Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: 2021 Update

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with the FOLFOX regimen for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and literature review

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of primary liver cancer (PLC) has experienced a significant global increase, primarily attributed to the rise in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, HCC is often diagnosed in advanced stages, leaving patients with limited treatment options. Therefore, transformation therapy is a crucial approach for long-term survival and radical resection in patients with advanced HCC. Conversion therapy has demonstrated promise in the treatment of advanced HCC. When integrated with the FOLFOX regimen, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can significantly improve tumor response efficiency, leading to high conversion and resection rates.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed landmark trials of HAIC in combination with different drugs or means for the treatment of HCC to determine the clinical value of HAIC-centric translational therapies in HCC treatment. Furthermore, we specifically emphasize the advantages associated with employing FOLFOX-HAIC in the treatment of advanced HCC.

EXPERT OPINION

The combination of HAIC with the FOLFOX regimen can help prevent the low intratumoral accumulation and high adverse reaction rate caused by the FOLFOX alone, holding significant potential in the comprehensive treatment of future HCC patients.

Geographic disparities in access to liver transplant for advanced cirrhosis: Time to ring the alarm!

Decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer are major risk factors for mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT), both live-donor LT or deceased-donor LT, are lifesaving, but there are several barriers toward equitable access. These barriers are exacerbated in the setting of critical illness or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Rates of LT vary widely worldwide but are lowest in lower-income countries owing to lack of resources, infrastructure, late disease presentation, and limited donor awareness. A recent experience by the Chronic Liver Disease Evolution and Registry for Events and Decompensation consortium defined these barriers toward LT as critical in determining overall survival in hospitalized cirrhosis patients. A major focus should be on appropriate, affordable, and early cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer care to prevent the need for LT. Live-donor LT is predominant across Asian countries, whereas deceased-donor LT is more common in Western countries; both approaches have unique challenges that add to the access disparities. There are many challenges toward equitable access but uniform definitions of acute-on-chronic liver failure, improving transplant expertise, enhancing availability of resources and encouraging knowledge between centers, and preventing disease progression are critical to reduce LT disparities.

The Impact of Sequential Therapies after First-Line Systemic Therapies in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: The therapeutic options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have greatly expanded recently, and current first-line therapies include sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab-bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of sequential systemic treatments after progressing to the first-line agent in patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: Data were collected from subjects with HCC, BCLC stage B or C, who received first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab from September 2020 to December 2022. The patients who progressed after first-line therapy were evaluated according to individual clinical status in order to decide whether or not to accept sequential therapy. The clinical baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of enrolled patients were collected and further analyzed. Results: Among the 127 enrolled patients, percentage of sequential therapy was 67.9%, 21.6%, and 37.5% in those with tumor progression after first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, or atezolizumab-bevacizumab, respectively. Acceptance of sequential therapy (HR 0.46, p = 0.041) and presentation of ALBI grade I (HR 0.36, p = 0.002) had a significantly positive impact on OS. Pre-treatment ALBI grade had a significant impact on the decision to accept sequential therapy in patients with progressed HCC. Conclusions: The patients who were able to undergo sequential therapy had a better survival outcome compared to those who received only one agent, and the pre-treatment ALBI level might be regarded as a cornerstone tool to assess survival outcomes in patients undergoing treatment for HCC.

Survival Improvements in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Sequential Therapy by Era

Treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have changed dramatically, with systemic therapy as the primary option. However, the effect of sequential treatment on prognosis remains unclear. This retrospective study included patients who began systemic therapy between 2009 and 2022. The patients were separated into three groups according to systemic therapy commencement. The number of therapy lines, treatment efficacy, and overall survival (OS) were compared. Multivariate analyses of the prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Overall, 336 patients were included (period 1: 2009-2013, n = 86; period 2: 2014-2018, n = 132; period 3: 2019-2022, n = 118). A significant etiological trend was observed with decreasing viral hepatitis-related HCC and increasing non-viral hepatitis-related HCC. Across periods 1-3, the proportion of patients who were administered >2 lines progressively increased (1.2%, 12.9%, and 17.0%, respectively; p < 0.001) and the median OS was significantly prolonged (14.3, 16.8, and 31.0 months; p < 0.001). The use of <3 lines, the non-complete and partial response of the first line, modified albumin-bilirubin at grade 2b or 3, an intrahepatic tumor number ≥ 5, extrahepatic metastasis, and alpha-fetoprotein at ≥400 ng/mL were the strongest factors associated with shorter OS. Sequential therapies have contributed to significant improvements in HCC prognosis, suggesting that sequential treatment post-progression is worthwhile for better survival.

Clinicopathological characteristics and molecular analysis of lymphocyte-rich hepatocellular carcinoma

Lymphocyte-rich hepatocellular carcinoma (LR-HCC), a newly proposed subtype of HCC, is characterized with abundant lymphocyte infiltration in the tumor. LR-HCC has a relatively good prognosis and is quite rare (<1% of all HCC). We examined LR-HCC clinicopathological and molecular characteristics by analyzing 451 surgically resected HCC cases without any prior treatment history at our hospital between 2012 and 2021. Clinicopathological features of LR-HCC and other HCCs (non-LR-HCC) were compared. Neoplastic and nonneoplastic hepatocytes from LR-HCC (n = 4) were collected with a laser microdissection system; RNA was extracted, followed by microarray analysis to examine lymphocytic infiltration-related molecular targets. Immunohistochemical staining of identified molecular target was performed in LR-HCC and non-LR-HCC. CD3, CD20, and CD8 immunostaining was also performed in LR-HCCs. There were 28 cases of LR-HCC (6%). No statistically significant differences were found in clinicopathological features, except for gross type, between LR-HCC and non-LR-HCC cases. The LR-HCC 5-year survival rate was >90%. Microarray analysis revealed high CCL20 expression in LR-HCC cases; immunohistochemical study showed significantly higher CCL20 expression in LR-HCC (P < 0.01) than in non-LR-HCC. CCR6, the only CCL20 receptor, was observed in infiltrating lymphocytes and HCC cells in LR-HCC. There were significantly more CD3-positive cells than CD20-positive cells (P < 0.0001) in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, most of which were CD8-positive T cells. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between LR-HCC and non-LR-HCC, except for gross and LR microscopic features. CCL20 expression in LR-HCC may contribute to infiltration of large numbers of CD8-positive lymphocytes.

Report of the 23rd nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan (2014-2015)

For the 23rd Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan, data from 20 889 newly registered patients and 42 274 previously registered follow-up patients were compiled from 516 institutions over a 2-year period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015. Basic statistics compiled for patients newly registered in the 23rd survey were cause of death, past medical history, clinical diagnosis, imaging diagnosis, treatment-related factors, pathological diagnosis, recurrence status, and autopsy findings. Compared with the previous 22nd survey, the population of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was older at the time of clinical diagnosis, had more female patients, had more patients with non-B non-C HCC, had smaller tumor diameter, and was more frequently treated with hepatectomy. Cumulative survival rates were calculated for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) by treatment type and background characteristics for patients newly registered between 2004 and 2015 whose final outcome was survival or death. The median overall survival and cumulative survival rates for HCC were calculated by dividing patients by combinations of background factors (number of tumors, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh grade, or albumin-bilirubin grade) and by treatment type (hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and systemic therapy). The same values were also calculated according to registration date by dividing patients newly registered between 1978 and 2015 into five time period groups. The data obtained from this nationwide follow-up survey are expected to contribute to advancing clinical research and treatment of primary liver cancer in the world.

Serial increase and high alpha-fetoprotein levels predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in 6 months

AIM

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) checkup with abdominal ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance remains controversial. We evaluated a serial AFP-increase and high AFP levels in the prediction of HCC.

METHODS

At-risk patients with chronic liver disease underwent HCC surveillance with trimonthly AFP measurement were included and categorized into HCC and non-HCC groups. Their AFP levels at 12, 9, and 6 months (-6M) before the outcome date were evaluated. Group-based trajectory analysis and multivariable regression analysis were performed to identify AFP trajectories as risk predictors for HCC.

RESULTS

Overall, 2776 patients were included in the HCC (n = 326) and non-HCC (n = 2450) groups. Serial AFP levels were significantly higher in the HCC than the non-HCC groups. Trajectory analysis identified AFP-increase group (11%) increased 24-fold risks of HCC compared with the AFP-stable (89%) group. Compared with patients without the AFP-increase, a serial 3-month AFP-increase ≥10% elevated HCC risk by 12.1-fold (95% CI: 6.5-22.4) in 6 months, and the HCC risks increased 13-60 fold in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B, or C receiving antiviral therapy, or AFP levels <20 ng/ml. Combining serial AFP-increase ≥10% and AFP ≥20 ng/ml at -6M significantly increased 41.7-fold (95% CI: 13.8-126.2) HCC risks. In patients who underwent biannual AFP checkups, those with both 6-month AFP-increase ≥10% and AFP ≥20 ng/ml increased 22.1-fold (95% CI: 12.52-39.16) HCC risks in 6 months. Most HCCs were detected at an early stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial 3-6-month AFP-increase of ≥10% previously and AFP level of ≥20 ng/ml significantly increased HCC risks in 6 months.

Clinical role of radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in an advanced aging society

AIM

It is unclear whether prognosis differs by age for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to examine prognosis and recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early-stage HCC and to determine its prognostic factors for different age groups.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 1079 patients with initial early-stage HCC treated with RFA at two institutions. All patients in this study were divided into four groups: <70 years old (group1, n = 483), 70-74 years old (group2, n = 198), 75-79 years old (group3, n = 201), and ≥80 years old (group4, n = 197). Prognostic factors were evaluated by comparing survival and recurrence rates between each group.

RESULTS

The median survival time and 5-year survival rates for each group were 113 months and 70.8% in group1, 99.2 months and 71.5% in group2, 91.3 months and 66.5% in group3, and 71 months and 52.6% in group 4, respectively. Group4 had a significantly shorter survival than the other groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrence-free survival among the groups. In group4, the most common cause of death was nonliver-related disease (69.4%). In all groups, modified albumin-bilirubin index grade was a factor contributing to prolonged prognosis, but only in group4 performance status (PS) was a significant factor (hazard ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.00; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

For early-stage HCC in the elderly, preoperative evaluation of PS and management of other diseases could contribute to a prolonged prognosis.

Comparing Survival Outcomes of Patients With LI-RADS-M Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

There is a sparsity of data evaluating outcomes of patients with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) (LR)-M lesions.

PURPOSE

To compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) meeting LR-M criteria and to evaluate factors associated with prognosis.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Patients at risk for HCC with at least one LR-M lesion with histologic diagnosis, from 8 academic centers, yielding 120 patients with 120 LR-M lesions (84 men [mean age 62 years] and 36 women [mean age 66 years]).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5 and 3.0 T/3D T₁ -weighted gradient echo, T₂ -weighted fast spin-echo.

ASSESSMENT

The imaging categorization of each lesion as LR-M was made clinically by a single radiologist at each site and patient outcome measures were collected.

STATISTICAL TESTS

OS, PFS, and potential independent predictors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients with 120 LR-M lesions were included; on histology 65 were HCC and 55 were iCCA. There was similar median OS for patients with LR-M HCC compared to patients with iCCA (738 days vs. 769 days, P = 0.576). There were no significant differences between patients with HCC and iCCA in terms of sex (47:18 vs. 37:18, P = 0.549), age (63.0 ± 8.4 vs. 63.4 ± 7.8, P = 0.847), etiology of liver disease (P = 0.202), presence of cirrhosis (100% vs. 100%, P = 1.000), tumor size (4.73 ± 3.28 vs. 4.75 ± 2.58, P = 0.980), method of lesion histologic diagnosis (P = 0.646), and proportion of patients who underwent locoregional therapy (60.0% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.100) or surgery (134.8 ± 165.5 vs. 142.5 ± 205.6, P = 0.913). Using multivariable analysis, nonsurgical compared to surgical management (HR, 4.58), larger tumor size (HR, 1.19), and higher MELD score (HR, 1.12) were independently associated with worse OS.

DATA CONCLUSION

There was similar OS in patients with LR-M HCC and LR-M iCCA, suggesting that LR-M imaging features may more closely reflect patient outcomes than histology.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who are 70 years or older

Background

Although liver transplantation has been done successfully in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, these are likely well-selected patients. This study uses a large database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma to explore treatment and potential candidacy for liver transplantation in the elderly.

Methods

Retrospective review of 1,533 hepatocellular carcinoma cases identified 2 groups: 475 patients 70 years or older (70 +) and 1,058 patients < 70 years. Demographics, risk factors, tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival were compared. Three- and 5-year survival rates were determined, and logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of 3-year survival.

Results

Patients 70 + were more likely to have metabolic factors and less likely to have viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma found with surveillance (21.7% vs 28.4%, P = .005), and hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria (37.3% vs 43.8%, P = .019). Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was similar, but patients 70 + had higher mean creatinine and lower mean bilirubin. Patients 70 + were equally likely to undergo liver resection but less likely to undergo liver transplantation (0.4% vs 10.2%, P < .001). Three- and 5-year survival rates were significantly worse in 70 +, and predictors of 3-year survival included hepatocellular carcinoma found with surveillance, meeting Milan criteria, and normal alpha fetoprotein.

Discussion

Elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were less likely to undergo liver transplantation potentially due to metabolic factors and advanced disease. Although there is no age cutoff for liver transplantation, elderly patients should be given realistic expectations of liver transplantation candidacy. Continued surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients may allow for earlier diagnosis and improved liver transplantation candidacy.

Key Message

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who are 70 years or older can be managed with liver transplantation in select cases, but more patients will be managed with liver resection and nonoperative therapies.

•

Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are older than 70 years will not undergo liver transplant.

•

Older patients are more likely to have metabolic risk factors and comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

•

Older patients have similar Model for End-stage Liver Disease score as younger patients; their scores are based on having more renal dysfunction and a lower bilirubin.

•

Older patients are less likely to have their hepatocellular carcinoma found with surveillance and are more likely to have cancer that is beyond Milan criteria which are generally used for transplant candidacy.

The prognosis of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center 19-year experience in Japan

AIMS

This retrospective study compared the survival between elderly and non-elderly patients.

METHODS

A total of 5545 treatment-naive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who visited 7 different hospitals from January 2000 to December 2018 were included. Patients ≥80 years old were defined as elderly patients. We divided the patients into three groups based on the timing of the initial treatment: Early, middle, and late periods defined as 2000 to 2005, 2006 to 2012, and 2013 to 2018, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 132 (8.9%), 405 (17.5%), and 388 (22.2%) elderly patients in the early, middle, and late period, respectively, showing a significant increase over time (p < 0.001). In both elderly and non-elderly patients, the median albumin-bilirubin score significantly improved over time and the diagnosis of HCC was made slightly earlier over time. The median overall survival (OS) in elderly patients was 52.8, 42.0, and 45.6 months in the early, middle, and late period, respectively, without a significant improvement (p = 0.17) whereas the OS in non-elderly patients was significantly improved (p < 0.001). The percentage of elderly patients receiving curative treatments did not significantly increase (p = 0.43), while that of non-elderly patients did (p = 0.017). Non-liver-related death in elderly patients significantly differed among periods (p = 0.023), while liver-related death did not (p = 0.050). Liver- and non-liver-related death in non-elderly patients significantly differed among periods (p < 0.001, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival in elderly patients was not improved despite an improvement in their liver function. Curative treatments should be conducted when appropriate after evaluating each elderly patient.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter analysis

Aim

The safety and efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) in elderly patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been sufficiently investigated.

Methods

A total of 317 patients with HCC treated with Atez/Bev were studied. We compared the survival and frequency of adverse events in elderly versus non‐elderly patients with HCC who were treated with Atez/Bev using an analysis of inverse probability weighting (IPW).

Results

Univariate analysis adjusted with IPW showed that being elderly is not associated with worse overall or progression‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.239; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.640–2.399; p = 0.526 and HR, 1.256; 95% CI, 0.871–1.811; p = 0.223, respectively). Regarding treatment‐related adverse events, any grade of fatigue, proteinuria, decreased appetite, hypertension, and liver injury occurred in ≥10% of patients. There were no significant differences in treatment‐related adverse events between the elderly and non‐elderly groups. In a subgroup analysis of elderly patients aged 75–79, 80–84, or ≥ 85 years, there were no significant differences in cumulative overall or progression‐free survival among these age groups (p = 0.960 and 0.566, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in treatment‐related adverse events among these three age groups, except for proteinuria of any grade. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with Atez/Bev as first‐line systemic therapy, there were no significant differences in cumulative overall or progression‐free survival between the elderly and non‐elderly groups (p = 0.728 and 0.805, respectively).

Conclusions

Atez/Bev can be used efficaciously and safely in spite of age in patients with unresectable HCC.

Comparison of Mortality Rates in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplant and Patients With Colorectal Metastatic Tumors

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify outcomes of liver surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer, which result in primary and secondary liver tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 51 patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases and 63 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were prepared for liver transplant due to cirrhosis who underwent hepatic resection or local ablation treatments; patients were seen between January 2011 and December 2021.

RESULTS

Most patients with colorectal cancer were men (58.8%). Mean age was 65.76 ± 13.818 years (range, 27-88 y). Most patients had planned, elective surgery (86.3%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 58.8% of patients. The most common location of metastasis in the liver was in the right lobe (43.1%), and the most common surgery was low anterior resection (17 patients). During simultaneous liver surgery, 31 patients required metastasectomy and 7 patients required radiofrequency ablation plus metastasectomy. No deaths occurred in the early posttransplant period, and cumulative survival was 82.624 ± 7.962 months. Disease-free survival was 45.2 ± 7.495 months. Most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were men (82.5%). Mean age was 58.73 ± 17.428 years. Hepatocellular carcinoma lesions were mostly located in both the right and left lobes (23.8%). In the hepatocellular cancer group, 60.3% had transarterial chemoembolization and 42.9% had radiofrequency ablation. The primary surgical resection was metastasectomy (17.9%) because of multiple localized lesions. Median follow-up was 22 months (range, 1-126 mo). Overall survival was 101.898 ± 7.169 months, with 10-year overall survival of 38%. Disease-free survival was 74.081 ± 8.732 months, with 1-year and 5-year disease-free survival of 90.5% and 54%.

CONCLUSIONS

Better survival was shown in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma than in patients with colorectal cancer.Therefore, more aggressive treatment options, as used in hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplant, may be options for patients with colorectal cancer.

Objective Response by mRECIST to Initial Lenvatinib Therapy Is an Independent Factor Contributing to Deep Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib-Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Sequential Therapy

OBJECTIVE

There is limited information regarding the benefits of Lenvatinib-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE) sequential therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). We compared the efficacy and safety of LEN-TACE sequential therapy to LEN monotherapy and investigated the factors contributing to the LEN-TACE sequential therapy deep response.

METHODS

We enrolled a multicenter cohort of 247 patients with u-HCC treated with LEN between 2018 and 2020. Propensity score matching identified 63 matching pairs of patients with well-balanced characteristics. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and incidence of adverse events (AEs), between the LEN-TACE and LEN monotherapy groups. Additionally, we evaluated the tumor response, change in albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, factors affecting PFS and OS, and independent predictors contributing to the LEN-TACE sequential therapy deep response. In this study, at eight weeks after resumption of LEN after initial TACE, "deep response" was defined as achieving complete response or partial response (PR) on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking the baseline sum diameters as the reference.

RESULTS

The OS and PFS in the LEN-TACE group were significantly higher than those in the LEN monotherapy group (p = 0.002 and p = 0.037, respectively). The incidence of AEs related to LEN was not significantly different between the two groups. In LEN-TACE sequential therapy, the objective response rate was 61.9%, and the disease control rate was 74.6%, according to the mRECIST criteria. No significant change in the ALBI score was observed during sequential LEN-TACE therapy. Multivariable analyses revealed that deep response was independently associated with the outcome of the initial response to LEN by mRECIST: PR (odds ratio: 5.176, 95% confidence interval: 1.528-17.537, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LEN-TACE sequential therapy may provide more clinical benefits than LEN monotherapy in u-HCC patients who responded to initial LEN treatment. Objective response according to mRECIST to initial LEN is an independent factor contributing to LEN-TACE sequential therapy deep response.