1
|
Alpers SE, Pallesen S, Vold JH, Haug E, Lunde LH, Skogen JC, Mamen A, Mæland S, Fadnes LT. The association between psychological distress and alcohol consumption and physical activity: a population-based cohort study. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1181046. [PMID: 37426109 PMCID: PMC10323831 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1181046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic and infection control measures caused changes to daily life for most people. Heavy alcohol consumption and physical inactivity are two important behavioral risk factors for noncommunicable diseases worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic, with its social distancing measures, home office policies, isolation, and quarantine requirements may have an impact on these factors. This three-wave longitudinal study aims to investigate if psychological distress and worries related to health and economy were associated with levels and changes in alcohol consumption and physical activity during the two first years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. Methods We used data collected in April 2020, January 2021, and January 2022 from an online longitudinal population-based survey. Alcohol consumption and physical activity status were assessed at all three measuring points via the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT-C) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF). COVID-19-related worries, home office/study, occupational situation, age, gender, children below 18 years living at home, and psychological distress (measured with the Symptom Checklist (SCL-10)) were included as independent variables in the model. A mixed model regression was used and presented with coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Analysis of data from 25,708 participants demonstrates that participants with substantial symptoms of psychological distress more often reported higher alcohol consumption (1.86 units/week, CI 1.48-2.24) and lower levels of physical activity [-1,043 Metabolic Equivalents of Task (METs) per week, CI -1,257;-828] at baseline. Working/studying from home (0.37 units/week, CI 0.24-0.50) and being male (1.57 units/week, CI 1.45-1.69) were associated with higher alcohol consumption. Working/studying from home (-536 METs/week, CI -609;-463), and being older than 70 years (-503 METs/week, CI -650;-355) were related to lower levels of physical activity. The differences in activity levels between those with the highest and lowest levels of psychological distress reduced over time (239 METs/week, CI 67;412), and similarly the differences in alcohol intake reduced over time among those having and not having children < 18 years (0.10 units/week, CI 0.01-0.19). Conclusion These findings highlight the substantial increases in risks related to inactivity and alcohol consumption among those with high levels of psychological distress symptoms, and particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and increase the understanding of factors associated with worries and health behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Eiken Alpers
- Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ståle Pallesen
- Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
| | - Jørn Henrik Vold
- Bergen Addiction Research, Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ellen Haug
- Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Teacher Education, NLA University College, Bergen, Norway
| | - Linn-Heidi Lunde
- Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jens Christoffer Skogen
- Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
- Alcohol and Drug Research Western Norway, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asgeir Mamen
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Mæland
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Thore Fadnes
- Bergen Addiction Research, Department of Addiction Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peña S, Mäkelä P, Laatikainen T, Härkänen T, Männistö S, Heliövaara M, Koskinen S. Joint effects of alcohol use, smoking and body mass index as an explanation for the alcohol harm paradox: causal mediation analysis of eight cohort studies. Addiction 2021; 116:2220-2230. [PMID: 33404149 DOI: 10.1111/add.15395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lower socio-economic status (SES) is associated with higher alcohol-related harm despite lower levels of alcohol use. Differential vulnerability due to joint effects of behavioural risk factors is one potential explanation for this 'alcohol harm paradox'. We analysed to what extent socio-economic inequalities in alcohol-mortality are mediated by alcohol, smoking and body mass index (BMI), and their joint effects with each other and with SES. DESIGN Cohort study of eight health examination surveys (1978-2007) linked to mortality data. SETTING Finland. PARTICIPANTS A total of 53 632 Finnish residents aged 25+ years. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was alcohol-attributable mortality. We used income as an indicator of SES. We assessed the joint effects between income and mediators (alcohol use, smoking and BMI) and between the mediators, adjusting for socio-demographic indicators. We used causal mediation analysis to calculate the total, direct, indirect and mediated interactive effects using Aalen's additive hazards models. FINDINGS During 1 085 839 person-years of follow-up, we identified 865 alcohol-attributable deaths. We found joint effects for income and alcohol use and income and smoking, resulting in 46.8 and 11.4 extra deaths due to the interaction per 10 000 person-years. No interactions were observed for income and BMI or between alcohol and other mediators. The lowest compared with the highest income quintile was associated with 5.5 additional alcohol deaths per 10 000 person-years (95% confidence interval = 3.7, 7.3) after adjusting for confounders. The proportion mediated by alcohol use was negative (-69.3%), consistent with the alcohol harm paradox. The proportion mediated by smoking and BMI and their additive interactions with income explained 18.1% of the total effect of income on alcohol-attributable mortality. CONCLUSIONS People of lower socio-economic status appear to be more vulnerable to the effects of alcohol use and smoking on alcohol-attributable mortality. Behavioural risk factors and their joint effects with income may explain part of the alcohol harm paradox.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastián Peña
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Doctoral Programme in Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pia Mäkelä
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Laatikainen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun sote), Joensuu, Finland
| | - Tommi Härkänen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Satu Männistö
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku Heliövaara
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Seppo Koskinen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peña S, Mäkelä P, Härkänen T, Heliövaara M, Gunnar T, Männistö S, Laatikainen T, Vartiainen E, Koskinen S. Measurement error as an explanation for the alcohol harm paradox: analysis of eight cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 49:1836-1846. [PMID: 32995840 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite reporting lower levels of alcohol consumption, people with lower socio-economic status (SES) experience greater alcohol-related harm. Whether differential biases in the measurement of alcohol use could explain this apparent paradox is unknown. Using alcohol biomarkers to account for measurement error, we examined whether differential exposure to alcohol could explain the socio-economic differences in alcohol mortality. METHODS Participants from eight representative health surveys (n = 52 164, mean age 47.7 years) were linked to mortality data and followed up until December 2016. The primary outcome was alcohol-attributable mortality. We used income and education as proxies for SES. Exposures include self-reported alcohol use and four alcohol biomarkers [serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (available in all surveys), carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (available in subsamples)]. We used shared frailty Cox proportional hazards to account for survey heterogeneity. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 20.3 years, totalling 1 056 844 person-years, there were 828 alcohol-attributable deaths. Lower SES was associated with higher alcohol mortality despite reporting lower alcohol use. Alcohol biomarkers were associated with alcohol mortality and improved the predictive ability when used in conjunction with self-reported alcohol use. Alcohol biomarkers explained a very small fraction of the socio-economic differences in alcohol mortality, since hazard ratios either slightly attenuated (percent attenuation range 1.0-12.1%) or increased. CONCLUSIONS Using alcohol biomarkers in addition to self-reported alcohol use did not explain the socio-economic differences in alcohol mortality. Differential bias in the measurement of alcohol use is not a likely explanation for the alcohol-harm paradox.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastián Peña
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland.,Doctoral Programme in Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Facultad de Medicina, University Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pia Mäkelä
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tommi Härkänen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku Heliövaara
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teemu Gunnar
- Department of Government Services, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Satu Männistö
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Laatikainen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland.,Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.,Joint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services (Siun sote), 80211 Joensuu, Finland
| | - Erkki Vartiainen
- International Affairs and Research Support Office, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Seppo Koskinen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chung HG, Sinn DH, Kang W, Choi GS, Kim JM, Joh JW. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Alcohol Relapse After Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease: Comparison Between Deceased Donor and Living Donor Liver Transplantation. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:672-680. [PMID: 32095927 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04540-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are controversies over whether patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) should follow the "6-month abstinence rule" before undergoing liver transplantation (LT), especially in case of living donor LT (LDLT). We analyzed the risk of alcohol relapse among ALD patients who received LT according to donor types and abstinence period before LT. METHODS A total of 129 patients (mean 50.7 ± 9.2 years, male 78.3%) who underwent LT between January 2000 and July 2017 for ALD at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were analyzed. Alcohol relapse was defined as any use of alcohol after LT. RESULTS The alcohol relapse rate was lower in LDLT recipients compared with that in DDLT recipients (13.9% vs. 31.7% at 3 years, P = 0.013). DDLT recipient, short abstinence period (< 6 months), and current smoking status were factors associated with alcohol relapse. The alcohol relapse rate was highest (54.5% at 3 years) for current smokers without 6-month sobriety who received DDLT, and it was lowest for never/ex-smoker with 6-month sobriety who received LDLT (4.3% at 3 years). For LDLT recipients, the alcohol relapse rate was not different according to abstinence period (17.7% vs. 11.6% at 3 years for short abstinent period < 3 months vs. ≥ 3 months, P = 0.92), but it was higher for current smokers compared with that for non/ex-smokers (22.4% vs. 5.8% at 3 years, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION When considering LDLT for ALD, sobriety period may not be an absolute contraindication as abstinence period showed a weak association with alcohol relapse. Smokers need careful attention for alcohol relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Gyo Chung
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| | - Wonseok Kang
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Physical Activity and the Development of Substance Use Disorders: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. PROGRESS IN PREVENTIVE MEDICINE 2018; 3. [PMID: 30345414 PMCID: PMC6192057 DOI: 10.1097/pp9.0000000000000018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Physical activity and exercise are positive health behaviors that have been shown to reduce the risk of physical and psychological diseases. There is a strong rationale that physical activity could be a protective factor against the development of substance use disorders (SUDs), which include some of the most common mental health conditions such as tobacco and alcohol use disorder. This review examined the epidemiological literature to describe the associations of physical activity and substance use across the lifespan. The findings indicated that physical activity is positively associated with current and future alcohol use but negatively associated with tobacco and other drug use, with the strongest support originating from adolescent and young adult samples. Considerably less data exist on physical activity and other drug use in later life. Limitations in previous studies, such as the indeterminate measurement of physical activity and absence of clinical substance use disorder endpoints, should be addressed in future investigations to provide clarity regarding the strength and directions of these relationships among different substances and populations.
Collapse
|