1
|
Watanabe Y, Naganuma T, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Colombo A. Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions in elderly people. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 104:181-190. [PMID: 38988147 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the elderly people with unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often selected as first choice treatment strategy because of perioperative high risk of coronary artery bypass graft surgery due to their large number of comorbidities. Also, some recent papers reported that geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is also strongly associated with clinical outcomes after interventional procedures in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD and the impact of GNRI in elderly patients. METHODS We identified 669 non dialysis patients treated with current generation drug-eluting stent for ULMD from MITO registry. We divided the patients to the following 2 groups; elderly group (n = 240, age ≥75) and young group (n = 429, age <75). Additionally, we could calculate GNRI and divided elderly group into 2 group based on the median value of the GNRI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS All-cause mortality was significantly higher in elderly group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-4.02; p = 0.001]. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in low GNRI elderly group compared to other 2 groups (Adjusted HR of elderly with low GNRI: 3.56, 95%CI (1.77-7.14), p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was comparable between two groups. TLR rate was significantly lower in elderly group (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS The elderly had higher all-cause mortality after PCI for ULMD compared to young people. Especially, the elderly with low GNRI were extremely associated with poorer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Watanabe
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toru Naganuma
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watanabe Y, Mitomo S, Naganuma T, Matsuoka S, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Tahara S, Okutsu M, Kuroita N, Nakamura S, Nakamura S, Colombo A. Impact of Left Main Calcium With Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Narrowings (from the Milan and New-Tokyo Registry). Am J Cardiol 2022; 168:31-38. [PMID: 35144770 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Limited data are available about the association between coronary artery calcification and chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to assess the association between coronary artery calcification and chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after PCI. We identified 1,391 patients treated with drug-eluting stent for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD), including 604 without calcified lesions (noncalcified left main group) and 787 with calcified ULMD (calcified left main group) in Japan and Italy. We divided the calcified group into the following 2 groups: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 (n = 687) and <30 (n = 100) and compared the clinical outcomes. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and myocardial infarction. TLF occurred more frequently in the calcified group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.71, p = 0.01), especially in calcified ULMD with eGFR <30 (adjusted hazard ratio relative to the other 2 groups 2.59, 95% confidence interval 1.60 to 4.18, p <0.001). In conclusion, the calcified ULMD treated with PCI was associated with poorer clinical outcomes than noncalcified ULMD, especially in those with eGFR <30.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Watanabe
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Satoru Mitomo
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toru Naganuma
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsuoka
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Montorfano
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Satoko Tahara
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaaki Okutsu
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Kuroita
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shotaro Nakamura
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sunao Nakamura
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jäckel M, Kaier K, Rilinger J, Wolf D, Peikert A, Roth K, Oettinger V, Dawid Leander S, Zehender M, Bode C, Constantin VZM, Stachon P. Outcomes of female and male patients suffering from coronary artery disease: A nation-wide registry of patients admitted as emergency. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27298. [PMID: 34559142 PMCID: PMC8462577 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Presentation and mortality of coronary artery disease (CAD) substantially differs in both sexes. Most of the existing data analyzing sex differences is older than 10 years and mostly was retrieved in clinical trials, which are potentially structured with a bias against the inclusion of women, leading to a potential selection-bias. Meanwhile, with better diagnostic and therapeutic options, actual data analyzing sex differences in emergency CAD patients is rare.Data on all emergency case numbers with CAD diagnosis in Germany 2017 was retrieved from the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information. DRG, OPS, and ICD codes were used to determine comorbidities, in-hospital course, and outcome. Competing risk regression analysis for in-hospital mortality was performed analyzing age, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), severity of CAD, clinical presentation type and sex.264,742 patients were included. Female patients were older and had more comorbidities. Three-vessel CAD was significantly less present in female patients (36.5% vs 47.5%; P < .001). After adjusting for age, EuroSCORE and severity of CAD, female sex was an independent predictor of lower in-hospital mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98, P = .002) in the whole cohort and in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients (sHR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.92, P < .001), whereas in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, female sex was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality (sHR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, P = .029).In all patients admitted as emergency with CAD diagnosis and in all NSTEMI patients, female sex is protective, whereas in STEMI patients, females show a higher in-hospital mortality risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Jäckel
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Rilinger
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dennis Wolf
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Peikert
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Roth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vera Oettinger
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Staudacher Dawid Leander
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Zehender
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Bode
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Von Zur Mühlen Constantin
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Stachon
- University Heart Center Freiburg, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology, Heart Center Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|