Increased Prevalence of Esophageal Eosinophilia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Eosinophils, Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are complex, multifactorial chronic inflammatory disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Their epidemiology, particularly for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), is increasing worldwide, with a rise in the co-diagnosis of IBD and EGIDs. Both disorders share common risk factors, such as early exposure to antibiotics or specific dietary habits. Moreover, from a molecular perspective, eosinophilic infiltration is crucial in the diagnosis of eosinophilic disorders, and it also plays a pivotal role in IBD histological diagnosis. Indeed, recent evidence highlights the significant role of eosinophils in the health of the intestinal mucosal barrier and as mediators between innate and acquired immunity, even indicating a potential role in IBD pathogenesis. This narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the common clinical and molecular aspects of EGIDs and IBD and the current state of knowledge regarding overlap conditions and their pathogenesis.

METHODS

Pubmed was searched until May 2023 to assess relevant studies describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapy of EGIDs in IBD.

RESULTS

The immune pathways and mechanisms underlying both EGIDs and IBD remain partially known. An improved understanding of the role of eosinophils in overlapping conditions could lead to enhanced diagnostic precision, the development of more effective future therapeutic strategies, and a more accurate prediction of patient response. Consequently, the identification of red flags indicative of an eosinophilic disorder in IBD patients is of paramount importance and must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Associations of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders with Other Gastrointestinal and Allergic Diseases

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are becoming more common causing significant suffering and reduced quality of life. These conditions can affect different parts of the digestive system, either individually or in combination. Recognition of their link to allergic disorders or other gastrointestinal (GI) diseases has raised questions about their shared underlying mechanisms, which has had implications for diagnosis and management. The authors critically examine the current understanding of the connection between EGIDs and allergic conditions (ie, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, and food allergy) and GI diseases (ie, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and motility disorders).

Epidemiologic and Clinical Clues to the Etiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Despite the rising prevalence and incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Studies to date suggest that complex interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors result in the development and presentation of disease. Examining environmental factors both in the early life and later life exposures offers potential clues for the development of EoE, although challenges exist in making causal inferences due to diagnostic delay and access, ascertainment biases, and misclassification of cases. The authors review studies supporting early life factors as etiologic factors in the development of EoE.

A Comprehensive Global Population-Based Analysis on the Coexistence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

We explored inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) coexistence using a global dataset. Investigating their epidemiology, risks, and impact, we aimed to enhance the understanding of concurrent diagnoses and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using deidentified patient data from the TriNetX database (2011-2022). We estimated the incidence and prevalence of EoE in patients with IBD, including both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and vice versa. Risks of select immune-mediated conditions and disease complications were compared among patients with EoE, IBD, or concurrent diagnoses.

RESULTS

Our results included 174,755 patients with CD; 150,774 patients with UC; and 44,714 patients with EoE. The risk of EoE was significantly higher among patients with CD (prevalence ratio [PR] 11.2) or UC (PR 8.7) compared with individuals without IBD. The risk of IBD was higher in patients with EoE (CD: PR 11.6; UC: PR 9.1) versus those without EoE. A propensity-matched analysis of IBD patients revealed that, when comparing patients with and without EoE, the relative risk of immune-mediated comorbidities was significantly greater for celiac disease, IBD-related inflammatory conditions, eczema and asthma (CD: n = 1896; UC: n = 1231; p < 0.001). Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of EoE and IBD had a higher composite risk of IBD-related complications (CD: adjusted HR (aHR) 1.14, p < 0.005; UC: aHR 1.17, p < 0.01) and lower risk of food bolus impaction (aHR 0.445, p = 0.0011).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous EoE and IBD increased IBD-related complications risk, needing more treatment (glucocorticoids, biologic therapy, abdominal surgery), while reducing EoE-related issues like food bolus impaction.

Role of peripheral and tissue eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID), and functional abdominal pain disorder (FAPD) present with nonspecific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms clinically and also have some similarities in pathogeneses associated with eosinophils. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the role of eosinophils in IBD compared to EGID and FAPD by investigating eosinophils in peripheral blood and GI tissue and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP).

METHODS

Pediatric patients with chronic GI symptoms who underwent endoscopic biopsies were enrolled. Complete blood cell counts, inflammatory markers, immunoglobulin E (IgE), serum ECP levels, and endoscopic and histopathologic findings were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patients were included: 179 with EGID, 107 with IBDs, and 82 with FAPD. Peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC), total IgE, and serum ECP were significantly higher in both IBD and EGID than in FAPD (all p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences were noted among the three groups in tissue eosinophil counts in each segment of GI tract except for the esophagus (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in tissue eosinophil counts in the ascending, sigmoid colon, and rectum between EGID and IBD (p < 0.05). Peripheral and tissue eosinophils in the stomach and duodenum revealed positive correlation in both EGID and IBD (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Elevated eosinophil-related markers, as well as increased tissue eosinophilic infiltration in the affected areas of the GI tract in both IBD and EGID compared to FAPD, suggest that eosinophils might play a common important role in the pathogeneses of both diseases.

Eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with increased risk of later inflammatory bowel disease in a nationwide Swedish population cohort

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies on the possible association between eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been contradictory.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-verified EoE diagnosed between 1990 and 2017 in Sweden (n = 1587) were age- and sex-matched with up to five general population reference individuals (n = 7808). EoE was defined using pathology reports from all 28 pathology centers in Sweden (the ESPRESSO study). Multivariate Cox regression then estimated hazard ratios for future IBD. IBD was defined based on the international classification of disease codes and histopathology codes. In secondary analyses, sibling comparators were used to further reduce potential familial confounding. Additionally, we performed logistic regression examining earlier IBD in EoE.

RESULTS

During follow-up until 2020, 16 (0.01%) EoE patients and 21 (0.003%) general population reference individuals diagnosed with IBD, corresponding to a 3.5-fold increased risk of future IBD (aHR = 3.56; 95% CI 1.79-7.11). EoE was linked to Crohn's disease (aHR = 3.39 [95% CI 1.02-9.60]) but not to ulcerative colitis (aHR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.38-4.86). Compared to their siblings, patients with EoE were at a 2.48-fold increased risk of IBD (aHR = 2.48; 95% CI 0.92-6.70). Earlier IBD was 15 times more likely in EoE patients than in matched reference individuals (odds ratio, 15.39; 95% CI 7.68-33.59).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide cohort study, EoE was associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of later IBD diagnosis. This risk increase may be due to shared genetic or early environmental risk factors, but also surveillance bias could play a role.

Food Allergy Characteristics Associated With Coexisting Eosinophilic Esophagitis in FARE Registry Participants

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) can coexist in individuals with food allergy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the characteristics of food-allergic patients with and without coexisting EoE using a large food allergy patient registry.

METHODS

Data were derived from 2 Food Allergy Research & Education, Inc, Patient Registry surveys. A series of multivariable regression models were used to evaluate associations between demographic, comorbidity, and food allergy characteristics and the likelihood of reporting EoE.

RESULTS

Five percent (n = 309) of registry participants (n = 6074; ages <1 year->80 years, mean, 20.20 ± 15.37 years) reported having EoE. The odds of having EoE were significantly greater in male participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72) and those with comorbid asthma (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.55-2.49), allergic rhinitis (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.37-2.22), oral allergy syndrome (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.09-3.70), food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.34-4.84), and hyper-IgE syndrome (aOR, 7.6; 95% CI, 2.93-19.92), though not atopic dermatitis (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.99-1.59), when adjusting for demographics (sex, age, race, ethnicity, and geographic location). Those with a greater number of food allergies (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.23-1.32), more frequent food-related allergic reactions (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.11-1.24), previous anaphylaxis (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.15-1.83), and health care utilization for food-related allergic reactions (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67)-specifically intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33)-were more likely to have EoE after controlling for demographics. However, no significant difference in ever using epinephrine for food-related allergic reactions was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

These self-reported data showed that coexisting EoE is associated with an increased number of food allergies, food-related allergic reactions per year, and measures of reaction severity, calling attention to the likely increased health care needs of food-allergic patients with EoE.

[Inflammatory bowel diseases and upper gastrointestinal tract]

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are inflammatory diseases with a flare-up evolution and an unknown etiology. Inflammatory lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract are more and more often described in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The aim of this article was to review the inflammatory lesions of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum currently described in the IBD.

Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in a Large Cohort of Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Scarce data have investigated the association between pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We, therefore, aimed to describe the epidemiology and the possible peculiar phenotype and natural history of such an association.

METHODS

Case-control study is based on the Italian Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology (SIGENP) national registry. All children with a combined diagnosis of IBD and EoE were included. The overall prevalence and incidence in 2 periods, 2009 to 2015, and 2016 to 2021, were calculated. Cases were matched with IBD only and EoE only patients in a 1:3:3 ratio. Phenotype and outcomes (courses of steroids, risk of complications, surgery, treatment escalation, and hospitalization) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (age 11.2 ± 2.8 years, Males 91%) with EoE-IBD out of 3090 patients with IBD were identified, resulting in an overall prevalence of 0.35% and an incidence of 0.18% for 2009 to 2015 and 0.45% for 2016 to 2021. Treatment escalation rates for IBD were significantly higher in patients with IBD compared with EoE-IBD at 12- and 24-month follow-up (0% vs 30%, P = .04; and 9% vs 45.5%, P = .03, respectively). Furthermore, patients with IBD were at a significantly higher risk of hospitalization than both EoE-IBD and EoE patients (log rank P < .001). We found no significant differences in major outcomes related to the EoE course in EoE-IBD patients compared with EoE ones.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and prevalence of EoE in children with IBD are low, although the incidence seems to be rising in recent years. Having EoE appears to be associated with a milder IBD disease course, whereas having IBD does not seem to affect the natural history of EoE. More data are needed to better define the phenotype of such association.

Association of eosinophilic esophagitis with autoimmune and connective tissue disorders, and the impact on treatment response

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been associated with autoimmune (AI) and connective tissue disorders (CTDs), but clinical correlates and treatment response to topical corticosteroids (tCS) for patients with both conditions are not well known. We aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical features of AI/CTDs in EoE patients, and assess the response to tCS. In this retrospective cohort study of adults and children newly diagnosed with EoE in the University of North Carolina EoE Clinicopathologic database, we extracted clinical characteristics and treatment response data. We compared EoE patients with and without AI/CTDs, identified independently associated factors, and explored treatment responses. Of 1029 EoE patients, 61 (5.9%) had an AI/CTDs. The most common AI/CTDs were psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (P/PA) (1.7%), Hashimoto's (1.2%), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (1%). Compared to those without AI/CTDs, AI/CTDs patients were older (35 vs. 28 years, P = 0.004), more likely to be female (51% vs. 30%, P = 0.001), have insurance (93% vs. 78%, P = 0.004) and a longer symptom duration prior to EoE diagnosis (10 vs. 7 years, P = 0.02). Older age, female sex, having insurance, and having allergic rhinitis were independently associated with AI/CTDs. AI/CTD patients with EoE were less likely to have a symptom response (47% vs. 79%, P = 0.003). Overlap between EoE and AI/CTDs was uncommon, seen in approximately 6%, with P/PA, Hashimoto's, and RA being most frequent. In conclusion, older age, female sex, having insurance, and allergic rhinitis were independently associated with AI/CTDs. EoE patients with AI/CTDs had less symptom response, with trendtowards lower endoscopic and histologic responses, to tCS therapy.

Differences in Clinical Presentation of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Pediatric Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn Disease

SIGNIFICANCE

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an inflammatory condition characterized by T helper-2 (T H 2) cytokines. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) are inflammatory conditions with different clinical presentations and immune profiles. UC is associated with T H 2 cytokines and CD with T H 1 cytokines. We investigated potential differences in the association of EoE with UC and CD because of these different immune profiles.

METHODS

We utilized ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to find patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and EoE. We defined EoE as any esophageal biopsy with >15 eosinophils. We collected demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histological data.

RESULTS

Thirty patients had both EoE and IBD. 14.9% of UC patients had EoE and 5.7% of CD patients had EoE. 64.7% of UC patients presented with UC and EoE at the same time, whereas 76.9% of CD patients presented with EoE at follow up. Ten of 13 CD patients were on anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at EoE diagnosis. No UC patients were on anti-TNF at EoE diagnosis. Eighty-three percent of CD patients had mild disease or were in remission, whereas 50% of UC patients had moderate to severe disease at the time of EoE diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

A higher percentage of UC than CD patients had EoE. EoE was more likely to be present at the initial diagnosis of UC than CD. EoE was more likely after diagnosis and treatment of CD with anti-TNF, when CD activity was mild or in remission. The difference in presentation suggests that anti-TNF or it's impact on inflammation may differentially impact the association of EoE with CD and UC.

Mimics of Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disease that can affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract. Associated symptoms can vary based on the severity of disease, extent of involvement, presence of extraintestinal manifestations, and development of complications. Diagnosis is based on a constellation of findings. Many diseases can mimic Crohn's disease and lead to diagnostic conundrums. These include entities associated with the gastrointestinal luminal tract, vascular disease, autoimmune processes, various infections, malignancies and complications, drug- or treatment-induced conditions, and genetic diseases. Careful consideration of possible causes is necessary to establish the correct diagnosis.

Insight into Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis: Is the Answer Blowing in the Wind?

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are conditions characterized by immune dysregulation to a trigger in those with a genetic predisposition. Environmental factors are thought to contribute to IBD, but no definite trigger has been identified. Aeroallergens have not been thoroughly investigated in their potential contribution to the pathogenesis to IBD. The geographic distribution of aeroallergens and IBD, the association of atopic disease with IBD, seasonality and IBD, and cross-reactive food allergens require further study with implications for targeted dietary and immunomodulatory therapies.

Disaccharidase Deficiency in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Disaccharidase (DS) deficiencies have been reported in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the relationship between duodenal inflammation and DS deficiency has not been evaluated outside of lactase deficiency. Methods: This study assessed DS levels and DS deficiencies in pediatric IBD patients who underwent endoscopy with assessment of DS activity. Records were reviewed for IBD subtype, pathology findings, and the results of DS analysis. Results: A total of 136 patients were identified. Overall, 89 (65.4%) patients had a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD), 31 (22.8%) patients had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC), and 16 (11.8%) patients had a diagnosis of indeterminant colitis. Lactase deficiency was identified in 55.9% of patients, followed by maltase deficiency (19.9%), sucrase and palatinase deficiency (14%), and pan-deficiency (12.5%). When analyzing only patients with CD, patients with duodenitis were more likely to exhibit sucrase deficiency, palatinase deficiency, and pan-deficiency with a trend towards maltase deficiency. Conclusions: The most common DS deficiency was lactase deficiency; however, this was not related to duodenal inflammation. Pediatric patients with CD and duodenal inflammation exhibit DS deficiencies, namely, sucrase, palatinase, and pan-deficiency. Dietary adjustments may be warranted temporarily until duodenal inflammation is healed in patients with CD and duodenitis.

Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Histologic Clues and Pitfalls

The upper gastrointestinal (UGI) manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are frequently obscured by classic ileal and colonic symptoms and are reported to involve only 0.5% to 4% of adult patients. However, because of the improvement of endoscopic techniques and the growing use of esophagogastroduodenososcopy with biopsy, both asymptomatic and clinically significant esophageal, gastric, and duodenal manifestations are increasingly recognized. The UGI involvement in IBD was historically synonymous with Crohn's disease (CD), but the doctrine of ulcerative colitis (UC) being limited to the colon has been challenged, and UC-related gastroduodenal lesions have been reported. The diagnosis of UGI IBD should ideally rely on a combination of the clinical history, endoscopic picture, and histologic features. Although endoscopic changes such as aphthoid or longitudinal ulcers and bamboo-joint-like pattern are suggestive of CD, histologic evaluation increases the sensitivity of the IBD diagnosis since histologic alterations may be present in endoscopically unremarkable mucosa. Conversely, in many cases, the histologic findings are nonspecific, and the knowledge of clinical history is vital for reaching an accurate diagnosis. The presence of epithelioid granuloma is highly suggestive of CD but is present in a minority of CD cases; thus, pathologists should be aware of how to diagnose UGI IBD in the absence of granulomata. This article reviews the most important clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features of IBD-associated esophagitis, gastritis, and duodenitis, as well as the IBD-related manifestations in the biliary tract and the postcolectomy setting.

Prevalence of Autoimmune Disease in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Cross-sectional Study of Three Hospitals in Japan

Objective Recent studies have found higher rates of autoimmune diseases, such as celiac disease, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) than in the general population. This study investigated the concomitant rate of autoimmune disease among Japanese patients with EoE and evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of EoE patients with autoimmune disease. Methods The medical records of patients diagnosed with EoE between April 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, were reviewed. We analyzed the concomitant rate of autoimmune diseases in patients with EoE and compared the clinical and histological differences between patients with and without autoimmune disease. Results Sixty-four patients with EoE were enrolled. Of them, 1 had ulcerative colitis (1.6%), 1 had autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 2 (1.6%), and 6 had endometriosis (28.5% of women, 44.4% of reproductive-aged women). No significant differences in the clinical course or histological findings were found between EoE patients with and without autoimmune diseases. No complications, including stenosis, were seen in EoE with autoimmune disease, and most patients with EoE and autoimmune diseases were responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Conclusion In this study, 8 out of 64 patients with EoE had an autoimmune-related disease, including ulcerative colitis (n=1, 1.6%), autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 2 (n=1, 1.6%), or endometriosis (n=6, 44.4% of women of reproductive age), which is higher than that previously reported in the general population. Further investigations are required to clarify the relationship between EoE and autoimmune diseases.

Eosinophilic esophagitis-established facts and new horizons

Despite dramatic advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis and course of disease in the relatively short timeframe since the discovery and first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) less than three decades ago, many open questions remain to be elucidated. For instance, we will need to better characterize atypical clinical presentations of EoE and other forms of esophageal inflammatory conditions with often similar clinical presentations, nut fulfilling current diagnostic criteria for EoE and to determine their significance and interrelationship with genuine EoE. In addition, the interrelationship of EoE with other immune-mediated diseases remains to be clarified. Hopefully, a closer look at the role of environmental factors and their interaction with genetic susceptibility often in context of atopic predisposition may enable identifying the candidate substances/agents/allergens and potentially earlier (childhood) events to trigger the condition. It appears plausible to assume that in the end—comparable to current concepts in other immune-mediated chronic diseases, such as for instance inflammatory bowel disease or asthma bronchiale—we will not be rewarded with the identification of a “one-and-only” underlying pathogenetic trigger factor, with causal responsibility for the disease in each and every EoE patient. Rather, the relative contribution and importance of intrinsic susceptibility, i.e., patient-driven factors (genetics, aberrant immune response) and external trigger factors, such as food (or aero-) allergens as well as early childhood events (e.g., infection and exposure to antibiotics and other drugs) may substantially differ among given individuals with EoE. Accordingly, selection and treatment duration of medical therapy, success rates and extent of required restriction in dietary treatment, and the need for mechanical treatment to address strictures and stenosis require an individualized approach, tailored to each patient. With the advances of emerging treatment options, the importance of such an individualized and patient-centered assessment will increase even further.

The Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Concomitant Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have not been extensively investigated.

Methods

We determined treatment outcomes and frequencies of disease-related complications in patients with EoE and IBD.

Results

Among 69 patients who met inclusion criteria, 39 (56.5%) had a diagnosis of Crohn disease. Clinical and histologic response rates to proton pump inhibitors and topical steroids were 25.9% and 24.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

Lower than expected clinical and histologic response rates for EoE suggest the combination of EoE and IBD is a medically refractory phenotype with more difficult to treat EoE.

Twist1 sustains the apoptosis resistance in eosinophils in nasal mucosa of allergic rhinitis

Eosinophils (Eos) are the canonical effector cells in allergic rhinitis (AR) and many inflammatory diseases. The mechanism of eosinophilia occurring in the lesion sites is not fully understood yet. Twist1 protein (Twist, in short) is an apoptosis inhibitor that also has immune regulatory functions. This study aims to investigate the role of Twist in the pathogenesis of eosinophilia in AR. In this study, surgically removed human nasal mucosal samples were obtained from patients with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps with AR (the AR group) or without AR (the nAR group). Eos were isolated from the samples by flow cytometry. We found that abundant Eos were obtained from the surgically removed nasal mucosa tissues of both nAR and AR groups. Significantly higher Ras activation was detected in AR Eos than that in nAR Eos. Ras activation was associated with the apoptosis resistance in AR Eos. The Twist (an apoptosis inhibitor) expression was higher in AR Eos, which was positively correlated with the Ras activation status. The sensitization to IgG induced Twist expression in Eos, in which Ras activated the MAPK-HIF-1α pathway, the latter promoted the Twist gene transcription. Twist bound Rac GTPase activating protein-1 to sustain the Ras activation in Eos. Ras activation sustained the apoptosis resistance in Eos. In conclusion, high Ras activation was detected in the AR nasal mucosal tissue-isolated Eos. IgG-sensitization induced Ras activation and Twist expression in Eos, that conferred Eos the apoptosis resistance.

Phenotype and Natural History of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients With Concomitant Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The co-occurrence of autoimmune diseases is well recognized. Though studies have suggested that eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is more common in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), whether co-occurrence of EoE modifies natural history of IBD is unknown.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study at a referral center. Cases consisted of patients with IBD and EoE, with both diseases diagnosed using established criteria. Controls comprised patients with IBD without concomitant EoE. Two controls were selected per case and were matched for duration of IBD. Relevant covariates regarding disease presentation and natural history were extracted from the medical record and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 95 IBD-EoE cases and 190 IBD controls were included in our study. The IBD-EoE group was diagnosed with IBD at a younger age than those with IBD alone (22.3 years vs 29.0 years; P < 0.001) and were more likely to be male (80.0% vs 45.8%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in medical or surgical therapy for IBD between the 2 groups. Among those with IBD-EoE, patients for whom IBD was diagnosed first presented more commonly with dysphagia (50.8% vs 26.9%; P = 0.04) and endoscopically had evidence of esophageal rings (50.0% vs 23.1%; P = 0.02) when compared with those where EoE was diagnosed first.

CONCLUSION

Patients with concurrent IBD-EoE are diagnosed at a younger age and more likely to be males but have similar natural history as those without EoE. There were differences in EoE phenotype based on whether the EoE or IBD was diagnosed first.

Comorbid Occurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

In a previous study, we found a variety of inverse associations between the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the occurrence of various forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as well as microscopic colitis (MC) and its 2 subtypes of lymphocytic and collagenous colitis.¹ Two recent studies suggested a 5-fold increase in the occurrence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) among IBD patients.^2,3 The aim of the present study was to confirm these positive associations between EoE and IBD.

Comorbid Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rising with similar patterns. Co-occurrence of both diseases in the same patient has been increasingly reported. We sought to examine the pediatric population with both EoE and IBD to better understand the epidemiology and clinical implications of this overlap.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study at 2 tertiary care children's hospitals. Subjects with both EoE and IBD were identified and compared with randomly selected controls with EoE and IBD alone in terms of: demographics, atopic conditions, IBD classification, location and phenotype of Crohn disease (CD), IBD medications, endoscopic findings, and histopathology. Descriptive statistics summarized the data.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven subjects with dual-diagnosis were identified across both institutions. The prevalence of IBD in the EoE population was 2.2% and EoE in IBD was 1.5%. Subjects with both diseases were more likely to have IgE-mediated food allergy compared with IBD alone (36% vs 7%, P < 0.001). Subjects with CD-EoE were less likely to have perianal disease than CD alone (2% vs 20%, P = 0.004). There was no difference in fibrostenotic EoE between the dual-diagnosis group and EoE alone. Treatment with a TNF-alpha inhibitor (anti-TNF) for management of preexisting IBD was protective against development of EoE with a relative risk of 0.314 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.159-0.619].

CONCLUSIONS

This is a unique population in whom the underlying pathway leading to dual-diagnosis is unclear. Concomitant atopic conditions, especially IgE-mediated food allergy, and medication exposures, particularly anti-TNFs, may help predict likelihood of developing dual-diagnosis.

Epidemiology and risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis: lessons for clinicians

INTRODUCTION

The rapid expansion in the epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is being documented, along with cumulative research assessing environmental exposures associated with EoE and susceptibility due to genetic variants.

AREAS COVERED

Incidence rates for EoE of 5-10 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants annually have shown an increase in recent reports of up to 20 in some countries; the highest prevalence being reported for Europe and North America, where EoE now affects more than 1 out of 1,000 people. EoE has been shown to be associated with several disorders, Th2-mediated atopies being the most common. Patients with EoE exhibit increased frequency of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema, and EoE has been considered as a late component of the atopic march. Risk variants in TSLP, CAPN14 and LRCC32 genes, among others, have all been related to EoE, and interact with prenatal and early life exposure potentially modifying abundance and composition of gut microbiome. Dysregulated interactions between bacteria and mucosal immunity emerge as leading causes of EoE.

EXPERT OPINION

The expanding epidemiology of EoE, the resources needed and subsequent increasing healthcare costs require additional effort to optimize cost-effective management and unveil mechanisms that enhance the development of future preventive strategies.

Mucosal Eosinophilia Is an Independent Predictor of Vedolizumab Efficacy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

Peripheral and mucosal eosinophilia may be associated with more aggressive disease in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Vedolizumab blocks T lymphocytes, eosinophil adhesion, and extravasation in the gastrointestinal tract. It is not known if mucosal eosinophilia is a predictor for the therapeutic efficacy of vedolizumab.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of IBD patients with ileal or colonic biopsies who were off steroids before starting vedolizumab. Biopsies were rereviewed by pathologists, and mean eosinophil density was quantified. Patient characteristics and steroid-free clinical response 6 months after beginning vedolizumab were determined. Features were compared between nonresponders and responders, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of clinical response.

RESULTS

Of 251 IBD patients starting vedolizumab therapy, 65 patients (48% Crohn's disease, 52% ulcerative colitis) met inclusion criteria. All IBD patients not responding to vedolizumab were more likely to have a higher baseline mean eosinophil count (340 ± 156 vs 236 ± 124; P = 0.004), be previously exposed to an anti-TNF (96% vs 56%; P = 0.001), and be male (58% vs 28%; P = 0.02). Mean eosinophil counts were significantly increased in colonic biopsies in UC nonresponders (438 ± 149 vs 299 ± 145; P = 0.01). A similar trend was seen in CD nonresponders. On multivariable analysis, colonic eosinophil density and prior anti-TNF exposure-and the combination of both-were independent predictors of response.

CONCLUSION

In ulcerative colitis, colonic eosinophilia and prior anti-TNF exposure were independent predictors of 6-month clinical nonresponse to vedolizumab. Mucosal eosinophil density as a novel biomarker should be explored in larger patient cohorts.Aside from the previous anti-TNF exposure, eosinophil density in the colon of patients with UC is a negative predictor for a steroid-free long-term response to vedolizumab. The degree colonic eosinophilia may be a novel biomarker that should be further explored.