Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Esophagus: An NCDB-Based Investigation on Comparative Features and Overall Survival in a Rare Tumor

Experience with chemotherapy for postoperative metastases of adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and pathological study of its development

We report here a case of postoperative recurrent adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) treated with S-1 therapy. A 79-year-old woman was diagnosed with carcinoma of the EGJ. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy was performed, and pathological examination revealed advanced ASC with lymph node metastasis. Five months after surgery, multiple lung metastases and multiple lymph node metastases were observed, and the patient was treated with S-1 monotherapy, which showed partial response and may be effective for advanced ASC of the EGJ. On the other hand, immunohistological analysis of the tumors showed a relatively wide range of areas that could differentiate into both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting that tumor cells with multidifferentiation potential, or at least the ability to differentiate into both adeno-epithelial and squamous epithelial cells, were the likely source of the tumors.

Clinical-Pathological Characteristics of Adenosquamous Esophageal Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score-Matching Study

There are few studies on esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ADSC). Our study intended to investigate the clinical and survival features of ADSC. We included esophageal cancer (EC) data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database to explore clinical and survival traits. Propensity score matching (PSM), the multivariate Cox regression model, and survival curves were used in this study. A total of 137 patients with ADSC were included in our analysis. The proportion of ADSC within the EC cohort declined from 2004 to 2018. Besides, results indicated no significant difference in survival between ADSC and SCC groups (PSM-adjusted HR = 1.249, P = 0.127). However, the survival rate of the ADSC group was significantly worse than that of the ADC group (PSM-adjusted HR = 1.497, P = 0.007). For the ADSC group, combined treatment with surgery had a higher survival rate than other treatment methods (all P < 0.001). Surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were independent protective prognostic factors (all P < 0.05). The proportion of ADSC has been declining from 2004 to 2018. The prognosis of ADSC is not significantly different from that of SCC but is worse than that of ADC. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of patients. Comprehensive treatment with surgery as the main treatment is more beneficial for some patients.

Epidemiology and survival outcomes in adenosquamous carcinoma: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the location of the primary tumor and survival of adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of primary tumor location on the survival outcome of patients with ASC.

METHODS

Patients with ASC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with ≥ 150 cases per tumor location. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves and differences among them were compared using the log-rank test. On the other hand, Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors that had independent predictive effects on cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 14,829 eligible patients with ASC were included in this study. Lung and bronchus ASC accounted for 51.1%, followed by the cervix uteri (17.0%), corpus uteri (13.9%), pancreas (4.9%), esophagus (3.1%), gallbladder (2.5%), stomach (2.2%), colon and rectum (2.0%), head and neck (1.8%), and breast ASC (1.3%). The 5-year CSS of breast, cervix uteri, colon and rectum, corpus uteri, esophagus, gallbladder, head and neck, lung and bronchus, pancreas, and stomach ASC was 76.9%, 66.0%, 34.8%, 72.9%, 12.0%, 10.8%, 45.0%, 24.7%, 4.3%, and 17.3%, respectively. COX analysis demonstrated that the primary tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for CSS. Besides, the breast, uterine corpus, and cervix as well as head and neck ASC were significantly associated with better prognosis, while pancreas and gallbladder ASC were significantly associated with poor CSS; stomach and colorectal were roughly the same as ASC prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the CSS of patients with ASC depends on the location of the primary tumor. Besides, tumor location is an important factor that should guide the use of chemotherapy and radiation.

Surgical resection for esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma: an analysis of 56 cases

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (EASC) is a rare disease. The biological behavior and treatment of this malignancy are not well studied.

METHODS

Data from 56 patients with EASC who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 5028 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The impact of clinicopathological factors on the survival of patients with EASC was analyzed. The survival differences between patients with EASC and ESCC were also compared.

RESULTS

There were 43 males and 13 females with a mean age of 59.7 ± 1.3 years (range, 39-79 years). Only 1 of the 43 patients who received preoperative esophagoscopic biopsy was diagnosed with EASC. The median survival time for patients with EASC was 32.0 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 78.3%, 46.1%, and 29.6%, respectively. Resection margin, pN category, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be independent predictors. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the 5-year overall survival rate of 29.6% for patients with EASC was similar to that of 42.5% for patients with ESCC (P = 0.179).

CONCLUSIONS

EASC is a rare disease and is easily misdiagnosed by esophagoscopic biopsy. The prognosis of EASC was similar to that of ESCC. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the survival of patients with EASC after esophagectomy.

A case report of adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

Many types of tumors can arise in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) arising from the esophageal epithelia, adenocarcinoma arising from the gastric mucosa, or Barrett's esophageal mucosa are frequently observed in the EGJ. However, adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) has been rarely observed in this area. We herein report a rare case of ASC of the EGJ.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 81-year-old man visited our hospital complaining of dysphagia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy detected an elevated tumor in the gastric cardia. Biopsy specimens taken from the tumor showed SCC. Computed tomography revealed a tumor located in the EGJ and node metastases surrounding the EGJ. The tumor was diagnosed as SCC, overhanging in the stomach, of the EGJ. The patient underwent a proximal gastrectomy with a lower esophagectomy and node dissection for the metastases surrounding the EGJ, and esophagogastrostomy in the lower mediastinum. Histopathologic examination showed the tumor consisted of SCC and adenocarcinoma. The adenocarcinoma consisted of nests scattered in the SCC. We observed adenocarcinoma component in 35% of the tumor and epithelial spread of SCC in the lower esophagus. Thus, we diagnosed the tumor as ASC of the EGJ. Eight metastatic nodes were dissected; both SCC and adenocarcinoma were observed in seven.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present case, SCC may be originated from the squamous epithelia of the lower esophagus and grew into the stomach, and the adenocarcinoma may have differentiated from SCC through the infiltration.

Neoplastic and pre-neoplastic lesions of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction

Oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) neoplasms, and their predisposing conditions, may be encountered by the practicing pathologist both as biopsy samples and as surgical specimens in daily practice. Changes in incidence of oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas (such as a decrease in western countries) and in oesophageal and GOJ adenocarcinomas (such as a sharp increase in western countries) are being reported globally. New modes of treatment have changed our histologic reports as specific aspects must be detailed such as in post endoscopic resections or with regards to post neo-adjuvant therapy tumour regression grades. The main aim of this overview is therefore to provide an up-to-date, easily available and clear diagnostic approach to neoplastic and pre-neoplastic conditions of the oesophagus and GOJ, based on the most recent available guidelines and literature.

Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis, and Nomogram for Esophageal Cancer Based on Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis

Objective: Esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is a rare pathological type of cancer. Its clinical features and prognosis is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of ASC patients and analyze the risk factors of esophageal carcinoma.

Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer in the SEER database diagnosed from 1975–2016 were obtained. The epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between these three groups were compared. The nomogram and online dynamic nomogram were constructed according to the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: The age-adjusted incidences of AC (1975–1999), AC (1999–2016), and ASC (1975–1989) increased over time (p < 0.05). Age-adjusted incidences of SqCC (1986–2012) and ASC (1989–2016) decreased (p < 0.05). Survival of patients with ASC was significantly worse when compared to AC and SqCC (ASC vs. AC, p < 0.001, ASC vs. SqCC, p = 0.01). ASC, older age, black race, male, overlapping site, higher tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, and a higher summary stage or AJCC stage were considered to be risk factors for a poor survival in the multivariate Cox analysis. The ROC curves and AUC indicated that the model has a good discrimination ability (AUC were 0.774 for a 3-year OS and 0.782 for a 5-year OS). An online dynamic nomogram was built based on the Cox proportional hazard model for convenient clinical use.

Conclusions: ASC is somewhat closer to AC rather than SqCC in terms of the demographics and tumor site, but has a worse OS than both AC and SqCC.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the digestive system: a literature review

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), containing both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma components, is rare in the digestive system. Limited data is available on ASC of the digestive system (AS-ASC), and the current evidence is available mainly in the form of case reports and case series. We performed a thorough search of the available literature and compiled a review on the epidemiology, histopathology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of AS-ASC. Non-specific clinical and imaging presentations and low diagnostic accuracy of biopsy lead to difficulties in preoperative diagnosis in a high proportion of patients and high malignancy. The pathogenesis remains obscure. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for AS-ASC. The role of chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment is still inconclusive. Key messages Metastatic linings and the lack of efficacious treatments lead to an unfavorable outcome in AS-ASC patients. Further research could help us understand the pathophysiology of AS-ASCand the unique needs of AS-ASC patients.

Increased proportion of the squamous cell carcinoma component is associated with worse survival in resected gastric adenosquamous carcinoma: A STROBE compliant cohort study

For the diagnosis of gastric adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), discrepancies regarding a rational diagnostic proportion of the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) component exist among different organizations. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the SCC component on the survival of gastric cancer patients and identify the optimal cutoff value for the SCC component necessary for diagnosing gastric ASC.Cases of gastric cancer with an SCC component were obtained from our center and from case reports and series extracted from Medline. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the overall survival between groups and examine the prognostic value of various clinical parameters.We identified 45 qualified cases in published literature and 13 in our center. Forty-two of them were males and 16 females (M: F = 2.6:1). Thirty of them were Asian patients and the rest were mainly from the United States and Europe. The mean age was 61.1 years (median 64 years, range 32-84 years). The average tumor size was 6.9 cm (median 6.0 cm, range 2.0-16.0 cm). The most common location of the cancer was the lower third (39.7%). Although a statistical difference was not achieved, the Kaplan-Meier curve demonstrated that as the proportion of the SCC component in the primary lesion increased, the patients' survival risk increased (P = .489), and the presence of the SCC component in metastatic lymph nodes also increased the risk of survival (P = .259); both of these findings indicated a negative impact of the SCC component on survival. Furthermore, we identified the optimal cutoff for the SCC component as 35% (χ = 6.544, P = .011), which was subsequently validated in a Cox regression model as an independent prognostic factor (P = .026).An increased proportion of the SCC component is associated with worse survival in gastric cancer patients with an SCC component. The optimal cutoff for the proportion of the SCC component necessary for the diagnosis of gastric ASC is 35%.

Should adenosquamous esophageal cancer be treated like adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have distinct outcomes, treatment strategies, and response profiles to therapy. Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is thought to behave more aggressively than each of its counterparts. The aim of this study is to determine ifASC is best managed as AC or SCC.

METHODS

National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was queried for patients with nonmetastatic esophageal ASC. The analysis was stratified by clinical node-negative (cN0) or clinical node-positive (cN1-3). Treatment was categorized into chemoradiation alone, surgery alone, or preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 352 patients, 43% were cN0 (n = 151), 57% were cN1-3 (n = 201) and 55% had chemoradiation alone (n = 194), 15% surgery alone (n = 53), and 30% preoperative chemoradiation (n = 105). Among patients who had preoperative chemoradiation, 20% had pathologic complete response (n = 17). For either cN0 or cN1-3, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index did not differ among the treatment groups(all p > 0.05). On Kaplan-Meier analysis for cN0, treatment with surgery alone had comparable OS to preoperative chemoradiation (47% vs 34%; P = .5) and each had improved OS compared to chemoradiation alone (30%; P = .02; P = .06). On univariate analysis for cN0, clinical T category was not associated with OS. For cN1-3, however, preoperative chemoradiation was associated with improved OS when compared to chemoradiation alone or surgery alone (27% vs 19% vs 0%; P < .001). This persisted when accounting for age and clinical T category (hazard ratio: 0.45; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal ASC behaves more like AC in response to chemoradiation and survival based on treatment modality. A complete response to chemoradiation is only 20% unlike what has been shown for SCC, where chemoradiation is an acceptable definitive therapy. Esophageal ASC should be managed more like AC.

Identification of Adenosquamous Carcinoma as a Rare Aggressive HER2-negative Subgroup of Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to evaluate the prognostic impact of pathologically confirmed esophageal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and its association with HER2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics.

METHODS

Among 796 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection, surgical pathology reports were reviewed, and suspected ASC was confirmed utilizing p63 and CK5/6 immunostaining. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox models were used to assess the impact of ASC on disease-specific survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 2.0% (16/796) of patients had esophageal ASC, mostly demonstrating a close intermingling of squamous and adenocarcinoma cells within the same tumor. The percentage of squamous versus adenocarcinoma cells in the primary was generally recapitulated in nodal metastases, and intrapatient internodal heterogeneity was uncommon. Patients with esophageal ASC were statistically significantly more likely to be female (vs. male), have normal (vs. excess) body mass index, and harbor HER2-negative (vs. positive) tumors, as compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only. No ASC tumor was HER2-positive as compared with 16% of adenocarcinoma only tumors (P=0.018). Compared with patients with adenocarcinoma only, those with ASC demonstrated profoundly worse disease-specific survival (5-year event-free rate, 34% vs. 6%; multivariate hazard ratio, 2.87 [95% confidence interval, 1.59-4.76]; P=0.0010) and overall survival (P=0.0027) that was independent of known prognostic factors and HER2 status.

CONCLUSION

ASC identifies a rare aggressive HER2-negative subgroup of esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Literature Review

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the esophagus is an uncommon type of esophageal cancer that contains both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma elements. Data on this biologically unique type of cancer are limited and mainly stem from case reports and small case series. We performed an audit of the available literature and synthesized a review on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of ASCs. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare type of esophageal cancer. Histological examination is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of ASC and patients usually receive multimodal treatment. Patient outcomes are not well defined and further research could help us better understand the pathophysiology and unique needs of patients with this rare malignancy.