Extinction of Contextual Fear with Timed Exposure to Enriched Environment: A Differential Effect

The systemic effects of the enriched environment on the conditioned fear reaction

In this review, a hypothesis is proposed to explain the beneficial effect of an enriched environment (EE) on the conditioned fear reaction (CFR) from the perspective of a functional system of behavioral control. According to the hypothesis, the EE affects all behavioral act components, including the processing of sensory information, memory, motivational and reinforcing systems, and motor activities, which weakens the CFR. Animals raised in the EE have effects that are comparable to those of context (CTX) and CS pre-exposures at latent inhibition. An abundance of stimuli in the EE and constant contact with them provide the formation of CS-noUS and CTX-noUS connections that later, during CFR learning, slow down and diminish fear. The EE also contributes to faster processing of information and habituation to it. As a result, many stimuli in the context lose their significance, and subjects simply ignore them. And finally, the EE affects the motivational and reinforcing brain mechanisms, induces an impairment of search activity, and worsens memory consolidation, which leads to a reduction of CFR.

Hippocampal Administration of Levothyroxine Impairs Contextual Fear Memory Consolidation in Rats

Thyroid hormone (TH) receptors are highly distributed in the hippocampus, which plays a vital role in memory processes. However, how THs are involved in the different stages of memory process is little known. Herein, we used hippocampus dependent contextual fear conditioning to address the effects of hippocampal THs on the different stages of fear memory. First, we found that a single systemic levothyroxine (LT₄) administration increased the level of free triiodothyronine (FT₃) and free tetraiodothyroxine (FT₄) not only in serum but also in hippocampus. In addition, a single systemic LT₄ administration immediately after fear conditioning significantly impaired fear memory. These results indicated the important role of hippocampal THs in fear memory process. To further confirm the effects of hippocampal THs on the different stages of fear memory, LT₄ (0.4 μg/μl, 1 μl/side) was injected bilaterally into hippocampus. Rats given LT₄ into hippocampus before training or tests had no effect on the acquisition or retrieval of fear memory, however rats given LT₄ into hippocampus either immediately or 2 h after training showed being significantly impaired fear memory, which demonstrated LT₄ administration into hippocampus impairs the consolidation but has no effect on the acquisition and retrieval of fear memory. Furthermore, hippocampal injection of LT₄ did not affect rats’ locomotor activity, thigmotaxis and THs level in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and serum. These findings may have important implications for understanding mechanisms underlying contribution of THs to memory disorders.