Clinical and Inflammatory Features of Exacerbation-Prone Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Multidimensional Assessment

Assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness to salbutamol or ipratropium using different criteria in treatment-naïve patients with asthma and COPD

Background

The criteria for significant bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) were published in 2005 by the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society, which were revised in 2021, however, data on the agreement between these two recommendations in untreated patients with airflow limitation are missing.

Aims

We aimed to study BDR to salbutamol (SABA) or ipratropium bromide (SAMA) in patients with suspected bronchial asthma or COPD at initial clinical presentation using the 2005 and 2021 criteria and explore clinical factors associated with BDR+.

Methods

Symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients with expiratory airflow limitation (n = 105, 57 men, age (mean ± standard deviation): 65 ± 10 years) underwent BDR testing with 400 mcg salbutamol (day 1) or 80 mcg ipratropium bromide (day 2) and BDR was measured after 15 and 30 minutes. Clinical factors with risk for BDR+ were assessed with binomial logistic regression analysis.

Results

We found a good agreement between the number of 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ patients at 15 and 30 minutes post-salbutamol and post-ipratropium (88.6-94.8%). More patients showed BDR+ after 30 minutes than following 15 minutes using either criterion. When results at 30 minutes are considered, the number of patients with 2005-BDR+ (82%) was higher than that of 2021-BDR+ (75%), with the proportion of SAMA+ patients being higher than that of SABA+ (2005: 70% vs. 49%, Fisher exact p < 0.01; 2021: 64% vs. 41%, p = 0.001). 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ to SABA were associated with decreasing pre-BD FEV1% predicted and the presence of cough. More patients with asthma were in the SABA+ group compared to the SAMA+ group (2005: 71% vs. 53%, Fischer exact p = 0.04; 2021: 77% vs. 52%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Fewer patients show BDR+ according to the 2021 criteria in comparison with the 2005 recommendations, and protocols for BDR testing may consider the assessment of response to both SABA and SAMA after 30 minutes.

Clinical characteristics of obese, fixed airway obstruction, exacerbation-prone phenotype and comorbidities among severe asthma patients: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma places a large burden on patients and society. The characteristics of patients with severe asthma in the Chinese population remain unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in patients with severe asthma. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Patients were grouped according to phenotypes in terms of exacerbations, body mass index (BMI) and fixed airway obstruction (FAO) status, and the characteristics of different groups were compared. Comorbidities, factors that influence asthma phenotypes, were also analyzed in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients with severe asthma were included in our study. They were more likely to be overweight or obese. A total of 41.7% of the patients received GINA step 5 therapy, and 43.4% had a history of receiving regular or intermittent oral corticosteroids (OCS). Severe asthmatic patients with comorbidities were prone to have more asthma symptoms and decreased quality of life than patients without comorbidities. Patients with exacerbations were characterized by longer duration of asthma, poorer lung function, and worse asthma control. Overweight or obese patients tended to have more asthma symptoms, poorer lung function and more asthma-related comorbidities. Compared to patients without FAO, those in the FAO group were older, with longer duration of asthma and more exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

The existence of comorbidities in patients with severe asthma could result in more asthma symptoms and decreased quality of life. Patients with exacerbations or with overweight or obese phenotypes were characterized by poorer lung function and worse asthma control. Patients with FAO phenotype tended to have more exacerbations.

Modelling ASthma TrEatment Responses (MASTER): Effect of individual patient characteristics on the risk of exacerbation in moderate or severe asthma: A time-to-event analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIMS

There is limited understanding of how clinical and demographic characteristics are associated with exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, and how these factors correlate with symptom control and treatment response. Here we assess the relationship between baseline characteristics and exacerbation risk during regular dosing with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) monotherapy or in combination with long-acting beta2-agonists (ICS/LABA) in clinical trial patients with varying levels of symptom control, as assessed by the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5).

METHODS

A time-to-event model was developed using pooled patient data (N = 16 282) from nine clinical studies [Correction added on 26 July 2023, after first online publication: The N value in the preceding sentence has been corrected in this version.]. A parametric hazard function was used to describe the time-to-first exacerbation. Covariate analysis included the assessment of the effect of seasonal variation, clinical and demographic baseline characteristics on baseline hazard. Predictive performance was evaluated by standard graphical and statistical methods.

RESULTS

An exponential hazard model best described the time-to-first exacerbation in moderate-to-severe asthma patients. Body mass index, smoking status, sex, ACQ-5, % predicted forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV1 p) and season were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting baseline hazard irrespective of ICS or ICS/LABA use. Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the baseline hazard (30.8%) relative to FP monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interindividual differences at baseline and seasonal variation affect the exacerbation risk independently from drug treatment. Moreover, it appears that even when a comparable level of symptom control is achieved in a group of patients, each individual may have a different exacerbation risk, depending on their baseline characteristics and time of the year. These findings highlight the importance of personalized interventions in moderate-to-severe asthma patients.

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: The current state of knowledge

Objectives

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are distinct from baseline symptomatology related to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this review, we seek to examine the literature on AECRS to synthesize the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and impact of AECRS on CRS patients.

Methods

A comprehensive narrative review of the scientific literature, identified by searching PubMed from inception through April 2022, was performed.

Results

AECRS is defined in consensus guidelines as a worsening of chronic sinus disease symptomatology, with a return to baseline, typically after intervention with systemic antibiotics and/or corticosteroids. The working definition used across the literature, however, is broad and heterogeneous. The pathophysiology of AECRS is incompletely understood but is hypothesized to include an interplay of environmental and patient-specific factors. AECRS have been found to have a negative impact on quality-of-life measures, independent of baseline CRS symptomatology, and impact how patients and physicians view overall disease control. Treatment for AECRS includes oral antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids, although their efficacy for AECRS is unclear. Appropriate use of medical and surgical treatment for CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS.

Conclusions

AECRS are a distinct entity in CRS patients and should be independently assessed when evaluating patients for CRS control. The efficacy of systemic medication usage for AECRS is currently unclear, but appropriate medical management of baseline CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. More research is needed to further understand this phenomenon, including a more precise and prospective definition, defined epidemiology, and how to appropriately treat.

Level of Evidence

5.

The Impact of Social Distancing in 2020 on Admission Rates for Exacerbations in Asthma: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background

Social distancing measures introduced during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic have reduced admission rates for various infectious and noninfectious respiratory diseases. We hypothesized that rates of asthma exacerbations would decline following the national lockdown in Denmark.

Objective

To determine weekly rates of in- and out-of-hospital asthma exacerbations before and during the social distancing intervention implemented on March 12, 2020.

Methods

All individuals older than 18 years with at least 1 outpatient hospital contact with asthma as the main diagnosis from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, were included. Weekly asthma exacerbation rates from January 1, 2018, to May 22, 2020, were calculated. An interrupted time-series model with the lockdown on March 12, 2020, as the point of interruption was used.

Results

A total of 38,225 patients with asthma were identified. The interrupted time-series model showed no immediate fall in exacerbation rates during the first week after March 12, 2020. However, there was a significant decline in weekly exacerbation rates in the following 10 weeks (change in trend for exacerbations requiring hospitalization: −0.75 [95% CI, −1.39 to −0.12]; P < .02 and in all asthma exacerbations: −12.2 [95% CI, −19.1 to −5.4; P < .001), amounting to a reduction of approximately 1 and 16.5 exacerbations per year per 100 patients in the cohort, respectively.

Conclusions

The introduction of the social distancing measures in Denmark did not lead to an immediate reduction in asthma exacerbation rates; however, a gradual decline in exacerbation rates during the following 10-week period was observed.

Interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment: A cross-sectional study

Background: Symptomatic asthma and rhinitis negatively impact patients' work productivity and activity. However, little is known about the potential interaction effect of both asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment. Objective: This study aimed to explore whether there are interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control on work productivity and activity impairment in patients with asthma and with rhinitis. Methods: A total of 206 adult patients were prospectively recruited and were divided into four groups: both poorly controlled (BPC) n = 53), poorly controlled asthma (PCA) with controlled rhinitis (CR) (n = 38), well controlled asthma with uncontrolled rhinitis (n = 43), and both well controlled (BWC) (n = 72) based on the symptom control status of asthma and rhinitis. Work productivity loss and activity impairment, asthma control, and rhinitis control were assessed by using work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire: general health, the asthma control test, and the rhinitis control assessment test, respectively. General linear regression models were used to study the contribution of asthma control, rhinitis control, and the interaction effect on work productivity and activity impairment. Results: Work productivity loss was most frequently reported in patients in the BPC group. Compared with the patients in the BWC group, the patients in the PCA-CR group had significantly higher activity impairment and worse asthma-related quality of life (both p < 0.001). There were significant interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control, which accounted for the increase in presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment (all p < 0.001). Although differences in absenteeism were not significant among the groups, there was a significant interaction effect of control levels accounted for absenteeism (p = 0.035). Conclusion: Distinct interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control reflected a link between upper and lower airways, which indicated that rhinitis control and the interaction effects of asthma and rhinitis control cannot be neglected during asthma management.

Asthma and Comorbid Conditions-Pulmonary Comorbidity

Pulmonary comorbidities can increase disease severity and health care costs associated with asthma management. Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction is a common comorbidity that results from intermittent laryngeal obstruction. Patients describe distinct episodes of dyspnea that do not respond to bronchodilators. Inspiratory stridor is common. The gold standard diagnostic testing strategy is continuous laryngoscopy performed during exercise or irritant challenges. Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is an overarching term that describes conditions with a chronic change in the pattern of breathing that results in pulmonary and extrapulmonary symptoms. The prevalence of DB in asthma is up to 30%, and breathing retraining can improve symptoms and quality of life in people with DB and asthma. Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) refers to both asthmatics who develop fixed airflow obstruction after a history of exposure to smoke or biomass and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have "asthmatic features" such as a large bronchodilator response, elevated levels of serum IgE, or peripheral eosinophil counts ≥300 per μL. Triple inhaler therapy with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist/long-acting muscarinic should be considered in people with ACO and severe symptoms or frequent exacerbations. The clinical expression of bronchiectasis involves persistent mucus hypersecretion, recurrent exacerbations of infective bronchitis, incompletely reversible airflow obstruction, and lung fibrosis and can occur in up to 30% of adults with longstanding asthma. The treatable traits strategy is a useful model of care to manage the complexity and heterogeneity of asthma with pulmonary comorbidity.