Predictive Power of Bone Turnover Biomarkers to Estimate Bone Mineral Density after Kidney Transplantation with or without Denosumab: A post hoc Analysis of the POSTOP Study

Associations of Changes in Bone Turnover Markers with Change in Bone Mineral Density in Kidney Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Bone loss after kidney transplantation is highly variable. We investigated whether changes in bone turnover markers associate with bone loss during the first post-transplant year.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 0 and 12 months, with biointact parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), intact procollagen type I N -terminal propeptide (PINP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b) measured at 0, 3, and 12 months post-transplant ( N =209). Paired transiliac bone biopsies were available in a subset ( n =49). Between-group differences were evaluated by Student's t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or Pearson's chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Changes in BMD varied from -22% to +17%/yr. Compared with patients with no change (±2.5%/yr), patients who gained BMD had higher levels of parathyroid hormone (236 versus 136 pg/ml), BALP (31.7 versus 18.8 μ g/L), and Intact PINP (121.9 versus 70.4 μ g/L) at time of transplantation; a greater decrease in BALP (-40% versus -21%) and Intact PINP (-43% versus -13%) by 3 months; and lower levels of Intact PINP (36.3 versus 60.0 μ g/L) at 12 months post-transplant. Patients who lost BMD had a less marked decrease, or even increase, in Intact PINP (+22% versus -13%) and TRAP5b (-27% versus -43%) at 3 months and higher Intact PINP (83.7 versus 60.0 μ g/L) and TRAP5b (3.89 versus 3.16 U/L) at 12 months compared with patients with no change. If none of the biomarkers decreased by the least significant change at 3 months, an almost two-fold (69% versus 36%) higher occurrence of bone loss was seen at 12 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss after kidney transplantation was highly variable. Resolution of high bone turnover, as reflected by decreasing bone turnover markers, associated with BMD gain, while increasing bone turnover markers associated with bone loss.

Post-Transplant Bone Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Diagnosis and Management

Kidney transplantation is the preferred gold standard modality of treatment for kidney failure. Bone disease after kidney transplantation is highly prevalent in patients living with a kidney transplant and is associated with high rates of hip fractures. Fractures are associated with increased healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. Post-transplant bone disease (PTBD) includes renal osteodystrophy, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis and bone fractures. PTBD is complex as it encompasses pre-existing chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disease and compounding factors after transplantation, including the use of immunosuppression and the development of de novo bone disease. After transplantation, the persistence of secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy, relative vitamin D deficiency and high levels of fibroblast growth factor-23 contribute to post-transplant bone disease. Risk assessment includes identifying both general risk factors and kidney-specific risk factors. Diagnosis is complex as the gold standard bone biopsy with double-tetracycline labelling to diagnose the PTBD subtype is not always readily available. Therefore, alternative diagnostic tools may be used to aid its diagnosis. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy can be employed to treat PTBD. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiology, risk assessment, diagnosis and management strategies to manage PTBD after kidney transplantation.

Elevated bone turnover markers predict bone mineral density accrual in adolescents with 21-hydroxylase deficiency

CONTEXT

Prognostic biomarkers for monitoring bone health in adolescents with 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess associations between concentrations of baseline bone turnover markers (BTMs) including osteocalcin (OC) and type-I collagen C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) in adolescents with classic 21OHD.

DESIGNS AND PATIENTS

A retrospective-prospective study of 33 adolescents with classic 21OHD who had baseline data for LSBMD, bone age (BA), and BTM concentrations.

METHODS

BTM concentrations were converted into z-scores according to BA. We measured LSBMD at the follow-up study visit and calculated the annual percentage change in LSBMD (%∆LSBMD).

RESULTS

At baseline, participants (55% female, 79% Tanner 5) had mean (±SD) age of 14.6 ± 3.6 years, BA 16.7 ± 2.9 years, and average glucocorticoid (GC) dose 17.3 ± 5.6 mg/m2 /day of hydrocortisone equivalent. The mean follow-up duration was 14.4 ± 5.6 months. Median (Q1-Q3) %∆LSBMD was 3.6% (0-8.5)/year. %∆LSBMD was similar among genders or 21OHD subtypes. Prednisolone versus hydrocortisone replacement resulted in lower %∆LSBMD (p = .004). %∆LSBMD was increased across tertiles of CTX z-score (p = .014). %∆LSBMD correlated negatively with GC dose (p = .01) and positively with CTX and OC z-scores (p < .01). In regression analyses, only CTX z-score positively associated with %∆LSBMD (p = .003), adjusting for sex, BA, body mass index, testosterone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and GC type and dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher GC dose and the use of prednisolone were associated with decreased LSBMD accrual in adolescents with 21OHD. CTX z-score independently associated with LSBMD accrual, suggesting its potential for prognostic bone biomarker.

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of alendronate versus denosumab in kidney transplant patients with reduced bone mineral density

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of denosumab and alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) with low bone mass.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either denosumab subcutaneously (60 mg/6 months), oral alendronate (70 mg/week), or no treatment for 1 year. The three groups were prescribed daily calcium and vitamin D. Primary outcome was BMD assessed at lumbar spine, hip, and radius and measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Adverse events and laboratory assessments (calcium, phosphate, vitamin D, renal functions, and intact parathyroid hormone) were monitored for all patients. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months for all patients.

RESULTS

Ninety RTRs were included in the study (30 in each group). Baseline clinical characteristics and BMD values were comparable in the three groups. After 12 months, lumbar spine T-score of patients treated with denosumab and alendronate showed a median increase of 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.6] and 0.5 (95% CI: 0.4-0.8), respectively, and patients in the control group showed a decrease of -0.2 (95% CI: -0.3 to -0.1), p < 0.001. Denosumab and alendronate showed a significant comparable gain in T-scores at hip and radius versus a significant decrease in the control group. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar in the three groups. Both treatments resulted in comparable significant improvement in physical functioning, physical role limitations, vitality, and pain scores.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab and alendronate showed comparable efficacy in improving BMD at all measured skeletal sites and were safe and well-tolerated, with no serious adverse effects reported in RTRs with low bone mass. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04169698.

Predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab

OBJECTIVES

To investigate efficacy of long-term treatment with denosumab and predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO).

METHODS

We enrolled 111 PMO patients who had T-scores ≤-2.5 either at the lumbar spine (L-) or femoral neck (FN-), who had never been treated for osteoporosis, and who could be followed for at least 3 years. We first evaluated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) for up to 7 years. We next defined the treatment goal as the achievement of a T-score >-2.5 at month 36 and performed multivariate analysis to identify predictive factors for achievement of the goal.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine- and femoral neck bone-mineral density increased yearly for 7 years. Among 87 patients with baseline L-T-scores ≤-2.5, better baseline L-T-scores predicted achievement of L-T-scores >-2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline L-T-score was -3.4. Among 76 patients with baseline FN-T-scores ≤-2.5, better baseline FN-T-scores predicted achievement of FN-T-scores >-2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline FN-T-scores was -2.8.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with denosumab was effective in PMO patients. As better baseline T-score predicted achievement of T-scores >-2.5, early initiation of treatment will contribute to better outcome.

Natural History of Bone Disease following Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the effect of kidney transplantation on bone is limited and fragmentary. The aim of this study was to characterize the evolution of bone disease in the first post-transplant year.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational cohort study in patients referred for kidney transplantation under a steroid-sparing immunosuppressive protocol. Bone phenotyping was done before, or at the time of, kidney transplantation, and repeated at 12 months post-transplant. The phenotyping included bone histomorphometry, bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and biochemical parameters of bone and mineral metabolism.

RESULTS

Paired data were obtained for 97 patients (median age 55 years; 72% male; 21% of patients had diabetes). Bone turnover remained normal or improved in the majority of patients (65%). Bone histomorphometry revealed decreases in bone resorption (eroded perimeter, mean 4.6% pre- to 2.3% post-transplant; P<0.001) and disordered bone formation (fibrosis, 27% pre- versus 2% post-transplant; P<0.001). Whereas bone mineralization was normal in all but one patient pretransplant, delayed mineralization was seen in 15% of patients at 1 year post-transplant. Hypophosphatemia was associated with deterioration in histomorphometric parameters of bone mineralization. Changes in bone mineral density were highly variable, ranging from -18% to +17% per year. Cumulative steroid dose was related to bone loss at the hip, whereas resolution of hyperparathyroidism was related to bone gain at both spine and hip.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in bone turnover, mineralization, and volume post-transplant are related both to steroid exposure and ongoing disturbances of mineral metabolism. Optimal control of mineral metabolism may be key to improving bone quality in kidney transplant recipients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Evolution of Bone Histomorphometry and Vascular Calcification Before and After Renal Transplantation, NCT01886950.