Antenatal Corticosteroid Exposure Disrupts Myelination in the Auditory Nerve of Preterm Sheep

Addressing the long-term risks of administering antenatal steroids

INTRODUCTION

A single course of antenatal steroid (ANS) therapy is standard of care for women at risk of preterm birth, reducing the risk of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal morbidity and mortality. An unresolved challenge relates to the potential risk for adverse long-term effects, and how these risks might be balanced with therapeutic benefit.

AREAS COVERED

We outline key concepts in glucocorticoid signaling, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and clinical use before presenting data on the potential long-term harms of ANS therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Our assessment is i) Currently used, high dose ANS regimens can induce multi-system changes in the fetus that alter growth and development, potentially increasing long-term disease risk; ii) relative risks likely increase proportionally to the magnitude and duration of steroid exposure, in late preterm and term ANS use, and in off-target treatments. A single course of ANS therapy to at risk women between 24- and 34-weeks' gestation is well justified. Efforts should be made to improve dosing and patient selection. At periviable gestations the high immediate risk of serious disease or death justifies modest long-term risks. At late preterm and term gestations, where steroids do not provide significant survival or health benefits, supporting routine ANS use is more difficult.

Antenatal corticosteroids and neurodevelopmental outcomes in late preterm births

OBJECTIVES

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) decrease neonatal mortality and morbidity among preterm neonates, yet there has been concern regarding their long-term safety. We hypothesised that potential long-term adverse effects of ACS may be observed among infants born during the late preterm period (LPT, 34^0/7-36^6/7 weeks of gestation), when the benefits of ACS are subtle.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada, between 2006 and 2011.

PATIENTS

All live singleton infants born during the LPT period with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

INTERVENTIONS

Exposure to ACS prior to 34^0/7 weeks of gestation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Suspected neurocognitive disorder, audiometry testing or visual testing.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 668 infants were eligible for analysis, of whom 2689 (10.5%) received ACS. Infants in the ACS group had lower mean birth weight and higher rates of birth weight <10th percentile, neonatal resuscitation and neonatal intensive care unit admission. At 5 years of age, ACS exposure was associated with an increased risk of suspected neurocognitive disorder (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.20), audiometry testing (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.31) and visual testing (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11).

CONCLUSION

In children born during the LPT period, exposure to ACS prior to 34^0/7 weeks of gestation is associated with an increased utilisation of the healthcare system related to audiometry and visual testing and suspected neurocognitive disorders by 5 years of age.

Neurodevelopmental disorders among term infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids during pregnancy: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

An increasing proportion of fetuses are exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (ACS). Despite their immediate beneficial effects, the long-term safety of ACS has been an ongoing source of concern. In the current study, we assessed the likelihood of neurodevelopmental problems among term infants exposed to ACS earlier in pregnancy compared with non-exposed term infants.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study (2006-2011). Median duration of follow-up was 7.8 (IQR 6.4-9.2) years.

SETTING

Population-based study, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

All live singleton infants born at term (≥37^0/7 weeks gestation) (n=529 205).

EXPOSURE

ACS during pregnancy.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

A composite of diagnostic or billing codes reflecting proven or suspected neurodevelopmental problems during childhood including audiometry testing, visual testing or physician service claim with a diagnosis code related to a suspected neurocognitive disorder.

RESULTS

At 5 years of age, the cumulative rate for the primary outcome was higher among infants exposed to ACS compared with non-exposed infants: 61.7% (3346/5423) vs 57.8% (302 520/523 782), respectively (p<0.001; number needed to harm (NNH)=25, 95% CI 19 to 38; adjusted HR (aHR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.16). Similar findings were observed for each of the individual components of the primary outcome: 15.3% vs 12.7% for audiometry testing (p<0.001; NNH=39, 95% CI 29 to 63; aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.25); 45.4% vs 43.5% for visual testing (p=0.006; NNH=54, 95% CI 31 to 200; aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12) and 25.8% vs 21.6% for suspected neurocognitive disorder (p<0.001; NNH=24, 95% CI 19 to 33; aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association among term infants between exposure to ACS during pregnancy and healthcare utilisation during childhood related to suspected neurocognitive and neurosensory disorders.

Prenatal programming of stress responsiveness and behaviours: Progress and perspectives

Parental exposure to stress or glucocorticoids either before or during pregnancy can have profound influences on neurodevelopment, neuroendocrine function and behaviours in offspring. Specific outcomes are dependent on the nature, intensity and timing of the exposure, as well as species, sex and age of the subject. Most recently, it has become evident that outcomes are not confined to first-generation offspring and that there may be intergenerational and transgenerational transmission of effects. There has been intense focus on the mechanisms by which such early exposure leads to long-term and potential transgenerational outcomes, and there is strong emerging evidence that epigenetic processes (histone modifications, DNA methylation, and small non-coding RNAs) are involved. New knowledge in this area may allow the development of interventions that can prevent, ameliorate or reverse the long-term negative outcomes associated with exposure to early adversity. This review will focus on the latest research, bridging human and pre-clinical studies, and will highlight some of the limitations, challenges and gaps that exist in the field.