Diagnostic accuracy study of a factor VIII ELISA for detection of factor VIII antibodies in congenital and acquired haemophilia A

The role of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder that predominantly affects older people with potential underlying comorbidities, including cardiovascular and thrombotic risk factors. The current standard therapies with hemostatic agents for acute bleeding and immunosuppression often require inpatient management, are not approved for routine bleeding prophylaxis, and contribute to the high mortality in this population. Emicizumab is a factor VIII (FVIII) mimetic approved for bleeding prophylaxis in congenital hemophilia A with and without FVIII inhibitors. Given subcutaneously, it may allow easier outpatient bleeding prophylaxis and reduce intensity of immunosuppression. This article summarizes the currently available data on the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in acquired hemophilia A.

Comprehensive comparison of global coagulation assays to differentiate lupus anticoagulant from acquired hemophilia A in patients with prolonged APTT

There is no established method for differentiating acquired hemophilia A (AHA) from lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity because both present with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. We compared various parameters of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), thrombin generation assay (TGA), and clot waveform analysis (CWA) in patients with AHA (n = 10) and LA (n = 44). Compared with AHA, possible (n = 12) and definite (n = 32) LA showed significantly shorter clotting time (CT) in NATEM mode of ROTEM (> 3600 vs. 501/533). In TGA, peak height was significantly lower in AHA (16 vs. 242/174 nM). In CWA, CT was significantly longer (81 vs. 36/41 s) and Ad|min1| was lower (2.1 vs. 8.7/6.7) in AHA. Notably, CT by NATEM and peak height in TGA completely discriminated between AHA and LA, whereas Ad|min1| did not discriminate between them in 4 cases of AHA and 1 of LA. Comparison of 3 patients with both AHA and LA against a patient with only LA and markedly low FVIII activity (3.5%) showed that both CT by NATEM and peak height of TGA precisely classified the former 3 cases as AHA and the latter 1 case as LA, whereas Ad|min1| classified all 4 cases as AHA. ROTEM and TGA can comparably distinguish between AHA and LA.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology recommendations for laboratory measurement of factor VIII and FIX type I inhibitors

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Hematology. The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations on the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors. After an introduction on the clinical background and relevance of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitor testing, the following aspects of laboratory testing are included: screening for inhibitors, assay principle, sample requirements, testing requirements and interpretation, quality assurance, interferences and recent developments. This guidance document focusses on recommendations for a standardised procedure for the laboratory measurement of FVIII and FIX type I inhibitors. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

Usefulness of anti-factor VIII IgG ELISA in acquired hemophilia A follow-up

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune bleeding disorder due to the presence of neutralizing autoantibodies directed against the coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The reference method to detect and quantify anti-FVIII antibodies is the Bethesda assay (BA), but it presents some limitations such as a lack of sensitivity for low titers of inhibitor and the need for experienced laboratory. A commercially available ELISA detecting anti-FVIII antibodies has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity. The aim of our study was to assess the performance of this ELISA for the detection of anti-FVIII IgG in AHA patients during the follow-up. In total, 11 acquired hemophilia A patients were recruited, and anti-FVIII antibody levels were monitored by BA and ELISA. Anti-FVIII IgG ELISA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and it correlated with the BA. Discrepancies observed in 13.3% of cases were consistent with patients' biological evolution. All these data suggest the possible use of anti-FVIII IgG ELISA for both diagnosis and follow-up of AHA patients.

Predictive significance of anti-FVIII immunoglobulin patterns on bleeding phenotype and outcomes in acquired hemophilia A: Results from the Quebec Reference Center for Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder caused by factor VIII (FVIII) autoantibodies, involving various immunoglobulin (Ig) isotypes and IgG subclasses.

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the profile of Ig against FVIII in patients with AHA to identify Ig patterns predictive of bleeding phenotype and outcomes.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ig detection and titration were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at disease presentation in a cohort of 66 subjects from the Quebec Reference Centre for Inhibitors registry.

RESULTS

Most of plasma samples analyzed (97%) contained multiple anti-FVIII Ig isotypes and IgG subclasses, IgG(1,2,3,4) (24.2%), [IgG(1,2,3,4),IgA] (16.7%) and IgG(2.4) (13.6%) being the most prevalent combinations of Ig detected. AHA patients who presented with IgA antibodies were more likely to have an associated auto-immune disease (p = .049). The presence of IgG4-was associated with bleeding symptoms at presentation (p = .002). IgG1-positive patients were more likely to require transfusions with red packed cell (p = .014) whereas IgM detection was associated with a higher probability of death linked to AHA (p = .011).

CONCLUSION

The Ig pattern of AHA patients at diagnosis is widely heterogeneous and is at least partially associated with some underlying conditions. Our data supports the differential predictive significance for IgG1, IgG4 and IgM on bleeding severity and suggests that the early determination of Ig profile may help to identify AHA patients at higher risk of poorer outcomes.

Acquired Hemophilia A

Acquired hemophilia A is a potentially severe bleeding disorder caused by antibodies against the patient's own factor VIII. Acquired hemophilia A is rare. It is most commonly diagnosed in older individuals; about one-half of cases of acquired hemophilia are associated with underlying conditions, including autoimmune disease, cancer, and pregnancy. The diagnosis of acquired hemophilia A can be suspect with an isolated activated partial thromboplastin time elevation, and confirmed with demonstration of reduced factor VIII activity and the presence of a specific factor VIII inhibitor. Treatment of acquired hemophilia A involves control of bleeding, and eradication of the inhibitor.

Emicizumab in acquired haemophilia A: about two clinical cases and literature review

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare and severe haemorrhagic autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies directed against factor VIII (FVIII). Treatment is based on two principles, including haemostatic control to compensate FVIII inhibition and eradication of inhibiting antibodies using immunosuppressive therapy. Rapid recognition and proper management are essential to avoid excess morbidity and mortality. Effective and safe treatments can be challenging, given that AHA patients are often elderly, with multiple comorbidities. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the action of FVIII, has proven effective in managing patients with congenital haemophilia, with or without inhibitors. Likewise, its mode of action suggests theoretical efficacy in AHA patients. We herein describe two AHA cases with comorbidities that were treated effectively using emicizumab combined with immunosuppressive therapy. We have also reviewed the current literature regarding the promising use of emicizumab in this indication.

Acquired Haemophilia A: An Intriguing Disease

Abstract. Acquired Haemophilia A is a rare acquired bleeding disorder caused by Factor VIII autoantibodies, which neutralise FVIII activity. These inhibitors differ from alloantibodies against FVIII, which can occur in congenital Haemophilia A after repeated exposures to plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII products. In most cases, the disease occurs suddenly in subjects without a personal or familiar history of bleedings, with symptoms that may be mild, moderate, or severe. However, only laboratory alterations are present in ~ 30% of patients. The incidence varies from 1 to 4 cases per million/year; more than 80% of patients are elderly, males and females are similarly affected. There is a small peak of incidence related to pregnancy in young women aged 20–40 years. The disease may be underdiagnosed in the elderly. The diagnostic algorithm is based on an isolated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, normal thrombin time, absence of Lupus Anticoagulant, and a mixing test that reveals the presence of an inhibitor: the finding of reduced FVIII activity and the detection of neutralising autoantibodies against FVIII lead to the diagnosis. The disease is idiopathic in 44%–63% of cases, while in the others etiological factors are present. Bleeding prevention and treatment are based on therapeutic tools as by-passing agents, recombinant porcine FVIII concentrate or, in a limited number of cases, FVIII concentrates and desmopressin. As soon as the diagnosis has been made, immunosuppressive therapy must be started to eradicate the inhibitor. Better knowledge of the disease, optimal management of bleeding and eradication of the inhibitor have significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in most patients.

New Hemostatic Agents: Perioperative Anesthetic Considerations

AIM

Pharmacologic agents with procoagulant effects and antidotes against antithrombotic drugs play an important role in the prevention and management of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding. The aim of this narrative review is knowledge transfer from new and renewed hemostatic agents to anesthesiologists and other physicians involved in perioperative medicine.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on PubMed and the Summaries of Product Characteristics of 6 pharmacologic agents of interest: fibrinogen concentrate, vonicog alfa, susoctocog alfa, idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, and argatroban.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This review highlights renewed interest in fibrinogen concentrate, an old prohemostatic drug, in correcting hypofibrinogenemia which is a leading pathomechanism of perioperative bleeding. This review describes clinically relevant aspects for brand new recombinant prohemostatic drugs for their use in critical clinical situations: vonicog alfa for the prevention and correction of bleeding in von Willebrand syndrome, and susoctocog alfa in acquired hemophilia A. Clinical experience and increasing evidence broadened the field of applications of the old antithrombotic drug argatroban to heparin resistance. New antidotes against new antithrombotic agents revolutionized the safety of chronic antithrombotic therapy in the emergency situations of acute and trauma surgery. Information on dosing and handling of new hemostatic drugs is summarized.

CONCLUSION

New and potent hemostatic agents exist for perioperative use and may enrich the armamentarium of anesthesiologists. Implementation into clinical practice requires their availability and user knowledge. Sustainability of these new drugs depends on post-licensing research, cost-effectiveness, and clinical experience.

Cross-reacting inhibitors against recombinant porcine factor VIII in acquired hemophilia A: Data from the GTH-AH 01/2010 Study

BACKGROUND

Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII, OBI-1, susoctocog alfa) is used for the treatment of acute bleeds in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Inhibitors in AHA can sometimes cross-react with rpFVIII.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency, strength, and determinants of cross-reactivity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Baseline samples from 70 patients of the prospective, observational cohort study GTH-AH 01/2010 were assessed for anti-human FVIII and anti-rpFVIII inhibitors using modified Nijmegen-Bethesda assays, as well as anti-human FVIII domain reactivity using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Anti-human FVIII inhibitors were present in all samples ranging between 0.7 and 3891 Bethesda Units (BU)/mL. Inhibitors from 31 of 70 patients (44%) partially inhibited rpFVIII with anti-rpFVIII titers ranging between 0.5 and 471 BU/mL. Anti-rpFVIII titers were ≤5 BU in most patients. Patients with cross-reacting inhibitors, as compared to patients without, had significantly higher anti-human FVIII titers (27.8 versus 5.4 BU/mL) and lower baseline FVIII activity (<1 versus 2.6 IU/dL). The ratio between anti-rpFVIII to anti-human titers was highest for inhibitors involving the C1 domain. Cross-reactivity was very rare, if inhibitors reacted only with the C2 domain of FVIII (6%). An anti-human FVIII titer of >100 BU/mL predicted cross-reactivity with 97% likelihood, whereas an anti-human FVIII titer of <3.8 BU/mL predicted absent cross-reactivity with 90% likelihood.

CONCLUSION

Cross-reacting inhibitors should be considered when choosing a treatment for bleeding patients with AHA. Cross-reactivity is frequent in patients with anti-human FVIII titers of >100 BU/mL.

Compartment syndrome of the forearm with life-threatening bleeding after fasciotomy as the presenting sign of postpartum acquired hemophilia A: a case report

: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by the development of autoantibodies against clotting factor VIII. Although the cause of this disorder remains obscure, it is often linked to malignancies, drug administration, autoimmune diseases and pregnancy. In pregnancy-associated AHA, hemorrhagic symptoms usually present 1-4 months peripartum, however they may occur up to 1-year postpartum. Compartment syndrome of the forearm is also very uncommon complication of AHA but can have devastating consequences. We report a rare case of a compartment syndrome of the forearm in a 30-year-old woman 2.5 months postpartum as the presentation of pregnancy-associated AHA.

Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion as the debut of acquired hemophilia in a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient: A case report, and a review of acquired hemophilia A-related hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disease caused by autoantibodies against factor VIII. Spontaneous bleeding symptoms usually affect the skin and muscle, while pericardial effusion is an extremely rare manifestation. In the elderly, anticoagulant treatment is frequent and bleeding symptoms are usually associated with this.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

We report a hemorrhagic pericardial effusion as the AHA debut in a patient with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and anticoagulated with apixaban for atrial fibrillation and chronic arterial ischemia. The patient was treated with recombinant activated factor VII to control the active bleeding and corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide to eradicate the inhibitor. In addition, a briefly review of hematological malignancies associated to acquired hemophilia was performed. PARTICULARITIES:: a) anticoagulant treatment may confuse the suspicion of AHA and its diagnosis; b) hemorrhagic pericardial effusion is an extremely rare presentation; c) bypassing agents raise the risk of thromboembolism; d) hematological malignancies rarely cause AHA (<20% of cases).

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team is needed to diagnose and manage AHA effectively. The use of anticoagulants may lead to the misdiagnosis of clinical symptoms. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is one of the main causes of hematological malignancies associated. The specific treatment of CLL is still recommended in the event of active disease.

Acquired hemophilia A: Updated review of evidence and treatment guidance

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease resulting from autoantibodies (inhibitors) against endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) that leads to bleeding, which is often spontaneous and severe. AHA tends to occur in elderly patients with comorbidities and is associated with high mortality risk from underlying comorbidities, bleeding, or treatment complications. Treatment, which consists of hemostatic management and eradication of the inhibitors, can be challenging to manage. Few data are available to guide the management of AHA-related bleeding and eradication of the disease-causing antibodies. Endorsed by the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society of North America, an international panel of experts in AHA analyzed key questions, reviewed the literature, weighed the evidence and formed a consensus to update existing guidelines. AHA is likely underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed in real-world clinical practice. Recommendations for the management of AHA are summarized here based on the available data, integrated with the clinical experience of panel participants.

Treatment burden, haemostatic strategies and real world inhibitor screening practice in non-severe haemophilia A

Inhibitor formation in non-severe haemophilia A is a life-long risk and associated with morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data to understand real-world inhibitor screening practice. We evaluated the treatment burden, haemostatic strategies, F8 genotyping and inhibitor screening practices in non-severe haemophilia A in seven London haemophilia centres. In the 2-year study period, 44% (377/853) patients received at least one haemostatic treatment. Seventy-nine percent of those treated (296/377) received factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. F8 genotype was known in 88% (331/377) of individuals. Eighteen per cent (58/331) had 'high-risk' F8 genotypes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes treated on-demand with FVIII concentrate, 51·3% episodes (243/474) were screened within 1 year. However, poor screening compliance was observed after 'high-risk' treatment episodes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes, 12·3% (28/227) of treatment episodes were screened in the subsequent 6 weeks after surgery or a bleed requiring ≥5 exposure days. Similarly, in the context of 'high-risk' F8 genotypes after any FVIII exposure, only 13·6% (12/88) of episodes were screened within 6 weeks. Further study is required to assess optimal practice of inhibitor screening in non-severe haemophilia A to inform subsequent clinical decisions and provide more robust prevalence data to further understand the underlying immunological mechanism.

A close insight to factor VIII inhibitor in the congenital hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A (HA) has an X-linked pattern of inheritance and is the most common of the hemorrhagic disorders. HA is caused by a decreased or deficiency of the functional clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and effects 1 in 5000-10,000 male births. The common treatment for hemophilia is replacement therapy by plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII. Approximately 20-30% of people with a severe type of HA develop an inhibitor and this phenomenon is the main challenge in the management of these patients. Genetic factors and environmental determinants contribute to inhibitor development. Here, the roles of various genetic and environmental factors such as the type of FVIII concentrate used, the number of exposure days, and peak treatment time will be discussed in detail. It seems this information is helpful for hematologists.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was done in January 2016 on PubMed and Scopus using the following keywords:' h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII inhibitor', 'h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII alloantibody', 'h(a)emophilia A & inhibitor'. There was no time limitation; however, there was an English language limitation placed on the articles selected. Expert commentary: Influential genetic and environmental factors in developing inhibitors have been discussed. Most of the risk factors are related to previously untreated patients with hemophili.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of factor VIII binding antibodies in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AH 01/2010 study

Essentials Factor VIII (FVIII) binding IgG detected by ELISA could be an alternative to the Bethesda assay. We studied the performance of anti-FVIII IgG ELISA in patients with acquired hemophilia and controls. Anti-FVIII IgG > 99th percentile of controls was highly sensitive and specific. Patients with high anti-FVIII IgG have a lower chance of achieving remission.

SUMMARY

Background Acquired hemophilia A is a severe bleeding disorder that requires fast and accurate diagnosis as it occurs often unexpectedly in previously healthy men and women of every age. The Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay is the diagnostic reference standard for detecting neutralizing autoantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII), but is not widely available, not ideal for quantifying the complex type 2 inhibitors seen in acquired hemophilia, and suffers from high inter-laboratory variability. Objectives To assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of FVIII-binding antibodies as detected by ELISA compared with the Nijmegen Bethesda assay. Methods Samples from the time of first diagnosis and clinical data were available from 102 patients with acquired hemophilia enrolled in the prospective GTH-AH 01/2010 study. Controls (n = 102) were matched for gender and age. Diagnostic cut-offs were determined by receiver-operator curve analysis. The prognostic value was assessed in 92 of the 102 patients by Cox regression analysis of time to partial remission. Results Anti-FVIII IgG above the 99th percentile (> 15 arbitrary units per mL) revealed high sensitivity and specificity (both 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.0) for diagnosing acquired hemophilia. The likelihood of achieving partial remission was related to anti-FVIII IgG concentration (< 300 arbitrary units, 1.0; 300-1050, 0.65; > 1050, 0.39). The Bethesda titer was only associated with the likelihood of partial remission when analyzed in the central laboratory, but not when data from local GTH study sites were used. Conclusion Although the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay is the reference standard for demonstrating neutralizing antibodies, the detection of FVIII-binding antibodies by ELISA is similarly sensitive and specific for diagnosing acquired hemophilia. In addition, anti-FVIII IgG may provide prognostic information.