Switching Monopolar No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation Using Octopus Electrodes for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Local Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2024 Expert Consensus-Based Practical Recommendations of the Korean Liver Cancer Association

Local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a non-surgical option that directly targets and destroys tumor cells, has advanced significantly since the 1990s. Therapies with different energy sources, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, employ different mechanisms to induce tumor necrosis. The precision, safety, and effectiveness of these therapies have increased with advances in guiding technologies and device improvements. Consequently, local ablation has become the first-line treatment for early-stage HCC. The lack of organized evidence and expert opinions regarding patient selection, pre-procedure preparation, procedural methods, swift post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up has resulted in clinicians following varied practices. Therefore, an expert consensus-based practical recommendation for local ablation was developed by a group of experts in radiology and hepatology from the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association in collaboration with the Korean Society of Image-guided Tumor Ablation to provide useful information and guidance for performing local ablation and for the pre- and post-treatment management of patients.

Incremental high power radiofrequency ablation with multi-electrodes for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) offers a minimally invasive treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it faces challenges such as high local recurrence rates. This prospective study, conducted from January 2020 to July 2022, evaluated a novel approach using a three-channel, dual radiofrequency (RF) generator with separable clustered electrodes to improve RFA's efficacy and safety. The study employed a high-power, gradual, stepwise RFA method on HCCs (≤ 4 cm), utilizing real-time ultrasound-computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion imaging. Involving 110 participants with 116 HCCs, the study reported no major complications. Local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic remote recurrence (IRR) rates were low, with promising cumulative incidences at 1, 2, and 3 years for LTP (0.9%, 3.6%, 7.0%) and IRR (13.9%, 20.5%, 31.4%). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were similarly encouraging: LTP (99.1%, 96.4%, 93.0%) and IRR (86.1%, 79.5%, 68.6%). This innovative gradual, incremental high-power RFA technique, featuring a dual switching monopolar mode and three electrodes, represents an effective and safer management option for small HCCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT05397860, first registered on 26/05/2022.

Local Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical Significance of Tumor Size, Location, and Biology

ABSTRACT

Local ablation therapy, encompassing radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and cryoablation, has emerged as a crucial strategy for managing small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), complementing liver resection and transplantation. This review delves into the clinical significance of tumor size, location, and biology in guiding treatment decisions for HCCs undergoing local ablation therapy, with a focus on tumors smaller than 3 cm. Tumor size significantly influences treatment outcomes, with larger tumors associated with poorer local tumor control due to challenges in creating sufficient ablative margins and the likelihood of microvascular invasion and peritumoral satellite nodules. Advanced ablation techniques such as centripetal or no-touch RFA using multiple electrodes, cryoablation using multiple cryoprobes, and microwave ablation offer diverse options for HCC treatment. Notably, no-touch RFA demonstrates superior local tumor control compared with conventional RFA by achieving sufficient ablative margins, making it particularly promising for hepatic dome lesions or tumors with aggressive biology. Laparoscopic RFA proves beneficial for treating anterior subphrenic HCCs, whereas artificial pleural effusion-assisted RFA is effective for controlling posterior subphrenic HCCs. However, surgical resection generally offers better survival outcomes for periportal HCCs compared with RFA. Cryoablation exhibits a lower incidence of vascular or biliary complications than RFA for HCCs adjacent to perivascular or periductal regions. Additionally, aggressive tumor biology, such as microvascular invasion, can be predicted using magnetic resonance imaging findings and serum tumor markers. Aggressive HCC subtypes frequently exhibit Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System M features on magnetic resonance imaging, aiding in prognosis. A comprehensive understanding of tumor size, location, and biology is imperative for optimizing the benefits of local ablation therapy in managing HCCs.

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation Using Twin Cooled Wet Electrodes for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Locoregional Treatments

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) using twin cooled wet (TCW) electrodes in patients experiencing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after undergoing locoregional treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-arm study of NT-RFA involving 102 patients, with a total of 112 recurrent HCCs (each ≤ 3 cm). NT-RFA with TCW electrodes was implemented under the guidance of ultrasonography (US)-MR/CT fusion imaging. If NT-RFA application proved technically challenging, conversion to conventional tumor puncture RFA was permitted. The primary metric for evaluation was the mid-term cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) observed post-RFA. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to explore factors associated with LTP. Considering conversion cases from NT-RFA to conventional RFA, intention-to-treat (ITT; including all patients) and per-protocol (PP; including patients not requiring conversion to conventional RFA alone) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Conversion from NT-RFA to conventional RFA was necessary for 24 (21.4%) out of 112 tumors. Successful treatment was noted in 111 (99.1%) out of them. No major complications were reported among the patients. According to ITT analysis, the estimated cumulative incidences of LTP were 1.9%, 6.0%, and 6.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years post-RFA, respectively. In PP analysis, the cumulative incidence of LTP was 0.0%, 1.3%, and 1.3% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The number of previous locoregional HCC treatments (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.265 per 1 treatment increase; P = 0.004), total bilirubin (aHR, 7.477 per 1 mg/dL increase; P = 0.012), and safety margin ≤ 5 mm (aHR, 9.029; P = 0.016) were independently associated with LTP in ITT analysis.

CONCLUSION

NT-RFA using TCW electrodes is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent HCC, with 6.0% (ITT analysis) and 1.3% (PP analysis) cumulative incidence of LTP at 2 and 3-year follow-ups.

LI-RADS category is associated with treatment outcomes of small single HCC: surgical resection vs. radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category is associated with the treatment outcomes of small single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection (SR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 357 patients who underwent SR (n = 209) or RFA (n = 148) for a single HCC of ≤ 3 cm between 2014 and 2016. LI-RADS categories were assigned. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates after treatment were compared according to the LI-RADS category (LR-4/5 vs. LR-M) before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Prognostic factors for treatment outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 357 patients (mean age, 59 years; men, 272) with 357 HCCs (294 LR-4/5 and 63 LR-M) were included. After PSM (n = 78 in each treatment group), there were 10 and 11 LR-M HCCs in the SR and RFA group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS or RFS. However, SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA (1.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.001). SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for LR-M HCCs (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and LR-4/5 HCCs (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

LI-RADS classification is associated with the treatment outcome of HCC, supporting favorable outcomes of SR over RFA for LTP, especially for HCCs categorized as LR-M.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category has a potential prognostic role, supporting favorable outcomes of surgical resection over radiofrequency ablation for local tumor progression, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma categorized as LR-M.

KEY POINTS

• SR provided a lower 5-year LTP rate than RFA for HCCs categorized as LR-M (0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.062) and HCCs categorized as LR-4/5 (1.5% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.008). • There is a steeply increased risk of LTP within 1 year after RFA for LR-M HCCs, compared to SR. • The LI-RADS category was the sole risk factor associated with poor OS (HR 3.79, p = 0.004), RFS (HR 2.12; p = 0.001), and LTP (HR 2.89; p = 0.032) in patients with HCC of ≤ 3 cm treated with SR or RFA.

Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

A wide range of ablative and non-surgical therapies are available for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with very early or early-stage disease and preserved liver function.

Objective

To review and compare the effectiveness of all current ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm).

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources

Nine databases (March 2021), two trial registries (April 2021) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews.

Review methods

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of ablative and non-surgical therapies, versus any comparator, for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomised controlled trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and mapped. The comparative effectiveness of therapies was assessed using network meta-analysis. A threshold analysis was used to identify which comparisons were sensitive to potential changes in the evidence. Where comparisons based on randomised controlled trial evidence were not robust or no randomised controlled trials were identified, a targeted systematic review of non-randomised, prospective comparative studies provided additional data for repeat network meta-analysis and threshold analysis. The feasibility of undertaking economic modelling was explored. A workshop with patients and clinicians was held to discuss the findings and identify key priorities for future research.

Results

Thirty-seven randomised controlled trials (with over 3700 relevant patients) were included in the review. The majority were conducted in China or Japan and most had a high risk of bias or some risk of bias concerns. The results of the network meta-analysis were uncertain for most comparisons. There was evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection is inferior to radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.82), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% credible interval 1.11 to 1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 1.02 to 1.39) and local recurrence (relative risk 1.80, 95% credible interval 1.19 to 2.71). Percutaneous acid injection was also inferior to radiofrequency ablation for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% credible interval 1.05 to 2.51). Threshold analysis showed that further evidence could plausibly change the result for some comparisons. Fourteen eligible non-randomised studies were identified (n ≥ 2316); twelve had a high risk of bias so were not included in updated network meta-analyses. Additional non-randomised data, made available by a clinical advisor, were also included (n = 303). There remained a high level of uncertainty in treatment rankings after the network meta-analyses were updated. However, the updated analyses suggested that microwave ablation and resection are superior to percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for some outcomes. Further research on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was recommended at the workshop, although it is only appropriate for certain patient subgroups, limiting opportunities for adequately powered trials.

Limitations

Many studies were small and of poor quality. No comparative studies were found for some therapies.

Conclusions

The existing evidence base has limitations; the uptake of specific ablative therapies in the United Kingdom appears to be based more on technological advancements and ease of use than strong evidence of clinical effectiveness. However, there is evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection are inferior to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and resection.

Study registration

PROSPERO CRD42020221357.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131224) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and strategies for optimal outcomes

Although hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with a poor prognosis, management of early-stage HCC is often successful with highly efficacious treatment modalities such as liver transplantation, surgical resection, and radiofrequency ablation. However, unfavorable clinical outcomes have been observed under certain circumstances, even after efficient treatment. Factors that predict unsuitable results after treatment include tumor markers, inflammatory markers, imaging findings reflecting tumor biology, specific outcome indicators for each treatment modality, liver functional reserve, and the technical feasibility of the treatment modalities. Various strategies may overcome these challenges, including the application of reinforced treatment indication criteria with predictive markers reflecting tumor biology, compensation for technical issues with up-to-date technologies, modification of treatment modalities, downstaging with locoregional therapies (such as transarterial chemotherapy or radiotherapy), and recently introduced combination immunotherapies. In this review, we discuss the challenges to achieving optimal outcomes in the management of early-stage HCC and suggest strategies to overcome these obstacles.

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2023 Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation Guidelines

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely used to manage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) equal to or smaller than 3 cm. No-touch RFA has gained attention and has recently been implemented in local ablation therapy for HCCs, despite its technical complexity, as it provides improved local tumor control compared to conventional tumor-puncturing RFA. This article presents the practice guidelines for performing no-touch RFA for HCCs, which have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation (KSITA). The guidelines are primarily designed to assist interventional oncologists and address the limitations of conventional tumor-puncturing RFA with describing the fundamental principles, various energy delivery methods, and clinical outcomes of no-touch RFA. The clinical outcomes include technical feasibility, local tumor progression rates, survival outcomes, and potential complications.

Treatment Outcomes of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Effects of the Electrode Type and Placement Method

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association among the electrode placement method, electrode type, and local tumor progression (LTP) following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and to assess the risk factors for LTP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 211 patients, including 150 males and 61 females, who had undergone ultrasound-guided RFA for a single HCC < 3 cm. Patients were divided into four combination groups of the electrode type and placement method: 1) tumor-puncturing with an internally cooled tip (ICT), 2) tumor-puncturing with an internally cooled wet tip (ICWT), 3) no-touch with ICT, and 4) no-touch with ICWT. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for LTP. The major RFA-related complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 83, 34, 80, and 14 patients were included in the ICT, ICWT, no-touch with ICT, and no-touch with ICWT groups, respectively. The cumulative LTP rates differed significantly among the four groups. Compared to tumor puncturing with ICT, tumor puncturing with ICWT was associated with a lower LTP risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0-0.88, P = 0.034). However, the cumulative LTP rate did not differ significantly between tumor-puncturing with ICT and no-touch RFA with ICT (aHR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.03-1.62, P = 0.188) or ICWT (aHR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0-2.28, P = 0.294). An insufficient ablative margin was a risk factor for LTP (aHR = 6.13, 95% CI = 1.41-22.49, P = 0.019). The major complication rates were 1.2%, 0%, 2.5%, and 21.4% in the ICT, ICWT, no-touch with ICT, and no-touch with ICWT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICWT was associated with a lower LTP rate compared to ICT when performing tumor-puncturing RFA. An insufficient ablation margin was a risk factor for LTP.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in a recent cohort at a tertiary cancer center: incidence and factors associated with major complications and unexpected hospitalization events

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the incidence of and factors associated with major complications, delayed discharge, and emergency room (ER) visits or readmission after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) <3 cm in a recent cohort at a tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

A total of 188 patients with treatment-naïve single HCCs <3 cm who underwent RFA between January 2018 and April 2021 were included in the analysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with major complications, delayed discharge, and ER visits or readmission. Local tumor progression (LTP) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Major complications occurred in 3.2% (6/188) of the patients. The longest diameter of the ablation zone was significantly larger in patients with major complications (P=0.023). Delayed discharge occurred in 5.8% (9/188) of the patients, for which albumin-bilirubin grade 3 was identified as an important determinant. No variables other than major complications were significantly associated with ER visits or readmission, which occurred in 7.0% (13/188) of the patients. Major complications, delayed discharge, and ER visits or readmission were not substantially related to the post-treatment outcomes of LTP and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed RFA as a highly safe procedure for single HCCs <3 cm, despite the rapidly changing RFA techniques in the most recent cohort. A large ablation zone and poor liver function were predictors of major complications and delayed discharge, respectively.

Clinical feasibility of radiofrequency ablation using novel adjustable separable electrodes with a multipurpose needle for treating small hepatocellular carcinomas: a prospective single center study

BACKGROUND

The novel separable clustered electrode system with two adjustable active tips (ICAEs) and a fine multipurpose needle (MPN) for in situ temperature monitoring and adjuvant agent injection was developed and validated in an animal study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical efficacy and complication of the novel electrode system for patients who have small HCC.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center clinical trial, ten participants with 14 small (≤ 2 cm, BCLC 0-A) HCCs referred for RFA were enrolled. A novel electrode system consisting of two ICAEs and one MPN with a thermometer and side holes was used for RFA. The RF energy was delivered using a multichannel RF system combining bipolar and switching monopolar modes. Technical success, efficacy, and complications were evaluated on immediate and one-month follow-up CT.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 92.9% (13/14) of tumors. One participant withdrew consent after RFA, and technical efficacy was achieved in 91.7% (11/12) of tumors. None showed thermal injury to nontarget organs. All patients were discharged the day after RFA without major complications. The active electrode lengths were adjusted in 60% (6/10) of patients during the procedure to tailor the ablation zone (83.3%, n = 5) or treat two tumors with different sizes (16.7%, n = 1). MPN was capable of continuous temperature monitoring during all ablations (100%, 14/14).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA using a novel electrode system showed acceptable technical efficacy and safety in patients with small HCCs. Further comparative studies are needed for the investigation of the system's potential benefits compared to conventional electrodes.

Efficacy and safety of no-touch radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma-a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to report the efficacy and safety of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We systematically searched for eligible studies in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library until June 1, 2022. Random effect model was applied to synthesize the pooled proportions of local tumor progression-free survival (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) respectively, as well as adverse events, for small HCC treated by NT-RFA.

RESULTS

Of the 10 included studies, 3 of them reported local tumor recurrence. One reported local tumor recurrence at 19 months (range, 12-24), and 2 studies had no tumor recurrence with 24-months of follow-up. The 1- and 2-year LTP pooled proportions were 99.3% (95%CI, 97.5-100) and 97.8% (95%CI, 94.6-99.6) respectively, and two studies reported a 3-year LTP rate of 96.4% (204/212, 36/37). The 1-yearRFS rates was 91.3% (95%CI, 84.1-98.4), 2-year was 86.4% (95%CI, 75.3-97.5). The 1-, 2- and 3- year OS rates were 92.4% (95%CI, 82.8-92.7), 84.1% (95%CI, 74.7-93.6) and 81.8% (116/181, 33/36) respectively, and only one study reported a 5-year OS rate of 47.0% (85/181). The ablative success rate of the HCC nodules was 96.6% (95%CI, 91.3-99.5) and the proportions of mild and severe adverse events following ablation were 18.3% (95%CI, 8.1-41.6) and 5.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

NT-RFA provides safely very high rate of sustained local control for the treatment of HCC up to 5 cm.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Long‐term efficacy of no‐touch radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: A single center long‐term follow‐up study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) for treating single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) less than 3 cm.

METHODS

A total of 331 patients with HCC less than 3 cm undergoing RFA in Southwest Hospital from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into NT-RFA group (n = 113) and conventional RFA (C-RFA) group (n = 218). The survival rate, local tumor progression (LTP) and intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) of the two groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

A significant difference was observed in ablation range (p = 0.000) and safety margin (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 99.12%, 93.73%, 76.18%, 57.00%, 45.17% and 99.08%, 89.91%, 71.26%, 54.28%, 41.77%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.281). The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 78.51%, 52.59%, 41.02%, 34.36%, 30.92% and 68.81%, 44.95%, 30.88%, 23.73%, 22.88%, respectively. The two groups differed significantly (p = 0.044). The 1-, 3-and 5-year LTP-free survival rates in NT-RFA and C-RFA group were 87.12%, 74.99%, 72.32% and 75.75%, 65.52%, 65.52%, respectively. The two groups also differed significantly (p = 0.024). Furthermore, the RFS rates of D ≤ 2 cm subgroups in NT-RFA and C-RFA groups differed significantly (p = 0.037), while the RFS rates of 2 cm < D ≤ 3 cm subgroups in two groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.578).

CONCLUSIONS

The RFS rates of single HCC less than 3 cm treated by NT-RFA was significantly higher than that of C-RFA. Due to a larger ablation range and safety margin, NT-RFA could significantly reduce LTP and improve RFS. Dual-electrode NT-RFA can significantly improve the RFS rate of patients with HCC less than 2 cm, but there is no obvious advantage compared with C-RFA in the treatment of HCC over 2 cm.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the use, comparative efficacy, and research progress of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), alone or in combination with other therapies, for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

To search and summarize the basic and clinical studies of RFA in recent years.

RESULTS

RFA is one of the radical treatment methods listed in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. It has the characteristics of being minimally invasive and safe and can obtain good local tumor control, and it can improve the local immune ability, improve the tumor microenvironment and enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs. It is commonly used for HCC treatment before liver transplantation and combined ALPPS and hepatectomy for HCC. In addition, the technology of RFA is constantly developing. The birth of noninvasive, no-touch RFA technology and equipment and the precise RFA concept have improved the therapeutic effect of RFA.

CONCLUSION

RFA has good local tumor control ability, is minimally invasive, is safe and has other beneficial characteristics. It plays an increasingly important role in the comprehensive treatment strategy of HCC. Whether RFA alone or combined with other technologies expands the surgical indications of patients with HCC and provides more benefits for HCC patients needs to be determined.

Can "no-touch" radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma improve local tumor control? Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but local tumor progression (LTP) has been a main limitation of RFA. This study aims to evaluate the LTP of percutaneous no-touch RFA (NtRFA) for HCC ≤ 5 cm and compare with conventional RFA (intratumoral puncture) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies on percutaneous NtRFA for HCC ≤ 5 cm. The pooled proportions of the overall and cumulative incidence rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for LTP after NtRFA were assessed using a random-effects model. For studies comparing NtRFA with conventional RFA, relative risks (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) were meta-analytically pooled with LTP as the outcome.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 900 patients were included. The pooled overall rate of LTP after NtRFA was 6% (95% CI, 4-8%). The pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates of LTP were 3% (95% CI, 2-5%), 5% (95% CI, 3- 9%), and 8% (95% CI, 6-11%), respectively. Compared to conventional RFA, the pooled RR and HR of LTP were 0.26 (95% CI, 0.16-0.41) and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.11-0.70), respectively (both p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis including only randomized controlled studies also showed better local tumor control of NtRFA with HR of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.14-0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous NtRFA is an effective treatment for HCC ≤ 5 cm with an overall LTP rate of 6% and provides lower LTP compared with conventional RFA.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidence rates of local tumor progression after no-touch radiofrequency ablation for HCC ≤ 5 cm were 3% (95% CI, 2-5%), 5% (95% CI, 3-9%), and 8% (95% CI, 6-11%). • No-touch radiofrequency ablation had significantly lower rates of local tumor progression compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.41; p < 0.01, respectively).

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of solitary hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: Risk factors of local tumor progression-free survival and overall survival

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for solitary colorectal liver metastases (CLM) <3 cm and to identify the risk factors associated with poor LTPFS and OS after percutaneous RFA.

Methods

This study screened 219 patients who underwent percutaneous RFA for CLM between January 2013 and November 2020. Of these, 92 patients with a single CLM <3 cm were included. LTPFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between curves were compared using the log-rank test. Risk factors for LTPFS and OS were assessed using Cox proportional-hazard regression models.

Results

Technical efficacy was achieved in the first (n=91) or second (n=1) RFA sessions. During the follow-up (median, 20.0 months), cumulative LTPFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.4%, 83.4%, and 76.5%, respectively. During the follow-up (median, 27.8 months), the corresponding OS rates were 97.5%, 81.3%, and 74.8%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, the group with both tumor-puncturing RFA and a T4 stage primary tumor (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.2; P=0.037) had poor LTPFS. In the univariable analysis, no factors were significantly associated with poor OS.

Conclusion

Both LTPFS and OS were promising after percutaneous RFA for a single CLM <3 cm. The group with both tumor-puncturing RFA and a T4 stage primary tumor showed poor LTPFS. No risk factors were identified for poor OS.

Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

Background Recently introduced no-touch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has the potential to improve local tumor control. Purpose To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of monopolar no-touch RFA in single HCCs 2.5 cm or smaller. Materials and Methods In this multicenter clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03375281), participants were evaluated for eligibility from November 2017 to January 2019. Patients with single HCCs 2.5 cm or smaller planning to be treated with no-touch RFA were enrolled. The rate of successful no-touch RFA, defined as performing RFA without violation of the tumor itself, was recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine associated factors for failure of no-touch RFA. Development of major complication after no-touch RFA was also recorded. Cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) and recurrence-free survival were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 140 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 106 men) were evaluated. No-touch RFA was successfully performed in 128 participants (128 of 140; 91.4%), and conversion to tumor puncture RFA was undertaken in 12 participants because of the lack of a safe access route. By using either no-touch RFA or conversion to tumor puncture RFA, all participants achieved technical success of RFA, which was defined as complete coverage of target tumor by ablation zone. Insufficient peritumoral parenchyma (<5 mm width around more than half portion of tumor; odds ratio, 74; 95% CI: 18, 309; P < .001) was the only significant predictive factor for failure of the no-touch technique. Among the 140 participants, LTP developed in two participants, and the estimated 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of LTP was 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. The estimated 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival was 82.8% and 74.1%, respectively. Conclusion No-touch radiofrequency ablation was an effective and safe treatment method for small hepatocellular carcinomas (≤2.5 cm), with 1.6% of cumulative incidence of local tumor progression at 2 years. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Soulen and García-Mónaco in this issue.