Clinical outcomes of bivalirudin for ischemic heart disease

Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparins in Reduction of Cardiac Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Recent data suggest that bivalirudin, a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor, may be noninferior to heparins (unfractionated heparin/low molecular weight heparin) in providing protection against cardiovascular events, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Whether this advantage is consistent has not been fully defined. We evaluated cardiac outcomes with bivalirudin vs the heparins in management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Formal computer-aided searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry) were performed by scrutiny of the reference lists of trials and review articles, abstracts, meeting proceedings, and the manufacturers of direct thrombin inhibitors. Five randomized controlled trials (BAT, 1995; CACHET, 2002; REPLACE-2, 2003; REPLACE-1, 2004; and ACUITY, 2006) comparing bivalirudin to the heparins in patients with ACS, including patients undergoing PCI, were identified. The meta-analysis consisted of 25 457 patients (bivalirudin, 15 077; heparins, 10 380). The primary safety end point was major bleeding, defined as intracranial, intraocular, or retroperitoneal hemorrhage; clinically overt blood loss leading to a hemoglobin drop exceeding 3 g/dL (or 10% of hematocrit) and transfusion of 2 or more units of whole blood or packed red blood cells. The combined relative risks (RR) across all of the studies and the 95% confidence intervals of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization (bivalirudin vs heparins) were computed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model, whereas the random-effect model was used for major bleeding. A 2-sided α error < .05 was considered to be significant. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Compared to the heparins, the risk of death, MI, revascularization, and composite ischemic end points were similar with bivalirudin monotherapy. However, the risk of major bleeding was significantly lower with bivalirudin use (RR = 0.553; 95% CI = 0.402-0.761; P = .001). The present meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin may be noninferior to the heparins in reducing the composite of ischemic end points. Additionally, compared to the heparins, bivalirudin monotherapy may lower the rate of major bleeding.

Anticoagulant drugs: an update

Thromboembolic disorders continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality, resulting in an increased need for anticoagulant therapy. In recent years, new anticoagulant drugs have been developed at a rapid pace, prompted by the recognition of many undesirable properties of currently used agents, and by a greater knowledge of the active enzymatic sites of clotting factors. Furthermore, the structure of a thrombus is better understood, so that newer drugs can inhibit thrombin or Factor Xa not only on the surface of a thrombus, as in the case of heparin, but also the fibrin-bound thrombin or Factor Xa within the thrombus. These agents are usually small molecules synthesized on the basis of their inhibition of specific active sites in the respective coagulation factors. They possess many improved characteristics, such as greater efficacy and safety, oral administration, reliable pharmacokinetics, less need for laboratory monitoring and minimal interactions with other drugs and diet. Prominent among these are lepuridin (Refludan, Pfizer), fondaparinux (Arixtra, Sanofi-Synthelabo) and ximelagatran (Exanta, Astra Zeneca). However, these new drugs are still far from fulfilling the desired objectives. Most of them possess some but not all of the needed properties. Furthermore, many do not have specific antidotes for immediate reversal of their pharmacologic actions, and all are much more costly than conventional agents. Development of newer agents with properties closer to that of the ideal drug remains a challenge.

Monitoring and Reversal of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelets

Since percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was first described and the breakthrough studies of the role of stents were reported, the evolution in anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced periprocedural ischemic events and stent thrombosis. Although greater combinations and doses of anticoagulation with antiplatelets seem to provide the best protection against thrombogenic and embolic events, there is a significant trade-off with a higher risk of major and minor bleeding episodes. This review article expands on each of the commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulants used at time of PCI, focusing on drug monitoring and reversal.

Antithrombotic drugs in coronary artery disease: risk benefit ratio and bleeding

The antithrombotic treatment of coronary artery disease is becoming increasingly complex. Aspirin is often combined with more potent antiplatelet agents such as thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The classic anticoagulant unfractionated heparin is giving way to low-molecular-weight heparin, the pentasaccharide fondaparinux and the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin. Warfarin (or another vitamin K antagonist) and antiplatelet agents are often required in combination for several months. Patients and physicians who have experienced major bleeding complications sometimes question the benefit of these treatment strategies. It is therefore crucial to try and weigh the impact on efficacy against safety. In this review the net benefit is discussed both numerically, comparing absolute reductions vs. increases in risks, and also by addressing the qualitative importance of each component in reaching the net benefit. Except for primary prophylaxis in patients at low-moderate risk for coronary events, there is a net benefit of antithrombotic therapy. With increasing severity of the coronary condition the net benefit generally prevails even with an increasing number of antithrombotic drugs combined. However, as the patient slowly stabilizes after appropriate interventions, it is necessary to de-escalate the treatment in accordance with decreasing net benefit of prolonged combination therapy.

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Whether bivalirudin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with stable or unstable angina who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after pretreatment with clopidogrel is unknown.

METHODS

We enrolled 4570 patients with stable or unstable angina (with normal levels of troponin T and creatine kinase MB) who were undergoing PCI after pretreatment with a 600-mg dose of clopidogrel at least 2 hours before the procedure; 2289 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive bivalirudin, and 2281 to receive unfractionated heparin. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization due to myocardial ischemia within 30 days after randomization, or major bleeding during the index hospitalization (with a net clinical benefit defined as a reduction in the incidence of the end point). The secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point was 8.3% (190 patients) in the bivalirudin group as compared with 8.7% (199 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.15; P=0.57). The secondary end point occurred in 134 patients (5.9%) in the bivalirudin group and 115 patients (5.0%) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.49; P=0.23). The incidence of major bleeding was 3.1% (70 patients) in the bivalirudin group and 4.6% (104 patients) in the unfractionated-heparin group (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable and unstable angina who underwent PCI after pretreatment with clopidogrel, bivalirudin did not provide a net clinical benefit (i.e., it did not reduce the incidence of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target-vessel revascularization, or major bleeding) as compared with unfractionated heparin, but it did significantly reduce the incidence of major bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262054.)

New anticoagulant strategies in ST elevation myocardial infarction: trials and clinical implications

New data have re-established the importance of anticoagulation of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), both as an adjuvant to reperfusion therapy or in patients ineligible for reperfusion. Recent randomized trials have found newer agents to be superior to conventional unfractionated heparin. This article summarizes current understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of STEMI and provides a comprehensive review of emerging trial data for low molecular weight heparins, anti-factor Xa agents and direct thrombin inhibitors in this setting.

Direct thrombin inhibitors: alternatives to heparin

After more than 70 years of effective clinical use, heparin remains the most common anticoagulant in use and one of the most commonly prescribed drugs to hospitalized patients. However, the biologic variability and immunogenicity limit its utility. With increasing volumes of vascular intervention and an aging population, an increase in the need for anticoagulation can be anticipated. This article reviews current viable options and barriers to the use of heparin.

Enoxaparin injection for the treatment of high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) refers to a cardiovascular disorder characterized by intracoronary thrombus formation on a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque with partial or transient occlusion. Generation of thrombin resulting from exposure of collagen leads to activation of platelets and conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin, thus forming a platelet-rich thrombus. The main therapeutic objective is to protect the patient from thrombotic complications, independent of the choice of antithrombotic agents. The management of NSTE myocardial infarction (MI) is constantly evolving. For primarily conservative strategy, enoxaparin has been proven superior to unfractioned heparin (UFH). With early invasive strategy providing better clinical outcome compared with conservative strategy, the effectiveness of enoxaparin in reducing death and MI rates is now being reconsidered in the era of poly-pharmacotherapy, early percutaneous coronary interventions and drug eluting stents. Bleeding complications can be minimized by avoiding cross-over from UFH to enoxaparin or vice versa, or by reducing the dosage of enoxaparin. We review the studies of enoxaparin and discuss its current role in the contemporary treatment of NSTE-ACS.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Pharmacological antithrombotic adjuncts to percutaneous coronary intervention

Stent thrombosis is the major cause of early adverse events during percutaneous coronary intervention. Its incidence has fallen considerably in recent years, principally due to the introduction of effective antithrombotic therapies. The selection of an appropriate antithrombotic regimen is critical in achieving a balance between reducing ischaemic events and minimising bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In this article, evidence for the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies is discussed, including the thienopyridines, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, direct thrombin inhibitors and pentasaccharides.

The status of new anticoagulants

Currently available anticoagulants include heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux and warfarin. Despite advances with low-molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux, the currently available agents have limitations that have provided the impetus for the development of new drugs for prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. Novel anticoagulants targeting specific steps in coagulation are in various stages of development. This paper reviews the pharmacology of these new agents and describes the results of clinical trials with new anticoagulants in more advanced stages of clinical testing.

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor for heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia: present and future perspectives

Heparin remains the most commonly used anticoagulant in the treatment of patients with acute vascular syndromes, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina and ischaemic stroke. However, heparin therapy is not always associated with a significant improvement of clinical outcomes, is linked with enhanced bleeding risk and can occasionally provoke the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia, the most devastating complication of conventional therapy with unfractioned heparin. Understanding the key role of thrombin in clot formation and platelet activation has stimulated the development of a new class of drugs - direct thrombin inhibitors. The direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban has been known for decades. Similar to the unfractioned heparin, argatroban requires intravenous administration and activated partial prothrombin time-dependent dose adjustment; however, this pharmacological agent has a relatively short half-life that broadens its safety margins, as well as its low antigenic potential due to the small molecular weight of the compound. The efficacy of argatroban has been demonstrated among patients with acute coronary syndromes and stroke. However, this drug is currently approved by the FDA only for the treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia. Indeed, in such patients, argatroban significantly improves clinical outcomes, and is associated with reduced mortality. Further clinical studies are needed to present more clinical evidence necessary to broad the indication spectrum of this agent.

Bivalirudin as an Anticoagulation Agent: Safety and Efficacy in Peripheral Interventions

PURPOSE

Traditionally, unfractionated heparin is used to prevent thrombotic complications in peripheral interventions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of bivalirudin as the anticoagulant agent for peripheral interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 108 patients who underwent 110 peripheral interventions between January 2002 and January 2004 and received bivalirudin as the sole anticoagulation agent was conducted at Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute. Interventions were performed in the following areas: iliac, femoropopliteal, and distal (n = 55), carotid (n = 31), vertebral (n = 1), renal (n = 14), aorta (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 2). The following procedural and clinical endpoints were examined: death, requirement of urgent surgery or surgery during the same admission, urgent percutaneous revascularization in the same treated vessel, thrombotic or embolic events, bleeding events, and groin complications.

RESULTS

A total of 266 lesions were dilated in 185 arteries. There were no procedural mortalities, procedural success was 99.1%, and the complication rate was 3.6%. There was one embolic stroke (0.9%), one thrombosis (0.9%), and two groin hematomas (1.8%). No patient required urgent surgery or reintervention in the same treated vessel. No complications were noted at 7 days after the procedure. There were two interventions by postprocedure day 30: toe amputation and groin debridement.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin is a safe alternative to unfractionated heparin as the anticoagulation agent in peripheral interventions. This study shows that the complication profile is comparable to other bivalirudin studies. Bivalirudin is effective, easy to use, and is associated with few bleeding complications.

Drug Insight: bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention-risks, measures and impact of anticoagulant treatment options

In Europe, the use of interventional cardiology, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is increasing rapidly. The use of anticoagulation agents in PCI procedures is essential, but despite technical improvements, a significant associated bleeding risk still exists: more than 5% of patients are estimated to require transfusion, and around a further 13% experience minor bleeding. The methods used to detect and measure blood loss following PCI, however, vary widely between institutions and clinical trials. The risk of bleeding is influenced by therapeutic options and patient-specific characteristics, such as age, anemia and previous exposure to anticoagulants. Bleeding is associated with death, and also with less severe conditions such as thrombocytopenia, anemia, and hematoma, which have major impacts on patients' welfare and length of hospital stay, and on hospital budgets. Unfractionated heparin is the most widely used anticoagulant during PCI. Heparin, antiplatelet agents and other anticoagulants, however, have limitations that make it difficult to achieve a level of anticoagulation that prevents ischemic events without promoting bleeding. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin and the addition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors offer improved outcomes, but safer and more effective therapeutic agents are still required. New anticoagulants, including direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin, show similar levels of efficacy to heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but with fewer hemorrhagic complications, and might advance clinical practice. This review evaluates the impact of PCI-related bleeding on patients' outcomes and hospital resources, examines methods for the detection and measurement of bleeding, and appraises the therapeutic options--particularly the newer agents--available to minimize hemorrhagic complications.

New anticoagulants

The limitations of heparin and warfarin have prompted the development of new anticoagulant drugs for prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Novel parenteral agents include synthetic analogs of the pentasaccharide sequence of heparin that mediates its interaction with antithrombin. Fondaparinux, the first synthetic pentasaccharide, is licensed for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopedic surgery and for initial treatment of patients with VTE. Idraparinux, a long-acting pentasaccharide that is administered subcutaneously once-weekly, is being compared with warfarin for treatment of VTE and for prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. New oral anticoagulants include direct inhibitors of thrombin, factor Xa and factor IXa. Designed to provide more streamlined anticoagulation than warfarin, these agents can be given without routine coagulation monitoring. Ximelagatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is as effective and safe as warfarin for prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, ximelagatran produces a three-fold elevation in alanine transaminase levels in 7.9% of patients treated for more than a month, the long-term significance of which is uncertain. Whether other direct thrombin inhibitors or inhibitors of factors Xa or IXa also have this problem is under investigation. After a brief review of coagulation pathways, this paper focuses on new anticoagulants in advanced stages of clinical testing.

Management of the anticoagulated patient

Excessive bleeding or thrombosis is a preeminent concern for all surgeons. Patients may be at risk because of medical therapy, underlying disease, or complications related to both. An understanding of the coagulation cascade--mechanisms and tests of function--permits a rational, if not always complete, basis for a plan of therapy. Newer anticoagulation medications are changing how thrombotic complications, such a VTE or graft occlusion, are treated or prevented. This entire area is undergoing rapid evolution, and the approaches that have been standard for decades soon will be supplanted. Ultimately, however, the most important assessment is made at the bedside by the clinician.

Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution

Interventional radiology techniques made possible by the antithrombotic properties of heparin have revolutionized treatment for a myriad of disorders. Newer low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) offer several advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially in chronic settings. They are increasing in popularity for use during vascular procedures. However, LMWH shares limitations with UFH such as heterogeneity, nonspecificity, and induction of thrombocytopenia. These drawbacks have led to a search for the next generation of antithrombotic agents. Homogeneous drugs targeting specific coagulation cascade molecules are now available. The number of alternative anticoagulant drug combinations presents clinicians with a confusing array of choices. The strengths and weaknesses of UFH, LMWH, and direct antithrombin agents are presented. The promising future of LMWH and hirudins is discussed.

New anticoagulants: beyond heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin

The limitations of traditional anticoagulants, heparin and warfarin, have prompted the development of new anticoagulant drugs for prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. After a brief review of thrombogenesis and its regulation, this paper focuses on new anticoagulant agents in more advanced stages of clinical testing.

Novel uses for current and future direct thrombin inhibitors: focus on ximelagatran and bivalirudin

Ximelagatran and bivalirudin are direct thrombin inhibitors that have been studied for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis and have potential advantages over the traditional indirect thrombin inhibitors (i.e., warfarin, unfractionated heparin and low molecular-weight heparin). They are both reversible inhibitors of thrombin and block both circulating and fibrin-bound thrombin. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin possess favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles including wider therapeutic indices, faster onsets of action and less interpatient variability compared to indirect thrombin inhibitors. Ximelagatran has shown favourable clinical trial results in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and atrial fibrillation. Similarly, bivalirudin has shown positive results in patients with acute coronary syndromes, however, further investigation is needed. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin have shown promising results in the management of thrombosis and the results of future studies confirming their use for the aforementioned indications are anticipated.

Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial: study design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS; unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) are at significant risk for death and myocardial infarction. Early angiography followed by revascularization is considered the treatment of choice for moderate- to high-risk patients with ACS. However, despite the integration of newer therapies including stents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines, the rate of adverse ischemic events still remains unacceptably high, and the intensive pharmacologic regimens used to stabilize the disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and support angioplasty and surgical revascularization procedures elicit a high rate of bleeding complications. Pilot trials suggest that the thrombin-specific anticoagulant bivalirudin may improve clinical outcomes in ACS.

STUDY DESIGN

In the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY (ACUITY) trial, 13,800 patients with moderate- to high-risk ACS are being prospectively randomly assigned at up to 600 centers to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + IIb/IIIa inhibition, versus bivalirudin + provisional IIb/IIIa inhibition. All patients undergo cardiac catheterization within 72 hours, followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization when appropriate. In a second random assignment, patients assigned to receive IIb/IIIa inhibitors are subrandomized to upstream drug initiation, versus IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during angioplasty only. The primary study end point is the composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization for ischemia, and major bleeding at 30 days. Clinical follow-up will continue for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACUITY trial is the largest study yet performed in patients with ACS undergoing an invasive strategy. In addition to evaluating the utility of bivalirudin in ACS, this study will also provide important guidance regarding the necessity for and timing of IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration.

Antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we recommend immediate and then daily oral aspirin (Grade 1A). For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend immediate treatment with clopidogrel, 300-mg bolus po, followed by 75 mg/d indefinitely (Grade 1A). In all NSTE ACS patients in whom diagnostic catheterization will be delayed or when coronary bypass surgery will not occur until > 5 days, we recommend clopidogrel as bolus therapy (300 mg), followed by 75 mg/d for 9 to 12 months in addition to aspirin (Grade 1A). In NSTE ACS patients in whom angiography will take place within 24 h, we suggest beginning clopidogrel after the coronary anatomy has been determined (Grade 2A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we recommend discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). In moderate- to high-risk patients presenting with NSTE ACS, we recommend either eptifibatide or tirofiban for initial (early) treatment in addition to treatment with aspirin and heparin (Grade 1A). For the acute treatment of NSTE ACS, we recommend low molecular weight heparins over unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1B] and UFH over no heparin therapy use with antiplatelet therapies (Grade 1A). We recommend against the direct thrombin inhibitors as routine initial antithrombin therapy (Grade 1B). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and with stable CAD, we recommend aspirin in doses from 75 to 325 mg as initial therapy and in doses of 75 to 162 mg as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend long-term clopidogrel (Grade 1A). For primary prevention in patients with at least moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [Grade 2A]; for patients at particularly high risk of events in whom the international normalized ratio (INR) can be monitored without difficulty, we suggest low-dose VKA (target INR, 1.5) [Grade 2A].

Bivalirudin versus heparin and protamine in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Bivalirudin is a short-acting direct thrombin inhibitor, with advantages over unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation in cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that bivalirudin is not associated with a clinically important increase in blood loss compared with heparin with protamine reversal in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. We also assessed flow with angiography at 3 months using a modified Thombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade in the grafted coronary arteries.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus, 1.75 mg/kg/h infusion) or heparin (150 to 300 U/kg bolus) with protamine reversal.

RESULTS

A median of 3 (range, 1 to 5) grafts were inserted per patient. Blood loss for the 12 hours after study drug initiation in the bivalirudin group (median, 793 mL; interquartile range, 532 to 1,214 mL; range, 320 to 4,909 mL; n = 50) was not significantly greater than in the heparin group (median, 805 mL; interquartile range, 517 to 1,117 mL; range, 201 to 2,567 mL; n = 50; p = 0.165). Median graft flow was 3.0 in the bivalirudin group (n = 40) and 2.67 in the heparin group (n = 39; p = 0.047). The bivalirudin group had more patients with grade 3 (ie, full) flow in at least 1 graft (100% versus 90%; p = 0.04), a trend toward more patients with grade 3 flow in all grafts (60% versus 38%; p = 0.06), and more grafts with grade 3 flow (82% versus 67%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation for OPCAB surgery with bivalirudin was feasible without a clinically important increase in perioperative blood loss. Graft flow was better in the bivalirudin patients; the impact of this on clinical outcomes requires a larger study.

Pharmacologic Agents in Stroke Prevention, Acute Stroke Therapy, and Interventional Procedures

Pharmaceutical agents have moved far beyond just the aspirin and heparin that were the mainstays of stroke and interventional therapy as recently as 10 to 15 years ago. Our understanding of the mechanisms of thrombus formation and vascular response to damage as well as our armamentarium has tremendously improved in the past decade. Direct thrombin inhibitors, powerful antiplatelet agents, new fibrinolytic agents, and statins now allow far greater manipulation of the intraprocedural and postprocedural clot cascade and atherogenesis. It is mandatory that current-day interventionists understand the correct and appropriate use of these agents to achieve the desired outcomes of therapy.

Adjunctive use of direct thrombin inhibitors in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

The direct thrombin inhibitors hirudin and bivalirudin inhibit both fluid-phase and clot-bound thrombin. These agents have been extensively studied in clinical trials in comparison with intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), as adjuncts to fibrinolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and they are currently undergoing further evaluation in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). In angiographic trials there were trends for patients treated with hirudin to be more likely to achieve Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow at 90 minutes than patients treated with UFH (65% versus 57% in TIMI-5; 41% versus 33% in Hirudin for the Improvement of Thrombolysis [HIT]-4; statistically nonsignificant differences in both trials). In Montréal Heart Institute trials and the multicenter Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-1 trial the use of bivalirudin was associated with an increased incidence of TIMI grade 3 flow (85% versus 31%, p = 0.006; and 48% versus 35%, p = 0.02, respectively). These studies used streptokinase as the fibrinolytic agent except in TIMI-5 where alteplase was used. The initial clinical outcomes studies (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes [GUSTO]-IIA and TIMI-9A) were discontinued early because of a high incidence of intracerebral bleeding (approximately 1.8%). Patients in these studies had either STEMI or NSTEACS, and thus not all were treated with fibrinolytic therapy. These studies were recommenced as GUSTO-IIB and TIMI-9B, using lower dosages of hirudin (0.1 mg/kg bolus + 0.1 mg/kg infusion for 96 hours). Neither TIMI-9B nor GUSTO-IIB showed an improvement in efficacy (death or reinfarction) or an increase in bleeding with hirudin. However, in the 1015 patients with STEMI treated with streptokinase in GUSTO-IIB, there was a 40% reduction in the combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (8.6% versus 14.4%, odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.87, p = 0.004). In the HERO-2 trial, 17073 patients receiving streptokinase for STEMI were randomized to receive either bivalirudin (0.25 mg/kg bolus and 0.5 mg/kg infusion for 12 hours followed by 0.25 mg/kg) or UFH (5000 IU bolus and 800-1000 IU/h infusion titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT] of 50-75 seconds) for a total of 48 hours. Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups (10.8% with bivalirudin versus 10.9% with UFH, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.09, p = 0.85). There was a 30% reduction in the incidence of reinfarction before 96 hours (1.6% with bivalirudin versus 2.3% with UFH, OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87, p = 0.001). Patients treated with bivalirudin had significantly more moderate bleeding (1.4% versus 1.1% with UFH, OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.0-1.74, p = 0.05). In a meta-analysis of patients with STEMI in the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Trialists' collaboration, direct thrombin inhibitors were found to reduce the rate of reinfarction at 30 days (3.9% versus 4.8% with UFH, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.90, p < 0.001), but did not reduce mortality (9.1% versus 9.0%, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.11, p = 0.68) or the combined incidence of death/reinfarction at 30 days (11.8% versus 12.4%, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.02, p = 0.18). There was no increase in major bleeding or intracerebral bleeding with direct thrombin inhibitor therapy. In conclusion, direct thrombin inhibitors reduce reinfarction, but not mortality, in patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolytic therapy. The major benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors appears to be in patients undergoing PCI, particularly after STEMI.

Bivalirudin for Endovascular Intervention in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Case Report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Intra-arterial thrombolysis has been demonstrated to improve recanalization and outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, thrombolytic agents have limited effectiveness and are associated with a significant risk of bleeding. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that has been demonstrated in the cardiology literature to have a more favorable efficacy and bleeding profile than other antithrombotic medications. We report the use of bivalirudin during endovascular treatment of acute stroke, when hemorrhagic complications are not uncommon.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation presented with right hemiparesis and aphasia and was found to have a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10. Computed tomographic scans revealed no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, or ischemic stroke. Cerebral angiography revealed thromboembolic occlusion of the superior division of the left middle cerebral artery.

INTERVENTION

For anticoagulation, a loading dose of bivalirudin was intravenously administered before the interventional procedure, followed by continuous infusion. Attempts to remove the clot with an endovascular snare failed to induce recanalization of the vessel. Bivalirudin was then administered intra-arterially. Immediate postprocedural angiography demonstrated restoration of flow in the left middle cerebral artery. Repeat computed tomographic scans demonstrated no intracranial hemorrhage. The patient's hemiparesis and aphasia were nearly resolved and her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2 at the time of her discharge 5 days later.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of bivalirudin for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Bivalirudin may be a useful agent for intravenous anticoagulation and intra-arterial thrombolysis in this setting.

Bivalirudin provides increasing benefit with decreasing renal function: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of ischemic and bleeding events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin reduces these combined events. We sought to assess whether this benefit was influenced by renal function. A meta-analysis of 3 randomized trials (n = 5,035) comparing bivalirudin with heparin during PCI, stratified by estimated creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault equation (>90 [n = 1,578], 90 to 60 [n = 2,163], 59 to 30 [n = 1,255], and <30 ml/min [n = 39]), was conducted. The composite end points of death, myocardial infarction or revascularization, hemorrhage, and combined ischemic or bleeding events were assessed. A common odds ratio for each creatinine clearance strata was estimated with a random-effects model. The interaction between renal impairment and benefit from bivalirudin was assessed. Adverse ischemic and bleeding events increased with decreasing renal function. The relative benefit of bivalirudin with respect to ischemic and bleeding events was maintained within each stratum. The absolute benefit in terms of ischemic and bleeding complications increased with decreasing creatinine clearance (normal 2.2%, mild 5.8%, moderate 7.7%, severe 14.4%; p trend <0.001, interaction p = 0.044). Renal dysfunction remains a prevalent risk factor for ischemic and bleeding events in patients who undergo PCI. Bivalirudin provides greater absolute benefit in patients with impaired renal function.

Current anticoagulant therapy--unmet clinical needs

Heparin and the vitamin K antagonist warfarin have been in clinical use for more than 50 years. However, both are associated with several well-documented drawbacks that limit their use. Warfarin can be administered orally, making it the agent of choice for long-term management of thromboembolic conditions, but frequent coagulation monitoring is necessary because of its unpredictable anticoagulant effect--the result, in part, of food and drug interactions-and its narrow therapeutic window. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be administered parenterally only. Coagulation monitoring is also required with heparin although not with LMWH, due to reduced levels of plasma protein binding. In the last 10 years, in the quest to develop new agents that are at least as effective as those currently available, with improved safety and greater ease of use, anticoagulants that target almost every step in the coagulation pathway have been developed. These include inhibitors of the factor VIIa (FVIIa)/tissue factor complex, FIXa inhibitors, direct and antithrombin-dependent FXa inhibitors, agents that enhance the protein C anticoagulant pathway, and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that inhibit the activity of thrombin. Of the new agents, three DTIs-hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban-and the synthetic pentasaccharide (Arixtra) are approved for clinical use. Three other new agents-activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and the oral DTI ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca)-have been evaluated in Phase III studies. The mechanism of action and properties of these new anticoagulants and their potential to replace those in current use will be reviewed here.

A novel approach to thrombin inhibition

The inability of the heparin-antithrombin complex to inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin limits the utility of heparin for treatment of arterial thrombosis. In contrast with heparin, melagatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), is equally effective at inhibiting fluid-phase thrombin and thrombin bound to fibrin. This reflects the ability of melagatran, a reversible, active site-directed DTI, to access the active site of thrombin even when it is fibrin-bound. Because bivalent DTIs, such as hirudin, compete with fibrin for access to the fibrin-binding site on thrombin, bivalent DTIs produce less inhibition of fibrin-bound thrombin than free thrombin when given in low doses. Consequently, higher doses of hirudin are needed for complete inhibition of fibrin-bound thrombin resulting in a steep dose-response curve. This phenomenon, combined with the fact that hirudin irreversibly inhibits thrombin, may account for hirudin's narrow therapeutic window. In a rabbit arterial thrombosis prevention and ear bleeding model, melagatran produced less bleeding than hirudin when the two agents were given at doses that produced nearly complete inhibition of thrombosis. The more favourable benefit-to-risk profile of melagatran in this model likely reflects better access to fibrin-bound thrombin and the reversible nature of the melagatran/thrombin complex. The theoretical advantages of melagatran may endow it with mechanistic advantages over heparin, and safety advantages over hirudin. Large-scale clinical trials are under way to evaluate the utility of an orally active prodrug form of melagatran for prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis.

The evolving role of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes

The central role of thrombin in the initiation and propagation of intravascular thrombus provides a strong rationale for direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Direct thrombin inhibitors are theoretically likely to be more effective than indirect thrombin inhibitors, such as unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, because the heparins block only circulating thrombin, whereas direct thrombin inhibitors block both circulating and clot-bound thrombin. Several initial phase 3 trials did not demonstrate a convincing benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors over unfractionated heparin. However, the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis confirms the superiority of direct thrombin inhibitors, particularly hirudin and bivalirudin, over unfractionated heparin for the prevention of death or myocardial infarction (MI) during treatment in patients with ACS, primarily due to a reduction in MI (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.91) with little impact on death. The absolute risk reduction in the composite of death or MI at the end of treatment (0.8%) was similar at 30 days (0.7%), indicating no loss of benefit after cessation of therapy. Supportive evidence for the superiority of direct thrombin inhibitors over heparin derives from the recently reported Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 randomized trial with ST-segment elevation ACS, which demonstrated a similar benefit of bivalirudin over heparin for the prevention of death or MI at 30 days (absolute risk reduction 1.0%), again primarily due to a reduction in MI during treatment (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.87), with little impact on death. Further evaluation of hirudin and bivalirudin in the antithrombotic management of patients with ACS is warranted.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes has changed dramatically over the last several years. Most patients now undergo some form of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which includes either stent placement or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Along with new medical interventions for acute coronary syndromes comes the need for new antithrombotic therapies. Combination therapy with antiplatelet agents (aspirin, adenosine diphosphate inhibitors), glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors, and anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins) is administered, depending on the type of intervention and severity of the coronary lesion. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that recently was approved as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing PTCA. Compared with unfractionated heparin, bivalirudin reduces the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization, with a concurrent reduction in bleeding. This agent offers promise as a replacement for unfractionated heparin in PCI and is being studied in comparison with unfractionated heparin plus GP IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors in patients undergoing intracoronary stent placement.

Anticoagulation therapy

Despite refinements and standardization in the use of anticoagulants, many problems remain for clinicians. Dr. Crowther describes appropriate starting and maintenance doses of warfarin, factors accounting for inter- and intra-observer variability and importantly, the management of the over-anticoagulated patients and bleeding patients. Dr. White compares unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and addresses whether there truly are differences in the efficacy and safety of different LMWH's for both arterial and venous indications. Dr. Ortel discusses the management of the problem patient who requires anticoagulants, the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the pregnant patient, the obese patient, patients who have renal insufficiency and/or liver disease, patients with malignant disease, and other challenging patient populations.

Bivalirudin: a review of its potential place in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Bivalirudin, a synthetic analogue of hirudin, is a specific and reversible inhibitor of thrombin which binds directly with both fluid-phase and clot-bound thrombin. In patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), results from a large well designed study and its reanalysis (n = 4312) indicate that bivalirudin is more effective than heparin in the prevention of ischaemic complications for up to 90 days after the start of treatment. In addition, among patients undergoing PTCA for post myocardial infarction (MI) bivalirudin may be more effective than heparin in preventing ischaemic complications for up to 180 days after treatment was started. Data from dose-finding studies indicate bivalirudin has potential in the treatment of patients with unstable angina not undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, well designed comparative studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made. Among patients with acute ST elevation MI, randomised trials have demonstrated bivalirudin to be significantly more effective than heparin in improving early patency in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase. Data from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion/Occlusion (HERO)-1 trial (n = 412) indicate that bivalirudin recipients were significantly more likely to have Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischaemia (TIMI) grade 3 flow at 90 to 120 minutes than heparin recipients. In addition, data from the HERO-2 trial (n = 17 073) show bivalirudin was significantly more effective than heparin in reducing adjudicated 96-hour reinfarction and 30-day investigator-reported death/reinfarction than heparin. Bivalirudin was as effective as heparin in reducing 30-day mortality. Data from a meta-analysis of four randomised trials among patients undergoing PTCA or treatment for acute coronary syndromes indicate that, at after 30 to 50 days of follow-up, bivalirudin was significantly more effective than heparin in reducing the incidence of nonfatal MI and the combined endpoint of death or nonfatal MI. The most significant adverse events associated with bivalirudin are bleeding complications. In individual trials, bivalirudin was as well tolerated as heparin with, in general, a reduced incidence of bleeding complications. Additionally, bivalirudin provides a more consistent, predictable anticoagulant response. In 4312 patients with unstable angina undergoing PTCA the incidence of retroperitoneal bleeding, blood transfusion and major haemorrhage was significantly lower in bivalirudin than heparin recipients. Data from the HERO-2 trial in patients with acute MI indicate that although bivalirudin recipients had a significantly higher incidence of mild or moderate bleeding than heparin recipients, there was no difference in intracranial haemorrhage, severe bleeding or transfusions. Data from a meta-analysis among 5674 patients with ischaemic heart disease show bivalirudin recipients were at a significantly lower risk of haemorrhagic events than heparin recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bivalirudin is an effective alternative to heparin in the prevention of ischaemic complications in patients with unstable angina undergoing PTCA. In addition, the drug has shown potential in the treatment of patients with unstable angina not undergoing PCI. For patients with MI, it is clear that bivalirudin can replace heparin in the management of MI where streptokinase is used as the thrombolytic agent. Further data are required on the efficacy of bivalirudin in patients undergoing thrombolysis with newer thrombolytics.

Bivalirudin: an anticoagulant for acute coronary syndromes and coronary interventions

Heparin is a commonly used anticoagulant in patients with coronary artery disease but its use does not always result in low rates of ischaemic and bleeding events, so the search for new anticoagulants continues. Thrombin plays a key role in both thrombosis and haemostasis and direct thrombin inhibitors modelled on the hirudin molecule found in the saliva of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis, have recently been developed. To date, the only direct thrombin inhibitor shown to reduce both the ischaemic and the bleeding complications associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is bivalirudin, which is approved for this indication in the US and New Zealand. This agent is currently being studied in patients undergoing PCI with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and stenting. Bivalirudin has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of reinfarction in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with streptokinase, but its use for this indication is not approved in the US. It may also prove to be beneficial in patients with acute MI treated with other fibrinolytic regimens or with primary or facilitated PCI. Bivalirudin is suitable for use as an alternative to heparin in the majority of patients undergoing PCI and in patients receiving streptokinase for acute MI.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Thrombin plays a central role in thrombosis. Consequently, most current antithrombotic treatment strategies are aimed at blocking the activity of thrombin, or preventing its generation. Although heparin has been a cornerstone of treatment, it has limitations. Thus, the anticoagulant response to heparin is unpredictable, the heparin/antithrombin complex is unable to inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin, an important trigger of thrombus growth, and heparin is neutralized by platelet factor 4. Direct thrombin inhibitors were developed to overcome these limitations. Unlike heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors produce a predictable anticoagulant response that is unaffected by platelet factor 4, and they inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin. Three parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors--hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban--are currently licensed for use in North America, and orally available direct thrombin inhibitors are under investigation. This review summarizes the clinical trial data with direct thrombin inhibitors and provides perspective on the role of direct thrombin inhibitors in the face of other new anticoagulants currently under development.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

To describe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT or HIT-2), an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Available treatment options and considerations in developing a therapy approach are discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the National Library of Medicine (1992-June 2001) was done to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles related to laboratory recognition and treatment options of HIT, including the use of agents in selected clinical conditions, were reviewed and included.

CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a rare but potentially severe adverse reaction to heparin that was, until recently, poorly understood and had limited treatment options. Recent advances describing the recognition and clinical manifestations of immune-mediated HIT, including recently available antithrombotic treatment options, have dramatically changed outcomes for patients having this syndrome.

Bivalirudin as a replacement for unfractionated heparin in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: observations from the TIMI 8 trial. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 8 trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in a double-blind phase III trial of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

All patients received aspirin and were randomized either to unfractionated heparin (bolus of 70 U/kg followed by an infusion of 15 U/kg/h) or bivalirudin (bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.25 mg/kg/h) for a minimum of 72 hours. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of all cause mortality or nonfatal recurrent MI.

RESULTS

A total of 133 of the planned 5320 patients were enrolled, at which point the study was terminated by the sponsor because of a decision at the time to suspend further development of bivalirudin. Through 14 days, the incidence of death or nonfatal MI was 9.2% in the 65 patients in the unfractionated heparin group and was 2.9% in the 68 patients in the bivalirudin group, odds ratio (95% CI) 0.30 (0.06-1.53). Major hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients in the unfractionated heparin group (4.6%) but in none of the patients in the bivalirudin group (P =.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The trend toward a lower rate of death or nonfatal MI in the bivalirudin group is consistent with a therapeutic effect of the drug and is consistent with other trials of bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The potential for clinically meaningful antithrombotic activity without an increased risk of bleeding and availablility of an alternative anticoagulation strategy in patients who cannot tolerate unfractionated heparin are particularly attractive and underscore the need for further evaluation of bivalirudin.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Studies of the anticoagulant effects of hirudin, which is derived from the saliva of the leech Hirudo medicinalis, led to the development of compounds that can directly inhibit thrombin activity without the need for additional cofactors. One of these is the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, which has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

This is a review of the pharmacologic properties, efficacy, tolerability, and potential cost-effectiveness of bivalirudin in the treatment of ischemic coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Articles were identified by searches of MEDLINE (1966-September 2001), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-September 2001), and the Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-September 2001) using the terms bivalirudin and Hirulog. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed for relevant articles.

RESULTS

Bivalirudin is a synthetic polypeptide that directly inhibits thrombin by binding simultaneously to its active catalytic site and its substrate recognition site. After intravenous administration, peak plasma concentrations occur in 2 minutes. In patients given a 1.0-mg/kg bolus followed by a 2.5-mg/kg per hour infusion, a median activated clotting time of 346 seconds is achieved with little interpatient or intrapatient variability. Clearance of bivalirudin occurs through a combination of renal elimination and proteolytic cleavage, and doses may need to be decreased in the presence of renal dysfunction. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin has been associated with equivalent efficacy but lower bleeding rates (P < 0.001) than unfractionated heparin (UFH). Data from the Hirulog Early Reperfusion/Occlusion-2 study suggest no reduction in mortality with bivalirudin compared with heparin when either is added to aspirin and streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction, despite a lower reinfarction rate (P < 0.001). Experience with bivalirudin in patients with unstable angina and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), as well as in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIla inhibitors, is limited. The differences in bleeding rates between bivalirudin and heparin in published clinical trials probably reflect differences in levels of anticoagulation achieved in comparator groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Given its high cost, bivalirudin should be reserved for use as an alternative to UFH, primarily in patients with HIT, until clinical trials have more clearly demonstrated its benefits in terms of efficacy or safety.

Bivalirudin versus heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable or postinfarction angina: Final report reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study

BACKGROUND

This study was a reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, which compared bivalirudin with high-dose heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable angina.

METHODS

Differences in rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization were compared at 7, 90, and 180 days after angioplasty with intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

The combined end point occurred in 135 of 2161 patients (6.2%) in the bivalirudin group and in 169 of 2151 patients (7.9%) in the heparin group at 7 days (P =.039). Differences persisted between the groups at 90 days (P =.012) and 180 days (P =.153). Bleeding occurred in 76 patients (3.5%) in the bivalirudin group versus 199 (9.3%) in the heparin group (P <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the hypothesis that bivalirudin reduces ischemic complications and bleeding after angioplasty. Further trials are needed to evaluate bivalirudin versus heparin in conjunction with platelet-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and for coronary stenting.

Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of fibrinolytic therapy and heparin for acute myocardial infarction fails to achieve reperfusion in 40-70% of patients, and early reocclusion occurs in a substantial number. We did a randomised, open-label trial to compare the thrombin-specific anticoagulant, bivalirudin, with heparin in patients undergoing fibrinolysis with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

17073 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned an intravenous bolus and 48-h infusion of either bivalirudin (n=8516) or heparin (n=8557), together with a standard 1.5 million unit dose of streptokinase given directly after the antithrombotic bolus. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included reinfarction within 96 h and bleeding. Strokes and reinfarctions were adjudicated by independent committees who were unaware of treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

By 30 days, 919 patients (10.8%) in the bivalirudin group and 931 (10.9%) in the heparin group had died (odds ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.90-1.09], p=0.85). The mortality rates adjusted for baseline risk factors were 10.5% for bivalirudin and 10.9% for heparin (0.96 [0.86-1.07], p=0.46). There were significantly fewer reinfarctions within 96 h in the bivalirudin group than in the heparin group (0.70 [0.56-0.87], p=0.001). Severe bleeding occurred in 58 patients (0.7%) in the bivalirudin group versus 40 patients (0.5%) in the heparin group (p=0.07), and intracerebral bleeding occurred in 47 (0.6%) versus 32 (0.4%), respectively (p=0.09). The rates of moderate and mild bleeding were significantly higher in the bivalirudin group than the heparin group (1.32 [1.00-1.74], p=0.05; and 1.47 [1.34-1.62], p<0.0001; respectively). Transfusions were given to 118 patients (1.4%) in the bivalirudin group versus 95 patients (1.1%) in the heparin group (1.25 [0.95-1.64], p=0.11).

INTERPRETATION

Bivalirudin did not reduce mortality compared with unfractionated heparin, but did reduce the rate of adjudicated reinfarction within 96 h by 30%. Small absolute increases were seen in mild and moderate bleeding in patients given bivalirudin. Bivalirudin is a new anticoagulant treatment option in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with streptokinase.

Pharmacologic preservation of the hemostatic system during cardiac surgery

Bleeding after cardiac surgery remains a major potential problem. Numerous pharmacologic approaches to attenuating hemostatic system activation in cardiac surgery patients have been studied to further improve patient management. Therapeutic approaches studied include inhibiting thrombin generation or activation, preserving platelet function, and decreasing the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Pharmacologic approaches to reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery patients are based on either preventing or reversing the defects associated with the CPB-induced coagulopathy. The increasing use of platelet inhibitors (clopidogrel and IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists) and new anticoagulants (low-molecular weight heparins, pentasaccharide, recombinant hirudin, bivalirudin, and argatroban) also pose interesting problems in managing cardiac surgery patients. Aprotinin and lysine analogues (epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid) have become mainstay therapeutic agents to prevent bleeding and the potential need for allogeneic transfusion. Newer therapies that are important to consider include the potential of recombinant activated factor VIIa as a therapy for refractory bleeding after cardiac surgery.

Bivalirudin for percutaneous coronary intervention and in acute coronary syndromes

This review focuses on the use of bivalirudin as a replacement anticoagulant for heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, or who are being treated for unstable angina pectoris, ST-elevation, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Potential advantages of bivalirudin include a lack of dependence on antithrombin III for anticoagulant activity, the ability to inactivate both fibrin-bound and soluble thrombin, a lack of aggregatory effects on platelets, a predictable anticoagulant response without monitoring, and a wider therapeutic window. Clinical trial results to date suggest that bivlirudin is at least as effective as heparin with superior safety due to lower bleeding rates.