Preclinical Evaluation of the NeVaTM Stent Retriever: Safety and Efficacy in the Swine Thrombectomy Model

Mechanical thrombectomy using the Nimbus stent-retriever - initial experiences in a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

The Nimbus stent-retriever (NSR) was developed for mechanical thrombectomy of wall-adherent thrombi in cerebral arteries. It features a novel geometry with a proximal spiral section and a distal barrel section. The new device is designed to retrieve tough clots with a micro-clamping technique. In the first case series reporting on the NSR, we share our initial experience about the first 12 treated cases.

METHODS

In total, 12 patients (5 men, 7 women; mean age 78 years) with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or the middle cerebral artery (M1 or M2 segment) were treated with the NSR, 11 after unsuccessful recanalization attempts with conventional stent-retrievers or aspiration thrombectomy.

RESULTS

Retrieving maneuvers with the NSR recovered a thrombus in 7 patients (58%), of which 6 resulted in vessel recanalization mTICI ≥ 2b. Successful recanalization improved the mTICI score by a median of 3 points. In 5 of 7 cases, this required only one thrombectomy maneuver. In 5 cases, no improvement of recanalization could be achieved with the NSR (1-3 attempts). No NSR-related complications occurred in this case series.

CONCLUSIONS

In our initial experience, the NSR appeared to be a safe and effective second-line stent-retriever after unsuccessful MT with conventional stent-retrievers or aspiration thrombectomy allowing for mTICI ≥ 2b rescue thrombectomy in ab 50% of cases. No NSR associated complications occurred in our case series.

Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVaTM stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the NeVaTM stent retriever as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, all consecutive patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy with NeVaTM stent retriever as first- or second-line device due to intracranial vessel occlusion with acute ischemic stroke between March and November 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (m=18, f=21) with a mean age of 69.9 ± 13.3 years were treated with the NeVaTM stent retriever. NeVaTM stent retriever was used as first-line device in 24 (61.5%) of patients and in 15 (38.5%) as second-line device. First-pass rate (≥mTICI 2c) of NeVaTM stent retriever was both 66.7% when used as first- or second-line device. Final recanalization rate including rescue strategies was 92.3% for ≥mTICI2c and 94.9% for ≥mTICI2b. No device-related minor or major adverse events were observed. A hemorrhage was detected in 33.3% of patients at 24h post-thrombectomy dual-energy CT, of which none was classified as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. NIHSS and mRS improved significantly at discharge compared to admission (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The NeVaTM stent retriever has a high effectivity and good safety profile as first- and second-line device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

In vitro models for the experimental evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy devices in acute ischemic stroke

Mechanical thrombectomy has become an important method for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions. The current hotspots of mechanical thrombectomy are optimizing the treatment methods, improving the recanalization rate and reducing complications. The in vitro model has become a common and convenient method for mechanical thrombectomy research. This review summarizes the in vitro model in the following aspects: the preparation of clot analogues; the experimental platform; the application of the in vitro model in the testing of thrombectomy devices; and the advantages, limitations and future trends of the in vitro experimental model. This review describes the characteristics and applications of the in vitro experimental model with the hope that the in vitro experimental model will be further improved and play a more effective role in the study of mechanical thrombectomy.

First pass results of mechanical thrombectomy with two-drop zone NeVaTM device

BACKGROUND

Occlusive thrombi in acute ischemic stroke can be in various types which limits the success of the thrombectomy. The NeVaTM (Vesalio, Nashville, Tennessee) thrombectomy device was originally designed for all types of clot. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the NeVaTM device for mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected mechanical thrombectomy database revealed 145 patients who had fullfilled the inclusion criteria. The data collected includes clinical patient characteristics, procedural measures, timestamp at each stage, and patient outcome. IV thrombolytics application, pre and post-intervention imaging findings, device related adverse event and any type of intracranial hemorrhage were recorded.

RESULTS

There was female pre-dominance (54.5%). Median presenting national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) was 16 (IQR, 3-32). 88 MCA-m1 (60,6%), 43 ICA-tip (29,6%), 11 MCA-m2 (7,5%), 2 ACA (1,4%) and 1 basilar (0,7%) occlusions were underwent for mechanical thrombectomy. Median procedure time was 25 min (IQR, 7-136). First-pass reperfusion scores were mTICI 0-2a 22.7%, mTICI 2b 23.4%, mTICI 2c 17.9% and mTICI 3 35.9%. Mean number of pass was 1,84 ± 1,14. Final mTICI 2b-3 score was 97.9% and TICI2c-3 score was 87.6%. No device related adverse event occurred. The mean 24-h NIHSS score was 6 (IQR 0-33).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the NeVa thrombectomy device offers a high rate of first-pass success along with favorable safety profile. Larger series and multi-center studies are needed for further investigation.

Ovine Iliac Vein Model for Endovascular Thrombectomy of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

An ovine iliac vein thrombosis model was devised to test a wall-contacting rotational thrombectomy device. Thrombosis was successfully induced in 9 sheep with an average clot length of 31 mm ± 12 and >60% vessel occlusion on angiography. The thrombus was subsequently removed, maintaining normal intraoperative pulmonary arterial pressure (5.9 mm Hg ± 3.6) and complete distal reperfusion after thrombectomy. Additionally, the sheep were without signs of vascular trauma or embolic complications on gross necropsy and histopathologic analysis. The findings from this study support the use of an ovine iliac deep vein thrombosis model for testing of a lower extremity thrombectomy device.

Preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy

Mechanical thrombectomy to treat large vessel occlusions (LVO) causing a stroke is one of the most effective treatments in medicine, with a number needed to treat to improve clinical outcomes as low as 2.6. As the name implies, it is a mechanical solution to a blocked artery and modeling these mechanics preclinically for device design, regulatory clearance and high-fidelity physician training made clinical applications possible. In vitro simulation of LVO is extensively used to characterize device performance in representative vascular anatomies with physiologically accurate hemodynamics. Embolus analogues, validated against clots extracted from patients, provide a realistic simulated use experience. In vitro experimentation produces quantitative results such as particle analysis of distal emboli generated during the procedure, as well as pressure and flow throughout the experiment. Animal modeling, used mostly for regulatory review, allows estimation of device safety. Other than one recent development, nearly all animal modeling does not incorporate the desired target organ, the brain, but rather is performed in the extracranial circulation. Computational modeling of the procedure remains at the earliest stages but represents an enormous opportunity to rapidly characterize and iterate new thrombectomy concepts as well as optimize procedure workflow. No preclinical model is a perfect surrogate; however, models available can answer important questions during device development and have to date been successful in delivering efficacious and safe devices producing excellent clinical outcomes. This review reflects on the developments of preclinical modeling of mechanical thrombectomy with particular focus on clinical translation, as well as articulate existing gaps requiring additional research.

Preclinical testing platforms for mechanical thrombectomy in stroke: a review on phantoms, in-vivo animal, and cadaveric models

Preclinical testing platforms have been instrumental in the research and development of thrombectomy devices. However, there is no single model which fully captures the complexity of cerebrovascular anatomy, physiology, and the dynamic artery-clot-device interaction. This article provides a critical review of phantoms, in-vivo animal, and human cadaveric models used for thrombectomy testing and provides insights into the strengths and limitations of each platform. Articles published in the past 10 years that reported thrombectomy testing platforms were identified. Characteristics of each test platform, such as intracranial anatomy, artery tortuosity, vessel friction, flow conditions, device-vessel interaction, and visualization, were captured and benchmarked against human cerebral vessels involved in large-vessel occlusion stroke. Thrombectomy phantoms have been constructed from silicone, direct 3D-printed polymers, and glass. These phantoms represent oversimplified patient-specific cerebrovascular geometry but enable adequate visualization of devices and clots under appropriate flow conditions. They do not realistically mimic the artery-clot interaction. For the animal models, arteries from swine, canines, and rabbits have been reported. These models can reasonably replicate the artery-clot-device interaction and have the unique value of evaluating the safety of thrombectomy devices. However, the vasculature geometries are substantially less complex and flow conditions are different from human cerebral arteries. Cadaveric models are the most accurate vascular representations but with limited access and challenges in reproducibility of testing conditions. Multiple test platforms should be likely used for comprehensive evaluation of thrombectomy devices. Interpretation of the testing results should take into consideration platform-specific limitations.

Favorable first-pass recanalization rates with NeVa™ thrombectomy device in acute stroke patients: Initial clinical experience

BACKGROUND

The NeVa™ thrombectomy device (Vesalio LLC, Nashville, USA) has been reported to succeed in large vessel occlusion thrombectomy in animal, in-vitro, and clinical studies. Designed with Drop Zone technology, a closed distal tip, and strong expansive radial force, the device demonstrated particular efficiency in resistant "white" thrombi in preclinical research. Our goal is to determine the safety and performance of this novel stent retriever on first-pass rates and overall recanalization.

METHODS

The Interventional Neurology Database is a prospectively maintained database of anterior and posterior circulation stroke thrombectomy cases. We retrospectively analyzed cases where the NeVa™ thrombectomy device was used as the first-line treatment strategy. Data collection occurred between January 2019 and January 2020. First-pass recanalization, final recanalization, 90-day functional outcome, complication, and bleeding rates are reported.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients were treated with the NeVa™ thrombectomy device. The mean patient age was 69 ± 14 years, the median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 14, and the median initial Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography score was 8. The median time from groin puncture to successful recanalization was 29 min (interquartile range (IQR): 20-40). First-pass recanalization rates were 56.8% (modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b/3) and 44.9% (mTICI 2c/3). Final successful recanalization rate was 95.8% (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b/3). Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was 53% in the "first-pass" subgroup and 42.4% in the total patient population. The median number of passes to achieve the final recanalization score was 1 (IQR 1-2). The rate of embolization into new territory was 1.7%. Four patients (3.3%) had symptomatic hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the NeVa™ device demonstrated high first-pass and overall recanalization rates along with a good safety profile.

Mechanical Thrombectomy with the Novel NeVa M1 Stent Retriever: Do the Drop Zones Represent a Risk or a Benefit?

OBJECTIVE

The NeVa M1 thrombectomy device is a novel hybrid-cell stent retriever with multifunctional zones for optimized retrieval of resistant clots located in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NeVa in a "real-life" setting.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients (median age: 77 years) treated with the NeVa M1 for acute ischemic stroke of the M1 segement were retrospectively reviewed. First-pass and final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scores, device-related complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores are reported. Primary outcome parameters were first-pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion and mRS 0-2 at 90 days.

RESULTS

Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores decreased from 16 to 12 after treatment. mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion rates were 55% after the first pass, 79% after 1-2 passes, and 100% after the final pass. mTICI 2c-3 was obtained in 48% after the first pass, 62% after 1-2 passes, and 72% after the final pass. Rescue treatment was performed in 4 patients (14%). Device-related complications included 1 asymptomatic caroticocavernous fistula, 1 asymptomatic M2 dissection, and 1 symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The procedure-related vasospasm rate was 48%. A 90-day mRS of 0-2 was achieved by 31%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NeVa M1 provides a high first-pass complete reperfusion rate with an adequate safety profile. To retrieve resistant clots, the stent design exerts high mechanical traction forces, which may trigger vasospasm and vessel wall damage. Large, comparative studies are warranted to draw a definite conclusion on this device.

A Method to Evaluate Vessel Deviation during Withdrawal of a Stent Retriever Using a Silicon Vascular Model

Objective

Catastrophic complications may develop because of vessel deviation during device delivery into intracranial vessels for neurointerventions. We report a novel method using a silicon model capable of evaluating vessel deviation as a numerical value.

Methods

In all, 10 tiny markers, each with a pitch of approximately 5 mm, were attached to the vessel model along the long axis. We used a high-resolution camera to record movies of the deviation of the vessel model while employing different stent retrievers. The movies were reviewed to determine the maximum deviation of each marker on the vessel model.

Results

As expected, stent retrievers of the same type exhibited more vessel shifts when they had a larger diameter and longer length. On the other hand, stents with a segmental structure demonstrated less vessel deviation than those with a tubular structure, regardless of the large lumen and long length.

Conclusion

If the degree of vessel stress can be represented by a numerical value, areas where the careful use of different devices for neurointerventions is required may be able to be identified. Moreover, this method may be useful for training.

Mechanical thrombectomy with a novel stent retriever with multifunctional zones: Initial clinical experience with the NeVa™ thrombectomy device

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The NeVa™ (Vesalio, Nashville, Tennessee) thrombectomy device is a CE-approved novel hybrid-cell stent retriever with offset enlarged openings coupled with functional zones and a closed distal end. The device was designed to incorporate and trap resistant emboli. The purpose was to determine the safety and efficacy of the NeVa™ stent.

METHODS

Prospective data was collected on the first thirty consecutive patients treated at four stroke centers with NeVa™ as first line treatment between December 2017 and May 2018. Clinical outcome measures included re-perfusion scores after each pass, complications (per-procedural complications, device related adverse events, all intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH) on follow up imaging), 24 hour NIHSS, mRS at discharge and 90 days. Baseline data as well as treatment parameters were documented.

RESULTS

Mean presenting NIHSS was 16. Sites of primary occlusion were 10 ICA, 16 M1-MCA, 3 M2-MCA and one basilar. There were five tandem occlusions. Reperfusion outcomes after each NeVa pass; TICI ≥ 2b after first pass 63%, after 1 or 2 passes 83%, after 1 to 3 passes 90%. TICI 2c-3 after first pass 47%, after 1-2 passes 57%, after 1-3 passes 60%. TICI ≥ 2b after final pass 93%; TICI 2c-3, 63%. There were no device related serious averse events and no sICH. Clot material was partially or completely incorporated into the device after 70% passes. The mean 24 hour NIHSS was 7 and the 90 day mRS was 0-2 in 53%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NeVa™ device demonstrated a high rate of first pass complete reperfusion effect, a good safety profile and favorable 90 day clinical outcomes in this initial clinical experience.

Pathological Safety Assessment in Preclinical Neurothrombectomy Studies

The design, production, and preclinical testing of neurothrombectomy devices is in a burgeoning phase as the demand escalates for safe and reliable treatment options following neurovascular stroke. Currently, there is a paucity of published data describing the development of iatrogenic vascular lesions occurring secondary to neurothrombectomy procedures. In an effort to test new devices, demonstrate device safety, satisfy regulatory requirements, and develop an understanding of the potential for associated vascular pathology, investigators are establishing appropriate methodology in suitable animal models. Significant challenges exist in identifying a single animal species that can be consistently utilized in all phases of device development. These aforementioned challenges are underscored by the intricacies of neurovascular pathology, thrombovascular interactions, and vascular responses to injury.