumors.

Results:

This review provides an update of the relevant literature regarding application of LITT in neurosurgical oncology for the treatment of de novo and recurrent primary gliomas and brain metastases radiographically regrowing after previous irradiation as recurrent tumor or RN. In addition, this review details the limited experience of LITT with meningiomas and symptomatic peritumoral edema after radiosurgery. The advantages and disadvantages, indications, and comparisons to standard of care treatments such as craniotomy for open surgical resection are discussed for each pathology. Finally, the literature on cost-benefit analyses for LITT are reviewed.

Conclusion:

The studies discussed in this review have helped define the role of LITT in neurosurgical oncology and delineate optimal patient selection and tumor characteristics most suitable to this intervention.

The intersection between immunotherapy and laser interstitial thermal therapy: a multipronged future of neuro-oncology

The rise of immunotherapy (IT) in oncological treatment has greatly improved outcomes in a number of disease states. However, its use in tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) remains limited for multiple reasons related to the unique immunologic tumor microenvironment. As such, it is valuable to consider the intersection of IT with additional treatment methods that may improve access to the CNS and effectiveness of existing IT modalities. One such combination is the pairing of IT with localized hyperthermia (HT) generated through technologies such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). The wide-ranging immunomodulatory effects of localized and whole-body HT have been investigated for some time. Hyperthermia has demonstrated immunostimulatory effects at the level of tumor cells, immune cells, and the broader environment governing potential immune surveillance. A thorough understanding of these effects as well as the current and upcoming investigations of such in combination with IT is important in considering the future directions of neuro-oncology.

Hyperthermia treatment advances for brain tumors

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) of cancer is a well-known treatment approach. With the advent of new technologies, HT approaches are now important for the treatment of brain tumors. We review current clinical applications of HT in neuro-oncology and ongoing preclinical research aiming to advance HT approaches to clinical practice. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is currently the most widely utilized thermal ablation approach in clinical practice mainly for the treatment of recurrent or deep-seated tumors in the brain. Magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT), which relies on the use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and alternating magnetic fields (AMFs), is a new quite promising HT treatment approach for brain tumors. Initial MHT clinical studies in combination with fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients have been completed in Europe with encouraging results. Another combination treatment with HT that warrants further investigation is immunotherapy. HT approaches for brain tumors will continue to a play an important role in neuro-oncology.

Seizure freedom from recurrent insular low-grade glioma following laser interstitial thermal therapy

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are found in approximately 1-3% of patients with childhood epilepsy that is often medically refractory. Magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimal access technique FDA-approved since 2007 to ablate soft tissue lesions including brain tumors and seizure foci in children. The authors describe the case of an 11-year-old boy who presented with focal right-sided seizures and was found to have a growing left insular mass determined to be a WHO grade II diffuse astrocytoma. After the initial open resection using frontotemporal craniotomy with transsylvian approach, gross total resection was achieved; however, the tumor recurred, as did the seizures. Six months postoperatively, the patient underwent laser ablation with MRgLITT for the recurrent tumor with complete removal. At both 1- and 6-months post re-operation, he has remained seizure free. MRgLITT management of LGG allows for both successfully reducing tumor burden and the amelioration of secondary seizures.

Lessons Learned in Using Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Brain Tumors: A Case Series of 238 Patients from a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to craniotomy, and as with any new technology, comes with a learning curve.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience detailing the evolution of this technology in our practice in one of the largest patient cohorts to date regarding LITT in neuro-oncology.

METHODS

We reviewed 238 consecutive patients with brain tumor treated with LITT at our institution. Data on patient, surgery and tumor characteristics, and follow-up were collected. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: early (<2014, 100 patients) and recent (>2015, 138 patients). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 8.4 months.

RESULTS

The indications for LITT included gliomas (70.2%), radiation necrosis (21.0%), and metastasis (8.8%). Patient demographics stayed consistent between the 2 cohorts, with the exception of age (early, 54.3; recent, 58.4; P = 0.04). Operative time (6.6 vs. 3.5; P < 0.001) and number of trajectories (53.1% vs. 77.9% with 1 trajectory; P < 0.001) also decreased in the recent cohort. There was a significant decrease in permanent motor deficits over time (15.5 vs. 4.4%; P = 0.005) and 30-day mortality (4.1% vs. 1.5%) also decreased (not statistically significant) in the recent cohort. In terms of clinical outcomes, poor preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (≤70) were significantly correlated with increased permanent deficits (P = 0.001) and decreased overall survival (P < 0.001 for all time points).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed improvement in operative efficiency and permanent deficits over time and also patients with poor preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status achieved suboptimal outcomes with LITT. As many other treatment modalities, patient selection is important in this procedure.

National Trends and Factors Predicting Outcomes Following Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Brain Lesions: Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a stereotactic-guided technique, which is increasingly being performed for brain lesions. The aim of our study was to report the national trends and factors predicting the clinical outcomes following LITT using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

METHODS

We extracted data from 2011-2016 using ICD-9/10 codes. Patients with a primary procedure of LITT were included. Patient demographics, complications, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and index-hospitalization charges were analyzed.

RESULTS

A cohort of 1768 patients was identified from the database. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.2 days, 82% of patients were discharged to home, and in-hospitalization cost was $124,225. Complications and mortality were noted in 12.9% and 2.5% of patients following LITT, respectively. Non-Caucasian patients (estimate ratio [ER] 4.26), those with other insurance (compared with commercial, ER: 5.35), 3 and 4+ comorbidity indexes, patients with higher quartile median household income (second, third, and fourth quartile compared with first quartile), and those who underwent nonelective procedures were likely to have higher complications and less likely to be discharged home. Patients with 4+ comorbidity indexes were likely to have longer length of hospital stay (ER 1.39) and higher complications (ER: 7.95) and were less likely to be discharged home (ER: 0.17) and have higher in-hospitalization cost (ER: 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

LITT is increasingly being performed with low complication rates. Non-Caucasian race, higher comorbidity index, noncommercial insurance, and nonelective procedures were predictors of higher complications and being less likely to be discharged home. In-hospitalization charges were higher in patients with higher comorbidity index and those with noncommercial insurance.

Evolving Strategies to Potentially Further Optimize Surgical Interventions in Brain Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an overview, the indications for use, and a synopsis of current literature regarding two evolving neurosurgical interventions-GammaTile therapy (GTT) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT).

RECENT FINDINGS

GTT delivers immediate, uniform, high-dose radiation with avoidance of direct brain-to-seed contact. Innate properties of the novel carrier system and cesium-131 source may explain lower observed rate of radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) and support use in larger and previously irradiated lesions. LITT delivers focal laser energy to cause heat-generated necrosis. Case series suggest use in difficult-to-access lesions and treatment of RIN. Collaboration among subspecialties and remaining up-to-date on evolving technology is critical in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with brain cancer. While patients should be thoroughly counseled that these interventions are not standard of care, in optimal clinical scenarios, GTT and LITT could extend quantity and quality of life for patients with few remaining options. Prospective studies are needed to establish specific treatment parameters.

Current clinical management of patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, historically resistant to treatment, and with overall fatal outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, several molecular subgroups and rare genetic alterations have been described in GB. In this review article, we will describe the current clinical management of patients with GB in the United States, discuss selected next-generation molecular-targeted therapies in GB, and present ongoing clinical trials for patients with GB. This review is intended for clinical and preclinical researchers who conduct work on GB and would like to understand more about the current standard of treatment of GB patients, historical perspectives, current challenges, and ongoing and upcoming clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

GB is an extremely complex disease, and despite recent progress and advanced therapeutic strategies, the overall patient's prognosis remains dismal. Innovative strategies and integrative ways of approach to disease are urgently needed.

Microneuroanatomy of the Anterior Frontal Laser Trajectory to the Insula

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an emerging minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of deep intracranial lesions. Insular lesions are challenging to treat because of the risk of damaging important surrounding structures. The precise knowledge of the neural structures that are at risk along the trajectory and during the ablation is essential to reduce associated complications. This study aims to describe the relevant anatomy of the anterior frontal LITT trajectory to the insular region by using sectional anatomy and fiber dissection technique.

METHODS

Three silicone-injected cadaveric heads were used to implant laser catheters bilaterally to the insular region by using a frameless stereotactic technique from a frontal approach. Sections were cut in both the oblique axial plane parallel to the trajectory and in the coronal plane. White matter fiber dissections were used to establish the tracts related to the laser trajectory from lateral to medial and medial to lateral.

RESULTS

Supraorbital regions were selected as entry points. After crossing the frontal bone, the track intersected the inferior frontal lobe. The catheter was illustrated reaching the insular region medial to the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and insular cortex, and superior to the uncinate fasciculus. The uncinate fasciculus, extreme capsule, claustrum, external capsule, and putamen were traversed, preserving the major vascular structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of the insular area treated, an understanding of the neuroanatomy related to the anterior frontal laser trajectory is essential to improve the ability to perform LITT of this challenging region.

Surgery and Evidence-based Treatments in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the currently accepted standard-of-care practice for surgical and medical management of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed journals, nationally accepted guidelines, and personal experience of the authors.

CONCLUSION

There is a widely accepted standard-of-care treatment protocol for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma that includes maximal safe resection followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The regimen is well-tolerated and side effects are manageable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses who are involved in the care of patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma should be familiar with the regimen and its side effects to provide crucial patient and caregiver education in an accurate and beneficial manner.

Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy in Neuro-Oncology: A Review

OBJECTIVES

Laser therapy has become an appealing treatment modality in neurosurgery. In this review, we report on the history, physics, surgical steps, indications and uses, and complications that have been reported to date.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed for laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and laser therapy in the context of glial tumors, metastatic lesions, pediatric brain tumors, and radiation necrosis. Reported complications in each series also were reviewed.

RESULTS

In the past decade, multiple studies have demonstrated the use, outcomes, and complications associated with LITT in neurosurgery. These same studies have consistently reported an overall benefit of LITT in cases in which traditional surgical approaches may be limited by the patient's clinical status, tumor location, or overall prognosis. However, there have been complications reported from local effects of thermal damage, technical error, and edema development. Increased experience has reduced complications and brought more promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

With the advent of real-time monitoring and damage estimation, LITT has gained ground in the management of intracranial tumors. Larger scale trials must be performed to develop standard protocols to define specific indications for use. Further large clinical studies for LITT in non-oncologic cases are also of interest.

A Single-Center Cost Analysis of Treating Primary and Metastatic Brain Cancers with Either Brain Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) or Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

Brain laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance has recently gained US clinical approval for the ablation of soft, neurological tissue. LITT is a minimally invasive alternative to craniotomy.

OBJECTIVE

While safety and efficacy are the focus of most current LITT studies, it is unclear how acute care costs (inpatient care ± aftercare) of LITT compare to craniotomy in an academic medical center. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis is to examine these costs of using brain LITT under MRI guidance compared to craniotomy in complex anatomies.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated at a single US center from 1 January 2010 to 21 October 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were included if they had a primary procedure for LITT or craniotomy (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] procedure code 17.61 or ICD-9-CM procedure code 01.59, respectively) and were subgrouped according to their diagnosis of primary brain or metastatic brain cancer (ICD-9-CM 191.0-191.9 or ICD-9-CM 198.3, respectively). Patients were excluded if they had co-morbid conditions such as brain edema (ICD-9-CM 348.5). Patients were matched (LITT vs. craniotomy) based on diagnosis. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken to examine the year 2015 costs for care in all settings (acute hospital and post-hospital care, i.e., skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation, and home care) were examined.

RESULTS

In patients treated for a primary brain cancer, there was no statistical difference in the acute and post-care costs of LITT and craniotomy (inverse variance, mean difference [MD], random effects model): MD = -US$1669; 95% confidence interval (CI) -$8192 to $4854; P = 0.62. When examining difficult to access primary malignancies, no difference was found: MD = -US$4719; 95% CI -$12,183 to $2745; P = 0.22. In metastatic brain cancer, LITT was found to be significantly less costly than craniotomy: MD = -US$6522; 95% CI -$11,911 to -$1133; P = 0.02.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with metastatic brain cancer, LITT is less costly than craniotomy. Patients receiving LITT had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay, were significantly older, and were more likely to be discharged home. The use of LITT may be a reasonable option in bundled episodes of care for brain cancer and may fit into the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program being evaluated by Medicare and providers.

Thermal Therapy Approaches for Treatment of Brain Tumors in Animals and Humans

Primary brain tumors are often aggressive, with short survival from time of diagnosis even with standard of care therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Thermal therapies have been extensively investigated as both primary and adjuvant therapy. Although thermal therapies are not yet widely used clinically, there have been several promising approaches demonstrated in both animals and humans. This review presents thermal therapy approaches in animal and human studies, including both hyperthermia (temperatures ~42°C-45°C) and thermal ablation (temperatures > 50°C). Hyperthermia is primarily used as adjuvant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and is the most widely studied radiation sensitizer where enhanced efficacy has been shown in human patients with brain cancer. Hyperthermia has additional beneficial effects such as immunogenic effects, and opening of the bloodbrain barrier to potentially enhance drug delivery, for example in combination with nanoparticle drug delivery systems. Thermal ablation uses high temperatures for direct local tumor destruction, and it found its way into clinical use as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). This review presents various hyperthermia and ablation approaches, including a review of different devices and methods that have been used for thermal therapies, such as radiofrequency/microwaves, laser, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and magnetic nanoparticles. Current research efforts include the combination of advanced thermal therapy devices, such as focused ultrasound with radiation, as well as the use of thermal therapies to enhance chemotherapy delivery across the blood-brain barrier.