Iglói Z, van Loo IHM, Demandt AMP, Franssen K, Jonges M, van Gelder M, Erkens-Hulshof S, van Alphen LB. Controlling a human parainfluenza virus-3 outbreak in a haematology ward in a tertiary hospital: the importance of screening strategy and molecular diagnostics in relation to clinical symptoms.
J Hosp Infect 2022;
126:56-63. [PMID:
35483642 DOI:
10.1016/j.jhin.2022.03.017]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Human parainfluenza 3 (HPIV-3) outbreak at the haemato-oncology ward of the Maastricht University Medical Center in the summer of 2016.
AIM
To describe an effective strategy to control the largest reported HPIV-3 outbreak at an adult haematology-oncology ward in the Netherlands by implementing infection control measures and molecular epidemiology investigation.
METHODS
Clinical, patient and diagnostic data were both pro- and retrospectively collected. HPIV-3 real-time-PCR (HPIV-3 RT-PCR) was validated using oropharyngeal rinse samples. Screening of all new and admitted patients was implemented to identify asymptomatic infection or prolonged shedding of HPIV-3 allowing cohort isolation.
FINDINGS
The HPIV-3 outbreak occurred between 9 July and 28 September 2016 and affected 53 patients. HPIV-3 RT-PCR on oropharyngeal rinse samples demonstrated an up to tenfold higher sensitivity compared to pharyngeal swabs. Monitoring showed that at first positive PCR, 20 patients (38%) were asymptomatic (of which 11 remained asymptomatic) and the average duration of shedding was 14 days (range 1-58). Asymptomatic patients had lower viral load, shorter period of viral shedding (≤14 days) and were mostly immune competent oncology patients. The outbreak was under control 5 weeks after implementation of screening of asymptomatic patients.
CONCLUSION
Implementation of a sensitive screening method identified both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients which had lower viral load and allowed early cohort isolation. This is especially important in a ward that combines patients with varying immune status, since both immunocompromised and immune competent patients are likely to spread the HPIV-3 virus, either through prolonged shedding or through asymptomatic course of disease.
Collapse