Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and cardiac function (and dysfunction): a failure to communicate?

Genetic influences of beta-adrenoceptor polymorphisms on arterial functional changes and cardiac remodeling in hypertensive patients

Three subtypes of beta-adrenoceptor, beta1, beta2 and beta3, are involved in the sympathetic nervous system, which plays an important role in the development of hypertension and hypertensive complications. These complications can include left ventricular hypertrophy and arterial stiffness, which are reported risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. We designed clinical trials to clarify the association between hypertensive complications and beta-adrenoceptor single nucleotide polymorphisms in essential hypertension. Using Taqman PCR methods, we detected five polymorphisms of three beta-adrenoceptors: Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly for the beta1-adrenoceptor; Gly16Arg and Glu27Gln for the beta2-adrenoceptor; and Trp64Arg for the beta3-adrenoceptor. We included 300 subjects and measured pulse wave velocity, vasodilator response to hyperemia, left ventricular hypertrophy (by electrocardiogram and echocardiography), and cardiac enlargement (by chest X-ray). We found that pulse wave velocity and nitroglycerin-induced hyperemia were both closely associated with the Ser49Gly polymorphism (p<0.05), and Glu27Gln was found by both electrocardiogram and echocardiography to be significantly associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (p<0.05). These data suggested that two polymorphisms of different beta-adrenoreceptor subtypes are the genetic influences on the development of arterial stiffness and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension.

Beta1-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms in Mexican patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of beta1-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms (Ser49Gly and Arg389Gly) as susceptibility markers for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) in Mexican patients. The polymorphisms were analyzed in 47 patients with IDC and 93 ethnically matched healthy controls by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The Ser49Gly allele and genotype frequencies were similar in patients and healthy controls. On the other hand, the analysis of the Arg389Gly polymorphism showed an increased frequencies of the *Gly allele (pC = 0.022, OR = 2.16) and *Arg/*Gly genotype (pC = 0.027, OR = 2.70) in the group of IDC patients when compared to healthy controls. The data suggest that Arg389Gly polymorphism could be involved in the genetic susceptibility to develop IDC in Mexicans.

Genetic polymorphisms and heart failure

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome. There is evidence for a genetic contribution to the pathophysiology of heart failure. Considering the fundamental role of neurohormonal factors in the pathophysiology and progression of cardiac dysfunction and hypertrophy, variants of genes involved in this system are logical candidate genes in heart failure. In this report, genetic polymorphisms of the major neurohormonal systems in heart failure will be discussed. Studies on polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), adrenergic receptor polymorphisms, endothelin (receptor) polymorphisms, and a group of miscellaneous polymorphisms that may be involved in the development or phenotypic expression of heart failure will be reviewed. Research on left ventricular hypertrophy is also included. The majority of genetic association studies focused on the ACE I/D polymorphism. Initial genetic associations have often been difficult to replicate, mainly due to problems in study design and lack of power. Promising results have been obtained with genetic polymorphisms of the RAAS and sympathetic system. Considering the evidence so far, a modifying role for these polymorphisms seems more likely than a role of these variants as susceptibility genes. Besides the need for larger studies to examine the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes, future studies also need to focus on the complexity of these systems and study gene-gene interactions and gene-environment interactions.

Gender, ethnicity and genetics in cardiovascular disease: part 1: Basic principles

Prior to 1993, most drug efficacy and safety trials were conducted in white males, although gender and racial differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics have been documented since the early 1900s. Over the last 2 decades, supported by the FDA and legislation, attempts to include more women and minorities in clinical drug trials have been made, with limited success. Yet, there are important differences in pathophysiology and pharmacogenetics, as well as pharmacotherapeutic effectiveness. This is the first of 2 articles that review the basic scientific principles of such differences. In particular, genetic polymorphisms of cardiovascular candidate genes and drug metabolism are described. The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variations among genders and ethnicities are summarized.

Clinical importance of beta-adrenoceptor polymorphisms in cardiovascular disease

beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists play an important role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease and have been used for three decades in the treatment of hypertension and ischemic heart disease. More recently they have been demonstrated to improve survival in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure. The beneficial effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists stems from their ability to limit the deleterious effects of adrenergic stimulation, which in the cardiovascular system is primarily transmitted through two subclasses of receptor, beta(1) and beta(2). The advances of the Human Genome Project have led to an increased appreciation that variations in genetic background may underlie a substantial portion of the clinical heterogeneity apparent in cardiovascular disease. This review examines the molecular, functional, and clinical significance of the most common polymorphisms of the beta(1 and beta(2)-adrenoceptors. Initial research in adrenoceptor variation focused on the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. Three common polymorphisms appear to influence receptor function: Arg16-->Gly, Glu(27)-->Gln, and Thr(164)-->Ile. In in vitro studies of agonist stimulation, Gly(16) receptors demonstrate enhanced downregulation, while Glu(27) variants are resistant to downregulation. There is much controversy and conflict among various clinical studies regarding the effect of these variants on vasoreactivity and hypertensive risk. The Ile(164) variant demonstrates decreased responsiveness to agonist activity both in vitro and in animal models. In studies of patients with congestive heart failure, this variant has been associated with poor functional capacity and decreased survival. More recent investigations have focused on the two common polymorphisms of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor: Ser(49)-->Gly, and Arg(389)-->Gly. In vitro studies of Arg(389) receptors demonstrate a gain of function, as agonist stimulation results in significantly higher intracellular levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate when compared with the Gly(389) variant. Consistent with the in vitro data, clinical studies demonstrate increased responsiveness to beta-agonist stimulation, and an increased risk of hypertension among Arg(389) homozygotes. Further investigation of the clinical implications of these common variants of beta(1)- and beta2)-adrenoceptors are needed. Importantly, the pharmacogenetic impact of these variants on the effectiveness of beta-adrenergic blockade remains unknown.

Physicians' interpretation of "class effects": a need for thoughtful re-evaluation

The concept of pharmacologic "class effects" exists across a broad range of medical products and is particularly pervasive with regard to cardiovascular agents. Evolution of the concept over the past two decades has shown the influence of physicians' practice patterns, pharmaceutical companies, health maintenance organizations and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Understanding the evolution of health care, social and economic policies, acknowledging the correction of medical misconceptions and inaccurate understanding and appreciating the emergence of new medical knowledge over the past decade should modify the clinician's viewpoint of "class effects." These revelations should signal caution in extrapolating the outcome efficacy or safety of one agent to another within a pharmacologic class. The authors urge clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, health maintenance organizations and the FDA to re-examine their concept of "class effects." An appeal is made for physicians to prescribe those pharmaceutical agents with definitive evidence of mortality and morbidity efficacy and safety established by appropriately scaled randomized clinical trials.