The Role of White Matter Damage in the Risk of Periprocedural Diffusion-Weighted Lesions after Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid Artery Stenting versus Carotid Endarterectomy in Terms of Neuroprotection DW-MRI Detected and Neuropsychological Assessment Impairment

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is well issue known, but the purpose of this study is to compare CAS versus CEA in terms of asymptomatic Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction and neuropsychological assessment impairment.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 211 consecutive carotid revascularizations at our institution. Patients were divided into 2 different cohorts: CEA was performed in n = 116 patients (Group A); CAS was performed in n = 95 (Group B). Adverse events were collected at 30 days and 6 months postoperative. Differences in terms of DW-MRI demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction were analyzed and considered significative for P ≤ 0.05. Secondary objectives were: major and minor stroke, neuropsychological assessment impairment, death, myocardial infarction (MI).

RESULTS

CEA was associated with a significative decreased rate of asymptomatic DW-MRI demonstrated microembolic scattering of infarction (13.8% vs. 51%; P = 0.0001) and of 6 months neuropsychological assessments impairment (0.8 vs. 7.4) (P = 0.04) in asymptomatic patients. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in terms of comorbidities. Stroke rates were similar at 30 days (1.7% CEA vs. 4.1% CAS) and 6 months (2.6% CEA vs. 5.3% CAS P = 0.32). There were no differences in terms of central neurological events, death, transient ischemic attack, MI between the groups. The composite end point of stroke/death/MI at 6 months postoperatively was 2.6% vs. 6.3% (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

According to these results, CEA achieved better outcomes compared to patients treated by CAS with distal filter in terms of asymptomatic microembolic event and impairment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scale and neuropsychological assessments. Limitations of the study lead to limited conclusions only in the specific population and not generalized. Further, comparative randomized studies are warranted.

Silent brain infarcts after carotid or vertebrobasilar artery stenting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stenting is an important treatment for preventing stroke. However, the effect of vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) might be limited because of relatively high periprocedural risks. Silent brain infarcts (SBIs) are known as a predictor for future stroke. Because of anatomical differences, factors for SBIs might be different between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and VBS. We compared the characteristics of SBIs between VBS and CAS.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent elective VBS or CAS. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed pre- and post-procedure to detect new SBIs. Clinical variables, occurrence of SBIs, and procedure-related factors were compared between CAS and VBS. Moreover, we investigated predictors of SBIs in each group separately.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (34.2%) out of 269 patients had SBIs. SBIs were more frequently observed in VBS (29 [56.6%] vs. 63 [28.9%], p<.001). The risk of SBIs outside the stent-inserted vascular territory was higher in VBS compared to CAS (14 [48.3%] vs. 8 [12.7%], p<.001). Larger-diameter stents (odds ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.54, p = .012) and prolonged procedure time (1.01, [1.00-1.03], p = .026) increased the risk of SBIs in CAS, whereas only age increased the risk of SBIs in VBS (1.08 [1.01-1.16], p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to CAS, VBS was associated with longer procedure time, more residual stenosis, and more SBIs, especially outside the stent-inserted vascular territory. The risk of SBIs after CAS was associated with stent size and procedural difficulty. Only age was associated with SBIs in VBS. The pathomechanism of SBIs after VBS and CAS may be different.

Risk factors for new ischemic cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

New ischemic cerebral lesions (NICL) are commonly occur after carotid artery stenting (CAS) with an incidence rate ranging from 18-58% and are detected by diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI). Numerous studies have reported that NICL could increase the risk of future cerebrovascular events and cognitive impairment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for NICL after CAS.

METHODS

Relevant literature reporting risk factors for NICL after CAS were searched. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, or cohort studies were included in accordance with the pre-specified eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and the quality of evidence was assessed with the corresponding scale. Data were analyzed using the RevMan V. 5.3 analysis software.

RESULTS

The final analyses included a total of 21 studies and 1907 participants, including 764 NICL-positives and 1143 NICL-negatives. Determinants for NICL-positivity were age (mean deviation (MD): 2.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1.53-3.68]), symptomatic carotid lesions (odds ratio (OR): 1.77; 95% CI: [1.39-2.25]) and smoking (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: [0.58-0.94]). For symptomatic patients, risk factors for NICL-positive included diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: [1.09-2.82]), but smoking (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: [0.31-0.93]) was a protective factor. Risk factors for centers with high NICL incidence were age (MD: 2.05; 95% CI: [0.93-3.17]) and symptomatic carotid lesions (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: [1.29-2.45]).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age and symptomatic carotid lesions are associated with an increased risk of post-CAS NICL whereas smoking is associated with a decreased risk. Risk factors for NICL in symptomatic patients is diabetes mellitus, while those for patients at centers with high incidence are age and symptomatic carotid lesions. Systematic review registration: CRD42019121129.

Relationship between Deep White Matter Hyperintensities on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Postoperative Cognitive Function Following Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm

To evaluate the effects on cognitive function of deep white matter hyperintensities (DWMHs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients treated surgically for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). The subjects were 106 patients in whom a Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised (WAIS-R) examination was performed 1 week before and 1 month after clipping surgery for asymptomatic UIAs. DWMH severity was evaluated on preoperative MR images by Fazekas scale, as follows: none (absence), mild (punctate foci), moderate (beginning confluence of foci), or severe (large confluent areas). A decrease of 7 or more points in intelligence quotient (IQ) postoperatively was considered deterioration. Fazekas score was none in 41 (none group), mild in 42 (mild group), moderate in 21, and severe in 2 patients (moderate/severe group). Patient characteristics, surgical factors, IQ change, and abnormal findings on postoperative MRI were compared among the groups. Although there was no statistically significant deterioration in IQ postoperatively in any group, the percentage of deteriorated patients was significantly higher in the moderate/severe group (34.8%) than in the other groups (4.9% in the none group, 7.1% in the mild group; p <0.01, p <0.05, respectively). Brain injury was observed more frequently on postoperative MR images in the moderate/severe group (17.4%) compared with the none group (2.4%; p = 0.052). The presence of moderate/severe DWMHs was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative cognitive dysfunction. In conclusion, the presence of moderate/severe DWMHs was a prognostic factor for postoperative cognitive dysfunction after surgery for UIAs.

Age and the risk of new ischemic lesions on diffusion weighted imaging after carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to show the association between age and the risk of new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) after carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis. We searched PubMed and EMBASE from their dates of inception to March 14, 2019 for eligible studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the association between age and new DWI lesions. Sensitivity analysis was performed to detect the possible source of heterogeneity. Twenty-three studies enrolling 2127 patients were included. The incidence of new DWI lesions was 62% in older patients and 41% in younger patient (OR 2.44, 95%CI 1.57-3.79; p < 0.0001). The patients with new DWI lesions were older than those without (SMD 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.39; p = 0.003). The risk of new DWI lesions increased by 1.07 per added year (95%CI 1.04-1.11, p < 0.0001). The results remained stable in sensitivity analyses and after adjusting for publication bias. It was concluded that older age was at higher risk of new DWI lesions after stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis.

WIRION™ embolic protection system for carotid artery stenting and lower extremity endovascular intervention

Aim: To summarize all available literature regarding the Wirion™ embolic protection system (EPS) and present examples from our center. Materials & methods: A review of literture was performed about the utilization of Wirion EPS. Results: One study was identified investigating the outcomes of Wirion during carotid artery stenting. The study demonstrated 98.3% procedural success with stroke occurring in only 2.5%. Two single arm studies were identified investigating the efficacy of the Wirion filter during lower extremity endovascular interventions. The reported device success ranged from 95.1 to 97.3%. Conclusion: While carotid artery stenting should always be performed with adjunctive EPS in order to decrease the risk of cerebrovascular accidents, the routine use of EPS in femorpopliteal interventions remains an active area of investigation.

Risk factors for new ischaemic cerebral lesions after carotid artery stenting: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

New ischaemic cerebral lesions (NICL) detected by diffusion-weighted imaging MRI are common after carotid artery stenting (CAS), with an occurrence rate ranging from 18% to 57%. Many studies reported occurrence of NICL could increase risk of future cerebrovascular events and cognitive impairment. However, controversies about determinants for occurrence of NICL after CAS exist among studies, and one risk factor embodied in an article may not be in another. Aim of this study is to introduce a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors associated with occurrence of NICL after CAS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All relevant literature referring to risk factors for occurrence of NICL after CAS will be searched on the major databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library until 31 December 2018. Literature, which must be randomised controlled trials, case-control studies or cohort studies, will be included in accordance with the prespecified eligibility criteria. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and the quality of evidence will be assessed with the corresponding scale. Data will be extracted with a form prepared before and analysed using RevMan V.5.3 analyses software. Heterogeneity will be assessed using I² statistic. Our systematic review will be performed according to the guidance from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

There is no need for ethical approval because primary data will not be attained. The systematic review will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019121129.