Rivaroxaban differentially influences ex vivo global coagulation assays based on the administration time

International council for standardisation in haematology recommendations on fibrinogen assays, thrombin clotting time and related tests in the investigation of bleeding disorders

This guidance was prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) by an international working group of clinicians and scientists. The document focuses on tests and assays used for the assessment of fibrinogen function, particularly in the scenario of bleeding disorders. Thrombin clotting time (TT) is used as a screening test in some laboratories and also has some utility when direct anticoagulants are in use. The Clauss fibrinogen assay remains the method of choice for the assessment of fibrinogen function, but there are some situations where the results may be misleading. Prothrombin time derived fibrinogen assays are frequently used, but should be interpreted with caution; the results are not interchangeable between different methods and fibrinogen can be overestimated in certain clinical scenarios. Viscoelastic point of care methods may be helpful in emergency situations, while Reptilase time (and similar tests) are useful combined with TT in distinguishing heparin contamination of samples (i.e., if an incorrect blood draw is suspected) and the presence of direct thrombin inhibitors. Fibrinogen antigen assays should be used in the investigation of functional fibrinogen abnormalities; fibrinogen antigen and genetic testing are recommended in the confirmation of congenital fibrinogen disorders. The following recommendations for fibrinogen function assessment are based on published literature and expert opinion and should supplement local regulations and standards.

Inherited Thrombophilia in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Severe inherited thrombophilia includes rare deficiencies of natural anticoagulants (antithrombin and proteins C and S) and homozygous or combined factor V Leiden and FII G20210A variants. They are associated with a high thrombosis risk and can impact the duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with a venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. Therefore, it is important to diagnose thrombophilia and to use adapted anticoagulant therapy. The widespread use of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) for VTE has raised new issues concerning inherited thrombophilia. Concerning inherited thrombophilia diagnosis, DOACs are directed toward either FIIa or FXa and can therefore interfere with coagulation assays. This paper reports DOAC interference in several thrombophilia tests, including the assessment of antithrombin, protein S, and protein C activities. Antithrombin activity and clot-based assays used for proteins C and S can be overestimated, with a risk of missing a deficiency. The use of a device to remove DOACs should be considered to minimize the risk of false-negative results. The place of DOACs in the treatment of VTE in thrombophilia patients is also discussed. Available data are encouraging, but given the variability in thrombosis risk within natural anticoagulant deficiencies, evidence in patients with well-characterized thrombophilia would be useful.

Effect on Plasma Protein S Activity in Patients Receiving the Factor Xa Inhibitors

AIMS

Measurement of protein S (PS) activity in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) using reagents based on a clotting assay results in falsely high PS activity, thus masking inherited PS deficiency, which is most frequently seen in the Japanese population. In this study, we investigated the effect of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors on PS activity using the reagent on the basis of the chromogenic assay, which was recently developed in Japan.

METHODS

The study enrolled 152 patients (82 males and 70 females; the average age: 68.5±14.0 years) receiving three FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban). PS activity was measured using the reagents on the basis of the clotting and chromogenic assays.

RESULTS

PS activity measured by the clotting assay reagents exhibited falsely high values depending on the plasma concentrations of FXa inhibitors in patients taking either rivaroxaban or edoxaban. However, none of the three FXa inhibitors affected PS activity when measured using the chromogenic assay.

CONCLUSION

In patients taking rivaroxaban or edoxaban, inherited PS deficiency is likely missed because the levels of PS activity measured using the reagents based on the clotting assay are falsely high. However, we report that three FXa inhibitors do not affect PS activity measured by the chromogenic assay. When measuring the levels of PS activity in patients undergoing DOACs, the principles of each reagent should be understood. Furthermore, plasma samples must be collected at the time when plasma concentrations of DOACs are lowest or the DOAC-Stop reagent should be used.

Direct oral anticoagulants in point-of-care monitoring: an ex-vivo study

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulatory activity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is not routinely measurable by point-of-care monitoring. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of dabigatran/rivaroxaban on point-of-care testing.

METHODS

Samples from 34 participants under DOAC therapy were drawn at two time points. Before ingestion and two-to-three hours afterwards. Thrombelastometric (ROTEM) and aggregometric (Multiplate) measurements were performed. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban plasma levels were determined.

RESULTS

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban plasma levels showed significant correlations with clotting time (CT) in EXTEM (r=0.765, P<0.0001; r=0.689, P<0.0001) and INTEM (r=0.792, P<0.0001; r=0.595, P<0.001). A positive correlation was identified between dabigatran ingestion and maximum-clot-firmness (MCF) (r=0.354, P<0.05) in the EXTEM test, pronounced in the absence of concomitant antiplatelet therapy (r=0.709, P<0.05). EXTEM-MCF positively correlated with the TRAP test in aggregometry (0.662, P<0.05), an effect not observed in patients treated with antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolongation of CT-EXTEM and CT-INTEM indicates delayed initiation of clot formation. The CT-EXTEM seems to facilitate qualitative monitoring of dabigatran. In contrast, qualitative monitoring of rivaroxaban by CT-EXTEM may be limited as rivaroxaban may affect the measurement at therapeutic plasma levels. It seems that clot formation is faster/firmer in the presence of increased dabigatran plasma levels. This can be attributed to a non-dose-dependent effect via increased fibrin polymerization and second to a dose-dependent effect via increased platelet sensitivity to thrombin.

[Management of hemorrhage in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants]

The introduction of nonvitamin K antagonistic, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) made thromboembolic prophylaxis easier for patients. For many physicians, however, there is still uncertainty about monitoring, preoperative discontinuation, and restarting of DOAC therapy. Guidelines for the management of bleeding are provided, but require specific therapeutic skills in the management of diagnostics and therapy of acute hemorrhage. Small clinical studies and case reports indicate that unspecific therapy with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and activated PCC (aPCC) concentrate may reverse DOAC-induced anticoagulation. However, PCC or aPCC at higher doses potentially provoke thromboembolic complications. However, idarucizumab, a specific, fast-acting, antidote for dabigatran, provides immediate and sustained reversal with no intrinsic or prohemostatic activity. This review article provides an overview of the pharmacology and potential risk of DOAC and the management in the perioperative period with a focus of current concepts in the treatment of DOAC-associated bleeding.

The fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived method is not useful in patients anticoagulated with low molecular weight heparins or rivaroxaban

Essentials Fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived (FIBPT-d) behavior in anticoagulated patients is under studied. FIBPT-d method overestimates fibrinogen in rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin samples. Unfractionated heparin and dabigatran samples showed similar bias to the control group. Rabbit brain and human recombinant thromboplastin behavior was different in rivaroxaban samples.

SUMMARY

Background The fibrinogen prothrombin time-derived (FIBPT-d) method with photo-optical coagulometers is easy and economical. However, there are few reports on the behavior of this test on samples from patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Objective To compare fibrinogen results obtained with the Clauss (FIB C) method and the FIBPT-d method with two thromboplastins in anticoagulated patients. Population The study population comprised 295 consecutive anticoagulated patients: 99 treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), 49 treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH), 47 treated with LMWH, 50 treated with rivaroxaban, 50 treated with dabigatran, and 100 normal controls (NCs). Methods Dabigatran samples were analyzed by the use of FIB C with HemosIL Fibrinogen C or 100 NHI thrombin units mL-1 reagents; rabbit brain and human recombinant thromboplastins with HemosIL PTFibrinogen HS plus (HS) and Recombiplastin 2G (RP) were used for FIBPT-d method. Heparin and rivaroxaban levels were assessed with HemosIL Liq antiXa with specific calibrators; dabigatran levels were determined with the HemosIL Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Assay. All assays were performed on the ACL TOP platform in two laboratories. Percentage biases for the FIBPT-d method versus the FIB C method were calculated by the use of Bland-Altman plots. Results Positive biases of the FIBPT-d method versus the FIB C method with both thromboplastins were seen in NC samples (13.7% and 18.9% for HS and RP, respectively), but biases with HS in rivaroxaban and VKA patient samples were higher than that in NC samples, at 31.9% and 34.0%, respectively. LMWH patient samples showed higher bias than NC samples: 26.5% and 29.3.0% with HS and RP, respectively. UFH and dabigatran patient samples showed similar bias as NC samples. Conclusion The FIBPT-d method should not be used in anticoagulated patients, because the FIBPT-d mathematical algorithm has been validated only in normal subjects, so overestimation could occur in these patients.

Blutungsrisiko und Blutungsnotfälle unter Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban, the first direct factor-Xa inhibitor anticoagulant, has been approved for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adult patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. There is no requirement for coagulation monitoring with rivaroxaban in routine clinical practice. However, in certain clinical circumstances such as life-threatening bleeding or an emergency operation the measurement of the thromboplastin time with a sensitive reagent will deliver first information. A quantitative determination of rivaroxaban plasma concentration is possible using an anti-factor Xa assay.

In the case of a patient under long-term anticoagulation with rivaroxaban requiring an elective surgery, a discontinuation of rivaroxaban 20 to 30 hours before the operation is sufficient to normalize the associated bleeding risk, as long as the renal and liver function is normal. A longer interval should be taken into consideration, when the patient presents a renal and liver impairment or is of a higher age. In the event of an emergency operation effective rivaroxaban concentrations might be present. Nevertheless, we advise against using a prophylactic dose of factor concentrates. Recommendations: From a clinical perspective, in the event of a minor bleeding we recommend a temporary discontinuation of rivaroxaban, whereas for clinically relevant major or severe bleeding events a mechanical compression or a limited surgical i. e. interventional treatment is required. Supportive measures such as the administration of blood products or tranexamic acid might be beneficial. In addition to haemodynamic supportive measures life threatening bleeding events demand a comprehensive haemostasis management, as well as the application of PCC.

Management consensus guidance for the use of rivaroxaban – an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor

A number of novel oral anticoagulants that directly target factor Xa or thrombin have been developed in recent years. Rivaroxaban and apixaban (direct factor Xa inhibitors) and dabigatran etexilate (a direct thrombin inhibitor) have shown considerable promise in large-scale, randomised clinical studies for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and have been approved for clinical use in specific indications. Rivaroxaban is licensed for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective hip or knee replacement surgery, the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Based on the clinical trial data for rivaroxaban, feedback on its use in clinical practice and the authors’ experience with the use of rivaroxaban, practical guidance for the use of rivaroxaban in special patient populations and specific clinical situations is provided. Although most recommendations are in line with the European summary of product characteristics for the approved indications, additional and, in several areas, different recommendations are given based on review of the literature and the authors’ clinical experience.

Influence of dabigatran and rivaroxaban on routine coagulation assays

The Belgian national External Quality Assessment Scheme performed a nationwide survey using lyophilised plasma samples spiked with dabigatran or rivaroxaban to demonstrate to the Belgian clinical laboratories how these drugs affect their routine coagulation assays prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen and antithrombin. Virtually all Belgian laboratories performing routine coagulation testing (189/192) participated in the survey. Both, dabigatran and rivaroxaban significantly prolonged the PT and aPTT in a concentration- and reagent-dependent manner. PT reagents were more influenced by rivaroxaban than by dabigatran and aPTT reagents more influenced by dabigatran than by rivaroxaban. Among PT reagents, Neoplastin R® was the most sensitive to rivaroxaban and Innovin ® and Thromborel S® the least sensitive. Converting PT results to INR only increased the variability between reagents. Among aPTT reagents, Actin FSL® was the least sensitive to dabigatran while the other aPTT reagents showed slightly higher sensitivities. The presence of dabigatran led to falsely reduced fibrinogen concentrations when measured with a low thrombin concentration reagent. The presence of dabigatran caused an overestimation of the antithrombin level when measured with a thrombin-based activity assay and the presence of rivaroxaban an overestimation of the antithrombin level when measured with a FXa-based assay. Instrument-related differences were found for all tested parameters. In conclusion, this paper provides detailed information on the effect of dabigatran and rivaroxaban on routine coagulation assays as performed with a large number of reagent/instrument combinations.

Ex vivo effects of low-dose rivaroxaban on specific coagulation assays and coagulation factor activities in patients under real life conditions

Global coagulation assays display variable effects at different concentrations of rivaroxaban. The aim of this study is to quantify the ex vivo effects of low-dose rivaroxaban on thrombophilia screening assays and coagulation factor activities based on the administration time, and to show how to mask possible interferences. Plasma samples from 40 patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg daily were investigated to measure activities of clotting factor II, V, VII, VIII, IX, XI, XII and XIII; protein C- and protein S-levels; lupus anticoagulants; anticardiolipin IgG and IgM; D-dimer, heparin-platelet factor 4 (HPF4) antibodies and screening tests for von Willebrand disease (VWD). Two hours after rivaroxaban administration, the activities of clotting factors were significantly decreased to different extents, except for factor XIII. Dilution of plasma samples resulted in neutralisation of these interferences. The chromogenic protein C activity assay was not affected by rivaroxaban. Depending on the timing of tablet intake in relation to blood sampling protein S activity was measured falsely high when a clotting assay was used. False-positive results for lupus anticoagulants were observed depending on the assay system used and the administration time of rivaroxaban. ELISA-based assays such as anticardiolipin IgG and IgM, D-dimer, HPF4-antibodies and the turbidimetric assays for VWD were not affected by rivaroxaban. Specific haemostasis clotting tests should be performed directly prior to rivaroxaban intake. Assay optimisation in the presence of rivaroxaban can be achieved by plasma dilution. Immunologic assays are not influenced by rivaroxaban, while chromogenic assays can be used, when they do not depend on factor Xa.

Edoxaban: Impact on routine and specific coagulation assays

Assessment of plasma concentration/effect of edoxaban may be useful in some situations. Also, clinicians need to know how routine coagulation assays are influenced. It was our aim to determine coagulation tests useful for the assessment of edoxaban’s pharmacodynamics and provide recommendations for the interpretation of haemostasis diagnostic tests. Edoxaban was spiked at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1,000 ng/ml in platelet-poor plasma which covers the on-therapy range (from ± 25 ng/ml at Ctrough to ± 170 ng/ml at Cmax). aPTT, PT, dRVVT, chromogenic anti-Xa assays, TGA and a large panel of haemostasis diagnostic tests were performed using several reagents. A concentration-dependent prolongation of aPTT, PT and dRVVT was observed. The effect was dependent on the reagents. FXa chromogenic assays showed high sensitivity and a linear correlation depending on the methodology. TGA may be useful to assess the pharmacodynamics of edoxaban but its turnaround time and the lack of standardisation are limitations. Edoxaban impairs the assessment of lupus anticoagulant, protein S (clotting method), APC-R, antithrombin (FXa-based assay) and measurement of clotting factor activity. Immunological assays and assays acting below the FXa are not influenced by edoxaban. In conclusion, some PT reagents could be used to estimate edoxaban activity. Chromogenic anti-Xa assays are required to assess the plasma concentration. TGA may be useful but requires standardisation. In case of thrombophilia or in the exploration of a haemorrhagic event, immunological assays should be recommended, when applicable. Standardisation of the time between the last intake and the sampling is mandatory to provide a proper assessment of the result.

Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels requires different calibrator sets but not addition of antithrombin

Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor, which can be monitored by anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays. This ex vivo study evaluated different assays for accurate determination of rivaroxaban levels. Eighty plasma samples from patients receiving rivaroxaban (Xarelto®) 10 mg once daily and 20 plasma samples from healthy volunteers were investigated using one anti-factor Xa assay with the addition of exogenous antithrombin and two assays without the addition of antithrombin. Two different lyophilised rivaroxaban calibration sets were used for each assay (low concentration set: 0, 14.5, 59.6 and 97.1 ng/ml; high concentration set: 0, 48.3, 101.3, 194.2 and 433.3 ng/ml). Using a blinded study design, the rivaroxaban concentrations determined by the assays were compared with concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS. All assays showed a linear relationship between the rivaroxaban concentrations measured by HPLC-MS/MS and the optical density of the anti-FXa assays. However, the assay with the addition of exogenous anti-thrombin detected falsely high concentrations of rivaroxaban even in plasma samples from controls who had not taken rivaroxaban (intercept values using the high calibrator set and the low calibrator set: +26.49 ng/ml and +13.71 ng/ml, respectively). Plasma samples, initially determined by the high calibrator setting and containing rivaroxaban concentrations <25 ng/ml, had to be re-run using the low calibrator setting for precise measurement. In conclusion, anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays that use rivaroxaban calibrators at different concentration levels can be used to measure accurately a wide range of rivaroxaban concentrations ex vivo. Assays including exogenous antithrombin are unsuitable for measurement of rivaroxaban.

Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban

Knowledge of anticoagulation status during rivaroxaban therapy is desirable in certain clinical situations. It was the study objective to determine coagulation tests most useful for assessing rivaroxaban’s anticoagulant effect. Peak and trough blood samples from 29 patients taking rivaroxaban 20 mg daily were collected. Mass spectrometry and various coagulation assays were performed. “On-therapy range” was defined as the rivaroxaban concentrations determined by LC-MS/ MS. A “misprediction percentage” was calculated based on how often results of each coagulation assay were in the normal reference range, while the rivaroxaban concentration was in the “on-therapy” range. The on-therapy range was 8.9 – 660 ng/ml. The misprediction percentages for prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), using multiple reagents and coagulometers, ranged from 10% – 52% and 31% – 59%, respectively. PT, aPTT and activated clotting time (ACT) were insensitive to trough rivaroxaban: 59%, 62%, and 80% of samples had a normal result, respectively. Over 95% of PT and ACT values were elevated at peak. Four different rivaroxaban calibrated anti-Xa assays had R2 values >0.98, demonstrating strong correlations with rivaroxaban drug levels. In conclusion, PT, aPTT and ACT are often normal in patients on therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban. However, PT and ACT may have clinical utility at higher drug plasma levels. Rivaroxaban calibrated anti-factor Xa assays can accurately identify low and high on-therapy rivaroxaban drug levels and, therefore, have superior utility in all clinical situations where assessment of anticoagulation status may be beneficial.

This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01743898).

Position Paper on laboratory testing for patients on direct oral anticoagulants. A Consensus Document from the SISET, FCSA, SIBioC and SIPMeL

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) do not require dose-adjustment on the basis of laboratory test results, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect is useful in special situations. This position paper issued by the Italian Scientific Societies that are mainly involved in the management of patients on DOAC is aimed at providing guidance to care-givers on which tests should be used and the situations in which testing is useful. The guidance is based on the data from the literature so far available and/or on consensus among experts.

[Monitoring of NOAC]

BACKGROUND

Monitoring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is usually not necessary; however, in some patients it may prove beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

Patient subgroups who may profit from monitoring were identified, and methods of monitoring (including assessment of which coagulation parameters are affected by NOAC) are described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for each of the search terms, "NOAC", "DOAC", "rivaroxaban", "dabigatran", and "apixaban", in combination with one of the terms, "monitoring", "measurement", "measuring", or "assessment". The results were compiled and reviewed.

RESULTS

Monitoring is most advantageous in emergency cases with severe bleeding where drug activity needs to be assessed. It can also help in deciding for or against lysis therapy after acute stroke in patients taking NOAC. Furthermore, it can also identify compliance problems and help in planning periprocedural management. There are quantitative measurement methods which measure plasma concentrations exactly and qualitative methods which only allow for a rough estimate or a general confirmation of drug activity. Recommended quantitative measurement methods are diluted thrombin time for dabigatran, and anti-factor Xa activity (calibrated) for rivaroxaban and apixaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient subgroups may profit from monitoring of NOAC plasma concentration. One should, however, take several issues into consideration before measurements, such as the objective of each individual measurement, possible consequences (e. g., dose adjustment), and which measurement method to pick.

The laboratory's 2015 perspective on direct oral anticoagulant testing

The introduction of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy into clinical use in the past 5 years has had significant impact on the clinical laboratory. Clinicians' desire to determine plasma drug presence or measure drug concentration, and more recent observations regarding the limitations and utility of coagulation testing in the setting of DOAC treatment, suggest that early published recommendations regarding laboratory testing should be reassessed. These initial recommendations, furthermore, were often based on drug-spiked plasma studies, rather than samples from patients receiving DOAC therapy. We have demonstrated that reagent sensitivity varies significantly whether drug-spiked samples or samples from DOAC-treated patients are tested. Data from drug-enriched samples must therefore be interpreted with caution or be used as a guide only. We present laboratory assays that can be used to determine drug presence and to measure drug concentration, and provide recommended testing algorithms. As DOAC therapy may significantly impact on specialty coagulation assays, we review those tests with the potential to give false-positive and false-negative results.

In vitro reversal of supratherapeutic rivaroxaban levels with coagulation factor concentrates

BACKGROUND

A bleeding patient undergoing therapy with new oral anticoagulants is every clinician's nightmare as no specific reversal agent is available yet. This in vitro study investigated the effect of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on supratherapeutic rivaroxaban concentrations using standard laboratory parameters (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] and PT ratio) and thromboelastometry (clotting time [CT]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples from 10 healthy volunteers were collected and spiked with a supratherapeutic dose of rivaroxaban. Afterwards PCC, rFVIIa and aPCC were added in two doses. The laboratory parameters were measured and thromboelastometry was performed.

RESULTS

The addition of the reversal agents had the following statistically significant effects (all p<0.01): +25 IU/kg PCC: CT -15 s, aPTT +5 s; +50 IU/kg PCC: aPTT +11 s; +90 μg rFVIIa: CT -141 s; +25 IU/kg aPCC: CT -142 s, aPTT -9 s, PT ratio +14%, PT -10.5 s; +50 IU/kg aPCC: CT -118 s, aPTT -7 s, PT ratio +17%, PT -12.2 s.

DISCUSSION

rFVIIa and aPCC, but not PCC, appear to shorten coagulation times significantly in standard laboratory and thromboelastometry assays. These results need confirmation through evaluation of these agents in the clinical setting.

Managing Subdural Bleeding Associated With Rivaroxaban: A Series of 3 Cases

OBJECTIVE

To report 3 cases of subdural bleeding associated with rivaroxaban managed by 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC3).

CASE SUMMARIES

Case 1 presented with a 1-cm thick subdural hematoma (SDH) 12 hours after her last dose of rivaroxaban. Case 2 presented with a right 1-cm acute right SDH with 2 to 3 mm of midline shift 24 hours after his last dose of rivaroxaban. Case 3 presented with a 1.8-cm thick right cerebral convexity hematoma 12 hours after her last dose of rivaroxaban. All patients received 23 to 35 units/kg PCC3 with 1 to 3 units of fresh frozen plasm (FFP) and demonstrated no progression in lesions measured by repeat computed tomography (CT). Two patients were discharged to rehabilitation facilities and 1 patient ultimately died due to the location of the lesion.

DISCUSSION

Rivaroxaban has no specific antidote. Current bleeding management strategies are based on expert opinion. The risks and benefits for differing strategies are unclear, and no clinical experience has been reported to date. These cases begin to illuminate differences among choices for managing bleeding associated with Xa inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

In this case series, 25 to 35 units/kilogram PCC3 and FFP 1 to 3 units ceased rivaroxaban-associated bleeding without thrombogenic complications.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban in orthopaedics: is there a difference in their plasma concentrations and anticoagulant effects?

The aim of this study was to improve knowledge of what happens in the coagulation of orthopaedic patients under rivaroxaban and apixaban, in order to finalize and cross-validate effective measurement methods and to provide arguments for helping to reference one or the other drug in our central pharmacy. One hundred and two patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were included. Half of them received rivaroxaban and the other half received apixaban. Blood samples (n = 244 with each drug) were taken at Cmax preoperatively and twice a week, apart from the day of the patient's discharge, when Ctrough concentration was targeted. Routine coagulation parameters, and functional and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assays for measurement of circulating concentrations were studied. The LC-MS/MS assay and the functional assays carried out in patients under routine conditions were highly correlated, apart from low concentrations (<30 ng/ml), which were affected by the variable individual potential to inhibit the exogenous bovine Xa used in the functional assays. After 1 week of treatment, the drugs differed: Cmax and Ctrough were closer when apixaban was taken twice daily (83 ± 39 and 58 ± 17 ng/ml) than with rivaroxaban taken once a day (113 ± 67 and 13 ± 20 ng/ml). Rivaroxaban had a greater influence on routine coagulation tests and reduced the maximum thrombin concentration more efficiently, as assessed by the thrombin generation test. Although rivaroxaban and apixaban present apparently similar constant rates, they exhibit significant differences in their concentrations and anticoagulant effects when studied ex vivo in orthopedic patients.

Current and developing strategies for monitoring and reversing direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

In light of the increasing clinical utilization of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, this review evaluates strategies for monitoring and reversing the anticoagulant effect of these agents.

METHODS

We summarize the data currently available for laboratory monitoring and reversal of DOACs. Relevant literature was identified using search terms pertaining to oral anticoagulants, reversal agents, and laboratory monitoring using Pubmed, clinicaltrials.gov, and abstracts from recent major cardiovascular meetings.

RESULTS

Significant user appeal for the DOACs stems from the reliable pharmacokinetics of these agents, which render routine laboratory monitoring unnecessary for general use, as well as lower rates of bleeding as compared to warfarin. However, readily available laboratory tests have not been clinically validated for use with these agents. The ability to measure the anticoagulant effect of a DOAC in selected situations (e.g. serious bleeding, overanticoagulation, emergent procedures, and compliance monitoring) remains an unmet clinical need. Further, there is a paucity of data to guide treatment in patients receiving DOACs who experience a serious hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

While evidence-based recommendations cannot be definitively provided for management of DOAC-related bleeding events at present, several targeted reversal agents are currently in development, and hold promise for solving this important clinical problem.

Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants: Accurate Measurement of Plasma Drug Concentrations

Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have now widely reached the lucrative market of anticoagulation. While the marketing authorization holders claimed that no routine monitoring is required and that these compounds can be given at fixed doses, several evidences arisen from the literature tend to demonstrate the opposite. New data suggests that an assessment of the response at the individual level could improve the benefit-risk ratio of at least dabigatran. Information regarding the association of rivaroxaban and apixaban exposure and the bleeding risk is available in the drug approval package on the FDA website. These reviews suggest that accumulation of these compounds increases the risk of experiencing a bleeding complication. Therefore, in certain patient populations such as patients with acute or chronic renal impairment or with multiple drug interactions, measurement of drug exposure may be useful to ensure an optimal treatment response. More specific circumstances such as patients experiencing a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during the treatment duration, patients who require urgent surgery or an invasive procedure, or patient with a suspected overdose could benefit from such a measurement. This paper aims at providing guidance on how to best estimate the intensity of anticoagulation using laboratory assays in daily practice.

Heparin-Calibrated Chromogenic Anti-Xa Activity Measurements in Patients Receiving Rivaroxaban

Background: Determination of plasma rivaroxaban concentration may be necessary in certain clinical situations. Rivaroxaban concentration can be accurately and rapidly determined using a chromogenic anti–activated factor X (factor Xa) assay with specific drug calibrator material. However, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved rivaroxaban calibrators available in the United States. Objective: To determine whether FDA-approved commercial kits for measuring heparin anti–factor Xa activity can be used to assess rivaroxaban concentrations when calibrated for unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins. Methods: Trough and peak samples were taken from 30 patients taking rivaroxaban as part of their routine care for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. The samples were tested using 3 different FDA-approved commercial kits for measuring heparin anti–factor Xa activity. Results: There was acceptable correlation between rivaroxaban levels and heparin anti–factor Xa activity using Berichrom and COAMATIC heparin kits. The STA liquid heparin method was the most sensitive to presence of rivaroxaban. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a strong correlation, but variability between kits, for assessing rivaroxaban concentrations using heparin anti–factor Xa assays. The extent of the heparin calibration curve significantly limits the measurable rivaroxaban range, and this application may be useful only for trough samples. The STA liquid heparin, being exquisitely sensitive to rivaroxaban, may be suitable for ruling out presence of the drug. The routine use of heparin-calibrated anti–factor Xa assays to quantify rivaroxaban is not advocated, and when applied, it must be used with caution and limitations clearly understood.

Interpretation of coagulation test results under direct oral anticoagulants

Diagnostic of global coagulation parameters is part of the daily clinical routine practice in conservative as well in operative disciplines. The correct interpretation of in vitro test results in context to the ex vivo influence of anticoagulant drugs and the in vivo hemostatic system of the individual patient is dependent on the doctors clinical and laboratory experience. This article shortly reviews the laboratory interference of oral anticoagulants including the target-specific inhibitors dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban on coagulation parameters and discusses the potential of several methods for measuring the anticoagulant effect of the direct oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants as alternative treatment options for the effective long-term treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism in primary care: a review

Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a potentially life-threatening venous thromboembolic disorder, and prompt treatment is vital to prevent early mortality. However, diagnosis of PE is complicated by the range of signs and symptoms with which it presents. Clinical risk scores, imaging techniques, and laboratory tests are recommended in clinical guidelines to aid diagnosis, and risk stratification strategies can be used to inform treatment decisions. Long-term anticoagulation is key to avoid the risk of later complications of acute PE, such as recurrent venous thromboembolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant that has been approved for the treatment of PE (and deep vein thrombosis) and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism; other direct oral anticoagulants have undergone phase III trials for these indications. These agents may provide advantages over traditional anticoagulants, such as vitamin K antagonists, because they are administered at fixed doses and do not require routine coagulation monitoring. These advantages may improve patient adherence and aid general practitioners by simplifying long-term management of PE in daily primary care.

Direct oral anticoagulants – laboratory monitoring

Die zum niedermolekularen Heparin (NMH) ähnliche Pharmakokinetik der DOAKs (Direkte Orale Antikoagulanzien) ermöglicht im klinischen Alltag den Austausch dieser Substanzen unter Beibehaltung der Anwendungsfrequenz. Vor allem bei nicht sicherer oder nicht möglicher oraler Anwendung von DOAKs erfolgt die parenterale Gabe von NMH. Die benötigte Karenzzeit vor Interventionen oder Operationen ist für beide Anwendungen präzise darstellbar. Beide Substanzklassen werden, wo nötig, durch ähnliche Labortests überwacht.

Ein generelles therapiebegleitendes Gerinnungsmonitoring, wie es seit vielen Jahrzehnten unter Verwendung von Vitamin-K Antagonisten üblich ist, ist unter Einnahme der neuen Xa- und Thrombin-Inhibitoren nicht erforderlich. Treten bei Patienten, die mit den DOAK behandelt werden, spezielle klinische Situationen auf (z.B. notfallmäßige Operationen oder Interventionen, akute Blutungssituation, akutes Organversagen), so können für den behandelnden Arzt Informationen über die Wirkspiegel im Plasma des Patienten die Einschätzung des Blutungsrisikos erleichtern. Da die DOAKs an zentraler Stelle in das Gerinnungssystem eingreifen, zeigen sie eine Interferenz mit den globalen Gerinnungstesten wie z.B. Thromboplastinzeit (TPZ; Quick/INR), aktivierte partielle Thromboplastinzeit (aPTT) und Thrombinzeit (TZ)(nur Thrombininhibitoren!) und speziellen gerinnungsphysiologischen Untersuchungen. Die Veränderungen in der Gerinnungsdiagnostik sind sowohl abhängig vom Wirkmechanismus des DOAK und der entsprechenden Halbwertszeit als auch vom Zeitpunkt der Tabletteneinnahme, der Dosierung und vom dem im Gerinnungslabor verwendetem Testsystem/Reagenz. Zur Interpretation der hämostaseologischen Messergebnisse muss dem behandelnden Arzt und dem Labormediziner bekannt sein, welches DOAK zu welchem Zeitpunkt eingenommen wurde. Weiters muss die Empfindlichkeit (Dosis-Wirkungskurve) des jeweiligen verwendeten Testsystems berücksichtigt werden. Mit den Globaltesten der Gerinnung können unter Behandlung mit DOAK lediglich abschätzende (semi-quantitative) Aussagen getroffen werden:

Liegt unter Einnahme von Rivaroxaban die Thromboplastinzeit (Quick / INR) im Normbereich (vorausgesetzt es wurde im Labor ein auf Rivaroxaban empfindliches Reagenz, z.B. Neoplastin Plus benutzt), so kann gefolgert werden, dass eine klinisch relevante Restwirkung von Rivaroxaban im Patientenplasma unwahrscheinlich ist. Unter Einnahme von Dabigatran weist eine aPTT >80 sec im Talspiegel auf ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko hin, eine im Normbereich liegende TZ lässt auf die Abwesenheit von Dabigatran im Plasma schließen.

Für die Quantifizierung der Plasmakonzentration von anti-Xa Inhibitoren stehen speziell auf die jeweilige Substanz kalibrierte chromogene anti-Xa-Teste zur Verfügung. Für die Quantifizierung der Plasmakonzentration von Dabigatran kann die kalibrierte verdünnte Thrombinzeit (Hemoclot®) eingesetzt werden. Eine Messung der Medikamentenkonzentrationen ist im klinischen Alltag jedoch bislang routinemäßig nicht vorgesehen, da die gemessenen Plasmakonzentrationen klinisch derzeit nicht für den einzelnen Patienten interpretiert werden können. Insgesamt muss der Einsatz hämostaseologischer Labormethoden zum Nachweis von DOAKS den lokalen Gegebenheiten entsprechend geplant und immer wieder (z. B. bei Reagenzienwechsel) zwischen Labor und Klinik abgestimmt werden.

Measurement of rivaroxaban and apixaban in serum samples of patients

BACKGROUND

The determination of rivaroxaban and apixaban from serum samples of patients may be beneficial in specific clinical situations when additional blood sampling for plasma and thus the determination of factor Xa activity is not feasible or results are not plausible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary aim of this study was to compare the concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban in serum with those measured in plasma. Secondary aims were the performance of three different chromogenic methods and concentrations in patients on treatment with rivaroxaban 10 mg od (n = 124) or 20 mg od (n = 94) or apixaban 5 mg bid (n = 52) measured at different time.

RESULTS

Concentrations of rivaroxaban and apixaban in serum were about 20-25% higher compared with plasma samples with a high correlation (r = 0·79775-0·94662) using all assays (all P < 0·0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients were about 0·90 for rivaroxaban and 0·55 for apixaban. Mean rivaroxaban concentrations were higher at 2 and 3 h compared with 1 and 12 h after administration measured from plasma and serum samples (all P-values < 0·05) and were not different between 1 vs. 12 h (plasma and serum).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that rivaroxaban and apixaban concentrations can be determined specifically from serum samples.

Rivaroxaban: a review of its use in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation

Rivaroxaban (Xarelto(®)), a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Canada or those with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) in the EU, US and Japan. It is administered at a fixed oral dose and generally does not require routine monitoring of coagulation parameters. In the ROCKET AF trial in patients with NVAF and a moderate to high risk of stroke, oral rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal impairment) was noninferior to oral dose-adjusted warfarin once daily in preventing primary endpoint events (i.e. stroke and systemic embolism) in the per-protocol population (primary noninferiority analysis) and superior in the on-treatment safety population (primary superiority analysis). Several ROCKET AF subgroup analyses indicated that the treatment effect of rivaroxaban was consistent across patient subgroups stratified according to baseline factors, including the presence or absence of previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Patients with moderate renal impairment receiving the reduced rivaroxaban dosage (15 mg once daily) showed a treatment effect consistent with that seen with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily in patients with normal renal function. The tolerability profile of rivaroxaban was generally acceptable in ROCKET AF, with no significant difference between rivaroxaban and warfarin in the incidence of major or nonmajor clinically-relevant bleeding events (primary safety endpoint). In the Japanese ROCKET AF trial, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily (10 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal impairment) was noninferior to oral dose-adjusted warfarin once daily in the incidence of major or nonmajor clinically-relevant bleeding (primary study outcome). Thus, rivaroxaban is a reasonable alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF.

New oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a review of pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, quality of life, and cost effectiveness

Atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to be a leading cause of cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality resulting from cardioembolic stroke. Oral anticoagulation therapy has been shown to decrease the incidence of cardioembolic stroke in patients with AF by more than 50%. Appropriate use of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists requires precise adherence and monitoring. A number of factors that potentially induce patients’ dissatisfaction reduce quality of patient life. New direct oral anticoagulants, such as the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, were developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional anticoagulant drugs. However, models to optimize the benefit of therapy and to ensure that therapy can be safely continued are missing for the new oral anticoagulants. This review will briefly describe the new oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban with focus on their use for prevention of embolic events in AF. Moreover, it will discuss the safety, efficacy, cost data, and benefit for patients’ quality of life and adherence.

Rivaroxaban as an oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the developed world and is associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of stroke, accounting for up to 15% of strokes in the general population. The European Society of Cardiology now recommends direct oral anticoagulants, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, in preference to vitamin K antagonist therapy for the prevention of stroke in patients with A F. This review focuses on the direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban, summarizing the properties that make rivaroxaban appropriate for anticoagulant therapy in this indication (including its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and once-daily dosing regimen) and describing data from the Phase III ROCKET AF trial, which showed once-daily rivaroxaban to be noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. In this trial, similar rates of major and nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding were observed; however, when compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban was associated with clinically significant reductions in intracranial and fatal bleeding. On the basis of these results, rivaroxaban was approved in both the United States and the European Union for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF. Subanalyses of ROCKET AF data showed rivaroxaban to have consistent efficacy and safety across a wide range of patients, and studies to confirm these results in real-world settings are underway. This review also describes practical considerations for treatment with rivaroxaban in clinical practice (including dose reductions in specific high-risk patients, eg, those with renal impairment), recommendations for the transition from vitamin K antagonists to rivaroxaban, the management of bleeding events, and the measurement of rivaroxaban exposure.

Measuring the anticoagulant effects of target specific oral anticoagulants-reasons, methods and current limitations

To simplify and optimize oral anticoagulation, new target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOAs) have been developed. The direct thrombin-inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are the first such compounds to receive approval in certain countries for various indications. Due to the predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of these drugs, routine monitoring of patients receiving TSOA therapy has not been considered necessary. However, it has now been realized that in routine clinical settings, there are several situations where it may be prudent to assess the level of TSOA anticoagulation. Several studies evaluating the influence of TSOAs on various coagulation assays have been performed to identify systems that can be used to monitor these drugs. With a particular focus on dabigatran and rivaroxaban, we will describe and discuss the potential of several methods for measuring the anticoagulant effect of TSOAs, as well as their methodological limitations and the restrictions in transferring their results into clinical context.

Rivaroxaban and hemostasis in emergency care

Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, approved for the prevention and treatment of several thromboembolic disorders. Rivaroxaban does not require routine coagulation monitoring and has a short half-life. However, confirmation of rivaroxaban levels may be required in circumstances such as life-threatening bleeding or perioperative management. Here, we explore the management strategies in patients receiving rivaroxaban who have a bleeding emergency or require emergency surgery. Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations can be assessed quantitatively using anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays, or qualitatively using prothrombin time assays (using rivaroxaban-sensitive reagents). In patients receiving long-term rivaroxaban therapy who require elective surgery, discontinuation of rivaroxaban 20–30 hours beforehand is normally sufficient to minimize bleeding risk. For emergency surgery, we advise against prophylactic use of hemostatic blood products, even with high rivaroxaban concentrations. Temporary rivaroxaban discontinuation is recommended if minor bleeding occurs; for severe bleeding, rivaroxaban withdrawal may be necessary, along with compression or appropriate surgical treatment. Supportive measures such as blood product administration might be beneficial. Life-threatening bleeding demands comprehensive hemostasis management, including potential use of agents such as prothrombin complex concentrate. Patients taking rivaroxaban who require emergency care for bleeding or surgery can be managed using established protocols and individualized assessment.

Safety of new oral anticoagulant drugs: a perspective

The recent development of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) offers the possibility of efficacy, relative safety and convenience compared with warfarin. This could lead to greater patient compliance, with easier management and improved provision of thromboprophylaxis. Safety whilst using NOACs should be focused on bleeding cases, surgery or on the management of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with concomitant impairment of renal function, especially since many NOACs are dependent on renal excretion. Thus, if the clearance creatinine indicates severe renal impairment, NOACS will be contraindicated or their dose needs to be changed. In patients who need surgery, there are published protocols of management, depending on the severity of the intervention and renal function. In the case of severe hemorrhage, requiring rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect and in the absence of specific antidotes, alternatives such as one of the nonspecific haemostatic agents must be considered. Clinical evaluation in bleeding situations and a meticulous risk-benefit appraisal for NOACs is needed, and these procoagulant agents and patients must be monitored closely. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology and potential risks, as well as the efficacy and safety of NOACs.

Main considerable factors for correct laboratory test interpretation under DOA treatment

Summary

To avoid misinterpretation and mismanagement clinicians should be aware of the interference of new direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) on coagulation assays. A variety of oral anticoagulants targeting specific coagulation factors has already entered the market, and new indications for DOA will be released each year over the next few years. Due to their heterogeneous mode of action and different pharmacokinetic profile each DOA will vary in its effects on coagulations assays, and it is of current importance to recognize these variable effects.

In this summary the main considerable factors for correct laboratory test interpretation under DOA treatment are described.

Assessment of apixaban plasma levels by laboratory tests: suitability of three anti-Xa assays. A multicentre French GEHT study

While laboratory monitoring is not required in patients treated with apixaban, a direct factor-Xa inhibitor, assessment of its concentration is useful in some critical situations. However, few data are available on its effect on coagulation tests and on the suitability of anti-Xa assays for its quantification. It was the objective of this study to identify laboratory tests suitable for apixaban concentration assessment. Coagulation tests - PT and aPTT- and anti-Xa assays were performed in apixaban-spiked plasma samples. To evaluate the sensitivity of PT and aPTT to apixaban, we conducted a first monocenter part, with a wide range of concentrations (50-1,000 ng/ml), a large panel of reagents (20 reagents), and two coagulometers (STAR®, Stago and ACL TOP®, IL), and a second multicenter part involving 13 laboratories using either a common PT reagent (RecombiPlastin2G®) or the local PT and aPTT reagents. In the multicentre part, five blinded apixaban-spiked plasma samples (0/100/200/400/800 ng/ml - checked by HPLC-MS/MS) were used; apixaban concentrations were measured with three anti-Xa assays, apixaban calibrators and controls (Stago). PT and aPTT tests using a large panel of reagents displayed a low sensitivity to a wide range of apixaban concentrations. The concentrations to double PT ranged from 400 to >1,000 ng/ml with the 10 reagents. With the three anti-Xa assays, inter-laboratory precision and accuracy were below 11% and 12%, respectively. In conclusion, whereas PT and aPTT tests were not sensitive enough to detect apixaban, the three anti-Xa assays tested using lyophilised apixaban calibrators and controls allowed to reliably quantify a wide range of apixaban concentrations.

Measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in 106 patients, who have undergone major orthopedic surgery: an observational study

No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient's plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests--prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients' plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban--mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0-412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0-320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.

Measurement of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in 106 patients, who have undergone major orthopedic surgery: an observational study

No routine coagulation laboratory test is recommended during rivaroxaban or dabigatran treatment. However measuring drug concentration and/or anticoagulant activity can be desirable in some special clinical settings, such as bleeding, thrombosis recurrence or emergency surgery. The effects of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban on various coagulation assays have been previously studied in normal plasma spiked with increasing concentrations of the drug. In contrast, few data are available in routinely treated patients. In order to perform and to interpret the results of these tests, it is necessary to determine the usual responses of patient's plasma. We have used several coagulation tests in a prospective study including 106 patients receiving thromboprophylactic treatment with dabigatran 150 or 220 mg od and rivaroxaban 10 mg od for major orthopaedic surgery. The most common tests--prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)--give results, which vary according to the reagent used. To overcome this limitation, we advocate the use of plasma calibrators, which decreases the inter-laboratory heterogeneity of results. Anti-Xa measurement and Hemoclot, a thrombin diluted clotting assay, are specific assays which have been proposed for rivaroxaban and dabigatran respectively. These tests, conventional PT, aPTT and thrombin generation (TG) have been performed. We demonstrated that measurements of both drugs can determine reliably the drug concentration in patients' plasmas. PT is more prolonged with rivaroxaban than with dabigatran. Interestingly, the pattern of TG was clearly different in relation to the difference in the mechanism of action of the two new anticoagulants. A significant inter-individual variability of response is detected. Rivaroxaban--mean Cmax 140 ng/mL (extremes 0-412) induces a greater increase of PT than dabigatran. aPTT is sensitive to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban concentrations were in good agreement with two other studies while unexplained lower than expected concentrations were found in dabigatran patients receiving 220 mg once a day [mean Cmax 60 ng/mL (extremes 0-320)]. An interference by pantoprazole, a drug which reduces dabigatran absorption, could explain the observed lower than expected results.