Health-Related Quality of Life, Satisfaction with Care, and Cosmetic Results in Relation to Treatment among Patients with Keratinocyte Cancer in the Head and Neck Area: Results from the PROFILES Registry

Presentation, Clinical Outcome, and Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Head and Neck Skin Cancer at the University College Hospital, Ibadan

Introduction

Patients with head and neck skin cancer experience adverse functional, psychosocial, and financial impacts as a result of the disease and/or its treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the pattern of presentation, clinical outcomes, and quality of life of patients with head and neck skin cancer.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with head and neck skin cancer presenting to the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, from January 2017 to December 2021. Data obtained from the clinical records included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical and surgical details, as well as clinical outcomes. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

Nineteen patients were reviewed with a median age of 38 years (ranging from 18 to 85 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.4. Eight (42.1%) of the patients were albinos. Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant histologic type (63.2%), while the scalp was the commonest location (42.1%). Only one patient (5.3%) presented with metastatic disease. A greater percentage of treated patients, eight (61.5%), had surgery as the only treatment modality. After a mean follow-up period of 33 months, a recurrence rate of 10.5% (two patients) and a mortality rate of 15.8% (three patients) were recorded. Quality of life assessment revealed an adverse financial impact of the disease on our patients.

Conclusion

Although albinism is a recognized risk factor for skin cancers, head and neck skin cancers can occur in the dark-skinned.

Quality of Life Before and After Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Keratinocyte Carcinoma: A Longitudinal Analysis

PURPOSE

Little is known about patient-reported quality of life (QOL) before and after radiotherapy (RT) for early keratinocyte carcinoma (KC). The present study tested the hypothesis that QOL is hypothesized to deteriorate soon after RT, with subsequent improvement of a magnitude similar to other KC treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This observational study assessed prospectively collected longitudinal patient-reported QOL data at a single center. Patients undergoing external beam RT for early-stage (T0-2, <4 cm) KC that completed the Skindex-16 (S16) or Skin Cancer Index (SCI) before and at least once after RT were included. These indices include subscales of symptoms, emotions, and functioning for S16 and emotional, social, and appearance for SCI.

RESULTS

81 patients (median age 79 years) were treated for early KC, most being basal cell carcinomas (87%) on the face (80%) an average of 1.3 cm in diameter. Composite S16 scores and total SCI scores showed significant, clinically meaningful improvements at 3 months and 6 weeks after RT, respectively. QOL declined at 6 weeks after treatment on the S16 symptoms subscale. Concurrently, S16 and SCI emotional subscales significantly improved, and this trend persisted for 2+ years. Improvements in S16 functioning and SCI social and appearance QOL occurred after RT. The magnitude of improvement in QOL 3-12 months after RT was comparable to what has been previously reported after other types of KC treatments, like surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

QOL related to symptoms deteriorates during the first 6 weeks after RT for early KC, but it improves by 3 months. QOL related to emotions, functioning, social, and appearance all improve after RT. These changes in QOL are similar to those observed after other treatments of early KC.

A Multicenter Prospective Trial of Electronic Skin Surface Brachytherapy for Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Early Cosmesis, Quality of Life, and Adverse Events

PURPOSE

Keratinocyte carcinomas are amenable to many treatments, including radiation therapy (RT). Electronic skin surface brachytherapy (ESSB) enables the precise delivery of radiation without radioisotopes. In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, we characterized early outcomes of ESSB prospectively through both patient- and clinician-reported measures. To corroborate the cosmesis observations, we also assessed patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and adverse events.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients ≥60 years old with stage T1N0M0 keratinocyte carcinoma were treated with ESSB. At 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post-treatment, cosmesis from ESSB was assessed by both the patient and a clinician study investigator as either "good," "fair," or "bad." The Skindex-16 and the Skin Cancer Index (SCI) were used to assess patient QoL before and after treatment. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

RESULTS

Cosmesis and QoL were collected at 97% (99/102) of possible patient follow-up times. By 12 weeks post-treatment, 93.9% (31/33) of patient-reported and 96.9% (31/32) of clinician-reported cosmesis outcomes were "good." Compared with baseline, total Skindex-16 score significantly deteriorated at 2 weeks post-treatment (10.5 vs 24.5, P <.001), but significantly improved at 6 weeks (10.5 vs 4.7, P = .014) and 12 weeks (10.5 vs 2.1, P = .001) post-treatment. The total SCI score significantly improved from baseline to 6 weeks (78.4 vs 89.0, P = .001) post-treatment. The most frequent adverse events were radiation dermatitis, skin pain, and pruritus. All adverse events resolved to Grade ≤1 by 12 weeks post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, multicenter study demonstrated that ESSB is associated with a high rate of "good" early patient-reported cosmesis and increasing QoL and satisfaction with time. Validated assessments demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life and resolution of moderate early adverse events by 6 to 12 weeks after treatment and corroborate the observation of favorable cosmesis.

Health utilities for non-melanoma skin cancers and pre-cancerous lesions: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are common and consume many healthcare resources. A health utility is a single preference-based value for assessing health-related quality of life, which can be used in economic evaluations. There are scarce data on health utilities for NMSCs.

OBJECTIVES

Using a systematic review approach, we synthesized the current data on NMSC-related health utilities.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies of NMSC-related health utilities was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted based on the protocol and a quality assessment was performed for each study.

RESULTS

The protocol resulted in 16 studies, involving 121 621 participants. Mean utility values across the studies ranged from 0.56 to 1 for undifferentiated NMSC, 0.84 to 1 for actinic keratosis, 0.45 to 1 for squamous cell carcinoma, and 0.67 to 1 for basal cell carcinoma. There was considerable variability in utilities by type of cancer, stage of diagnosis, time to treatment, treatment modality, and quality of life instrument or method. Utility values were predominantly based on the EuroQol 5-dimension instrument and ranged from 0.45 to 0.96, while other measurement methods produced values ranging from 0.67 to 1. Lower utility values were observed for advanced cancers and for the time period during and immediately after treatment, after which values gradually returned to pre-treatment levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Most utility values clustered around relatively high values of 0.8 to 1, suggesting small decrements in quality of life associated with most NMSCs and their precursors. Variability in utilities indicates that careful characterization is required for measures to be used in economic evaluations.

Sex-differences in symptoms and functioning in >5000 cancer survivors: Results from the PROFILES registry

BACKGROUND

Previous reports highlight the greater number of side effects that women experience during cancer treatment, but little is known about sex differences in symptoms and functioning in long-term survivors.

METHODS

We investigated sex differences in the prevalence of physical (EORTC QLQ-C30) and emotional symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and loss of functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30) in 5339 cancer survivors (55% males). General linear models were computed to assess the differences in symptoms and functioning between female and male cancer survivors and between survivors and an age-matched reference population.

RESULTS

The direct comparison between female and male cancer survivors identified more symptoms, such as nausea and vomiting (M = 5.0 versus. 3.2), insomnia (M = 26.1 versus. 15.9), anxiety (M = 5.2 versus. 4.2), and lower physical (M = 77.5 versus. 82.5) and emotional functioning (M = 83.4 versus. 86.3), in female survivors. However, comparison with an age-matched reference population demonstrated that several symptoms, such as fatigue, dyspnea, anxiety and depression, appeared to be more frequent in male patients. The investigation of functioning domains - compared with a reference population - highlighted further sex-specific differences. Female survivors experienced a moderate net loss in physical and cognitive functioning (-6.1 [95% CI = -8.1; -4,1] and -5.2 respectively [95% CI = -7; -3.5]), whereas male survivors displayed a significant net loss in role and social functioning compared to the reference population (-9.9 [95% CI = -11.2; -8.6] and -7.7 [95% CI = -9.6; -7.6] respectively).

CONCLUSION

To adequately capture sex differences in symptoms and functioning in long-term cancer survivors, a comparison with a reference population should always be considered. In our study population, this adjustment highlighted a significant and unexpected long-term impact on male patients. Role and social functioning were especially impacted in male patients, emphasizing the need to further investigate these gendered domains.

Predictors of surgical treatment burden, outcomes, and overall survival in older adults with basal cell carcinoma: Results from the prospective, multicenter BATOA cohort

BACKGROUND

Incorporating patient-related factors associated with treatment outcomes could improve personalized care in older patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and identify predictors of treatment burden, treatment outcomes, and overall survival in patients aged ≥70 years, surgically treated for BCC in the head and neck area.

METHODS

The data from the prospective, multicenter Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment in Older Adults (BATOA) cohort study were extracted to evaluate the experienced treatment burden (visual analog scale, 0-10 cm; lower scores indicating higher treatment burden), treatment outcomes, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 539 patients were included (median age, 78 years). The patients experienced a low overall treatment burden (median, 8.6) and good cosmetic results. The predictors of higher treatment burden were instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) dependency, female sex, complications, larger tumor diameter, and polypharmacy. Thirty-five patients (6.5%) died (none of the deaths were due to BCC) within the follow-up period; the predictors of mortality were increasing comorbidity index and iADL dependency. No difference in these outcomes was seen between Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excision after correction for covariates. Age was not significantly associated with any outcome.

LIMITATIONS

A selection bias may exist owing to the observational design.

CONCLUSION

BCC management decisions based on chronological age alone should be avoided, whereas more attention is recommended for patient-related factors. Based on these data, early BCC intervention is beneficial for robust and fit patients or those experiencing symptoms.