1
|
Chung KC, Wu KL, Su YL, Cheng KC, Tang CE, Song LC, Chen HH, Lee KC. Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 75 Years and Older: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:1121-1130. [PMID: 38848125 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted surgery has been increasingly adopted in colorectal cancer resection. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to compare the inpatient outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in patients aged 75 years and older. DESIGN A retrospective, population-based study. SETTINGS This study analyzed data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2018. PATIENTS Patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older and who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and total hospital costs were assessed. RESULTS Data from 14,108 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, any postoperative complications (adjusted OR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; p = 0.030) and prolonged length of stay (adjusted OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; p = 0.001) were significantly less in the robotic than the laparoscopic group. In addition, robotic surgery was associated with significantly higher total hospital costs (26.06 USD greater cost; 95% CI, 21.35-30.77 USD; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS The analysis was limited by its retrospective and observational nature, potential coding errors, and the lack of intraoperative factors, such as operative time, laboratory measures, and information on surgeons' experience. CONCLUSIONS In the United States, in patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older who were undergoing tumor resections, compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery is associated with better inpatient outcomes in terms of complication rate and risk of prolonged length of stay. This finding is especially true among patients with colon cancer. However, robotic surgery is associated with higher total hospital costs. See Video Abstract . RESULTADOS DE LA CIRUGA ASISTIDA POR ROBOT FRENTE A LA CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ADULTOS AOS DE EDAD UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN DE LA MUESTRA NACIONAL DE PACIENTES HOSPITALIZADOS DE ESTADOS UNIDOS ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía asistida por robot se ha adoptado cada vez más en la resección del cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los resultados hospitalarios de la resección del cáncer colorrectal asistida por robot versus la laparoscópica convencional en pacientes ≥ 75 años.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de base poblacional.AJUSTES:Este estudio analizó datos de la Muestra Nacional de Pacientes Hospitalizados de Estados Unidos de 2005 a 2018.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años y sometidos a resección laparoscópica convencional o asistida por robot.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron las complicaciones posoperatorias, la duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria y los costos hospitalarios totales.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron datos de 14.108 pacientes. Después del ajuste, cualquier complicación posoperatoria (aOR = 0,87; IC del 95 %: 0,77-0,99, p = 0,030) y duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria (aOR = 0,78; IC del 95 %: 0,67-0,91, p = 0,001) fueron significativamente menores en el grupo robótico que el grupo laparoscópico. Además, la cirugía robótica se asoció con costos hospitalarios totales significativamente mayores ($26,06 USD mayor costo; IC 95%: 21,35-30,77 USD, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:El análisis estuvo limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva y observacional, posibles errores de codificación y la falta de factores intraoperatorios como el tiempo operatorio, medidas de laboratorio e información sobre la experiencia de los cirujanos.CONCLUSIONES:En Estados Unidos, los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años que se sometieron a resecciones tumorales, en comparación con la cirugía laparoscópica convencional, la cirugía robótica se asocia con mejores resultados hospitalarios en términos de tasa de complicaciones y riesgo de estadía prolongada, especialmente entre pacientes con cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica se asocia a costes hospitalarios totales más elevados. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Chih Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuen-Lin Wu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Li Su
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kung-Chuan Cheng
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-En Tang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Chiao Song
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Hwa Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ko-Chao Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brar G, Xu S, Anwar M, Talajia K, Ramesh N, Arshad SR. Robotic surgery: public perceptions and current misconceptions. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:84. [PMID: 38386115 PMCID: PMC10884196 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01837-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Whilst surgeons and robotic companies are key stakeholders involved in the adoption of robotic assisted surgery (RS), the public's role is overlooked. However, given that patients hold ultimate power over their healthcare decisions, public acceptance of RS is crucial. Therefore, this study aims to identify public understanding, opinions, and misconceptions about RS. An online questionnaire distributed between February and May 2021 ascertained the views of UK adults on RS. The themes of questions included familiarity, experience and comfort with RS, opinions on its ethical implications, and the impact of factual information provided to the participant. The data were evaluated using thematic and statistical analysis, including assessing for statistical differences in age, gender, education level, and presence in the medical field. Overall, 216 responses were analysed. Participants were relatively uninformed about RS, with a median knowledge score of 4.00(2.00-6.00) on a 10-point Likert scale. Fears surrounding increased risk, reduced precision and technological failure were identified, alongside misconceptions about its autonomous nature. However, providing factual information in the survey about RS statistically increased participant comfort (p = < 0.0001). Most (61.8%) participants believed robot manufacturers were responsible for malfunctions, but doctors were held accountable more by older, less educated, and non-medical participants. Our findings suggest that there is limited public understanding of RS. The numerous common misconceptions identified present a major barrier to the widespread acceptance of RS, since inaccurate fears about its nature could discourage potential patients from engaging with robotic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurneet Brar
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England.
| | - Siyang Xu
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England
| | - Mehreen Anwar
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England
- University of Manchester School of Medicine, Manchester, England
| | - Kareena Talajia
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England
| | - Nikilesh Ramesh
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England
| | - Serish R Arshad
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, Sir Alexander Fleming, Imperial College Road, SW7 2AZ, London, England
- Calderdale Royal Hospital, Salterhebble, Halifax, West Yorkshire, England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rein LKL, Dohrn N, Gögenur I, Falk Klein M. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2366-2377. [PMID: 37919465 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM The use of robot-assisted surgery for left-sided colon cancer is increasing in Denmark; however, it is yet to be established if the robotic approach results in improved clinical outcomes compared with the corresponding laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted surgery with laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer at a national level. METHOD The study is a nationwide database study based on data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database. Patients from all colorectal centres in Denmark treated with surgery with curative intent in an elective setting with either robotic or laparoscopic left colectomy or sigmoidectomy during the period 2014-2019 were included. To adjust for confounding, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and the groups were compared for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, performance score, year of diagnosis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, left colectomy or sigmoidectomy, tumour localization, use of stoma or stenting and pathological T (pT) category. RESULTS A total of 5532 patients were available for analysis, and after PSM in a ratio of 2:1, 1392 laparoscopic and 696 robotic cases were identified. After matching we found a lower conversion rate and a higher lymph node yield in the robotic group compared with the laparoscopic group (5.8% vs. 11%, p < 0.001 and 27 vs. 24, p < 0.001, respectively). Further, we found a higher proportion of patients with a lymph node yield of 12 or more in the robotic group (97% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.02). Plane of dissection, radicality and pathological disease stages did not differ between the two groups. We found no difference in either overall surgical (13% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.23) or medical (5.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.49) postoperative complications and no difference in 30-day (p = 0.369) or 90-day mortality (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted surgery for left-sided colon cancer was associated with a significantly lower conversion rate and a significantly higher lymph node yield than the laparoscopic approach. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar in the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niclas Dohrn
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Mads Falk Klein
- Department of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alves Martins BA, Filho ODM, Ghezzi TL, Melani AGF, Romagnolo LGC, Moreira Júnior H, de Almeida JPP, Araújo SEA, de Sousa JB, de Almeida RM. An Overview of Robotic Colorectal Surgery Adoption and Training in Brazil. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1675. [PMID: 37763794 PMCID: PMC10535775 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Robotic surgical systems have rapidly become integrated into colorectal surgery practice in recent years, particularly for rectal resections, where the advantages of robotic platforms over conventional laparoscopy are more pronounced. However, as with any technological advancement, the initial high costs can be a limiting factor, leading to unequal health service access, especially in middle- and lower-income countries. Materials and Method: A narrative review was conducted with the objective of providing an overview of the escalating adoption, current training programmes, and certification process of robotic colorectal surgery in Brazil. Results: Brazil has witnessed a rapid increase in robotic platforms in recent years. Currently, there are 106 robotic systems installed nationwide. However, approximately 60% of the medical facilities which adopted robotic platforms are in the Southeast region, which is both the most populous and economically prosperous in the country. The Brazilian Society of Coloproctology recently established clear rules for the training programme and certification of colorectal surgeons in robotic surgery. The key components of the training encompass theoretical content, virtual robotic simulation, observation, assistance, and supervised procedures in colorectal surgery. Although the training parameters are well established, no colorectal surgery residency programme in Brazil has yet integrated the teaching and training of robotic surgery into its curriculum. Thus far, the training process has been led by private institutions and the industry. Conclusion: Despite the fast spread of robotic platforms across Brazil, several challenges still need to be addressed to democratise training and promote the widespread use of these platforms. It is crucial to tackle these obstacles to achieve greater integration of robotic technology in colorectal surgery throughout the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oswaldo de Moraes Filho
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Brasilia 70840-901, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Hélio Moreira Júnior
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, School of Medicine, Federal University of Goias, Goias 74605-050, Brazil
| | | | | | - João Batista de Sousa
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Brasilia 70840-901, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tian Y, Xiong D, Xu M, Fan Q, Zheng H, Shen H, Huang B, Wang L, Li C, Zhang A, Liu B, Li F, Gao F, Tong W. Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision: a retrospective multicenter study with propensity score matching. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1187476. [PMID: 37333806 PMCID: PMC10273266 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1187476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective During the past decade, the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been developed in an attempt to minimize recurrence for right-sided colon cancer. This study aims to compare outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME for right-sided colon cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter propensity score matching study. From July 2016 to July 2021, 382 consecutive patients from different Chinese surgical departments were available for inclusion out of an initial cohort of 412, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME. Data of all patients were retrospectively collected and reviewed. Of these, 149 cases were performed by a robotic approach, while the other 233 cases were done by laparoscopy. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare perioperative, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes between the robotic and the laparoscopic groups (n = 142). Results Before propensity score matching, there were no statistical differences regarding the sex, history of abdominal surgery, body mass index (BMI), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, tumor location, and center between groups (p > 0.05), while a significant difference was observed regarding age (p = 0.029). After matching, two comparable groups of 142 cases were obtained with equivalent patient characteristics (p > 0.05). Blood loss, time to oral intake, return of bowel function, length of stay, and complications were not different between groups (p > 0.05). The robotic group showed a significantly lower conversion rate (0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.03), but a longer operative time (200.9 min vs. 182.3 min, p < 0.001) and a higher total hospital cost (85,016 RMB vs. 58,266 RMB, p < 0.001) compared with the laparoscopic group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was comparable (20.4 vs. 20.5, p = 0.861). Incidence of complications, mortality, and pathologic outcomes were similar between groups (p > 0.05). The 2-year disease-free survival rates were 84.9% and 87.1% (p = 0.679), and the overall survival rates between groups were 83.8% and 80.7% (p = 0.943). Conclusion Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis, the outcomes of robotic right hemicolectomy with CME were comparable to the laparoscopic procedures with fewer conversions to open surgery. More clinical advantages of the robotic surgery system need to be further confirmed by well-conducted randomized clinical trials with large cohorts of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Dehai Xiong
- Department of Colorectum, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Ming Xu
- Department of Colorectum, The 940Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qi Fan
- Department of Colorectum, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Huichao Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Haode Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bin Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chunxue Li
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Anping Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Baohua Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fan Li
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Colorectum, The 940Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou, China
| | - Weidong Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Colorectal Division, Army Medical Center, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ravendran K, Abiola E, Balagumar K, Raja AZ, Flaih M, Vaja SP, Muhidin AO, Madouros N. A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery. Cureus 2023; 15:e37337. [PMID: 37182014 PMCID: PMC10169093 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal surgery is a treatment for colorectal lesions. Technological advancements have given the rise to robotic colorectal surgery, a procedure that limits excessive blood loss via 3D pin-point precision capabilities during surgeries. The aim of this study is to review robotic surgery in colorectal treatment procedures in order to dictate its ultimate merits. This is a literature review utilising PubMed and Google Scholar; it only includes case studies and case reviews related to robotic colorectal surgeries. Literature reviews are excluded. We incorporated abstracts from all articles and full publications were examined to compare the benefits of robotic surgery in colorectal treatments. The number of articles reviewed was 41 literature spanning from 2003 to 2022. We found that robotic surgeries yielded finer marginal resections, greater amounts of lymph node resections and earlier recovery of bowel functions. The patients also spent less time in hospital after surgery. The obstacles on the other hand are it costs longer operative hours and further training, which is expensive. Studies show robotic approach is a choice for treating rectal cancer. However further studies would be needed to conclude the best approach. This is especially true with patients treated for anterior colorectal resections. Based on the evidence it's safe to say that the upsides outweigh the downsides, but advancements and further research in robotic colorectal surgeries are still necessary to reduce operative hours and cost. Surgical societies should also take the initiative and set up effective training programmes for colorectal robotic surgeries, as trained physicians result in better treatment outcomes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin Z, Li Y, Wu J, Zheng H, Yang C. Nomogram for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal resection. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1273. [PMID: 36474177 PMCID: PMC9724353 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10377-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a major complication in patients undergoing colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors contributing to PPOI, and to develop an effective nomogram to determine the risks of this population. METHODS A total of 1,254 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical colorectal resection at Fujian Cancer Hospital from March 2016 to August 2021 were enrolled as a training cohort in this study. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the correlation between PPOI and clinicopathological characteristics. A nomogram predicting the incidence of PPOI was constructed. The cohort of 153 patients from Fujian Provincial Hospital were enrolled as a validation cohort. Internal and external validations were used to evaluate the prediction ability by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a calibration plot. RESULTS In the training cohort, 128 patients (10.2%) had PPOI after colorectal resection. The independent predictive factors of PPOI were identified, and included gender, age, surgical approach and intraoperative fluid overload. The AUC of nomogram were 0.779 (95% CI: 0.736-0.822) and 0.791 (95%CI: 0.677-0.905) in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The two cohorts of calibration plots showed a good consistency between nomogram prediction and actual observation. CONCLUSIONS A highly accurate nomogram was developed and validated in this study, which can be used to provide individual prediction of PPOI in patients after colorectal resection, and this predictive power can potentially assist surgeons to make the optimal treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenmeng Lin
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Yangming Li
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Jiansheng Wu
- grid.415108.90000 0004 1757 9178Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001 Fujian Province China
| | - Huizhe Zheng
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| | - Chunkang Yang
- grid.415110.00000 0004 0605 1140Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014 Fujian Province China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Birrer DL, Frehner M, Kitow J, Zoetzl KM, Rickenbacher A, Biedermann L, Turina M. Combining staged laparoscopic colectomy with robotic completion proctectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis for improved clinical and cosmetic outcomes: a single-center feasibility study and technical description. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:877-884. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01466-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractRobotic proctectomy has been shown to lead to better functional outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. However, in ulcerative colitis (UC), the potential value of robotic proctectomy has not yet been investigated, and in this indication, the operation needs to be adjusted to the total colectomy typically performed in the preceding 6 months. In this study, we describe the technique and analyze outcomes of a staged laparoscopic and robotic three-stage restorative proctocolectomy and compare the clinical outcome with the classical laparoscopic procedure. Between December 2016 and May 2021, 17 patients underwent robotic completion proctectomy (CP) with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for UC. These patients were compared to 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic CP and IPAA, following laparoscopic total colectomy with end ileostomy 6 months prior by the same surgical team at our tertiary referral center. 27 patients underwent a 3-stage procedure for refractory UC (10 in the lap. group vs. 17 in the robot group). Return to normal bowel function and morbidity were comparable between the two groups. Median length of hospital stay was the same for the robotic proctectomy/IPAA group with 7 days [median; IQR (6–10)], compared to the laparoscopic stage II with 7.5 days [median; IQR (6.25–8)]. Median time to soft diet was 2 days [IQR (1–3)] vs. 3 days in the lap group [IQR 3 (3–4)]. Two patients suffered from a major complication (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3a) in the first 90 postoperative days in the robotic group vs. one in the laparoscopic group. Perception of cosmetic results were favorable with 100% of patients reporting to be highly satisfied or satisfied in the robotic group. This report demonstrates the feasibility of a combined laparoscopic and robotic staged restorative proctocolectomy for UC, when compared with the traditional approach. Robotic pelvic dissection and a revised trocar placement in staged proctocolectomy with synergistic use of both surgical techniques with their individual advantages will likely improve overall long-term functional results, including an improved cosmetic outcome.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jung WB. Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2022. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii220009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Won Beom Jung
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aziz H, Khan M, Khan S, Serra GP, Goodman MD, Genyk Y, Sheikh MR. Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time? J Robot Surg 2021; 16:687-694. [PMID: 34398365 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01296-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Aziz
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muhammad Khan
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Sara Khan
- Department of Surgery, St. David's Health Care System, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | | | - Martin D Goodman
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuri Genyk
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Mohd Raashid Sheikh
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu M, Zhao Z, Jia B, Liu R, Liu H. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy for left-sided colon cancers: a retrospective study. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1049-1056. [PMID: 33394355 PMCID: PMC8184556 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00959-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted hemicolectomy (RAH) versus laparoscopy-assisted hemicolectomy (LAH) for left-sided colon cancers. Patients who underwent RAH and LAH from January 2012 to December 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Follow-up consultations were conducted to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these procedures. A total of 460 patients were included (RAH, n = 205; LAH, n = 255). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the two groups. Compared with the LAH group, the RAH group showed longer operative time (150.23 ± 43.77 min vs. 125.85 ± 38.67 min, p < 0.001) and higher surgery cost (6.33 ± 1.50 vs. 2.88 ± 0.72 thousand $, p < 0.001) and total hospital cost (14.97 ± 3.05 vs. 9.05 ± 2.31 thousand $, p < 0.001). No significant differences in tumor pathology, TNM staging, and perioperative outcomes were observed. There were no obvious differences in the 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) or 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival. Cox multivariate analyses showed that age, body mass index, and intravascular cancer embolus were independent risk factors for OS. Moreover, the robotic approach was not an independent risk factor for prognosis of left-sided colon cancers. RAH is an appropriate operation method for left-sided colon cancer, with perioperative and long-term outcomes comparable to those of laparoscopy. Meanwhile, RHA has longer operative time and higher cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maolin Xu
- Department of General Surgery II, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery II, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Baoqing Jia
- Department of General Surgery II, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery II, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| | - Hongyi Liu
- Department of General Surgery II, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seufferlein T, Weitz J. Novel Concepts in the Management of Colorectal Cancer. Visc Med 2019; 35:245. [PMID: 31602386 PMCID: PMC6738180 DOI: 10.1159/000501750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|