Intracoronary radiation therapy improves the clinical and angiographic outcomes of diffuse in-stent restenotic lesions: results of the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial for Long Lesions (Long WRIST) Studies

Coronary intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis: A review of the contemporary literature

Intracoronary stent restenosis (ISR) is a clinically relevant challenge in the modern era. Heterogeneity in patient- and lesion-specific factors can further compound this clinical challenge. Coronary intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) was the standard therapeutic approach for ISR prior to the advent of drug-eluting stents (DES). Despite prospective data describing the superiority of DES over IVBT for treating de novo ISR, IVBT remains a treatment option for patients with complex disease. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the historical and contemporary literature surrounding IVBT in order to elucidate its role in modern cardiac care and to describe opportunities for future investigations to improve patient selection. Herein, we provide a review of the contemporary literature describing IVBT as a safe and effective treatment option for patients with recurrent, refractory ISR after multilayer DES and no good surgical or mechanical option. Combination therapy with emerging technologies such as DCBs may further increase efficacy.

Management of in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains the most common cause of stent failure after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent data suggest that ISR-PCI accounts for 5-10% of all PCI procedures performed in current clinical practice. This State-of-the-Art review will primarily focus on the management of ISR but will begin by briefly discussing diagnosis and classification. We then move on to detail the evidence base underpinning the various therapeutic strategies for ISR before finishing with a proposed ISR management algorithm based on current scientific data.

Conundrums of coronary brachytherapy

PURPOSE

In the 1998-2005 heyday of intravascular coronary brachytherapy, a variety of delivery devices were developed and marketed. As the industry shrank, only one device, the Novoste Beta-Cath 3.5F System (Best Vascular, Norcross, GA) remained in commercial production. The 2008 instruction manual, the only official source of technical guidance, lacks recommendations for various common scenarios.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The clinical conundrums described here were encountered during regular use of the Novoste system in 81 patients treated from January to December of 2020 in the course of using the Novoste device in accordance with the 2008 manufacturer's instruction manual. Our experience and strategies are reported and critiqued.

RESULTS

Ambiguous patient selection factors include vein grafts, multiple affected vessels, large vessels, retreatment, multiple overlapping stents and prior radiation. Procedural ambiguities include vessel size determination, proper prescription dose, very long lesions and eccentric source positioning. Potential procedural mishaps include stuck sources and the risk of contamination.

CONCLUSIONS

The Novoste intravascular coronary brachytherapy system is the only commercially available brachytherapy delivery catheter, and may remain so for some time. The issues detailed here provide insight and guidance for current users and may prompt research into areas lacking adequate information.

Linear Micro-patterned Drug Eluting Balloon (LMDEB) for Enhanced Endovascular Drug Delivery

In-stent restenosis (ISR) often occurs after applying drug eluting stents to the blood vessels suffering from atherosclerosis or thrombosis. For treatment of ISR, drug eluting balloons (DEB) have been developed to deliver anti-proliferative drugs to the lesions with ISR. However, there are still limitations of DEB such as low drug delivery efficiency and drug loss to blood flow. Although most researches have focused on alteration of drug formulation for more efficient drug delivery, there are few studies that have attempted to understand and utilize the contact modality of DEB drug delivery. Here, we developed a linear micro-patterned DEB (LMDEB) that applied higher contact pressure to enhance drug stamping to vascular tissue. Ex vivo and in vivo studies confirmed that higher contact pressure from micro-patterns increased the amount of drug delivered to the deeper regions of vessel. Finite element method simulation also showed significant increase of contact pressure between endothelium and micro-patterns. Quantitative analysis by high performance liquid chromatography indicated that LMDEBs delivered 2.3 times higher amount of drug to vascular tissue in vivo than conventional DEBs. Finally, efficacy studies using both atherosclerotic and ISR models demonstrated superior patency of diseased vessels treated with LMDEB compared to those treated with DEB.

The-374T/A Variant of the Rage Gene Promoter is Associated with Clinical Restenosis after Coronary Stent Placement

Upregulation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) may play a crucial role in neointimal formation upon vessel injury. The −374T/A variant of the RAGE gene promoter, which has been associated with an altered expression of the cell-surface receptor, could exert a protective effect toward the development of vascular disease. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of this common genetic variant in the occurrence of clinical in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation. The −374T/A polymorphism of the RAGE gene promoter was evaluated by PCR-RFLPs in 267 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary stent implantation and a subsequent coronary angiography 6–9 months later for suspected restenosis. In-stent restenosis was assessed by means of quantitative angiography. Carriers of the-374AA genotype showed a significantly reduced risk of developing restenosis after percutaneous transluminal intervention than non-carriers. To determine whether the protective effect of the homozygous AA genotype toward clinical restenosis was independent of potential confounders, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis. After allowance for clinical and biochemical risk factors and stent length, the AA genotype remained significantly associated with a reduced prevalence of in-stent restenosis. No relation was evident between the RAGE genotype and established cardiovascular risk factors. In conclusion, the −374AA genotype of the RAGE gene promoter could be associated with a reduced risk of in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

The role of renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension

OPINION STATEMENT

Resistant hypertension remains a difficult clinical disease to treat. It is known to place a patient at higher risk for developing significant cardiovascular, renal, and cerebrovascular disease. There is a current surge in research investigating renal denervation as potential treatment for resistant hypertension, as an overactive renal sympathetic system is known to exert an influence on the underlying pathophysiology. Several small studies have been published, with more underway, evaluating multiple different catheter-based systems that utilize radiofrequency ablation or ultrasound wave energy. These studies are showing promising results, with reduction in office blood pressure for the majority of patients. However, it appears that this does not always translate into definitive real-world observational effects. Variability exists in the number of patients that are able to reduce the amount of medication they take for hypertension, with some requiring an increase in medication. As a result, a more intensive screening process has been proposed, evaluating specific key predictors that may translate into a more favorable clinical response to renal denervation. We recommend that individuals with resistant hypertension continue to be optimized medically, adequately screened for secondary causes of hypertension, and that they consider participation in a renal denervation clinical trial to aid in further advancing the field.

Sympathetic renal denervation: hypertension beyond SYMPLICITY

Despite a wide range of drug treatment for hypertension, resistant hypertension rates remain high. The Symplicity™ Renal Denervation System (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA), which creates renal nerve denervation, has shown initial success in lowering blood pressure among patients with resistant hypertension. Given the enormous market for this treatment approach, an estimated two dozen other companies are pursuing technologies with alternative approaches. Despite this fact, very little has been published on preclinical and clinical experience with these new devices. The current review summarizes the most prominent technologies in the pipeline and provides insight into the mechanism of action, preclinical, and clinical experience with these new devices.

Current treatment of in-stent restenosis

Management of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains an important clinical problem. Although drug-eluting stents (DES) have drastically reduced the incidence of ISR, treatment of DES-ISR is particularly challenging. ISR mainly results from aggressive neointimal proliferation, but recent data also suggest that neoatherosclerosis may play an important pathophysiological role. Intracoronary imaging provides unique insights to unravel the underlying substrate of ISR and may be used to guide repeated interventions. In this paper, we systematically reviewed clinical trial data with currently available therapeutic modalities, including DES and drug-coated balloons, in patients presenting with ISR within bare-metal stents or DES.

The sirolimus-eluting Cypher Select coronary stent for the treatment of bare-metal and drug-eluting stent restenosis: insights from the e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) registry

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the 1-year safety and efficacy of Cypher Select or Cypher Select Plus (Cordis Corporation, Bridgewater, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with the treatment of bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) in nonselected, real-world patients.

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of consistent data on DES for the treatment of ISR, especially, DES ISR.

METHODS

The e-SELECT (Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance) registry is a Web-based, multicenter and international registry encompassing virtually all subsets of patients and lesions treated with at least 1 SES during the period from 2006 to 2008. We enrolled in this pre-specified subanalysis all patients with at least 1 clinically relevant BMS or DES ISR treated with SES. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis rate at 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 15,147 patients enrolled, 1,590 (10.5%) presented at least 1 ISR (BMS group, n = 1,235, DES group, n = 355). Patients with DES ISR had higher incidence of diabetes (39.4% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.001), renal insufficiency (5.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.003), and prior coronary artery bypass graft (20.5% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001). At 1 year, death (1.4% for BMS vs. 2.1% for DES, p = 0.3) and myocardial infarction (2.4% for BMS and 3.3% for DES, p = 0.3) rates were similar, whereas ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization and definite/probable late stent thrombosis were higher in patients with DES ISR (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.003, and 1.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SES for either BMS or DES ISR treatment is safe and associated with low target lesion revascularization recurrence and no apparent safety concern.

A dual-inhibition study on vascular smooth muscle cells with meclofenamic acid and β-irradiation for the prevention of restenosis

PURPOSE

Restenosis is still one of the major limitations after angioplasty. A therapeutic treatment combining β-irradiation and pharmacologic cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition was employed to study the impact on vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effects of meclofenamic acid in combination with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) on cell growth, clonogenic activity, cell migration, and cell cycle distribution of human aortic SMCs were investigated. Treatment was sustained over a period of 4 days and recovery of cells was determined until day 20 after initiation. The hypothesis was that there is no difference between control and treated groups.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent growth inhibition was observed in single and combined treatment groups for meclofenamic acid and β-irradiation. Cumulative radiation dosage of 8 Gy completely inhibited colony formation. This was also observed for 200 μM meclofenamic acid alone or in combination with minor β-irradiation dosages. Results of the migration tests showed also a dose dependency with additive effects of combined therapy. Meclofenamic acid 200 μM alone and with cumulative β-irradiation dosages resulted in an increased G2/M-phase share.

CONCLUSIONS

Incubating human SMCs with meclofenamic acid and (90)Y for a period of 4 d (ie, 1.5 half-life times) resulted in an effective inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration.

Target lesion revascularization after wingspan: assessment of safety and durability

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In-stent restenosis (ISR) occurs in approximately one-third of patients after the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerotic lesions with the Wingspan system. We review our experience with target lesion revascularization (TLR) for ISR after Wingspan treatment.

METHODS

Clinical and angiographic follow-up results were recorded for all patients from 5 participating institutions in our US Wingspan Registry. ISR was defined as >50% stenosis within or immediately adjacent (within 5 mm) to the implanted stent and >20% absolute luminal loss.

RESULTS

To date, 36 patients in the registry have experienced ISR after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan. Of these patients, 29 (80.6%) have undergone TLR with either angioplasty alone (n=26) or angioplasty with restenting (n=3). Restenting was performed for in-stent dissections that occurred after the initial angioplasty. Of the 29 patients undergoing TLR, 9 required >/=1 interventions for recurrent ISR, for a total of 42 interventions. One major complication, a postprocedural reperfusion hemorrhage, was encountered in the periprocedural period (2.4% per procedure; 3.5% per patient). Angiographic follow-up is available for 22 of 29 patients after TLR. Eleven of 22 (50%) demonstrated recurrent ISR at follow-up angiography. Nine patients have undergone multiple retreatments (2 retreatments, n=6; 3 retreatments, n=2; 4 retreatments, n=1) for recurrent ISR. Nine of 11 recurrent ISR lesions were located within the anterior circulation. The mean age for patients with recurrent anterior circulation ISR was 57.9 years (vs 81 years for posterior circulation ISR).

CONCLUSIONS

TLR can be performed for the treatment of intracranial Wingspan ISR with a relatively high degree of safety. However, the TLR results are not durable in approximately 50% of patients, and multiple revascularization procedures may be required in this subgroup.

Utility of drug-eluting stents in complex lesions and high-risk patients

Drug-eluting stents represent a breakthrough technology designed to deliver high concentrations of a bioactive agent locally to an atherosclerotic lesion, thereby minimizing systemic side effects of the drug. The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents have clearly been demonstrated in noncomplex lesions. This article presents an evidence-based analysis of the current experience with CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stents (Cordis Corp., Miami Lakes, FL) and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) in a broad spectrum of high-risk and/or complex subsets of patients and lesions, including those with diabetes mellitus, multivessel disease, diffuse disease, very small vessels, lesions in saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, in-stent restenosis, ostial and bifurcation lesions, unprotected left main disease, and acute myocardial infarction. Emerging data in several of these subsets suggest that drug-eluting stents are safe and effective, and their use may currently be recommended, whereas in other groups of patients and lesions the efficacy and/or safety of drug-eluting stents remains to be determined, thus warranting caution. It is anticipated that penetration of drug-eluting stents will continue to increase, and fewer patients will require surgical revascularization to achieve sustained event-free survival.

Use of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to assess (i) the feasibility, safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in treating in-stent restenosis (ISR), (ii) the risk factors for recurrent ISR, and (iii) the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

METHODS

Between May 2002 and April 2004, 100 consecutive patients with evidence of myocardial ischaemia and 112 ISRs in native coronary arteries were treated using SESs. We evaluated the rate of procedural and clinical success, the incidence of in-hospital and long-term MACE, the recurrence rate of ISR after 6-8 months, and the risk factors for recurrent ISR and follow-up MACE.

RESULTS

Forty-five percent of the lesions were directly stented. After stent implantation, the minimal lumen diameter increased from 0.51 +/- 0.32 to 2.50 +/- 0.32 mm in the stents and to 2.30 +/- 0.35 mm in the lesions (acute gain 1.99 +/- 0.37 mm). The procedural success rate was 99%. The clinical success rate was 88%. MACE occurred in 2.0% of patients during hospitalisation and in 12.8% after a median follow-up of 15.1 months (interquartile range 8.4-19.7). The recurrence rate of ISR was 11.8% after a median follow-up of 7.7 months (interquartile range 7.4-8.4). The risk for recurrent ISR was significantly higher in patients with diabetes or hypertension, in those aged more than 65 years and in female patients, as well as in the lesions with a small minimal lumen diameter. Three-vessel disease and age were risk factors for MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of using SESs to treat ISR, and identifies a risk profile for recurrent ISR and MACE.

Photodynamic Therapy Reduces Intimal Hyperplasia in Prosthetic Vascular Bypass Grafts in a Pig Model

BACKGROUND

Bypass surgery has a failing frequency of 30% during the first year, mainly due to intimal hyperplasia (IH). This negative effect is most pronounced in artificial grafts. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a technique in which light activates photosensitizer dyes to produce free-radicals resulting in an eradication of cells in the vascular wall. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of PDT to reduce IH in a preclinical porcine PTFE bypass model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten pigs were used. After a pilot PDT dosimetry study (n=3) PTFE grafts were bilaterally placed into the circulation as bypasses from the common to the external iliac arteries (n=7). The right sides served as controls (C). Before implantation of the left grafts, the arterial connecting sites of the left distal anastomoses were PDT-treated. The arteries were pressurized at 180 mmHg for 5 minutes with the photosensitizer Methylene Blue (330 microg/ml), and thereafter endoluminally irradiated with laser light (lambda = 660 nm, 100 mW/cm(2), 150 J/cm(2)). After 4 weeks the specimens were retrieved and formalin fixed. Cross sections through the midportions of the distal anastomoses and the grafts were used for histology, immunohistochemistry to identify inflammatory cells and morphometric evaluation (n=7).

RESULTS

No systemic side effects and no graft occlusions were noted. PDT-treated anastomoses showed reduced IH in the mid-portions of the anastomoses (Area of IH: microm(2)/microm graft: C: 6970+/-1536, PDT: 2734+/-2560; P<0.005) as well as in the grafts (C: 5391+/-4031, PDT: 777+/-1331; P<0.02). The number of inflammatory cells per microscopic field was increased after PDT (C: 24+/-16, PDT: 37+/-15; P<0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant PDT, performed in an endovascular fashion, was a safe method to reduce prosthetic graftstenosis in a preclinical setting. This study underscores the clinical potential of PDT to inhibit the development of clinical bypass graftstenosis.

Comparison of six-month angiographic and three-year outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation versus brachytherapy for bare metal in-stent restenosis

To evaluate long-term effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for diffuse bare metal in-stent restenosis (ISR), we compared 6-month angiographic and long-term (3-year) clinical outcomes of SES implantation and intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT). SES implantation for diffuse ISR was performed in 120 consecutive patients and their results were compared with those from 240 patients treated with beta-radiation with balloons filled with rhenium-188 and mercaptoacetyltriglycine. The radiation dose was 15 or 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was 3-year major adverse cardiac events including myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and target lesion revascularization. The 2 groups were similar in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Lesion lengths were 25.1 +/- 14.2 mm in the SES group and 24.5 +/- 10.4 mm in the ICBT group (p = 0.15). In-stent acute gain was greater in the SES group than in the ICBT group (2.23 +/- 0.62 vs 1.91 +/- 0.54 mm, p <0.001). We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 287 patients (79.7%). In-segment angiographic restenoses were 7.4% (7 of 94) in the SES group and 26.4% (51 of 193) in the ICBT group (p <0.05). Two myocardial infarctions (1 in each group) and 5 deaths (4 in SES group, 1 in ICBT group) occurred during 3-year follow-up. At 3 years, survival rates without target lesion revascularization (94.1 +/- 2.2% vs 84.6 +/- 2.3%, p = 0.011) and major adverse cardiac events (92.5 +/- 2.4% vs 84.2 +/- 2.4%, respectively, p = 0.03) were higher in the SES than in the ICBT group. In conclusion, compared with ICBT, SES implantation for diffuse ISR is more effective in decreasing recurrent restenosis and improving long-term outcomes.

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing drug-eluting stents and vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a meta-analysis of randomised trials assessing the outcome of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) or DES for the treatment of coronary artery ISR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Studies utilising DES or VBT for ISR were identified by a systematic search. Data was pooled and combined overall effect measures were calculated for a random effect model in terms of deaths, myocardial infarctions, revascularisation, binary restenosis, mean late luminal loss and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Fourteen eligible studies (3103 patients) were included. Neither therapy had any effect on mortality or myocardial infarction rate. VBT reduced the rate of revascularisation (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.50-0.68), MACE (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.51-0.67), binary restenosis (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.44-0.59) and late loss (-0.73 mm, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.55 mm) compared to balloon angioplasty and selective bare metal stents (BMS) alone at intermediate follow-up and MACE (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.61-0.85) at long-term follow-up. DES reduced the rate of revascularisation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71), MACE (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.79) and binary restenosis (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.81) compared to VBT but follow-up was limited to 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

VBT improves the long-term outcome of angioplasty compared with BMS alone in the treatment of ISR. DES appears to provide similar results to that of VBT during short-term follow-up.

Randomized comparison between intracoronary β-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients.

RESULTS

Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.

Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES

We sought to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents for bare-metal in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Although there is clinical evidence that drug-eluting stents are associated with better results than other treatments for in-stent restenosis, they are not yet approved for this indication. Meta-analysis of randomized trials may yield more precise estimates of treatment effects and enable a rapid adoption of effective treatments in clinical practice.

METHODS

Data sources included PubMed and conference proceedings. Prespecified criteria were met by 4 randomized studies comparing sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents versus balloon angioplasty or vascular brachytherapy in 1,230 patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis. Studies reported the clinical outcomes of efficacy and safety during a minimum of 9 months. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

No significant heterogeneity was found across trials, thus showing a similar effect size regardless of the use of balloon angioplasty or vascular brachytherapy as comparators. The risk of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.49; p < 0.001) and that of angiographic restenosis (odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.49; p = 0.001) were markedly lower in patients treated with drug-eluting stents. There were no differences between patients treated with drug-eluting stents and those treated with other techniques with respect to the composite of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.03; p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-eluting stents are markedly superior to conventional techniques (balloon angioplasty and vascular brachytherapy) and should be considered as first-line treatment for patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of intracoronary gamma- and beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis

We assessed the effectiveness of intracoronary brachytherapy and compared treatment effects for the two radiation sources as well as the performance of the procedure in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and native coronary arteries. Five randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary brachytherapy with placebo involving a total of 1310 patients were reviewed for a meta-analysis. Risk differences (RD) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and angiographic binary restenosis at 6-12 months were computed, and a meta-regression analysis of MACE was performed. For MACE, the RD was 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09%-0.29%; P value, 0.00); there was significant between-study variance of 0.2395. In univariate meta-regression analyses, diabetes was a significant factor for the between-study variance (P value, 0.000). In multivariate meta-regression analyses adjusted for diabetes and lesion length, neither gamma-radiation source nor SVG was a significant factor for the between-study variance (P value, 0.675 and 0.433, respectively); the adjusted between-study variance was 0.000. Intra-coronary brachytherapy is effective compared with placebo at mid-term follow up. Neither procedure in SVG (gamma radiation) nor difference in radiation source (beta or gamma) in native coronary arteries was a significant factor in brachytherapy effectiveness compared to placebo.

Comparison between drug-eluting stents and beta-radiation for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis: clinical and angiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Initial reports on drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) show very good outcomes. Nevertheless, few data are available on direct comparison with intracoronary brachytherapy (IBT). The aim of this study was to compare brachytherapy and DES in treatment of diffuse ISR.

METHODS

One hundred forty-one consecutive patients with diffuse ISR were treated with IBT (68 patients; beta (90Sr/90Y) emitters) or with DES (73 patients; 32 with sirolimus-eluting and 41 with paclitaxel-eluting stents). Angiographic and clinical follow-up was scheduled within 9 months.

RESULTS

The first 74 lesions were treated with IBT (group 1) and the latter 74 with DES (group 2). The two groups were well matched for clinical/angiographic characteristics. At follow-up, restenosis rates were 37.8% (28/74) in IBT group and 14.9% (11/74) in DES group (P = .0028). A diffuse pattern of recurrence was more frequent after IBT (20/74 vs 6/74, P = .005). A worse outcome after IBT was associated with the "edge effect," accounting for most failures. Recurrence within the original restenotic stent was similar in both groups (12.9% vs 14.9% in groups 1 and 2 respectively, P = .8).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-eluting stents are more effective than IBT with beta-irradiation in reducing recurrence rates after treatment of diffuse ISR. In case of failure, the pattern of restenosis is more benign after treatment with DES.

Repeat intracoronary beta-brachytherapy using a rhenium-188-filled balloon catheter for recurrent restenosis in patients who failed intracoronary radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Conventional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in restenotic lesions after brachytherapy failure is associated with a high recurrence rate of restenoses and revascularizations. Intracoronary brachytherapy using a liquid rhenium-188-filled balloon in de novo or restenotic lesions safely and effectively reduced restenosis rates. We report clinical and angiographic data regarding the safety and efficacy of rhenium-188 brachytherapy in restenoses after brachytherapy failure.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with restenosis after brachytherapy failure received rhenium-188 beta-brachytherapy. Follow-up was performed angiographically after 6 months and clinically after 12 months. Primary clinical endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as any death, myocardial infarction or repeat revascularization in the target vessel within 12 months. Secondary angiographic endpoints were the binary restenosis rate and late loss in the total segment including edge effects at 6 months.

RESULTS

The prescribed dose of 22.5 Gy (n=12) or 30 Gy (n=2) was successfully delivered in all patients. In two lesions, a bare-metal stent was implanted. The mean length of the irradiated segment was 40.0+/-15.7 mm. The mean diameter of the irradiation balloon was 2.96+/-0.37 mm. Angiographic follow-up was done in 13 of 14 patients. There was no edge stenosis or coronary aneurysm. Within the total segment, late loss was 0.39+/-0.64 mm and late loss index was 0.18+/-0.40 with a binary restenosis rate of 23%. Twelve months' clinical follow-up was available in all patients, which showed a MACE rate of 7% due to one target lesion revascularization (TLR).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary beta-brachytherapy with a liquid rhenium-188-filled balloon in restenoses after intracoronary radiation therapy failure including 12 months combined antiplatelet therapy is safe with respect to vessel thrombosis, late coronary occlusion or aneurysm formation. With limited use of stenting, angiographic and clinical follow-up for repeat brachytherapy were favorable and it is associated with low restenosis and target vessel revascularization rate.

Effectiveness and safety of sirolimus stent implantation for coronary in-stent restenosis: the TRUE (Tuscany Registry of Sirolimus for Unselected In-Stent Restenosis) Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in consecutive unselected patients undergoing coronary intervention in a real-world scenario.

BACKGROUND

Restenosis after bare metal stenting is characterized by a high rate of re-restenosis once treated with repeated percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

The study was designed as a prospective two-center registry. We enrolled 244 patients with ISR in a native coronary artery or saphenous vein graft who had clinical indication for repeat intervention.

RESULTS

Sirolimus stent implantation was successful in all lesions. At 9-month follow-up, death occurred in 4 (1.6%) patients, myocardial infarction in 4 (1.6%), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 12 (4.9%), for a cumulative event-free survival of 227 (93%). Although 9-month follow-up angiography was planned in all patients, only 150 (62%) patients completed it, and restenosis was present in 13 (8.7%) patients. Diabetes and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome at presentation were the only independent predictors of freedom from ischemia-driven TLR and major adverse cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus stent implantation for the treatment of ISR is effective and safe. In diabetic patients and in those with acute coronary syndrome, the higher rate of recurrence requires further evaluation.

Intracoronary β-brachytherapy using a rhenium-188 filled balloon catheter in restenotic lesions of native coronary arteries and venous bypass grafts

PURPOSE

We have previously demonstrated the efficacy of intracoronary beta-brachytherapy using a liquid (188)Re-filled balloon in a randomised trial including de novo lesions. Percutaneous coronary interventions in restenotic lesions and in stenoses of venous bypass grafts are characterised by a high recurrence rate for restenosis and re-interventions. Against this background, we wanted to assess the impact of intracoronary beta-brachytherapy using a liquid (188)Re-filled balloon in restenotic lesions in native coronary arteries and venous bypass grafts.

METHODS

In 243 patients, beta-brachytherapy with 22.5 Gy was applied at a tissue depth of 0.5 mm. Patients were followed up angiographically after 6 months and clinically for 12 months. The primary clinical endpoint was the incidence of MACE (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularisation). Secondary angiographic endpoints were late loss and binary restenosis rate in the total segment.

RESULTS

All irradiation procedures were successfully performed. A total of 222 lesions were in native coronary arteries; 21 were bypass lesions. Mean irradiation length was 41.6+/-17.3 mm (range 20-150 mm) in native coronary arteries and 48.1+/-33.9 mm (range 30-180 mm) in bypass lesions; the reference diameter was 2.57+/-0.52 mm and 2.83+/-0.76 mm, respectively. There was no vessel thrombosis during antiplatelet therapy. Angiographic/clinical follow-up rate was 84%/100%. MACE rate was 17.6% in the native coronary artery group and 38.1% in the CABG group (p<0.03). Binary restenosis rate was 22.5% and 55.6% (p<0.01), and late loss was 0.38+/-0.72 mm and 1.33+/-1.11 mm (p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that intracoronary beta-brachytherapy with a liquid (188)Re-filled balloon using 22.5 Gy at a tissue depth of 0.5 mm in restenotic lesions is safe. It is associated with a low binary restenosis rate, resulting in a low occurrence rate of MACE within 12 months in restenotic lesions in native coronary arteries but not in vein grafts.

Six years experience in intracoronary brachytherapy procedures: patient doses from fluoroscopy

Typical patient dose levels during intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) procedures using beta sources were determined across a sample of 221 treatments. Dose-area product values, fluoroscopy time and number of frames per procedure, with median values of 62 Gy cm2, 17.0 min and 1493 images, respectively, resulted in a 20% to 50% increase in the values measured for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures in the same medical centre (median values 41 Gy cm2, 14.3 min and 1078 images). Likely reasons for this increase include the additional complexity of ICB, the need for recording and reporting every step of the treatment, getting the essential parameters for the volume determination of the lesion and therapeutic radiation dose calculation and, finally, the learning curve for this kind of procedure. A high concentration skin dose distribution during ICB procedures was measured and in 12% of the patients peak skin doses higher than 1.5 Gy were confirmed. 10 patients were submitted to clinical follow-up and skin injuries were not identified.

IVUS-based dosimetry on patients with repeat-radiated coronary arteries to the same site

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary radiation reduces recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR). Repeat radiation may become necessary due to recurrent ISR. This study reports outcome-related dose calculations for twice-radiated coronary artery segments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with angiographic evidence of ISR in a previously treated native coronary artery were assigned for repeat percutaneous coronary intervention and intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). Intravascular brachytherapy was performed either with a 192Ir- or a 90Sr/Y-source (prescription dose: 14-18 and 23 Gy each at 2 mm from the center of the source), or a 32P-source (20 Gy 1-mm deep to the vessel wall). The mean time interval between the two IVBT treatments was 394+/-306 days. For each patient, angiograms and intravascular ultrasound cross sections were reviewed, on the basis of anatomical landmarks, matched, and the twice-radiated vessel segment identified.

RESULTS

Clinical follow-up at 379+/-146 days revealed a target vessel revascularization rate of 18.2% and a target lesion revascularization rate of 13.6%. One death was reported. Maximal dose and average dose at the endothelium were 261 and 124+/-72.3 Gy, and maximal dose and average dose at the adventitia-media border were 159 and 50.3+/-29.3 Gy. Fourteen patients had 1.71 times longer recurrence-free interval compared to the interval between both IVBT treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat IVBT to the same ISR site is safe without any adverse clinical events at an average 12 months' follow-up. A second IVBT treatment led to a prolonged ISR-free survival for the majority of patients. The choice of isotope did not influence outcome.

Restenosis following implantation of bare metal coronary stents: pathophysiology and pathways involved in the vascular response to injury

This review summarizes the restenotic process that occurs after the implantation of bare metal coronary stents. The pathology of in-stent restenosis is distinct from that seen after balloon angioplasty and is characterized by neointimal proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition. The degree of neointimal proliferation is proportional to the amount of injury, the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate and the association of stent struts with lipid-filled plaque. In-stent restenosis also appears to be associated with systemic markers of inflammation. Shear stress has an important influence on restenosis as does the presence and adhesiveness of vascular progenitor cells. Clinical predictors (e.g., artery size, stent length, diabetes, and gender) may affect the incidence of restenosis seen after stent placement. A number of catheter-based interventions have been used to treat in-stent restenosis. Although preliminary data suggest that the use of drug-eluting stents may be effective, only intracoronary radiation has shown consistent efficacy in randomized trials.

Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management

In-stent restenosis is the limiting entity following coronary stent implantation. It is associated with significant morbidity and cost and thus represents a major clinical and economical problem. Worldwide, approximately 250 000 in-stent restenotic lesions per year have to be dealt with. The pathophysiology of instent restenosis is multifactorial and comprises inflammation, smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation and extracellular matrix formation, all mediated by distinct molecular pathways. Instent restenosis has been recognised as very difficult to manage, with a repeat restenosis rate of 50% regardless of the mechanical angioplasty device used. Much more favourable results were reported for the adjunctive irradiation of the in-stent restenotic lesion, with a consistent reduction of the incidence of repeat in-stent restenosis by 50%. Data from the first clinical trials on drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis have shown very much promise yielding this strategy likely to become the treatment of choice. This review outlines the histological and molecular findings of the pathophysiology, the epidemiology, the predictors and the diagnostic work-up of in-stent restenosis and puts emphasis on the various treatment options for its prevention and therapy.

Three-year follow-up after intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Most studies that proved intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) to be highly effective to reduce recurrent restenosis after treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) have looked at time periods up to 12 months. Whether the beneficial effect from radiation is sustained during long-term follow-up remains a concern. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of IRT using a beta-emitter during a 3-year follow-up period.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-eight consecutive symptomatic patients (mean age, 63 +/- 11 years) with 134 in-stent restenotic lesions were treated for ISR with IRT (noncentred beta-emitter, Novoste; radiation dosis 21.1 +/- 3.1 Gy). Six-month angiographic follow-up was obtained in 104 patients (81%) with 105 lesions (78%). All patients underwent 36-month clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Six-month angiographic restenosis rate was 22% in stent (29% in lesion) with an in-stent late loss of 0.49 +/- 0.62 mm. Target lesion resvascularization (TLR) at 6-month follow-up was performed in 23 cases (18%). MACE (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation) was observed in 24 patients (19%). At 36-month follow-up, TLR increased to 36 cases (28%) and MACE was observed in 47 patients (37%). In a multivariate analysis, minimal lumen diameter before treatment of ISR using IRT was the only predictor of recurrent TLR at 36 months (OR = 0.131; 95% CI, 0.068-0.254; p = 0.002). In a subgroup of patients (N = 15) without restenosis at 6-month angiography but with clinically driven recurrent late angiography (mean, 18 +/- 7 months); in-lesion late loss increased from 0.47 +/- 0.54 mm at 6 months to 1.27 +/- 0.76 mm at repeated angiography (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable number of delayed recurrent restenosis post IRT for ISR. This is due to ongoing late loss more than 6-month post IRT. The minimal lumen diameter before IRT predicts the need for recurrent TLR at 36 months.

Comparison between sirolimus-eluting stents and intracoronary catheter-based beta radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

We report the outcomes of patients who had in-stent restenosis (IRS) that was treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. The benefit of IVBT for treating ISR is well documented. SES implantation decreases first-time ISR and, in preliminary reports, has been used to treat ISR. Fifty consecutive patients who had ISR were treated; the first 25 patients underwent SES implantation and the next 25 patients were treated with IVBT using a beta-Cath System (a 40-mm strontium-90/yttrium-90 source). Quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up were performed at 5.2 +/- 1.1 and 12.1 +/- 1.2 months; clinical follow-up was performed at 15 months. SES deployment and IVBT were successful in all patients. At 12-month follow-up, 8 patients who underwent IVBT had angiographic recurrence (4 in the stent and 4 at the stent edge); only 1 patient who underwent SES implantation developed recurrent ISR. At 12 months, in-stent late luminal loss was similar between the SES and IVBT groups (0.35 +/- 0.45 vs 0.34 +/- 0.46 mm, p = 0.9); however, in-stent net luminal gain was higher in the SES group than in the IVBT group (1.32 +/- 0.13 vs 0.57 +/- 0.19 mm, p <0.0001), and in-lesion late luminal loss was higher in the IVBT group (0.48 +/- 0.32 vs 0.16 +/- 0.42 mm, p = 0.004). At 12 months, intravascular ultrasound stent volume obstruction was higher after IVBT versus than after SES implantation (38.7% vs 6.7%, p <0.0001). At 15-month clinical follow-up, 64% and 96% (p <0.01) of patients who underwent IVBT and SES implantation, respectively, were free of major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion SES implantation for the treatment of ISR was effective and superior to catheter-based IVBT in preventing recurrent neointimal proliferation and angiographic restenosis at 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes between rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon angioplasty followed by radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon in the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Rotational atherectomy (RA) and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) have been shown to effectively dilate in-stent restenosis (ISR). It is not known, however, which of these technique, when followed by beta-radiation, is more effective. Therefore, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing RA and CBA before beta-radiation therapy for diffuse ISR.

METHODS

Patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to receive RA (group 1, n = 58) or CBA (group 2, n = 55) before beta-radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, with the radiation dose being 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months, and the secondary end point was major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death, target lesion revascularization) at 9 months.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Mean lesion length was 21.0 +/- 11.2 mm in group 1 and 20.8 +/- 10.2 mm in group 2 (P = .77). Radiation was delivered successfully to all patients. We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 90 patients (80%). The rates of angiographic restenosis were 14.9% (7 of 47) in group 1 and 14.0% (6 of 43) in group 2 (P = .89). No patient experienced myocardial infarction or death during the 9-month follow-up period. Rates of target lesion revascularization or major adverse cardiac events were 3.4% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (P = .94) during the 9-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Either RA or CBA, followed by beta-radiation using a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, is equally safe and effective for diffuse ISR in 6-month angiographic and 9-month clinical outcomes.

Long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy (IRT).

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was retrospectively determined in 301 consecutive patients who were treated with IRT. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or any reintervention. Long term clinical outcome was obtained from an electronic database of hospital records and from questionnaires to the patients and referring physicians. Long term survival status was assessed by written inquiries to the municipal civil registries.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) follow up was 3.6 (1.2) years. The cumulative incidence of MACE at six months was 19.1%, at one year 36.4%, and at four years 58.3%. The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate at six months was 12.9%, at one year 28.3%, and at four years 50.4%. From multivariate analysis, dose < 18 Gy was the most significant predictor of TLR. At four years the cumulative incidence of death was 3.8%, of myocardial infarction 13.4%, and of coronary artery bypass surgery 11.3%. Total vessel occlusion was documented in 12.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long term follow up of patients after IRT, there are increased adverse cardiac events beyond the first six months.

Optimizing dosimetry with high-dose intracoronary gamma radiation (21 Gy) for patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intracoronary gamma radiation (IRT-gamma) in reducing recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) is well established using doses of 14-18 Gy. We sought to examine whether an escalation in dose to 21 Gy is safe and confers additional benefit in reducing repeat revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with diffuse ISR.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with diffuse ISR (lesion length 20-80 mm) in native coronary arteries (n=25) and saphenous vein grafts (n=22) underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and/or additional stents followed by IRT-gamma using the Checkmate system (Cordis) with a dose of 21 Gy. All patients were discharged with clopidogrel for 12 months and aspirin indefinitely. Six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to 120 patients treated with 18 Gy using the same system.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients in the 21-Gy group had more multivessel, vein graft disease and history of prior myocardial infarctions and coronary artery bypass grafts (P<.001). The use of debulking devices and stents was less in this group (P<.001). Procedural and in-hospital complications were similar. Follow-up at 6 months revealed nonsignificant but lower late loss (in-stent, 0.33+/-0.7 mm; in-lesion, 0.41+/-0.6 mm) in the 21-Gy group compared to the 18-Gy group; follow-up at 12 months revealed a trend toward less overall myocardial infarction, although repeat revascularization and MACE rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

IRT-gamma therapy for diffuse ISR lesions with a 21-Gy dose is clinically safe and feasible with marked reduction in late loss but does not confer additional benefit with regard to repeat revascularization and MACE when compared to a dose of 18 Gy.

32P Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Complex Cypher In-Stent Restenosis

Treatment of in-stent restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent is a critical issue. We provide the first report of the use of intravascular radiation therapy for this purpose in a 73-year-old diabetic patient stented for small-vessel bifurcation; treatment of Cypher diffuse in-stent restenosis with (32)P brachytherapy proved successful at clinical and angiographic follow-up at 7 months. This finding should encourage systematic studies on the safety and efficacy of IRT in this problematic setting.

Brachytherapy for restenosis after stenting for coronary artery disease: its role in the drug-eluting stent era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have brought remarkable changes to the field of interventional cardiology. The need for repeat intervention due to restenosis, the most vexing long-term failure of percutaneous coronary intervention, has been significantly reduced owing to the introduction of two major advances, the vascular brachytherapy (VBT) and the drug-eluting stents (DES).

RECENT FINDINGS

Vascular brachytherapy has demonstrated its efficacy in limiting recurrence of existing in-stent restenosis. The past 2 years have sealed its reputation, with a variety of studies demonstrating its superiority over conventional therapy in challenging patient subsets with high risk for restenosis recurrence. Moreover, the long-term follow-up confirmed durability of this therapy, and the failures of VBT were characterized as easy to treat. Conversely, DES have shown spectacular efficacy at primarily preventing the first restenosis episode following the initial stent placement. Consequently, the role of VBT may be minimized, as the overall need for repeat revascularization is diminished as a result of the wide acceptance of DES. Furthermore, if the capacity of DES to treat in-stent restenosis is confirmed in randomized trials, they may eventually supersede VBT as the therapy of choice for in-stent restenosis.

SUMMARY

At present, VBT is the proven and durable therapeutic choice for patients with complex, diffuse in-stent restenosis who would otherwise have a very poor prognosis for long-term event-free survival. DES have emerged as remarkably effective in minimizing the first restenosis occurrence; they also represent a promising and competitive alternative to VBT for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Two-year clinical follow-up of 90Sr/90 Y beta-radiation versus placebo control for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

It is an ongoing concern that intracoronary brachytherapy may possibly just delay the problem of in-stent restenosis ("late catch up"). For gamma-radiation, 3 placebo-controlled studies have shown the maintenance of the initially positive effect after 2 years, but similar data do not exist for beta-radiation. STents And Restenosis Trial (START) was the first placebo-controlled randomized trial for in-stent restenosis with beta-radiation; herein, we report the 2-year clinical follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to active treatment, 232 patients to placebo (nonactive source train) treatment. The primary end point of efficacy was target vessel revascularization (TVR); primary safety end point was any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 8 months and 2 years. Two-year clinical outcome in patients receiving brachytherapy was based on 195 of 244 original patients (79.9%) and in the placebo arm on 183 of 232 original patients (78.9%). TVR was significantly reduced by 25%; from 36.6% (placebo) to 27.5% (brachytherapy) remained significant after 2 years (RR .7 [.57-.98], 95% CI -9.2 [-17.5-0.8]). The Kaplan-Meier analysis for TVR and MACE showed improvement beginning approximately 90 days after radiation and remained almost constant for the 2 following years. Freedom from TVR was significantly increased from 62.4% +/- 3.8% to 71.6% +/- 3.3% (P = .027) and freedom from MACE from 58.9% +/- 3.7% to 68.0% +/- 3.4% (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The START trial shows for the first time that the initial beneficial effects of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation using 90 Sr/ 90 Y are maintained at 2-year clinical follow-up period.