The Impact of Languages and Cultural Backgrounds on Voice Quality Analyses

Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed - CPPS and Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI in healthy and altered children's voices: comparation, relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment and cut-off points

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) of children with normal and altered voices, to relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment (APJ) and to establish cut-off points.

METHODS

Vocal recordings of the sustained vowel and number counting tasks of 185 children were selected from a database and submitted to acoustic analysis with extraction of CPPS and AVQI measurements, and to APJ. The APJ was performed individually for each task, classified as normal or altered, and for the tasks together defining whether the child would pass or fail in a situation of vocal screening.

RESULTS

Children with altered APJ and who failed the screening had lower CPPS values and higher AVQI values, than those with normal APJ and who passed the screening. The APJ of the sustained vowel task was related to CPPS and AVQI, and APJ of the number counting task was related only to AVQI and CPPS numbers. The cut-off points that differentiate children with and without vocal deviation are 14.07 for the vowel CPPS, 7.62 for the CPPS numbers and 2.01 for the AVQI.

CONCLUSION

Children with altered voices, have higher AVQI values and lower CPPS values, when detected in children with voices within the normal range. The acoustic measurements were related to the auditory perceptual judgment of vocal quality in the sustained vowel task, however, the number counting task was related only to the AVQI and CPPS. The cut-off points that differentiate children with and without vocal deviation are 14.07 for the CPPS vowel, 7.62 for the CPPS numbers and 2.01 for the AVQI. The three measures were similar in identifying voices without deviation and dysphonic voices.

The Impact of Foreign Language Accent on Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Evaluations of Dysphonia

INTRODUCTION

Auditory-perceptual evaluations of dysphonia, though essential for comprehensive voice evaluation, are subject to listener bias. Knowledge of an underlying voice disorder can influence auditory-perceptual ratings. Accented speech results in increased listener effort and delays in word identification. Yet, little is known about the impact of foreign language accents on auditory-perceptual ratings for dysphonic speakers. The purpose of this work was to determine the impact of a foreign language accent on experts' auditory-perceptual ratings of dysphonic speakers.

METHODS

Twelve voice-specializing SLPs who spoke with a General American English (GAE) accent rated vocal percepts of 28 speakers with a foreign language accent and 28 with a GAE accent, all of whom had been diagnosed with a voice disorder. Speaker groups were matched based on sex, age, and mean smoothed cepstral peak prominence. Four linear mixed-effects models assessed the impact of a foreign language accent on expert auditory-perceptual ratings of the overall severity of dysphonia, roughness, breathiness, and strain.

RESULTS

The twelve raters demonstrated good inter- and intra-rater reliability (ICC[3, k] = .89; mean ICC = .89). The linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant impact of foreign language accent on ratings of overall severity of dysphonia, roughness, breathiness, or strain.

CONCLUSION

Despite the possibility of increased listener effort and bias, foreign language accent incongruence had no effect on expert listeners' auditory-perceptual evaluations for dysphonic speakers. Findings support the use of auditory-perceptual evaluations for voice disorders across sociolinguistically diverse populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:2272-2276, 2024.

Effect of Anchor Voices and Listener Expertise on Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Voice Quality Using the GRBAS Scale

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the effect of anchor voices and listener expertise on auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality using the GRBAS scale.

METHODS

This study utilized a modified crossover design with counterbalancing. Anchor voices for each parameter of the GRBAS scale were chosen based on expert consensus. A total of 28 participants were divided into three groups based on their expertise. The first and second groups consisted of nine undergraduate (UG) and nine postgraduate (PG) students of speech-language pathology. The third group consisted of 10 practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs). These participants carried out auditory-perceptual judgment of 60 dysphonic voice samples under two counterbalanced experimental conditions (with and without anchor voices). Each of the three groups was randomly divided into two subgroups to balance the experimental conditions. Interrater reliability for each subgroup was calculated using Krippendorff's α and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

For all the groups involved in the study, interrater reliability was higher when anchor voices aided perceptual judgment for most parameters of the GRBAS scale. For the different parameters of GRBAS, interrater reliability for the UG group varied from fair (20 < α ≤ 40) to moderate (40 < α ≤ 60). In contrast, it was fair (20 < α ≤ 40) to substantial (60 < α ≤ 80) for the PG group and moderate (40 < α ≤ 60) to substantial (60 < α ≤ 80) for the SLP group. Variations in reliability were the least for the SLP group compared to the UG and PG groups. However, there were overlaps in interrater reliability between the groups, as revealed by the 95% confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Anchor voices help improve the auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality, especially interrater reliability. Listener expertise is also shown to influence the interrater reliability of auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.

Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) at pre- and post-voice therapy times.

METHODS

This is a before and after intervention study, with retrospective data collection. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 49.9 years participated in the study. The vocal therapy occurred between the years 2016 to 2019 in a teaching clinic, and the subjects had vocal samples collected before and after the therapeutic processes. CPPS and AVQI data extractions were performed during pre- and post-therapy. In order to characterize the sample, auditory-perceptual evaluation (APE) regarding the overall degree of vocal deviation at pre- and post-therapy moments was performed. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The APE data indicated a decrease in the median values of overall vocal deviation degree at the post-therapy stage for both the vowel (p=0.00) and number (p=0.00) samples. The average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pre-therapy and 16.37 post-therapy (p=0.01); for the number emission, it was 8.22 pre-therapy and 9.06 post-therapy (p=0.02), there was a difference in the CPPS of the vowel and numbers indicating vocal improvement at post-therapy. The average AVQI was 2.27 pre-therapy and 1.54 post-therapy (p=0.05). There was an improvement in the AVQI results, with borderline p-value.

CONCLUSION

Vocal therapy produced changes in the general degree of vocal deviation, as well as in CPPS and AVQI measurements, and the results at the post-therapy moment are similar to those of vocally healthy individuals.

Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy

PURPOSE

To compare the acoustic measurements of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed (CPPS) and Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) at pre- and post-voice therapy times.

METHODS

This is a before and after intervention study, with retrospective data collection. Twenty-two subjects with a mean age of 49.9 years participated in the study. The vocal therapy occurred between the years 2016 to 2019 in a teaching clinic, and the subjects had vocal samples collected before and after the therapeutic processes. CPPS and AVQI data extractions were performed during pre- and post-therapy. In order to characterize the sample, auditory-perceptual evaluation (APE) regarding the overall degree of vocal deviation at pre- and post-therapy moments was performed. The data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The APE data indicated a decrease in the median values of overall vocal deviation degree at the post-therapy stage for both the vowel (p=0.00) and number (p=0.00) samples. The average CPPS for the vowel was 14.53 pre-therapy and 16.37 post-therapy (p=0.01); for the number emission, it was 8.22 pre-therapy and 9.06 post-therapy (p=0.02), there was a difference in the CPPS of the vowel and numbers indicating vocal improvement at post-therapy. The average AVQI was 2.27 pre-therapy and 1.54 post-therapy (p=0.05). There was an improvement in the AVQI results, with borderline p-value.

CONCLUSION

Vocal therapy produced changes in the general degree of vocal deviation, as well as in CPPS and AVQI measurements, and the results at the post-therapy moment are similar to those of vocally healthy individuals.

The cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, the acoustic voice quality index and the acoustic breathiness index as novel multiparametric indices for acoustic assessment of voice quality

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective assessment of voice quality using acoustic measures is an important pillar of voice diagnostics. This article reviews three recent acoustic measures and their clinical use in phoniatrics and laryngology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two acoustic parameters, the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) and the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI), have gained importance as validated multiparametric indices in the objective assessment of hoarseness because they include both continuous speech and sustained vowels. The acoustic breathiness index (ABI), another multiparametric index, assesses breathiness admixture during phonation and identifies it robustly, unaffected by other characteristics of dysphonia such as roughness.

SUMMARY

Acoustic measurements are useful diagnostic tools when used correctly with an appropriate recording system, consideration of environment and use of software programs. CSID, AVQI and ABI objectively improve the detection of voice quality abnormalities. In addition to their proven validity, their application is simple and their usability for clinicians is high.