Somatostatin Receptor Expression in GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas Treated with Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues in Combination with Pegvisomant

Double Pituitary Adenomas in Patients With Cushing's Disease

Background and objective Double and multiple pituitary adenomas (PAs) are discovered in 2.6-3.3% of patients with Cushing's disease and in approximately 1% of autopsies. Undiagnosed and unremoved second PA may be the cause of unsuccessful surgical treatment of Cushing's disease. In this study, we aimed to describe our experience with the detection and treatment of patients with double PAs. Methods All patients in our series underwent transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) with endoscopic and neuronavigation assistance. Before 2017, we completely relied on MRI findings while planning surgery. From 2017 onwards, a broad revision of the sella turcica was conducted during surgeries regardless of the MRI data. Results Overall, 81 patients were included in the study: 51 before 2017 and 30 in 2017 after. In the pre-2017 group of patients, three out of 51 had double adenomas, and all of them were seen on MRI images. We encountered four more double PAs during the next period. Only two of them had been predicted by MRI. The remission rate was higher after 2017 and amounted to 90% (27 out of 30 patients). In contrast, before the implementation of total revision (pre-2017), our success rate was 82% (42 out of 51 cases). Both neoplasms in cases of double PAs yielded similar histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) features but were consistent with multiple PAs. Conclusions Although the improvement in our results in recent years cannot be clearly attributed to a targeted search for the second microadenoma, we still recommend performing a broad inspection of the sella turcica after the excision of the pituitary microadenoma regardless of preoperative MRI data.

Survivin: A Potential Marker of Resistance to Somatostatin Receptor Ligands

CONTEXT

Invasive and somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)-resistant pituitary tumors represent a challenge in the clinical practice of endocrinologists. Efforts have been made to elucidate reliable makers for both. Survivin and eukaryotic translation initiation factor-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) are upregulated in several cancers and involved in apoptosis and cell proliferation.

OBJECTIVE

We explored the role of these markers in somatotropinomas.

METHODS

Immunostains for survivin and 4EBP1, and also for somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), Ki-67, and cytokeratin 18, were analyzed in tissue microarrays containing 52 somatotropinoma samples. Tumor invasiveness was evaluated in all samples while drug resistance was evaluated in 34 patients who received SRL treatment. All these parameters were correlated with first-generation SRL (fg-SRL) responsiveness and tumor invasiveness.

RESULTS

Low survivin expression (P = 0.04), hyperintense signal on T2 weighted image (T2WI) (P = 0.01), younger age (P = 0.01), sparsely granular adenomas (SGA) (P = 0.04), high postoperative growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (P = 0.049 and P < 0.001, respectively), and large postoperative tumor size (P = 0.02) were associated with resistance to fg-SRL. Low survivin and SSTR2 expression and high 4EBP1 expression were associated with SGA (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.001, respectively). Younger age (P = 0.03), large tumor pre- and postoperative (P = 0.04 and P = 0.006, respectively), low SSTR2 expression (P = 0.03), and high baseline GH and IGF-1 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively) were associated with tumor invasiveness. However, survivin, 4EBP1, Ki-67, and granulation patterns were not associated with tumor invasion.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that low survivin expression is predictive of resistance to fg-SRL in somatotropinomas, but not of tumor invasiveness.

Transcriptome of GH-producing pituitary neuroendocrine tumours and models are significantly affected by somatostatin analogues

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are neoplasms of the pituitary that overproduce hormones or cause unspecific symptoms due to mass effect. Growth hormone overproducing GH-producing PitNETs cause acromegaly leading to connective tissue, metabolic or oncologic disorders. The medical treatment of acromegaly is somatostatin analogues (SSA) in specific cases combined with dopamine agonists (DA), but almost half of patients display partial or full SSA resistance and potential causes of this are unknown. In this study we investigated transcriptomic landscape of GH-producing PitNETs on several levels and functional models-tumour tissue of patients with and without SSA preoperative treatment, tumour derived pituispheres and GH3 cell line incubated with SSA to study effect of medication on gene expression. MGI sequencing platform was used to sequence total RNA from PitNET tissue, pituispheres, mesenchymal stromal stem-like cells (MSC), and GH3 cell cultures, and data were analysed with Salmon-DeSeq2 pipeline. We observed that the GH-producing PitNETs have distinct changes in growth hormone related pathways related to its functional status alongside inner cell signalling, ion transport, cell adhesion and extracellular matrix characteristic patterns. In pituispheres model, treatment regimens (octreotide and cabergoline) affect specific cell proliferation (MKI67) and core functionality pathways (RYR2, COL8A2, HLA-G, ARFGAP1, TGFBR2). In GH3 cells we observed that medication did not have transcriptomic effects similar to preoperative treatment in PitNET tissue or pituisphere model. This study highlights the importance of correct model system selection for cell transcriptomic profiling and data interpretation that could be achieved in future by incorporating NGS methods and detailed cell omics profiling in PitNET model research.

Second line treatment of acromegaly: Pasireotide or Pegvisomant?

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with an increased mortality in case of persistently active disease. The treatment of acromegaly is mainly based on the surgical resection of the GH secreting pituitary tumor and, in cases with persistent disease, on the medical therapy with first generation somatostatin analogues (first gen-SSAs). Data from national registries, meta-analysis and epidemiology studies showed that 24%-65% of acromegaly patients treated with first gen-SSA did not reach the control of disease, requiring second line therapies, as the second gen-SSAs and the GH receptor antagonist. According to the high efficacy of these treatments and their molecular mechanisms of action, the choice of second line therapies should be personalized. In this review, we summarize the evidence on clinical, molecular and morphological aspects that may predict the response to second line therapies, in order to integrate and translate in the clinical practice for a patient-tailored therapeutic approach.

Digital quantification of somatostatin receptor subtype 2a immunostaining: a validation study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop an open-source and reproducible digital quantitative analysis (DIA) of somatostatin receptor subtype 2a (SST2) staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) and growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (GHomas).

DESIGN

SST2 immunostaining of 18 panNETs and 39 GHomas was assessed using a novel DIA protocol and compared with a widely used semi-quantitative immunoreactivity score (IRS).

METHODS

The DIA software calculates the staining intensity/area and the percentage of positive cells (%PC). Four representative images were selected for each sample by two independent selectors (S1 and S2), with the analysis performed by two independent analyzers (A1 and A2). Agreement between observers was calculated using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULTS

In panNETs, the CCC ranged 0.935-0.977 for intensity/area and 0.942-0.983 for %PC. In GHomas, the CCC ranged 0.963-0.997 for intensity/area and 0.979-0.990 for %PC. In both panNETs and GHomas, the DIA staining intensity was strongly correlated with the IRS (Spearman rho: 0.916-0.969, P < 0.001), as well as the DIA %PC with the IRS %PC (Spearman rh: 0.826-0.881, P < 0.001). In GHomas, the biochemical response to somatostatin receptor ligands correlated with SST2 expression, evaluated both as DIA intensity/area (Spearman rho: -0.448 to -0.527, P = 0.007-0.004) and DIA %PC (Spearman rho: -0.558 to -0.644, P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The DIA has an excellent inter-observer agreement and showed a strong correlation with the widely used semi-quantitative IRS. The DIA protocol is an open-source, highly reproducible tool and provides a reliable quantitative evaluation of SST2 immunohistochemistry.

Identification of SSTR5 Gene Polymorphisms and Their Association With Growth Traits in Hulun Buir Sheep

The aim of this study was to locate SSTR5 polymorphisms and evaluate their association with growth traits in Hulun Buir sheep. The study followed up 884 Hulun Buir sheep from birth to 16 months of age, which were born in the same pasture and the same year, and a consistent grazing management strategy was maintained. The birth weight (BRW) was recorded at birth, and body weight (BW), body height (BH), body length (BL), chest circumference (ChC), chest depth (ChD), chest width (ChW), hip width (HW), and cannon circumference (CaC) were measured at 4 and 9 months of age. BW, BH, BL, ChD, HW, and CaC were also recorded at 16 months of age. Based on the growth traits, 233 sheep were selected as experimental animals. Sanger sequencing was performed, and seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified. Association analyses of the SNPs and the growth traits were then conducted. Seven SNPs of the SSTR5 exhibited moderate polymorphism (0.25 Collapse

Key Words

• Hulun Buir sheep
• SSTR5
• association
• growth traits
• haplotypes

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Xue Li Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Ning Ding Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhichao Zhang Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Dehong Tian Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China
Buying Han Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Dehui Liu Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Sijia Liu Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China
Fei Tian Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China
Dejun Fu Inner Mongolia Daxing 'anling Agricultural Reclamation Group Co. LTD., Hulun Buir, China
Xiaoliang Song Inner Mongolia Daxing 'anling Agricultural Reclamation Group Co. LTD., Hulun Buir, China
Kai Zhao Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Ecological Genomics, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, China

Collapse

Differences in somatostatin receptor subtype expression in patients with acromegaly: new directions for targeted therapy?

PURPOSE

To analyze the expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)2a and 5 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in surgically resected somatotrophic pituitary adenomas and to associate expression rates with tumor size and clinical, biochemical, and histological parameters and response to somatostatin analog (SA) therapy.

METHODS

Forty-three microsurgically treated patients with histopathologically proven growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma were included (WHO 2017). SSTR subtype expression was analyzed in adenoma tissues using monoclonal antibodies (Abcam, SSTR2a-UMB1, SSTR5-UMB4). Expression rates were classified as low (≤ 20% staining positivity), moderate (21-50%), and high (> 50%). Furthermore, biochemical parameters such as human growth hormone (hGH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were measured and clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histological data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 43 patients included in this study, 28 were female and 15 were male. The median age was 52 years (range 17-72 years). The median tumor size was 1.2 cm (range: 0.13-3.93 cm). All resected tumors showed positivity for somatotrophic hormone (STH). In all tissue samples, SSTR2a signal expression was detectable in immunohistochemistry, while only 39 samples were positive for SSTR5. Thirty-six samples had a high expression of SSTR2a, while three had a moderate and four a low SSTR2a signal. In comparison, SSTR5 signal was high in 26 out of 43 samples, while seven adenomas showed a moderate and six cases a low expression rate of SSTR5. The median IGF-1 was 714.2 µg/l and the median GH 19.6 mU/l (= 6.53 µg/l). The present study indicates that there is no significant relationship between the expression rates of receptor subtypes and the parameters we analyzed. However, our study revealed that smaller adenomas have a lower baseline GH level (p = 0.015), CONCLUSION: IHC with monoclonal antibodies appears to be a suitable method to determine the expression rates of SSTR2a and 5 at protein levels, as it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding receptor subtypes solely on the basis of the parameters analyzed.

Role of Somatostatin Signalling in Neuroendocrine Tumours

Somatostatin (SST) is a small peptide that exerts inhibitory effects on a wide range of neuroendocrine cells. Due to the fact that somatostatin regulates cell growth and hormone secretion, somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) have become valuable targets for the treatment of different types of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). NETs are a heterogeneous group of tumours that can develop in various parts of the body, including the digestive system, lungs, and pituitary. NETs are usually slow growing, but they are often diagnosed in advanced stages and can display aggressive behaviour. The mortality rate of NETs is not outstandingly increased compared to other malignant tumours, even in the metastatic setting. One of the intrinsic properties of NETs is the expression of SSTRs that serve as drug targets for SST analogues (SSAs), which can delay tumour progression and downregulate hormone overproduction. Additionally, in many NETs, it has been demonstrated that the SSTR expression level provides a prognostic value in predicting a therapeutic response. Furthermore, higher a SSTR expression correlates with a better survival rate in NET patients. In recent studies, other epigenetic regulators affecting SST signalling or SSA–mTOR inhibitor combination therapy in NETs have been considered as novel strategies for tumour control. In conclusion, SST signalling is a relevant regulator of NET functionality. Alongside classical SSA treatment regimens, future advanced therapies and treatment modalities are expected to improve the disease outcomes and overall health of NET patients.

Association of Pathology Markers with Somatostatin Analogue Responsiveness in Acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatotroph adenomas (SAs) exhibit a variable responsiveness to somatostatin analogue (SS-a) treatment, a process that is not well understood. We investigated established and novel histological markers as predictors of SS-a responsiveness.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated pathology samples from 36 acromegalic patients that underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Clinical, hormonal, and imaging data were available in 24/36 patients, before and after SS-a treatment. Specimens were semiquantitatively analyzed with immunocytochemistry for Ki-67, KER, SSTR-2, SSTR-5, ZAC-1, E-cadherin, and AIP.

RESULTS

Collectively, 18 (50%) adenomas were each classified as densely/sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas (DGSAs/SGSAs), respectively. Patients that received preoperative SS-a had lower expression of SSTR-2 compared to those that did not (2.0 (1.0, 3.0) vs. 3.0 (3.0, 3.0), p = 0.042). Compared with DGSAs, SGSAs had higher Ki-67 labeling index (LI) (1.0 (0.5, 1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 3.5), p = 0.013), and a higher proportion of high MR T2 signal (1 (6%) vs. 6 (33%), p = 0.035), and tended to express less ZAC-1 (p = 0.061) and E-cadherin (p = 0.067). In linear regression corrected for baseline growth hormone (GH), ZAC-1 immunostaining was significantly associated with a decrease in GH levels after SS-a treatment (beta (95% confidence interval): -1.53 (-2.80, -0.26), p = 0.021). No markers were associated with changes in circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) after treatment with SS-a.

CONCLUSION

The novel marker ZAC-1 was associated with GH response to medical treatment with SS-a. The SGSA cases were characterized by higher Ki-67 values and MR T2 signals indicative of an inferior response to SS-a. These findings improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying SA response to medical treatment.

Somatostatin Receptor Subtype Expression in Patients with Acromegaly and Complicated Clinical Course

Somatostatin analogues are considered to be the first line of treatment in acromegaly. Somatostatin analogues of the first generation mainly target the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype 2 and have been proven efficient in the majority of patients with acromegaly. Pasireotide was the first somatostatin analogue also substantially targeting the SSTR subtype 5. An efficient drug for Cushing’s disease tailored to suboptimal-responding patients with acromegaly then became available. We immunohistochemically investigated SSTR subtypes expression in pituitary adenomas from operated acromegaly patients with clinical relapse and a complicated clinical course. Patients received pasireotide in the course of their disease. The predictive value of SSTR subtypes immunhistochemical analysis for the therapeutic response is discussed.

Clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological comparison of sparsely and densely granulated somatotroph adenomas: a single center experience from a cohort of 131 patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas are divided into two clinically relevant histologic subtypes, densely (DG-A) and sparsely (SG-A) granulated. Histologic subtype was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with acromegaly, separating DG-A and SG-A, and correlated with clinicopathological characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly undergoing surgery as initial therapy between 1995 and 2015 were identified. Histologic subtype was determined by keratin expression pattern with CAM5.2 and correlated with clinical and imaging parameters, somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SST2) expression, post-surgical remission rate, and application of a prognostic scoring system incorporating proliferation and invasiveness.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-one patients were included. Tumors were classified as DG-A (75, 57.3%), SG-A (29, 22.1%), intermediate (I-A) (9, 6.9%), and unclassified (18, 13.7%) when CAM5.2 was negative. DG-A and I-A were combined for analysis (DG/I-A) and compared to SG-A. Age, gender, proliferation, and post-surgical remission did not differ. SG-A were larger [2 vs. 1.5 cm (median), p = 0.03], more frequently invasive [65.5% vs. 32.9%, p = 0.004], associated with higher MRI T2-weighted signal ratio [1.01 vs. 0.82 (median), p = 0.01], showed lower SST2 expression (p < 0.0001), and scored higher in the prognostic classification (p = 0.004). Surgical remission occurred in 41.7% DG/I-A and 41.4% SG-A (p = 1.0). On multivariate analysis, absence of invasion (p = 0.009) and lower pre-operative IGF-1 index (p = 0.0002) were associated with post-surgical remission.

CONCLUSION

CAM5.2 allowed distinction between DG/I-A and SG-A in most but not all cases. Histologic subtype did not predict surgical outcome. Absence of invasion and lower pre-operative IGF-1 index were the only significant predictors of post-surgical remission in this cohort.

Somatostatin receptors in normal and acromegalic somatotroph cells: the U-turn of the clinician to immunohistochemistry report - a review

This is a narrative review of literature introducing somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) as part of understanding the somatotroph cells since they are positive in normal cells but also in tumoral cells as seen in somatotropinoma, a growth hormone (GH)-producing neoplasia, which causes acromegaly. They are five subtypes of SSTRs (1 to 5), which are immunohistochemically positive in different proportions in somatotropinomas. SSTR types 2 and 5 are most frequent in GH-secreting adenomas and they are both targeted by medical therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSTAs) like first generation Octreotide and Lanreotide (mainly targeting SSTR2) and second generation Pasireotide (with highest affinity for SSTR5), thus heterogeneous SSTRs configuration into the tumor explains different pattern of response to treatment and it might predict it once the SSTRs immunostaining is performed. Monoclonal antibodies are used for immunohistochemical detection of SSTRs; currently, a lack of standardization is presented, and scoring systems, such as Volante, H-score or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-score, are applied. Immunoreactive markers like SSTRs are the U-turn in clinical practice regarding somatotropinomas since the configuration of subtypes 2 and 5 explains the responsiveness to medical therapy like SSTA. Further achievement of disease control is imperiously necessary because acromegaly has an increased rate of morbidity and mortality.

Somatostatin receptor expression and patients' response to targeted medical treatment in pituitary tumors: evidences and controversies

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are widely co-expressed in pituitary tumors. SST₂ and SST₅ are the most represented SST subtypes. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) mainly target SST₂, while pasireotide, a multi-receptor ligand, shows high binding affinity for both SST₅ and SST₂. Therefore, SRLs are routinely used as medical treatment for GH-, TSH-, and ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.

METHODS

Critical revision of literature data correlating SST expression with patients' response to SRLs.

RESULTS

SST₂ expression in somatroph tumors directly correlates with GH and IGF-1 decrease after first-generation SRL treatment. SST₂ immunohistochemistry represents a valuable tool to predict biochemical response to first-generation SRLs in acromegalic patients. Pasireotide seems to exert its biological effects via SST₂ in unselected patients. However, in those subjects resistant to first-generation SRLs, harbouring tumors with negligible SST₂ expression, pasireotide can act throughout SST₅. More than somatotroph tumors, TSH-omas represent the paradigm of tumors showing a satisfactory response to SRLs. This is probably due to the high SST₂ expression observed in nearly 100% of cases, as well as to the balanced amount of SST₅. In corticotroph tumors, pasireotide mainly act via SST₅, although there is a need for translational studies correlating its efficacy with SST expression in this peculiar tumor histotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The assumption "more target receptor, more drug efficacy" is not straightforward for SRLs. The complex pathophysiology of SSTs, and the technical challenges faced to translate research findings into clinical practice, still need our full commitment to make receptor evaluation a worthwhile procedure for individualizing treatment decisions.

Effects of Pegvisomant and Pasireotide LAR on Vertebral Fractures in Acromegaly Resistant to First-generation SRLs

PURPOSE

Osteopathy is an emerging complication of acromegaly. In somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL)-resistant patients, pegvisomant (PegV) and pasireotide LAR (Pasi) are used for acromegaly treatment, but their effect on skeletal health is still not defined.

METHODS

In a longitudinal retrospective international study, we evaluated incidence of radiological vertebral fractures (VFs) in 55 patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation SRL.

RESULTS

At study entry, prevalent VFs occurred in 23 patients (41.8%). Biochemical acromegaly control was reached in 66.7% of patients on PegV and in 66.7% of patients on Pasi. During the follow-up, incident VFs (iVFs) were detected in 16 patients (29.1%). Occurrence of iVFs was associated with prevalent VFs (P = .002), persistence of active acromegaly (P = .01) and higher value of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) during follow-up (P = .03). Among patients with active disease at last visit, iVFs occurred less frequently in patients on treatment with Pasi (25%) compared to PegV (77.8% P = .04), independently of the IGF-1 values (P = .90). In patients who reached biochemical control, 22.7% on PegV and 12.5% on Pasi had iVFs (P = .40). Among both treatment groups, the presence of pre-existent VFs was the main determinant for iVFs.

CONCLUSION

Our data show for the first time that patients with biochemically active disease treated with Pasi had lower risk of iVFs versus those treated with PegV. It also confirms that the presence of pre-existent VFs was the main determinant for iVFs. Additional studies on larger populations and with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our data and disclose the mechanisms underlying our findings.

Somatostatin Analogs in Clinical Practice: a Review

Somatostatin analogs are an invaluable therapeutic option in the diagnosis and treatment of somatotropinomas, thyrotropinomas, and functioning and non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. They should also be considered an effective and safe therapeutic alternative to corticotropinomas, gonadotropinomas, and prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists. Somatostatin analogs have also shown to be useful in the treatment of other endocrine diseases (congenital hyperinsulinism, Graves’ orbitopathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema), non-endocrine tumors (breast, colon, prostate, lung, and hepatocellular), and digestive diseases (chronic refractory diarrhea, hepatorenal polycystosis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, dumping syndrome, and intestinal fistula).

Genetic and Epigenetic Causes of Pituitary Adenomas

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) can be classified as non-secreting adenomas, somatotroph adenomas, corticotroph adenomas, lactotroph adenomas, and thyrotroph adenomas. Substantial advances have been made in our knowledge of the pathobiology of PAs. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the molecular biological characteristics of different types of PAs, we reviewed the important advances that have been made involving genetic and epigenetic variation, comprising genetic mutations, chromosome number variations, DNA methylation, microRNA regulation, and transcription factor regulation. Classical tumor predisposition syndromes include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4) syndromes, Carney complex, and X-LAG syndromes. PAs have also been described in association with succinate dehydrogenase-related familial PA, neurofibromatosis type 1, and von Hippel-Lindau, DICER1, and Lynch syndromes. Patients with aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations often present with pituitary gigantism, either in familial or sporadic adenomas. In contrast, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(s) subunit alpha (GNAS) and G protein-coupled receptor 101 (GPR101) mutations can lead to excess growth hormone. Moreover, the deubiquitinase gene USP8, USP48, and BRAF mutations are associated with adrenocorticotropic hormone production. In this review, we describe the genetic and epigenetic landscape of PAs and summarize novel insights into the regulation of pituitary tumorigenesis.

Pasireotide Responsiveness in Acromegaly Is Mainly Driven by Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Expression

BACKGROUND

The response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) treatment in acromegaly correlates with expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2). However, pasireotide shows the highest binding affinity for SSTR subtype 5 (SSTR5). It has been suggested that in acromegaly, SSTR5 expression is better at predicting the response to pasireotide long-acting release (PAS-LAR) treatment than SSTR2 expression.

AIM

To investigate in patients with active acromegaly whether response to SRL treatment correlates to PAS-LAR treatment and to what extent SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression are correlated to the response to PAS-LAR treatment.

METHODS

We included 52 patients from a cohort that initially received SRL treatment, followed by SRL and pegvisomant combination treatment, and finally PAS-LAR treatment. The long-term response to PAS-LAR was evaluated using a PAS-LAR score. In 14 out of 52 patients, somatotroph adenoma tissue samples were available to evaluate SSTR2 and SSTR5 expression using a previously validated immunoreactivity score (IRS).

RESULTS

The percentage IGF-I (times the upper limit of normal) reduction, which was observed after SRL treatment, correlated with PAS-LAR response score during follow-up (r = 0.40; P = 0.003; n = 52). After exclusion of SRL-pretreated patients, SSTR2 IRS was positively correlated to PAS-LAR score (r = 0.58; P = 0.039; n = 9), whereas SSTR5 IRS showed no relation (r = 0.35; P = 0.36; n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients partially responsive to SRLs, the IGF-I-lowering effects of PAS-LAR treatment correlated with the effect of SRL treatment and seemed to be mainly driven by SSTR2 expression instead of SSTR5.

Clinical significance of filamin A in patients with acromegaly and its association with somatostatin and dopamine receptor profiles

Filamin-A (FLNA) plays a crucial role in somatostatin receptor (sst) subtype-2 signaling in somatotropinomas. Our objective was to investigate the in vivo association between FLNA and sst2 expression, sst5 expression, dopamine receptor subtype-2 (D2) expression, somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) responsiveness and tumor invasiveness in somatotropinomas. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to evaluate the absolute mRNA copy numbers of FLNA/sst2/sst5/D2 in 96 somatotropinomas. FLNA, sst2 and sst5 protein expression levels were also evaluated using immunohistochemistry. The Knosp-Steiner criteria were used to evaluate tumor invasiveness. Median FLNA, sst2, sst5 and D2 copy numbers were 4,244, 731, 156 and 3,989, respectively. Thirty-one of the 35 available tumors (89%) were immune positive for FLNA in the cytoplasm and membrane but not in the nucleus. FLNA and sst5 expression were positively correlated at the mRNA and protein levels (p < 0.001 and p = 0.033, respectively). FLNA was positively correlated with sst2 mRNA in patients who were responsive to SRL (p = 0.014, R = 0.659). No association was found between FLNA and tumor invasiveness. Our findings show that in somatotropinomas FLNA expression positively correlated with in vivo sst5 and D2 expression. Notably, FLNA was only correlated with sst2 in patients who were controlled with SRL. FLNA was not associated with tumor invasiveness.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is associated with high morbidity and elevated mortality when not adequately treated. Surgery is the first-line treatment for most patients as it is the only one that can lead to immediate cure. In patients who are not cured by surgery, treatment is currently based on a trial-and-error approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are initiated for most patients, although approximately 25% of patients present resistance to this drug class. Some biomarkers of treatment outcome are described in the literature, with the aim of categorizing patients into different groups to individualize their treatments using a personalized approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status of precision medicine for the treatment of acromegaly and future perspectives on the use of personalized medicine for this purpose.