Platelet function testing in acute cardiac care – is there a role for prediction or prevention of stent thrombosis and bleeding?

Platelet Reactivity in the Exacerbation of Psoriasis

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated disease with a specific cutaneous presentation. Increased platelet aggregation has been observed in patients with extensive psoriatic lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical factors affecting platelet reactivity in patients with an exacerbation of psoriasis. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, observational study, enrolling patients hospitalized for an aggravation of psoriasis. Enrolled patients underwent single platelet function testing with light transmission aggregometry on the first morning of hospitalization. Results: 120 patients were enrolled in the study. Of the compared subgroups, women had higher maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) than men (77% vs. 72%; p = 0.03), and those with BMIs < 25 kg/m2 showed higher platelet reactivity compared to subjects with BMIs ≥ 25 kg/m2 (75% vs. 73%; p = 0.02). There was a positive correlation between MPA and platelet count (r = 0.27; p < 0.01), as well as C-reactive protein concentration (r = 0.20; p = 0.03), while a negative correlation was observed with total cholesterol (r = -0.24; p = 0.01) and triglycerides (r = -0.30; p < 0.01). A two-step analysis based on multidimensional models with random effects revealed that every increase in the platelet count by 103/μL led to an increase in MPA by 0.07% (R2 = 0.07; p < 0.01), and an increase in triglycerides' concentration by 1 mg/dL was related to a reduction in MPA by 0.05% (R2 = 0.07; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The increased platelet reactivity observed in patients with psoriasis appears to be multifactorial and related to several clinical and laboratory features. Further research is warranted to put these findings into a clinical perspective.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Morphine's Effect on Plasma Concentrations of Ticagrelor and Its Metabolite in Healthy Volunteers

This study aimed to build a mathematical model describing the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) in a stable setting with concomitant administration of morphine. The model consists of a set of four differential equations prepared upon the available knowledge regarding the biological processes in the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor. The set of equations was solved numerically using the Runge–Kutta method. The data were obtained in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy volunteers received a 180-mg ticagrelor loading dose together with either 5-mg morphine or placebo. Blood samples were analyzed with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry to assess plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX before ticagrelor loading dose and after that 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h. The model allowed us to reproduce the experimental results accurately and led us to conclusions consistent with clinical observations that morphine delays the time of maximum drug concentration and that the morphine effect occurs due to decreased gastrointestinal motility. Based on the model, we were able to predict the effect of drug dose on receptor blocking efficacy.

Relation Between Platelet Reactivity Levels and Diabetic Retinopathy Stage in Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Using Multiplate Whole Blood Aggregometry

Purpose: To test the hypothesis of a possible association between platelet reactivity and the severity of diabetic retinopathy using Multiplate whole blood aggregometry in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods: Of 157 patients were divided to three groups based on the severity of diabetic retinopathy (normal, non-proliferative and proliferative [ordinal among group 1-2-3]). Platelet reactivity was measured using arachidonic acid response to the ASPI and ADP platelet test. The association between DR stage and the degree of platelet reactivity (predictor variable) ASPI, ADP, systolic blood pressure, age, hypertension, body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, creatinine, Microalbumin, platelet, triglyceride/HDL and Hscrp variables were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression models (Model 1). The association between DR presence (outcome variable (group 1 vs group 2 and 3)) and the presence of variables was evaluated using binary logistic regression models (Model 2). Results: A comparison of the laboratory parameters of the three groups revealed that the ASPI, ADP, glucose and HbA1c values were significantly higher in Group-3 than Group-1. ASPI (odds-ratio OR: 1.044[1.021-1.09], p < .001], ADP (OR: 1.033[1.010-1.10], p: 0.002] and HbA1c (OR: 2.42(1.22, 4.94), p < .001) were demonstrated to be associated with stage of DR while the other variables were not. In binary logistic regression (model-2) analysis; ASPI (OR: 1.061[1.031-1.1], p < .001], ADP (OR: 1.03(1.01, 1.06), p: 0.045] and HbA1c (OR: 4.37 (1.67, 11.36)], p: 0.002) were associated with DR while the other variables were not. Conclusion: Herewith, we demonstrated that higher platelet reactivity measured by multiplate ASPI and ADP was significantly associated with stages of DR. Therefore, these measurements may be useful to predict the severity of DR in the clinical practice of physicians.

Nitrite circumvents platelet resistance to nitric oxide in patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction and chronic atrial fibrillation

Aims

Heart failure (HF) is a pro-thrombotic state. Both platelet and vascular responses to nitric oxide (NO) donors are impaired in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared with healthy volunteers (HVs) due to scavenging of NO, and possibly also reduced activity of the principal NO sensor, soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), limiting the therapeutic potential of NO donors as anti-aggregatory agents. Previous studies have shown that nitrite inhibits platelet activation presumptively after its reduction to NO, but the mechanism(s) involved remain poorly characterized. Our aim was to compare the effects of nitrite on platelet function in HV vs. HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and chronic atrial fibrillation (HFpEF–AF), vs. patients with chronic AF without HF, and to assess whether these effects occur independent of the interaction with other formed elements of blood.

Methods and results

Platelet responses to nitrite and the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were compared in age-matched HV controls (n = 12), HFpEF–AF patients (n = 29), and chronic AF patients (n = 8). Anti-aggregatory effects of nitrite in the presence of NO scavengers/sGC inhibitor were determined and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation was assessed using western blotting. In HV and chronic AF, both nitrite and SNP inhibited platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by the NO donor SNP was impaired in HFpEF-AF patients compared with healthy and chronic AF individuals, but there was no impairment of the anti-aggregatory effects of nitrite. Nitrite circumvented platelet NO resistance independently of other blood cells by directly activating sGC and phosphorylating VASP.

Conclusion

We here show for the first time that HFpEF-AF (but not chronic AF without HF) is associated with marked impairment of platelet NO responses due to sGC dysfunction and nitrite circumvents the ‘platelet NO resistance’ phenomenon in human HFpEF, at least partly, by acting as a direct sGC activator independent of NO.

Determinants of high platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor

High platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for stent thrombosis, a potentially lethal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. HPR is also associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and death in invasively-treated patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). HPR occurs even in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor, a state-of-the-art antiplatelet agent, especially during the first hours of treatment. Patient-level pharmacodynamic data obtained from 102 ACS subjects enrolled in two prospective, pharmacodynamic trials were analysed in order to identify clinical features related with increased odds of on-ticagrelor HPR during the first two hours after ticagrelor loading dose in ACS patients. Presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (versus non-ST-segment elevation ACS) and morphine co-administration were the strongest predictors of HPR at 1 and 2 hours after ticagrelor loading dose according to linear regression analyses, multiple backward stepwise logistic regression analyses and generalized estimating equation model. By pinpointing simple to recognize clinical features, the results of this study facilitate identification of ACS patients who have the highest odds of HPR during the initial phase of treatment with ticagrelor, and who could potentially benefit from alternative treatment strategies.

Evaluation of platelet activity by multiple electrode impedance aggregometry in acute coronary syndromes: pilot study in a Brazilian tertiary-care public hospital

There is no definite recommendation for testing platelet aggregation (PA) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) due to inconclusive evidence on the usefulness of platelet function tests to guide therapy and improve clinical outcomes. The evaluation of PA with multiple electrode impedance platelet aggregometry (MEA) may be useful to manage antiplatelet therapy and possibly influence patient outcome. The primary aim of this study was to measure PA with MEA in Brazilian patients with ACS and evaluate the association between PA and adverse clinical outcomes. Forty-seven consecutive patients admitted with ACS to a Brazilian tertiary-care public hospital were studied and PA was evaluated using MEA. Patients were followed for six months for the occurrence of all-cause death, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke. Suboptimal inhibition of PA was found in 7 patients (14.9%); 5 (10.6%) in response to ASA (acetylsalicylic acid), 2 (5.0%) to clopidogrel, and none to ticagrelor. Inadequate PA inhibition in response to ASA was significantly associated with the composite end point, but there was no significant association for insufficient PA inhibition in response to clopidogrel. This study suggested that the evaluation of PA in ACS using MEA may identify non-responders to ASA. Larger studies are necessary to define, in a public health scenario, the value of MEA in the management of ACS.

Variability of Platelet Reactivity on Antiplatelet Therapy in Neurointervention Procedure

As more intracranial aneurysms and other cerebrovascular pathologies are treated with neurointervention procedure, thromboembolic events that frequently lead to serious neurological deficit or fatal outcomes are increasing. In order to prevent the thromboembolic events, antiplatelet therapy is used in most procedures including coil embolization, stenting, and flow diversion. However, because of variable individual pharmacodynamics responses to antiplatelet drugs, especially clopidogrel, it is difficult for clinicians to select the adequate antiplatelet regimen and its optimal dose. This article reviews the neurointervention literature related to antiplatelet therapy and suggests a strategy for tailoring antiplatelet therapy in individual patients undergoing neurointervention based on the results of platelet function testing.

Twenty-four-hour time dependency of clopidogrel effects in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CiCAD-Study

Long-term evidence shows an increased risk of cardiovascular events in the morning hours and recent studies in aspirin-treated patients have shown increased platelet reactivity at the end of the dosing interval. Similar pharmacodynamic analyses of adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors are scarce. We therefore investigated changes in clopidogrel-dependent platelet function and activation over 24 h and whether enhanced platelet turnover might explain diurnal variability of platelet function and activation. Twenty-one patients after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) on maintenance doses of clopidogrel (75 mg) and aspirin (100 mg) Once per day (OD) were included. Blood was collected at five time points in 24 h. Platelet function and activation was analyzed by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-phosphorylation (VASP-P), Verify Now, multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), and platelet PAC-1 and P-selectin (P-sel) expression. Additionally, platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and reticulated platelet fraction (RPF) were analyzed. There was significant diurnal variability of clopidogrel effects as documented with VASP-P, Verify Now, and PAC-1 and P-sel (all p < 0.05), whereas MEA did not differ over 24 h. Neither MPV nor RPF varied significantly over 24 h. In patients with high RPF, platelet function and activation was significantly higher in all assays, compared to patients with low RPF (all p < 0.05). However, the changes over time in low versus high RPF groups were similar. ADP-dependent platelet function and activation recovers significantly at the end of the 24-h dosing interval in patients with ACS on a maintenance dose of clopidogrel and aspirin. Although platelet function and activation is increased in patients with higher RPF, platelet turnover might not explain the observed diurnal variability.

Effects of Ramadan fasting on aspirin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients

Aims

Ramadan fasting (RF) may affect aspirin resistance. We conducted this study in patients with cardiovascular risk (CVR) factors to assess the effect of RF on aspirin resistance and explore whether type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) would influence this effect.

Methods

A total of 177 stable patients with ≥2 CVR factors were recruited. All patients observed RF and were taking aspirin. Physical exam and standard biological tests including glycaemia and serum lipids data were performed before Ramadan (Pre-R), at the last week of Ramadan (R) and four weeks after the end of Ramadan (Post-R). In the same visits caloric intake was calculated and platelet reactivity to aspirin was assessed using Verify Now point-of-care assay.

Results

In the overall population, there was no significant change in absolute aspirin reaction unit (ARU) values and in metabolic parameters. In DM patients (n = 127), ARU change from Pre-R values was+19.7 (p = 0.01) and +14.4 (p = 0.02) respectively at R and Post-R. During Ramadan, glycaemia, triglycerides, and cholesterol levels increased significantly and returned to Pre-R values thereafter. These changes were not observed in non-DM patients.

Conclusions

During RF aspirin resistance increased only in DM patients. This effect persisted one month after Ramadan. Simultaneous alteration of glycemic control and increase of serum lipids levels could potentially be a favorable factor.

Study registration

The protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under: NCT02720133.

Assessment of bleeding risk in patients with coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy

Patients with coronary artery disease are usually treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients on DAPT are at risk of both ischaemic and bleeding events. Although side-lined for a long time, real-life studies have shown that both the incidence and the associated morbidity and mortality of outof-hospital bleeding are high. This indicates that prevention of (postinterventional) bleeding is as important as prevention of ischaemia. For this purpose it is crucial to reliably identify patients with a high bleeding risk. In order to postulate an algorithm, which could help identifying these patients, we performed a systematic review to determine the value of previously proposed prognostic modalities for bleeding. We searched and appraised the following tools: platelet function tests, genetic tests, bleeding scores and questionnaires and haemostatic tests. Most studies indicated that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR), as measured by several platelet function tests, and the carriage of CYP2C19*17 allele were independent risk factors for bleeding. A bleeding score also proved to be helpful in identifying patients at risk. No studies on haemostatic tests were retrieved. Several patient characteristics were also identified as independent predictors of bleeding, such as older age, female sex and renal failure. Combining these risk factors we propose an algorithm that would hypothetically facilitate identification of those patients at highest risk, warranting prevention measures for bleeding. This could be a starting point for further research concerning the topic.

Effects of Ramadan fasting on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients treated with clopidogrel

Background

The effects of Ramadan fasting (RF) on clopidogrel antiplatelet inhibition were not previously investigated. The present study evaluated the influence of RF on platelet reactivity in patients with high cardiovascular risk (CVR) in particular those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

A total of 98 stable patients with ≥2 CVR factors were recruited. All patients observed RF and were taking clopidogrel at a maintenance dose of 75 mg. Clinical findings and serum lipids data were recorded before Ramadan (Pre-R), at the last week of Ramadan (R) and 4 weeks after the end of Ramadan (Post-R). During each patient visit, nutrients intakes were calculated and platelet reactivity assessment using Verify Now P2Y12 assay was performed.

Results

In DM patients, the absolute PRU changes from baseline were +27 (p = 0.01) and +16 (p = 0.02) respectively at R and Post-R. In addition, there was a significant increase of glycemia and triglycerides levels with a significant decrease of high-density lipoprotein. In non DM patients there was no significant change in absolute PRU values and metabolic parameters. Clopidogrel resistance rate using 2 cut-off PRU values (235 and 208) did not change significantly in DM and non DM patients.

Conclusions

RF significantly decreased platelet sensitivity to clopidogrel in DM patients during and after Ramadan. This effect is possibly related to an increase of glycemia and serum lipids levels induced by fasting.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials.gov NCT02720133. Registered 24 July 2014.Retrospectively registered.

Acute Coronary Stent Thrombosis in Modern Era: Etiology, Treatment, and Prognosis

Acute stent thrombosis (AST) is a rare but life-threatening complication of coronary artery stenting. AST remains a challenging task for cardiologists, despite the application of modern procedural techniques and dual-antiplatelet therapy strategies as well as improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. This review focuses on the prevalence, risk factors, prognosis, multiple potential underlying pathogenesis, knowledge gaps, and recommends diagnosis and individualized management strategies of AST.

Platelet testing in flow diversion: a review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

Although the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with flow diversion is recommended and commonplace, the testing of platelet inhibition is more controversial.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical literature to establish and describe the physiology of platelet adhesion, the pharmacology of antiplatelet medications, and the mechanisms of the available platelet function tests. Additionally, they present a review of the pertinent neurointerventional and interventional cardiology literature.

RESULTS

Competing reports in the neurointerventional literature argue for and against the use of routine platelet function testing, with adjustments to the dosage or medications based on the results. The interventional cardiology literature has also wrestled with this dilemma after percutaneous coronary interventions, with conflicting reports of the benefits of platelet function testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its prevalence, the benefits of platelet function testing prior to flow diversion are unproven. This practice will likely remain controversial until the level of evidence improves through more rigorous testing and reporting.

Platelet aggregation and risk of stent thrombosis or bleeding in interventionally treated diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome

Background

Platelet aggregation monitoring in diabetic patients treated with coronary interventions (PCI) for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a promising way of optimizing treatment and outcomes in this high risk group. The aim of the study was to verify whether clopidogrel response measured by Multiplate analyzer (ADPtest) in diabetic ACS patients treated with PCI predicts the risk of stent thrombosis or cardiovascular mortality and bleeding.

Methods

Into this prospective, observational study 206 elective PCI patients were enrolled. Two cutoff points of ADPtest were used in analysis to divide patients into groups. One (345 AU x min) was calculated based on ROC curve analysis; this cutoff provided the best ROC curve fit, although it did not reach statistical significance. The other (468 AU x min) was accepted based on the consensus of the Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity. The risk of stent thrombosis and mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

The risk of stent thrombosis was higher in the group of patients with impaired clopidogrel response for either cutoff value (for >354 AU x min - HR 12.33; 95% CI 2.49–61.1; P = 0.002). Cardiovascular mortality was also higher in the impaired clopidogrel response group (for >354 AU x min - HR 10.58; 95% CI 2.05–54.58; P = 0.005). We did not find a clear relation of increased clopidogrel response to the risk of bleeding.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that in diabetic ACS patient group treated with PCI an impaired platelet response to clopidogrel measured by the Multiplate analyzer results in increased risk of stent thrombosis and cardiac death.

Which platelet function test best reflects the in vivo plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite? The HARMONIC study

Aim of this study was assessment of the relationship between concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) and results of selected platelet function tests. In a single-centre, cohort study, patients with myocardial infarction underwent blood sampling following a 180 mg ticagrelor loading dose intake (predose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours postdose) to perform pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments. Platelet reactivity was evaluated using the VASP-assay, the VerifyNow device and the Multiplate analyzer. Analysis of 36 patients revealed high negative correlations between ticagrelor concentrations and platelet reactivity evaluated with all three platelet function tests (the VASP-assay: RS=-0.722; p<0.0001; the VerifyNow device: RS=-0.715; p<0.0001; the Multiplate analyzer: RS=-0.722; p<0.0001), with no significant differences between correlation coefficients. Similar results were found for AR-C124910XX. Platelet reactivity values assessed with all three methods generally correlated well with each other; however, a significantly higher correlation (p<0.02) was demonstrated between the VerifyNow and Multiplate tests (RS=0.707; p<0.0001) than in other assay combinations (the VASP-assay and the VerifyNow device: RS=0.595; p<0.0001; the VASP-assay and the Multiplate analyzer: RS=0.588; p<0.0001). With respect to the recognition of high platelet reactivity, we found higher measurement concordance between the VerifyNow and Multiplate tests compared with other assay combinations, while for low platelet reactivity, only results of the VerifyNow and Multiplate assay were related to each other. Platelet reactivity measurements performed with the VASP, VerifyNow and Multiplate tests show comparably strong negative correlations with ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX concentrations.

Is platelet inhibition correlated with time from last intake on P2Y12 blockers after an acute coronary syndrome? A pilot study

Delay from the last intake of drug could be an important and unexplored variable in the biological response to antiplatelet agents after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) discharge. The objective was to define the impact of the delay from P2Y12 blocker intake on the platelet inhibition level. We compared ticagrelor-, prasugrel-, and clopidogrel-treated patients. All consecutive patients, who had been addressed between 2013 and 2014 for ACS, treated with aspirin and a P2Y12 blocker as maintenance dose, were eligible. One month after discharge, blood sample and a questionnaire were proposed to the patient by a nurse blinded to the protocol. On this questionnaire, three questions about name of the drug, regularity of the intakes, and hour of the last intake were collected. The response to antiplatelet therapy was assessed using platelet reactivity index vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (PRI VASP) and % of adenosine-5'-diphosphate-induced aggregation (%ADP).The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between platelet inhibition and delay from drug intake. We enrolled 474 ACS treated with clopidogrel 75 mg in 182 cases (38% patients), prasugrel in 190 cases (40%), or ticagrelor in 102 patients (22%). We observed a significant correlation between delay from intake and PRI VASP and %ADP for ticagrelor (r = 0.25, p = 0.01; r = 0.21, p = 0.03; respectively). On clopidogrel (r = 0.09, p = 0.24; r = 0.02, p = 0.80; respectively) and prasugrel (r = 0.02, p = 0.82; r = 0.11, p = 0.12 respectively), no correlation exists. In conclusion, ticagrelor, unlike thienopyridines, is associated with a significant correlation between delay from the last intake and platelet inhibition.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of ticagrelor in Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess ticagrelor's effects on inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA), P2Y12 reaction units (PRU, measure of platelet P2Y12 receptor blockade), pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and safety in Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This was an open label, single centre, randomized study. Thirty-six patients on low dose aspirin (75-100 mg day(-1) ) received ticagrelor 45, 60 or 90 mg (single dose, days 1 and 7; twice daily, days 3-6). IPA (final extent), PRU and ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

On day 1, peak IPA >80% occurred 2-6 h post-dose (all doses). PRU was markedly reduced at 1 h vs. baseline (all doses). With ticagrelor 45 and 90 mg twice daily, maximum IPA (mean, SD) was 91% (13%), and 99% (3%), and maximum PRU reduction from baseline (mean, SD) was 82% (17%) and 92% (9%), respectively. Approximate dose-proportional increases (mean [%CV]; 45 vs. 90 mg twice daily) in ticagrelor Cmax (616 [37] vs. 1273 [43] ng ml(-1) ) and AUC (3882 [42] vs. 8206 [51] ng ml(-1) h) and AR-C124910XX parameters were seen. Pharmacodynamic and PK differences between 45 and 60 mg were small. No safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients with CAD, ticagrelor (45, 60 and 90 mg) markedly reduced platelet aggregation. The IPA and PRU magnitude increased generally with increasing doses. However, the mean pharmacodynamic differences between 45 and 60 mg doses were small. Following single and multiple doses, the mean Cmax and AUC values of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX increased approximately dose proportionally between 45 and 90 mg doses.

Correlation Between SNPs in Candidate Genes and VerifyNow-Detected Platelet Responsiveness to Aspirin and Clopidogrel Treatment

PURPOSE

Patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) against aspirin or clopidogrel are at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. In this study, we explored the predictive value of common SNPs for the on-treatment platelet reactivity (OPR) against aspirin and clopidogrel assessed by VerifyNow assays.

METHODS

This study recruited 286 Han Chinese individuals undergoing antiplatelet treatment, including 159 cases with aspirin only (100 mg/day) and 127 cases with dual therapy (aspirin 100 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day) for at least 2 weeks. The OPR against aspirin and clopidogrel were assessed by VerifyNow Aspirin (ARU) and P2Y12 assays (PRU), respectively. Genotyping for the selected 25 SNPs within 11 genes and 2 GWAS loci was carried out by ABI multiplex SNaPshot method.

RESULTS

The results indicated that rs4244285 (CYP2C19) and rs342293 (7q22.3) were significantly associated with PRU value (both P < 0.01). As for the OPR to aspirin, a weak statistical significance was observed in rs5445 (GNB3) (P = 0.049) and rs5758 (TBXA2R) (P = 0.045). After adjusting for the covariates including gender, age and smoking, carriers of allele A of rs4244285 remained as a strong predictor for HPR against clopidogrel.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggests that common SNPs may predict OPR against clopidogrel as assessed by VerifyNow P2Y12, but are less likely to respond against aspirin as assessed by VerifyNow Aspirin.

Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial

AIMS

The currently available data indicate a drug-drug interaction between morphine and oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, when administered together. The aim of this trial was to assess the influence of infused morphine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind trial, patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenously either morphine (5 mg) or placebo, followed by a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor. Pharmacokinetics was determined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and ticagrelor antiplatelet effects were measured with up to three different platelet function tests: vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode aggregometry and VerifyNow. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment was performed in 70 patients (35 in each study group). Morphine lowered the total exposure to ticagrelor and its active metabolite by 36% (AUC(0-12): 6307 vs. 9791 ng h/mL; P = 0.003), and 37% (AUC(0-12): 1503 vs. 2388 ng h/mL; P = 0.008), respectively, with a concomitant delay in maximal plasma concentration of ticagrelor (4 vs. 2 h; P = 0.004). Multiple regression analysis showed that lower AUC(0-12) values for ticagrelor were independently associated with the administration of morphine (P = 0.004) and the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (P = 0.014). All three methods of platelet reactivity assessment showed a stronger antiplatelet effect in the placebo group and a greater prevalence of high platelet reactivity in patients receiving morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02217878.

Pharmacology of antithrombotic drugs: an assessment of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments

Antithrombotic drugs, which include antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, prevent and treat many cardiovascular disorders and, as such, are some of the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. The first drugs designed to inhibit platelets or coagulation factors, such as the antiplatelet clopidogrel and the anticoagulant warfarin, significantly reduced the risk of thrombotic events at the cost of increased bleeding in patients. However, both clopidogrel and warfarin have some pharmacological limitations including interpatient variability in antithrombotic effects in part due to the metabolism, interactions (eg, drug, environment, and genetic), or targets of the drugs. Increased knowledge of the pharmacology of antithrombotic drugs and the mechanisms underlying thrombosis has led to the development of newer drugs with faster onset of action, fewer interactions, and less interpatient variability in their antithrombotic effects than previous antithrombotic drugs. Treatment options now include the next-generation antiplatelet drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor, and, in terms of anticoagulants, inhibitors that directly target factor IIa (dabigatran) or Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) are available. In this Series paper we review the pharmacological properties of these most commonly used oral antithrombotic drugs, and explore the development of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies.