Dosimetric measurements in isolated human coronary arteries: comparison of commercially available iridium(192) with strontium/yttrium(90) emitters

Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation

PURPOSE

Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10-30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness.

METHODS

EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm.

RESULTS

Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.

Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease

BACKGROUND

Interventional treatment of arteries that are narrowed and obstructed by atherosclerosis involves either bypassing the blockage using a graft; widening the artery from the inside with a balloon, a procedure known as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); or providing a strut to hold the vessel open, known as a stent. All of these treatments are, however, limited by the high numbers that fail within a year. Intravascular brachytherapy is the application of radiation directly to the site of vessel narrowing. It is known to inhibit the processes that lead to restenosis (narrowing) of vessels and grafts after treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of, and complications associated with, intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) for maintaining patency after angioplasty or stent insertion in native vessels or bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched their Specialised Register (last searched August 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 7).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of the use of brachytherapy as an adjunct to the endovascular treatment of people with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or stenosed bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries versus the procedure without brachytherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and two other review authors independently extracted the data. Adverse event information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials with a combined total of 1090 participants were included in this review. All included studies used the femoropopliteal artery. We did not identify any studies that used the iliac arteries. All studies compared PTA with or without stenting plus IVBT versus PTA with or without stenting alone. No trials were found comparing IVBT to technologies such as drug eluting stents or balloons, or cryoplasty. Follow-up ranged from six months to five years. The quality of the included trials was moderate with our concerns relating to the difficulty of blinding due to the nature of the procedures and the small sample sizes for some studies. Primary outcomes (patency or restenosis and need for re-intervention) were reported in the majority of the trials, but reporting at various time points and the use of multiple definitions of the outcomes by the included studies meant that not all data were available for pooling. The secondary outcomes were not reported in many of the included studies.For brachytherapy, cumulative patency was higher at 24 months (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 4.10, n = 222, P = 0.002). A statistically significant difference was found for restenosis at six months (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.66, n = 562, P = 0.004), 12 months (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68, n = 375, P = 0.0002) and 24 months (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78, n = 164, P = 0.007) in favour of IVBT. No difference was found after five years as measured in one study. The need for re-interventions was reported in six studies. Target lesion revascularisation was significantly reduced in trial participants treated with IVBT compared with angioplasty alone (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97, P = 0.04) at six months after the interventions. No statistically significant difference was found between the procedures on the need for re-intervention at 12 and 24 months after the procedures.A statistically significant lower number of occlusions was found in the control group at more than three months (OR 11.46, 95% CI 1.44 to 90.96, n = 363, P = 0.02) but no differences were found at less than one month nor at 12 months after the procedures making the clinical significance uncertain. Ankle brachial index was statistically significantly better for IVBT at the 12 month follow-up (mean difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.14, n = 100, P = 0.02) but no statistically significant differences were found at 24 hours and at six months.Quality of life, complications, limb loss, cardiovascular deaths, death from all causes, pain free walking distance and maximum walking distance on a treadmill were similar for the two arms of the trials with no statistically significant difference found between the treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for using peripheral artery brachytherapy as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to maintain patency and for the prevention of restenosis in people with peripheral vascular disease is limited, mainly due to the inconsistency of assessment and reporting of clinically relevant outcomes. More data are needed on clinically relevant outcomes such as health related quality of life (HRQOL) or limb salvage and longer-term outcomes, together with comparisons with other techniques such as drug eluting balloons and stents. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials, health economics and cost-effectiveness data are required before the procedure could be recommended for widespread use.

Quantification of dose perturbation by plaque in vascular brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Dose prescription and reporting in vascular brachytherapy (VBT) is based on the assumption that the vessel wall is water equivalent, which does not consider a possible dose perturbation by plaque. As the extent of this perturbation is unknown, we aimed to quantify dose attenuation by atherosclerotic plaque for beta- and gamma-radiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The dose delivered from Strontium-90/Yttrium-90 ((90)Sr/Y) and Iridium-192 ((192)Ir) sources with and without human peripheral arteries ((90)Sr/Y: n = 38, (192)Ir: n = 7) surrounding the respective delivery catheter was determined with radiochromic films. Plaque and vessel wall thickness were measured using light microscopy. From the ratio-attenuated doseunattenuated dose (dose perturbation factor: DPF) we determined averaged attenuation coefficients for atherosclerotic plaque (micro(P)) and the residual part of the vessel wall (micro(W)) by regression analysis based on the function DPF = exp(-micro(P) * plaque thickness -micro(W) * residual wall thickness).

RESULTS

Attenuation in case of (192)Ir was less than the measurement uncertainties. For beta-radiation correlation was found by discrimination between calcified and noncalcified plaque. Classifying noncalcified plaque as normal arterial tissue, the regression coefficient was r = 0.845 at micro(P)= 0.5356 mm(-1) and micro(W) = 0.0663 mm(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular brachytherapy with beta radiation in calcified arteries results in significant dose attenuation within the vessel wall, which can be calculated on knowing the vascular morphometry. Thus, plaque thickness should be taken into account in treatment planning and retrospective analyses.

Dose perturbation of a novel cobalt chromium coronary stent on P32 intravascular brachytherapy: A Monte Carlo study

Intravascular brachytherapy has been adopted for the indication of in-stent restenosis on the basis of results of clinical trials using mainly stainless steel stents. Recently, a new stent made of cobalt-chromium L-605 alloy (CoCr, p=9.22 g/cm3) (MULTI-LINK VISION) was introduced as an alternative to the 316L stainless steel stent design (SS, p=7.87 g/cm3) (MULTI-LINK PENTA). In this work, we used the Monte Carlo code MCNPX to compare the dose distribution for the 32P GALILEO source in CoCr and SS 8 mm stent models. The dose perturbation factor (DPF), defined as the ratio of the dose in water with the presence of a stent to the dose without a stent, was used to compare results. Both stent designs were virtually expanded to diameters of 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm using finite element models. The complicated strut shapes of both the CoCr and SS stents were simplified using circular rings with an effective width to yield a metal-to-tissue ratio identical to that of the actual stents. The mean DPF at a 1 mm tissue depth, over the entire stented length of 8 mm, was 0.935 for the CoCr stent and 0.911 for the SS stent. The mean DPF at the intima (0.05 mm radial distance from the strut outer surface), over the entire stented length of 8 mm, was 0.950 for CoCr, and 0.926 for SS. The maximum DPFs directly behind the CoCr and SS struts were 0.689 and 0.644, respectively. All DPF estimates have a standard deviation of +/-0.6%(k=2), approximating the 95% confidence interval. Although the CoCr stent has a higher effective atomic number and greater density than the SS stent, the DPFs for the two stents are similar, probably because the metal-to-tissue ratio and strut thickness of the CoCr stent are lower than those of the SS stent.

Basic treatment planning parameters for a 90Sr / 90Y source train used in endovascular brachytherapy

Working groups of the AAPM, DGMP, and ESTRO have published recommendations for endovascular brachytherapy, introducing concepts of relevant parameters for dose specification and treatment planning. However, the procedures for this treatment remain often mainly based on trial protocols and manufacturer instructions. Treatment planning requires the essential knowledge of the radial and longitudinal dose distribution, as well as information about geometrical uncertainties. The present study includes a whole data set for daily clinical practice using a commercially available device for endovascular brachytherapy (Novoste Betacath). The dose distribution around the 90Sr seed train was calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithms and verified by film dosimetry. The radial dose profile was determined starting from the surface of the delivery catheter Calculated dose profiles were in good agreement to measured values. The geometrical uncertainties were estimated with a retrospective analysis of 51 patient treatments. This shows the importance of using a safety margin of at least 10 mm between Intervention Length and Reference Isodose Length. Based on the longitudinal dose profile and the necessary safety margins, the maximum treatable intervention length is 25 mm and 45 mm for a 40 mm and 60 mm source train, respectively.

β-Radiation for the Creation of Linear Lesions in the Canine Atrium

Background— Creating linear lesions is important for the treatment of arrhythmias such as atrial flutter and fibrillation. Making these lesions with standard radiofrequency catheters can be difficult and may result in charring and thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate β-radiation as a novel energy source for creating linear myocardial lesions.

Methods and Results— Eight dogs with intact conduction across the cavotricuspid isthmus were studied. The isthmus was irradiated (25 to 50 Gy) with strontium/yttrium-90 delivered via a deflectable 7F catheter (Novoste Corporation). There were no immediate effects, but bidirectional conduction block developed during follow-up studies in 7 of 8 dogs. The dog without conduction block received 25 Gy. After the animals were euthanized, histology revealed transmural, linear areas of fibrosis without any thrombus.

Conclusions— β-Radiation can safely and effectively create linear lesions that are contiguous and nonthrombogenic. This energy source may become an interesting adjunct to radiofrequency for the treatment of atrial flutter and fibrillation.

Human coronary morphology after beta radiation brachytherapy of in-stent restenosis

This case report discusses the human coronary morphological findings 18 hours after brachytherapy (beta radiation) of an in-stent restenosis. Brachytherapy produced aseptic inflammation of the periadventitial connective tissue integrating the vasa vasorum in the acute phase. The stent neointima eight months after stenting and acutely 18 hours after radiation consisted of the same cellular components as human stent neointima of specimen not additionally treated with radiation. No evidence of necrosis or excessive fibrotic alterations of the arterial vessel wall have been found.

Comparison of the angiographic outcomes after beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy for treatment of in-stent restenosis

This study was designed to compare the angiographic outcomes of beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy (VBT). We reviewed the angiographic results of 636 lesions (212 that underwent beta and 212 that underwent gamma VBT, and 212 that received placebo) with native coronary in-stent restenosis matched for lesion length, vessel size, preprocedure minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and time to angiographic follow-up in the various randomized clinical trials and studies. Baseline lesion complexity was similar in these 3 groups. Final MLD was smaller in the beta VBT group than in the gamma VBT or placebo group. At follow-up, beta and gamma VBT significantly reduced both angiographic restenosis (34.4% for beta VBT, 26.4% for gamma VBT, and 50.9% in the placebo group; p <0.0001) and recurrent lesion length (9.2 mm for beta VBT, 8.4 mm for gamma VBT, and 15.5 mm placebo, p <0.0001) compared with placebo. Gamma VBT was associated with a greater reduction in restenosis outside the stent than beta VBT. By multivariable analysis, independent angiographic predictors of treated segment restenosis included beta or gamma VBT, lesion length, and vessel size. In matched lesions, beta and gamma VBT achieved similar reductions in treated segment restenosis and recurrent lesion length compared with placebo.