1
|
Horala A, Szubert S, Nowak-Markwitz E. Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1848. [PMID: 38791927 PMCID: PMC11120042 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Horala
- Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Gynaecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland; (S.S.); (E.N.-M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evaluation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the adjuvant management of uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307:891-901. [PMID: 35708782 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06589-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) on the survival of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) patients. METHODS We analyzed 3207 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma without distant metastasis after surgery from 2004 to 2015 by utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Generally, cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Further subgroup survival analysis was performed for those receiving RT and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). RESULTS In general, both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that age, race, marital status, stage, lymph node metastasis, lymphadenectomy (LND), RT, and chemotherapy (CT) were associated with improved CSS and OS (P < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis showed that CRT exhibited a survival advantage over RT or CT alone in different groups. Various RT modalities, including brachytherapy (BT), external radiotherapy (EBRT), and EBRT + BT, were correlated with improved survival for patients aged 60-69 years with stage III-IV disease and lymph node metastasis. Patients with stage I-II disease aged > 70 years seemed to gain survival benefits from brachytherapy (BT) alone. BT with or without external radiotherapy was associated with improved survival for those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION For UCS without distant metastasis after surgery, CRT should be considered. Regarding RT, BT alone is efficient in improving survival, especially for patients with stage I-II disease aged > 70 years old. EBRT alone does not show results in survival improvement for patients who did not undergo LND and those with lymph node metastasis. However, considering the limitation of SEER database, further studies with more large sample size and strict study design are needed to confirm it.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Caruso G, Enomoto T, Takehara K, Denys H, Lorusso D, Coleman R, Vaughan MM, Takano M, Provencher DM, Sagae S, Wimberger P, Póka R, Segev Y, Kim SI, Kim JW, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Ramirez PT, Mariani A, Leitao M, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Vergote I, Zannoni G, Tan D, McCormack M, Paolini B, Bini M, Raspagliesi F, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Colombo N, Pignata S, Scambia G, Monk BJ. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:147-174. [PMID: 36585027 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave RoussT, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Belgium
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle M Vaughan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Medical, Japan
| | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Sapienza of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal, Infantile, and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynecologic Oncology Unit; University of Milan Bicocca; Milan; Italy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Terblanche L, Botha MH. Uterine carcinosarcoma: A 10-year single institution experience. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271526. [PMID: 35862371 PMCID: PMC9302809 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to determine 5-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, to determine clinical and surgical-pathologic features, to recognize patterns of recurrence and to identify prognostic factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Design
This was a single institution, retrospective 10-year review of patients treated at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa with pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma.
Methods
A total of 61 patients were studied. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcome information were obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effects of variables on PFS and OS.
Results
Eighteen patients (29%) presented as FIGO stage I disease, 5 patients (8%) as stage II, 16 patients (26%) as stage III and 22 patients (36%) as stage IV disease. Fifty of the 61 patients (82%) had surgery. Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 17.3% (CI 8.9%-27.9%) and 19.7% (CI 10.6%-30.8%), respectively. Seventeen patients presented with recurrence of which 5 (29.4%) were local and 12 (70.6%) were outside the pelvis.
In the univariate analysis, tumour diameter ≥ 100mm (HR 4.57; 95% CI 1.59–13.19; p-value 0.005) was associated with 5-year PFS and in univariate analysis of OS, a positive family history (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–0.99; p-value 0.047), receiving a full staging operation (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18–0.78; p-value 0.008) and receiving any other modality of treatment, with or without surgery, (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27–0.85; p-value 0.012) were associated with better survival. An abnormal cervical smear (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.03–5.6; p-value 0.041), late-stage disease (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.79–6.77; p-value < 0.001), presence of residual tumour (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.90–7.02; p-value < 0.001), myometrial invasion more than 50% (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.15–4.57; p-value 0.019), cervical involvement (HR 3.38; 95% CI 1.64–6.97; p-value 0.001) and adnexal involvement (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.56–6.63; p-value 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of death.
In the multivariate analysis, full staging operation was associated with a risk of progression of disease (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.17–10.41; p-value 0.025). Advanced stage (HR 4.2; 95% CI 2.09–8.44; p-value < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of death. Any other modality of treatment (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15–0.53; p-value < 0.001) and full staging laparotomy (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12–0.59; p-value 0.001) was a protective factor for death.
Conclusions
Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive cancer with poorer survival in this specific cohort than has been described in other contemporary cohorts. Biological or genetic factors are a possible explanation for lower overall survival in this population. Although it is also possible that later diagnosis and poor access to health care contribute to poorer survival. Most recurrences occur outside of the pelvis. Full staging surgery (including pelvic lymphadenectomy) and additional use of other modalities (either for radical or palliative intent) improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leana Terblanche
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Unit for Gynaecological Oncology, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- * E-mail:
| | - Matthys H. Botha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Unit for Gynaecological Oncology, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Su MH, Wu HH, Huang HY, Lee NR, Chang WH, Lin SC, Chen YJ, Wang PH. Comparing paclitaxel-platinum with ifosfamide-platinum as the front-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage uterine carcinosarcoma. J Chin Med Assoc 2022; 85:204-211. [PMID: 34698689 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a rare but highly lethal disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy is highly recommended for advanced UCS. To date, the standard chemotherapy regimen is still uncertain, although two regimens as paclitaxel-platinum (PP) and ifosfamide-platinum (IP) regimens are most commonly used. The aims of the current study attempt to compare both regimens in the management of advanced UCS patients. METHODS We evaluated advanced UCS patients who were treated either with PP or with IP after primary cytoreductive surgery in single institute retrospectively. The clinical-pathological parameters, recurrence, and survival were recorded. RESULTS A total of 16 patients were analyzed. Twelve patients received adjuvant PP therapy, and the remaining four patients received IP therapy. The median follow-up time was 28 months, ranging from 3.8 months to 121 months. Disease-related death occurred in 10 patients (62.5%). The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months, ranging from 3.8 months to 36.5 months in IP, and 23.1 months, ranging from 9.3 months to 121 months in PP, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). The median overall survival was 9.5 months (ranging from 3.8 months to 36.5 months) and 28.7 months (ranging from 10.3 months to 121 months) in IP and PP, respectively, without statistically significant difference (p = 0.06). Presence of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenopathy and deep myometrial invasion (>1/2) were associated with worse prognosis by univariate analysis. No prognostic factor could be identified using multivariate analysis model. CONCLUSION In the current study, due to extremely little number of subjects enrolled, the advantage of using paclitaxel-platinum regimen in the management of advanced UCS was still unclear, although a certain trend of favoring was supposed. We are looking forward to seeing more studies to identify the approximate regimen in the management of this highly lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Hsuan Su
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hua-Hsi Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hsin-Yi Huang
- Biostatics Task Force, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Na-Rong Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wen-Hsun Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shih-Chieh Lin
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Peng-Hui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Female Cancer Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Romeo C, Le Saux O, Jacobs M, Joly F, Ferron G, Favier L, Fumet JD, Isambert N, Colombo PE, Sabatier R, Bastide L, Charreton A, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Gertych W, Dubot C, Bello Roufai D, Bataillon G, Berton D, Kalbacher E, Pautier P, Pomel C, Cornou C, Treilleux I, Lardy-Cleaud A, Ray-Coquard I. Therapeutic Challenges in Patients with Gynecologic Carcinosarcomas: Analysis of a Multicenter National Cohort Study from the French Prospective TMRG Network. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:354. [PMID: 35053517 PMCID: PMC8773830 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gynecological carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases, with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicentric cohort study within the French national prospective Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network was conducted. Data from all included carcinosarcomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS 425 cases of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (n = 313 and n = 112, respectively) were collected and analyzed from 12 participating centers. At diagnosis, 140 patients (48%) had a FIGO stage III-IV uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and 88 patients (83%) had an advanced ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) (FIGO stage ≥ III). Two hundred sixty-seven patients (63%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, most preferably carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen (n = 227, 86%). After a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 15.1 months (95% CI 12.3-20.6) and 14.8 months (95% CI 13.1-17.1) for OCS and UCS, respectively. The median overall survival for OCS and UCS was 37.1 months (95% CI 22.2-49.2) and 30.6 months (95% CI 24.1-40.9), respectively. With adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, mPFS was 41.0 months (95% CI 17.0-NR) and 18.9 months (95% CI 14.0-45.6) for UCS stages I-II and stages III-IV, respectively. In the early stage UCS subgroup (i.e., stage IA, n = 86, 30%), mPFS for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24) was not reached (95% CI 22.2-NR), while mPFS for untreated patients (n = 62) was 19.9 months (95% IC 13.9-72.9) (HR 0.44 (0.20-0.95) p = 0.03). At the first relapse, median PFS for all patients was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.5-5.3). In the first relapse, mPFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-8.5) and 2.2 months (95% CI 1.9-2.9) with a combination of chemotherapy or monotherapy, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Interestingly, this vast prospective cohort of gynecological carcinosarcoma patients from the French national Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors network (i) highlights the positive impact of adjuvant CT on survival in all localized stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas), (ii) confirms the importance of platinum-based combination as an option for relapse setting, and (iii) reports median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Romeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Olivia Le Saux
- Cancer Research Center of Lyon CRCL, UMR Inserm 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Margaux Jacobs
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
| | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.J.); (F.J.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
| | - Gwenael Ferron
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Favier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Nicolas Isambert
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Ludovic Bastide
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France;
| | - Amandine Charreton
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
| | - Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France
| | - Witold Gertych
- Gynaecologic Surgery Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France;
| | - Coraline Dubot
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Diana Bello Roufai
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, 92210 Paris, France;
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - Elsa Kalbacher
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, CHRU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - Patricia Pautier
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Pomel
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Caroline Cornou
- Surgical Oncology Department, Centre Jean Perrin, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Isabelle Treilleux
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- Tumor Biology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France; (A.C.); (I.R.-C.)
- GINECO Group, 75008 Paris, France; (G.F.); (L.F.); (N.I.); (P.-E.C.); (R.S.); (M.D.-S.); (C.D.); (G.B.); (D.B.); (E.K.); (P.P.); (C.P.); (I.T.)
- University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beckmann K, Selva-Nayagam S, Olver I, Miller C, Buckley ES, Powell K, Buranyi-Trevarton D, Gowda R, Roder D, Oehler MK. Carcinosarcomas of the Uterus: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Adjuvant Treatment. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:4633-4645. [PMID: 34140809 PMCID: PMC8203298 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s309551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uncertainties remain about the most effective treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), a rare but aggressive uterine cancer, due to the limited scope for randomized trials. This study investigates whether nodal excision or adjuvant therapies after hysterectomy offer a survival benefit, using multi-institutional clinical registry data from South Australia. Methods Data for all consecutive cases of UCS from 1980 to 2019 were extracted from the Clinical Cancer Registry. Clinical and treatment-related factors associated with disease-specific mortality (DSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with subgroup analyses by stage. Results Median follow-up for the 140 eligible cases was 21 months. 94% underwent hysterectomy, and 72% had an additional pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Furthermore, 16% received adjuvant chemotherapy; 11% adjuvant radiotherapy and 16% multimodal chemoradiotherapy, with an increase in the latter two modalities over time. DSM was reduced among those who underwent PLND (HR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.23–0.74), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18–0.84) or multimodality treatment (HR: 0.11; 95%CI: 0.06–0.30) compared with hysterectomy alone for the whole cohort and for late stage disease (FIGO III/IV) but not for earlier stage disease, except for reduced DSM with multimodal therapy. Findings were similar for ACM. Conclusion Our findings indicate better survival among those who received PLND, chemotherapy and multimodal adjuvant therapy, with the latter applying to early and late stage disease. However, cautious interpretation is warranted, due to potential “indication bias” and limited power. Further research into effective treatment modalities, ideally using prospective study designs, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Caroline Miller
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elizabeth S Buckley
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kate Powell
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Raghu Gowda
- Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Martin K Oehler
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Uterine carcinosarcoma: An overview. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103369. [PMID: 34051304 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor, is a rare gynecological malignancy characterized by poor prognosis. This "biphasic" neoplasm presents an admixture of epithelial and mesenchymal/sarcomatoid tumor cells which partially share their molecular signature and exhibit a typical epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition gene expression profile. Due to the rarity of this cancer, at present there is a scarcity of specific treatment guidelines. Surgical resection remains the best curative option for localized disease, whereas the addition of peri-operative radiotherapy, chemotherapy and chemoradiation has been shown to further improve disease outcomes. In the metastatic setting, palliative chemotherapy is currently the treatment of choice, although no consensus exists about the best regimen to be delivered. Besides standard treatment options for the advanced disease, mechanistic insights into UCS pathogenesis and identification of its histopathological and molecular features boosted the development of novel, and potentially more effective, therapeutic agents, that will be here discussed.
Collapse
|
9
|
The Effect of Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy on Distant Metastasis for Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:169-173. [PMID: 33481373 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) are rare tumors that carry a poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Standard treatment consists of surgical resection and chemotherapy, though the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has yet to be determined. This study assessed survival rates between patients with UCS who underwent surgical resection alone and patients who underwent combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical resection for UCS between 1993 and 2011 at a single institution. We assessed 3-year disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival rates and utilized Kaplan-Meier modeling to analyze differences between UCS treatment modalities. RESULTS Twenty-four patients underwent UCS surgical resection between 1993 and 2011. The mean age was 61 (range: 39 to 75 y). Of these patients, 100% (n=24) underwent surgical resection, 25% (n=6) underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, 29% (n=7) underwent surgery and adjuvant RT, and 33% (n=8) underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and RT. At 3 years median follow, there was no significant difference in overall survival between treatment modalities. The addition of radiation therapy conferred increased DMFS in patients undergoing surgery irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy (44% vs. 83%, P=0.0211).In patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, the significant increase in DMFS persisted with the addition of RT (P=0.0310). Lymph node involvement (n=8) was associated with a lower locoregional recurrence-free survival (38% vs. 92%, P=0.0029). CONCLUSIONS RT may offer a potential benefit in reducing the rate of distant metastases, though there were no statistically significant improvements in survival metrics.
Collapse
|
10
|
Adjuvant vaginal interventional radiotherapy in early-stage non-endometrioid carcinoma of corpus uteri: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:231-243. [PMID: 33897798 PMCID: PMC8060961 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review focused on rare histological types of corpus uteri malignancy, including uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), and uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC), and it is proposed to assist with clinical decision-making. Adjuvant treatment decisions must be made based on available evidences. We mainly investigated the role of vaginal interventional radiotherapy (VIRt) in UCS, UCCC, and UPSC managements. Material and methods A systematic research using PubMed and Cochrane library was conducted to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of VIRt in early-stage UPSC, UCCC, and UCS. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov was performed in order to detect ongoing or recently completed trials as well as in PROSPERO for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. Survival outcomes and toxicity rates were obtained. Results All studies were retrospective. For UCS, the number of evaluated patients was 432. The 2- to 5-year average local control (LC) was 91% (range, 74.2-96%), disease-free survival (DFS) 88% (range, 82-94%), overall survival (OS) 79% (range, 53.8-84.3%), the average 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 70% (range, 70-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. For UCCC, the number of investigated patients was 335 (UCCC – 124, mixed – 211), with an average 5-year LC of 100%, DFS of 83% (range, 82-90%), OS of 93% (range, 83-100%), and G3-G4 toxicity of 0%. For UPSC, the number of examined patients was 1,092 (UPSC – 866, mixed – 226). The average 5-year LC was 97% (range, 87.1-100%), DFS 84% (range, 74.7-95.6%), OS 93% (range, 71.9-100%), CSS 89% (range, 78.9-94%), and G3-G4 toxicity was 0%. Conclusions These data suggest that in adequately selected early-stage UPSC and UCCC patients, VIRt alone may be suitable in women who underwent surgical staging and received adjuvant chemotherapy. In early-stage UCS, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach has to be planned, considering high-rate of pelvic and distant relapses.
Collapse
|
11
|
The Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123573. [PMID: 33265910 PMCID: PMC7760981 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of radiotherapy on carcinosarcoma, a rare malignant tumor, of the uterus is unclear. We reviewed data published from 2010 on the effects of radiotherapy on tumor control and survival in this patient group. Available data were mainly from cancer registries and suggested that radiotherapy, given either as vaginal brachytherapy (contact radiotherapy of the vagina) or external-beam radiotherapy or a combination of both, reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with all stages of carcinosarcoma of the uterus without metastases in other organs. Abstract The role of postoperative radiotherapy delivered as external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) or a combination of both, in the management of carcinosarcoma of the uterus is not clearly defined, as only limited randomized trial data are available, indicating a reduction in locoregional recurrences after EBRT. We performed a structured review of data published from 2010. Although no relevant new data from prospective trials or meta-analyses were identified, 14 analyses of cancer registry data from the United States or Europe, focusing predominantly on the endpoint for overall survival, were identified, four of them using propensity-score matching to compare subgroups treated with vs. without radiotherapy. Although stage-by-stage data are rare, the registry analyses support the idea of a beneficial effect, especially of VBT, on overall survival in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA patients (to a lesser extent in stage IB). For stages II to III, the data sets indicate the largest effects on overall survival for the combination of EBRT and VBT. In all stages, survival effects of radiotherapy apparently persist when given in addition to chemotherapy. Whereas some studies see the strongest survival effects in patients with positive lymph nodes, propensity-score matched data indicate an overall survival effect of radiotherapy (EBRT + VBT or VBT alone) in FIGO stages I to III regardless of lymph node surgery.
Collapse
|
12
|
Corrado G, Ciccarone F, Cosentino F, Legge F, Rosati A, Arcieri M, Turco LC, Certelli C, Federico A, Vizza E, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Role of minimally invasive surgery versus open approach in patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas: a retrospective multicentric study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:845-852. [PMID: 32880752 PMCID: PMC7873090 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03372-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to compare surgical and survival outcome in only patients with early-stage UCSs managed by laparotomic surgery (LPT) versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Methods Data were retrospectively collected in four Italian different institutions. Inclusion criteria were UCS diagnosis confirmed by the definitive histological examination, and stage I or II according to the FIGO staging system. Results Between August 2000 and March 2019, the data relative to 170 patients bearing UCSs were collected: of these, 95 were defined as early-stage disease (stage I–II) based on the histological report at the primary surgery, and thus were included in this study. Forty-four patients were managed by LPT, and 51 patients were managed by MIS. The operative time was lower in the MIS group versus the LPT group (p value 0.021); the median estimated blood loss was less in the MIS group compared to the median of LPT group (p value < 0.0001). The length of hospital stay days was shorter in the MIS patients (p value < 0.0001). Overall, there were eight (8.4%) post-operative complications; of these, seven were recorded in the LPT group versus one in the MIS group (p value 0.023). There was no difference in the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Conclusion There was no difference of oncologic outcome between the two approaches, in face of a more favourable peri-operative and post-operative profile in the MIS group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesca Ciccarone
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise Spa, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Legge
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Arcieri
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Carlo Turco
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Gemelli Molise Spa, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Department Gynecology and Breast Care Unit, Mater Olbia Spa, Olbia, Italy
| | - Camilla Certelli
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alex Federico
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Elshaikh MA, Modh A, Jhingran A, Biagioli MC, Coleman RL, Gaffney DK, Harkenrider MM, Heskett K, Jolly S, Kidd E, Lee LJ, Li L, Portelance L, Sherertz T, Venkatessan AM, Wahl AO, Yashar CM, Small W. Executive summary of the American Radium Society® Appropriate Use Criteria for management of uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:460-466. [PMID: 32475772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCS) represent a rare but aggressive subset of endometrial cancers, comprising <5% of uterine malignancies. To date, limited prospective trials exist from which evidence-based management of this rare malignancy can be developed. METHODS The American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria presented in this manuscript are evidence-based guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel for management of women with UCS. An extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was performed. A well-established methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriate use of imaging and treatment procedures for the management of UCS. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners who desire information about the management of UCS. RESULTS The majority of patients with UCS will present with advanced extra uterine disease, with 10% presenting with metastatic disease. They have worse survival outcomes when compared to uterine high-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas. The primary treatment for non-metastatic UCS is complete surgical staging with total hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy and lymph node staging. Patients with UCS appear to benefit from adjuvant multimodality therapy to reduce the chance of tumor recurrence with the potential to improve overall survival. CONCLUSION Women diagnosed with uterine UCS should undergo complete surgical staging. Adjuvant multimodality therapies should be considered in the treatment of both early- and advanced stage patients. Long-term surveillance is indicated as many of these women may recur. Prospective clinical studies of women with UCS are necessary for optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ankit Modh
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | - Robert L Coleman
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - David K Gaffney
- University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America
| | | | - Karen Heskett
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Shruti Jolly
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | | | - Larissa J Lee
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Linna Li
- Main Line Health System, United States of America
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America
| | - Tracy Sherertz
- Washington Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Capitol Hill, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | | | - Andrew O Wahl
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States of America
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews and interprets studies on adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer published during the last 18 months. RECENT FINDINGS For patients with intermediate and high intermediate risk endometrial cancer, vaginal brachytherapy remains the adjuvant therapy of choice. New molecular markers might help to define patients in this group for whom observation only is sufficient and women who might have benefitted from external beam radiotherapy. Preliminary results from large randomized controlled trials have shown that in early stage, high-risk endometrial cancer the addition of chemotherapy to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) did not improve survival. The combination of vaginal brachytherapy with three courses of chemotherapy resulted in similar progression-free and overall survival (3 years) as EBRT. In stage III high-risk endometrial cancer, the addition of chemotherapy to EBRT improved failure-free survival but not overall survival (immature data). Chemotherapy alone had the same efficacy concerning progression-free and overall survival (immature data). SUMMARY Three large randomized clinical trials on the role of adjuvant radio and/or chemotherapy have so far provided only immature results. Discussions about changes of clinical practice should be postponed until mature data from all three trials are available. The impact of new molecular markers for risk stratification will be assessed in ongoing RCTs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Versluis M, Plat A, de Bruyn M, Matias-Guiu X, Trovic J, Krakstad C, Nijman HW, Bosse T, de Bock GH, Hollema H. L1CAM expression in uterine carcinosarcoma is limited to the epithelial component and may be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Virchows Arch 2018; 473:591-598. [PMID: 30140948 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2444-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) has been proposed as a model for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a process characterized by a functional change facilitating migration and metastasis in many types of cancer. L1CAM is an adhesion molecule that has been involved in EMT as a marker for mesenchymal phenotype. We examined expression of L1CAM in UCS in a cohort of 90 cases from four different centers. Slides were immunohistochemically stained for L1CAM and scored in four categories (0%, < 10%, 10-50%, and > 50%). A score of more than 10% was considered positive for L1CAM. The median age at presentation was 68.6 years, and half of the patients (53.3%) presented with FIGO stage 1 disease. Membranous L1CAM expression was positive in the epithelial component in 65.4% of cases. Remarkably, expression was negative in the mesenchymal component. In cases where both components were intermingled, expression limited to the epithelial component was confirmed by a double stain for L1CAM and keratin. Expression of L1CAM did not relate to overall or disease-free survival. Our findings suggest L1CAM is either not a marker for the mesenchymal phenotype in EMT, or UCS is not a good model for EMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mac Versluis
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - A Plat
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M de Bruyn
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - X Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics/Oncologic Pathology Group, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, IRBLleida, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - J Trovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Center for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - C Krakstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Center for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - H W Nijman
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G H de Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H Hollema
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|