1
|
Yilmaz MT, Sari SY, Zorlu F, Yazici G. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:932-951. [PMID: 38869695 PMCID: PMC11236855 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01212-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults. With the evidence demonstrating that episcleral plaque brachytherapy (EPB) has similar survival rates as enucleation in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS), eye-sparing treatments have come to the fore today. External radiotherapy techniques (proton beam radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery/fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) are an important treatment option for globe-sparing treatments. There are no prospective randomized trials comparing these techniques; however, retrospective series, meta-analyses, and reviews indicate that these EPB and external radiotherapy techniques are equal. With this review, we aimed to examine the external radiotherapy techniques used in the treatment of uveal melanoma in detail with reference to the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mularska W, Chicheł A, Rospond-Kubiak I. Radiation retinopathy following episcleral brachytherapy for intraocular tumors: Current treatment options. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2023; 15:372-382. [PMID: 38026080 PMCID: PMC10669920 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.132398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation retinopathy (RR) and radiation maculopathy (RM) can occur as a result of uveal melanoma radiation treatment and after irradiation of other head and neck extraocular tumors, even with precise targeting techniques, such as stereotactic or proton beam radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of potential radiation damage to ocular tissues, and how recent developments in ophthalmic multimodal imaging techniques and treatment modalities have improved managing options. Several treatment strategies have been employed so far for the management of RR, including laser photocoagulation, intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents or glucocorticosteroids and surgery. The use of intravitreal anti-VEGFs or dexamethasone implants have significantly altered the final visual outcome for uveal melanoma patients. As a prophylaxis, a few different strategies were proposed, but still there is a lack of large randomized clinical trials supporting these approaches and clear clinical guidelines for daily practice. Early detection and proper treatment are crucial in preventing or reducing vision loss, and improving patients' quality of life. Close monitoring and timely intervention are essential for successful management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weronika Mularska
- Department of Ophthalmology, Poznan´ University of Medical Sciences, Poznan´, Poland
| | - Adam Chicheł
- Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan´, Poland
| | - Iwona Rospond-Kubiak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Poznan´ University of Medical Sciences, Poznan´, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banou L, Tsani Z, Arvanitogiannis K, Pavlaki M, Dastiridou A, Androudi S. Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma: A Review of Ocular Complications. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6374-6396. [PMID: 37504330 PMCID: PMC10378371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma represents the most prevalent form of primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Historically, enucleation was considered the gold-standard approach in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Currently, radiotherapy is the most commonly used therapy, aiming at a better quality of life. However, radiotherapy can result in several ocular complications, some of which may be vision-threatening. Radiation-induced dry eye, scleral necrosis, cataract, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, radiation retinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy are the most common complications. This article aims to summarize the current literature regarding the ocular complications after radiotherapy, as well as their clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies. A thorough understanding of these issues is crucial for ophthalmologists and oncologists to provide optimal patient care, improve visual outcomes, and minimize long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lamprini Banou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Zoi Tsani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Maria Pavlaki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Anna Dastiridou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Sofia Androudi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazzini C, Vicini G, Di Leo L, Massi D, Rizzo S, Giansanti F. Anatomical and Functional Outcomes after Endoresection and Adjuvant Ruthenium Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:902. [PMID: 37109431 PMCID: PMC10146230 DOI: 10.3390/life13040902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of endoresection and adjuvant ruthenium (Ru)-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS Retrospective case series of 15 UM patients (15 eyes) treated at our center (Careggi University Hospital, Florence). RESULTS Six patients (40%) were male and nine were female (60%). The mean age of patients at the time of treatment was 61.6 years (±19.41). The mean BCVA at baseline was 20/50. In all cases UM originated from the choroid. The mean tumor thickness at baseline was 7.14 mm (±2.05), and the mean largest basal diameter was 11.2 mm (±1.92). A concurrent retinal detachment was diagnosed in 11 patients (73.3%). Two patients (13.3%) showed vitreous seeding at baseline. Eleven patients (73.3%) were treated with primary endoresection, while four patients (26.7%) were treated with a "salvage endoresection" after primary treatment failure (previous radiation treatment). The mean follow-up time was 28.9 months (±10.6). Thirteen out of fifteen patients were alive and showed no evidence of local recurrence or distance metastasis at the last follow-up visit. The treatment achieved local control of the disease in 14 out of 15 cases (93.3%). In one case, the patient underwent enucleation for disease recurrence. The overall survival rate at the end of the follow-up was 93.3%. The mean BCVA at last follow-up visit was 20/40. Treatment was well tolerated, without significant complications. CONCLUSIONS Endoresection and adjuvant Ru-106 brachytherapy is a valuable conservative option for selected UM patients and can be used both as a primary treatment and as a salvage therapy. It can control melanoma and avoid enucleation, reduce radiation-related complications, and provide tumor tissue for chromosomal analysis and prognostic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Mazzini
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Vicini
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Di Leo
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Massi
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Stanislao Rizzo
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Giansanti
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liegl R, Schmelter V, Fuerweger C, Ehret F, Priglinger S, Muacevic A, Foerster P. Robotic CyberKnife Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 250:177-185. [PMID: 36642391 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the results of robotic-assisted radiosurgery in choroidal and ciliary body melanomas treated at the Department of Ophthalmology of Ludwig-Maximilians-University and the European CyberKnife Center in Munich, Germany. DESIGN Interventional case series METHODS: This retrospective study included 594 consecutive patients referred to our clinic for the treatment of choroidal and ciliary body melanomas with robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife) from 2005 to 2019. Eye retention, local control and disease-specific survival rates were calculated as Kaplan-Meier and actuarial estimates. The impact of prescription dose, tumor size, and ciliary body involvement was assessed by likelihood ratio tests and Cox regression. RESULTS Among all patients who were staged according to the TNM classification system (8th edition), 22.7% were I, 57.9% were II, 18.9% were III, and 0.5% were IV. Median apical tumor height and base diameter were 5.8 and 11.4 mm. The mean follow-up was 41.7 months. Local control after 3 and 5 years was 92.0% (95% CI = 88.2%-94.7%) and 84.3% (95% CI = 77.9%-89.0%), respectively, for 21 to 22 Gy and 86.9% (95% CI = 79.7%-91.7%) and 77.7% (95% CI = 68.5%-84.6%), respectively, when treated with 20 Gy or less. Eye retention was achieved in 89.9% and 81.0% after 3 and 5 years with 21 to 22 Gy and 85.9% and 80.0% for 20 Gy or less. Disease-specific survival rates were 93.1% (95% CI = 90.2%-95.2%) after 3 years, 89.8% (95% CI = 86.0%-92.6%) after 5 years, and 87.8% (95% CI = 82.8%-91.4%) after 7 years. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of patients treated for choroidal and ciliary body melanomas with CyberKnife. Our results reflect an improvement in the outcome of CyberKnife therapy for patients with choroidal and ciliary body melanoma treated with single-session radiosurgery in the last decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffael Liegl
- From the Department of Ophthalmology (R.L., V.S., S.P., P.F.), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Valerie Schmelter
- From the Department of Ophthalmology (R.L., V.S., S.P., P.F.), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Fuerweger
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich (C.F., F.E., A.M.), Munich, Germany; Center for Neurosurgery (C.F.), Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich (C.F., F.E., A.M.), Munich, Germany
| | - Siegfried Priglinger
- From the Department of Ophthalmology (R.L., V.S., S.P., P.F.), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Paul Foerster
- From the Department of Ophthalmology (R.L., V.S., S.P., P.F.), Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zemba M, Dumitrescu OM, Gheorghe AG, Radu M, Ionescu MA, Vatafu A, Dinu V. Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:333. [PMID: 36672282 PMCID: PMC9856287 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihail Zemba
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alina Gabriela Gheorghe
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Bucharest Emergency Eye Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Radu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Alexandru Ionescu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Vatafu
- Department of Ophthalmology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Valentin Dinu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Bucharest Emergency Eye Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yazici G, Kiratli H, Ozyigit G, Sari SY, Elmali A, Yilmaz MT, Koc I, Deliktas O, Gumeler E, Cengiz M, Zorlu F. Every other day stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma decreases toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:39-45. [PMID: 36184996 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report the long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS/FSRT) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the results of patients treated between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), enucleation-free survival (EFS) and treatment toxicity. RESULTS 443 patients with 445 UMs were treated via CyberKnife®. According to the COMS classification, 70% of the tumors were small/medium and 30% were large. Median total RT dose was 54 Gy, median BED10 was 151 Gy. After a median 74-months follow-up, SRS/FSRT yielded an 83% overall LC rate. The 5- and 10-year LRFS rate was 74% and 56%, respectively. Patient age and the COMS size were prognostic for all survival endpoints. An increased SRS/FSRT dose was associated with higher LRFS and EFS rates. SRS/FSRT-related toxicity was observed in 49% of the eyes. Median visual acuity (VA) significantly deteriorated after SRS/FSRT in 76% of the treated eyes. The overall eye preservation rate was 62%, and the 5- and 10-year EFS rate was 64% and 36%, respectively. The delivery of FSRT every other day resulted in a significantly lower rate of toxicity and enucleation compared to FSRT on consecutive days. CONCLUSION A total dose of ≥45 Gy and BED10Gy ≥ 112.5 SRS/FSRT is associated with a higher LC rate in patients with UM. Despite the favorable outcomes, treatment toxicity is the major limitation of this treatment. Toxicity and enucleation can be minimized by treating the eye every other day.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gozde Yazici
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hayyam Kiratli
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aysenur Elmali
- Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Koc
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozge Deliktas
- Tunceli State Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Tunceli, Turkey
| | - Ekim Gumeler
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dosimetric analysis of intraocular hemorrhage in nonsquamous head and neck cancers treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:143-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Cicinelli MV, Di Nicola M, Gigliotti CR, Battista M, Miserocchi E, Vecchio A, Mortini P, Bandello F, Modorati GM. Predictive factors of radio-induced complications in 194 eyes undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2021; 99:e1458-e1466. [PMID: 33638277 DOI: 10.1111/aos.14814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report the factors predictive of radio-induced complications (i.e. radiation retinopathy [RR], radiation papillopathy [RP] and neovascular glaucoma [NVG]) in uveal melanoma (UM) patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR). MATERIALS AND METHODS Longitudinal cohort study on patients with UM treated at the Ocular Oncology Service, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, between June 1994 and November 2018. Data were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of GKR-related complications were reported. Variables associated with each complication were investigated using multivariable Cox models and confirmed by logistic regression analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported for significant associations. RESULTS One hundred ninety-four patients (99 males, 51%) were included, and 184 tumours were primarily located in the choroid (95%). Median follow-up was 57 months (range 6-286). Local control was achieved in 182 eyes (94%), and 152 eyes (78%) experienced at least one radiation-induced complication. Radiation retinopathy was documented in 67 eyes (35%) after a median of 23 months. Older age (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99, p = 0.02) had a protective effect for RR. Radiation papillopathy was diagnosed in 35 eyes (18%) after a median of 14 months after GKR. Macular or peripapillary location (HR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.52-6.16, p = 0.002) was associated with increased risk of RP, while older age was protective (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98, p = 0.001). New-onset NVG was found in 53 eyes (27%), and median onset was 28 months. Tumour thickness (HR = 4.41, 95% CI = 2.23-8.72, p < 0.001) and peripapillary location (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.46-5.27, p = 0.002) were the main risk factors associated with NVG. CONCLUSION Understanding factors predictive for radiation-related complications in patients undergoing GKR might help for better counselling and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vittoria Cicinelli
- School of Medicine Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
- Department of Ophthalmology IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
| | - Maura Di Nicola
- Ocular Oncology Service University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati OH USA
| | | | - Marco Battista
- Department of Ophthalmology IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
| | | | - Antonella Vecchio
- Department of Medical Physics IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
| | - Pietro Mortini
- School of Medicine Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
| | - Francesco Bandello
- School of Medicine Vita‐Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy
- Department of Ophthalmology IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guleser UY, Sarici AM, Ucar D, Gonen B, Sengul Samanci N, Özgüroğlu M. Comparison of iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery treatment outcomes for uveal melanoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 260:1337-1343. [PMID: 34735632 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05472-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacies of iodine-125 brachytherapy (IBT) and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKRS) in the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma. METHODS The demographic data and tumor characteristics at diagnosis of 201 patients treated with IBT and 52 patients treated with GKRS were recorded. The two treatments were then compared in terms of complications, local control, eye retention, metastasis, and overall survival rate. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 56 months for the GKRS group and 45 months for the IBT group (p = 0.167). There were no significant differences in demographic data or tumor characteristics between the groups at diagnosis. Radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, and neovascular glaucoma occurred at similar rates in both groups. However, radiation maculopathy and cataracts occurred more frequently in the GKRS group. The number of cases that have developed vision loss (worsening of best-corrected visual acuity on three or more lines on the Snellen chart) was significantly higher in the GKRS group (60%) compared to the IBT group (44%) (p = 0.048). Local control, metastasis, and 5-year overall survival rates were statistically similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS GKRS can be preferred as an eye-sparing treatment option for posterior uveal melanoma in cases where brachytherapy cannot be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmet Murat Sarici
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul Unıversity - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, 34098, Turkey.
| | - Didar Ucar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul Unıversity - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, 34098, Turkey
| | - Busenur Gonen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Ataturk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Nilay Sengul Samanci
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Özgüroğlu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Beek JGM, van Rij CM, Baart SJ, Yavuzyigitoglu S, Bergmann MJ, Paridaens D, Naus NC, Kiliç E. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: Long-term outcome and control rates. Acta Ophthalmol 2021; 100:511-519. [PMID: 34529346 PMCID: PMC9544756 DOI: 10.1111/aos.15029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of our study is to evaluate local tumour control rates, radiation side‐effects, visual preservation and disease‐free survival (DFS) of uveal melanoma (UM) patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT). Methods A retrospective study of UM patients, who were treated with fSRT (N = 189), was performed by the Rotterdam Ocular Melanoma Study group (ROMS), the Netherlands, between 1999 and 2014 with a follow‐up of at least 5 years. Results The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐, 10‐ and 15‐year local tumour control rates were as follows: 99.4%, 92.8%, 92.2%, 89.3% and 89.3%, respectively. Cataract (67.8%) was the most common side‐effect of fSRT followed by retinopathy (35.1%), maculopathy (23.8%), vitreous haemorrhage (20.1%), neovascular glaucoma (NVG) (20.0%) and optic neuropathy (12.4%). Patients with anterior located UMs developed cataract more frequently (p = 0.047, multivariable analysis). By multivariable analysis, significant factors for secondary enucleation were tumour recurrence (p < 0.001) and NVG (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, risk factors for a worse DFS were larger UM (p = 0.024) and tumours with subretinal fluid (SRF) at baseline (p = 0.038). The 5‐year DFS was 77.0% and the best corrected visual acuity decreased significantly after treatment. After 5 years, 22.0% of patients and after 10 years 17.6% of patients had a visual acuity of ≤0.3 logMAR. Conclusion Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a good treatment option for small‐, medium‐ and large‐sized tumours with 5‐year local tumour control of 92.2%. After 5 years, 22.0% of the patients had a good vision. Independently of tumour location, the visual acuity decreased significantly after treatment. Overall, the 5‐year DFS was 77.0%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackelien G. M. van Beek
- Department of Ophthalmology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Ophthalmology Ikazia Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
- ‘Oog op Zuid’ Eye Clinic Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M. van Rij
- Department of Radiotherapy Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Sara J. Baart
- Department of Biostatistics Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu
- Department of Ophthalmology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Michael J. Bergmann
- Department of Ophthalmology Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht The Netherlands
| | - Dion Paridaens
- Department of Ophthalmology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Oculoplastic and Orbital surgery Rotterdam Eye Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C. Naus
- Department of Ophthalmology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Emine Kiliç
- Department of Ophthalmology Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical outcomes and secondary glaucoma after gamma-knife radiosurgery and Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: a single institution experience. Melanoma Res 2021; 31:38-48. [PMID: 32826711 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed data from records of 48 patients (48 eyes) treated with gamma-knife (n = 18) or Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy (n = 30) for uveal melanoma, in our Ocular Oncology Unit between December 2013 and September 2019, with the aim to evaluate treatment outcomes, and incidence and risk factors for secondary glaucoma. Patients demographics and tumor characteristics at diagnosis were recorded. Follow-up data were collected regarding local tumor control, treatment complications, enucleation need, metastases occurrence and survival status. The median follow-up period was 33.7 months in the gamma-knife group and 26.2 months in the brachytherapy group. The mean tumor thickness, the largest basal diameter and the tumor volume were significantly higher in the gamma-knife group than in the brachytherapy group. The local tumor control rate was 100% in the brachytherapy group and 77.8% in the gamma-knife group. In the gamma-knife group, six patients were enucleated, no patient treated with brachytherapy underwent enucleation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% in the brachytherapy group and 94.44% in the gamma-knife group. Secondary glaucoma occurred in 10 patients after gamma-knife and in one patient after brachytherapy: it should be emphasized that larger lesions were treated with gamma-knife, whereas smaller tumors were selected for brachytherapy. We found a significative correlation of tumor thickness (P value = 0.043) and volume (P value = 0.040) with secondary glaucoma occurrence after gamma-knife treatment. Moreover, secondary glaucoma significantly correlated with radiation retinopathy in the gamma-knife group (P value = 0.009). This study shows preliminary clinical results that could be useful for further studies with more patients and longer follow-up.
Collapse
|
13
|
Foti PV, Travali M, Farina R, Palmucci S, Spatola C, Liardo RLE, Milazzotto R, Raffaele L, Salamone V, Caltabiano R, Broggi G, Puzzo L, Russo A, Reibaldi M, Longo A, Vigneri P, Avitabile T, Ettorre GC, Basile A. Diagnostic methods and therapeutic options of uveal melanoma with emphasis on MR imaging-Part II: treatment indications and complications. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:67. [PMID: 34085131 PMCID: PMC8175681 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01001-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapy of uveal melanoma aims to preserve the eye and its function and to avoid metastatic dissemination. The treatment choice is difficult and must keep into account several factors; the therapeutic strategy of uveal melanoma should therefore be personalized, sometimes requiring to combine different treatment techniques. Nowadays globe-sparing radiotherapy techniques are often preferred to enucleation. Plaque brachytherapy, the most commonly used eye-preserving therapy, is suitable for small- and medium-sized uveal melanomas. Proton beam radiotherapy is indicated for tumours with noticeable size, challenging shape and location, but is more expensive and less available than brachytherapy. Enucleation is currently restricted to advanced tumours, uveal melanomas with orbital or optic nerve involvement, blind and painful eyes because of treatment-related complications (neovascular glaucoma, chronic inflammatory processes). The effect of proton beam therapy on neoplastic tissue is related to direct cytotoxic action of the radiations, impairment of neoplastic vascular supply and immunologic response. Complications after radiotherapy are frequent and numerous and mainly related to tumour thickness, radiation dose and distance between the tumour and optic nerve. The purpose of this pictorial review is to provide the radiologists with awareness about diagnostic methods and therapeutic options of uveal melanoma. In the present second section, we discuss the therapeutic management of uveal melanoma, describing the main ocular-conserving radiotherapic techniques. We subsequently present an overview of the effects of radiations on neoplastic tissue. Lastly, we review ocular complications following radiotherapy that should be evaluated by radiologists during follow-up MRI examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Valerio Foti
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy.
| | - Mario Travali
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Renato Farina
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Stefano Palmucci
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Corrado Spatola
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Rocco Luca Emanuele Liardo
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Roberto Milazzotto
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Luigi Raffaele
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Salamone
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Rosario Caltabiano
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Broggi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Lidia Puzzo
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Russo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Longo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Paolo Vigneri
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Teresio Avitabile
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovani Carlo Ettorre
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Basile
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia" - Radiology I Unit, University Hospital Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", Via Santa Sofia, 78 - 95123, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reichstein DA, Brock AL. Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2021; 32:183-190. [PMID: 33770014 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radiation therapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanoma. We intend to outline the current radiation therapy methods that are employed to treat uveal melanoma. We will outline their relative benefits over one another. We will also provide some background about radiation therapy in general to accustom the ophthalmologists likely reading this review. RECENT FINDINGS Four main options exist for radiation therapy of uveal melanoma. Because the eye is a small space, and because melanomas are relatively radioresistant, oncologists treating uveal melanoma must deliver highly focused doses in high amounts to a small space. Therapies incorporating external beams include proton beam therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery comes in two forms, gamma knife therapy and cyberknife therapy. Radiation may also be placed directly on the eye surgically via plaque brachytherapy. All methods have been used effectively to treat uveal melanoma. SUMMARY Each particular radiotherapy technique employed to treat uveal melanoma has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The ocular oncologist can choose amongst these therapies based upon his or her clinical judgment of the relative risks and benefits. Availability of the therapy and cost to the patient remain significant factors in the ocular oncologist's choice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee WJ, Cho KR, Choi JW, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Kim YD, Woo KI, Lee JI. Stereotactic radiosurgery for orbital cavernous venous malformation: a single center's experience for 15 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:357-364. [PMID: 32929542 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04575-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery such as Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been shown to have a good treatment effect for orbital cavernous venous malformation (CVM). However, radiation-induced retinopathy or optic neuropathy is a vision-threatening complication of orbital irradiation. Predicting the post-treatment visual outcome is critical. METHODS Clinical and radiological outcomes were investigated in 30 patients who underwent GKRS for orbital CVM between July 2005 and February 2020. Measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) was obtained in 14 patients. RESULTS The median clinical and radiological follow-up periods were 46.6 months (range, 15.9-105.8) and 27.5 months (range, 15.4-105.8), respectively. Twenty-eight patients underwent multisession (4 fractions) GKRS. The median cumulative marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 16-24). Two patients underwent single-session GKRS. Marginal doses were 15 Gy and 10.5 Gy in each patient. The volume of CVM decreased in 29 (97%) patients. Visual acuity was improved in 6 (20%) patients and was stable in 22 (73%) patients. Visual field defect and exophthalmos were improved in all patients. Serial investigation of OCT showed no statistically significant difference in pRNFL thickness after GKRS. Patients with normal average pRNFL thickness showed better visual recovery than patients with thin average pRNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS GKRS is an effective and safe treatment option for orbital CVM. The pRNFL thickness before GKRS can be a prognostic indicator for visual recovery in orbital CVM after GKRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Jae Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Rae Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jung-Won Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Doo-Sik Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Ho Jun Seol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Do-Hyun Nam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Yoon-Duck Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung In Woo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung-Il Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Parker T, Rigney G, Kallos J, Stefko ST, Kano H, Niranjan A, Green AL, Aziz T, Rath P, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1526-1536. [PMID: 33152286 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30459-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamma knife radiosurgery is regarded as the gold-standard stereotactic radiosurgery modality for the treatment of intracranial tumours, and its use has been expanded for the treatment of intraocular malignancies. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy, outcomes, and complications of gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanomas and metastases. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to aggregate the clinical outcomes of patients with uveal melanomas or intraocular metastases treated primarily with gamma knife radiosurgery. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies published between Sept 1, 1960, and Feb 1, 2020, reporting the use of gamma knife radiosurgery as primary treatment for uveal melanoma or uveal metastases. The search was restricted to clinical studies and relevant grey literature published in English. Studies reporting treatment of benign tumours, extraocular tumours, or other forms of stereotactic radiosurgery were excluded to reduce heterogeneity. No restrictions were placed on participant criteria. Local tumour control and tumour regression were extracted as the primary outcomes and analysed via a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions using the DerSimonian and Laird method with a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019148165. FINDINGS Our search returned 454 studies, of which 109 were assessed for full-text eligibility. 52 studies, reporting on 1010 patients with uveal melanoma and 34 intraocular metastases, were eligible for systematic review. 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 840 of 898 patients (0·96, 95% CI 0·94-0·97; I2=16%) from 19 studies had local control, and 378 of 478 patients (0·81, 0·70-0·90; I2=83%) from 16 studies experienced tumour regression. INTERPRETATION Gamma knife radiosurgery is an efficacious primary method of treating uveal melanomas and intraocular metastases, with reliable tumour control rates. Randomised controlled trials should further evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamma knife radiosurgery in this setting. FUNDING The Rhodes Trust and the Howard Brain Sciences Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq Parker
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Grant Rigney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Justiss Kallos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - S Tonya Stefko
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pamela Rath
- Everett and Hurite Ophthalmic Association, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|