Clinical Impact of the Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Outcomes in Patients with Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The Weight of Nutrition on Post-Resection Oncologic Morbidity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nutritional Indices

CONTEXT

Nutritional status is a critical factor in the selection of patients for solid tumor resection. A variety of indices have been developed to quantify nutritional status, and they have differing degrees of predictive power for various postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive ability of commonly used nutritional indices in relation to postoperative complications (POCs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review of 14 established nutritional indices from January 2015 to July 2022.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points were POCs and RFS. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed to further assess the predictive ability of these indices for OS based on general index type, primary tumor site, and the patient's index status.

DATA ANALYSIS

In this evaluation, 38 articles reporting data on 23 970 patients were analyzed, focusing on 14 nutritional indices. The indices were categorized into phenotypic, metabolic, immunologic, and combined types. Patients within the cut-off range of any index were predicted to have lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.84-2.49, P < .01). Lower gastrointestinal (GI) and "other" sites were less predictive than upper GI primary tumors (HR 1.63, HR 1.82, and HR 2.54, respectively; all with P < .01). Phenotypic indices were less predictive than combined indices (HR 1.73 vs HR 2.47, P < .01). Within the combined category, there was no significant difference in the predictive ability of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) vs Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) vs Controlling Nutritional Index (CONUT) (HR 2.63 vs HR 2.42 vs HR 2.07, P = .07).

CONCLUSION

The predictive efficacy of a nutritional index was found to be highly dependent on the index type, the primary tumor site, and the outcome of interest. In the context of upper GI resections, nutritional status appeared to be more of a significant predictor of OS, compared with cases involving lower GI and hepatic malignancies. Indices that integrate phenotypic, metabolic, and immunologic patient factors potentially offer greater clinical utility in forecasting OS.

Prognostic Nutrition Index as a Biomarker for Treatment Sensitivity to Chemotherapy and Nivolumab as the First-Line Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

This multicenter study aimed to determine whether the pretreatment prognostic nutrition index (PNI) or a change in the index after two treatment courses could be a biomarker for predicting treatment sensitivity in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer treated using chemotherapy and nivolumab as the first-line treatment.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study with 104 patients was conducted at 12 institutions. PNI was calculated before treatment and after two courses of treatment in each case. We also focused on changes in PNI from the pretreatment value.

RESULTS

After two courses of chemotherapy plus nivolumab treatment, the high PNI group had significantly better rates of overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0016) and time-to-treatment failure (p = 0.0060). Low PNI was an independent prognostic factor predicting both therapeutic sensitivity to chemotherapy plus nivolumab treatment and poorer OS. Furthermore, correlation with low pretreatment PNI transitioning to high after two courses of treatment was not noted in any patient in the progressive disease group (p = 0.0075).

CONCLUSIONS

PNI is a score composed of a patient's albumin level and lymphocyte count that can be easily assessed in daily clinical practice. Evaluating it is easy for each treatment; thus, when there is a focus on its transition, PNI could be a very powerful biomarker for predicting treatment sensitivity.

Predictive value of prognostic nutritional index in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in gastrectomy remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive value of PNI in patients undergoing gastrectomy for malignancy.

METHODS

We retrieved studies from medical literature databases to analyze the endpoints of overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and clinicopathologic features. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to access the survival prognostic value of PNI in patients after gastrectomy. Odds ratio and mean difference were used to evaluate the relationship between the low PNI and clinicopathologic features.

RESULTS

In total, we included 38 articles (39 trial comparisons) which contained 23,756 gastrectomy patients. The results showed that low PNI was associated with shorter overall survival (HR: 1.82, 95% CI 1.62-2.03), shorter cancer-specific survival (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.24-1.67), and shorter recurrence-free survival (HR: 2.52, 95% CI 1.41-4.47). Besides, patients with low PNI had a higher risk of postoperative complications compared with high PNI (HR: 1.65, 95% CI 1.30-2.09). And low PNI group was found to be related to older, lower BMI, larger tumor size, deeper tumor invasion, poorer differentiation, more advanced tumor stage, total gastrectomy, and the presence of lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and vessel invasion.

CONCLUSION

PNI was significantly associated with survival and postoperative complications of gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Therefore PNI has the potential to be a prognostic predictor for gastrectomy.

The Utility of Immuno-Nutritional Scores in Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Tumors

BACKGROUND

Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Score (HALP) is an accessible score that is easily reproducible from routine laboratory testing while also reflecting patients' immune-nutritional status. Along with other immuno-nutritional scores, such as the Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI), HALP has been associated with a number of clinical and pathological features. The goal of our study was to evaluate the prognostic utility of HALP and PNI scores in testicular germ cell cancer (GCT) patients.

METHODS

This case-only study included 203 testicular GCT patients who were classified according to the disease stage and HALP and PNI cut-offs. Complete blood count and albumin concentration were routinely determined.

RESULTS

The values of HALP and PNI significantly differed among different clinical stages (p < 0.05). Moreover, they clearly exposed a significantly higher risk of advanced clinical stage development for those testicular GCT patients with lower values of HALP and PNI (p < 0.05). Finally, lower score levels were associated with larger tumor size (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our investigation could provide evidence that specific immune-nutritional scores can help distinguish individuals diagnosed with testicular GCT who are more likely to be identified with advanced disease stages.

Combined preoperative prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer score predicts outcome in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and D-dimer (DD) levels represent useful prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, a combination of these indicators, namely, the PNI and DD score (PDS) was less addressed.

METHODS

A retrospective study with 183 patients after curative surgery was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: PDS 0, decreased PNI and increased DD levels; PDS 1, decreased or increased PNI and DD levels; PDS 2, increased PNI and decreased DD levels. The differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among these subgroups, and risk factors for outcome were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 56, 65 and 62 patients were assigned to the PDS 0, 1 and 2 subgroups, respectively. PDS was significant in predicting both the DFS (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.68, P < 0.001) and OS (AUC = 0.74, P < 0.001). PDS 0 patients were more likely to be associated with old age (P = 0.032), laparotomy (P < 0.001), elevated CEA (P = 0.001), T3 + T4 (P = 0.001) and advanced TNM stage (P = 0.031). PDS 0 patients had significantly inferior DFS (log rank = 18.35, P < 0.001) and OS (log rank = 28.34, P < 0.001) than PDS 1 or 2 patients. PDS was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (PDS 1: HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-1.00, P = 0.049; PDS 2: HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.79, P = 0.009) and OS (PDS 1: HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.88, P = 0.020; PDS 2: HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.45, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PDS is a useful prognostic indicator for CRC patients after curative surgery, and PDS 0 patients have inferior survival. Additional future studies are needed to validate these findings.

Re-do laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy for anastomotic stenosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Anastomotic stenosis of esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy has a substantial impact on the postoperative quality of life of the patient. If conservative treatment doesn't work, surgical intervention should be considered. However, redoing esophagojejunostomy is an extremely demanding procedure. Especially in the case where the primary surgery was performed laparoscopically, it is an unmet problem to maintain minimal invasiveness in re-do surgery.

METHODS

We report 3 cases of re-do esophagojejunostomy laparoscopically performed for anastomotic stenosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer, in whom endoscopic balloon dilation did not work.

RESULTS

Each patient underwent a re-do esophagojejunostomy laparoscopically. The mean operation time was 293 min, and the mean blood loss was 56 ml. There was no anastomosis-related complication, and they were discharged from hospital on 11-16 postoperative days. At the time of discharge, oral food intake was 100% in each patient. One year after the operation, follow-up endoscopic exams showed no anastomotic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Re-do laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy for anastomotic stenosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy was safely and successfully performed. It brings patients minimal invasiveness continuously from the initial surgery. Re-do laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy could be one of the options for anastomotic stenosis resistant to conservative treatment.

Nutritional Predictors of Wound Infection in Patients with Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) frequently requires high-risk surgery that predisposes patients to complex wounds. Past studies have identified a variety of tumor characteristics as risk factors for wound infection (WI); however, physiologic characteristics have not yet been studied in this population. Thus, the objective of this study is to identify any nutritional indicators and physiologic characteristics associated with the development of WI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

633 patients from a large tertiary care center institution were identified with lower extremity STS removed from 1992 to 2017. The primary outcomes of interest were WI at patient's surgical site within 90 days of surgery and additional procedure due to wound infection. Patients' laboratory values, comorbidities, and other characteristics were assessed using multivariable analysis to determine risk factors for WI. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used for analysis of plasma glucose and albumin levels to determine a useful risk threshold. Significance was determined to be p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Postoperative plasma glucose levels were significantly higher among patients with WI compared with those without (p < 0.001) and showed predictivity in ROC analysis (AUC 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82). Preoperative albumin (p < 0.001) and prognostic nutritional index score (p = 0.002) were significantly lower among patients with WI. Partial thromboplastin time (PTT), international normalized ratio (INR), white blood cell count (WBC), and platelet count values had no effect on WI. Smoking elevated risk for WI (OR 1.64, p < 0.01). Significant risk factors were the same when assessed for those with WI undergoing additional procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative plasma glucose levels, preoperative albumin levels, and smoking status are useful nutritional variables in predicting WI in STS excisional procedures.