Self-rated health and general procrastination in nurses: a cross-sectional study

Evaluating the effectiveness of a brief digital procrastination intervention targeting university students in Sweden: study protocol for the Focus randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The concept of procrastination can be described as a conscious, yet irrational, postponement of important tasks or decisions-despite awareness that the delay may lead to negative consequences. Procrastination behaviours are common among university students and is often described as a failure of self-regulation, and the behaviour is associated with stress, symptoms of depression and anxiety, poorer academic performance and negative effects on overall health and well-being.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A two-arm, parallel groups (1:1), single-blind randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of a brief digital procrastination intervention (Focus) among university students in Sweden. The intervention consists of a screening and feedback component based on Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS) score, allowing intervention participants to assess their current procrastination behaviours and receive behaviour change advice. Participants in the control group will be shown their total PPS score without any further feedback. Monte Carlo simulations (assuming a standardised effect of 0.35 Cohen's d of the intervention on the primary outcome, to at least 80% of the time estimate a posterior probability of effect of at least 95%) indicated that data from 1000 participants are required for analysis, meaning that 2000 participants are required to be randomised when assuming a 50% attrition rate. The primary outcome will be procrastination behaviour measured at 2 months postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes will be anxiety and stress symptoms and lifestyle behaviours. Outcomes will be analysed using multilevel regression models estimated using Bayesian inference.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority on 2022-08-24 (dnr 2022-00353). Students will be asked to give informed consent before participation and after having been given information about the study. The results will be submitted for publication in open access, peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN13533793.

What Predict Self-rated Health: A Cross-sectional Study Among Men and Women with Non-cardiac Chest Pain

The study aimed to determine different lifestyle and clinical factors that predict self-rated health (SRH) in non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) patients. In this cross-sectional study, 360 NCCP patients filled out questionnaires about depression, somatization, body sensation, type D personality, and pain intensity. In addition, participants' lifestyle and socio-demographic data were obtained. Multiple regression analyses revealed that among men, pain intensity (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03, 1.12), depression (3.10; 1.38, 9.18), somatization (1.18; 1.08, 1.29) and sleep quality (6.23; 1.42, 27.27) were associated with self-rated health. In women NCCP patients, depression (2.44; 1.05, 6.82) pain intensity (1.05; 1.01, 1.10), and physical activity (2.21; 1.07, 5.55) were associated with SRH. The results on the predicting factors of SRH in NCCP patients provide potential insights for more advanced clinical management of NCCP. In addition, they can be applied to improve health policies and promote healthy behaviors among NCCP patients.

Prevalence and influencing factors of depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant workers in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rural-to-urban migrant workers are a large group in China, and they are often more prone to mental health problems, especially depression. We expected to use meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and the influencing factors of depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant workers in China.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, PsycARTICLES, CNKI, Wan Fang, CBM, and Cochrane were searched on October 16, 2021. The data were analyzed using OR and random effect model in Revman5.3 and STATA 15 Software.

RESULTS

We included 30 studies involving 43,884 rural-to-urban migrant workers. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant workers in China was 0.28 (95% CI:0.22, 0.34); Results of the meta-analysis showed that working hours, sleep status, self-rated health, financial condition, job satisfaction, marriage, and social support were correlated with depressive symptoms.

LIMITATIONS

The systematic review and meta-analysis included only cross-sectional studies, and more types of original studies on depressive symptoms of rural-to-urban migrant workers in China should be carried out in the future.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant workers in China is 28%. Government departments can intervene early in the process to promote the mental health of this group based on influencing factors of depressive symptoms among rural-to-urban migrant workers in China.

Health symptoms and impacts of work on nursing professionals in a public hospital

OBJECTIVE

To relate self-reported health symptoms and the impacts of work in terms of physical, social, and psychological illness in nursing professionals.

METHOD

Cross-sectional, correlational study carried out in a public hospital in the southern region of Brazil. A sample of nursing professionals who worked in direct care participated in the study. A social-occupational questionnaire of self-reported health symptoms and the Work-Related Damage Assessment Scale were used. The analysis was descriptive and analytical. Chi-square test and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used, with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

A total of 308 professionals participated, with a prevalence of physical illness and higher means for pain in the body, legs and back. Significant relations were identified among the social-occupational variables, health symptoms, and physical, social or psychological illness. High and moderate correlations among the factors investigated were evidenced.

CONCLUSION

The impact of work on nursing professionals' health is evidenced by the association between self-reported health symptoms and illness, especially the physical or social one, and reinforces the need for professional awareness over situations that are harmful to health.