Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Triggers Onset of Bullous Pemphigoid in a Patient with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Nivolumab

Prevalence, Spectrum and Clinical Implications of Malignancies in Patients with Bullous Pemphigoid

Current research on the malignancy rate and spectrum of malignancies in patients with bullous pemphigoid is contradictory. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and spectrum of malignancy in patients with bullous pemphigoid and to compare demographic, clinical, therapeutic and outcome data between bullous pemphigoid patients with and without malignancy. This retrospective cohort study enrolled 335 patients (194 women and 141 men; mean age at diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid 77.5 ± 12 years) followed up at an Israeli tertiary centre between January 2009 and December 2019: 107 (32%) had malignancy and 228 (68%) did not. Malignancy occurred before and after bullous pemphigoid diagnosis in 82 (77%) and 25 (23%) patients, respectively. Bullous pemphigoid patients with cancer were older (p = 0.02) and had a higher mortality rate (p < 0.0001) than those without malignancy. The 2 groups did not differ in terms of sex, comorbidities, or clinical characteristics. Those who developed malignancy before bullous pemphigoid were younger than those who developed malignancy after bullous pemphigoid (mean age 69.3 vs 82.4 years, p < 0.0001). Overall malignancy rates did not differ between patients with bullous pemphigoid and the general population; therefore, comprehensive malignancy workup may be unnecessary. However, patients with bullous pemphigoid had a greater risk of melanoma (10.7% vs 4.3%, p = 0.0005); therefore, routine skin screening may be recommended.

Clinical evidence for synergy between immunotherapy and radiotherapy (SITAR)

Previous preclinical and clinical trials have shown promising antitumour activity and toxicity profile when employing the 'Synergy between Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy' (SITAR) strategy. Approximately, one in seven radiation therapy studies currently recruiting is investigating SITAR. This article reviews the range of cancers known to respond to immunotherapy and publications analysing SITAR. It sets the background for work that needs to be done in future clinical trials. It also reviews the potential toxicities of immunotherapy and discusses areas where caution is required when combining treatments.

Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review

Importance

There is limited information on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) in patients with cancer, with most existing studies being case reports or small case series from a single institution. Prior review attempts have not approached the literature in a systematic manner and have focused only on ICI-BP secondary to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The current knowledge base of all aspects of ICI-BP is limited.

Objective

To characterize the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatments, and outcomes of ICI-BP in patients with cancer as reported in the current literature.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles reporting data on individual patients who met preestablished inclusion criteria were selected, and a predefined set of data was abstracted. When possible, study results were quantitatively combined.

Findings

In total, 70 studies reporting data on 127 individual patients undergoing ICI therapy for cancer (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-77] years; 27 women [21.3%]) were included. In pooled analyses, patients ranged in age from 35 to 90 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid often occurred during the course of anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 therapy but was also found to develop up to several months after treatment cessation. Prodromal symptoms, such as pruritus or nonspecific skin eruptions, were found in approximately half of the patient population. Histopathologic or serologic testing, when undertaken, was a helpful adjunct in establishing diagnosis. Treatment with immunotherapy was discontinued after ICI-BP development in most patients. The most common treatments were systemic and topical corticosteroids. Steroid-sparing therapies, such as antibiotics and other systemic immunomodulators, were also used as adjuvant treatment modalities. Biologic and targeted agents, used predominantly in cases refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, were associated with marked symptomatic improvement in most patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this systematic review suggest that ICI-BP often poses a therapeutic challenge for patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy. Further research on the early recognition, diagnosis, and use of targeted treatment modalities will be essential in developing more personalized treatment options for affected patients while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

Bullous pemphigoid and radiotherapy: case report and literature review update

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common autoimmune bullous disease generally occurring in elderly patients. Itchy and tense blisters on normal skin or erythematous and edematous lesions on the trunk and extremities usually characterize BP. Trigger factors are still unclear while several case reports suggest a potential role of radiotherapy (RT) as BP trigger for disease onset or recrudescence. A review was performed to provide an update of literature. A case report of a patient affected by BP undergoing two radiotherapy courses for a primary breast cancer was also reported. A comprehensive review of the published literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review included studies describing BP and its relationships with RT treatments. A total of 13 articles were reviewed. Studies characteristics analysis resulted in eleven case reports, one case series and one large-scale case– control study. Literature update confirms the existence of a reasonable connection between RT and BP. Case report showed that a multidisciplinary management seems to assure the feasibility of RT in patients affected by BP, not depriving them of standard therapeutic opportunities.

Development of bullous pemphigoid following radiation therapy combined with nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma: A case report of abscopal toxicities

RATIONALE

Concern for immune-related adverse events from immunotherapy and radiation therapy are well-documented; however, side effects are mostly mild to moderate. However, high-grade, potentially life-threatening adverse events are increasing. While case reports regarding immunotherapy-related bullous pemphigoid (BP) have been rising, only 1 has described BP following concomitant use of both nivolumab and radiation therapy (RT). For that patient, nivolumab was used for 10 weeks prior to RT and development of PB followed 7 weeks later. This case presents a patient who tolerated nivolumab well for 38 months prior to developing BP less than 2 weeks after completing RT.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present the case of DH, a 67-year-old gentleman on nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the lung since May of 2017. Following progressing lung nodules, the patient had his nivolumab paused and completed a course of short-beam radiation therapy. After restarting nivolumab post-radiation, the patient presented with itchy rash and blisters on his arm, legs, and trunk.

DIAGNOSIS

DH consulted dermatology following development of rash and was diagnosed with bullous dermatosis, likely bullous pemphigoid. Bullous pemphigoid following concomitant nivolumab (OPDIVO), despite prior tolerance and no history of autoimmune disease, was confirmed by biopsy a month later.

INTERVENTIONS

Initial treatment was betamethasone 0.05% cream mixed 1:1 with powder to form paste applied twice daily. Given progressive symptoms and confirmatory biopsy of BP, nivolumab was held and 100 mg doxycycline and 80 mg prednisone daily was prescribed for a week, reduced to 60 mg during the second week.

OUTCOMES

A week following discontinuation of nivolumab and beginning of doxycycline and prednisone, the blistering and rash was almost entirely resolved. Four months later, nivolumab was restarted and the patient continued low-dose tapering of prednisone until December. Since completing prednisone, the patient has shown no recurrence of bullous pemphigoid and has not developed any other immune-related adverse events to nivolumab upon rechallenge. Follow-up through October 2021 demonstrates the patient's sites of disease, both in- and out-field, have remained responsive to treatment.

LESSONS

Treating physicians should be aware of off-target effects of radiotherapy for oligoprogressive disease, which may include abscopal toxicities and the development of new immune-related adverse effects.

Cutaneous adverse events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors

IMPORTANCE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as active therapies for a variety of cancers. Cutaneous toxicities are common immune-related adverse events and patients will often be referred to dermatologists for evaluation.

OBSERVATIONS

Cutaneous adverse events to ICIs can have a variety of clinical presentations. Among the more common are eczematous, morbilliform, and lichenoid dermatoses, as well as vitiligo and pruritus. Less common adverse events include psoriasiform dermatoses, bullous disorders, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Because of the immunologic mechanism of ICIs, there are also a variety of rheumatologic adverse reactions with cutaneous manifestations, such as scleroderma, dermatomyositis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and various vasculitides. These cutaneous reactions often respond to topical or systemic steroids, although specific toxicities may have alternative treatments available.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

As they become more widely prescribed, dermatologists will see an increasing number of patients with cutaneous adverse events caused by ICI therapies. Accurately diagnosing and treating these toxicities is paramount to achieving the most favorable outcomes for patients.

Bullous Pemphigoid: Trigger and Predisposing Factors

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most frequent autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease provoked by autoantibodies directed against two hemidesmosomal proteins: BP180 and BP230. Its pathogenesis depends on the interaction between predisposing factors, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, comorbidities, aging, and trigger factors. Several trigger factors, such as drugs, thermal or electrical burns, surgical procedures, trauma, ultraviolet irradiation, radiotherapy, chemical preparations, transplants, and infections may induce or exacerbate BP disease. Identification of predisposing and trigger factors can increase the understanding of BP pathogenesis. Furthermore, an accurate anamnesis focused on the recognition of a possible trigger factor can improve prognosis by promptly removing it.

Management of Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: Focus on Asian Populations

The interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) induces exhaustions of cytotoxic lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment, which facilitates tumor immune evasion. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, which prevents the receptors and ligands from binding to each other, disrupts the T-cell exhaustion signaling, thereby increasing antitumor immunity. Inspiringly, it has revolutionized the treatment of many different types of cancers including non-small-cell lung carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, and so on. However, with the intention of generating an antitumor immune response, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may also lead to a spectrum of side effects. The profile of adverse events (AEs) of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is not exactly the same with other immune checkpoint blockades, such as blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. Although cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary systems are common victims, AEs of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade might occur in any other organ system of the human body. These toxicities can be life-threatening if not managed promptly, and proper treatment intervention is imperative for optimal control and prevention of severe damage. Currently, clinical practice for the management of AEs in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade remains sporadic and variable. The majority of initial clinical trials were carried out in Caucasians. The trials of multiple races usually included a small portion of Asian participants, and results were calculated and interpreted for the entire included subjects without any race-specific conclusions. Therefore, the information on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in Asians is far from systematic or comprehensive. Recently, as the results of clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in Asian populations have been gradually released, we summarized current evidence with a specific focus on the Asian population, hoping to outline strategies and offer guidance on the management of AEs in cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in the Asian world.