Acute antithrombotic effect of a front-loaded regimen of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerosis on aspirin

Treatment Effect of Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin Within 12 Hours of Acute Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the benefits and safety associated with the combination therapy of clopidogrel and aspirin among minor stroke or transient ischemic attack patients treated within 12 hours.

Methods and Results

This was a subanalysis of the CHANCE (Clopidogrel in High‐Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) trial, mainly limited to the prespecified group of patients randomized within 12 hours to either the combination of clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin alone. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke during 90‐day follow‐up. Recurrent ischemic stroke and progressive ischemic stroke were analyzed. Multivariable Cox modeling showed that randomization within 12 hours was an independent predictor of ischemic stroke events (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.25 [1.04–1.49], P=0.02). Among 2573 patients randomized within 12 hours, 282 (10.96%) patients had ischemic stroke events. Among them, 158 (12.34%) of 1280 patients taking aspirin experienced ischemic stroke compared with 124 (9.59%) of 1293 patients taking clopidogrel–aspirin (P=0.02). The dual antiplatelet was more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (6.57% versus 8.91%, P=0.03) but not progressive ischemic stroke (3.02% versus 3.43%, P=0.28). There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic events (P=0.39).

Conclusions

Among patients treated within 12 hours, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke during the 90‐day follow‐up and did not increase the hemorrhagic risk.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00979589.

Antiplatelet Treatment in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary and Cerebrovascular Disease

Ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease remain major health problems with associated mortality and quality-of-life consequences. Antiplatelet agents, including thienopyridines and the new P2Y12 inhibitors, have been shown to improve survival in the secondary prevention setting. We review the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of previous established as well as novel antithrombotic agents in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a special focus on cerebrovascular disease.

Preserved thrombin-inducible platelet activation in thienopyridine-treated patients

BACKGROUND

Abundant thrombin generation may be a major reason for subsequent thromboembolic events in patients with cardiovascular disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. We therefore investigated the susceptibility of thienopyridine responders and nonresponders to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-6- and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet activation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Response to clopidogrel or prasugrel was determined by the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 317 patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease. Baseline, TRAP-6-, and ADP-inducible P-selectin expression, activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) and monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation were measured as sensitive parameters of platelet activation.

RESULTS

In patients with high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity (HRPR), baseline P-selectin expression, GPIIb/IIIa and MPA formation were similar to those in patients without HRPR (all P > 0.05). After platelet activation with TRAP-6 or ADP, patients with HRPR by both assays exhibited significantly higher levels of P-selectin expression, GPIIb/IIIa and MPA formation than patients with an adequate thienopyridine-mediated platelet inhibition (all P ≤ 0.02). However, high levels of TRAP-6-inducible P-selectin, GPIIb/IIIa and MPA formation also occurred in 20.4%, 19.1% and 20.1% of the good responders by the VASP assay, and in 19.6%, 16.6% and 20.6% of the good responders by MEA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Thienopyridine nonresponders are more susceptible to thrombin- and ADP-inducible platelet activation than patients with good platelet inhibition. However, even patients with adequate thienopyridine-mediated platelet inhibition often show a preserved responsiveness to thrombin. These patients may benefit from additional thrombin receptor blockage or inhibition of thrombin generation.

Development of a perfusion chamber assay to study in real time the kinetics of thrombosis and the antithrombotic characteristics of antiplatelet drugs

Background

Arterial thrombosis triggered by vascular injury is a balance between thrombus growth and thrombus fragmentation (dethrombosis). Unbalance towards thrombus growth can lead to vascular occlusion, downstream ischemia and tissue damage.

Here we describe the development of a simple methodology that allows for continuous real time monitoring and quantification of both processes during perfusion of human blood under arterial shear rate conditions. Using this methodology, we have studied the effects of antiplatelet agents targeting COX-1 (aspirin), P2Y₁₂ (2-MeSAMP, clopidogrel), GP IIb-IIIa (eptifibatide) and their combinations on the kinetics of thrombosis over time.

Results

Untreated samples of blood perfused over type III collagen at arterial rates of shear promoted the growth of stable thrombi. Modulation by eptifibatide affected thrombus growth, while that mediated by 2-MeSAMP and aspirin affected thrombus stability. Using this technique, we confirmed the primacy of continuous signaling by the ADP autocrine loop acting on P2Y₁₂ in the maintenance of thrombus stability. Analysis of the kinetics of thrombosis revealed that continuous and prolonged analysis of thrombosis is required to capture the role of platelet signaling pathways in their entirety. Furthermore, studies evaluating the thrombotic profiles of 20 healthy volunteers treated with aspirin, clopidogrel or their combination indicated that while three individuals did not benefits from either aspirin or clopidogrel treatments, all individuals displayed marked destabilization profiles when treated with the combination regimen.

Conclusions

These results show the utility of a simple perfusion chamber technology to assess in real time the activity of antiplatelet drugs and their combinations. It offers the opportunity to perform pharmacodynamic monitoring of arterial thrombosis in clinical trials and to investigate novel strategies directed at inhibiting thrombus stability in the management of cardiovascular disease.

Antiplatelet therapy in elderly patients

With remarkable advances of medical care, the aging population is growing rapidly. Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly people and therefore antiplatelet therapy has been a mainstay of cardiovascular medicines for reducing and preventing cardiovascular risk in these populations. The benefits of several antiplatelet drugs in the elderly are well documented. However, there are limited data regarding the optimal use of antiplatelet agents considering the risk:benefit ratio in elderly patients, who are more vulnerable to safety issues owing to different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as compared with young patients. In this article, we review currently available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy (i.e., aspirin, old and new P2Y12 inhibitors and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) in the elderly for primary and secondary prevention strategies in cardiovascular care.

The influence of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet potency of clopidogrel evaluated by 5 different platelet function tests

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system to a variable degree and may therefore interact with the metabolism of clopidogrel to its active form. The conflicting data on this potential interaction may be due to the use of different PPIs and platelet function tests in recent studies. We therefore evaluated the influence of different PPIs on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel by 5 platelet function tests in the same population. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity was assessed in 230 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease by the light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay, multiple electrode aggregometry, and Impact-R. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity showed no significant differences between patients without (n = 95, 41.3%) and with PPI therapy (n = 135, 58.7%) in each test system (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, we observed no significant differences of ADP-inducible platelet reactivity between patients without PPIs and patients with pantoprazole (n = 95, 70.4%), esomeprazole (n = 22, 16.3%), omeprazole (n = 9, 6.65%), or lansoprazole (n = 9, 6.65%) (all P > 0.3). High on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with PPI therapy in each assay (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, concomitant treatment with PPIs did not attenuate the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy irrespective of the type of PPI and the used test system.

Review: Antiplatelet Drugs: What Comes Next?

Antiplatelet drugs are important components in the management of atherothrombotic vascular disease. However, several limitations restrict the safety and efficacy of current antiplatelet therapy in clinical practice. Interpatient variability and resistance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel has spurred efforts for the development of novel agents. Indeed, several antiplatelet drugs are at various stages of evaluation; those at advanced stage of development are the focus of this review.

Adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Until recently, there were hardly any data on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in advanced age. Like other metabolic processes, the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite may be impaired in older patients, leading to high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the age dependency of clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. We determined adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in 191 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

ADP-inducible platelet reactivity increased linearly with age after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, type of intervention, medication, C-reactive protein (CRP) and renal function [using LTA 0.36% of maximal aggregation per year, 95% CI 0.08-0.64%, P = 0.013; using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay 3.2 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) per year, 95% CI 1.98-4.41 PRU, P < 0.001]. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older compared with younger patients (P = 0.003 for LTA and P < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). Further, high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly more common among patients aged 75 years or older (P = 0.02 for LTA and P < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay).

CONCLUSION

ADP-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel. The clinical implications of these findings need to be addressed in future trials.

A new oral antiplatelet agent with potent antithrombotic properties: comparison of DZ-697b with clopidogrel a randomised phase I study

DZ-697b is a new orally active antiplatelet agent that inhibits collagen and ristocetin-mediated platelet activation. It does not require metabolisation to generate its active compound and has a safer profile than clopidogrel in pre-clinical studies. We compared the antithrombotic effects and bleeding time prolongations of three DZ-697b doses with clopidogrel 300 mg. In a four-treatment, three-period, crossover-design, 20 healthy subjects (31 + or - 7 years, 85% males) were randomised to single oral doses of DZ-697b (60, 120 and 360 mg), and clopidogrel (300 mg) (n=15 in each treatment with crossing-over). Antithrombotic effects were assessed by measuring six-hour post-dose changes from baseline in thrombus size in the Badimon chamber and platelet adhesion using Diamed Impact-R platelet function assay. Bleeding times were also measured pre-dose and at six hours post-dose. DZ-697b caused dose-dependent reductions in thrombus size at both high- and low-shear rates (mean reductions at 60, 120 and 360 mg doses of: 13.0%, 18.7%, 26.4% and 11.4%, 12.7%, 22.1% respectively, p<0.05 for all). Effect of clopidogrel (reductions of 18.7% and 11.0% respectively, p<0.05 for both) was closest to DZ-697b 120 mg. Reductions in platelet adhesion were also dose-dependent. Bleeding time ratio from baseline were shorter with DZ-697b versus clopidogrel (1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 versus 1.9, p<0.05 for all). The oral agent DZ-697b shows potent, dose-dependent, antithrombotic effects that are comparable to 300 mg clopidogrel at the 120 mg dose. Despite having equal or greater antiplatelet potency than 300 mg clopidogrel, bleeding time prolongations are significantly shorter with DZ-697b.

Crushed clopidogrel administered via nasogastric tube has faster and greater absorption than oral whole tablets

OBJECTIVES

To compare the absorption of 300 mg clopidogrel administered crushed via nasogastric (NG) tube versus whole tablets taken orally in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND

Earlier antiplatelet therapy has proven benefits in treatment of myocardial infarction and in patients undergoing PCI. Aspirin can be delivered early in crushed form via NG tube after CABG surgery to prevent graft occlusion. If clopidogrel given crushed via NG tube provides faster absorption, it could allow earlier clopidogrel loading.

METHODS

Nine healthy human subjects (34.7 +/- 11.1 years, 5 males) were given 300 mg clopidogrel in crushed form via NG tube with 30 mL water after 8 hours of fasting. Plasma levels of the primary circulating inactive clopidogrel metabolite SR26334 were measured after 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours of dosing. Following >or=2 week washout, same subjects swallowed 300 mg clopidogrel (four 75 mg tablets) after an 8-hour fasting and SR26334 levels were measured at the same time points.

RESULTS

Plasma SR26334 concentrations peaked earlier after crushed delivery than after oral intake (44 vs. 70 minutes, P = 0.023) and the median peak was 80% higher (13,083 vs. 7,255 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.021). At 40 minutes, area under the curve was almost twofold greater with NG administration than oral administration (geometric means ratio = 0.5299, 95% CI = 0.28-0.99, P = 0.048), but was similar over the 24-hour period with both administration methods (geometric means ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.84-1.32, P = 0.646).

CONCLUSIONS

A 300 mg loading dose of crushed clopidogrel administered via NG tube provides faster and greater bioavailability than an equal dose taken orally as whole tablets. The clinical benefits of this strategy need to be investigated.

Antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients with aspirin therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions--limited inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor

INTRODUCTION

Large individual variability in clopidogrel responses has been reported. However, mechanisms of the non-responsiveness are unclear. Our aim was to study the extent of platelet inhibition at the receptor level by in vitro receptor antagonists of P2Y(12) (AR-C69931MX, cangrelor) and P2Y(1) (adenosine 3',5'diphosphate) in aspirin treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to and after in vivo clopidogrel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

51 aspirin-treated (100 mg/day) patients participated. Blood was collected before and after administration of clopidogrel at 300 mg loading dose on day one, followed by 75 mg/d for four days. Aggregation in platelet-rich plasma was assessed.

RESULTS

In 20% of patients clopidogrel failed to inhibit platelet responses to ADP. These non-responders had also decreased sensitivity to an in vitro P2Y(12)-receptor antagonist compared with the responders (mean inhibition of aggregation 25 vs. 32%, difference of means 7% (95% CI 2-12%), P<0.02). Moreover, the P2Y(12)-receptor inhibition by in vivo clopidogrel correlated with the inhibition by in vitro ARMX measured prior to administration of clopidogrel. Neither P2Y(1)-receptor activity, thrombin generation while on aspirin nor basal platelet activity associated with clopidogrel responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant aspirin and clopidogrel treatment failed to suppress platelet activity in 20% of patients. Non-responders to clopidogrel had decreased responses also to another ADP receptor antagonist, which suggests that the impaired response occurs at the level of P2Y(12)-receptor.

Use of antiplatelet agents for prevention of ischemic stroke

Overall management to lower risk for ischemic stroke is multifaceted. Management includes measures to treat risk factors for accelerated atherosclerosis and stroke, antithrombotic therapies to lower the risk for thromboembolism, and surgery to treat a defined arterial or cardiac lesion. Treatment decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, with most patients receiving some combination of medication and recommendations for lifestyle modification. Some patients will also undergo surgical or endovascular interventions. This article discusses antithrombotic treatment for ischemic stroke prevention, placing major emphasis on the indications for and administration of antiplatelet therapy.

Optimizing platelet P2Y12 inhibition for patients undergoing PCI

Guidelines recommend that dual antiplatelet therapy using aspirin and clopidogrel should be administered to the majority of patients with acute coronary syndromes, including those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the results of a large randomized, placebo-controlled study suggest that a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel must be administered at least 15 h prior to PCI in order to achieve a significant reduction in peri-PCI thrombotic events. Other data suggest that 2 h of pretreatment may be sufficient if a 600-mg loading dose is used. Since it is often difficult to achieve an adequate pretreatment goal with clopidogrel in clinical practice, more rapid achievement of platelet P2Y(12) inhibition may improve patient outcomes. Prasugrel, [6-[2-(3,4-diflurophenyl) cyclopropyl1-1-y1] amino-2-propylthio-9-D-ribofuranosyl-9H-purine (AZD6140), and cangrelor are platelet P2Y(12) receptor antagonists currently in development that offer faster acting inhibition of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)--induced platelet aggregation. These agents act upon the same platelet receptor as clopidogrel, but are distinguished by their routes of administration, reversibility, and pharmacodynamic properties. Prasugrel is an orally administered agent that provides faster, higher, and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. The results of Phase II testing suggest that the risk of bleeding is similar in prasugrel- and clopidogrel-treated patients. AZD6140 is another orally administered platelet inhibitor with rapid and reversible action. Again, Phase II testing suggests similar bleeding risk for clopidogrel. Preliminary evidence suggests that clinical outcomes may be better in prasugrel- and AZD6140-treated patients than in clopidogrel-treated patients. Cangrelor is an intravenously administered, reversible, short-acting agent with a rapid onset of activity. Bleeding risk and clinical outcomes data are similar in cangrelor- and abciximab-treated patients. The results of ongoing Phase III clinical trials involving more than 40,000 patients will demonstrate whether these agents fulfill their potential to improve outcomes in PCI-treated patients by providing faster, higher, and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation.

Comparison of platelet function and morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin versus clopidogrel pretreatment and bivalirudin

We hypothesized that direct thrombin inhibition could attenuate platelet activation and release of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), a marker of inflammation, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To assess platelet function under flow conditions with bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), we employed the cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA) assay in drug-spiked blood samples from volunteers (n = 3) in vitro, and then in PCI patients who received bivalirudin alone (n = 20), UFH alone (n = 15), and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin (n = 15). Scanning electron microscopy was employed to image bivalirudin or UFH-treated platelets to determine whether platelet function observations had a morphologic explanation. Enzyme immunoassay was used to measure sCD40L levels in PCI patients. In vitro, bivalirudin decreased platelet surface coverage; UFH increased platelet surface coverage. In PCI patients, bivalirudin alone decreased platelet surface coverage, UFH alone increased platelet surface coverage, and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin additively reduced platelet surface coverage. Unlike UFH, bivalirudin did not activate platelets in SEM studies. Bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel significantly reduced plasma sCD40L in PCI patients. In conclusion, our findings suggest that under flow conditions, bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel may have an antiplatelet effect versus UFH alone during PCI. These data suggest that bivalirudin and UFH may confer an anti-inflammatory effect by reducing sCD40L during PCI.

Normalization of platelet reactivity in clopidogrel-treated subjects

BACKGROUND

Aspirin (ASA) + clopidogrel are commonly used in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but persistent antiplatelet effects may complicate surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To study the possibility of normalizing platelet reactivity after ASA + clopidogrel treatment, 11 healthy subjects received a 325-mg ASA + clopidogrel loading dose (300 or 600 mg dependent on study arm), followed by 81 mg of ASA + 75 mg of clopidogrel daily for 2 days. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) [challenged by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP)] and flow cytometry for platelet activation by GPIIb/IIIa receptor exposure pretreatment, 4 and 72 h postload. To normalize platelet reactivity, increasing amounts of pooled platelets from five untreated volunteers [volunteers (V)-platelet-rich plasma (PRP)] were added ex vivo to the subject's PRP (S-PRP). At both 4 and 72 h, 40% and 50% V-PRP were needed to overcome platelet disaggregation in the 300 or 600 mg arms, respectively, after ADP challenge; an additional 10% V-PRP fully normalized aggregation. Recovery of function was linear with each incremental increase of V-PRP. ADP-induced GPIIb/IIIa activation showed the same pattern as LTA (r = 0.74). Forty percent V-PRP was required to normalize platelet function to AA, collagen, and TRAP.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the pre-operative transfusion of 10 platelet concentrate units (the equivalent of 40% V-PRP) after a 300-mg clopidogrel loading or 12.5 units (50% V-PRP) after a 600 mg loading may adequately reverse clopidogrel-induced platelet disaggregation to facilitate postoperative hemostasis. An additional 2.5 units fully normalized platelet function. The potential clinical implications of our observations could include shorter hospitalizations and reduced bleeding complications. But these observations should be fully explored in an in vivo clinical setting with clopidogrel-treated patients before and after surgery.

The platelet inhibitory effects and pharmacokinetics of prasugrel after administration of loading and maintenance doses in healthy subjects

Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a novel thienopyridine, is a potent and orally active antiplatelet agent in vivo. The aims of this double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group phase 1 study were to investigate the antiplatelet effects of prasugrel after oral administration of a loading dose (LD) and subsequent 20 days of once-daily maintenance dosing (MD), to characterize the pharmacokinetics of prasugrel metabolites with an LD/MD regimen, and to assess the safety and tolerability of prasugrel in healthy subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to prasugrel 40 mg LD/7.5 mg MD (n = 11), prasugrel 60 mg LD/15 mg MD (n = 10), or placebo LD/placebo MD (n = 11). Prasugrel 40 and 60 mg LDs provided rapid and consistent inhibition of 20 microM adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-stimulated platelet aggregation. Prasugrel 7.5 and 15 mg MDs maintained inhibition in a dose-dependent manner. The pharmacokinetic data indicate that exposure to prasugrel metabolites occurs rapidly after dosing and is consistent with dose proportionality. Within the limitations of this study, the safety and tolerability results suggest that prasugrel is well tolerated when dosed as an initial LD followed by a lower daily MD for 20 days. Prasugrel LDs and MDs provide rapid and sustained inhibition of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation.

Update on Anticoagulant Medications for the Interventional Radiologist

For many years, available anticoagulant medications were limited to vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin, and aspirin. However, in the past 20 years, several new agents have been developed for the treatment of thrombosis, and even more are being developed. This increasing number of medications has led to more specific treatment algorithms for the care of venous and arterial thrombotic events. As more agents become available, treatment guidelines are rapidly changing. With increasing frequency, interventional radiologists encounter patients already taking anticoagulant medications prophylactically or therapeutically, or they need to determine which anticoagulant medications need to be initiated for a particular procedure. Therefore, it has become increasingly important to understand the mechanisms, risks, and benefits of anticoagulant medications. A review of the traditional anticoagulants, their new counterparts, and their places in the medication repertoire of interventional radiology will be discussed herein.

Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-initiated acute thrombosis and coronary embolization are fundamental in the pathophysiology of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cangrelor (formerly AR-C69931MX) is a novel, rapidly acting, intravenous, specific antagonist of platelet aggregation via binding to the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor subtype. The primary aims of this study were to assess the initial safety and pharmacodynamics of cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

In part 1, patients undergoing PCI were randomized to an 18- to 24-hour of either placebo, 1-, 2-, or 4-microg/kg per minute cangrelor in addition to aspirin and heparin beginning before PCI. In part 2, patients were randomized to receive either cangrelor (4 microg/kg per minute) or abciximab before PCI. The primary end point was the composite incidence of major and minor bleeding through 7 days. Secondary end points included the occurrence of major adverse coronary events (death, MI, and unplanned repeat coronary intervention) through 30 days plus ex vivo platelet aggregation and bleeding times.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (3 dosage groups and placebo) were studied in part 1, and 199 additional patients were then randomized in the second part, comparing 1 dose of cangrelor and abciximab. Combined major and minor bleeding occurred in 13% of those receiving cangrelor and in 8% in those randomized to placebo (P = non significant [NS]) during part 1 and in 7% receiving cangrelor compared with 10% randomized to abciximab (P = NS), during part 2. The 30-day composite incidence of adverse cardiac events was similar between those receiving cangrelor and those receiving abciximab during part 2 (7.6% vs 5.3%, respectively, P = NS). Mean inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to 3 micromol/L ADP at steady state was 100% for both cangrelor 4 microg/kg per minute and abciximab groups in part 2. After termination of infusion, platelet aggregation returned to baseline response more rapidly with cangrelor compared with abciximab. There was a trend toward longer bleeding time prolongation and lower platelet count with abciximab compared with cangrelor.

CONCLUSIONS

This initial experience with intravenous cangrelor during PCI suggests an acceptable risk of bleeding and adverse cardiac events while achieving rapid, reversible inhibition of platelet aggregation via competitive binding to the ADP P2Y12 platelet receptor with less prolongation of bleeding time then the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab.

Optimal Timing for the Initiation of Pre-Treatment With 300 mg Clopidogrel Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the optimal timing of a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients enrolled in the Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial.

BACKGROUND

A loading dose of clopidogrel before a PCI has become relatively commonplace, although the data supporting this practice are limited and sometimes conflicting.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either 300 mg clopidogrel or a matching placebo administered a minimum of 3 h and a maximum of 24 h before PCI. The primary 28-day combined end point was death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization. Linear splines were used to summarize the effect of the time of pre-treatment as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

A total of 1,762 patients were evaluated. For patients randomized to placebo, there was no relationship between the duration of pre-treatment and the occurrence of the primary end point, whereas longer durations of pre-treatment in patients randomized to clopidogrel were associated with improved outcomes. The event rates diverged maximally at 24 h. The difference in outcomes between placebo and clopidogrel pre-treated patients was not significant until > or =15 h pre-treatment, with a 58.8% (p = 0.028) reduction in the primary end point in patients pre-treated with clopidogrel > or =15 h compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

When a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel is used, little benefit is obtained compared with just 75 mg at the time of the PCI when the treatment duration is <12 h. In patients pre-treated for longer durations, the optimal duration seems to approach 24 h.

Antiplatelet agents and arterial thrombosis

There is an increase in arterial thrombotic events in the elderly. Elderly patients are more likely to have associated diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, and when age is confounded by these other predisposing factors, the risk of an arterial ischemic event increases disproportionately. Antithrombotic therapy for geriatric patients is underused, even when one adjusts for potential drug contraindications. This article focuses on the action of the currently available antiplatelet agents--aspirin, clopidogrel, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) receptor antagonists, and assesses their effects in different disease states, with special attention to data that examine the geriatric population.

Can N-acetylcysteine reverse the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel? An in vivo and vitro study

BACKGROUND

The active metabolite of clopidogrel binds the P2Y12 ADP receptor on the platelet surface via a disulfide bond. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is able to reduce disulfide bonds. We postulated that NAC might reverse clopidogrel's effect on platelets.

METHODS

Two groups of patients were investigated. Group 1 included 11 patients with stable coronary disease who, after discontinuation of aspirin, received 14 days of clopidogrel, 75 mg/day. Bleeding time and whole-blood platelet aggregometry (with 5 micromol/L ADP) were compared before and after the 14 days. Patients were then treated with 6 g of NAC orally, followed by repeat measurement of bleeding time and aggregometry. In group 2, 14 patients were treated with clopidogrel (300 mg) and aspirin before a percutaneous coronary intervention. Blood was drawn 22 +/- 3 hours later and divided into 2 samples. One was sent immediately for platelet-rich plasma aggregometry (using 5 and 2 micromol/L ADP, collagen, and arachidonic acid as agonists), thromboelastography, and aggregometry using the Plateletworks assay (Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, Tex). The other sample was treated with NAC (500 mg/L), after which these same platelet function tests were performed.

RESULTS

In group 1, NAC therapy did not significantly change the bleeding time or results of aggregometry. In group 2, neither aggregometry nor the Plateletworks assay suggested reversal of inhibition by NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies reveal that a large dose of NAC does not reduce inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel in vitro or in vivo.

Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Heart Disease

Platelets play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis. Rupture of a coronary artery plaque creates a nidus for platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, which may result in vessel occlusion and subsequent myocardial infarction or death. Despite conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, the risk of recurrent ischemic events remains high. More potent antiplatelet agents have therefore been developed, including the thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel. By irreversibly blocking the platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor, these drugs powerfully inhibit platelet activation, degranulation, and aggregation. Large clinical trials have demonstrated that combination antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin significantly reduces the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The optimal loading dose and length of treatment, however, are yet to be firmly established, and there is a need to clearly identify those patients who will benefit most from additional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition.

The Plastic Surgeon??s Guide to Drugs Affecting Hemostasis

The plastic surgeon is encountering an unprecedented population of aging individuals who both desire cosmetic or reconstructive surgery and may require the use of medications that alter hemostasis. The increasing use of anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors in particular can create challenges for the plastic surgeon. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the surgeon with the medications that can affect hemostasis and to suggest strategies for their use in the perioperative period. Specific case examples are presented.

Randomized clinical trial of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin-clopidogrel combination versus aspirin alone after lower limb angioplasty

BACKGROUND

There is a high risk of reocclusion after successful lower limb angioplasty. Platelets play a central role in this process. The aim of this study was to investigate the antiplatelet effect of a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel compared with aspirin alone in patients with claudication undergoing endovascular revascularization.

METHODS

This was a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Some 132 patients were randomized to clopidogrel and aspirin or placebo and aspirin, with a loading dose 12 h before endovascular intervention. Flow cytometric measurements of platelet fibrinogen binding and P-selectin expression were taken as measures of platelet function at baseline, 12 h after the loading dose, and 1 h, 24 h and 30 days after intervention.

RESULTS

Within 12 h of the loading dose, platelet activation in the clopidogrel group had decreased (P-selectin by 27.3 per cent, P = 0.017; fibrinogen binding by 34.7 per cent, P = 0.024; stimulated fibrinogen binding by 49.2 per cent, P < 0.001). No change was observed in the placebo group. Platelet function in the clopidogrel group was significantly suppressed compared with baseline at 1 h, 24 h and 30 days after endovascular intervention (stimulated fibrinogen binding by 53.9, 51.7 and 57.2 per cent respectively; all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A combination of clopidogrel and aspirin inhibited platelet function more than aspirin alone in patients with claudication before and after angioplasty.

Interventional cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: current issues

In the last decade, a variety of novel anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents that improve outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization have emerged. During the next decade, continued refinements in catheter-based device technology should lead to further increases in the number of interventional procedures. The use of optimal antithrombotic strategies is pivotal in reducing adverse events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our purpose is to review the current evidence regarding the efficacy of available adjunctive anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents in treating patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. It should be borne in mind that patients undergoing PCI in the midst of an acute coronary event require a different level of coagulation and platelet aggregation inhibition than low-risk patients undergoing elective PCI for stable angina pectoris. Similarly, generalizing antithrombotic regimen safety data to a wide spectrum of catheter-based therapeutic devices should be avoided. A level of anticoagulation that is safe and effective for angioplasty and stent placement may not be sufficient for devices with longer intracoronary dwell times such as brachytherapy catheters. In light of current evidence, activated clotting times should be targeted in the 200- to 250-second range during elective PCI and in the 250- to 300-second range when intervening on a higher-risk lesion, such as one with an angiographically visible thrombus or in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Low-dose enoxaparin sodium is an attractive antithrombin strategy in PCI because it is intrinsically adjusted for renal function, age, and concomitant glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist use. Other low-molecular weight heparins have also been studied as adjunctive anticoagulants during cardiac catheterization. For example, in pilot studies, dalteparin sodium was shown to have a good safety profile when used alone or in combination with abciximab during PCI.A wealth of data supports the use of a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist in patients presenting with ACS, especially those with high-risk features such as elevated cardiac markers; the systematic use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in this population is therefore encouraged. Overall, the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduces the incidence of thrombotic complications following PCI, is associated with a mortality benefit, but has no impact on the risk of restenosis.

Antiplatelet Agents: Current Drugs and Future Trends

Antiplatelet drugs in clinical use are discussed in terms of their mechanisms of action and the relevancy of that to the physiology of platelets and the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis. Current clinical usage is outlined in detail for each drug. Experimental antiplatelet drugs also are discussed.

Identification of low responders to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Although patients undergoing coronary stenting routinely receive dual antiplatelet treatment to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis, this undesired event still occurs. A suboptimal response to clopidogrel treatment (low responders) has been suggested to contribute to stent thrombosis. In the present study, platelet function profiles were assessed in patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving a standard 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose with the aim to identify low clopidogrel responders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry following 6 microM ADP stimuli in 48 patients before and 10 min, 4 and 24 h after receiving clopidogrel front-loading. Patients having > or =40% inhibition of platelet aggregation 24 h after clopidogrel administration were defined as normal responders, whereas those having <40% inhibition were low responders. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed by whole blood flow cytometry following 2 microM ADP stimuli at the same time points. Platelet function profiles were compared between normal and low clopidogrel responders.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (56%) were normal responders and 21 (44%) low responders. Baseline GP IIb/IIIa activation was higher in low responders (74.6+/-16.6% vs. 58.2+/-24.5%, p=0.03). Although GP IIb/IIIa activation reduced following clopidogrel front-loading in both groups, it remained increased among low responders at 24 h (58.6+/-21.3% vs. 40.2+/-28.7%, p=0.05) and during the overall study time course (p=0.02). There were no differences in P-selectin expression.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of patients have an early suboptimal response to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose. An increased GP IIb/IIIa activation before intervention may identify this group of patients suggesting the use of a more aggressive antithrombotic treatment in these individuals.

Influence of treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization

OBJECTIVES

We examined clinical outcomes in the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) trial based on the duration of pretreatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND

The influence of the treatment duration with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary revascularization on early outcomes remains uncertain.

METHODS

Among 2,159 patients with coronary disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the ISAR-REACT trial, we examined clinical outcomes relative to the duration of pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel: (2 to 3 h, 3 to 6 h, 6 to 12 h, or >12 h). Patients were randomly assigned to adjunctive therapy with abciximab or placebo at the beginning of the study. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization within 30 days after randomization.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between patient groups regarding the duration of pretreatment, irrespective of assignment to abciximab or placebo (p = 0.27 for interaction among abciximab/clopidogrel and placebo/clopidogrel treatment at each time interval). Occurrence of major bleeding also did not differ according to time of initial clopidogrel dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

For low-to-intermediate risk patients treated with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel before PCI, incremental clinical benefit within the first 30 days from durations of pretreatment >2 to 3 h was not evident.

Advances in antiplatelet therapy

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. These disorders share a common pathophysiology -- atherosclerosis, which affects various arterial beds, leading to protean manifestations (coronary artery disease [CAD], stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD]). The platelet plays a pivotal role in the perpetuation and clinical expression of these disorders. The platelet, once believed to have a role confined to modulation of thrombosis and haemostasis, also plays an active role in vascular inflammation. Antiplatelet agents have become first-line therapy for CVD, and their unequivocal benefits are demonstrated in various basic and experimental models and supported by overwhelming evidence from clinical trials. Search is underway for more effective and safer antiplatelet therapy. Novel therapies are emerging to target the redundant pathways of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance implementation of existent therapy, target therapy selectively to high-risk patients and to those likely to respond (pharmacogenomics), and study the incremental benefits and safety of various antiplatelet combinations and their interaction with other medications in patients with CVD treated with polypharmacy.

Pyridoxine as a template for the design of antiplatelet agents

The B(6) vitamers have been shown to display beneficial therapeutic effects in cardiovascular related disorders. The design of novel antiplatelet agents using pyridoxine as a template has led to the discovery of a class of novel cardio- and cerebro-protective agents. The present study describes the synthesis of several of these derivatives along with the antiplatelet and antiischemic activity of derivative 16.

A clinical trial of abciximab in elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Whether the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab is beneficial in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 2159 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention: 1079 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive abciximab and 1080 patients to receive placebo. All patients were pretreated with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least two hours before the procedure. The primary end point of the trial was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target-vessel revascularization within 30 days after randomization.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point was 4 percent (45 patients) in the abciximab group, as compared with 4 percent (43 patients) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.59; P=0.82). Most adverse events were myocardial infarctions: the incidence was 4 percent (40 patients) in the abciximab group and 4 percent (41 patients) in the placebo group (P=0.91). Twelve patients (1 percent) in the abciximab group and eight patients (1 percent) in the placebo group had major bleeding complications (P=0.37). Profound thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 patients (1 percent) in the abciximab group but in none in the placebo group (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that in patients at low-to-intermediate risk who undergo elective percutaneous coronary intervention after pretreatment with a high loading dose of clopidogrel, abciximab is associated with no clinically measurable benefit within the first 30 days.

Antiplatelet drugs

Antiplatelet drugs protect against myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death and other serious vascular events in patients with a history of previous vascular events or known risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Aspirin reduces the risk of serious vascular events in patients at high risk of such an event by about a quarter and is recommended as the first-line antiplatelet drug. Clopidogrel reduces the risk of serious vascular events among high-risk patients by about 10% compared with aspirin. It is as safe as aspirin, but much more expensive. It is an appropriate alternative to aspirin for long-term secondary prevention in patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, have experienced a recurrent vascular event while taking aspirin, or are at very high risk of a vascular event (>/= 20% per year). Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin reduces the risk of serious vascular events among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes by 20%, and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by 30%, compared with aspirin alone. Addition of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist to aspirin reduces the risk of vascular events among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes by 10% and among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by 30%, compared with aspirin alone; it appears to provide incremental benefit in patients also treated with clopidogrel. Addition of dipyridamole to aspirin seems to be more effective than aspirin alone for preventing recurrent stroke, but its overall effect in preventing serious vascular events in patients with ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack has not been determined.

[Clopidogrel and thrombopenia. A case report]

We report our experience with a case of isolated profound thrombocytopenia after clopidogrel (thienopyridine) administration. No adverse event such as bleeding or thrombotic event had occurred, although clopidogrel has been discontinued two weeks after the coronary artery stenting. Despite the safety of clopidogrel, this case demonstrates that clopidogrel can be associated not only with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura but also with isolated thrombocytopenia.

Utility of platelet adp receptor antagonism in the emergency department: a review

Emergency physicians are often the first clinicians to evaluate patients with acute atherothrombotic events. Platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists, by specifically and irreversibly blocking ADP-induced platelet activation and aggregation, may reduce the injury associated with this process and can prevent recurrent ischemic events. Their role in the prevention of recurrent vascular events has been well documented. Recently, the CURE Trial showed that the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel improved outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Familiarity with ADP receptor antagonists and knowledge about their appropriate use is important to the emergency physician in the management of ACS and potentially in that of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), ischemic strokes, and acute peripheral arterial obstruction. This review addresses the pathophysiology of atherothrombosis and evaluates the potential use of ADP receptor antagonists in the Emergency Department setting.