1
|
Lima DL, de Figueiredo SMP, Pereira X, Murillo FR, Sreeramoju P, Malcher F, Damani T. Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7425-7436. [PMID: 37721592 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10379-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reinforcement of crural closure with synthetic resorbable mesh has been proposed to decrease recurrence rates after hiatal hernia repair, but continues to be controversial. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and intermediate-term results of using biosynthetic mesh to augment the hiatus. METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed throughout this systematic review. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials tools were used to perform qualitative assessment of all studies included in this review. Recommendations were then summarized for the following pre-defined key items: protocol, research question, search strategy, study eligibility, data extraction, study design, risk of bias, publication bias, and statistical analysis. RESULTS The systematic literature search found 520 articles, 101 of which were duplicates and 355 articles were determined to be unrelated to our study and excluded. The full text of the remaining 64 articles was thoroughly assessed. A total of 18 articles (1846 patients) were ultimately included for this review, describing hiatal hernia repair using three different biosynthetic meshes-BIO-A, Phasix ST, and polyglactin mesh. Mean operative time varied from 127 to 223 min. Mean follow up varied from 12 to 54 months. There were no mesh erosions or explants. One mesh-related complication of stenosis requiring reoperation was reported with BIO-A. Studies showed significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, as well as satisfaction with surgery. Recurrence was reported as radiologic or clinical recurrence. Overall, recurrence rate varied from 0.9 to 25%. CONCLUSION The use of biosynthetic mesh is safe and effective for hiatal hernia repair with low complications rates and high symptom resolution. The reported recurrence rates are highly variable due to significant heterogeneity in defining and evaluating recurrences. Further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up should be performed to better analyze outcomes and recurrence rates.
Collapse
|
2
|
Patient-tailored algorithm for laparoscopic cruroplasty standardization: comparison with hiatal surface area and medium-term outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2537-2545. [PMID: 35585260 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02556-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different methods have been described for laparoscopic hiatoplasty and hiatus hernia (HH) repair. All techniques are not standardized and the choice to reinforce or not the hiatus with a mesh is left to the operating surgeon's preference. Hiatal surface area (HSA) has been described as an attempt at standardization; in case the area is > 4 cm2, a mesh is used to reinforce the repair. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe a new patient-tailored algorithm (PTA), compare its performance in predicting crura mesh buttressing to HSA, and analyze outcomes. METHODS Retrospective, single-center, descriptive study (September 2018-September 2021). Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic HH repair. Outcomes and quality of life measured with the disease-specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and reflux symptom index (RSI) were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty patients that underwent laparoscopic hiatoplasty and Toupet fundoplication were included. The median age was 61 years (range 32-83) and the median BMI was 26.7 (range 17-36). According to the PTA, 27 patients (54%) underwent simple suture repair while crural mesh buttressing with Phasix-ST® was used in 23 (46%). According to the HSA, the median hiatus area was 4.7 cm2 while 26 patients had an HSA greater than 4 cm2. The overall concordance rate between PTA and HSA was 94% (47/50). The median hospital stay was 1.9 days (range 1-8) and the 90-day complication rate was 4%. The median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 1-35). Hernia recurrence was diagnosed in 6%. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in one patient (2%). The GERD-HRQL (p < 0.001) and RSI (p = 0.001) were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS The application of PTA for cruroplasty standardization in the setting of HH repair seems effective. While concordance with HSA is high, the PTA seems easier and promptly available in the operative theater with a potential increase in procedure standardization, reproducibility, and teaching.
Collapse
|
3
|
Paraesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication: impact on pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and quality of life. Hernia 2022; 26:1679-1685. [PMID: 35578061 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02623-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paraesophageal hiatal hernia (PEH) is characterized by protrusion of intra-abdominal organs into the posterior mediastinum. Respiratory symptoms and reduced pulmonary function have been described as possibly related to lung compression. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) for PEH repair on pulmonary function, measured with pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and respiratory symptoms. METHODS Retrospective, single-center, cohort study (November 2015-2020). All patients that completed pre- and postoperative (12 months) PFTs assessment were included. The gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), reflux symptom index (RSI) and short form-36 (SF-36) were used. RESULTS Overall, 71 patients were included. The median age was 67.1 years and the majority were females (78.8%). Baseline PFTs were within normal limits in 91% of patients. At 12 month follow-up, total lung capacity (TLC) (4.77 vs. 5.07 L; p = 0.0251), vital capacity (VC) (2.97 vs. 3.31 L; p = 0.0065), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (2.07 vs. 2.44 L; p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (2.78 vs. 3.19 L; p < 0.001) were significantly improved. No significant differences were found for diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (17.09 vs. 17.24; p = 0.734), and FEV1/FVC (0.77 vs. 0.77; p = 0.967). Interestingly, improvements were more pronounced in patients with large PEH (type IIIb and IV). At 12 month follow-up, both gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms were significantly improved and 94% of patients were satisfied with the operation. The GERD-HRQL (18.1 ± 7.9 vs. 4.01 ± 2.4; p = 0.001), RSI (37.8 ± 9.7 vs. 10.6 ± 8.9; p < 0.001) and all SF-36 items were improved. CONCLUSIONS LTF for the treatment of PEH is safe and seems to be effective up to 12 month follow-up with improved lung volumes, spirometry values, quality of life, gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms.
Collapse
|
4
|
Date AR, Goh YM, Goh YL, Rajendran I, Date RS. Quality of life after giant hiatus hernia repair: A systematic review. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17:435-449. [PMID: 33885030 PMCID: PMC8486064 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_233_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic giant hiatus hernia (GHH), and quality of life (QoL) has become an important outcome measure following surgery. The aim of this study is to review the literature assessing QoL following repair of GHH. METHODOLOGY A systematic literature search was performed by two reviewers independently to identify original studies evaluating QoL outcomes after GHH surgery. MeSH terms such as paraoesophageal; hiatus hernia; giant hiatus hernia and quality of life were used in the initial search. Original studies in English language using validated questionnaires on humans were included. Review articles, conference abstracts and case reports and studies with duplicate data were excluded. RESULTS Two hundred and eight articles were identified on initial search, of which 38 studies (4404 patients) were included. Studies showed a significant heterogeneity in QoL assessment tools, surgical techniques and follow-up methods. All studies assessing both pre-operative and post-operative QoL (n = 31) reported improved QoL on follow-up after surgical repair of GHH. Improvement in QoL following GHH repair was not affected by patient age, surgical technique or the use of mesh. Recurrence of GHH after surgery may, however, adversely impact QoL. CONCLUSION Surgical repair of GHH improved QoL scores in all the 38 studies. The impact of recurrence on QoL needs further assessment. The authors also recommend uniform reporting of surgical outcomes in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay R. Date
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital, Basildon, Essex, UK
| | - Yan Mei Goh
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Yan Li Goh
- National Bowel Research Centre (NBRC), Blizzard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ilayaraja Rajendran
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - Ravindra S. Date
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yano F, Tsuboi K, Omura N, Hoshino M, Yamamoto SR, Akimoto S, Masuda T, Mitsumori N, Ikegami T. Treatment strategy for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair. Asian J Endosc Surg 2021; 14:684-691. [PMID: 33472278 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION According to the anatomy-function-pathology classification, the recurrence rates of A2 and A3 hiatal hernia (HH) after laparoscopic fundoplication are higher than the rate of A1 HH. Therefore, we introduced mesh reinforcement for A2 and A3 cases. In addition, gastropexy was added to A3 cases. We present the strategy for HH repair. METHODS In all, 537 patients (mean age 55.4 ± 16.7 years, 219 women) who underwent primary laparoscopic fundoplication for HH from January 1995 to October 2019 were included. They were divided into three groups by A factor (A1:A2:A3 = 296:156:85). Their clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The median age (years) of the patients in each group was A1:A2:A3 = 46:63:74 years, and age was directly proportional to the size of HH (P < 0.0001). The proportion of females was significantly higher in A3 than in other classes (P < 0.0001). Preoperative reflux esophagitis was severe in A2 (P < 0.0001) and operation time (min) was directly proportional to HH size (A1:A2:A3 = 135:167:193, P < 0.0001). The recurrence rate of conventional laparoscopic fundoplication was 15% (46/304), and it was higher for A2 and A3 than for A1 (P = 0.027). However, with reinforcement of the hiatus using a mesh and gastropexy, the recurrence rates decreased. CONCLUSION Combining mesh reinforcement and gastropexy may reduce the recurrence rate of para- and mixed-type HH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiaki Yano
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuto Tsuboi
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuo Omura
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Hoshino
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Se R Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Akimoto
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Masuda
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norio Mitsumori
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel NM, Puri A, Sounderajah V, Ferri L, Griffiths E, Low D, Maynard N, Mueller C, Pera M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Watson DI, Zaninotto G, Hanna GB, Markar SR. Quality of life and symptom assessment in paraesophageal hernias: a systematic literature review of reporting standards. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:6090336. [PMID: 33434921 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) present with a range of symptoms affecting physical and mental health. This systematic review aims to assess the quality of reporting standards for patients with PEH, identify the most frequently used quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity assessment tools in PEH and to ascertain additional symptoms reported by these patients not captured by these tools. METHODS A systematic literature review according to PRISMA protocols was carried out following a literature search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies published between January 1960 and May 2020. Published abstracts from conference proceedings were included. Data on QOL tools used and reported symptoms were extracted. RESULTS This review included 220 studies reporting on 28 353 patients. A total of 46 different QOL and symptom severity tools were used across all studies, and 89 different symptoms were reported. The most frequently utilized QOL tool was the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease-Health related quality of life questionnaire symptom severity instrument (47.7%), 57.2% of studies utilized more than 2 QOL tools and 'dysphagia' was the most frequently reported symptom, in 55.0% of studies. Notably, respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms, although less common than GI symptoms, were reported and included 'dyspnea' reported in 35 studies (15.9%). CONCLUSIONS There lacks a QOL assessment tool that captures the range of symptoms associated with PEH. Reporting standards for this cohort must be improved to compare patient outcomes before and after surgery. Further investigations must seek to develop a PEH specific tool, that encompasses the relative importance of symptoms when considering surgical intervention and assessing symptomatic improvement following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil M Patel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Aiysha Puri
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ewen Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Donald Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nick Maynard
- Oxford Esophagogastric Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carmen Mueller
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Manuel Pera
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - David I Watson
- Flinders University, Discipline of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Saino G, Sozzi A, Bonitta G, Micheletto G, Campanelli G, Bona D. Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach. Hernia 2020; 26:619-626. [DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
8
|
Correa Restrepo J, Morales Uribe CH, Toro Vásquez JP. Reparación laparoscópica de hernia hiatal gigante. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIRUGÍA 2020. [DOI: 10.30944/20117582.580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introducción. La reparación laparoscópica es el estándar de tratamiento en hernia hiatal gigante. Sin embargo, a pesar de su baja morbilidad, la tasa de recurrencia sigue siendo alta. Nuestro objetivo fue describir los resultados de la reparación laparoscópica de hernia hiatal gigante, independientemente de la técnica de cruroplastia empleada. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes llevados a reparación laparoscópica de hernia hiatal gigante en el periodo 2009-2017. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, la técnica quirúrgica, las complicaciones y la estancia hospitalaria. Se revisaron los resultados de la endoscopia, la radiografía de vías digestivas altas y la escala de síntomas GERD-HRQOL, obtenidos luego de un año de cirugía. Resultados. Se incluyeron 44 pacientes con un tamaño promedio de la hernia de 7 cm. Se practicó cruroplastia con sutura simple en 36,4 %, sutura más refuerzo con politetrafluoroetileno (PTFE) o dacrón, en 59,1 %, y se usó malla en 4,5 %. Hubo 12 complicaciones, la estancia hospitalaria promedio fue de 3,5 días y no hubo mortalidad. Se encontró recurrencia endoscópica o radiológica en 6/20 pacientes, todas pequeñas y asintomáticas. En 23 pacientes, la escala GERD-HRQOL reportó un valor promedio de 7,7 y 78 % de satisfacción. Solo un paciente requirió cirugía de revisión. Conclusión. El método preferido de reparación laparoscópica de la hernia hiatal gigante es la cruroplastia sin malla, técnica asociada a baja morbilidad y adecuado control de los síntomas. La tasa de recurrencia es similar a la reportada en la literatura. Se requieren estudios prospectivos con seguimiento completo a largo plazo para validar estos resultados.
Collapse
|
9
|
Panici Tonucci T, Asti E, Sironi A, Ferrari D, Bonavina L. Safety and Efficacy of Crura Augmentation with Phasix ST Mesh for Large Hiatal Hernia: 3-Year Single-Center Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:369-372. [PMID: 31910348 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Safety and effectiveness of absorbable meshes for laparoscopic hiatus hernia repair are still debated. This may be due to patient selection, technique of repair, type and shape of mesh, definition of recurrent hernia, and length of follow-up. The aim of this study was to assess safety, short-term efficacy, and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia reinforced with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh. Materials and Methods: A single-center observational cohort study was conducted in patients with large type III-IV hiatal hernia who underwent laparoscopic crural repair reinforced with Phasix ST®, a monofilament resorbable mesh (poly-4-hydroxybuterate) with a hydrogel barrier on one side. Patient data were extracted from hospital charts and a prospectively updated research database. Both generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) and disease-specific (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life [GERD-HRQL]) questionnaires were used to assess preoperative and postoperative quality of life. Results: From January 2017 to July 2019, 73 consecutive patients were implanted with Phasix ST mesh. The median follow-up was 17 (interquartile range 9-24) months. Recurrent hernia was found in 2 of 62 (3.2%) patients followed for more than 6 months after surgery, but none required reoperation. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 8.2%. No mesh-related complications occurred. Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement of all items of the SF-36 questionnaire (P < .001) and of the median GERD-HRQL score (P < .001). Conclusion: The use of Phasix ST mesh to reinforce crural repair for large hiatus hernias is safe, is effective in the short-term follow-up, and is associated to improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Panici Tonucci
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Asti
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Sironi
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Davide Ferrari
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|